Digital Printing For Flexible Packaging Market Size and Share

Digital Printing For Flexible Packaging Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The digital printing for flexible packaging market size is estimated at USD 6.81 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 12.68 billion by 2030, growing at a 13.24% CAGR. This robust outlook reflects brand owners’ need for short runs, personalization, and on-demand replenishment, all of which align with e-commerce fulfillment models and sustainability mandates. Converters are reallocating capital toward digital presses that eliminate plates, trim setup waste, and accelerate design changeovers, while consumer packaged goods (CPG) companies intensify late-stage customization to capture micro-segments. Technology suppliers have responded with faster heads, wider webs, and automated color management, bringing digital quality and speed close to analog norms. At the same time, sustainability regulations across Europe and North America reward low-waste, low-VOC production, prompting converters to shift toward water-based or electron-beam systems that meet food-contact regulations and carbon reduction targets. Competitive intensity is therefore shifting from pure capacity scale to the ability to flex between SKUs without sacrificing economics.
Key Report Takeaways
- By printing technology, water-based inkjet captured 43.87% of the digital printing for flexible packaging market share in 2024.
- By packaging type, digital printing for flexible packaging market size for pouches is projected to grow at 14.89% CAGR between 2025–2030.
- By ink type, water-based systems captured 40.76% of the digital printing for flexible packaging market share in 2024.
- By material type, digital printing for flexible packaging market size for compostable films is projected to grow at 16.21% CAGR between 2025–2030.
- By end-user industry, food applications captured 52.28% of the digital printing for flexible packaging market share in 2024.
- By geography, digital printing for flexible packaging market size for Asia-Pacific is projected to grow at 15.18% CAGR through 2030.
Global Digital Printing For Flexible Packaging Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rapid SKU proliferation in FMCG | +2.8% | Global, concentrated in North America and Asia-Pacific | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Shorter lead-time demand from e-commerce fulfillment | +3.1% | Global, led by North America and Europe | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Shift toward sustainable, low-waste print runs | +2.3% | Europe and North America core, spreading to Asia-Pacific | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Flexible packaging converters’ CAPEX peak 2024-27 | +2.2% | Global, focused on established manufacturing regions | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Brand adoption of late-stage package customization | +1.9% | North America and Europe, emerging in Asia-Pacific | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| On-press color management AI enhancing OEE | +1.7% | Global, early uptake in developed economies | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Rapid SKU proliferation in FMCG
CPG companies have launched 40% more product variants annually since 2024, driven by data-rich personalization and regional micro-targeting strategies. Every new flavor, scent, or nutritional twist requires its own package, and digital presses accommodate these shifts without the need for plates or lengthy changeovers. Unilever cut lead time from 12 to 3 weeks by switching mid-tier runs to digital platforms that queue SKUs sequentially, avoiding downtime while meeting local compliance marks. As AI engines refine consumer segmentation, converters experience even finer SKU granularity, rendering analog economics untenable for many jobs.[1]Source: Unilever, “Accelerating Packaging Lead Times with Digital Printing,” unilever.com In parallel, e-commerce algorithms reward fast design refreshes, so brands view packaging as an agile marketing surface rather than a fixed asset. All of this funnels incremental volume into the digital printing for flexible packaging market, reinforcing its trajectory of double-digit growth.
Shorter lead-time demand from e-commerce fulfillment
Amazon’s footprint surpassed 1,000 global fulfillment sites in 2024, establishing a two-day or faster delivery standard that cascades upstream to the packaging supply chain. Digital workflows match that tempo because SKUs can be released to press minutes after artwork approval, with no plates to engrave or mount. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s 2024 guidance on sustainable e-commerce packaging additionally favors right-sized flexible formats that digital presses can gang-run with near-zero setup waste. Regional 3PLs now shortlist converters based on 24-hour turnaround benchmarks, giving digitally equipped plants a decisive edge and accelerating replacements of aging flexo lines.
Shift toward sustainable, low-waste print runs
The European Union’s Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation sets a 15% waste reduction target by 2030, and digital presses inherently generate no makeready scrap during job changeovers. Ink laydown can also be tuned to deliver images with 8-12% lower consumption versus analog flood coats. Brands focused on carbon disclosure are therefore shifting limited-edition campaigns entirely to digital, as Nestlé did for its 2025 holiday confectionery range. Digital compatibility with compostable substrates strengthens the sustainability case, as lower operating temperatures prevent film warping that occurs on conventional dryers.
Flexible packaging converters’ CAPEX peak 2024-27
Major groups, including Amcor, Mondi, and Constantia, have collectively earmarked USD 2.5 billion for flexible packaging line upgrades through 2027, with the spending curve peaking during the current budgeting window. Much of that budget targets hybrid webs that support both digital and analog units, letting plants sequence prototypes, short runs, and volume replenishment with shared unwinds and dryers. Vendors respond by releasing modular frames that receive inkjet bars in the field, reducing the risk of stranded assets. Because capital approvals are front-loaded, order books for digital interiors are locked in, ensuring strong equipment shipment growth and, by extension, stable consumables pull-through for inks and heads.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| High unit-ink cost versus analog for long runs | -1.8% | Global, most pronounced in cost-sensitive markets | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Volatile PET and PE film pricing post-2025 | -1.4% | Global, with regional raw-material disparities | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Limited food-contact compliant white inks | -1.2% | Europe and North America are more restrictive | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Converter workforce skill gap in the digital workflow | -0.9% | Global, severe in emerging markets | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
High unit-ink cost versus analog for long runs
Digital ink pricing remains three to five times higher per square meter than solvent or water-based flexo sets when volumes exceed 10,000 linear meters, squeezing converter margins on legacy SKUs with predictable demand curves. These specialty fluids incorporate nanometric pigments, photoinitiators, and food-contact stabilizers, which are produced in smaller batches, resulting in limited economies of scale. The cost delta narrows when makeready waste and plate amortization are factored in, yet for billion-unit snack brands, the mathematics still leans toward analog. As a result, converters often retain flexo capacity for Tier-1 SKUs while reserving digital presses for promotional, regional, or late-stage customization work, moderating the speed of digital penetration.
Volatile PET and PE film pricing post-2025
Feedstock disruptions and energy price fluctuations drove average European PET and PE resin prices up 15-20% in 2024. Flexible packaging converters absorb these spikes on the substrate side, whether they print digitally or analog, but the higher unit ink cost in digital workflows compounds the strain. Some buyers postpone digital transitions on commodity snack films until resin indices stabilize, diverting budget to hybrid retrofits rather than full digital installations. The volatility also complicates ROI calculations for presses tied to specific web widths or material calipers, injecting caution into procurement committees and clipping near-term market upside.
Segment Analysis
By Printing Technology: Hybrid Systems Bridge Operational Economics
Hybrid presses delivered the fastest 15.36% CAGR, yet water-based inkjet retained 43.87% share of the digital printing for flexible packaging market in 2024. The segment’s resilience stems from its compliance with food-contact regulations, odor neutrality, and favorable sustainability optics. At the same time, converters seeking balanced asset utilization tend toward hybrid architectures that combine digital heads with flexo or gravure stations in a single frame. Such designs enable long-run SKUs to remain on analog decks, while seasonal SKUs route through the inkjet bridge, eliminating the cost penalty associated with digital ink on high-coverage images. The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) updated ISO 12647-8 in 2024, codifying process control for half-tones and nudging converters toward closed-loop color systems, which many hybrid units now incorporate.
Hybrid adoption accelerates because new lines from Heidelberg, Komori, and Windmöller and Hölscher offer automated register, AI color drift correction, and ultrafast changeovers. Plants that once juggled separate presses for trial runs and commercial rolls can now shift modes in-stream, collapsing work-in-progress inventories. These features reduce floor space and labor, offsetting higher capex. Electrophotographic engines continue to serve health and beauty labels requiring photographic density, yet incremental share gains concentrate in hybrid inkjet, validating the thesis that flexible packaging workflows will never swing 100% digital or 100% analog but will cohabitate inside modular frameworks.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Packaging Type: Pouches Align with Omnichannel Logistics
Pouches accounted for 48.26% of the revenue in 2024 and are forecasted to have a 14.89% CAGR, the highest within the digital printing for flexible packaging market. Their lightweight and product-to-package ratio meet courier dimensional weight thresholds, lowering last-mile costs for e-commerce sellers. Digital presses enhance pouches’ shelf appeal by supporting vibrant graphics and variable QR codes that power loyalty programs. Stick packs, sachets, and wraps occupy niche medical and single-serve food spaces, but their smaller panels still benefit from late-stage print, motivating converters to queue them on the same digital lines as premium pouches. Labels, though a separate category in many CPG budgets, reinforce the ecosystem by providing digital quality and security features that then migrate to pouch webs.
Growth also correlates with sustainability: pouches often use 30-40% less plastic than rigid tubs at the same volume, a factor that many life-cycle assessments now quantify in retailer scorecards. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission updated its guidance in 2024, highlighting the tamper-evident potential of pouches and encouraging the use of safe closure designs. Digital printing magnifies that advantage by embedding variable authentication graphics during the same pass, thereby avoiding the need for secondary labels. Wraps and rollstock remain fixtures for high-throughput snacks, and many plants keep these SKUs on flexo to amortize historical investments, yet an expanding slice migrates to hybrid floors when promotional cycles shorten.
By Ink Type: Electron-Beam Curing Wins Eco Credentials
Water-based systems dominated the market with a 40.76% market share in 2024, but electron-beam (EB) curables are projected to climb at a 14.75% CAGR through 2030 as converters seek VOC-free, energy-efficient curing solutions. EB inks polymerize without photoinitiators, reducing migration risk in food pouches while cutting dryer energy by up to 50%. This pathway addresses European Chemicals Agency restrictions that narrowed the allowable lists of solvents and photoinitiators in 2024. UV inks persist where scuff resistance trumps cost, such as in lawn-and-garden products or chemical wipes, whereas solvent systems retreat to emerging regions with less stringent regulations. Vendors such as Sun Chemical launched next-generation water-based sets specifically designed for high-speed piezo heads, addressing gloss and adhesion gaps that previously limited adoption.
Compostable film compatibility also weighs heavily: EB curing operates at near-ambient web temperatures, preventing warpage of PLA or starch blends. Several multinational food groups now specify EB or water-based chemistries for pilot launches to guarantee future shelf-ready compliance. As volumes increase, ink manufacturers scale up EB production, gradually narrowing the cost differential against UV. The ecosystem thus converges on two low-VOC pillars, water and EB, with legacy solvent niches shrinking each budget cycle.
By Material Type: Compostable Films Disrupt Legacy Webs
Plastic films still cover 65.43% of the total square meters in 2024, with their barrier versatility and price point; yet, compostable alternatives post a market-leading 16.21% CAGR. ASTM D6400 updates in 2024 clarified labeling parameters, enabling brands to green-light marketing claims with less legal exposure. Because digital heads run cooler than analog dryers, converters can print corn-based PLA or cellulose webs without seal failure, giving digital players a first-mover edge. Paper laminates remain relevant in applications where modest grease or oxygen barrier demands are required, while aluminum foil is best suited for high-barrier applications, such as coffee bricks or medical sachets.
Major resin suppliers now commercialize mono-material polyethylene structures optimized for inkjet adhesion, enabling easier recycling within established polyethylene streams. Digital presses accommodate these thin gauges without mechanical contact, thereby preserving optical clarity and stiffness. As policymakers push extended producer responsibility (EPR) fees tied to recyclability indices, converters capable of delivering mono-material or compostable webs at short order intervals gain bargaining power with brand owners.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By End-user Industry: Personal Care Commands Premium Margins
Food retails hold the largest 52.28% slice of the digital printing for flexible packaging market size because every snack, protein bar, or frozen entrée benefits from barrier and z-plane efficiency. Personal care and cosmetics, however, outpace all segments at 17.94% CAGR, monetizing digital’s bespoke aesthetics and frequent seasonal drops. A single lotion range might release ten limited fragrances yearly; digital print makes those micro runs profitable. Beverages rely on flexible spouted pouches for children’s juices and fitness gels, converting formerly rigid SKUs to shelf-stable films that fit e-commerce shipping requirements. Pharmaceuticals prioritize serialized traceability, and digital variable data underpins DSCSA and EU-FMD compliance.
Household cleaners, once dominated by rigid HDPE, pivot toward refill pouches featuring digital registration windows and dosing spouts. The FDA’s 2024 update on pharmaceutical packaging spelled out digital traceability’s value, tipping more OTC brands toward security-enabled sachets. Overall, end-user diversification cushions converters against cyclical swings in any single category while raising print complexity, further favoring digitally oriented workflows
Geography Analysis
The Asia-Pacific region led with 34.73% revenue in 2024 and is projected to post the steepest growth of 15.18% CAGR through 2030. China drove early adoption after mandating digital labeling on select consumer goods in 2024, prompting converters in Guangdong and Zhejiang to add inkjet capacity. India’s CPG boom creates additional demand as D2C brands utilize social media to launch micro-fragrances and nutraceutical sachets that require agile printing.[2]Source: Consumer Product Safety Commission, “Updated Guidelines on Flexible Packaging Safety,” cpsc.gov Japan and South Korea, known for cosmetic innovation, channel premium jobs to hybrid halls that guarantee photographic gradients. Regional governments encourage digital’s lower waste profile to ease landfill pressure, especially in densely urbanized areas where disposal costs soar.
North America follows as a mature yet innovation-heavy arena. Amazon, Walmart, and Target set replenishment cycles that assume 48-hour artwork finalization, locking analog printers out of promotional windows. Sustainability legislation in California and Washington taxes high-VOC processes, incentivizing converters to migrate to water-based or EB lines. The digital printing for flexible packaging market, therefore, finds steady volume in the snack, pet food, and health supplement sectors, with a new boost from liquid refill pouches entering mainstream household aisles.
Europe maintains strict environmental compliance codes that render digital printing almost a default for green-labeled SKUs. The Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation puts hard caps on per-unit waste, elevating zero-makeready workflows. German and Nordic governments additionally subsidize compostable film trials, funneling pilot runs to digital presses with gentle drying profiles. Hybrid installations flourish in Italy and Spain where converters manage export-heavy portfolios mixing artisanal olive oil pouches with mass-market confectionery wrappers.

Competitive Landscape
The digital printing for flexible packaging market displays moderate concentration. Conglomerates such as Amcor, Mondi, and Constantia leverage their extensive customer bases and global resin procurement capabilities to finance multi-site digital rollouts. Amcor invested USD 45 million in European hybrid lines during 2024 to blend speed with flexibility across snack and coffee clients. Mid-tier specialists ePac Flexibles and Multi-Color Corporation differentiate themselves through distributed micro-factories co-located near fulfillment hubs, which cuts transit time and inventory for small and mid-sized brands.[3]Source: Amcor plc, “Digital Printing Infrastructure Investment,” amcor.com
Competitive thrust now orbits around hybrid integration. Plants that synchronize analog stations with drop-on-demand bars win bids that combine base graphics in flexo with late-stage flavor variants digitally, resulting in 20-30% cost savings compared to separate passes. Patent filings for hybrid frames and inkjet head recirculation increased by 25% in 2024, indicating sustained research and development competition. Ink vendors equally compete on low-migration sets: Multi-Color became the first to secure FDA clearance for a food-contact white ink, unlocking premium confectionery contracts and pressuring rivals to emulate.
Artificial intelligence emerges as a capability differentiator. Schur Flexibles deployed AI color management, which cuts setup time by 40%; others are racing to embed predictive maintenance to minimize nozzle downtime. As a result, market share increasingly links to software prowess rather than sheer tonnage. Still, sticky food-contact approvals and multi-year brand agreements raise entry barriers, keeping concentration balanced rather than fragmented. The top five converters collectively held about 38-40% revenue in 2024, leaving ample white space for regional challengers yet discouraging commodity price wars.
Digital Printing For Flexible Packaging Industry Leaders
ProAmpac Holdings Inc.
Constantia Flexibles Group GmbH
Amcor plc
Mondi plc
Huhtamäki Oyj
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order

Recent Industry Developments
- January 2025: Sealed Air Corporation inaugurated its second digital print hub in Dallas, targeting same-day ship protective mailers for marketplace sellers.
- October 2024: Constantia Flexibles completed its EUR 630 million (USD 686 million) acquisition of Aluflexpack, creating the world’s largest flexible packaging converter with expanded digital capacity.
- September 2024: ePac Flexible Packaging secured USD 75 million Series D funding led by Carlyle Group to triple North American press installations.
- September 2024: HP Inc. launched the Indigo 25K Digital Press tailored for flexible webs with food-contact compliant ink sets.
Global Digital Printing For Flexible Packaging Market Report Scope
| Electrophotography |
| UV Inkjet |
| Water-based Inkjet |
| Hybrid Presses |
| Other Printing Technologies |
| Pouches |
| Stick Packs and Sachets |
| Wraps and Rollstock |
| Bags |
| Labels |
| Other Packaging Types |
| UV-curable Inks |
| Water-based Inks |
| Solvent-based Inks |
| Electron-beam (EB) Inks |
| Plastic Films (PET, PE, PP) |
| Paper and Paper-based Laminates |
| Aluminum Foil |
| Compostable Films |
| Other Material Types |
| Food |
| Beverages |
| Pharmaceuticals |
| Personal Care and Cosmetics |
| Household |
| Other End-user Industries |
| North America | United States | |
| Canada | ||
| Mexico | ||
| South America | Brazil | |
| Argentina | ||
| Chile | ||
| Rest of South America | ||
| Europe | United Kingdom | |
| Germany | ||
| France | ||
| Italy | ||
| Spain | ||
| Russia | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| Asia-Pacific | China | |
| India | ||
| Japan | ||
| South Korea | ||
| Australia | ||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||
| Middle East and Africa | Middle East | Saudi Arabia |
| United Arab Emirates | ||
| Turkey | ||
| Rest of Middle East | ||
| Africa | South Africa | |
| Nigeria | ||
| Rest of Africa | ||
| By Printing Technology | Electrophotography | ||
| UV Inkjet | |||
| Water-based Inkjet | |||
| Hybrid Presses | |||
| Other Printing Technologies | |||
| By Packaging Type | Pouches | ||
| Stick Packs and Sachets | |||
| Wraps and Rollstock | |||
| Bags | |||
| Labels | |||
| Other Packaging Types | |||
| By Ink Type | UV-curable Inks | ||
| Water-based Inks | |||
| Solvent-based Inks | |||
| Electron-beam (EB) Inks | |||
| By Material Type | Plastic Films (PET, PE, PP) | ||
| Paper and Paper-based Laminates | |||
| Aluminum Foil | |||
| Compostable Films | |||
| Other Material Types | |||
| By End-user Industry | Food | ||
| Beverages | |||
| Pharmaceuticals | |||
| Personal Care and Cosmetics | |||
| Household | |||
| Other End-user Industries | |||
| By Geography | North America | United States | |
| Canada | |||
| Mexico | |||
| South America | Brazil | ||
| Argentina | |||
| Chile | |||
| Rest of South America | |||
| Europe | United Kingdom | ||
| Germany | |||
| France | |||
| Italy | |||
| Spain | |||
| Russia | |||
| Rest of Europe | |||
| Asia-Pacific | China | ||
| India | |||
| Japan | |||
| South Korea | |||
| Australia | |||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | |||
| Middle East and Africa | Middle East | Saudi Arabia | |
| United Arab Emirates | |||
| Turkey | |||
| Rest of Middle East | |||
| Africa | South Africa | ||
| Nigeria | |||
| Rest of Africa | |||
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the current value of the digital printing market for flexible packaging?
It is valued at USD 6.81 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 12.68 billion by 2030.
Which packaging format captures the largest share?
Pouches led with a 48.26% revenue share in 2024, as they are well-suited for e-commerce logistics and variable data printing.
Which printing technology is growing the fastest?
Hybrid presses are forecast to grow at 15.36% CAGR through 2030 by combining digital flexibility with analog speed.
Why are electron-beam inks gaining popularity?
They cure without photo initiators, cut energy use, and comply with food-contact rules, driving a 14.75% CAGR.
Which region has the highest growth potential?
The Asia-Pacific region pairs the largest 34.73% share with the fastest 15.18% CAGR, driven by regulatory shifts and CPG expansion.
What key restraint limits wider adoption?
High digital ink costs versus analog for long runs reduce competitiveness for mass-volume SKUs above 10,000 linear meters.




