Lifescience Membrane Technology Market Size and Share

Lifescience Membrane Technology Market Summary
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Lifescience Membrane Technology Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The lifescience membrane technology market size stood at USD 6.08 billion in 2025 and is on track to reach USD 7.89 billion by 2030, advancing at a 5.34% CAGR. The lifescience membrane technology market continues to benefit from rising biologics volumes, the move toward continuous processing, and stricter global purity standards that favor high-selectivity filtration. Consolidation among filtration specialists and bioprocess suppliers is accelerating, with large players absorbing niche innovators to secure end-to-end offerings. Rapid uptake of single-use assemblies shortens batch changeovers, while AI-driven membrane design unlocks higher flux without sacrificing integrity. Supply-chain constraints for PVDF and the impending PFAS phase-outs are nudging users toward ceramic or hybrid solutions, which promise longer service life and smaller environmental footprints.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By technology, microfiltration led with 41.22% of the lifescience membrane technology market share in 2024; nanofiltration is projected to grow at a 9.36% CAGR through 2030. 
  • By material, polymeric membranes accounted for 81.44% share of the lifescience membrane technology market size in 2024, whereas ceramic membranes are expected to expand at 8.47% CAGR. 
  • By application, pharmaceutical manufacturing captured 37.42% share of the lifescience membrane technology market size in 2024, and cell & gene therapy is forecast to post a 9.66% CAGR by 2030. 
  • By end user, pharmaceutical companies held 44.84% share of the lifescience membrane technology market size in 2024, while CDMOs & CROs are set to advance at 9.03% CAGR. 
  • By product type, membrane filters controlled 51.49% of the lifescience membrane technology market share in 2024; single-use TFF systems exhibit the fastest pace at 8.25% CAGR. 
  • By geography, North America commanded 33.58% of lifescience membrane technology market share in 2024, while Asia-Pacific records the strongest 7.67% CAGR outlook.

Segment Analysis

By Technology: Microfiltration Dominance Faces Nanofiltration Disruption

Microfiltration secured 41.22% lifescience membrane technology market share in 2024, owing to its entrenched role in cell harvest and clarification. Demand stays resilient as perfusion culture scales, yet nanofiltration, with a 9.36% CAGR outlook, positions itself as the go-to for high-resolution viral clearance and solvent exchange. The lifescience membrane technology market size for nanofiltration will likely triple by 2030 as plants retrofit downstream lines to meet Annex 1 viral safety clauses. Ultrafiltration remains the workhorse for protein concentration, whereas reverse osmosis serves a niche for water-for-injection (WFI) and solvent recycling. Asahi Kasei’s WFI membrane system showcases energy savings over thermal distillation, signaling room for innovation even in mature categories.

Providers now ship hybrid skids that stack micro-, ultra-, and nanofiltration in sequence, shrinking footprint and cutting cleanroom HVAC loads. Chromatography or affinity membranes augment such stacks, capturing specific impurities inline. Early adopters report 15% shorter campaign cycles, stirring broader interest. The advance of electrodialysis and ion-exchange membranes stays subdued because of their power draws, though they retain value in solvent-intensive API plants.

Lifescience Membrane Technology Market: Market Share by Technology
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Material: Polymeric Leadership Challenged by Ceramic Innovation

Polymeric substrates captured 81.44% of lifescience membrane technology market size in 2024 due to low cost and proven scalability. Yet ceramic variants post an 8.47% CAGR, riding PFAS backlash and offering chemical resilience for aggressive cleaning regimens. Mixed-matrix designs blending inorganic fillers into polymer backbones attempt to deliver the best of both, but complex fabrication hampers mass rollout. Sustainability drivers now influence purchasing, with buyers rewarding solvent-free casting and recyclable frames. The lifescience membrane technology market is witnessing pilot lots of bio-based membranes; performance parity remains a hurdle but regulatory incentives could tilt the field after 2028.

Longer service life offsets ceramics’ premium, especially in continuous-manufacturing suites that avoid scheduled shutdowns. Vendors tout total-cost-of-ownership calculators to demonstrate savings. Users balancing CapEx limits with new PFAS liability hesitate, leaving scope for dual-sourcing strategies that keep polymeric lines for low-risk buffers and ceramics for harsh CIP zones.

By Application: Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Leads While Cell & Gene Therapy Surges

Pharmaceutical manufacturing retained 37.42% of lifescience membrane technology market size in 2024 as membranes permeate nearly every unit operation from media prep to final fill. Meanwhile, cell & gene therapy displays a 9.66% CAGR, requiring bespoke hollow-fiber configurations to safeguard viral particle integrity. Diagnostics and life-science research segments grow steadily as labs proliferate in emerging economies, but command lower unit prices. Dialysis membranes remain steady through demographic aging, yet price competition caps revenue upside.

Continuous-processing units merge reaction and purification, placing membranes center-stage. Factory-in-a-box concepts rely on compact, multi-task modules to maintain sterility across local climates. Such architectures enlarge addressable demand in markets previously constrained by infrastructure deficits, lifting overall lifescience membrane technology market growth.

By End User: Pharmaceutical Companies Dominate as CDMOs Accelerate

Pharmaceutical companies controlled 44.84% market share in 2024, sustained by vertically integrated biologics pipelines. CDMOs & CROs clock the highest 9.03% CAGR as outsourcing becomes mainstream for specialized modalities. Academic and research institutes catalyze early innovation, often partnering with CDMOs to scale proof-of-concept batches. Hospitals and clinical labs represent a budding niche, leveraging point-of-care compounding units fitted with disposable micro-filters.

Collaborative models proliferate: Sartorius and LFB BIOMANUFACTURING aligned to speed cell-line development using high-throughput membrane analytics, exemplifying cross-entity synergies that compress development timelines. Such arrangements distribute technology risk while widening market access for membrane vendors.

Lifescience Membrane Technology Market: Market Share by End User
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Product Type: Membrane Filters Lead While Single-Use TFF Systems Gain Momentum

Membrane filters represented 51.49% lifescience membrane technology market share in 2024, led by flat-sheet and disc forms integral to lab-scale tasks. Single-use TFF modules grow at 8.25% CAGR, driven by gene therapy expansions and the desire to skip steam-in-place cycles. Capsule and cartridge formats thrive in pilot plants, whereas hollow-fiber modules dominate commercial biologics lines for their surface-area efficiency. Repligen’s automated TFF skid shows how embedded analytics cut manual oversight and enhance consistency.

Transfer and blotting membranes serve diagnostic kits and Western blots; revenue growth remains flat but stable. Smart modules that pair filtration with inline spectrophotometry hint at future value-add paths, elevating barriers for commodity entrants and sustaining premium pricing in the lifescience membrane technology industry.

Geography Analysis

North America held 33.58% of lifescience membrane technology market share in 2024, underpinned by dense biotech clusters, generous federal grants, and fast regulatory turnaround. Investors favor domestic manufacturing to de-risk supply, as illustrated by Johnson & Johnson’s USD 2 billion biologics facility in North Carolina slated to create 420 jobs. Continuous-manufacturing pilots gain traction thanks to accessible automation suppliers and established cold-chain networks.

Asia-Pacific logs the fastest 7.67% CAGR, propelled by national policies that promote vaccine sovereignty and biopharma clusters. China funnels subsidies toward single-use lines, while South Korea lures multinationals with tax breaks, evidenced by MilliporeSigma’s USD 300 million plant in Daejeon. Local production of base polymers and ceramics helps temper cost volatility, further lifting the lifescience membrane technology market penetration.

Europe maintains steady demand through 2030, championed by a robust regulatory framework and strong sustainability mandates that favor low-carbon ceramics. Government incentives for PFAS replacement accelerate the swap-out cycle, padding revenue for vendors able to validate new materials swiftly. Smaller regions—Middle East & Africa and South America—show emerging interest; uptake is tempered by limited GMP infrastructure and currency fluctuations, but turnkey pod solutions promise to bridge gaps, especially for domestic vaccine fill-finish.

Lifescience Membrane Technology Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The lifescience membrane technology market is moderately consolidated. Strategic acquisitions mark the period, notably Thermo Fisher’s USD 4.1 billion purchase of Solventum’s filtration arm to widen its biologics toolkit. Merck KGaA, Danaher, and Sartorius leverage vertical integration to offer membranes, housings, sensors, and data-analytics suites under single contracts.

Digital twins, predictive maintenance, and AI-driven membrane tailoring emerge as differentiation levers. Smaller innovators specializing in ceramic or hybrid matrices attract partnerships for accelerated market entry. Meanwhile, supply-side risk around PVDF pushes large buyers to dual-source between polymeric and ceramic offerings, broadening the supplier mix yet rewarding those with global manufacturing footprints and robust quality records.

Patent filings in gradient pore structures and solvent-free casting processes rose 18% during 2024, signaling continued R&D investment. Start-ups focusing on recyclable or bio-based membranes chase sustainable-procurement budgets, though they must qualify performance under real-world multiproduct regimes to gain share. Overall, pricing power rests with suppliers who couple superior flux with exhaustive regulatory support.

Lifescience Membrane Technology Industry Leaders

  1. Merck KGaA

  2. Danaher

  3. Sartorius AG

  4. Thermo Fisher Scientific

  5. Asahi Kasei Corp.

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Lifescience Membrane Technology Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • July 2025: Asahi Kasei Life Science Corp. began operating independently, scaling Planova virus-filter capacity in the U.S. and Japan while broadening contract R&D capabilities.
  • February 2025: Thermo Fisher Scientific agreed to acquire Solventum’s Purification & Filtration business for USD 4.1 billion, aiming to close by year-end.
  • October 2024: Asahi Kasei Medical released Planova FG1, offering seven-times higher flux than the BioEX predecessor for faster biotherapeutic filtration.

Table of Contents for Lifescience Membrane Technology Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Growing Biopharma Production Volumes
    • 4.2.2 Stringent Purity Regulations In Drug Manufacturing
    • 4.2.3 Surge In Single-Use Bioprocessing Platforms
    • 4.2.4 Rising R&D In Cell & Gene Therapy
    • 4.2.5 AI-Optimized Custom Membrane Design
    • 4.2.6 Localized “Factory-In-A-Box” Drug Production
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Membrane Fouling & Short Service Life
    • 4.3.2 High Capital Cost Of Advanced Systems
    • 4.3.3 Shortage Of High-Grade Polymer Precursors
    • 4.3.4 Unclear Rules On Membrane Waste Disposal
  • 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technology Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value-USD)

  • 5.1 By Technology
    • 5.1.1 Microfiltration
    • 5.1.2 Ultrafiltration
    • 5.1.3 Nanofiltration
    • 5.1.4 Reverse Osmosis
    • 5.1.5 Chromatography & Affinity Membranes
    • 5.1.6 Electrodialysis & Ion Exchange
  • 5.2 By Material
    • 5.2.1 Polymeric
    • 5.2.2 Ceramic
    • 5.2.3 Mixed-matrix / Hybrid
  • 5.3 By Application
    • 5.3.1 Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
    • 5.3.2 Bioprocessing & Biologics
    • 5.3.3 Medical Devices & Dialysis
    • 5.3.4 Diagnostics & Life-science Research
    • 5.3.5 Laboratory Water Purification
  • 5.4 By End-user
    • 5.4.1 Biopharma Companies
    • 5.4.2 Pharmaceutical Companies
    • 5.4.3 CDMOs & CROs
    • 5.4.4 Academic & Research Institutes
    • 5.4.5 Hospitals & Clinical Labs
  • 5.5 By Product Type
    • 5.5.1 Membrane Filters (flat-sheet, disc)
    • 5.5.2 Capsule / Cartridge Filters
    • 5.5.3 Hollow-Fiber Modules
    • 5.5.4 Single-use TFF Systems
    • 5.5.5 Transfer / Blotting Membranes
  • 5.6 By Geography
    • 5.6.1 North America
    • 5.6.1.1 United States
    • 5.6.1.2 Canada
    • 5.6.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.6.2 Europe
    • 5.6.2.1 Germany
    • 5.6.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.6.2.3 France
    • 5.6.2.4 Italy
    • 5.6.2.5 Spain
    • 5.6.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.6.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.3.1 China
    • 5.6.3.2 Japan
    • 5.6.3.3 India
    • 5.6.3.4 Australia
    • 5.6.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.6.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.4 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.6.4.1 GCC
    • 5.6.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.6.4.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa
    • 5.6.5 South America
    • 5.6.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.6.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.6.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Merck KGaA
    • 6.3.2 Danaher
    • 6.3.3 Sartorius AG
    • 6.3.4 Thermo Fisher Scientific
    • 6.3.5 GE Healthcare
    • 6.3.6 Asahi Kasei Corp.
    • 6.3.7 Toray Industries
    • 6.3.8 DuPont (FilmTec)
    • 6.3.9 Koch Membrane Systems
    • 6.3.10 Alfa Laval
    • 6.3.11 Corning Inc.
    • 6.3.12 W. L. Gore & Associates
    • 6.3.13 Repligen Corp.
    • 6.3.14 Parker Hannifin
    • 6.3.15 Graver Technologies
    • 6.3.16 Microdyn-Nadir (Mann+Hummel)
    • 6.3.17 Novasep
    • 6.3.18 Meissner Filtration Products
    • 6.3.19 Shimadzu Corp.
    • 6.3.20 Advantec MFS

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Global Lifescience Membrane Technology Market Report Scope

By Technology
Microfiltration
Ultrafiltration
Nanofiltration
Reverse Osmosis
Chromatography & Affinity Membranes
Electrodialysis & Ion Exchange
By Material
Polymeric
Ceramic
Mixed-matrix / Hybrid
By Application
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Bioprocessing & Biologics
Medical Devices & Dialysis
Diagnostics & Life-science Research
Laboratory Water Purification
By End-user
Biopharma Companies
Pharmaceutical Companies
CDMOs & CROs
Academic & Research Institutes
Hospitals & Clinical Labs
By Product Type
Membrane Filters (flat-sheet, disc)
Capsule / Cartridge Filters
Hollow-Fiber Modules
Single-use TFF Systems
Transfer / Blotting Membranes
By Geography
North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
Australia
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa GCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East and Africa
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
By Technology Microfiltration
Ultrafiltration
Nanofiltration
Reverse Osmosis
Chromatography & Affinity Membranes
Electrodialysis & Ion Exchange
By Material Polymeric
Ceramic
Mixed-matrix / Hybrid
By Application Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Bioprocessing & Biologics
Medical Devices & Dialysis
Diagnostics & Life-science Research
Laboratory Water Purification
By End-user Biopharma Companies
Pharmaceutical Companies
CDMOs & CROs
Academic & Research Institutes
Hospitals & Clinical Labs
By Product Type Membrane Filters (flat-sheet, disc)
Capsule / Cartridge Filters
Hollow-Fiber Modules
Single-use TFF Systems
Transfer / Blotting Membranes
By Geography North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
Australia
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa GCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East and Africa
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current value of the lifescience membrane technology market?

The market was valued at USD 6.08 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 7.89 billion by 2030.

Which technology segment leads revenue?

Microfiltration remains the largest, contributing 41.22% of 2024 revenue.

Which region is growing the fastest?

Asia-Pacific is projected to post a 7.67% CAGR through 2030.

Why are single-use TFF systems gaining popularity?

They eliminate cleaning validation, reduce cross-contamination risk, and align with flexible manufacturing needs.

How will PFAS regulations influence membrane materials?

Restrictions on PVDF drive interest in ceramic and hybrid membranes that avoid fluorinated polymers.

Which end-user segment shows the highest growth?

CDMOs & CROs exhibit a 9.03% CAGR as outsourcing of biologics production expands.

Page last updated on: