Aircraft Landing Gear Systems Market Size and Share

Aircraft Landing Gear Systems Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The aircraft landing gear systems market size is expected to grow from USD 11.82 billion in 2025 to USD 12.76 billion in 2026 and is forecasted to reach USD 18.42 billion by 2031 at a 7.62% CAGR over 2026-2031. Composite struts, electromechanical actuation, and sensor-rich assemblies are transitioning from prototypes to high-rate production, providing suppliers with a path to premium pricing on narrow-body and military platforms. Demand is amplified by a production backlog exceeding 17,000 commercial jets, with Airbus and Boeing targeting a combined 1,200 single-aisle deliveries in 2026, each shipset valued at USD 1.5 million to USD 2.0 million. Defense programs add resiliency: F-35, F-15EX, and tanker replacements require ruggedized gear that tolerates rough-field operations and stealth-driven packaging constraints. Urban air mobility (UAM) platforms from Joby and Archer are expected to enter low-rate production in 2026, creating a niche for additive-manufactured titanium components that reduce lead times from 12 months to six weeks. Finally, digital-twin maintenance platforms, led by Safran, Collins, and Honeywell, reduce unscheduled removals by 25% and reshape aftermarket economics toward condition-based overhaul models.
Key Report Takeaways
- By aircraft type, commercial aviation held 40.21% of the aircraft landing gear systems market share in 2025, while military aviation recorded the fastest growth at an 11.56% CAGR through 2031.
- By gear position, main assemblies commanded a 72.78% revenue share in 2025 and are projected to expand at a 10.43% CAGR through 2031.
- By material, composites accounted for 13.76% of the aircraft landing gear systems market size in 2025 and are set to grow at a 13.76% CAGR between 2026 and 2031.
- By end user, OEM channels captured 63.65% revenue share in 2025, whereas the aftermarket segment is projected to post an 8.78% CAGR to 2031.
- By subsystems, the structural system commanded 43.67% of the aircraft landing gear systems market size in 2025, while actuation systems are growing at a 11.56% CAGR through 2031.
- By geography, Asia-Pacific led with a 34.56% share in 2025; South America is forecasted to register the highest 14.29% CAGR through 2031.
Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.
Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis of Aircraft Landing Gear Systems Market*
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Commercial aircraft production ramp-ups post-2025 | +2.10% | Global; concentrated in APAC and North America | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Lightweight-materials demand surge | +1.80% | Global; APAC; North America | Medium term (2–4 years) |
| OEM push for electric/hydraulic-free eBrake systems | +1.20% | North America & Europe; spillover to APAC | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Digital twin-enabled predictive maintenance | +1.00% | Global; early adoption in North America and Europe | Medium term (2–4 years) |
| MRO outsourcing and exchange-service adoption | +0.90% | Global; mature markets in North America and Europe | Medium term (2–4 years) |
| Urban air mobility (eVTOL/air-taxi) landing-gear volumes | +0.70% | North America; Europe; select APAC cities | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Commercial Aircraft Production Ramp-ups Post-2025
Airbus and Boeing aim for a combined 1,200 narrowbody deliveries in 2026, underpinned by firm orders from IndiGo, Southwest, and United Airlines. Each aircraft embeds landing-gear systems priced between USD 1.5 million and USD 2.0 million, locking in multi-year visibility. China’s COMAC C919 program is expected to add localized demand, with Liebherr delivering 100 shipsets by September 2024. However, titanium shortfalls and fuselage-quality defects at key Tier-1 suppliers trimmed Airbus’s 2025 target by 10 units, illustrating the fragility of the supply chain that cascades to gear makers.
Lightweight-materials Demand Surge
Airframers target 25% to 30% weight cuts in landing-gear assemblies to meet ICAO’s 2% annual carbon-intensity mandate. Cranfield University demonstrated a 30% mass saving when carbon-fiber struts replaced steel baselines during 50,000-cycle fatigue tests. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries applied resin-transfer molding to torque links and drag braces, resulting in a 20% reduction in recurring costs. Although titanium alloys cost four times more than steel, lifecycle fuel savings of USD 200,000 per widebody justify the premium. The shift strains supply chains because sanctions have removed Russian titanium sponge, forcing the qualification of Japanese and Kazakh alternatives that require an 18-month lead time.
OEM Push for Electric/hydraulic-free eBrake Systems
The B787 introduced electromechanical brakes in 2011, but fleet-wide adoption did not occur until Clean Aviation’s electric nose-gear trials delivered 15% weight and 20% maintenance savings in 2024. Airbus intends to retrofit eBrakes on A320neo derivatives entering service in 2027, while Boeing has a similar roadmap for the B737 MAX. Eliminating hydraulic pumps removes 50 pounds of fluid and plumbing, enhances dispatch reliability, and shifts value toward suppliers with power-electronics expertise. Eaton and Safran formed a USD 50 million joint venture to industrialize electric actuators by 2027.[1]“Eaton-Safran Electric Landing Gear JV,” Eaton Corporation, eaton.com
Digital Twin-Enabled Predictive Maintenance
Safran’s LifePulse, Collins’ Predictive Suite, and Honeywell Forge stream wheel speed, brake temperature, and strut strain data into cloud models that predict failures 30-60 days in advance. Early adopter airlines cut unscheduled removals by 25% and lengthened overhaul intervals by 15%. The practice fragments the aftermarket because carriers with in-house analytics bypass third-party shops, negotiating direct-repair agreements that reduce out-of-service time below 72 hours. Regulators have yet to harmonize data-validation standards, creating compliance gaps between FAA and EASA rules.
Restraints Impact Analysis of Aircraft Landing Gear Systems Market*
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Titanium and composite supply-chain bottlenecks | -1.3% | Global; acute in Europe and North America | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Regulatory certification delays for novel architectures | -0.9% | Global; concentrated in North America and Europe | Medium term (2–4 years) |
| High capex and eight-to-ten-year overhaul costs | -0.6% | Global; more pronounced in emerging markets | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| OEM–airline power-by-the-hour dominance squeezing independents | -0.5% | North America and Europe; spillover to APAC | Medium term (2–4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Titanium and Composite Supply-chain Bottlenecks
Sanctions removed 30% of global aerospace-grade titanium sponge, driving alloy prices from USD 35/kg in 2021 to USD 50/kg in 2024. Landing-gear shipsets for widebodies now cost USD 150,000 to USD 250,000 more, cutting OEM margins by up to 300 basis points. Composite output is also constrained: resin shortages linked to petrochemical outages have delayed Airbus A350 deliveries. At the same time, autoclave capacity caps CFRP strut output at 1,200 units per year, which is below industry demand. Only 12 forging houses own 40,000-ton presses, so any surge beyond 1,200 narrowbody units risks allocation shortages.
Regulatory Certification Delays for Novel Architectures
FAA and EASA mandate 1,500–2,000 flight-test hours for new landing-gear designs, and any failure restarts the clock, delaying revenue by 12–18 months and adding USD 20 million–USD 40 million in engineering costs. Clean Aviation’s eNLG demo remains in approval queues despite validated weight savings. Archer’s eVTOL slipped from 2025 to late 2026 after regulators demanded extra high-sink-rate tests. Divergent maintenance rules add complexity: The FAA allows condition-based overhaul, while the EASA still enforces calendar-based triggers, forcing airlines to manage dual maintenance programs.[2] “Special Condition for VTOL Aircraft,” European Union Aviation Safety Agency, easa.europa.eu
*Our forecasts treat driver/restraint impacts as directional, not additive. The impact forecasts reflect baseline growth, mix effects, and variable interactions.
Aircraft Landing Gear Systems Market Segment Analysis
By Aircraft Type:
Commercial Aircraft Dominate, Military AcceleratesMilitary programs posted an 11.56% CAGR to 2031, fueled by the F-35, F-15EX, and unmanned combat platforms requiring stealth-compatible gear that retracts flush with the fuselage.[3]“F-35 Lightning II Program,” Lockheed Martin, lockheedmartin.com The aircraft landing gear systems market size for combat fleets is projected to increase through 2031, driven by multi-decade sustainment budgets that schedule overhauls every 2,000 flight hours. Non-combat tankers and transports adopt civil-derivative gear to curb cost, yet still face 30% price uplifts for rough-field operation kits. Across Asia, Japan, India, and South Korea are inducting indigenous fighters that specify local content in landing-gear assemblies, diversifying the supplier map.
Commercial aviation remains the revenue anchor with a 40.21% share in 2025. Narrowbodies represent 75% of deliveries, averaging three daily cycles that accelerate brake wear and feed the aftermarket. Widebodies carry triple the mass per shipset, yet they grow in mid-single digits, because airlines prioritize fleet commonality over long-haul expansion. Regional jets and turboprops serve secondary-city routes in Latin America and Southeast Asia, necessitating reinforced gear for short, hot-and-high runways, which increases unit prices by USD 100,000 per aircraft.

By Gear Position:
Main Gear Holds Mass, Nose Gear InnovatesMain landing-gear assemblies held a 72.78% revenue share in 2025 and are expected to advance at a 10.43% CAGR through 2031, as twin-aisle and heavy-lift military programs recover. A B777X main gear tips the scales at 12,000 pounds and sells for USD 2.5 million to USD 3.0 million, reflecting the use of six-wheel bogies and titanium forgings certified for 500,000-pound loads. Carbon-ceramic brake discs, costing USD 40,000-USD 60,000 each, require replacement every 2,500 landings, securing lucrative aftermarket streams that outstrip original equipment revenue by three-to-one across a 25-year life.
Nose gear's 27.22% share belies its strategic role in steering and anti-skid sensing. Clean Aviation's eNLG prototype reduced weight by 50 pounds by switching to electromechanical steering, thereby extending maintenance intervals to 12,000 hours. Composite struts are viable on narrow-body nose gear because loads represent only 15% of the aircraft's weight. However, eVTOL designs invert load maps, placing 60% of the load on the aft axles during ground operations, which requires adaptive dampers priced at nearly USD 100,000 per shipset.
By Material:
Steels Still Rule, Composites SurgeHigh-strength steel alloys still account for 47.81% of 2025 shipments thanks to fatigue strength and cost advantages. Yet composites are set to expand at a 13.76% CAGR, as Airbus plans to use CFRP nose struts for the A320neo in 2027, delivering a 200-pound savings and a USD 40,000 annual fuel benefit. Hybrid architectures pair CFRP beams with steel torque links, striking a balance between weight and crashworthiness. Titanium maintains a roughly 30% share of the widebody and military primary gear market because it withstands salt-spray corrosion and absorbs high energy, although supply risks and 18-month lead times put pressure on margins.
Aluminum alloys retreat to general aviation niches where low load and cost sensitivity dominate. Additive-manufactured titanium struts, certified aboard Triumph-supplied F-15EX gear, cut material waste by 70% yet await volume scaling until regulators finalize batch-consistency rules.

By End User:
OEM Share Solid, Aftermarket Momentum BuildsOEM channels accounted for 63.65% of 2025 revenue, aligning with the surging narrowbody output. Nevertheless, the aftermarket segment is gaining at an 8.78% CAGR. Fleet age averages 11 years; once aircraft cross 12–15 years, landing-gear overhauls climb from USD 400,000 to USD 600,000, lifting shop-visit income. Power-by-the-hour contracts now capture 40% of narrowbody aftermarket spending, shifting risk from airlines to OEMs while compressing margins for independent shops that cannot finance exchange pools. Data-rich predictive maintenance reduces MRO frequency but increases the value of each visit through more comprehensive refurbishment scopes.
By Sub-Systems:
Electrification Drives Actuation GrowthActuation systems are expanding at an 11.56% CAGR through 2031, the fastest pace among sub-systems. They are projected to surpass USD 2 billion in revenue by the end of the period, steadily lifting their contribution to the overall aircraft landing gear systems market size. The shift is propelled by electromechanical actuators that eliminate 50 pounds of hydraulic fluid per aircraft, extend inspection intervals from 8,000 to 12,000 flight hours, and deliver 15% weight savings validated by Clean Aviation’s electric-nose-gear trials completed in 2024.[4]“Electric Nose Landing Gear Project,” Clean Aviation, clean-aviation.eu FAA Advisory Circular 25-7D, issued the same year, codified certification criteria for electric actuation, unlocking wider adoption across the A320neo and B737 MAX families, which were scheduled for entry into service in 2027. Eaton and Safran formed a USD 50 million R&D joint venture in February 2024 to commercialize electric landing-gear actuators, aiming to capture a 20% share of the actuation-system aircraft landing gear systems market by 2031.
Structural systems retained the highest 43.67% revenue share in 2025, anchored in load-bearing components such as struts, torque links, drag braces, and axles, which account for more than half of the manufacturing cost due to titanium forgings and composite layups designed to absorb 500,000-pound vertical loads. Only 12 forging houses worldwide possess 40,000-ton presses needed for main-strut production, creating an 18-month lead-time bottleneck that concentrates pricing power among a handful of suppliers serving Safran, Collins, and Liebherr. Composite adoption remains limited to lower-weight regional jets and business aircraft due to fatigue-cycle exposure, with more than 50,000 takeoff–landing events over 20 years, which still favors steel and titanium on larger models.
Geography Analysis
APAC Aircraft Landing Gear Systems Market
The Asia-Pacific region owned 34.56% of the 2025 revenue, led by China and India. COMAC plans 150 C919 deliveries per year from 2028, and India’s 970-unit order pipeline will add USD 3.5 billion in landing-gear demand this decade. Regional connectivity initiatives under UDAN stimulate turboprop replacements, which require rough-field kits that cost 20% more than baseline systems. Japan supplies titanium forgings and composite struts for the B787 and A350 programs, maintaining high domestic plant utilization despite flat demand from local airlines.
South America Aircraft Landing Gear Systems Market
South America is projected to deliver the fastest growth, with a 14.29% CAGR through 2031, primarily driven by Embraer’s E2 family and government subsidies for underserved routes. Brazil’s carriers are replacing their aging E1 jets with E2 variants, which feature composite torque links that extend overhaul intervals to 12,000 cycles. Chile, Peru, and Colombia invest in high-altitude airport upgrades that require reinforced gear, lifting per-unit value by up to 30%.
North America and EMEA Aircraft Landing Gear Systems Market
North America and Europe account for half of the global revenue, growing at mid-single digits. A 3,000-unit narrowbody backlog sustains OEM demand, yet supply constraints shift revenue into the aftermarket. EASA now allows condition-based maintenance for sensor-equipped assemblies, enabling Lufthansa and Air France-KLM to extend overhaul spacing, whereas the FAA retains a mixed approach. Middle East fleets are young and widebody-heavy, supporting premium gear sales but limited overhaul activity. Africa remains a nascent market; Ethiopian Airlines dominates capacity, and ruggedized kits for unpaved runways offer a small but strategic foothold.

Regulatory Landscape
Aircraft landing gear systems are governed by airworthiness requirements in FAA 14 CFR Part 25 (Subpart D) and EASA CS-25 for large aeroplanes, which set performance and design constraints for shock absorption, retraction mechanisms, wheels and tires, steering, and braking. These certification baselines carry high test burdens (commonly 1,500-2,000 flight-test hours for new gear architectures) and slow the adoption cycle for composite primary structures and electromechanical actuation.
In 2026, model-specific EASA Airworthiness Directives reinforced ongoing compliance and life-limit management in service. EASA AD 2026-0007 (effective 28 January 2026) mandated component life-limit implementation for Airbus A300 landing gear, while AD 2026-0092 (effective 25 May 2026) and AD 2026-0114 (effective 26 June 2026) required inspections on Airbus A350 main landing gear bogie pivot pins and bushes and main landing gear axles, respectively, highlighting how AD-driven inspection cycles and part replacements shape aftermarket demand and updates to maintenance programs.
Value Chain Analysis
The value chain starts with raw materials and semi-finished inputs (high-strength steels, titanium alloys, aluminum, and composite prepregs and resins), then moves through forging and casting, heat treatment, precision machining, surface treatments (including electroplating), and sub-assembly of struts, bogie beams, torque links, braces, and actuators. System-level integration adds wheels, brakes, anti-skid electronics, steering, and health-monitoring software before delivery to airframe OEM final assembly lines, with the same industrial base supporting spares for exchange pools and scheduled overhauls.
Tier-1 landing gear integrators such as Safran Landing Systems, Collins Aerospace (RTX), Liebherr, Héroux-Devtek, and Triumph coordinate dense Tier-2 networks, where capacity constraints in critical processes and heavy-forging equipment can become rate limiters (only a limited number of forging houses operate very large presses). Downstream, distribution and MRO rely on strict traceability and quality frameworks, including Aviation Suppliers Association (ASA) programs (ASA-100) and FAA guidance such as AC 00-56 for parts documentation and supply-chain integrity, which affects which brokers, repair stations, and component shops can participate in OEM-approved ecosystems and authorized repair networks.
Competitive Landscape
Safran SA, Collins Aerospace (RTX Corporation), and Liebherr Group control a significant portion of the global sales market. Safran manages over 1,000 exchange shipsets, promising a 24-hour turnaround that independents cannot match without a USD 300 million inventory. Collins cross-sells avionics and actuation, lowering integration costs and locking OEMs into bundled contracts. Liebherr secured a sole-source position on China’s C919 through a joint venture in Changsha, ensuring compliance with local content requirements.
White-space opportunities cluster around UAM and additive manufacturing. GKN and GE Additive supply 3D-printed titanium struts for Joby’s air taxi, cutting lead times from 12 months to six weeks. Independent MROs face shrinking margins, yet retrofit kits, such as carbon-ceramic brakes for 737NG fleets, offer a USD 700 million addressable niche. Data analytics firms like Uptake partner with regional shops to offer vendor-agnostic predictive maintenance, challenging OEM platforms.
Aircraft Landing Gear Systems Industry Leaders
Safran SA
Honeywell International Inc.
Collins Aerospace (RTX Corporation)
Liebherr Group
Héroux-Devtek Inc.
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order

Aircraft Landing Gear Systems Market Companies Covered in this Report
- Safran SA
- Collins Aerospace (RTX Corporation)
- Liebherr Group
- Héroux-Devtek Inc.
- Triumph Group, Inc.
- GKN Aerospace Services Limited
- Honeywell International, Inc.
- Eaton Corporation plc
- Magellan Aerospace Corporation
- Whippany Actuation Systems LLC (TransDigm Group)
- CIRCOR International, Inc.
- Parker-Hannifin Corporation
- SPP Canada Aircraft, Inc.
- Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd.
Market Opportunities and Future Outlook
Aftermarket and exchange programs are a clear opportunity as airlines push for faster turn times and seek to shift inventory risk amid component scarcity and long lead times. In February 2026, Boeing signed its largest landing gear exchange contract with Singapore Airlines Group, covering more than 75 aircraft across 737 MAX and 787 fleets, and the deal underscores how large operators are using exchange pools to stabilize availability and reduce AOG exposure. It supports demand for serialized shipset inventory, regional overhaul throughput, and tighter digital configuration control.
Industrial diversification and new platform entry also create openings for suppliers that can qualify to Tier-1 requirements while improving geographic resilience. In April 2026, Liebherr-Aerospace signed a long-term agreement with Jeh Aerospace to manufacture high-precision landing gear components from Hyderabad, and in June 2026 Deutsche Aircraft disclosed plans to design and offer its own landing gear for the Dornier 328eco and legacy D328 as a way to mitigate supply-chain delays. On the product side, electrification and weight-reduction initiatives, including electric actuation and composite or topology-optimized structures validated in recent programs, continue to increase the value of power electronics, sensor integration, and advanced materials and process capabilities across both OEM shipsets and retrofit-adjacent spares streams (excluding full conversion retrofits from this market definition).
Recent Industry Developments in Aircraft Landing Gear Systems Market
- June 2026: Safran Landing Systems expanded global MRO capabilities for the Boeing 787, Airbus A350, and Airbus A330, including an expansion of its Queretaro, Mexico facility that added 6,000 square meters of workshop space. The added footprint increases overhaul throughput for high-value widebody gear and helps shorten turnaround times as airlines rely more on exchange and outsourced maintenance models.
- May 2026: Liebherr-Aerospace and Finnair signed a service agreement covering the overhaul of nose landing gear systems on Finnair's Airbus A350 fleet, with work performed at Liebherr's Lindenberg, Germany site through 2034. The long-duration agreement provides visibility for capacity planning and supports continued investment in specialized tooling and processes for sensor-rich, high-cycle gear.
- June 2025: Safran and Revima strengthened their landing gear collaboration to deepen joint support across repair and overhaul activities. The move reinforces OEM-aligned aftermarket networks by combining exchange, repair specialization, and global service coverage, tightening competitive pressure on independent MROs that lack comparable access to parts and approvals.
Aircraft Landing Gear Systems Market Report Scope and Research Methodology
Market Definition and Coverage
This market covers the revenue generated from aircraft landing gear systems that help an aircraft take off, land, taxi, and stop safely, including main and nose gear assemblies and their core mechanical and control sub-systems.
Scope exclusions: Excludes retrofit-only conversions and unrelated aircraft subsystems (such as avionics, engines, or cabin systems) to avoid overlap and double counting.
Segments Covered in This Report
- By Aircraft Type
- Commercial Aviation
- Narrowbody Aircraft
- Widebody Aircraft
- Regional Aircraft
- Military Aviation
- Combat Aircraft
- Non-Combat Aircraft
- Helicopters
- General Aviation
- Business Jets
- Turboprop Aircraft
- Piston Aircraft
- Helicopters
- Commercial Aviation
- By Gear Position
- Nose Landing Gear
- Main/Undercarriage Landing Gear
- By Material
- High-Strength Steel Alloys
- Titanium Alloys
- Composites (CFRP/GFRP)
- Aluminum Alloys
- By End User
- Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM)
- Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO)
- By Subsystem
- Actuation System
- Steering System
- Braking System
- Structural System
- Other Sub-Systems
- By Geography
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Mexico
- Europe
- United Kingdom
- France
- Germany
- Spain
- Russia
- Rest of Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- China
- India
- Japan
- South Korea
- Rest of Asia-Pacific
- South America
- Brazil
- Rest of South America
- Middle East and Africa
- Middle East
- United Arab Emirates
- Saudi Arabia
- Egypt
- Rest of Middle East
- Africa
- South Africa
- Rest of Africa
- Middle East
- North America
Data Sources, Market Sizing, and Validation
Desk Research
Desk work starts by mapping aircraft production and fleet activity, because landing gear demand is tightly linked to deliveries and overhaul cycles. We mainly rely on public aviation and trade sources such as FAA and EASA airworthiness and fleet data, ICAO air transport indicators, UN Comtrade trade statistics, and defense procurement budget documents where available.
To refine assumptions, program announcements, annual reports, and investor presentations are reviewed for platform ramp ups, aftermarket exposure, and long term support patterns. Patent databases are used to understand technology direction (for example, electric actuation and health monitoring) and to sanity check the pace of design change. In selected cases, paid subscriptions for company financials and intelligence, aviation aircraft level databases, and global contracts and tenders are used to cross check volumes and program timing. These examples are not exhaustive, and many other public sources were also referred to for data collection, validation, and clarification.
Primary Interviews and Surveys
Primary inputs are gathered through expert interviews and structured surveys with people involved in aircraft manufacturing, landing gear component supply, MRO operations, and aviation procurement. We use these discussions to confirm what is counted as a landing gear system sale versus a service event, and to align ASP movement with material mix, certification loads, and overhaul intervals across major regions.
Distribution of primary research fieldwork respondents
| Company type | Respondent position | Region |
|---|---|---|
| Top tier: 37% | CXOs: 13% | APAC: 40% |
| Mid tier: 41% | Functional/Unit leaders: 39% | EMEA: 37% |
| Smaller Players: 22% | Managers: 48% | Americas: 23% |
Market-Sizing & Forecasting
Sizing is built using a top-down approach where aircraft delivery schedules, active fleet size, and expected shop visit cycles are used to reconstruct the demand pool for shipsets and major replacements, and then converted into value using realistic ASP ranges. The model is then corroborated with selective bottom-up approximations, such as sampled shipset pricing by aircraft class and channel checks on overhaul content, which helps us adjust totals when a single input looks overstated.
Key inputs include fixed wing versus rotary wing output trends, narrowbody and widebody build rates, landing gear overhaul intervals and rotable pool behavior, brake and wheel replacement intensity, and the share of electrified or digitally monitored systems that changes content value over time. Forecasting is handled through scenario analysis supported by a light multivariate regression, where the explanatory variables are aircraft deliveries, utilization indicators, and defense procurement momentum, and the final path is confirmed through expert consensus. Where supplier roll ups are incomplete, gaps are handled by applying validated share ranges by aircraft category and by checking that implied unit volumes stay consistent with production and fleet metrics.
Data Validation & Update Cycle
Outputs are checked through triangulation across independent signals, so the final totals match what aircraft build rates and maintenance cycles can realistically support. Variance checks are run across regions and aircraft categories, and any sharp jumps are reviewed against known program events, certification delays, and currency timing before sign off.
A multi step review is followed internally, and experts are re contacted when assumptions drift from what the market is showing (for example, if delivery schedules change or MRO demand moves faster than expected). Reports are refreshed annually, and interim updates are made when material events occur. Before delivery, an analyst completes a fresh pass of key inputs so clients receive the latest updated view.
Mordor Intelligence's Aircraft Landing Gear Systems Market Sizing Compared With Other Published Estimates
Published market size figures for aircraft landing gear do not always match, even when the topic sounds the same, because the scope can shift in small ways that change the total by billions of dollars. Differences usually come from what is counted as a system versus a component, how aftermarket activity is treated, and which aircraft categories are included.
The main gap comes from mixing full system revenues with broader undercarriage components and some service value, where Mordor Intelligence counts newly manufactured main and nose gear systems plus related actuation, steering, and braking sub-systems, and it keeps retrofit-only conversions out to prevent double counting. Other estimates can also drift when they apply aggressive delivery ramps, use a single ASP escalation rule across platforms, or rely on a base year that is not aligned with aircraft program timing and currency conversion dates.
Benchmark comparison
| Source | Market Size | Gaps in Research Methodology |
|---|---|---|
| Mordor Intelligence | USD 12.76 B (2026) | |
| Global Consultancy A | USD 14.98 B (2025) | Uses a different base year and may include a wider undercarriage scope with additional component and service value, which lifts the total versus a manufacturing-focused system count. |
| Industry Research Group B | USD 10.70 B (2024) | Uses an earlier base year and a demand framing that can understate value if fleet utilization recovery and content growth from higher specification systems are not fully reflected. |
The spread across the table is mainly explained by scope and timing, not by arithmetic mistakes. When the demand pool is tied to deliveries and overhaul cycles, and when system boundaries are kept consistent across OEM and replacement events, the resulting number stays easier to trace and repeat year to year.
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the 2026 size of the aircraft landing gear systems market and its expected CAGR through 2031?
The aircraft landing gear systems market size is USD 12.76 billion in 2026 and is projected to reach USD 18.42 billion by 2031, reflecting a 7.62% CAGR over the forecast period.
Which sub-system category is forecast to expand the quickest by 2031?
Actuation systems lead with an 11.56% CAGR thanks to rapid adoption of electromechanical actuators.
Why are electromechanical actuators overtaking hydraulic units?
They remove 50 pounds of fluid, cut maintenance intervals from 8,000 to 12,000 flight hours, and deliver 15% weight savings validated in 2024 trials.
Which region is expected to log the highest growth to 2031?
South America posts a 14.29% CAGR, outperforming all other geographies on the back of Embraer E2 deliveries and regional-connectivity programs.
How do composite materials influence landing-gear weight and upkeep costs?
Carbon-fiber struts trim up to 30% mass and can lower lifetime fuel burn by roughly USD 200,000 per widebody while extending overhaul intervals.
Who currently controls the largest share of global revenue?
Safran Landing Systems, Collins Aerospace, and Liebherr together account for a significant share of global revenue.
In what way does predictive maintenance reduce unscheduled removals?
Sensor-rich digital twins warn of failures 30–60 days early, allowing airlines to cut unexpected gear removals by around 25%.
Page last updated on:




