Aquatic Herbicides Market Size and Share
Aquatic Herbicides Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The aquatic herbicides market size stands at USD 0.83 bllion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 1.15 billion by 2030 at a CAGR of 6.8%. Broader adoption of reduced-risk active ingredients, the rising costs of mechanical removal, and expanding restoration programs are the chief forces shaping this trajectory. Regulatory clearances for next-generation chemistries have shortened application windows, while digital bathymetry and drone-spraying systems are lowering entry costs for small lake districts. Competitive dynamics favor established suppliers able to bundle technical support and compliance expertise, yet regional specialists still find room to grow by offering custom formulations tailored to local water-quality standards. Eco-tourism initiatives that monetize clear, weed-free lakes are steadily expanding public funding pools, giving government agencies predictable budgets for long-term vegetation plans.
Key Report Takeaways
- By product type, glyphosate captured 42% of the aquatic herbicides market share in 2024, while Imazamox is projected to expand at an 11.8% CAGR through 2030, outpacing all other product categories.
- By mode of action, non-selective products led with a 59% share of the aquatic herbicides market size in 2024, while selective variants are advancing at a 10.9% CAGR to 2030.
- By application method, foliar application retained 54% share of the aquatic herbicides market size in 2024; submersed injection is growing fastest at a 10.1% CAGR through 2030.
- By end-user industry, agricultural water bodies held 38% of the aquatic herbicides market share in 2024; fisheries and aquaculture usage is climbing at a 9.6% CAGR to 2030.
- By formulation, liquid concentrates accounted for 66% of the aquatic herbicides market size in 2024, whereas granular and pelletized formulations are projected to post the fastest increase at a 9.9% CAGR to 2030.
- By geography, North America remains the largest region with 45% of the market share, Asia-Pacific is the fastest-expanding territory, advancing at an 8.40% CAGR.
- SePRO Corporation and BASF SE together controlled 30.3% of total revenue in 2024.
Global Aquatic Herbicides Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Escalating invasive-weed outbreaks in hydropower reservoirs | +1.8% | Global; concentrated in North America and Europe | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Accelerated permitting of reduced-risk actives | +1.5% | North America and European Union; expanding to Asia-Pacific | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Shift to eco-tourism and blue-economy funding | +1.2% | Global; early uptake in developed markets | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Expansion of aquaculture acreage | +1.4% | Asia-Pacific core; spillover to Americas | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Digital bathymetry and drone-spraying | +1.1% | Global; faster adoption in North America and Europe | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Emergence of bio-based chelation carriers | +0.9% | North America and European Union | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Accelerated Permitting of Reduced-Risk Actives by Regulatory Bodies
The Environmental Protection Agency registered glufosinate-P in October 2024, a milestone that demonstrates the agency’s shortened review window for chemistries meeting endangered-species criteria. The Final Herbicide Strategy, announced two months earlier, outlines a streamlined two-tier process: dossiers passing an initial mitigations screen bypass expensive biological opinions, which historically delayed approvals by several years. Europe mirrors this approach through its parallel pesticide review system, evidenced by the phasing out of metribuzin and tritosulfuron in 2024. Suppliers that invested early in substitution portfolios now enjoy a regulatory head start, capturing premium shelf space and securing tender agreements with environmental-compliance clauses. Reduced-risk certificates also unlock federal cost-share grants, further accelerating uptake.
Shift to Eco-Tourism and Blue-Economy Funding for Lake Restoration Projects
The World Bank’s Lakewide Inclusive Sanitation Strategy earmarks USD 1.9 billion for Lake Victoria, embedding aquatic vegetation control within a holistic restoration package. Funding frameworks link herbicide success metrics to tourism revenue, compelling contractors to deliver rapid water-clarity gains. As state legislatures see tax receipts rise from revitalized lakes, annual maintenance budgets grow more predictable. Selective products such as florpyrauxifen accept premiums because they preserve native plant diversity that supports recreational angling.
Expansion of Aquaculture Acreage Driving Demand for Water-Safe Chemistry
In the past two years, Asia-Pacific expanded its shrimp pond area by over 200,000 hectares, reaching this milestone in 2024. Production systems require actives with short half-lives so that dissolved-oxygen and microbiome balance hold steady. Premium formulations built around imazamox and low-dose copper complexes now command up to 30% price uplifts over generic glyphosate. Governments in China and Vietnam link loan guarantees to certified “water-safe” inputs, reinforcing demand for specialized products.
Emergence of Bio-Based Chelation Carriers Improving Copper-Herbicide Efficacy
Citric acid and nitrilotriacetic acid carriers boost copper uptake in submerged weeds and lower metal accumulation in sediments, directly addressing ecological concerns. Early adopters in Florida and the Netherlands report 20% lower retreatment frequency, supporting premium pricing models. Suppliers with proprietary chelation technology anticipat high gross margins and robust intellectual-property protection.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stringent toxicological re-registration requirements | -1.3% | Global; strictest in European Union and North America | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Price compression from generic glyphosate and diquat | -1.1% | Global; most intense in price-sensitive markets | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| End-user preference for mechanical harvesting in high-value lakes | -0.8% | North America and Europe | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Activist litigation slowing permit approvals | -0.7% | North America and European Union | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Stringent Toxicological Re-Registration Requirements
Updated atrazine limits of 9.7 µg/L and European residue thresholds of 0.01 mg/kg have raised the data-generation bar, pushing compliance costs toward USD 10 million per active ingredient[1]Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “EPA Announces Update on Atrazine,” epa.gov . Smaller registrants face exit decisions, narrowing product shelves, and intensifying reliance on a handful of compliant molecules. The review cycles also delay innovation roll-outs, reducing the near-term availability of novel modes of action.
Price Compression from Generic Glyphosate and Diquat Oversupply
Market prices for glyphosate collapsed from USD 16-17 per gallon to around USD 4 by mid-2023 compared to the previous year after Chinese factories restarted post-pandemic. Inventory continued to clear through 2024, with spot quotes hovering between USD 4 and USD 5 in most Gulf Coast terminals, keeping the discount over premium selective herbicides wide. Diquat followed a similar arc. Oversupply stemming from Chinese and Indian capacity forced delivered prices to near USD 7 per gallon in late 2023 and remained under USD 8 through 2024 as distributors offloaded stocks. Manufacturers of branded formulations struggle to defend price points, and several opted to cancel registrations of slow-moving labels rather than pay annual maintenance fees. The compression squeezes gross margins and diverts cash that could fund research on novel modes of action, thereby slowing innovation cycles.
Segment Analysis
By Product Type: Glyphosate Dominance Faces Imazamox Challenge
Glyphosate controlled 42% of the aquatic herbicides market share in 2024 due to proven broad-spectrum efficacy. Yet falling prices and environmental scrutiny erode its value, allowing imazamox to chart an 11.8% CAGR through 2030. The selective profile of imazamox supports fisheries and drinking-water applications, attracting agencies willing to pay for minimal non-target impact. Additional segments such as 2,4-D and triclopyr hold niche positions; 2,4-D remains favored in drainage canals, while triclopyr excels against woody shoreline species.
A smaller but vital share belongs to imazapyr and diquat. Imazapyr is indispensable in large reservoirs where systemic control is essential, whereas diquat’s rapid burn-down provides immediate navigational relief despite price pressure from Chinese outputs. Suppliers that offer dual-pack options combining diquat with copper chelates can capture maintenance contracts seeking both algaecide and herbicide benefits.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Mode of Action: Non-Selective Herbicides Lead Despite Selective Growth
Non-selective formulations represented 59% of the aquatic herbicides market size in 2024 by serving as workhorses for full-lake renovations. Broad-spectrum products remain the first line of attack against dense monocultures before shifting to maintenance programs. Selective chemistry is nevertheless advancing at a 10.9% CAGR, fueled by recreational-lake boards and environmental-impact assessments. The 2024 Lake George ProcellaCOR treatment achieved milfoil control without harming native species, validating the cost premium for precise tools.[2]
Market segmentation by mode of action highlights clear user preferences shaped by application goals and regulatory constraints. Agricultural water bodies tend to favor non-selective herbicides for broad vegetation control, ensuring maximum water flow and storage capacity. In contrast, recreational and conservation areas increasingly prefer selective approaches that help maintain ecological balance. This difference is most evident in drinking water reservoirs, where selective herbicides reduce treatment needs and ease consumer concerns about chemical residues.
By Application Method: Foliar Applications Dominate as Submersed Injection Gains Momentum
Foliar spraying held 54% of the aquatic herbicides market size in 2024, owing to its ease of deployment and equipment availability. Municipal crews trained on terrestrial boom rigs can pivot quickly to shoreline spraying. Submersed injection is moving at a 10.1% CAGR as contractors adopt low-drift hoses and weighted lines that place actives directly in vegetative zones. Studies show foliar pathways lose 20–25% of active ingredients to the water column, and direct injection lowers total loadings while boosting end-of-season biomass reductions.
Training and certification requirements are evolving to support the adoption of submersed injection, with regulatory agencies creating specialized applicator categories for precision aquatic treatments. This move toward professionalization gives service providers who invest in advanced equipment and operator training a competitive edge, while also creating entry barriers that help established players protect their market position.
By End-User Industry: Agricultural Water Bodies Lead While Aquaculture Accelerates
Agricultural water bodies held 38% of the aquatic herbicides market share in 2024, underpinning the aquatic herbicides market size. Stable funding from crop-support agencies ensures baseline demand. The fisheries and aquaculture segment is on course for a 9.6% CAGR as shrimp and finfish farms expand; operators require low-residue products that safeguard stock health. Recreational facilities maintain steady purchases tied to seasonal tourism, whereas industrial utilities increasingly outsource to integrated vegetation service providers.
Market dynamics across end-user segments show distinct purchasing patterns and decision-making processes. Agricultural water bodies usually rely on institutional purchasing through irrigation districts and agricultural cooperatives, which opens opportunities for volume-based pricing and long-term supply agreements. Aquaculture operations, on the other hand, need specialized technical support and quick response capabilities, favoring suppliers with local presence and aquatic expertise. Recreational water bodies involve more complex stakeholder dynamics, including environmental groups, tourism interests, and regulatory agencies, requiring suppliers to demonstrate both environmental compatibility and community engagement.
By Formulation: Liquid Concentrates Dominate Despite Granular Innovation
Liquid concentrates capture 66% of volume on the strength of established supply chains and dosing flexibility. Granular forms, growing at 9.9% CAGR, find favor in remote reservoirs where single-pass treatments minimize boat time. Tablet and briquette options thrive in golf-course ponds, offering controlled release without continuous onsite labor. Suppliers investing in biodegradable polymers align with tightening sediment standards and can gain early-mover loyalty from environmentally sensitive buyers.
These formulations offer extended activity periods and reduced application frequency, particularly valuable in remote locations where repeated treatments are logistically challenging. Water-soluble concentrates and emulsifiable concentrates serve specialized applications where rapid dissolution or enhanced penetration is required, while tablet and compressed briquette formulations provide convenient dosing for smaller-scale applications. The development of biodegradable polymer carriers is enhancing granular formulation performance while addressing environmental persistence concerns that have historically limited adoption in sensitive aquatic environments.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Geography Analysis
North America remains the largest region with 45% of the market share, reflecting decades of programmatic spending and clear regulatory pathways. The Environmental Protection Agency’s expedited review for reduced-risk molecules promises steadier product launches, yet high-profile lawsuits in Lake Tahoe and Lake George underscore escalating public scrutiny. Local lake associations now earmark reserve funds for expert environmental assessments, stimulating demand for premium, selective herbicides.
Europe enforces tight residue rules that disqualify several legacy actives, but the blue economy grants channel new money into ecosystem-based approaches. Nordic agencies, for instance, pair aquatic herbicides with citizen-science monitoring apps to document native species recovery, encouraging selective formulations. The ban on metribuzin and tritosulfuron elevates substitutes compliant with the European Green Deal.
Asia-Pacific is the fastest-expanding territory, advancing at an 8.40% CAGR. China’s shrimp pond coverage alone stresses freshwater resources, prompting provincial subsidies for water-safe chemical inputs. India’s registration of 416 products in the first half of 2024 shows growing regulatory capacity, although individual state rules still require bespoke label adjustments. Suppliers that open local formulation plants avoid import tariffs and expedite tender eligibility.
Competitive Landscape
The aquatic herbicides market shows moderate concentration. The top five suppliers hold roughly 61% of revenue, meaning oligopolistic features coexist with regional fragmentation. Large incumbents leverage regulatory experience and technical service crews to secure statewide contracts. Mid-tier challengers carve space through cost leadership and targeted formulations for local weed spectra. Generic manufacturers bulk up by offering value packs of commodity glyphosate and diquat at prices retailers use as traffic drivers.
Market entry barriers differ widely across regions and application segments, shaping unique competitive landscapes. In North America, established players tend to have the advantage thanks to strong regulatory portfolios and technical support. In contrast, emerging markets create openings for cost-focused competitors offering simpler products. Aquatic applications, in particular, pose complex challenges that naturally limit new entrants, protecting the position of incumbents—especially in specialized areas that demand deep technical expertise and strict regulatory compliance.
Innovation divides the field. Leaders push reduced-risk molecules and precision hardware bundles; challengers focus on cost-optimized generics. Patent portfolios around chelation carriers and drone-integration software create durable moats. Voluntary cancellations of older labels, such as diquat products dropped in late 2024, open shelf space for differentiated entries. Market newcomers developing microbial bioherbicides attract venture capital, but scaling from pilot ponds to commercial acreages remains a hurdle.
Aquatic Herbicides Industry Leaders
-
SePRO Corporation
-
BASF SE
-
Syngenta AG
-
Nufarm Limited
-
UPL Limited
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- November 2024: Nufarm launched Oxbow herbicide and announced revenue ambitions of USD 3.8-3.9 billion by FY 26. The new active slots into selective aquatic programs, validating growing buyer preference for narrow-spectrum solutions that meet blue-economy funding criteria.
- August 2024: The Environmental Protection Agency finalized its Herbicide Strategy, adding runoff-mitigation standards that favor submersed-injection techniques. Applicator training firms reported a 25% spike in course enrollments, signaling that contractors are preparing to adopt compliant equipment.
- July 2024: Sumitomo Chemical gained Argentine approval for Rapidicil, targeting annual sales of 100 billion yen (USD 0.75 billion) by 2026. This approval enables the company to begin commercial distribution in one of South America's key agricultural markets.
Global Aquatic Herbicides Market Report Scope
| Glyphosate |
| 2,4-D |
| Imazamox |
| Imazapyr |
| Triclopyr |
| Diquat |
| Selective Herbicides |
| Non-Selective Herbicides |
| Foliar Application |
| Submersed Injection |
| Agricultural Water Bodies |
| Recreational Water Bodies |
| Fisheries and Aquaculture |
| Liquid Concentrates |
| Granular/Pelletized |
| Tablet/Compressed Briquettes |
| Water Soluble Concentrates |
| Emulsifiable Concentrates |
| North America | United States |
| Canada | |
| Rest of North America | |
| South America | Brazil |
| Argentina | |
| Rest of South America | |
| Europe | Germany |
| France | |
| United Kingdom | |
| Russia | |
| Rest of Europe | |
| Asia-Pacific | China |
| India | |
| Japan | |
| Australia | |
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | |
| Middle East | Saudi Arabia |
| United Arab Emirates | |
| Rest of Middle East | |
| Africa | South Africa |
| Egypt | |
| Rest of Africa |
| By Product Type | Glyphosate | |
| 2,4-D | ||
| Imazamox | ||
| Imazapyr | ||
| Triclopyr | ||
| Diquat | ||
| By Mode of Action | Selective Herbicides | |
| Non-Selective Herbicides | ||
| By Application Method | Foliar Application | |
| Submersed Injection | ||
| By End-User Industry | Agricultural Water Bodies | |
| Recreational Water Bodies | ||
| Fisheries and Aquaculture | ||
| By Formulation | Liquid Concentrates | |
| Granular/Pelletized | ||
| Tablet/Compressed Briquettes | ||
| Water Soluble Concentrates | ||
| Emulsifiable Concentrates | ||
| By Geography (Value) | North America | United States |
| Canada | ||
| Rest of North America | ||
| South America | Brazil | |
| Argentina | ||
| Rest of South America | ||
| Europe | Germany | |
| France | ||
| United Kingdom | ||
| Russia | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| Asia-Pacific | China | |
| India | ||
| Japan | ||
| Australia | ||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||
| Middle East | Saudi Arabia | |
| United Arab Emirates | ||
| Rest of Middle East | ||
| Africa | South Africa | |
| Egypt | ||
| Rest of Africa | ||
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the current value of the aquatic herbicides market?
The aquatic herbicides market size is USD 0.83 billion in 2025.
Which product category is growing fastest?
Imazamox leads growth at an 11.8% CAGR through 2030 due to its selective action.
Why are selective herbicides gaining traction?
Stricter environmental rules and ecosystem-restoration projects favor options that spare native plants while removing invasives.
How are drones influencing application methods?
Drone-spraying paired with digital bathymetry cuts herbicide use by nearly 50% and enables precise targeting in complex lake geometries.
Page last updated on: