Beef Cattle Feed Additives Market Size and Share
Market Overview
| Study Period | 2021 - 2031 |
|---|---|
| Market Size (2026) | USD 4.27 Billion |
| Market Size (2031) | USD 5.49 Billion |
| Growth Rate (2026 - 2031) | 5.15% CAGR |
| Fastest Growing Market | Asia-Pacific |
| Largest Market | North America |
| Market Concentration | Low |
Major Players
*Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0. |
|
Beef Cattle Feed Additives Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The beef cattle feed additives market size is projected to grow from USD 4.04 billion in 2025 to USD 4.27 billion in 2026 and is forecast to reach USD 5.49 billion by 2031 at 5.15% CAGR over 2026-2031. The 2026 revenue base reflects demand from large commercial feedlots, as well as more intensive cow-calf and growing operations that now use targeted nutritional programs with clearer performance goals. The beef cattle feed additives market is moving toward a more measured purchasing approach, where spending is tied to feed conversion, carcass yield, health stability, and emissions performance rather than routine inclusion alone. This shift is widening the addressable opportunity for suppliers that can connect additive use to operating results and verified sustainability outcomes in export-linked beef chains. Growth is also supported by the spread of commercial feeding systems in newer markets, where additive adoption rises as feedlot capacity, ration management, and compliance standards become more formal. At the same time, the beef cattle feed additives market still faces pressure from volatile input costs and long approval cycles, which favor suppliers with strong technical service, established regulatory capability, and broad distribution reach.
Key Report Takeaways
- By additive type, amino acids were the largest segment, accounting for 20.8% of the beef cattle feed additives market share in 2025, while antioxidants are anticipated to be the fastest-growing segment at a 6.7% CAGR during 2026-2031.
- By form, dry products were the largest segment, accounting for 56.3% of the beef cattle feed additives market in 2025, while liquid products will be the fastest-growing segment at a 6.2% CAGR during 2026-2031.
- By geography, North America was the largest segment with a 59.1% share in 2025, while Asia-Pacific is projected to be the fastest-growing segment at a 5.9% CAGR during 2026-2031.
Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.
Global Beef Cattle Feed Additives Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis*
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial feedlot demand for better feed conversion and daily gain | +1.4% | Global, with highest intensity in North America, South America, and Australia | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Shift from antibiotic growth promoters to gut-health additives | +1.1% | Global, with strongest adoption in the European Union, North America, and East Asia | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Higher mycotoxin and forage variability in beef rations | +0.7% | Global, with acute relevance in South America, North America, and Africa | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Precision mineral and amino acid supplementation adoption | +0.8% | Global, with strongest uptake in North America, Western Europe, and Australia | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Carbon-insetting demand for methane-reducing additives | +0.5% | Europe, North America, and Australia, with emerging relevance globally | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Byproduct-rich rations need more stabilizing additives | +0.4% | North America, South America, and China | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Commercial Feedlot Demand for Better Feed Conversion and Daily Gain
Large feedlot systems remain the most stable demand base in the beef cattle feed additives market because their economics depend on measurable feed efficiency and weight gain. In 2025, the World Resources Institute (WRI) reported that methane-inhibiting feed additives are among the most commercially advanced livestock emission-reduction technologies, with average methane reductions of around 30% and some technologies achieving reductions exceeding 90% under controlled conditions[1]Source: World Resources Institute (WRI), "Cutting Cattle Methane through Feed Additives: Lessons from Early Adoption and the Road Ahead," wri.org.. That level of use shows that performance additives in major confinement systems are treated as operating necessities rather than optional inputs. When grain costs rise, the financial value of even modest improvements in feed conversion becomes more apparent, helping keep demand resilient amid margin pressure. The same logic is now strengthening adoption in South American confinement systems, where more producers are validating high-concentrate feeding programs against local finishing economics.
Shift from Antibiotic Growth Promoters to Gut-Health Additives
The market is benefiting from the move away from antibiotic growth promoters in regulated livestock systems. This change is pushing commercial buyers toward probiotics, prebiotics, organic acids, and yeast derivatives that can support intake stability and gut function in receiving and finishing phases. In practice, many producers are not substituting one antibiotic product for another. Instead, they implement layered programs that incorporate multiple additive types to address various digestive and health needs. Products that move through recognized approval pathways, such as the Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) route in the United States and authorization reviews under the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), gain stronger commercial traction because buyers place greater value on documented compliance. That sorting effect favors larger suppliers with regulatory depth and raises the average technical standard across the beef cattle feed additives market.
Higher Mycotoxin and Forage Variability in Beef Rations
The industry is seeing firmer demand for binders, detoxifiers, and stabilizers as forage quality and byproduct consistency become less predictable. Weather variability, storage risks, and greater use of industrial feed byproducts increase the risk of co-occurring contamination or uneven nutrient profiles in beef rations. This shifts additive demand from occasional corrective use to more routine inclusion in systems seeking steadier intake and rumen performance. The effect is especially relevant in regions where feed ingredients move through long transport chains or where variable crop quality creates a wider gap between formulated and consumed nutrition. As ration managers work with less uniform raw materials, additive programs that protect feed stability and nutrient delivery are taking a more regular role in the beef cattle feed additives market.
Carbon-Insetting Demand for Methane-Reducing Additives
The beef cattle feed additives market is adding a new demand layer through methane-reduction programs that can generate value beyond direct feed performance. A 2025 study in Frontiers in Animal Science reported that 3-nitrooxypropanol reduced methane yield by 25.9% in confinement-fed beef cattle at the recommended dose of 60 mg per kg of dry matter intake[2]Source: Oklahoma State University Extension, “Feed Additives for Beef Cattle Production,” extension.okstate.edu. The World Resources Institute in 2025 also noted additive costs of USD 100 to USD 150 per cow per year, which matters because supply chain carbon programs can offset part of that cost in supported systems[3]Source: Frontiers in Animal Science, “Understanding Heterogeneity in Methane Emissions from Confinement-Fed Dairy and Beef Cattle Supplemented with Bovaer: A Meta-Analysis,” frontiersin.org. Canada registered Bovaer for beef and dairy use in 2024, extending the product’s regulatory base to 65 or more countries. This makes the beef cattle feed additives market less tied to farm-level commodity cycles in the methane inhibitor category than in most conventional additive segments.
Restraints Impact Analysis*
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tight approval and residue-compliance burden | -0.8% | Global, with strongest impact in the European Union, North America, and East Asia | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Volatile input costs for vitamins amino acids and fermentation products | -0.9% | Global, especially in import-dependent markets across Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and Africa | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Limited grazing-system fit for some methane inhibitors | -0.5% | South America, Australia, New Zealand, and Africa | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Weak on-farm data capture slows return on investment validation | -0.4% | Emerging beef-producing regions, especially South America, Africa, and Southeast Asia | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Tight Approval and Residue-Compliance Burden
The stringent approval processes significantly slow the commercialization of new biological and specialty products. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) employs the New Animal Drug Application (NADA) process for medicated feed combinations, which typically takes 3 to 5 years to complete. In the European Union, Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 mandates safety evaluations covering animal health, human health, and environmental impact, maintaining a high review standard. Export markets further complicate the process, as producers exporting to regions such as Japan, South Korea, or the European Union must comply with the strictest residue limits. Consequently, the beef cattle feed additives market tends to favor companies with robust regulatory capabilities over those with faster product development cycles.
Limited Grazing-System Fit for Some Methane Inhibitors
The industry does not yet capture the full methane-reduction opportunity because some products fit better with confinement systems than with extensive grazing systems. The strongest documented performance for 3-nitrooxypropanol has come from controlled-feeding environments where intake can be consistently managed. In pasture-dominant beef systems, daily delivery is harder to control, which reduces the practical fit of some methane inhibitor programs even when the environmental case is strong. This slows adoption in parts of South America, Africa, and Australia where grazing remains central to production. Until delivery models improve, the beef cattle feed additives market will continue to see a gap between high policy interest in methane reduction and the speed of field-level adoption in extensive systems.
*Our forecasts treat driver/restraint impacts as directional, not additive. The impact forecasts reflect baseline growth, mix effects, and variable interactions.
Segment Analysis
By Additive Type: Amino Acids Lead while Antioxidants Record the Fastest Expansion
Amino acids accounted for 20.8% of the beef cattle feed additives market share in 2025, making them the largest additive type. Their position reflects a clear role in protein efficiency, lean tissue deposition, and nitrogen use optimization across finishing, growing, and cow-calf systems. The fastest-growing additive type is antioxidants, which are projected to expand at a 6.7% CAGR during 2026-2031 as feed storage periods lengthen and higher-energy rations increase oxidation risk. The beef cattle feed additives market is also seeing stronger trade preference for natural antioxidant systems, such as tocopherols and citric acid, in export-sensitive applications. That demand pattern keeps amino acids central to performance programs while giving antioxidants a faster expansion path in more quality-conscious feeding systems.
Within the broader beef cattle feed additives industry, probiotics and prebiotics are gaining a stronger role in receiving and transition programs, where gut stability is closely tied to health cost control. Multi-strain formats are becoming more attractive than single-strain products because buyers want broader digestive support in post-antibiotic management. Yeast products are also advancing from a niche support role to a more regular inclusion in feedlot diets that need rumen pH balance and stronger fiber utilization. The European Commission authorized Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-4407 as a feed additive for cattle for fattening in 2025, which supports the commercial standing of live yeast systems in regulated markets. The beef cattle feed additives market still relies on minerals and vitamins as foundational categories, but the growth mix is shifting toward products that solve ration stability, gut health, and feed preservation issues more directly.
By Form: Dry Maintains Dominance as Liquid Formats Accelerate in Total Mixed Ration (TMR) Systems
Dry products accounted for 56.3% of the beef cattle feed additives market in 2025, making them the largest form segment in the study. Their scale comes from compatibility with the installed base of premix handling, batch mixing, pellet binding, and standard storage systems across global beef operations. Liquid products are the fastest-growing segment and are projected to grow at 6.2% CAGR during 2026-2031 as more intensive feeding systems adopt Total Mixed Ration (TMR) delivery. The beef cattle feed additives market favors liquid inclusion, where coating uniformity and intake consistency matter for low-inclusion compounds such as enzymes, microbials, and certain phytogenic systems. This means dry forms will remain dominant, while liquid systems continue to gain ground in higher-control operations.
Within the beef cattle feed additives industry, liquid and encapsulated formats also give suppliers a technical route to differentiate products that might otherwise be compared mainly on price. In 2025, Bluestar Adisseo Company advanced its MetaSmart production capacity expansion in Spain to support growing demand for liquid methionine solutions in ruminant nutrition, highlighting continued industry investment in precision nutrient delivery technologies. Such developments strengthen the commercial case for liquid inclusion systems that improve dosing consistency and nutrient utilization in intensive beef feeding operations. Even so, the capital needs for tanks, heated lines, and calibrated pumps still limit faster adoption on smaller or extensive beef farms.
Geography Analysis
North America held 59.1% of the beef cattle feed additives market share in 2025, which made it the largest regional segment. The region’s position reflects the technical intensity of the United States feedlot model, where multiple additive classes are already standard in high-concentrate finishing rations. The beef cattle feed additives market in North America is now driven by demand for methane-reduction programs, precision amino acid use, and gut-health products for the receiving phase that address morbidity and carcass-quality goals. Growth will likely stay moderate compared with faster regions because baseline adoption of core performance additives is already high in the most commercial systems. Future value creation in this region is likely to come more from premium products with stronger documentation than from simple volume expansion.
South America remains the highest-growth emerging region in the beef cattle feed additives market, as its cattle base is large and additive penetration still has room to grow. Brazil’s cattle herd exceeded 220 million head during the 2024-2025 period, confirming the region’s scale and its relevance to long-term additive demand. The growth case is strongest where more cattle are moving through confinement or semi-intensive finishing systems that require structured feeding and more consistent nutritional intervention. In 2024, DSM-Firmenich inaugurated a new animal nutrition facility in Sete Lagoas, Brazil, with the capacity to produce 100,000 metric tons of supplements annually for beef and dairy cattle, reinforcing industry investment in the Brazilian ruminant nutrition value chain and supporting future additive penetration across commercial beef systems. Argentina also supports demand because producers are using more targeted mineral programs in systems where deficiencies in copper, zinc, and selenium can materially reduce calf performance.
Europe remains a mature but specialized part of the beef cattle feed additives market, with demand centered on regulated yeast products, phytogenics, amino acids, and methane-related solutions. Asia-Pacific is the fastest regional segment and is projected to expand at 5.9% CAGR during 2026-2031, supported by feedlot growth and regulatory modernization in China and nearby markets. China expanded the approved use of guanidinoacetic acid for beef fattening cattle in Total Mixed Ration (TMR) programs in January 2026, which shows official support for performance additives in a growing commercial system. De Heus Animal Nutrition B.V. maintains operations across Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, where cattle population growth and feed modernization are creating early-stage demand for more formal additive programs. The Middle East presents a distinct opportunity set for the beef cattle feed additives market, as heat stress, reliance on imported feed, and long storage cycles support steady use of antioxidants, acidifiers, and mineral premixes.
Competitive Landscape
The beef cattle feed additives market remained structurally fragmented in 2025, and competition is split between broad agricultural groups and more focused specialty suppliers. Large integrated companies such as Cargill, Incorporated and Archer Daniels Midland Company compete with an advantage in distribution, ration access, and customer relationships built through wider feed and grain operations. Category specialists such as Zinpro Corporation and Elanco Animal Health Incorporated compete differently, using technical service, product-specific data, and application depth to defend share in narrower additive categories. This mix keeps the beef cattle feed additives market open to multiple business models rather than favoring a single dominant structure. It also explains why commercial leadership often depends on local channel strength in one category and scientific credibility in another.
The beef cattle feed additives market is undergoing strategic repositioning, with companies refining their portfolios and focusing on higher-value biological and specialty segments. In May 2025, Kemin Industries, Incorporated acquired Bactana Corporation, a Cornell University spinout specializing in fermentation and intestinal health technologies. This acquisition expanded Kemin Industries, Incorporated’s direct-fed microbial offerings, aligning with the growing demand for innovative animal health solutions. Similarly, in February 2025, Novonesis Limited acquired DSM-Firmenich AG’s stake in the Feed Enzyme Alliance for USD 1.62 billion (EUR 1.5 billion), marking one of the most significant restructurings in the feed enzyme segment in recent years. These developments highlight a trend of selective consolidation within the beef cattle feed additives market, with a focus on technical niches to meet evolving industry needs.
The beef cattle feed additives market offers opportunities where biological additives, compliance documentation, and farm data systems overlap. Currently, no supplier has a fully integrated platform that connects additive recommendations, on-farm performance tracking, and commercial verification. This opens the door for companies that can show clear benefits in feed efficiency, health stability, or emissions reduction. Competitive advantages can change quickly when a supplier gains regulatory approvals, improves delivery methods, or provides measurable results. While the market remains fragmented, it is becoming more focused on evidence and service support to secure repeat customers.
Beef Cattle Feed Additives Industry Leaders
-
Cargill, Incorporated
-
Archer Daniels Midland Company
-
Nutreco N.V. (SHV Holdings N.V.)
-
DSM-Firmenich AG
-
Alltech, Inc.
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- April 2026: Rumin8 reported positive results from commercial cattle trials in Brazil conducted with Minerva Foods, demonstrating the effectiveness of its methane-reducing feed additive technology under commercial conditions. Cattle receiving the additive in a Total Mixed Ration (TMR) achieved a 50.4% reduction in methane emissions and a 5.0% improvement in feed conversion efficiency versus a control group, reinforcing the commercial potential of feed-based methane mitigation solutions for beef cattle.
- January 2026: China's Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA) issued Announcement No. 982, approving 7 new feed additive products and expanding the permitted use scope of 8 existing additives. The announcement expanded the regulatory pathway for additional feed additive technologies and supported broader commercialization opportunities within China's livestock sector.
- April 2025: The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved NADA 141-586, a new three-way medicated feed combination of lubabegron, monensin, and virginiamycin for growing beef steers and heifers fed in confinement for slaughter, targeting improvements in feed efficiency and ammonia gas emissions per pound of live weight.
Global Beef Cattle Feed Additives Market Report Scope
The beef cattle feed additives market covers nutritional, functional, and performance-enhancing ingredients added to feed or ration systems for beef cattle.
The Beef Cattle Feed Additives Market Report is Segmented by Additive Type (Acidifiers, Antibiotics, Antioxidants, Amino Acids, Binders, Enzymes, Flavors and Sweeteners, Minerals, Mycotoxin Detoxifiers, Phytogenics, Probiotics, Prebiotics, Pigments, Vitamins, and Yeast), by Form (Dry and Liquid), and by Geography (North America, South America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value and Volume.
| Acidifiers | Lactic Acid |
| Propionic Acid | |
| Fumaric Acid | |
| Other Acidifiers | |
| Antibiotics | Tetracyclines |
| Penicillins | |
| Tylosin | |
| Bacitracin | |
| Other Antibiotics | |
| Antioxidants | Butylated Hydroxyanisole (BHA) |
| Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) | |
| Ethoxyquin | |
| Propyl Gallate | |
| Tocopherols | |
| Citric Acid | |
| Other Antioxidants | |
| Amino Acids | Lysine |
| Tryptophan | |
| Methionine | |
| Threonine | |
| Other Amino Acid | |
| Binders | Natural Binders |
| Synthetic Binders | |
| Enzymes | Carbohydrases |
| Phytases | |
| Other Enzymes | |
| Flavors and Sweeteners | Flavors |
| Sweeteners | |
| Minerals | Macrominerals |
| Microminerals | |
| Mycotoxin Detoxifiers | Binders |
| Biotransformers | |
| Phytogenics | Herbs & Spices |
| Essential Oil | |
| Other Phytogenics | |
| Pigments | Carotenoids |
| Curcumin & Spirulina | |
| Prebiotics | Inulin |
| Fructo Oligosaccharides | |
| Galacto Oligosaccharides | |
| Xylo Oligosaccharides | |
| Lactulose | |
| Mannan Oligosaccharides | |
| Other Prebiotics | |
| Probiotics | Lactobacilli |
| Bifidobacteria | |
| Streptococcus | |
| Pediococcus | |
| Enterococcus | |
| Other Probiotics | |
| Vitamins | Vitamin A |
| Vitamin B | |
| Vitamin C | |
| Vitamin E | |
| Other Vitamins | |
| Yeast | Live Yeast |
| Spent Yeast | |
| Torula Dried Yeast | |
| Selenium Yeast | |
| Whey Yeast | |
| Yeast Derivatives |
| Dry |
| Liquid |
| North America | United States |
| Canada | |
| Mexico | |
| Rest of North America | |
| South America | Brazil |
| Argentina | |
| Chile | |
| Rest of South America | |
| Europe | Germany |
| France | |
| United Kingdom | |
| Italy | |
| Spain | |
| Netherlands | |
| Russia | |
| Rest of Europe | |
| Asia-Pacific | China |
| India | |
| Japan | |
| Australia | |
| New Zealand | |
| South Korea | |
| Indonesia | |
| Thailand | |
| Vietnam | |
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | |
| Middle East | Saudi Arabia |
| Turkey | |
| Iran | |
| United Arab Emirates | |
| Rest of Middle East | |
| Africa | South Africa |
| Egypt | |
| Kenya | |
| Rest of Africa |
| By Additive | Acidifiers | Lactic Acid |
| Propionic Acid | ||
| Fumaric Acid | ||
| Other Acidifiers | ||
| Antibiotics | Tetracyclines | |
| Penicillins | ||
| Tylosin | ||
| Bacitracin | ||
| Other Antibiotics | ||
| Antioxidants | Butylated Hydroxyanisole (BHA) | |
| Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) | ||
| Ethoxyquin | ||
| Propyl Gallate | ||
| Tocopherols | ||
| Citric Acid | ||
| Other Antioxidants | ||
| Amino Acids | Lysine | |
| Tryptophan | ||
| Methionine | ||
| Threonine | ||
| Other Amino Acid | ||
| Binders | Natural Binders | |
| Synthetic Binders | ||
| Enzymes | Carbohydrases | |
| Phytases | ||
| Other Enzymes | ||
| Flavors and Sweeteners | Flavors | |
| Sweeteners | ||
| Minerals | Macrominerals | |
| Microminerals | ||
| Mycotoxin Detoxifiers | Binders | |
| Biotransformers | ||
| Phytogenics | Herbs & Spices | |
| Essential Oil | ||
| Other Phytogenics | ||
| Pigments | Carotenoids | |
| Curcumin & Spirulina | ||
| Prebiotics | Inulin | |
| Fructo Oligosaccharides | ||
| Galacto Oligosaccharides | ||
| Xylo Oligosaccharides | ||
| Lactulose | ||
| Mannan Oligosaccharides | ||
| Other Prebiotics | ||
| Probiotics | Lactobacilli | |
| Bifidobacteria | ||
| Streptococcus | ||
| Pediococcus | ||
| Enterococcus | ||
| Other Probiotics | ||
| Vitamins | Vitamin A | |
| Vitamin B | ||
| Vitamin C | ||
| Vitamin E | ||
| Other Vitamins | ||
| Yeast | Live Yeast | |
| Spent Yeast | ||
| Torula Dried Yeast | ||
| Selenium Yeast | ||
| Whey Yeast | ||
| Yeast Derivatives | ||
| By Form | Dry | |
| Liquid | ||
| By Geography | North America | United States |
| Canada | ||
| Mexico | ||
| Rest of North America | ||
| South America | Brazil | |
| Argentina | ||
| Chile | ||
| Rest of South America | ||
| Europe | Germany | |
| France | ||
| United Kingdom | ||
| Italy | ||
| Spain | ||
| Netherlands | ||
| Russia | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| Asia-Pacific | China | |
| India | ||
| Japan | ||
| Australia | ||
| New Zealand | ||
| South Korea | ||
| Indonesia | ||
| Thailand | ||
| Vietnam | ||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||
| Middle East | Saudi Arabia | |
| Turkey | ||
| Iran | ||
| United Arab Emirates | ||
| Rest of Middle East | ||
| Africa | South Africa | |
| Egypt | ||
| Kenya | ||
| Rest of Africa | ||
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the 2026 to 2031 outlook for beef cattle feed additives?
The beef cattle feed additives market is valued at USD 4.27 billion in 2026 and is forecast to reach USD 5.49 billion by 2031 at 5.15% CAGR over 2026-2031.
Which additive type leads beef cattle feed additives revenue?
Amino acids were the largest additive type in 2025 with 20.8% share, supported by their role in protein efficiency and lean muscle deposition.
Which form is expanding the fastest in beef cattle feeding programs?
Liquid products are the fastest form segment with 6.2% CAGR during 2026-2031, mainly in more intensive Total Mixed Ration systems.
Which region currently leads global demand for beef cattle feed additives?
North America was the largest regional segment in 2025 with 59.1% share, reflecting the scale and technical intensity of commercial feedlot operations.
Why are methane-reducing additives getting more attention in beef systems?
Buyers are linking these products to both emissions reduction and commercial value, especially where carbon programs can offset part of additive cost.
What is the main risk for suppliers in this space?
Input cost volatility and long approval timelines remain the main constraints because they can slow premium additive adoption and delay commercialization of newer products.
Page last updated on:
