Von Willebrand Disease Treatment Market Size and Share

Von Willebrand Disease Treatment Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Von Willebrand Disease Treatment Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Von Willebrand disease treatment market stood at USD 2.40 billion in 2025 and is on track to reach USD 3.29 billion by 2030, translating into a 6.5% CAGR over the forecast window. Uptake of curative gene therapies, rapid adoption of AI-supported diagnostics, and payer acceptance of value-based reimbursement are accelerating revenue growth, while hospital formularies increasingly favor recombinant, pathogen-free concentrates over plasma-derived options. Expansion of federal patient-assistance schemes in North America, wider newborn genetic screening in Asia-Pacific, and fast-track review of subcutaneous desmopressin nano-formulations also deepen addressable demand. Gene therapies such as Pfizer’s BEQVEZ and CSL Behring’s HEMGENIX, both cleared in 2024–2025, create the prospect of one-time interventions that reduce lifelong factor consumption. Despite strong momentum, the Von Willebrand disease treatment market still contends with under-diagnosis in low-income geographies, high upfront gene-therapy costs, and temperature-sensitive supply chains for plasma products.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By disease type, Type 1 held 72.35% of the Von Willebrand disease market share in 2024; Acquired VWD is forecast to grow at 11.25% CAGR to 2030.
  • By treatment type, VWF/FVIII combination concentrates led with 46.53% revenue share in 2024; recombinant VWF-only concentrates are expanding at a 13.85% CAGR through 2030.
  • By route of administration, intravenous therapy commanded 70.62% of the Von Willebrand disease market size in 2024, whereas subcutaneous delivery is rising at 13.52% CAGR to 2030.
  • By geography, North America accounted for 38.82% share in 2024; Asia-Pacific shows the fastest regional CAGR at 10.61% through 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Disease Type: Type 1 Dominance Drives Market Stability

Type 1 VWD generated 72.35% of global revenue in 2024, anchoring the Von Willebrand disease treatment market size for that year. Prevalent mild phenotypes rely on affordable desmopressin, sustaining predictable volumes. Acquired VWD, while smaller today, delivers the fastest expansion at 11.25% CAGR through 2030 as oncologists and cardiologists test patients pre-procedure. Type 2 sub-variants together add clinical complexity because they require concentrate prophylaxis; Type 2A cases especially benefit from recombinant VWF-only products that restore high-molecular-weight multimers, reducing annual bleed rate.

The severe but rare Type 3 cohort incurs disproportionate costs due to intensive factor infusions and orthopedic surgeries, highlighting reimbursement challenges in emerging economies. Long-term center experience shows persistent under-diagnosis across all types, prompting calls for registry expansion and payer support for genetic testing[3]HemaSphere, “Rare Bleeding Disorders,” journals.lww.com. Growing awareness of drug-induced VWD in aging populations further enlarges the Von Willebrand disease treatment market.

Von Willebrand Disease Treatment Market: Market Share by Disease Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Treatment Type: Recombinant Innovation Challenges Traditional Concentrates

Combination VWF/FVIII concentrates retained 46.53% of revenue in 2024, reflecting broad clinical familiarity and dual factor coverage. Yet recombinant VWF-only lines are rising fast at 13.85% CAGR, signaling a decisive procurement shift. Hospitals seek pathogen-free products amid heightened pharmacovigilance, and value-based contracts incentivize bleed reduction, accelerating recombinant adoption in the Von Willebrand disease treatment market. Desmopressin remains key for Type 1 management, though nasal-spray adherence issues motivate investment in subcutaneous nano-formulations.

Antifibrinolytics such as tranexamic acid, alongside topical agents, provide adjunct control for mucosal bleeds. Curative gene therapies are emerging, following BEQVEZ proof-of-concept, and they could reset demand profiles by reducing recurrent concentrate use. Octapharma’s wilate prophylaxis label broadening forces competitors to demonstrate comparative efficacy, intensifying innovation within the Von Willebrand disease treatment market.

By Route of Administration: Subcutaneous Innovation Transforms Patient Experience

Intravenous infusion remained dominant with 70.62% share in 2024 because clinical protocols and infusion-center infrastructure are well established. However, subcutaneous delivery grows at 13.52% CAGR, reflecting demand for self-administration. Alhemo’s 2024 approval confirms daily subcutaneous prophylaxis can match IV efficacy, freeing patients from port-access hurdles. Intranasal DDAVP supports pediatric and mild cases, but variable absorption limits adult use. Oral antifibrinolytics remain supplemental, with research underway into oral desmopressin bio-enhancers that could further diversify options.

Patient-reported-outcome studies show higher satisfaction scores and lower missed-dose rates with subcutaneous regimens, implying a structural shift in the Von Willebrand disease treatment market. Controlled-release injections designed for weekly or monthly dosing aim to displace traditional IV prophylaxis in high-income geographies.

Von Willebrand Disease Treatment Market: Market Share by Route of Administration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

Geography Analysis

North America contributed 38.82% of 2024 revenue, underpinned by 340B discounts and comprehensive treatment-center networks that guarantee product access. Gene therapy reimbursement frameworks emerge first in the United States, enabling earlier adoption and supporting premium pricing. Canada trails slightly due to provincial formulary reviews but benefits from centralized plasma procurement.

Europe exhibits high recombinant uptake as national payers demand virus-safe concentrates, yet stringent health-technology assessments delay some novel therapies. Western European markets negotiate risk-sharing deals for gene therapy, tying payment to sustained factor independence, which shapes purchasing dynamics in the Von Willebrand disease treatment market. Eastern Europe faces tighter budgets and slower diagnostic rollout, creating a two-tier landscape within the region.

Asia-Pacific leads growth with a 10.61% CAGR through 2030 because regulators are streamlining review pathways and governments are investing in local manufacturing. China, India, and South-Korea expand newborn-screening panels and subsidize concentrate imports, driving double-digit volume gains. South America, notably Brazil, leverages centralized purchasing and clinical-protocol standardization to broaden access despite economic constraints. In contrast, Middle East and Africa progress is hampered by diagnostic and cold-chain deficits, although recombinant price declines could unlock latent demand later in the forecast.

Von Willebrand Disease Treatment Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The Von Willebrand disease treatment market remains moderately consolidated, with CSL Behring, Takeda, and Octapharma controlling the bulk of plasma-derived concentrate supply. Their vertical integration from plasma collection to finished biologics ensures scale economies and supply security. Market entrants focus on recombinant innovation, subcutaneous delivery, and curative modalities to differentiate. CSL Behring expands beyond plasma through HEMGENIX gene therapy, while Sanofi uses RNA-interference candidate Qfitlia to address inhibitor populations.

Strategic alliances proliferate. Plasma leaders license AI-driven dosing software to embed value-based outcomes in sales pitches. Gene-therapy developers forge risk-sharing accords with U.S. Medicaid programs to expedite patient onboarding. Device makers collaborate with concentrate suppliers to co-package subcutaneous autoinjectors, simplifying home use. Competitive intensity therefore shifts from pure volume toward clinical-outcome differentiation, reshaping commercial models across the Von Willebrand disease treatment market.

White-space opportunities include diagnostic platforms for low-income regions, extended-half-life recombinant constructs, and cold-chain-free formulations. Barriers to entry encompass plasma-fractionation capital cost, complex biologic approvals, and payer hesitancy around high upfront gene-therapy prices. Nonetheless, innovation and partnership depth suggest gradual dilution of incumbent share, bringing heightened rivalry through 2030.

Von Willebrand Disease Treatment Industry Leaders

  1. CSL Behring

  2. Grifols, S.A.

  3. Octapharma AG

  4. Bio Products Laboratory Ltd.

  5. Takeda (Shire)

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Von Willebrand Disease Treatment Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • February 2025: Hemab Therapeutics dosed the first participant in Velora Pioneer, its Phase 1/2 study of HMB-002, a subcutaneous therapy for VWD.
  • January 2025: Star Therapeutics received FDA Fast-Track designation for VGA039 in VWD.

Table of Contents for Von Willebrand Disease Treatment Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Growing Patient Assistance & Charitable?Access Schemes
    • 4.2.2 Rising Diagnosis From Wider Prophylactic Genetic Screening
    • 4.2.3 Increasing Hospital Adoption Of Recombinant VWF-Only Concentrates
    • 4.2.4 FDA Fast-Track For Sub-Cutaneous DDAVP Nano-Formulations
    • 4.2.5 Surge In Pay-For-Performance Hemophilia Centers Bundling VWD Care
    • 4.2.6 AI-Enabled Bleeding-Risk Decision Engines Integrated In EHRs
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Persistent Under-Diagnosis In Low-Income Geographies
    • 4.3.2 High Lifetime Therapy Cost Despite Biosimilar Entries
    • 4.3.3 Limited Cold-Chain Capacity For Plasma-Derived Products In Africa
    • 4.3.4 Regulatory Uncertainty Around Gene-Editing Trials For VWD
  • 4.4 Porter's Five Forces
    • 4.4.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.4.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.4.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

  • 5.1 By Disease Type
    • 5.1.1 Type 1
    • 5.1.2 Type 2 (2A, 2B, 2M, 2N)
    • 5.1.3 Type 3
    • 5.1.4 Acquired VWD
  • 5.2 By Treatment Type
    • 5.2.1 Desmopressin (DDAVP)
    • 5.2.2 VWF/FVIII Combination Concentrates
    • 5.2.3 Recombinant VWF-only Concentrates
    • 5.2.4 Antifibrinolytics (e.g., Tranexamic Acid)
    • 5.2.5 Topical & Adjunctive Agents
  • 5.3 By Route of Administration
    • 5.3.1 Intravenous
    • 5.3.2 Intranasal
    • 5.3.3 Oral
    • 5.3.4 Sub-cutaneous
  • 5.4 Geography
    • 5.4.1 North America
    • 5.4.1.1 United States
    • 5.4.1.2 Canada
    • 5.4.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.4.2 Europe
    • 5.4.2.1 Germany
    • 5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.2.3 France
    • 5.4.2.4 Italy
    • 5.4.2.5 Spain
    • 5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.3.1 China
    • 5.4.3.2 Japan
    • 5.4.3.3 India
    • 5.4.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.4.3.5 Australia
    • 5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.4 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.4.4.1 GCC
    • 5.4.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.4.4.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa
    • 5.4.5 South America
    • 5.4.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.4.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 CSL Behring
    • 6.3.2 Takeda (Shire)
    • 6.3.3 Octapharma AG
    • 6.3.4 Grifols SA
    • 6.3.5 Sanofi SA
    • 6.3.6 Pfizer Inc.
    • 6.3.7 Ferring Pharmaceuticals
    • 6.3.8 Bio Products Laboratory
    • 6.3.9 Bayer AG
    • 6.3.10 Novo Nordisk A/S
    • 6.3.11 Kedrion Biopharma
    • 6.3.12 LFB Group
    • 6.3.13 ADMA Biologics
    • 6.3.14 CSL Vifor
    • 6.3.15 Aptevo Therapeutics
    • 6.3.16 Kamada Ltd
    • 6.3.17 Biotest AG

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the von Willebrand disease (VWD) treatment market as all prescription medicinal products, plasma-derived, recombinant, synthetic or adjunctive, that are administered to prevent or control bleeding episodes in patients diagnosed with Type 1, Type 2 (2A, 2B, 2M, 2N), Type 3, or acquired VWD.

The review leaves out diagnostic assays, general hemostatic agents used for surgery-related bleeding unrelated to VWD, and pipeline gene therapies that are still in clinical trials.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Disease Type
    • Type 1
    • Type 2 (2A, 2B, 2M, 2N)
    • Type 3
    • Acquired VWD
  • By Treatment Type
    • Desmopressin (DDAVP)
    • VWF/FVIII Combination Concentrates
    • Recombinant VWF-only Concentrates
    • Antifibrinolytics (e.g., Tranexamic Acid)
    • Topical & Adjunctive Agents
  • By Route of Administration
    • Intravenous
    • Intranasal
    • Oral
    • Sub-cutaneous
  • Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • GCC
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East and Africa
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Interviews with hematologists, hospital pharmacists, and payer advisers across North America, Europe, and Asia helped validate treated-patient ratios, average annual IU usage, and the speed at which prophylactic regimens are replacing on-demand care. Follow-up surveys with advocacy groups clarified self-infusion uptake and out-of-pocket hurdles.

Desk Research

Analysts began with curated medical-science databases, combing peer-reviewed journals such as Blood and Haemophilia for prevalence ratios and dose-response data. We added regulatory statistics from the FDA's Biologics License Application archive, EMA's Community Register, and reimbursement tariffs published by CMS and Germany's G-DRG catalog. Trade groups, for example, the World Federation of Hemophilia, provided annual patient and treatment-days counts, while import-export trends were parsed through Volza shipment data to benchmark concentrate flows. Company 10-Ks, investor decks, and Factiva press archives enriched price-mix and launch timelines. These sources, though illustrative, are not exhaustive; numerous additional public records underpin the evidence base.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A prevalence-to-treated-cohort top-down model anchors our baseline. Diagnosed prevalence per geography is multiplied by treatment penetration and average annual dose to yield volume, which is then priced using cleansed ASP ranges. Supplier roll-ups and sampled tender data supply a selective bottom-up cross-check, letting us adjust outliers. Key variables include newborn screening coverage, prophylaxis share, shift from plasma to recombinant VWF, mean IU per infusion, and regional ASP dispersion. Multivariate regression, coupled with scenario analysis for gene-therapy arrival, projects figures to 2030; missing micro-data are bridged with clinically accepted dose bands and regional payer caps.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs pass anomaly screens against independent hospital utilization audits and customs trends before a two-step analyst review. The dataset refreshes annually, with interim updates whenever material events, such as a new biologic approval or reimbursement change, trigger a re-run.

Why Our Von Willebrand Disease Treatment Baseline Stands Up to Scrutiny

Published estimates vary because firms pick different product baskets, patient funnels, and refresh cadences.

Key gap drivers include inclusion of diagnostic revenues, absence of penetration adjustments for emerging economies, or single-source ASP assumptions. Mordor's disciplined scope definition, dual-sourced volume checks, and annual refresh mitigate these pitfalls.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 2.40 B Mordor Intelligence -
USD 2.51 B Global Consultancy A Bundles diagnostic kit sales and counts prophylaxis uptake at 100 % in developed nations
USD 1.88 B Industry Association B Uses reported sales from five majors only; omits hospital-compounding and regional generics

In sum, clients gain a balanced, transparent baseline from Mordor Intelligence, one that traces every dollar to clear epidemiologic and pricing variables and can be repeated or stressed without hidden assumptions.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the Von Willebrand disease treatment market?

The market reached USD 2.40 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow to USD 3.29 billion by 2030 at a 6.5% CAGR.

Which disease segment generates the largest revenue?

Type 1 VWD accounts for 72.35% of global revenue, reflecting its high prevalence and reliance on cost-effective desmopressin therapy.

How fast is the recombinant VWF-only concentrate segment growing?

Recombinant VWF-only products are expanding at a 13.85% CAGR, outpacing plasma-derived options due to safety and efficacy advantages.

Why is Asia-Pacific the fastest-growing regional market?

Government investment in screening and regulatory convergence initiatives produce a 10.61% CAGR, making Asia-Pacific the most dynamic region.

What role do gene therapies play in future growth?

Recently approved one-time treatments like BEQVEZ and HEMGENIX can reduce lifelong factor use, creating new revenue streams while reshaping payer economics.

Page last updated on:

Von Willebrand Disease Treatment Report Snapshots