In Vitro Diagnostic Market Size and Share

In Vitro Diagnostic Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

In Vitro Diagnostic Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The In Vitro Diagnostic Market size is estimated at USD 100.08 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 131.55 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 5.62% during the forecast period (2025-2030).

Expansion is propelled by AI-enabled pathology, platform automation, and rapid point-of-care (POC) technologies that compress turnaround times and broaden access to high-value testing. Intensifying chronic disease burdens, an aging population, and payer support for early detection sustain steady test volume growth, while software-centric innovations unlock data-driven clinical decisions. Consolidation has accelerated as incumbents purchase niche innovators to secure next-generation capabilities, though supply-chain fragilities, from enzyme shortages to hurricane-related IV-fluid disruptions, highlight operational risks that shape sourcing strategies. Regulatory shifts run in parallel: the FDA’s laboratory-developed test rule raises compliance costs even as Europe’s IVDR transition extensions delay, not remove, standardization pressures.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By test type, immunodiagnostics led with 29.05% of in vitro diagnostics market share in 2024; molecular diagnostics is projected to expand at a 6.59% CAGR through 2030. 
  • By product, reagents accounted for 55.35% share of the in vitro diagnostics market size in 2024, while software and services is advancing at a 9.35% CAGR to 2030. 
  • By usability, reusable equipment held 75.73% of the in vitro diagnostics market share in 2024; disposable devices are forecast to grow at a 6.56% CAGR. 
  • By application, infectious diseases captured 43.52% revenue share in 2024, whereas oncology is the fastest-growing application at a 7.06% CAGR through 2030. 
  • By end user, hospital laboratories commanded 42.52% of the in vitro diagnostics market size in 2024, but standalone laboratories exhibit a 6.36% CAGR to 2030.
  • By geography, North America led with 38.08% revenue share in 2024; Asia-Pacific is set to record the highest regional CAGR at 6.85% between 2025 and 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Test Type: Molecular Diagnostics Accelerates Despite Immunodiagnostics Dominance

Immunodiagnostics captured 29.05% of in vitro diagnostics market share in 2024, anchored by protein assays indispensable to infectious disease and metabolic testing. Yet molecular diagnostics is forecast to grow 6.59% annually, lifting the segment’s in vitro diagnostics market size as next-generation sequencing, multiplex PCR, and isothermal amplification become mainstays of precision medicine. Roche’s temperature-triggered 12-pathogen PCR further compresses run-times, removing throughput constraints that once limited molecular adoption in decentralized settings. 

Cross-fertilization is rising: hybrid platforms detect nucleic acids and antigens in the same cartridge, blending molecular specificity with immunoassay ease. AI algorithms stitch gene-expression results with serological markers, refining prognostic accuracy in oncology and antimicrobial stewardship. Laboratories thus migrate workloads from legacy immunoassays to low-cost, high-plex nucleic-acid formats, sustaining molecular’s outperformance through 2030.

Market Share
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Product: Software Surge Transforms Traditional Reagent Dominance

Reagents represented 55.35% of in vitro diagnostics market size in 2024, reflecting repeat-purchase economics of consumables. However, software and services are growing at 9.35% CAGR as laboratories invest in AI analytics that unlock workflow efficiencies and predictive insights. Philips and Ibex reported 37% productivity gains when digital pathology AI triaged slides before pathologist review. 

Subscription models convert lumpy analyzer sales into recurring revenue, aligning vendor incentives with outcome-based performance. Cloud-native platforms enable overnight algorithm upgrades and multi-site data pooling for continuous learning. As a result, reagent leaders are bundling algorithm licenses with kit sales, cementing customer lock-in across the in vitro diagnostics market.

By Usability: Disposable Devices Gain Ground Against Reusable Equipment

Reusable analyzers held 75.73% of in vitro diagnostics market share in 2024, yet disposable devices are expanding 6.56% yearly as POC and home-testing demand surges. NYU Abu Dhabi’s paper-based RCP-Chip identifies multiple pathogens in under 10 minutes, ideal for resource-limited or self-testing contexts.

Infection-control guidelines increasingly mandate single-use cartridges to prevent cross-contamination, lowering the cleaning burden for clinics with high patient turnover. Vendors like bioMérieux are investing USD 158.9 million in SpinChip’s platform that delivers cardiac markers from whole blood within minutes, underscoring strategic prioritization of disposables. Combined with shrinking microfluidic fabrication costs, disposable adoption reshapes capital-allocation patterns across the in vitro diagnostics market.

By Application: Oncology Acceleration Challenges Infectious Disease Leadership

Infectious diseases accounted for 43.52% of 2024 revenue as influenza, RSV, and COVID-19 surveillance remained top public-health priorities. However, oncology diagnostics will grow at 7.06% CAGR through 2030, fueled by liquid-biopsy, minimal-residual-disease, and companion diagnostic integration. Labcorp’s purchase of BioReference oncology assets expands menu breadth for tumor sequencing panels and monitoring assays. 

Spatial transcriptomics further propels tissue-based oncology analytics, revealing micro-environment heterogeneity that guides immunotherapy. Cardiology follows closely with high-sensitivity troponin and BNP tests migrating into emergency departments via rapid cartridges, while autoimmune and nephrology diagnostics benefit from novel biomarkers that detect disease earlier than traditional markers, enhancing patient management strategies.

Market Share
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By End User: Standalone Laboratories Outpace Hospital-Based Facilities

Hospital laboratories generated 42.52% of in vitro diagnostics market size in 2024, but standalone labs are slated to grow 6.36% annually as health systems outsource routine tests to cut overhead. Quest’s acquisition of OhioHealth’s outreach network exemplifies this shift, freeing hospitals to focus on inpatient acuity while central labs pursue higher throughput economics. 

Retail clinics and home-use tests expand patient touchpoints; CVS’s Oak Street Health roll-out integrates chronic-care management with on-site diagnostics, reshaping consumer expectations for immediate results. Telehealth platforms now embed sample-collection logistics, providing seamless care workflows that cement the in vitro diagnostics market as a cornerstone of decentralized medicine.

Geography Analysis

North America retained 38.08% in vitro diagnostics market share in 2024 on the back of robust reimbursement, entrenched R&D, and pioneering AI deployments. The FDA’s LDT rule, while costly, could lift quality standards and foster nationwide data interoperability if harmonized across states. Retail health continues to redefine access; CVS and Walgreens deploy POC molecular panels that shorten diagnostic journeys and create new volume streams. Meanwhile, supply-chain shocks, BD culture-media shortages and Baxter IV-fluid disruptions, have prompted renewed investment in domestic manufacturing resiliency.

Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region at 6.85% CAGR, propelled by demographic aging and government funding expansions in Japan, China, and India. Labcorp’s extended tie-up with BML Japan and Sansure’s China joint venture for sepsis assays illustrate cross-border technology transfer that accelerates precision medicine uptake. Domestic Chinese firms are scaling cost-efficient analyzers for export, leveraging experience from vast local screening initiatives. These moves collectively enlarge regional in vitro diagnostics market capacity and foster competitive pricing pressures globally.

Europe posts steady gains despite IVDR turbulence. Transition delays prevent immediate test shortages, yet long-term harmonization is unavoidable, compelling smaller manufacturers to seek strategic partners or exit. The continent commands leadership in spatial-omics and digital pathology, evidenced by Philips-Ibex’s AI edge and Diagnexia’s prostate AI partnership that shortens pathology turnaround. Middle East, Africa, and Latin America build capacity mainly through POC and drug-screening programs, as Intelligent Bio’s collaboration with IVY Diagnostics expands distribution networks that bridge regulatory and cultural gaps.

Growth Rate
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

Market concentration is moderate, with top multinationals—Roche, Abbott, Siemens Healthineers, and Thermo Fisher—possessing diversified portfolios that span reagents, analyzers, and informatics. Their combined share, however, is eroded by relentless niche entrant innovation. Strategic M&A remains the chief lever to close capability gaps: Labcorp invested USD 239 million for Invitae assets and is buying BioReference’s oncology unit, sharpening focus on high-growth segments.

White-space competition converges on AI-powered POC ecosystems. Quest Diagnostics teams with PathAI to augment pathology throughput, while Philips channels Ibex’s algorithms into its IntelliSite platform, enhancing accuracy and reducing pathologist workload. Simultaneously, hardware divestitures open tactical windows: BD’s planned spin-off of a USD 3.4 billion diagnostic unit could realign rankings if a tech-savvy acquirer embeds AI to re-price legacy assets. Ultimately, value accrues to firms uniting reagent chemistry, automated instrumentation, and cloud analytics under one user-centric interface.

In Vitro Diagnostic Industry Leaders

  1. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd

  2. Thermo Fischer Scientific Inc

  3. Siemens Healthineers AG

  4. Abbott Laboratories

  5. bioMerieux SA

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
In Vitro Diagnostic Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • March 2025: Labcorp announced acquisition of select assets from BioReference Health’s oncology and clinical testing businesses, set to close H2 2025 and expand cancer testing revenue.
  • February 2025: Bio-Rad Laboratories accepted binding offer to acquire Stilla Technologies, adding next-generation digital PCR to its portfolio.
  • January 2025: bioMérieux completed purchase of SpinChip Diagnostics, gaining 10-minute whole-blood immunoassay platform aimed at cardiology markers.

Table of Contents for In Vitro Diagnostic Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 High Prevalence Of Chronic Diseases
    • 4.2.2 Expanding Adoption Of Point-Of-Care (POC) Diagnostics
    • 4.2.3 Continuous Platform Innovation (AI, Automation, Multiplexing)
    • 4.2.4 Growing Acceptance Of Personalized / Companion Diagnostics
    • 4.2.5 Retail-Clinic & At-Home Sampling Ecosystems
    • 4.2.6 Convergence Of Spatial-Omics & IVD Workflows
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Stringent Multi-Region Regulatory Approval Timelines
    • 4.3.2 Reimbursement Uncertainty Across Emerging Test Classes
    • 4.3.3 Cyber-Security & Data-Interoperability Gaps In Connected IVD
    • 4.3.4 Enzyme / Reagent Supply-Chain Exposure To Geo-Political Export Controls
  • 4.4 Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Technological Outlook
  • 4.6 Porter's Five Forces
    • 4.6.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.6.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.6.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

  • 5.1 By Test Type
    • 5.1.1 Clinical Chemistry
    • 5.1.2 Immunodiagnostics
    • 5.1.3 Molecular Diagnostics
    • 5.1.4 Hematology
    • 5.1.5 Coagulation
    • 5.1.6 Microbiology
    • 5.1.7 Other Test Types
  • 5.2 By Product
    • 5.2.1 Instruments
    • 5.2.2 Reagents & Kits
    • 5.2.3 Software & Services
  • 5.3 By Usability
    • 5.3.1 Disposable IVD Devices
    • 5.3.2 Re-usable Equipment
  • 5.4 By Application
    • 5.4.1 Infectious Diseases
    • 5.4.2 Diabetes
    • 5.4.3 Oncology
    • 5.4.4 Cardiology
    • 5.4.5 Auto-immune Disorders
    • 5.4.6 Nephrology
    • 5.4.7 Other Applications
  • 5.5 By End User
    • 5.5.1 Stand-alone Laboratories
    • 5.5.2 Hospital-based Laboratories
    • 5.5.3 Point-of-Care Settings
    • 5.5.4 Home-care & Self-testing Users
  • 5.6 Geography
    • 5.6.1 North America
    • 5.6.1.1 United States
    • 5.6.1.2 Canada
    • 5.6.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.6.2 Europe
    • 5.6.2.1 Germany
    • 5.6.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.6.2.3 France
    • 5.6.2.4 Italy
    • 5.6.2.5 Spain
    • 5.6.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.6.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.3.1 China
    • 5.6.3.2 Japan
    • 5.6.3.3 India
    • 5.6.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.6.3.5 Australia
    • 5.6.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.4 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.6.4.1 GCC
    • 5.6.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.6.4.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa
    • 5.6.5 South America
    • 5.6.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.6.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.6.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Business Segments, Financials, Headcount, Key Information, Market Rank, Market Share, Products and Services, and analysis of Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
    • 6.3.2 Abbott Laboratories
    • 6.3.3 Siemens Healthineers AG
    • 6.3.4 Danaher Corp (Beckman Coulter, Cepheid)
    • 6.3.5 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
    • 6.3.6 Sysmex Corp
    • 6.3.7 bioMerieux SA
    • 6.3.8 Becton, Dickinson and Company
    • 6.3.9 Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc.
    • 6.3.10 Qiagen NV
    • 6.3.11 DiaSorin SpA
    • 6.3.12 Grifols SA
    • 6.3.13 Agilent Technologies Inc.
    • 6.3.14 Ortho Clinical Diagnostics / QuidelOrtho
    • 6.3.15 Hologic Inc.
    • 6.3.16 Illumina Inc.
    • 6.3.17 PerkinElmer Inc.
    • 6.3.18 Randox Laboratories Ltd
    • 6.3.19 Meril Diagnostics Pvt Ltd

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Mordor Intelligence defines the in-vitro diagnostics (IVD) market as the aggregate revenue generated by instruments, reagents, kits, software, and services that analyze human blood, urine, tissue, and other specimens outside the body for screening, diagnosis, monitoring, or therapy guidance.

Scope exclusion: investigational-use-only or research-use-only assays are excluded.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Test Type
    • Clinical Chemistry
    • Immunodiagnostics
    • Molecular Diagnostics
    • Hematology
    • Coagulation
    • Microbiology
    • Other Test Types
  • By Product
    • Instruments
    • Reagents & Kits
    • Software & Services
  • By Usability
    • Disposable IVD Devices
    • Re-usable Equipment
  • By Application
    • Infectious Diseases
    • Diabetes
    • Oncology
    • Cardiology
    • Auto-immune Disorders
    • Nephrology
    • Other Applications
  • By End User
    • Stand-alone Laboratories
    • Hospital-based Laboratories
    • Point-of-Care Settings
    • Home-care & Self-testing Users
  • Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • GCC
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East and Africa
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

We validate secondary findings through structured calls with laboratory directors, reagent distributors, hospital procurement leads, and regional regulators across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Latin America, and the Middle East and Africa. Their insights refine price bands, installed-base utilization, and upcoming regulatory inflection points that are hard to capture from public documents alone.

Desk Research

Our analysts map the market landscape through publicly available, high-credibility sources such as the World Health Organization's chronic-disease registries, OECD Health Statistics, the U.S. FDA's device 510(k)/IVDR listings, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services payment schedules, Eurostat trade flows, and peer-reviewed journals that track test-volume trends. Company 10-Ks, investor decks, and trade-association dashboards complement the picture, while paid databases like D&B Hoovers and Dow Jones Factiva let us cross-check revenue splits. The sources named illustrate the range; many additional datasets underpin the model.

Market-Sizing and Forecasting

The baseline is produced with a top-down construct that rebuilds global test-type revenue pools from clinical procedure volumes, average reimbursement tariffs, and import-export values, which are then corroborated with selective bottom-up snapshots, supplier roll-ups, cartridge pull-through ratios, and point-of-care channel checks to adjust for gray-market leakages and kit bundling. Key variables modeled include HbA1c and CRP test counts, molecular cartridge penetration, analyzer replacement cycles, reagent-to-instrument ratios, and average selling-price migration. Forecasts to 2030 employ multivariate regression blended with scenario analysis, where growth levers such as chronic-disease incidence, healthcare spending per capita, and regulatory timetables drive the projections. Data gaps in bottom-up samples are bridged using regional proxy coefficients agreed upon during expert interviews.

Data Validation and Update Cycle

Outputs pass a multi-layer review: automated variance flags, peer analyst audits, and a senior analyst sign-off. Reports are refreshed annually; interim updates trigger when policy shifts, major M&A, or pandemic-scale events materially alter assumptions. A final validation pass occurs before client delivery.

Why Mordor's In Vitro Diagnostic Baseline Commands Confidence

Published estimates often diverge because firms pick differing product mixes, price assumptions, and refresh rhythms.

Key gap drivers include: some publishers fold research-only consumables into market value, others apply uniform global price points ignoring regional reimbursement cuts, and a few project forward using linear COVID-era test demand. Mordor's disciplined scope alignment, variable-level calibration, and annual refresh provide a balanced midpoint.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 100.08 B Mordor Intelligence -
USD 109.07 B Global Consultancy A Includes RUO assays and uniform ASP escalation
USD 114.25 B Data Publisher B Uses supplier revenue without adjusting for double counting across channels
USD 77.73 B Industry Forecasting C Excludes point-of-care kits and home-use tests

Taken together, the comparison shows that while other studies tilt higher or lower by expanding or narrowing scope, Mordor's carefully screened inputs, regular primary validation, and transparent math give decision-makers a dependable, traceable baseline.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the in vitro diagnostics market?

The in vitro diagnostics market was valued at USD 100.08 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 131.55 billion by 2030.

Which test type is growing fastest within the in vitro diagnostics market?

Molecular diagnostics leads growth with a 6.59% CAGR, driven by multiplex PCR, next-generation sequencing, and precision-medicine adoption.

Why are software and services gaining importance in the in vitro diagnostics industry?

Laboratories are investing in AI analytics and cloud workflow tools that deliver productivity gains of up to 37%, pushing the segment to a 9.35% CAGR.

How will new FDA regulations affect the in vitro diagnostics market?

The FDA’s laboratory-developed test rule may add up to USD 3.56 billion in compliance costs, challenging small innovators yet potentially improving test quality and data harmonization.

Which region will expand fastest through 2030?

Asia-Pacific is expected to grow at 6.85% annually, supported by expanding healthcare infrastructure, larger aging populations, and chronic disease prevalence.

What strategic moves are major companies making to stay competitive?

Leaders are acquiring niche innovators—such as Labcorp buying BioReference oncology assets and bioMérieux purchasing SpinChip—to secure rapid-test technologies and AI-enabled platforms that differentiate their portfolios.

Page last updated on:

In Vitro Diagnostic Market Report Snapshots