Global Hemodynamic Monitoring Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Global Hemodynamic Monitoring Market size is estimated at USD 1.19 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 1.45 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 4.07% during the forecast period (2025-2030).
Growth remains steady rather than rapid because providers prioritize cost control and outcome gains, steering investments toward non-invasive platforms and AI-powered analytics that cut complications and staff workload. Aging populations in North America, Europe, Japan, and increasingly China lift the clinical demand curve for continuous cardiovascular surveillance, while hospital-at-home models open fresh demand pockets for remote monitoring hardware and software. Manufacturers respond by integrating goal-directed therapy algorithms, sepsis early-warning scores, and predictive blood-pressure indices into unified dashboards that shorten ICU stays. Competitive dynamics intensified after BD bought Edwards Lifesciences’ Critical Care unit. This deal immediately gave the buyer the largest installed base of intelligent monitors and set an acquisition premium for end-to-end platforms.
Key Report Takeaways
- By system type, minimally invasive technologies held 42.11% of the hemodynamic monitoring market share in 2024, while non-invasive systems are forecast to grow at a 5.01% CAGR to 2030.
- By device, pulmonary artery catheters led with 29.54% of the hemodynamic monitoring market size in 2024; wearable doppler ultrasound patches are poised to expand at a 7.65% CAGR through 2030.
- By end user, hospitals and clinics commanded 51.92% of the hemodynamic monitoring market size in 2024; home-care and remote monitoring settings show the fastest growth at a 4.75% CAGR.
- By geography, North America controlled 40.20% revenue share in 2024, whereas Asia-Pacific is projected to register the highest regional CAGR of 6.13% to 2030.
Global Hemodynamic Monitoring Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
---|---|---|---|
Increasing critically ill geriatric population | +1.2% | North America, Europe, Japan | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
Rising prevalence of cardiovascular disorders & diabetes | +0.9% | Global, higher in developed markets | Medium term (2-4 years) |
Technological advancements in minimally & non-invasive monitoring | +0.8% | North America, EU, APAC | Medium term (2-4 years) |
Growing adoption of hemodynamic optimization during ERAS protocols | +0.6% | North America, Europe, APAC | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
AI-driven predictive analytics for early sepsis & shock detection | +0.4% | North America, EU, selective APAC | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
Wearable Doppler ultrasound patches enabling remote monitoring | +0.3% | North America, global expansion | Medium term (2-4 years) |
Source: Mordor Intelligence
Increasing Critically Ill Geriatric Population
People aged 65 and older are the fastest-growing hospital demographic, driving durable demand for continuous hemodynamic surveillance. Elderly surgical patients experience higher instability rates, and goal-directed therapy reduces complications by 58%, making predictive monitors essential to resource planning. Hospitals favor non-invasive technologies that cut infection risk and improve comfort, and payers reimburse longer observation windows to curb readmissions. Consequently, vendors market platforms that integrate arterial-waveform analytics with frailty scores to guide fluid resuscitation in real time.
Rising Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disorders & Diabetes
Diabetes triples the likelihood of perioperative cardiovascular events, pushing ICUs to adopt dual glucose-and-pressure monitoring suites. FDA clearance of the Sepsis ImmunoScore AI tool, which delivers 85% diagnostic accuracy, illustrates the value of algorithmic triage in mixed-risk patients. Each avoided septic-shock incident saves USD 50,000 in critical-care costs, and hospitals use such economics to justify enterprise-wide rollouts of integrated hemodynamic dashboards.
Technological Advancements in Minimally & Non-Invasive Monitoring
UC San Diego researchers validated wearable ultrasound patches that match arterial-line accuracy in 100+ patients, eliminating catheter-related complications.[1]Ying Li, “Flexible Ultrasound Patches for Continuous Hemodynamic Monitoring,” Nature, nature.com Signal-processing improvements now filter motion artifacts, enabling continuous ward-level surveillance without tethering patients. Reimbursement has started to reflect these gains; several European payers now classify non-invasive cardiac output trending as a separate billable code, accelerating purchases of impedance, volume-clamp, and ultrasound wearables.
Growing Adoption of Hemodynamic Optimization During ERAS Protocols
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery bundles cut length of stay by 3.16 days and postoperative complications by 30% when goal-directed therapy informs fluid and vasopressor use.[2]Shayan Kassirian, “Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Reduces Postoperative Complications by 30%,” BMC Surgery, bmcsurg.biomedcentral.com Hospitals formalize intraoperative monitoring pathways that auto-populate anesthesia records and push alerts to surgical teams. Vendors that supply closed-loop algorithms, smart pumps, and cerebral oximetry in one ecosystem see faster contract wins as perioperative committees favor single-source procurement.
Restraints Impact Analysis
Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
---|---|---|---|
Complications associated with invasive monitoring systems | -0.7% | Global, higher in developing markets | Medium term (2-4 years) |
Stringent FDA / CE approval pathways | -0.5% | North America & Europe | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
Alarm fatigue & data overload reducing clinical uptake | -0.4% | Global, high-volume ICUs | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
Reimbursement gaps for peri-operative optimization bundles | -0.3% | North America & Europe | Medium term (2-4 years) |
Source: Mordor Intelligence
Complications Associated with Invasive Monitoring Systems
Infection, bleeding, and vascular injury occur in 2-15% of catheter insertions, prompting clinicians to reserve invasive lines for only the sickest cases. Studies confirm non-invasive impedance cardiography can replace arterial lines in many moderate-risk surgeries without compromising outcome quality.[3]Pavel Kolar, “Accuracy of Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Monitoring: A Meta-Analysis,” MDPI Sensors, mdpi.com As litigation concerns mount, administrators update protocols to favor ultrasound-guided cannulation or entirely catheter-free modalities.
Stringent FDA / CE Approval Pathways
Regulatory review for algorithm-centric devices now averages 154-201 days, extending R&D cash-burn for start-ups. AI systems must present locked-algorithm performance and post-market drift controls, adding to trial budgets. The FDA’s Quality Management System Regulation, effective February 2026, harmonizes ISO 13485 with 21 CFR 820 but mandates additional cybersecurity evidence, prolonging dossier preparation. Larger incumbents leverage compliance teams to expedite submissions, widening the gap with new entrants.
Segment Analysis
By System Type: Non-Invasive Technologies Drive Innovation
Minimally invasive platforms captured 42.11% of the hemodynamic monitoring market share in 2024, reflecting decades of clinician familiarity and detailed waveform analytics. Yet non-invasive systems top the growth league at a 5.01% CAGR, propelled by miniaturized sensors that match catheter precision and by payer pressure to limit infection-related extensions of stay. Across ICUs and step-down units, staff now rotate between cuffless blood-pressure cuffs for stable cases and arterial-waveform modules for acute decompensation within unified workstations. Hospitals cite reduced line-care costs and faster mobilization to justify capital spending.
Demand momentum signals a structural pivot: vendors bundle impedance cardiography, Doppler ultrasound, and photoplethysmography channels into one dockable chassis, meeting multiple acuity tiers with a single fleet. Software upgrades introduce deep-learning stroke-volume variation calculations that alert staff long before hypotension manifests, embedding clinical decision support at the bedside. As a result, the hemodynamic monitoring market size for non-invasive modalities is projected to add USD 160 million new revenue between 2025 and 2030, narrowing the gap with legacy invasive systems.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Device: Wearable Technologies Disrupt Traditional Monitoring
Pulmonary artery catheters still underpin 29.54% of 2024 revenue due to unmatched mixed-venous oxygen saturation trending in complex cardiac cases. Nevertheless, wearable Doppler ultrasound patches book the swiftest ascent at a 7.65% CAGR, buoyed by favorable human-factors scores and infection-risk elimination. Early adopters document nursing-time savings of 20 minutes per patient per shift when ultrasound patches replace manual cuff cycles.
AI further tilts the field. Edwards’ Acumen Hypotension Prediction Index trims intra-operative hypotension by 57% and ships pre-installed on multiple hardware lines, protecting catheter share while preparing a runway for wearable hybrids. Parallel innovation in volume-clamp rings and bioreactance vests foretell multimodal wearables that stream flow, pressure, and biochemical markers to cloud dashboards. Correspondingly, the hemodynamic monitoring market size for wearables is forecast to climb at twice the pace of any catheter segment, underscoring the shift toward untethered continuous care.
By End User: Remote Monitoring Reshapes Care Delivery
Hospitals and clinics retained 51.92% of 2024 revenue because acute shock and major surgery still require in-house invasive tools. Yet the remote-monitoring category posts a 4.75% CAGR on the back of Medicare billing codes that reimburse up to USD 48 per 30-day cycle for home physiologic monitoring. Health systems pilot hospital-at-home programs where congestive-heart-failure patients receive wireless Doppler patches and tablet dashboards, cutting readmissions by 15%.
Ambulatory surgery centers and cath labs also broaden procurement as day-surgery volumes climb, demanding lightweight monitors that roll between procedure rooms. Vendors differentiate through cellular gateways, ensuring continuity of data from the OR to the recovery ward to the living room. This continuum fosters subscription revenues for cloud analytics, turning device makers into service providers and reshaping cash-flow profiles across the hemodynamic monitoring market.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Geography Analysis
North America led with 40.20% revenue share in 2024. Market dominance stems from robust ICU infrastructure, favorable private-payer contracts, and early integration of AI modules into perioperative workflows. The region adopts bundled-payment models that reward fewer complications, aligning economic incentives with algorithmic early-warning systems. Partnerships such as Philips and Mass General Brigham’s live-data collaboration illustrate demand for enterprise-scale analytics platforms.
Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region, with a 6.13% CAGR through 2030. China fuels half the regional gain under Healthy China 2030 policies that subsidize advanced monitors in Tier-2 city hospitals. Japan’s conditional approval pathway shortens time-to-market for breakthrough devices, while India’s expanding middle class spurs private-hospital chains to deploy non-invasive cardiac output modules. Private equity flows into Asian telehealth portfolios further accelerate the hemodynamic monitoring market by financing remote patient monitoring rollouts.
Europe sustains measured expansion anchored in guideline standardization and perioperative care optimization. ERAS Society endorsements drive procurement of stroke-volume variation monitors across surgical wards. Although Brexit injects dual regulatory pathways, mutual-recognition arrangements keep supply chains stable. Tender committees increasingly demand evidence of cost-utility alongside performance, favoring platforms with peer-reviewed outcome data.

Competitive Landscape
Consolidation intensified when BD acquired Edwards’ Critical Care portfolio for USD 4.2 billion in 2024, integrating smart sensors, predictive indices, and infusion interoperability under one umbrella. The deal trumped annual sector revenue threefold, highlighting the premium investors place on end-to-end ecosystems that marry hardware with AI.
Incumbents such as Philips, Masimo, and GE HealthCare respond by embedding cloud-edge analytics and expanding into ward-level deployments. Masimo’s Radius VSM combines multi-parameter bedside monitoring with tetherless wearable transport sensors, underscoring a push toward single-vendor longitudinal coverage from ICU to discharge. GE HealthCare’s Portrait VSM plans to integrate continuous non-invasive blood pressure with machine-learning deterioration scores, positioning the firm for step-down unit growth.
Disruptors focus on biomarker convergence. Start-ups prototype patch-based lactate sensors and nano-fluidic troponin detectors that could merge hemodynamics with metabolic surveillance, creating new clinical workflows. Partnerships with academic medical centers accelerate validation while leveraging hospital equity stakes for channel access. Competitive intensity is set to remain high as platforms vie to own the primary clinician interface within the hemodynamic monitoring market.
Global Hemodynamic Monitoring Industry Leaders
-
Koninklijke Philips NV
-
Edwards Lifesciences Corporation
-
LiDCO Group PLC
-
Getinge AB
-
GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order

Recent Industry Developments
- April 2025: BD launched HemoSphere Alta, an advanced hemodynamic monitoring platform featuring AI-driven algorithms, including the Cerebral Autoregulation Index (CAI) for brain blood flow stability assessment and enhanced Acumen Hypotension Prediction Index capabilities. This next-generation platform represents a significant advancement in AI-powered clinical decision support for hemodynamic management.
- April 2025: Teleflex received FDA 510(k) clearance for the AC3 Range Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP), designed specifically for reliable cardiac support during patient transport with proprietary algorithms and dual power options for challenging transport environments
- February 2025: Teleflex announced acquisition of BIOTRONIK's Vascular Intervention business for approximately EUR 760 million (USD 820 million), expanding its interventional cardiology portfolio and enhancing innovation pipeline with resorbable scaffold technologies
- September 2024: Becton, Dickinson, and Company completed the acquisition of Edwards Lifesciences’ critical care product group, which was rebranded as BD Advanced Patient Monitoring. This acquisition enhanced BD's portfolio of smart, connected care solutions by incorporating advanced monitoring technologies and AI-powered clinical decision tools. The technologies from BD Advanced Patient Monitoring were often utilized alongside the BD Alaris Infusion System in operating rooms and intensive care units.
- July 2024: Edwards Lifesciences agreed to acquire JenaValve and Endotronix for approximately USD 1.2 billion, with Endotronix's Cordella Pulmonary Artery Sensor System receiving FDA approval for heart failure monitoring.
Global Hemodynamic Monitoring Market Report Scope
As per the report's scope, critically ill patients require continuous monitoring of their vital parameters. This is done by direct pressure monitoring systems, also known as hemodynamic systems. The primary function of these systems is to monitor cardiac activity. The hemodynamic systems give blood pressure, volume, and fluid balance information. The Hemodynamic Monitoring Market is Segmented by System (Minimally Invasive Monitoring Systems, Invasive Monitoring Systems, and Non-invasive Monitoring Systems), Application (Laboratory-based Monitoring Systems, Home-based Monitoring Systems, Hospital-based Monitoring Systems), and, Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa, and South America). The market report also covers the estimated market sizes and trends for 17 countries across major global regions. The report offers the value (USD million) for the above segments.
By System Type | Minimally Invasive Monitoring Systems | ||
Invasive Monitoring Systems | |||
Non-invasive Monitoring Systems | |||
By Device | Pulmonary Artery Catheters | ||
Pulse Contour Analysis Devices | |||
Esophageal Doppler Systems | |||
Electrical/Bio-impedance and Bio-reactance Monitors | |||
Volume Clamp / CNAP Devices | |||
Wearable Doppler Ultrasound Patches | |||
Other Devices | |||
By End User | Hospitals and Clinics | ||
Ambulatory Surgical Centers | |||
Cath Labs and Diagnostic Centers | |||
Home-care and Remote Patient Monitoring | |||
By Geography | North America | United States | |
Canada | |||
Mexico | |||
Europe | Germany | ||
United Kingdom | |||
France | |||
Italy | |||
Spain | |||
Rest of Europe | |||
Asia-Pacific | China | ||
Japan | |||
India | |||
Australia | |||
South Korea | |||
Rest of Asia-Pacific | |||
Middle East & Africa | GCC | ||
South Africa | |||
Rest of Middle East & Africa | |||
South America | Brazil | ||
Argentina | |||
Rest of South America |
Minimally Invasive Monitoring Systems |
Invasive Monitoring Systems |
Non-invasive Monitoring Systems |
Pulmonary Artery Catheters |
Pulse Contour Analysis Devices |
Esophageal Doppler Systems |
Electrical/Bio-impedance and Bio-reactance Monitors |
Volume Clamp / CNAP Devices |
Wearable Doppler Ultrasound Patches |
Other Devices |
Hospitals and Clinics |
Ambulatory Surgical Centers |
Cath Labs and Diagnostic Centers |
Home-care and Remote Patient Monitoring |
North America | United States |
Canada | |
Mexico | |
Europe | Germany |
United Kingdom | |
France | |
Italy | |
Spain | |
Rest of Europe | |
Asia-Pacific | China |
Japan | |
India | |
Australia | |
South Korea | |
Rest of Asia-Pacific | |
Middle East & Africa | GCC |
South Africa | |
Rest of Middle East & Africa | |
South America | Brazil |
Argentina | |
Rest of South America |
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the current size of the hemodynamic monitoring market?
The market generated USD 1.19 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 1.45 billion by 2030 at a 4.07% CAGR.
Which system type is growing the fastest?
Non-invasive systems are expanding at a 5.01% CAGR, outpacing minimally invasive and invasive counterparts as hospitals aim to minimize infection risk and improve patient comfort.
How did BD’s acquisition of Edwards Lifesciences impact competition?
The USD 4.2 billion deal created the largest integrated platform spanning invasive and non-invasive modalities, raising the consolidation level across the hemodynamic monitoring market.
Why is Asia-Pacific considered the key growth region?
Aging demographics, expanding hospital infrastructure, and supportive regulatory reforms are driving a 6.13% CAGR in Asia-Pacific, the highest globally.
What role does artificial intelligence play in hemodynamic monitoring?
AI algorithms enable early detection of hypotension, sepsis, and cerebral perfusion issues, improving outcomes and justifying premium pricing for advanced monitoring suites.
How are reimbursement changes influencing adoption?
New Medicare codes for remote physiologic monitoring and European tariffs for non-invasive cardiac output trending are accelerating uptake in home-care and post-acute settings.