Wave Energy Market Size and Share
Market Overview
| Study Period | 2020 - 2030 |
|---|---|
| Market Volume (2025) | 4 megawatt |
| Market Volume (2030) | 100 megawatt |
| Growth Rate (2025 - 2030) | 90.37% CAGR |
| Fastest Growing Market | Asia Pacific |
| Largest Market | Europe |
| Market Concentration | Medium |
Major Players
*Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0. |
|
Wave Energy Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Wave Energy Market size in terms of installed base is expected to grow from 4 megawatt in 2025 to 100 megawatt by 2030, at a CAGR of 90.37% during the forecast period (2025-2030).
Breakthrough cost reductions in composite structures and modular power-take-off (PTO) systems are narrowing the levelized energy (LCOE) gap with mature renewables, transforming the wave energy market from pilot trials to commercial roll-outs. Accelerating demand for predictable, ocean-sourced baseload renewables that firm wind and solar output is strengthening developer pipelines, while coordinated European and Asia-Pacific (APAC) policy support de-risks early projects. Established offshore wind supply chains now provide fabrication, installation, and operations know-how, enabling technology crossover and quicker learning curves. Venture and infrastructure funds shift capital from single-device tests to array-scale demonstrators, signaling investor confidence in near-term commercialization prospects.
Key Report Takeaways
- By type, oscillating body converters held 58.8% of the wave energy market share in 2024; the segment is projected to expand at a 120.5% CAGR through 2030.
- By deployment location, onshore systems commanded 60.4% of the wave energy market size in 2024, while offshore shallow shelf projects record the highest projected CAGR at 115.9% through 2030.
- By application, power generation accounted for a 77.5% share of the wave energy market size in 2024, and desalination is advancing at a 110.2% CAGR through 2030.
- By geography, Europe led with 55.2% revenue share in 2024; APAC is forecast to grow at a 107.4% CAGR to 2030.
Global Wave Energy Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (%) Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feed-in-tariff & contract-for-difference schemes expand in EU & APAC | +15.2% | EU core, expanding to APAC markets | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Demand for ocean-sourced baseload renewables to balance wind/solar | +12.8% | Global, with priority in high-VRE grids | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Cost decline from composite structures & modular PTOs | +8.4% | Global technology deployment | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Rising venture & infrastructure fund investments in demonstrator arrays | +6.3% | North America & EU, spillover to APAC | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Power-to-X hubs (green hydrogen/ammonia) integrating wave devices | +4.1% | North Sea, expanding globally | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Decarbonisation mandates for offshore O&G platforms driving co-location | +2.9% | North Sea, Gulf of Mexico, Asia offshore | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Feed-in-tariff & Contract-for-difference Schemes Expand in EU & APAC
European mechanisms now pair revenue certainty with market exposure, offering a balanced incentive that minimizes subsidy dependence. The European Union’s 1 GW ocean energy goal 2030 prompted Portugal to open dedicated pilot zones and the United Kingdom to establish marine energy funds, while Turkey’s recent subsidies underscore broader uptake.(1)Source: Ocean Energy Europe, “Coordinate with Member States on Funding,” oceanenergy-europe.eu APAC governments, led by Japan, are adapting these templates to local grids, giving wave developers access to bankable offtake contracts. The policy convergence cuts regulatory risk, spurs equipment standardization, and invites cross-border investment, positioning the wave energy market for faster scale-up.
Demand for Ocean-sourced Baseload Renewables to Balance Wind/Solar
Grid operators view wave output as predictably out-of-phase with wind and solar, supplying power during calm or overcast periods and reducing fossil-based spinning reserves.(2)Source: International Energy Agency, “Maintaining a Stable Electricity Grid in the Energy Transition,” iea.org Studies on Scottish island networks show that diverse marine generation cuts system costs and volatility.(3)Source: Chris Matthew and Catalina Spataru, “Scottish Islands Interconnections,” mdpi.com Wave devices provide 12-hour forecasting accuracy, letting system operators schedule dispatch confidently. These grid services allow the technology to command premium tariffs that improve project bankability beyond straightforward energy sales.
Cost Decline from Composite Structures & Modular PTOs
Standardized composite hulls and modular PTO cartridges now cut capital expenditure by 50% versus first-generation devices, aiming for 70–85% conversion efficiencies. Direct-drive and hydraulic PTOs reduce moving parts, lowering offshore maintenance trips and downtime. Floating composite platforms also lengthen asset life in corrosive marine settings. Array-scale orders trigger volume manufacturing as costs fall, reinforcing the virtuous cost-learning loop that propelled wind and solar.
Rising Venture & Infrastructure Fund Investments in Demonstrator Arrays
Investors now regard wave arrays as infrastructure assets once power purchase agreements and grid links are secured. CorPower Ocean’s EUR 32 million raise and European Innovation Council backing reflect a shift from seed to growth financing. Facilities like PacWave in Oregon provide grid-connected test beds that standardize validation, slash due diligence costs, and accelerate technology readiness. This funding momentum compresses commercialization timelines and deepens the project pipeline.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (%) Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| High CAPEX & LCOE gap versus mature renewables | -8.7% | Global, particularly cost-sensitive markets | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Grid interconnection & multi-agency permitting hurdles | -6.2% | Regulatory-complex jurisdictions globally | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Marine-spatial conflict with future deep-sea mining zones | -3.8% | Atlantic & Pacific deep-water zones | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Shortage of specialised far-shore maintenance vessels & crew | -2.5% | Offshore deployment regions globally | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
High CAPEX & LCOE Gap Versus Mature Renewables
Despite recent cost cuts, wave LCOE of EUR 0.15–0.30 kWh is still 2–3 times offshore wind, restricting projects to sites where grid stability or water co-production earns add-on value.(4)Source: Sergej Antonello Sirigu, “Estimating the Cost of Wave Energy Converters,” mdpi.com Custom engineering for harsh sea states inflates design hours and slows standardization. Developers respond by stacking revenue streams—water, coastal protection, hydrogen—to offset the electricity price premium, but pure energy-only bids remain challenging outside subsidized markets.
Grid Interconnection & Multi-agency Permitting Hurdles
Developers navigate energy, maritime, environmental, and coastal permits, stretching timelines by up to five years compared with onshore renewables.(5)Source: U.S. Department of Energy, “PacWave Offshore Wave Energy Test Site,” energy.gov Cable routes and substation upgrades drive up-front capital, and the lack of harmonized environmental protocols forces site-specific studies that smaller firms can scarcely finance. The permitting burden could consolidate the wave energy market around utilities and oil-and-gas majors with deeper regulatory expertise.
Segment Analysis
By Type: Oscillating Body Converters Lead Technology Convergence
Oscillating body converters captured 58.8% of 2024 installations, reflecting proven efficiency across diverse wave climates, and they are set to grow at a 120.5% CAGR—far above any rival design. Their modular architecture aligns with factory manufacturing and quick offshore exchange, reducing downtime and boosting availability, which commands developer attention.(6)Source: Mewburn Ellis, “Wave Energy Converters,” mewburn.com Oscillating water columns remain favored inside breakwaters where civil infrastructure is present, offering dual coastal defense and energy output. Overtopping converters target high-energy swells, capturing peak events, but face footprint constraints near populated shorelines.
Continued R&D in direct-drive PTOs and lightweight composites anchors cost curves, making oscillating body systems the baseline technology in most request-for-proposal (RFP) documents. The wave energy market size for oscillating body devices could accelerate as utilities shift procurement toward standardized platforms. Fixed-structure alternatives still hold niche roles where site geology or permit regimes dictate, ensuring technology plurality through at least 2030.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Deployment Location: Offshore Migration Accelerates Despite Onshore Dominance
Onshore plants controlled 60.4% of 2024 volume owing to easier grid tie-ins and benign installation logistics. Yet offshore shallow shelf projects will expand at a blistering 115.9% CAGR as developers chase denser wave regimes that lift plant load factors and lifetime energy yield. Soft-chain mooring innovations cut peak line tensions, lowering hardware mass and installation cost.
Offshore migration also enables co-location with wind farms and oil platforms, lowering shared cable and service vessel overheads. Nonetheless, near-shore arrays in sub-25-meter depths will stay relevant as stepping-stones for new entrants that lack deepwater expertise. The diversified site mix helps the wave energy market hedge against single-environment risk and boosts investor confidence.
By Application: Desalination Emerges as High-growth Diversification
Power generation retained a dominant 77.5% share in 2024, but desalination projects will rise at a 110.2% CAGR as coastal water stress intensifies. Wave-powered reverse osmosis thrives on variable electricity, eliminating costly batteries and letting projects monetize kilowatt-hours and cubic meters of freshwater. Environmental protection uses, such as breakwater integration, blend coastal defense with low-carbon energy—a compelling proposition for municipal budgets.
Pilot plants in India, Australia, and Gran Canaria show capacity factors above 40%, outperforming solar-driven desalination in cloudy maritime climates. Multi-output business models diversify revenue, strengthen financing structures, and attract public infrastructure grants, widening the addressable market beyond pure utilities.
Geography Analysis
Europe commanded 55.2% of 2024 deployments, buoyed by feed-in tariffs, contract-for-difference auctions, and extensive test centers along the Atlantic rim. The United Kingdom’s marine energy fund, Portugal’s open ocean zone, and France’s Polynesian sites highlight sub-regional specialization that nurtures homegrown suppliers. Established offshore wind logistics—from jack-up vessels to subsea cable yards—compress learning curves and slash procurement costs.
Asia-Pacific is the breakout growth engine, slated for a 107.4% CAGR to 2030 as Japan, China, South Korea, and Taiwan embed wave pilots inside broader marine renewables strategies. Deep manufacturing bases for composites and power electronics promise local content advantages and export potential. Island states pursue wave-desalination hybrids to cut diesel imports, further accelerating regional uptake.
North America lags in installed capacity but hosts PacWave, the first grid-linked U.S. test site, which streamlines permitting and data collection and could ignite commercial arrays along high-energy Pacific coastlines. South America, plus the Middle East & Africa, remain nascent, hindered by limited offshore grid infrastructure, but possess strong wave climates and long coastlines that represent latent opportunity once regulatory frameworks mature.
Competitive Landscape
Technology diversity drives a fragmented field where dozens of developers compete on device physics, deployment strategy, and partnership networks. CorPower Ocean and Eco Wave Power stand out for multi-unit projects, patent depth, and government co-funding. Bombora and Mocean Energy pursue hybrid or modular solutions that dovetail with floating wind or aquaculture, seeking incremental value over single-purpose assets.
Project finance hinges on demonstration track records, pushing newcomers to align with utilities or oil-and-gas operators that bring balance-sheet capacity and offshore execution skills. As the wave energy market nears commercial traction, supply-chain consolidation around proven PTO architectures appears likely, though niche players may endure in specialized coastal or deepwater segments.
Wave Energy Industry Leaders
-
CorPower Ocean AB
-
Ocean Power Technologies
-
Eco Wave Power Ltd.
-
AW-Energy Oy
-
Bombora Wave Power Pty Ltd.
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- April 2025: Bombora completed tank testing of its floating hybrid energy platform.
- April 2025: Eco Wave Power secured the final permit for its Port of Los Angeles project.
- January 2025: U.S. Department of Energy issued its Offshore Wind Transmission Action Plan with wave energy integration pathways.
- October 2024: Eco Wave Power signed a project agreement in Taiwan.
Global Wave Energy Market Report Scope
| Oscillating Water Column |
| Oscillating Body Converters |
| Overtopping Converters |
| Onshore (fixed breakwater) |
| Near-shore (Up to 2 km, Over 25 m depth) |
| Offshore - Shallow Shelf (2 to 20 km, 25 to 60 m) |
| Offshore - Deep Water (More than 20 km, More than 60 m) |
| Power Generation |
| Desalination |
| Environmental Protection (breakwaters, reef restoration) |
| Others |
| North America | United States |
| Canada | |
| Mexico | |
| Europe | United Kingdom |
| France | |
| Spain | |
| Netherland | |
| Denmark | |
| Russia | |
| Rest of Europe | |
| Asia-Pacific | China |
| India | |
| Japan | |
| South Korea | |
| ASEAN Countries | |
| Australia and New Zealand | |
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | |
| South America | Brazil |
| Argentina | |
| Colombia | |
| Rest of South America | |
| Middle East and Africa | United Arab Emirates |
| Saudi Arabia | |
| South Africa | |
| Egypt | |
| Rest of Middle East and Africa |
| By Type | Oscillating Water Column | |
| Oscillating Body Converters | ||
| Overtopping Converters | ||
| By Deployment Location | Onshore (fixed breakwater) | |
| Near-shore (Up to 2 km, Over 25 m depth) | ||
| Offshore - Shallow Shelf (2 to 20 km, 25 to 60 m) | ||
| Offshore - Deep Water (More than 20 km, More than 60 m) | ||
| By Application | Power Generation | |
| Desalination | ||
| Environmental Protection (breakwaters, reef restoration) | ||
| Others | ||
| By Geography | North America | United States |
| Canada | ||
| Mexico | ||
| Europe | United Kingdom | |
| France | ||
| Spain | ||
| Netherland | ||
| Denmark | ||
| Russia | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| Asia-Pacific | China | |
| India | ||
| Japan | ||
| South Korea | ||
| ASEAN Countries | ||
| Australia and New Zealand | ||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||
| South America | Brazil | |
| Argentina | ||
| Colombia | ||
| Rest of South America | ||
| Middle East and Africa | United Arab Emirates | |
| Saudi Arabia | ||
| South Africa | ||
| Egypt | ||
| Rest of Middle East and Africa | ||
Key Questions Answered in the Report
How fast is global installed capacity expected to grow?
The wave energy market is projected to expand from 4 MW in 2025 to 100 MW by 2030, equating to a 90.37% CAGR.
Which region currently leads in deployed capacity?
Europe holds 55.2% of 2024 installations, supported by long-standing feed-in tariffs and contract-for-difference auctions.
What technology type dominates deployments?
Oscillating body converters account for 58.8% of current installations and are also the fastest-growing technology segment.
Why are desalination projects gaining traction?
Wave-powered desalination offers combined electricity and freshwater production, driving a 110.2% CAGR in this application through 2030.
How fragmented is the competitive landscape?
Dozens of developers pursue different designs, resulting in a low market concentration score of 2, with no single player exceeding 5% share.
What is the main cost challenge?
Wave LCOE remains 2–3 times offshore wind due to higher capital intensity and limited manufacturing scale, constraining purely energy-price-driven projects.
Page last updated on:
