North America Hemodynamic Monitoring Market Size and Share

North America Hemodynamic Monitoring Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
View Global Report

North America Hemodynamic Monitoring Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The North America hemodynamic monitoring market size stood at USD 709.26 million in 2025 and is projected to soften to USD 870.11 million by 2030 while still expanding at a 4.17% CAGR during the period. This trajectory reflects hospital consolidation, reimbursement tied to quality, and the rapid integration of AI-enabled analytics that transform pressure or flow values into actionable predictions. Vendor platforms now bundle hardware, software, disposables, and cloud subscriptions, giving health systems a predictable total cost of ownership. A swift pivot toward minimally invasive or wearable sensors reduces infection risk and broadens usage beyond the intensive-care unit, while Medicare’s remote-monitoring codes help preserve capital spending even as operating budgets tighten.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By product type, Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems captured 56.65% of the North America hemodynamic monitoring market share in 2024; meanwhile, Hemodynamic Monitoring Sensors are forecast to post a 5.12% CAGR through 2030.
  • By monitoring type, Cardiac Output accounted for 39.54% of the North America hemodynamic monitoring market size in 2024, whereas Oxygen Saturation Monitoring is projected to grow at a 5.56% CAGR to 2030.
  • By end user, hospitals held 56.01% of revenue in 2024, while home-care settings are advancing at a 5.96% CAGR through 2030.
  • By geography, the United States represented 85.16% of 2024 revenue and is expanding at a 5.25% CAGR through 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Product Type: Systems Lead While Sensors Drive Innovation

Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems secured 56.65% of the North America hemodynamic monitoring market in 2024, underscoring buyers’ preference for end-to-end ecosystems calibrated for ICU workflows. Although unit growth is modest, steady disposable pull-through keeps vendors’ service revenue intact. The North America hemodynamic monitoring market size for systems should slip from USD 402.2 million in 2025 to USD 380.4 million by 2030 as hospitals stretch replacement cycles; however, AI software upgrades and cybersecurity modules will buoy margins.  

Sensors, rising at a 5.12% CAGR, represent the innovation vanguard. Miniaturized optical or impedance sensors integrate directly with telemetry patches, opening chronic-care and ambulatory channels. Terumo’s CDI OneView, which displays 22 parameters in the OR, illustrates convergence of high acuity and multi-metric analytics. As algorithms perfect signal quality under motion or low perfusion, sensor makers are primed to lift their slice of the North America hemodynamic monitoring market share.

North America Hemodynamic Monitoring Market: Market Share by Product Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Monitoring Type: Cardiac Output Dominance Challenged by Emerging Applications

Cardiac Output remains the backbone at 39.54% share thanks to clinician familiarity and robust procedural coding. Non-invasive pulse-contour and bioreactance platforms offset declining catheter use, sustaining spending across ICUs and cath labs. Oxygen Saturation Monitoring, however, shows a 5.56% CAGR as multi-wavelength probes extend utility to tissue oximetry and venous saturation. Masimo’s rainbow SET drove healthcare revenue to USD 372 million in Q1 2025, validating appetite for broadened non-invasive diagnostics. Pressure and volume indices persist as clinical staples, but the real differentiation lies in composite scores that synthesize multiple parameters into single actionable numbers, reducing cognitive load amid nurse shortages.

By End User: Hospital Dominance Faces Home-Care Disruption

Hospitals held 56.01% of 2024 revenue because regulations still mandate continuous observation for high-acuity cases. Nevertheless, the North America hemodynamic monitoring market size attributed to home-care will jump from USD 78.5 million in 2025 to USD 104.1 million by 2030. Remote monitoring keeps fragile heart-failure patients out of hospital beds and aligns with CMS readmission penalties. Cath labs and ambulatory surgical centers pick up volume as same-day structural-heart procedures grow, demanding compact consoles that interface seamlessly with anesthesia records.  

North America Hemodynamic Monitoring Market: Market Share by End User
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Monitoring Type: Technology Integration Drives Clinical Adoption

Platform evolution now extends beyond cardiovascular metrics into cerebral autoregulation, tissue perfusion, and heart–lung interactions. BD’s HemoSphere Alta overlays cerebral blood-flow analytics onto standard pressure monitoring, offering a holistic view of perfusion. FDA guidance for predictive cardiovascular indicators fast-tracks such feature sets, and hospitals gravitate toward consoles that collapse multiple data streams into a latency-free interface. Vendors that master interoperability will control upgrade cycles and expand subscription revenue in the North America hemodynamic monitoring market.

Geography Analysis

The United States commands 85.16% of regional revenue and posts a 5.25% CAGR to 2030. Bundled-payment incentives, robust clinical research infrastructure, and supplier mergers—chiefly BD’s USD 4.2 billion purchase of Edwards Lifesciences’ Critical Care line—cement U.S. pre-eminence. High adoption in academic centers sets interoperability norms for the entire North America hemodynamic monitoring market.  

Canada, while smaller, benefits from Health Canada’s alignment with FDA classifications that shorten certification timelines. Provincial systems require rigorous cost-effectiveness proofs, steering suppliers toward outcome contracts rather than device sales. The Action Plan on Medical Devices enhances post-market vigilance, bolstering clinician confidence and easing diffusion across Ontario and British Columbia.  

Mexico’s value lies in manufacturing scale and cost-efficient assembly for consumables and wearable patches. Yet capital deployment in public hospitals trails that of the United States and Canada. As supply-chain localization gains currency, maquiladora exports should trim component costs region-wide, alleviating part of the cost restraint that drags on the North America hemodynamic monitoring market CAGR.

Competitive Landscape

The North America hemodynamic monitoring market exhibits moderate concentration: BD, Baxter, Edwards Lifesciences, ICU Medical, and Terumo together control about 62% of revenue. BD’s acquisition of Edwards’ Critical Care assets fuses 10,000 global installations with its smart-connected-care portfolio[2]Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “CY 2026 Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule,” federalregister.gov, sharpening cross-selling leverage. Baxter uses its IV-pump franchise to seed adoption of fluid-optimization modules whereas ICU Medical links closed-loop infusion with real-time pressure trending. Terumo leans on cardiac-surgery dominance to launch multi-parameter monitors that expand operating-room safety.  

Disruptors such as Cardiosense, Endotronix, and Vectorious center on implantable or patch-based sensors that stream cloud analytics, targeting pay-for-performance contracts with insurers. Partnerships also redraw the map: Medtronic and Philips now co-market integrated monitoring suites combining Nellcor oximetry and Microstream capnography, streamlining procurement for IDNs. Market share battles increasingly hinge on interoperability credentials and the ability to guarantee outcome improvements—terms that favor companies with deep data-science benches and balance sheets.

North America Hemodynamic Monitoring Industry Leaders

  1. Getinge AB

  2. Becton, Dickinson and Company (Edwards Lifesciences Corporation)

  3. GE Healthcare

  4. Baxter International Inc.

  5. Koninklijke Philips N.V.

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
North America Hemodynamic Monitoring Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Recent Industry Developments

  • July 2025: Cardiosense obtained FDA 510(k) clearance for the wearable CardioTag
  • April 2025: BD debuted HemoSphere Alta, the first platform to merge cerebral autoregulation analytics with blood-pressure prediction

Table of Contents for North America Hemodynamic Monitoring Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Increasing adoption of minimally-invasive monitoring platforms
    • 4.2.2 Growing prevalence of heart-failure & critical-care admissions
    • 4.2.3 Expansion of ambulatory / home hemodynamic programmes
    • 4.2.4 Favourable US reimbursement via bundled-payment incentives
    • 4.2.5 AI-driven clinical decision-support in ICUs
    • 4.2.6 Hospital shift toward outcome-based purchasing models
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Shortage of critical-care nurses trained on advanced monitors
    • 4.3.2 High device & disposable costs for smaller hospitals
    • 4.3.3 Measurement-accuracy issues in obese / arrhythmic patients
    • 4.3.4 Data-interoperability gaps across multi-vendor equipment
  • 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter’s Five Forces
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value)

  • 5.1 By Product Type
    • 5.1.1 Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems
    • 5.1.1.1 Invasive Systems
    • 5.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Systems
    • 5.1.1.3 Non-Invasive Systems
    • 5.1.2 Hemodynamic Monitoring Catheters
    • 5.1.3 Hemodynamic Monitoring Sensors
    • 5.1.4 Disposables & Accessories
  • 5.2 By Monitoring Type
    • 5.2.1 Cardiac Output Monitoring
    • 5.2.2 Pressure Monitoring
    • 5.2.3 Volume Monitoring
    • 5.2.4 Oxygen Saturation Monitoring
    • 5.2.5 Others
  • 5.3 By End User
    • 5.3.1 Hospitals
    • 5.3.2 Cath Labs & Interventional Centers
    • 5.3.3 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    • 5.3.4 Home-Care Settings
    • 5.3.5 Other End Users
  • 5.4 By North America
    • 5.4.1 United States
    • 5.4.2 Canada
    • 5.4.3 Mexico

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products & Services, Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
    • 6.3.2 Baxter International Inc.
    • 6.3.3 ICU Medical Inc.
    • 6.3.4 GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
    • 6.3.5 Koninklijke Philips N.V.
    • 6.3.6 Getinge AB
    • 6.3.7 Nihon Kohden Corp.
    • 6.3.8 Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co. Ltd.
    • 6.3.9 Terumo Corp.
    • 6.3.10 Medtronic plc
    • 6.3.11 Masimo Corp.
    • 6.3.12 Osypka Medical GmbH
    • 6.3.13 CNSystems Medizintechnik GmbH
    • 6.3.14 Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaA
    • 6.3.15 Deltex Medical Group plc
    • 6.3.16 Tensys Medical Inc.
    • 6.3.17 Merit Medical Systems Inc.
    • 6.3.18 Becton, Dickinson and Company
    • 6.3.19 Retia Medical LLC

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment

North America Hemodynamic Monitoring Market Report Scope

As per the scope of the report, critically ill patients require continuous monitoring of their vital parameters. This is done by direct pressure monitoring systems, which are also known as hemodynamic systems. The main function of these systems is to monitor cardiac activity. The hemodynamic systems give information about blood pressure, blood volume, and fluid balance. The North America Hemodynamic Monitoring Market is Segmented by System (Minimally Invasive Monitoring Systems, Invasive Monitoring Systems, and Non-invasive Monitoring Systems), Application (Laboratory-based Monitoring Systems, Home-based Monitoring Systems, Hospital-based Monitoring Systems), and Geography (United States, Canada, and Mexico). The report offers the value (USD million) for the above segments.

By Product Type
Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems Invasive Systems
Minimally Invasive Systems
Non-Invasive Systems
Hemodynamic Monitoring Catheters
Hemodynamic Monitoring Sensors
Disposables & Accessories
By Monitoring Type
Cardiac Output Monitoring
Pressure Monitoring
Volume Monitoring
Oxygen Saturation Monitoring
Others
By End User
Hospitals
Cath Labs & Interventional Centers
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Home-Care Settings
Other End Users
By North America
United States
Canada
Mexico
By Product Type Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems Invasive Systems
Minimally Invasive Systems
Non-Invasive Systems
Hemodynamic Monitoring Catheters
Hemodynamic Monitoring Sensors
Disposables & Accessories
By Monitoring Type Cardiac Output Monitoring
Pressure Monitoring
Volume Monitoring
Oxygen Saturation Monitoring
Others
By End User Hospitals
Cath Labs & Interventional Centers
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Home-Care Settings
Other End Users
By North America United States
Canada
Mexico

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current value of the North America hemodynamic monitoring market?

The market is valued at USD 709.26 million in 2025.

Which product category is growing fastest?

Hemodynamic Monitoring Sensors are rising at a 5.12% CAGR through 2030.

Which monitoring type shows the highest growth rate?

Oxygen Saturation Monitoring leads with a 5.56% CAGR forecast to 2030.

Why are home-care settings gaining traction?

Remote patient monitoring reimbursement and patient preference support a 5.96% CAGR for home-care deployments.

Which country dominates regional revenue?

The United States controls 85.16% of 2024 sales and is advancing at a 5.25% CAGR.

How are hospitals justifying new monitor purchases?

Bundled-payment incentives and device-as-a-service models shorten payback periods and shift spending from capex to opex.

Page last updated on:

North America Hemodynamic Monitoring Report Snapshots