Vaginal Slings Market Size and Share

Vaginal Slings Market Summary
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Vaginal Slings Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Vaginal Slings Market size is estimated at USD 1.59 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 2.31 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 7.79% during the forecast period (2025-2030).

The upward trajectory reflects high acceptance of minimally-invasive mid-urethral sling techniques, strong clinical evidence of long-term efficacy and reduced complication rates, and steady growth in the addressable patient pool as global populations age. Product design improvements especially lighter meshes made of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) further strengthen surgeon confidence by lowering erosion and pain risks relative to older polypropylene implants. Demand is boosted by favorable reimbursement in North America and the European Union; new Medicare procedure codes and clearer device labeling guidelines speed provider adoption while protecting patients. Asia-Pacific registers the fastest procedural growth because of expanding ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), growth in medical tourism, and public health campaigns that heighten awareness of pelvic floor disorders. Competitive intensity remains moderate as leading suppliers consolidate adjacent technologies, exemplified by Boston Scientific's USD 3.7 billion acquisition of Axonics in 2024 to broaden its urology franchise.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By product type, transobturator slings led with 39.82% of the vaginal slings market share in 2024; mini / single-incision systems post the fastest 11.76% CAGR to 2030. 
  • By material, polypropylene maintained 52.36% share of the vaginal slings market size in 2024, while PVDF meshes are set to grow at a 12.99% CAGR through 2030. 
  • By incontinence type, stress urinary incontinence accounted for 72.54% share of the vaginal slings market size in 2024 and is expanding at an 8.51% CAGR. 
  • By end user, hospitals commanded 57.83% of revenue in 2024; specialty clinics register the quickest 9.74% CAGR to 2030. 
  • By geography, North America captured 38.11% revenue in 2024, whereas Asia-Pacific is projected to climb at an 11.13% CAGR through 2030. 

Segment Analysis

By Product Type: Single-Incision Innovation Drives Growth

Transobturator systems delivered 39.82% revenue in 2024, cementing their role as the most implanted solution within the vaginal slings market. Clinical familiarity, low bladder perforation rates, and robust long-term data ensure steady procedural volumes in both hospital and ASC settings. Surgeons favor these devices for reproducible outcomes across varied anatomies, sustaining their hold on the vaginal slings market. Mini / single-incision slings, although newer, expand at an 11.76% CAGR as users gravitate toward faster placement and reduced dissection planes. Studies show Solyx achieving 100% objective cure at 3 months versus 91.1% for MiniArc, yet both platforms offer high subjective satisfaction. As ergonomic delivery tools emerge, single-incision systems gain broader acceptance in low-resource settings that value minimal OR time.

Objective performance also elevates tension-free vaginal tape methods, whose 71-97% 10-year subjective cure rates maintain surgeon loyalty. Meanwhile, adjustable autologous slings appeal to patients avoiding synthetics; modified laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with polyester sutures offers mesh-free durability at lower material cost. Personalized continence therapy trials underscore clinical appetite for patient-specific adjustability, suggesting gradual diversification of the product mix.

Market Share by Product Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Material Type: PVDF Emergence Reshapes Preferences

Polypropylene held 52.36% share of the vaginal slings market size in 2024 due to decades of surgeon experience and lower unit price. However, PVDF meshes lead growth with a 12.99% CAGR as superior biocompatibility and stability win clinical endorsements. Bench testing confirms larger elastic recovery and lower creep deformation than polypropylene, translating to lower erosion in vivo. Six-country registry data show fewer chronic pain complaints in PVDF recipients, accelerating conversion in Europe and North America. Absorbable and bioresorbable scaffolds carve a niche where permanent implants are culturally sensitive; poly-4-hydroxybutyrate constructs gradually resorb after 18 months while sustaining pelvic floor support, although high production costs limit immediate scale.

Material innovation attracts venture funding for 3D-printed lattice meshes tailored to individual anatomy, hinting at mass customization over the forecast horizon. As litigation risk remains tied to polymer degradation, suppliers that transition portfolios toward PVDF and bioresorbable will capture premium segments of the vaginal slings market.

By Incontinence Type: Stress Dominance with Mixed Growth

Stress urinary incontinence generated 72.54% of 2024 revenues and continues to post the fastest 8.51% CAGR. The rise in metabolic syndrome fuels incidence: lipid accumulation elevates stress incontinence odds by 63% in post-menopausal women. Early screening of cardiometabolic indices thus enlarges candidacy for surgical repair. Environmental exposure to cadmium, lead, and mercury further correlates with symptom onset, especially in younger cohorts, adding urgency to address risk factors. Clinical trials comparing mid-urethral slings with onabotulinumtoxinA injections in mixed incontinence aim to define sequencing that balances urgency and stress components. Biomarker work such as red-blood-cell-distribution-width-to-albumin ratio supports refined subtype diagnosis to guide sling selection. Dietary research indicates processed foods exacerbate leakage, while fruit-rich diets appear protective, suggesting lifestyle management alongside surgery.

Mixed and urge incontinence segments grow steadily through guideline updates that integrate combination therapies, yet stress remains the bellwether category keeping the vaginal slings market on a solid expansion path.

Market Share by Incontinence Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By End User: Specialty Clinics Lead Growth

Hospitals accounted for 57.83% revenue in 2024, leveraging 24 / 7 imaging, anesthesiology, and critical-care capacity for complex cases. Their multidisciplinary teams manage comorbid elderly patients, anchoring volume leadership inside the vaginal slings market. Yet specialty clinics post a 9.74% CAGR as focused expertise, shorter wait times, and bundled care models resonate with payers and patients. 

The ambulatory surgery network processed 3.4 million Medicare beneficiaries through 6,308 ASCs in 2023, driving USD 6.8 billion in spend and proving their economic significance. Urology-centered ASCs now host more than 60% of procedures once restricted to inpatient wards, while office-based sling placement under local anesthesia emerges for select low-BMI candidates with low operative risk. Accreditation drives protocol standardization and outcome tracking, enhancing patient confidence in these settings. As reimbursement increasingly rewards site-of-service savings, specialty clinics will intensify competition for hospital volume.

Geography Analysis

North America retained 38.11% revenue leadership in 2024, propelled by stable Medicare coverage, procedural familiarity, and a mature ASC infrastructure. The announcement of new pelvic-floor HCPCS codes in 2024 will extend reimbursement to adjunct devices, incentivizing broader care pathways. The vaginal slings market also benefits from FDA guidance that clarifies mesh labeling and affirms mini-sling safety, enabling providers to reassure patients despite legal headwinds. Nonetheless, multi-state litigation and the USD 302 million Ethicon penalty continue to temper growth in certain jurisdictions.

Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region with an 11.13% CAGR through 2030. Governments expand insurance coverage while private providers develop pelvic health centers that attract inbound medical tourism. Chinese studies reveal sizeable underdiagnosis across provinces, catalyzing public campaigns and specialist training. Japan and Australia adopt PVDF and single-incision technologies early, whereas India’s burgeoning middle class fuels volume growth in polypropylene solutions owing to cost sensitivity. Diverse regulatory landscapes require localized clinical evidence, but rising surgical capacity and ASC adoption uplift the regional vaginal slings market.

Europe maintains steady growth under the 2017/745 Medical Device Regulation that mandates rigorous clinical evaluation and post-market scrutiny, enhancing trust and driving gradual product upgrades. German clinicians, having navigated evolving mesh rules, share practice patterns that reduce complications and litigation risk. The United Kingdom’s group settlement reinforces calls for safer materials yet may encourage payers to fund premium PVDF devices to mitigate future claims. Markets in the Middle East & Africa and South America progress from a small base, aided by lower-cost laparoscopic options, local-anesthesia protocols, and growing medical tourism corridors that funnel cross-border demand.

Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

The vaginal slings market displays moderate concentration. Boston Scientific, Coloplast, and Johnson & Johnson control the largest installed bases through comprehensive sling families, surgical delivery tools, and professional education programs. Boston Scientific’s 2024 Axonics acquisition adds sacral neuromodulation, creating a full-continuum incontinence portfolio and signaling broader convergence across urology devices. Coloplast advances fixation-system ergonomics, recently securing FDA clearance for its Saffron device that simplifies suture anchoring. Ethicon reinforces physician outreach after litigation setbacks, investing in PVDF research to restore brand equity.

Material innovation is the primary differentiation vector. Companies that commercialize PVDF and bioresorbable meshes gain premium pricing and regulatory goodwill, while laggards risk share erosion as surgeons migrate away from polypropylene. Artificial-intelligence platforms for patient selection, outcome prediction, and surgical planning emerge as new battlegrounds; start-ups position algorithmic decision support to established OEMs seeking competitive edge.

Strategic acquisitions continue as firms seek broader therapy ecosystems. Beyond Axonics, med-tech players explore partnerships with digital pelvic-floor-training vendors to offer hybrid conservative-surgical packages. Geographic expansion also shapes rivalry: tier-one suppliers deepen localization in China and India through CME programs and domestic manufacturing, whereas niche innovators license IP to regional distributors rather than build global salesforces. Collectively these strategies maintain a balanced yet dynamic competitive environment for the vaginal slings market.

Vaginal Slings Industry Leaders

  1. Boston Scientific Corporation

  2. Coloplast Corp

  3. Promedon Group

  4. A.M.I. GmbH

  5. Johnson & Johnson

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Vaginal Slings Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Recent Industry Developments

  • January 2025: Boston Scientific completed its USD 3.7 billion acquisition of Axonics, Inc., significantly expanding its urology portfolio with sacral neuromodulation technologies for treating overactive bladder and incontinence conditions. The acquisition brings FDA-approved R20 and F15 systems that have treated approximately 100,000 patients globally, positioning Boston Scientific to leverage its commercial expertise for global expansion of these complementary technologies.
  • September 2024: ConTIPI Medical has announced a strategic partnership with EVERSANA to support the U.S. commercial rollout of ProVate, a disposable vaginal ring pessary developed for the non-surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Following positive outcomes from a prospective, multicenter home-use study evaluating its safety and efficacy, ProVate has received FDA 510(k) clearance and holds CE Mark approval for commercialization in Europe. The product is expected to become available to U.S. patients, offering a convenient, self-administered option for women seeking non-invasive POP treatment.
  • July 2024: The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute awarded USD 9.3 million to University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center for a comprehensive study comparing bulking agents versus sling procedures for treating stress urinary incontinence during vaginal prolapse repair. The research, expected to conclude in April 2031, will provide critical comparative effectiveness data to guide treatment decisions.

Table of Contents for Vaginal Slings Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Growing Prevalence of Stress Urinary Incontinence
    • 4.2.2 Increasing Adoption of Minimally Invasive Mid-Urethral Sling (MUS) Procedures
    • 4.2.3 Supportive Reimbursement Frameworks in Key Healthcare Markets
    • 4.2.4 Ongoing Innovations in Lightweight Meshes and Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) Materials
    • 4.2.5 Integration of AI Tools for Optimized Patient Selection
    • 4.2.6 Rising Medical Tourism in Developing Countries
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Ongoing Legal Scrutiny Over Mesh Implants
    • 4.3.2 Cultural and Social Barriers Contributing to Delayed Diagnosis
    • 4.3.3 Growing Preference for Non-Surgical Options Such as Bulking Agents and Energy-Based Therapies
    • 4.3.4 Environmental and Supply Chain Constraints Impacting Availability of Polypropylene Materials
  • 4.4 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.4.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.4.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.4.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.4.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value in USD)

  • 5.1 By Product Type
    • 5.1.1 Transobturator Slings (TOT)
    • 5.1.2 Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT)
    • 5.1.3 Mini / Single-Incision Slings
    • 5.1.4 Adjustable Autologous / Biological Slings
  • 5.2 By Material Type
    • 5.2.1 Polypropylene Mesh
    • 5.2.2 PVDF Mesh
    • 5.2.3 Absorbable / Biological Mesh
  • 5.3 By Incontinence Type
    • 5.3.1 Stress Urinary Incontinence
    • 5.3.2 Mixed Urinary Incontinence
  • 5.4 By End User
    • 5.4.1 Hospitals
    • 5.4.2 Ambulatory Surgery Centres
    • 5.4.3 Speciality Clinics
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 Germany
    • 5.5.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.3 France
    • 5.5.2.4 Italy
    • 5.5.2.5 Spain
    • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 Japan
    • 5.5.3.3 India
    • 5.5.3.4 Australia
    • 5.5.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 Middle East & Africa
    • 5.5.4.1 GCC
    • 5.5.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • 5.5.5 South America
    • 5.5.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Coloplast A/S
    • 6.3.2 Boston Scientific Corporation
    • 6.3.3 Johnson & Johnson (Ethicon)
    • 6.3.4 BD – C.R. Bard
    • 6.3.5 A.M.I. GmbH
    • 6.3.6 Caldera Medical
    • 6.3.7 Promedon Group
    • 6.3.8 Betatech Medical
    • 6.3.9 Cook Medical
    • 6.3.10 NeoMedic International
    • 6.3.11 Dynamesh
    • 6.3.12 TFS Surgical
    • 6.3.13 B. Braun Melsungen
    • 6.3.14 pfm medical
    • 6.3.15 LiNA Medical
    • 6.3.16 UroCure
    • 6.3.17 Herniamesh Srl
    • 6.3.18 Teleflex (NeoTract)
    • 6.3.19 Securisyn Medical
    • 6.3.20 Medtronic

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the global vaginal slings market as the total invoiced value of sterile, factory-built surgical kits, encompassing retropubic, transobturator, single-incision, and adjustable mid-urethral sling systems used to treat female stress or mixed urinary incontinence across hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers, and specialty clinics.

Scope exclusion: Products intended only for male incontinence, injectable bulking agents, and mesh kits for pelvic-organ prolapse remain outside this valuation.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Product Type
    • Transobturator Slings (TOT)
    • Tension-free Vaginal Tape (TVT)
    • Mini / Single-Incision Slings
    • Adjustable Autologous / Biological Slings
  • By Material Type
    • Polypropylene Mesh
    • PVDF Mesh
    • Absorbable / Biological Mesh
  • By Incontinence Type
    • Stress Urinary Incontinence
    • Mixed Urinary Incontinence
  • By End User
    • Hospitals
    • Ambulatory Surgery Centres
    • Speciality Clinics
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • Australia
      • South Korea
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East & Africa
      • GCC
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Telephone interviews and online surveys with uro-gyne surgeons, purchasing heads, and continence nurses in North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific clarified kit prices, day-case conversion rates, and mini-sling uptake, enabling us to reconcile secondary estimates and adjust regional weights.

Desk Research

We begin by combining open data from the World Health Organization, U.S. FDA MAUDE injury files, Eurostat diagnosis-related groups, and professional bodies such as the American Urogynecologic Society with financial disclosures and news captured through D&B Hoovers and Dow Jones Factiva. Procedure counts, tariff schedules, and device recall trends deliver the foundational picture, while company 10-Ks and patent abstracts illustrate competitive activity. The sources named are illustrative; many additional references informed the desk review.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down model multiplies 2024 sling procedure volumes, drawn from hospital discharge data and prevalence-to-treatment ratios, by average selling prices verified during primary calls and then cross-checks totals through selective supplier roll-ups and tender audits. Key variables like female population aged 65 plus, diagnosed stress incontinence prevalence, surgery acceptance share, and kit ASP progression feed a multivariate regression that projects demand to 2030. Country gaps are bridged by applying regional surgical penetration benchmarks that account for insurance coverage and facility density.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs pass three layers of analyst review that test variance against independent revenue series and currency conversions. Reports refresh each year, and whenever major recalls or reimbursement changes arise, we trigger an interim update. Only after those checks converge do we release the market baseline to clients.

Why Mordor's Vaginal Slings Baseline Commands Confidence

Published numbers often differ because publishers mix product scopes, apply static prices, or refresh data at irregular intervals.

Variations usually hinge on whether single-incision kits are included, the method used for ASP erosion, and how quickly new regulatory filings enter the model.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 1.59 B (2025) Mordor Intelligence
USD 1.80 B (2024) Global Consultancy A Excludes ambulatory center volumes and uses flat ASP
USD 1.90 B (2023) Industry Journal B Extends historic CAGR without fresh primary validation
USD 1.60 B (2025) Regional Consultancy C Omits single-incision kits and relies on older tariff data

The comparison shows that by rooting estimates in live procedure counts, tested price points, and an annual refresh cadence, Mordor Intelligence delivers a balanced, transparent baseline that decision-makers can trace and replicate with confidence.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the vaginal slings market?

The vaginal slings market was valued at USD 1.59 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 2.31 billion by 2030 at a 7.79% CAGR.

Which product type holds the largest share in the vaginal slings market?

Transobturator slings led with 39.82% revenue in 2024, benefitting from long-standing clinical familiarity and favorable safety data.

Why are PVDF meshes gaining popularity over polypropylene?

PVDF offers higher tensile strength, lower bending stiffness, and superior in-vivo stability, which together reduce erosion and pain complications that have affected polypropylene implants.

Which region will grow the fastest through 2030?

Asia-Pacific is forecast to expand at an 11.13% CAGR, driven by rising procedure volumes in China, India, Japan, and Australia alongside robust medical tourism.

How are legal actions influencing market growth?

Large settlements and stricter regulatory classifications slow near-term adoption in North America and Europe, prompting manufacturers to develop safer materials and more rigorous clinical evidence.

What role do ambulatory surgery centers play in market expansion?

ASCs handle more than 60% of urology procedures in the United States, offering cost advantages and patient convenience that support wider access to sling surgeries.

Page last updated on:

Vaginal Slings Report Snapshots