Hemodynamic Monitoring Market Size & Share Analysis - Growth Trends & Forecasts

The Hemodynamic Monitoring Systems Market Report Segments the Industry Into System Type (Minimally Invasive Monitoring Systems, and More), Device (Pulmonary Artery Catheters, Pulse Contour Analysis Devices, and More), End User (Hospitals and Clinics, and More), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa, and South America). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Hemodynamic Monitoring Market Size and Share

Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Compare market size and growth of Global Hemodynamic Monitoring Market with other markets in Healthcare Industry

Global Hemodynamic Monitoring Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Global Hemodynamic Monitoring Market size is estimated at USD 1.19 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 1.45 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 4.07% during the forecast period (2025-2030).

Growth remains steady rather than rapid because providers prioritize cost control and outcome gains, steering investments toward non-invasive platforms and AI-powered analytics that cut complications and staff workload. Aging populations in North America, Europe, Japan, and increasingly China lift the clinical demand curve for continuous cardiovascular surveillance, while hospital-at-home models open fresh demand pockets for remote monitoring hardware and software. Manufacturers respond by integrating goal-directed therapy algorithms, sepsis early-warning scores, and predictive blood-pressure indices into unified dashboards that shorten ICU stays. Competitive dynamics intensified after BD bought Edwards Lifesciences’ Critical Care unit. This deal immediately gave the buyer the largest installed base of intelligent monitors and set an acquisition premium for end-to-end platforms.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By system type, minimally invasive technologies held 42.11% of the hemodynamic monitoring market share in 2024, while non-invasive systems are forecast to grow at a 5.01% CAGR to 2030. 
  • By device, pulmonary artery catheters led with 29.54% of the hemodynamic monitoring market size in 2024; wearable doppler ultrasound patches are poised to expand at a 7.65% CAGR through 2030. 
  • By end user, hospitals and clinics commanded 51.92% of the hemodynamic monitoring market size in 2024; home-care and remote monitoring settings show the fastest growth at a 4.75% CAGR. 
  • By geography, North America controlled 40.20% revenue share in 2024, whereas Asia-Pacific is projected to register the highest regional CAGR of 6.13% to 2030. 

Segment Analysis

By System Type: Non-Invasive Technologies Drive Innovation

Minimally invasive platforms captured 42.11% of the hemodynamic monitoring market share in 2024, reflecting decades of clinician familiarity and detailed waveform analytics. Yet non-invasive systems top the growth league at a 5.01% CAGR, propelled by miniaturized sensors that match catheter precision and by payer pressure to limit infection-related extensions of stay. Across ICUs and step-down units, staff now rotate between cuffless blood-pressure cuffs for stable cases and arterial-waveform modules for acute decompensation within unified workstations. Hospitals cite reduced line-care costs and faster mobilization to justify capital spending. 

Demand momentum signals a structural pivot: vendors bundle impedance cardiography, Doppler ultrasound, and photoplethysmography channels into one dockable chassis, meeting multiple acuity tiers with a single fleet. Software upgrades introduce deep-learning stroke-volume variation calculations that alert staff long before hypotension manifests, embedding clinical decision support at the bedside. As a result, the hemodynamic monitoring market size for non-invasive modalities is projected to add USD 160 million new revenue between 2025 and 2030, narrowing the gap with legacy invasive systems.

Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Device: Wearable Technologies Disrupt Traditional Monitoring

Pulmonary artery catheters still underpin 29.54% of 2024 revenue due to unmatched mixed-venous oxygen saturation trending in complex cardiac cases. Nevertheless, wearable Doppler ultrasound patches book the swiftest ascent at a 7.65% CAGR, buoyed by favorable human-factors scores and infection-risk elimination. Early adopters document nursing-time savings of 20 minutes per patient per shift when ultrasound patches replace manual cuff cycles. 

AI further tilts the field. Edwards’ Acumen Hypotension Prediction Index trims intra-operative hypotension by 57% and ships pre-installed on multiple hardware lines, protecting catheter share while preparing a runway for wearable hybrids. Parallel innovation in volume-clamp rings and bioreactance vests foretell multimodal wearables that stream flow, pressure, and biochemical markers to cloud dashboards. Correspondingly, the hemodynamic monitoring market size for wearables is forecast to climb at twice the pace of any catheter segment, underscoring the shift toward untethered continuous care.

By End User: Remote Monitoring Reshapes Care Delivery

Hospitals and clinics retained 51.92% of 2024 revenue because acute shock and major surgery still require in-house invasive tools. Yet the remote-monitoring category posts a 4.75% CAGR on the back of Medicare billing codes that reimburse up to USD 48 per 30-day cycle for home physiologic monitoring. Health systems pilot hospital-at-home programs where congestive-heart-failure patients receive wireless Doppler patches and tablet dashboards, cutting readmissions by 15%. 

Ambulatory surgery centers and cath labs also broaden procurement as day-surgery volumes climb, demanding lightweight monitors that roll between procedure rooms. Vendors differentiate through cellular gateways, ensuring continuity of data from the OR to the recovery ward to the living room. This continuum fosters subscription revenues for cloud analytics, turning device makers into service providers and reshaping cash-flow profiles across the hemodynamic monitoring market.

Market Share by End User
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Geography Analysis

North America led with 40.20% revenue share in 2024. Market dominance stems from robust ICU infrastructure, favorable private-payer contracts, and early integration of AI modules into perioperative workflows. The region adopts bundled-payment models that reward fewer complications, aligning economic incentives with algorithmic early-warning systems. Partnerships such as Philips and Mass General Brigham’s live-data collaboration illustrate demand for enterprise-scale analytics platforms. 

Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region, with a 6.13% CAGR through 2030. China fuels half the regional gain under Healthy China 2030 policies that subsidize advanced monitors in Tier-2 city hospitals. Japan’s conditional approval pathway shortens time-to-market for breakthrough devices, while India’s expanding middle class spurs private-hospital chains to deploy non-invasive cardiac output modules. Private equity flows into Asian telehealth portfolios further accelerate the hemodynamic monitoring market by financing remote patient monitoring rollouts. 

Europe sustains measured expansion anchored in guideline standardization and perioperative care optimization. ERAS Society endorsements drive procurement of stroke-volume variation monitors across surgical wards. Although Brexit injects dual regulatory pathways, mutual-recognition arrangements keep supply chains stable. Tender committees increasingly demand evidence of cost-utility alongside performance, favoring platforms with peer-reviewed outcome data. 

Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

Consolidation intensified when BD acquired Edwards’ Critical Care portfolio for USD 4.2 billion in 2024, integrating smart sensors, predictive indices, and infusion interoperability under one umbrella. The deal trumped annual sector revenue threefold, highlighting the premium investors place on end-to-end ecosystems that marry hardware with AI. 

Incumbents such as Philips, Masimo, and GE HealthCare respond by embedding cloud-edge analytics and expanding into ward-level deployments. Masimo’s Radius VSM combines multi-parameter bedside monitoring with tetherless wearable transport sensors, underscoring a push toward single-vendor longitudinal coverage from ICU to discharge. GE HealthCare’s Portrait VSM plans to integrate continuous non-invasive blood pressure with machine-learning deterioration scores, positioning the firm for step-down unit growth. 

Disruptors focus on biomarker convergence. Start-ups prototype patch-based lactate sensors and nano-fluidic troponin detectors that could merge hemodynamics with metabolic surveillance, creating new clinical workflows. Partnerships with academic medical centers accelerate validation while leveraging hospital equity stakes for channel access. Competitive intensity is set to remain high as platforms vie to own the primary clinician interface within the hemodynamic monitoring market.

Global Hemodynamic Monitoring Industry Leaders

  1. Koninklijke Philips NV

  2. Edwards Lifesciences Corporation

  3. LiDCO Group PLC

  4. Getinge AB

  5. GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Hemodynamic Monitoring Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • April 2025: BD launched HemoSphere Alta, an advanced hemodynamic monitoring platform featuring AI-driven algorithms, including the Cerebral Autoregulation Index (CAI) for brain blood flow stability assessment and enhanced Acumen Hypotension Prediction Index capabilities. This next-generation platform represents a significant advancement in AI-powered clinical decision support for hemodynamic management.
  • April 2025: Teleflex received FDA 510(k) clearance for the AC3 Range Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP), designed specifically for reliable cardiac support during patient transport with proprietary algorithms and dual power options for challenging transport environments
  • February 2025: Teleflex announced acquisition of BIOTRONIK's Vascular Intervention business for approximately EUR 760 million (USD 820 million), expanding its interventional cardiology portfolio and enhancing innovation pipeline with resorbable scaffold technologies
  • September 2024: Becton, Dickinson, and Company completed the acquisition of Edwards Lifesciences’ critical care product group, which was rebranded as BD Advanced Patient Monitoring. This acquisition enhanced BD's portfolio of smart, connected care solutions by incorporating advanced monitoring technologies and AI-powered clinical decision tools. The technologies from BD Advanced Patient Monitoring were often utilized alongside the BD Alaris Infusion System in operating rooms and intensive care units.
  • July 2024: Edwards Lifesciences agreed to acquire JenaValve and Endotronix for approximately USD 1.2 billion, with Endotronix's Cordella Pulmonary Artery Sensor System receiving FDA approval for heart failure monitoring.

Table of Contents for Global Hemodynamic Monitoring Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Increasing Critically Ill Geriatric Population
    • 4.2.2 Rising Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disorders and Diabetes
    • 4.2.3 Technological Advancements in Minimally and Non-invasive Monitoring
    • 4.2.4 Growing Adoption of Hemodynamic Optimization During ERAS Protocols
    • 4.2.5 AI-driven Predictive Analytics for Early Sepsis and Shock Detection
    • 4.2.6 Wearable Doppler Ultrasound Patches Enabling Remote Monitoring
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Complications Associated with Invasive Monitoring Systems
    • 4.3.2 Stringent FDA / CE Approval Pathways
    • 4.3.3 Alarm Fatigue & Data Overload Reducing Clinical Uptake
    • 4.3.4 Reimbursement Gaps for Peri-operative Optimization Bundles
  • 4.4 Technological Outlook
  • 4.5 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.5.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers / Consumers
    • 4.5.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.5.4 Threat of Substitute Products
    • 4.5.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value in USD)

  • 5.1 By System Type
    • 5.1.1 Minimally Invasive Monitoring Systems
    • 5.1.2 Invasive Monitoring Systems
    • 5.1.3 Non-invasive Monitoring Systems
  • 5.2 By Device
    • 5.2.1 Pulmonary Artery Catheters
    • 5.2.2 Pulse Contour Analysis Devices
    • 5.2.3 Esophageal Doppler Systems
    • 5.2.4 Electrical/Bio-impedance and Bio-reactance Monitors
    • 5.2.5 Volume Clamp / CNAP Devices
    • 5.2.6 Wearable Doppler Ultrasound Patches
    • 5.2.7 Other Devices
  • 5.3 By End User
    • 5.3.1 Hospitals and Clinics
    • 5.3.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    • 5.3.3 Cath Labs and Diagnostic Centers
    • 5.3.4 Home-care and Remote Patient Monitoring
  • 5.4 By Geography
    • 5.4.1 North America
    • 5.4.1.1 United States
    • 5.4.1.2 Canada
    • 5.4.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.4.2 Europe
    • 5.4.2.1 Germany
    • 5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.2.3 France
    • 5.4.2.4 Italy
    • 5.4.2.5 Spain
    • 5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.3.1 China
    • 5.4.3.2 Japan
    • 5.4.3.3 India
    • 5.4.3.4 Australia
    • 5.4.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.4 Middle East & Africa
    • 5.4.4.1 GCC
    • 5.4.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.4.4.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • 5.4.5 South America
    • 5.4.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.4.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
    • 6.3.2 Koninklijke Philips N.V.
    • 6.3.3 Getinge AB
    • 6.3.4 Baxter International Inc.
    • 6.3.5 GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
    • 6.3.6 ICU Medical Inc.
    • 6.3.7 Draegerwerk AG & Co. KGaA
    • 6.3.8 Masimo Corp.
    • 6.3.9 LiDCO Group PLC
    • 6.3.10 Deltex Medical Group PLC
    • 6.3.11 Tensys Medical Inc.
    • 6.3.12 CNSystems Medizintechnik GmbH
    • 6.3.13 Terumo Corp.
    • 6.3.14 Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co.
    • 6.3.15 Nihon Kohden Corp.
    • 6.3.16 Schwarzer Cardiotek GmbH
    • 6.3.17 Uscom Ltd.
    • 6.3.18 Flosonics Medical
    • 6.3.19 Smiths Medical
    • 6.3.20 Change Healthcare

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Global Hemodynamic Monitoring Market Report Scope

As per the report's scope, critically ill patients require continuous monitoring of their vital parameters. This is done by direct pressure monitoring systems, also known as hemodynamic systems. The primary function of these systems is to monitor cardiac activity. The hemodynamic systems give blood pressure, volume, and fluid balance information. The Hemodynamic Monitoring Market is Segmented by System (Minimally Invasive Monitoring Systems, Invasive Monitoring Systems, and Non-invasive Monitoring Systems), Application (Laboratory-based Monitoring Systems, Home-based Monitoring Systems, Hospital-based Monitoring Systems), and, Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa, and South America). The market report also covers the estimated market sizes and trends for 17 countries across major global regions. The report offers the value (USD million) for the above segments.

By System Type Minimally Invasive Monitoring Systems
Invasive Monitoring Systems
Non-invasive Monitoring Systems
By Device Pulmonary Artery Catheters
Pulse Contour Analysis Devices
Esophageal Doppler Systems
Electrical/Bio-impedance and Bio-reactance Monitors
Volume Clamp / CNAP Devices
Wearable Doppler Ultrasound Patches
Other Devices
By End User Hospitals and Clinics
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Cath Labs and Diagnostic Centers
Home-care and Remote Patient Monitoring
By Geography North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
Australia
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East & Africa GCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East & Africa
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
By System Type
Minimally Invasive Monitoring Systems
Invasive Monitoring Systems
Non-invasive Monitoring Systems
By Device
Pulmonary Artery Catheters
Pulse Contour Analysis Devices
Esophageal Doppler Systems
Electrical/Bio-impedance and Bio-reactance Monitors
Volume Clamp / CNAP Devices
Wearable Doppler Ultrasound Patches
Other Devices
By End User
Hospitals and Clinics
Ambulatory Surgical Centers
Cath Labs and Diagnostic Centers
Home-care and Remote Patient Monitoring
By Geography
North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
Australia
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East & Africa GCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East & Africa
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the hemodynamic monitoring market?

The market generated USD 1.19 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 1.45 billion by 2030 at a 4.07% CAGR.

Which system type is growing the fastest?

Non-invasive systems are expanding at a 5.01% CAGR, outpacing minimally invasive and invasive counterparts as hospitals aim to minimize infection risk and improve patient comfort.

How did BD’s acquisition of Edwards Lifesciences impact competition?

The USD 4.2 billion deal created the largest integrated platform spanning invasive and non-invasive modalities, raising the consolidation level across the hemodynamic monitoring market.

Why is Asia-Pacific considered the key growth region?

Aging demographics, expanding hospital infrastructure, and supportive regulatory reforms are driving a 6.13% CAGR in Asia-Pacific, the highest globally.

What role does artificial intelligence play in hemodynamic monitoring?

AI algorithms enable early detection of hypotension, sepsis, and cerebral perfusion issues, improving outcomes and justifying premium pricing for advanced monitoring suites.

How are reimbursement changes influencing adoption?

New Medicare codes for remote physiologic monitoring and European tariffs for non-invasive cardiac output trending are accelerating uptake in home-care and post-acute settings.

Global Hemodynamic Monitoring Market Report Snapshots

Access Report