Battery Scrap Market Size and Share
Battery Scrap Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Battery Scrap Market size is estimated at USD 28.78 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 47.97 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 10.76% during the forecast period (2025-2030).
The expansion reflects the sector’s shift from a mature lead-acid focus to a broader lithium-ion recovery ecosystem, supported by surging electric-vehicle (EV) retirements, tighter producer-responsibility rules, and higher commodity prices that make secondary materials more attractive than mined supply. Commercial adoption of hydrometallurgical and direct-recycling processes raises metal yields while lowering energy use, and AI-enabled sorting systems are pushing processing accuracy toward 95%. At the same time, OEMs are tying up capacity through long-term offtake agreements that guarantee a market for recycled metals, thereby reducing margin risk for recyclers. Conversely, rapidly changing cell chemistries, mounting fire-safety costs, and fragmented reverse-logistics networks constrain profit potential and widen the performance gap between technology-focused players and traditional scrap handlers.
Key Report Takeaways
- By type, lead-acid batteries held 61.7% of the battery scrap market share in 2024, whereas lithium-ion scrap is projected to expand at a 22.5% CAGR through 2030, the fastest among all chemistries.
- By application, automotive batteries generated 53.5% of 2024 revenue, while stationary energy-storage systems are expected to grow at a 23.8% CAGR to 2030, the highest across end-uses.
- By end-user, dedicated recycling facilities controlled 46.0% of 2024 sales, but OEM take-back programs are forecast to rise at a 27.1% CAGR, outpacing every other user category.
Global Battery Scrap Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soaring EV-linked Li-ion volumes hitting end-of-life | 3.20% | Global, with concentration in China, EU, North America | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Mandatory producer-responsibility laws in EU, China, India | 2.10% | EU, China, India, expanding to other regions | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Growing black-mass spot prices improving recycler margins | 1.80% | Global, particularly Asia-Pacific and North America | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| OEM "closed-loop" offtake contracts | 1.50% | North America, EU, expanding to Asia-Pacific | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| AI-enabled scrap-stream triage boosting recovery yields | 0.90% | North America, EU, advanced facilities globally | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Stationary-storage repurposing delaying recycle flows | 0.70% | Global, concentrated in grid-scale storage markets | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Soaring EV-Linked Li-Ion Volumes Hitting End-of-Life
End-of-life volumes from first-generation EVs built between 2012 and 2015 are now entering recycling streams at scale, pushing global battery waste toward 11 million t annually by 2030. This inflow is concentrated in China, which accounts for more than half of worldwide EV sales and over 70% of lithium-ion recycling capacity. Recyclers that expand quickly in the region can lock in feedstock before volumes disperse globally. The influx coincides with process-efficiency gains that lift lithium, cobalt, and nickel recovery rates, further improving project economics. Yet capacity additions must be synchronized with geographic demand to avoid under-utilized plants that erode returns.
Mandatory Producer-Responsibility Laws in EU, China, India
Regulators are shifting collection costs from municipalities to manufacturers, guaranteeing higher throughput for certified recyclers. The EU Battery Regulation 2023/1542 sets a 63% portable-battery collection target in 2027, stepping up to 73% by 2030 and imposing a 50% lithium recovery floor by 2027.[1]“Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 of the European Parliament and of the Council,” europa.eu China requires battery producers to finance take-back networks, while India’s End-of-Life Vehicle EPR Rules 2025 apply similar obligations to automotive packs. Compliance timelines differ regionally, allowing early movers to replicate successful systems across new jurisdictions. Informal processors lacking permits face tightening enforcement, driving volume consolidation toward well-capitalized facilities.
Growing Black-Mass Spot Prices Improving Recycler Margins
High-grade black mass averaged USD 3,816 /t in 2024, and ternary-rich material topped USD 14,725 /t as buyers vied for recycled cobalt and nickel.[2]“Daily Black Mass Pricing,” shmet.com The widened premium over LFP-derived mass at USD 961 /t incentivizes recyclers to prioritize nickel-rich chemistries and to adopt sorting systems that separate packs by composition. However, spot-price volatility can compress firms' margins without hedging or long-term offtake contracts. Emerging standardized grades and trading platforms are adding liquidity, enabling recyclers to align sales strategies with real-time demand.
OEM Closed-Loop Offtake Contracts
Automakers are treating waste batteries as metal reservoirs. Tesla sources recycled nickel from Redwood Materials under a multi-year contract, while General Motors follows a similar model. Agreements often span 5-10 years and include volume and price-adjustment clauses that stabilize recycler cash flow. Some contracts extend to joint investment in processing lines, embedding recyclers deeper into OEM supply chains and de-risking capital expenditure. The trend accelerates circularity and enhances raw-material security for cell makers.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inefficient global reverse-logistics for end-of-life packs | -1.8% | Global, particularly cross-border transportation | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Volatile cobalt & nickel prices eroding re-seller profits | -1.2% | Global, concentrated in regions dependent on recycled metals | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Technology-lock risk from rapid cell-chemistry shifts | -0.9% | Global, particularly affecting specialized recyclers | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Fire-safety liabilities inflating insurance premiums | -0.7% | North America & EU, expanding to other regions | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Inefficient Global Reverse-Logistics for End-of-Life Packs
Reverse-logistics costs consume 15-25% of total recycling expense because lithium-ion batteries fall under UN3480 dangerous-goods rules that require special packaging and trained carriers. Urban collection points rarely align with plant locations, causing empty back-hauls that raise per-unit transport costs. Fragmented collection contracts add complexity, and cross-border shipments face additional declarations and transit insurance premiums. Logistics partnerships and hub-and-spoke networks are emerging but remain unevenly developed, particularly outside China, Europe, and the United States.
Volatile Cobalt & Nickel Prices Eroding Re-Seller Profit
Cobalt ranged between USD 15 and USD 35 /lb during 2024-2025, while nickel swung in response to Indonesian supply expansions and demand shifts toward LFP chemistries. The 3-6 month lag between acquiring scrap and selling recovered metals exposes unhedged recyclers to adverse moves. Lower cobalt content in LFP cells reduces value density, forcing higher tonnage throughput to maintain revenue, stressing furnaces and leach circuits. Larger companies respond with hedging, diversified product portfolios, and fee-based processing contracts; smaller recyclers lack comparable tools and remain margin-sensitive.
Segment Analysis
By Type: Lead-Acid Dominance Faces Lithium-Ion Disruption
Lead-acid batteries accounted for 61.7% of the battery scrap market share in 2024, benefiting from recycling rates above 90% and decades-old smelting infrastructure, while lithium-ion scrap recorded the fastest 22.5% CAGR and is set to challenge incumbent volumes by 2030. The battery scrap market size tied to lead remains stable because material-handling fleets and backup power installations continue to favor low-cost lead-acid solutions. However, OEM electrification strategies are expanding lithium-ion deployments, especially nickel-rich NMC and iron-phosphate chemistries that demand more intricate hydrometallurgical or direct-recycling flows.
Recyclers are investing in dual-line plants that process lead-acid through conventional pyrometallurgy and lithium-ion through mechanical-hydro combinations, capturing synergies in logistics and permitting. Automation is easing chemistry identification, with hyperspectral cameras flagging lead posts or steel casings before shredding. While nickel-cadmium and zinc-air cells remain niche, solid-state prototypes across consumer and aerospace sectors may introduce fresh material profiles that require separate flow sheets, underscoring the need for adaptive plant design.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Application: Automotive Leads While Energy Storage Accelerates
Automotive batteries supplied 53.5% of 2024 revenue and anchor feedstock availability through predictable dealer trade-ins and mandated vehicle retirement programs. The battery scrap market size sourced from vehicles remains sizable because internal-combustion cars still use 12 V lead-acid units, and EV packs are now retiring. Yet stationary energy-storage systems outpace every other end-use at a 23.8% CAGR, propelled by renewables integration and demand-response programs that deploy utility-scale containerized batteries.
Growing grid-storage demand is reshaping value propositions for recyclers, who now offer inspection, state-of-health analysis, and repurposing services before final material recovery. Second-life deployments, such as Element Energy’s 53 MWh project in Texas, extend useful life, reducing immediate scrap flows but locking recyclers into long-term service agreements. Consumer electronics and aerospace produce smaller but metal-rich streams—particularly cobalt-heavy laptop cells and high-nickel defense batteries—supporting premium toll-processing fees.
By End-User: Dedicated Facilities Lead OEM Integration
Dedicated facilities captured 46.0% of 2024 revenue, using scale and multi-chemistry expertise to meet stringent environmental, health, and safety (EHS) requirements. The battery scrap market share held by these plants is expected to fall as OEM take-back programs, forecast to grow 27.1% CAGR, integrate collection, dismantling, and material recovery into branded after-sales channels. Automakers see recycling as material insurance and a brand-differentiation lever in carbon reporting.
Utilities and power producers are emerging customers as grid batteries retire, prompting recyclers to develop mobile dismantling units that disassemble on-site to mitigate fire risk during transport. Third-party waste-management firms leverage municipal contracts but face investment needs to upgrade from manual lead-acid dismantling lines to lithium-ion processes. Informal collectors that once dominated emerging markets encounter stricter licensing rules, reducing their competitive edge.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Geography Analysis
Asia-Pacific held 48.8% of global revenue in 2024 and is projected to post a 13.5% CAGR through 2030, the highest among regions. China’s policy mix—black-mass import restrictions and mandatory producer take-back—forces local processing, enabling domestic refiners to claim roughly 70% of global lithium-ion recycling capacity. Exide Industries in India already fulfills 45% of its lead requirements from recycled feed and is allocating capital to lithium-ion recovery, showing that regional incumbents are diversifying beyond lead.(3)Exide Industries, “Annual Report 2025,” exideindustries.com
North America ranks second, supported by EV production surges and incentives such as production tax credits for critical-mineral recycling. Capacity additions by Li-Cycle, Redwood Materials, and Ascend Elements outpace near-term scrap generation, making feedstock competition intense. Canada’s mining heritage supplies hydrometallurgical expertise, while Mexico’s growing auto cluster adds future volumes, though hazardous-waste transit rules currently cause cross-border delays. The United States encourages closed-loop agreements through the Inflation Reduction Act content rules that boost demand for domestic recycled metals.
Europe’s battery scrap market growth is anchored in the Battery Regulation 2023/1542, which prescribes escalating collection quotas and minimum recycled-content thresholds for new cells, guaranteeing offtake for refiners. Germany leads investments, while Nordic recyclers capitalize on low-carbon hydropower to lower the Scope 2 footprint of recovered metals. Traceability requirements, including digital battery passports, push processors to adopt blockchain-based chain-of-custody systems that elevate market value for certified output. Eastern European states offer room for greenfield capacity but must improve permitting speed and hazardous-waste transport coordination to attract investors.
Competitive Landscape
The battery scrap industry shows moderate concentration: Umicore, Li-Cycle, and Redwood Materials collectively control an estimated 35-40% of global lithium-ion throughput, while regional specialists fill geography and chemistry niches. Market leaders differentiate through integrated collection, direct-recycling intellectual property, and 5-10-year take-off contracts with automakers. Yet most plants run below nameplate capacity because battery retirements lag production, forcing aggressive feedstock sourcing strategies, including partnerships with logistics firms and electronics recyclers.
Strategic alliances dominate M&A activity. The LG-Toyota venture aims at North American market entry without replicating legacy smelters, BASF-Stena pairs chemical know-how with an extensive collection network in Scandinavia, and Hyundai-Lithion establishes captive capacity alongside vehicle assembly. Technology investments focus on AI-enabled disassembly, solvent extraction improvements, and sulfate-to-metal conversion steps that cut reagent costs. Fire-safety incidents at several plants in the United Kingdom and the United States have pushed insurers to tighten underwriting, raising coverage costs 15-20% and encouraging operators to automate hazardous tasks.
Competitive pressure also centers on feed-advance fees. Larger players can pay suppliers within 10 days, squeezing smaller outfits that rely on post-processing revenues. Regional environmental, social, and governance disclosure rules further favor firms with audited emissions data, catalyzing a split between compliance-ready recyclers and traditional scrap traders.
Battery Scrap Industry Leaders
-
Umicore
-
Glencore
-
Li-Cycle
-
Redwood Materials
-
Guangdong Brunp Recycling
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- April 2025: LG Energy Solution has partnered with Derichebourg, a leading French metal waste recycler, to build a battery recycling plant in Bruyères-sur-Oise, France. Construction begins in 2026, with operations starting in 2027, focusing on pre-processing battery scrap and collecting end-of-life EV batteries.
- February 2025: Cylib secured EUR 55 million (USD 58.3 million) to scale hydrometallurgical lithium-ion recovery across Europe.
- January 2025: Li Industries, a pioneer in lithium-ion battery recycling technologies, has successfully raised USD 36 million in a Series B funding round to bolster its expansion efforts.
- December 2024: NEU Battery Materials raised USD 4.28 million for processes targeting solid-state and silicon-anode scrap.
Global Battery Scrap Market Report Scope
| Lead-Acid Battery Scrap |
| Lithium-ion Battery Scrap |
| Nickel-based Battery Scrap |
| Other Chemistries (NiCd, Zn-air, Solid-state pre-commercial) |
| Automotive |
| Industrial Motive-Power |
| Consumer Electronics |
| Stationary Energy-Storage Systems |
| Aerospace and Defense |
| Other Niche Uses (medical, maritime, mining) |
| Dedicated Recycling Facilities |
| Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM Take-Back) |
| Utilities and Power Producers |
| Third-party Waste-Management Firms |
| Informal/Small-scale Collectors |
| North America | United States |
| Canada | |
| Mexico | |
| Europe | Germany |
| United Kingdom | |
| France | |
| Italy | |
| NORDIC Countries | |
| Russia | |
| Rest of Europe | |
| Asia-Pacific | China |
| India | |
| Japan | |
| South Korea | |
| ASEAN Countries | |
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | |
| South America | Brazil |
| Argentina | |
| Rest of South America | |
| Middle East and Africa | Saudi Arabia |
| United Arab Emirates | |
| South Africa | |
| Egypt | |
| Rest of Middle East and Africa |
| By Type | Lead-Acid Battery Scrap | |
| Lithium-ion Battery Scrap | ||
| Nickel-based Battery Scrap | ||
| Other Chemistries (NiCd, Zn-air, Solid-state pre-commercial) | ||
| By Application | Automotive | |
| Industrial Motive-Power | ||
| Consumer Electronics | ||
| Stationary Energy-Storage Systems | ||
| Aerospace and Defense | ||
| Other Niche Uses (medical, maritime, mining) | ||
| By End-User | Dedicated Recycling Facilities | |
| Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM Take-Back) | ||
| Utilities and Power Producers | ||
| Third-party Waste-Management Firms | ||
| Informal/Small-scale Collectors | ||
| By Geography | North America | United States |
| Canada | ||
| Mexico | ||
| Europe | Germany | |
| United Kingdom | ||
| France | ||
| Italy | ||
| NORDIC Countries | ||
| Russia | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| Asia-Pacific | China | |
| India | ||
| Japan | ||
| South Korea | ||
| ASEAN Countries | ||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||
| South America | Brazil | |
| Argentina | ||
| Rest of South America | ||
| Middle East and Africa | Saudi Arabia | |
| United Arab Emirates | ||
| South Africa | ||
| Egypt | ||
| Rest of Middle East and Africa | ||
Key Questions Answered in the Report
How big is the global battery scrap segment in 2025 and what is its growth trajectory?
The sector is valued at USD 28.78 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 47.97 billion by 2030, reflecting a robust 10.76% CAGR over 2025-2030.
Which battery chemistry currently generates the largest scrap volume?
Lead-acid batteries still command 61.7% of global scrap revenue in 2024, thanks to well-established automotive and industrial collection networks.
Why does Asia-Pacific lead battery scrap recovery?
The region holds 48.8% share and posts a 13.5% CAGR because China alone processes about 70% of worldwide lithium-ion waste under strict take-back and capacity-expansion policies.
What is the main catalyst behind surging lithium-ion scrap flows?
End-of-life volumes from early electric-vehicle cohorts are rising sharply; global EV battery waste is projected to hit 11 million t annually by 2030.
Which obstacles most constrain efficient battery recycling?
High reverse-logistics costs for UN3480-classified packs, volatile cobalt and nickel pricing, and elevated fire-safety insurance premiums collectively erode recycler margins.
How are automakers securing recycled metals for new batteries?
OEM take-back programs and multi-year closed-loop offtake contracts—now growing at 27.1% CAGR—provide recyclers with steady feedstock and guarantee supply for cell production.
Page last updated on: