Sulfur Fertilizer Market Size and Share

Sulfur Fertilizer Market Summary
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Sulfur Fertilizer Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The sulfur fertilizers market reached USD 5.1 billion in 2025 and is projected to climb to USD 6.5 billion by 2030, advancing at a 4.9% CAGR during the forecast period. Gains stem from the sharp decline in atmospheric sulfur deposition, which has fallen more than 70% since the 1990s, leaving soils depleted and crops increasingly responsive to applied sulfur. The Asia-Pacific region leads consumption on the back of China’s 48.9 million metric tons annual fertilizer use and India’s expanding precision fertilization programs. Africa represents the fastest-growing regional opportunity as infrastructure upgrades and food-security initiatives accelerate balanced nutrient adoption. Industry momentum is further supported by refinery desulfurization streams that now provide more than 60% of all elemental sulfur used in fertilizer manufacturing, although supply can tighten whenever refining margins compress.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By type, sulfate fertilizers led with 51% of the sulfur fertilizers market share in 2024, while elemental sulfur is projected to grow at a 6.7% CAGR through 2030. 
  • By form, solid products accounted for 70% of the sulfur fertilizers market share in 2024, whereas liquid formulations are advancing at a 7.2% CAGR to 2030. 
  • By mode of application, soil application captured 60% of the sulfur fertilizers market size in 2024, while controlled release and coated granules represent the fastest track at an 8.0% CAGR through 2030. 
  • By crop, oilseeds and pulses held 40% of the sulfur fertilizers market share in 2024, while fruits and vegetables are forecast to expand at a 6.7% CAGR to 2030. 
  • By distribution channel, retail dealers secured 45% of global revenue in 2024, and online platforms are set to grow at a 9.1% CAGR through 2030. 
  • By geography, Asia-Pacific dominated with a 37% share in 2024, and Africa is anticipated to record the fastest growth at a 6.4% CAGR to 2030.
  • The top five suppliers controlled 51% of global revenue in 2024, with Nutrien leading at 14% followed by Yara International at 12% and Mosaic at 10%. 

Segment Analysis

By Type: Sulfate Dominance Faces Elemental Challenge

In 2024, sulfate fertilizers such as ammonium sulfate, potassium sulfate, and single superphosphate delivered 51% of global revenue, reflecting their immediate plant availability and ease of blending. Elemental sulfur, though smaller, is growing faster at a 6.7% CAGR as its higher analysis lowers freight costs and its controlled oxidation fits precision programs. Micronized and pastilled innovations shorten oxidation lag, extending applicability to short-season crops. Split-application strategies combine sulfate for early growth and elemental sulfur for sustained release, underscoring complementary rather than zero-sum demand within the sulfur fertilizers market. 

The elemental trend plays into the wider adoption of variable-rate applicators and remote-sensing maps, which rely on higher nutrient density to limit field passes. As sulfur-coated urea and sulfur-bentonite enter mainstream blends, producers that can guarantee uniform particle size and predictable oxidation stand to gain share.

Sulfur Fertilizer Market: Market Share by Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Form: Solid Foundation with Liquid Innovation

Solid products retained a 70% share in 2024, backed by efficient storage and compatibility with conventional spreaders across broad acres. Granulated and prilled formats dominate cooperative blending plants where throughput and shelf life matter. Yet liquid sulfur is advancing at a 7.2% CAGR on the strength of fertigation and foliar programs in high-value horticulture. 

Ammonium thiosulfate (12-0-0-26S) typifies liquid momentum, allowing tank mixing with nitrogen solutions and pesticides for single-pass efficiency. Growers appreciate the uniformity in micro-irrigation as well as quicker plant uptake during critical reproductive stages. Vendors are building regional terminals to shorten hauls, which should reduce delivered cost gaps versus solids and widen addressable acreage across the sulfur fertilizers market.

By Mode of Application: Soil Application Leads Precision Revolution

Soil incorporation generated 60% of 2024 demand because it treats underlying deficits and synchronizes with common tillage passes. Broadcasting remains king in cereal systems, although strip-till and banding rise where equipment fleets support precise placement. Fertigation captures a quarter of use, reflecting drip-line expansion in arid zones. 

Controlled-release granules are the fastest-growing application approach, climbing at 8.0% CAGR as polymer coatings modulate nutrient loss and extend feeding windows. GPS-guided spreaders layer sulfur at variable rates tied to remote-sensed biomass indices, cutting overlaps, and runoff. Integrated decision-support tools further reinforce the efficiency case, deepening penetration within the sulfur fertilizers market.

By Distribution Channel: Retail Networks Navigate Digital Disruption

Traditional retail dealers held a 45% share in 2024 through agronomic advice and local inventory. Direct-to-farm bulk contracts serve the largest growers and secure a 30% share. Cooperatives maintained 20% on the strength of member rebates and regional storage. 

E-commerce, although just 5% today, is the fastest-growing route at 9.1% CAGR, as online platforms bring transparent pricing and integrated logistics. Digital storefronts increasingly tie into soil-test databases and weather feeds to recommend tailored sulfur blends, a feature likely to accelerate product turnover and expand the sulfur fertilizers market size for specialized formulations.

Sulfur Fertilizer Market: Market Share by Distribution Channel
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Crop Type: Oilseeds Drive Protein Agriculture

Oilseeds and pulses absorbed 40% of the worldwide sulfur tonnage in 2024 because sulfur underpins oil quality and protein synthesis. Canola responds visibly to sulfur top-dress, with yield lifts averaging 8-15% where deficiencies emerge. Wheat, rice, and maize still represent considerable volume, but cereals’ growth pace lags as acreage stabilizes in many bread-basket regions. 

Fruits and vegetables, the fastest-expanding crop segment at 6.7% CAGR, profit from sulfur’s role in flavor compounds, shelf life, and antioxidant profiles. Specialty growers are quick adopters of foliar sulfur and drip-injection routines, aided by premium returns that justify higher per-acre inputs. Turf and ornamentals remain steady niche outlets within the sulfur fertilizers industry, where sulfur assists in color, density, and pH correction.

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific led the sulfur fertilizers market with a 37% share in 2024. China’s fertilizer intensity remains above global norms, and efforts to curb excess nitrogen spur the adop­tion of balanced NPK-S regimens that sustain yields while reducing losses. India’s shift toward precision spreaders and state subsidies for soil health cards pushes sulfur deeper into standard practice. Southeast Asian nations are raising demand through palm oil estates and double-cropped rice, whereas developed economies such as Japan seek ultra-low chloride options for high-value produce. Regional growth of 5.6% CAGR through 2030 is anchored by policy alignment with climate-smart agriculture goals.

Africa is the fastest-growing region at 6.4% CAGR. Soil surveys indicate sulfur scarcity in many sub-Saharan zones, and governments now couple fertilizer subsidies with extension services that promote balanced nutrition. Ethiopia’s domestic complex under construction post-GERD will cut import reliance, while South Africa’s commercial farms already leverage elemental sulfur blends to manage alkaline soils. Distribution challenges persist, yet donor-backed corridor projects and private blending hubs aim to improve last-mile reach, brightening prospects for the sulfur fertilizers market. 

North America posts a steady 4.1% CAGR as the United States channels 8.2 million metric tons of recovered sulfur each year from refineries into phosphate and ammonium sulfate production. Recent tariffs on Canadian sulfur inject short-term tightness, but abundant domestic gas and refinery networks anchor supply. Precision agronomy, cover-crop adoption, and sustainability certifications fuel incremental demand. Europe, at 3.2% CAGR, balances stringent water-quality directives with the need to uphold crop protein levels, making controlled-release sulfur variants attractive.

Sulfur Fertilizer Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

The sulfur fertilizers market is moderately concentrated, with the top five suppliers capturing 51% of 2024 revenue. Nutrien leads at 14%, leveraging integrated potash, nitrogen, and sulfur assets together with the world’s largest agricultural retail chain. Yara International follows at 12% through its sulfuric-acid backbone and specialty fertilizer branding. Mosaic commands 10%, supported by captive sulfur in its phosphate complexes.

Corporate strategy pivots on sustainability and digital agronomy. Low-carbon ammonia pilots and Yara’s Green Fertilizer roadmap address buyers seeking reduced scope-three emissions. Controlled-release launches are common, with Tiger-Sul expanding sulfur-bentonite capacity and Tessenderlo Kerley scaling liquid thiosulfates. 

Supply resilience efforts are equally prominent. CF Industries inked a low-carbon ammonia joint venture slated for 2029 start-up, securing feedstock optionality. K plus S raised USD 540 million in five-year notes during 2024 to fund South America expansion. CHS invested in river-terminal throughput to de-bottleneck Mississippi flows, reminding us that logistics, as much as chemistry, shapes a competitive edge in the sulfur fertilizers market.

Sulfur Fertilizer Industry Leaders

  1. Nutrien Ltd.

  2. Yara International ASA

  3. The Mosaic Company

  4. CF Industries Holdings Inc.

  5. K+S AG

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Sulfur Fertilizer Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Recent Industry Developments

  • May 2025: CF Industries entered a joint venture to construct a 1.4 million metric tons low-carbon ammonia and sulfur fertilizer complex in Louisiana, with commercial operations targeted for 2029.
  • March 2025: Ecovyst Inc. signed an agreement to acquire Cornerstone Chemical Company’s sulfuric-acid plant in Waggaman, Louisiana, expanding its virgin sulfuric-acid production capacity in North America.
  • January 2025: CHS Inc. secured an exclusive services deal with Ingram Barge Company for the Municipal River Terminal in St. Louis, adding regional throughput for granular and liquid sulfur fertilizers during peak shipping windows.
  • September 2024: Haifa Group and Deepak Fertilizers signed a long-term collaboration to scale advanced sulfur-containing plant-nutrition solutions across India and build localized blending capability.

Table of Contents for Sulfur Fertilizer Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Sulfur deficiency in soil
    • 4.2.2 Rising oilseed acreage and yields
    • 4.2.3 Government incentives for sustainable agriculture
    • 4.2.4 Adoption of controlled-release sulfur-coated urea
    • 4.2.5 Increasing availability of recovered sulfur from desulfurization units
    • 4.2.6 AI-based precision nutrient application platforms
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Competition from multi-nutrient specialty fertilizers
    • 4.3.2 Volatility in elemental sulfur feedstock prices
    • 4.3.3 Environmental risk of sulfate leaching into groundwater
    • 4.3.4 Distribution bottlenecks for prilled elemental sulfur in emerging markets
  • 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.5 Technological Outlook
  • 4.6 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.6.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.6.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitute Products
    • 4.6.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

  • 5.1 By Type
    • 5.1.1 Sulfate Fertilizers
    • 5.1.1.1 Ammonium Sulfate
    • 5.1.1.2 Potassium Sulfate
    • 5.1.1.3 Calcium Sulfate (Gypsum)
    • 5.1.1.4 Single Superphosphate
    • 5.1.2 Elemental Sulfur
    • 5.1.2.1 Micronized Sulfur
    • 5.1.2.2 Prilled/Pastilled Sulfur
    • 5.1.3 Sulfate of Micronutrients
    • 5.1.3.1 Zinc Sulfate
    • 5.1.3.2 Magnesium Sulfate
    • 5.1.3.3 Others
    • 5.1.4 Others (Sulfur-coated Urea, Sulfur Bentonite)
  • 5.2 By Form
    • 5.2.1 Solid
    • 5.2.2 Liquid
  • 5.3 By Mode of Application
    • 5.3.1 Soil Application
    • 5.3.2 Fertigation
    • 5.3.3 Foliar Spray
    • 5.3.4 Controlled-Release/Coated Granules
  • 5.4 By Crop Type
    • 5.4.1 Cereals and Grains
    • 5.4.2 Oilseeds and Pulses
    • 5.4.3 Fruits and Vegetables
    • 5.4.4 Turf and Ornamentals
    • 5.4.5 Others
  • 5.5 By Distribution Channel
    • 5.5.1 Direct-to-Farm
    • 5.5.2 Retail Dealers
    • 5.5.3 Cooperatives
    • 5.5.4 Online Platforms
  • 5.6 By Geography
    • 5.6.1 North America
    • 5.6.1.1 United States
    • 5.6.1.2 Canada
    • 5.6.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.6.1.4 Rest of North America
    • 5.6.2 Europe
    • 5.6.2.1 Germany
    • 5.6.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.6.2.3 France
    • 5.6.2.4 Russia
    • 5.6.2.5 Spain
    • 5.6.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.6.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.3.1 China
    • 5.6.3.2 Japan
    • 5.6.3.3 India
    • 5.6.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.6.3.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.4 South America
    • 5.6.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.6.4.2 Argentina
    • 5.6.4.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.6.5 Middle East
    • 5.6.5.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.6.5.2 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.6.5.3 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.6.6 Africa
    • 5.6.6.1 South Africa
    • 5.6.6.2 Egypt
    • 5.6.6.3 Rest of Africa

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Nutrien Ltd.
    • 6.4.2 Yara International ASA
    • 6.4.3 The Mosaic Company
    • 6.4.4 K+S AG
    • 6.4.5 Israel Chemicals Ltd.
    • 6.4.6 Haifa Chemicals Ltd.
    • 6.4.7 Nufarm Limited
    • 6.4.8 Koch Industries Inc.
    • 6.4.9 CF Industries Holdings Inc.
    • 6.4.10 OCP S.A.
    • 6.4.11 BASF SE
    • 6.4.12 Sinochem Holdings Corp. Ltd.
    • 6.4.13 Saudi Arabian Fertilizer Company (SAFCO) (Saudi Basic Industries Corporation (SABIC))
    • 6.4.14 Tiger-Sul Products LLC (Tessenderlo Group)
    • 6.4.15 TogliattiAzot PJSC (Uralchem Group)

7. Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the sulfur fertilizer market as the value of all straight and specialty fertilizers in which sulfur is the primary nutrient supplied to field, horticultural, turf, and plantation crops. Covered products span sulfate salts, elemental sulfur prills or pastilles, thiosulfates, and polymer-sulfur coated grades sold in dry or liquid form for soil, foliar, or fertigation use.

Scope exclusion: Inputs where sulfur is consumed only as a process reagent (e.g., sulfuric acid in phosphate plants) or delivered incidentally within compound NPK blends are outside this market.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Type
    • Sulfate Fertilizers
      • Ammonium Sulfate
      • Potassium Sulfate
      • Calcium Sulfate (Gypsum)
      • Single Superphosphate
    • Elemental Sulfur
      • Micronized Sulfur
      • Prilled/Pastilled Sulfur
    • Sulfate of Micronutrients
      • Zinc Sulfate
      • Magnesium Sulfate
      • Others
    • Others (Sulfur-coated Urea, Sulfur Bentonite)
  • By Form
    • Solid
    • Liquid
  • By Mode of Application
    • Soil Application
    • Fertigation
    • Foliar Spray
    • Controlled-Release/Coated Granules
  • By Crop Type
    • Cereals and Grains
    • Oilseeds and Pulses
    • Fruits and Vegetables
    • Turf and Ornamentals
    • Others
  • By Distribution Channel
    • Direct-to-Farm
    • Retail Dealers
    • Cooperatives
    • Online Platforms
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
      • Rest of North America
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Russia
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Middle East
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
      • South Africa
      • Egypt
      • Rest of Africa

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Structured calls with agronomists, regional distributors, and procurement heads across Asia-Pacific, the Americas, and Europe validated typical farm-gate pricing spreads, sulfur deficiency hotspots, and likely shifts toward controlled-release coatings. Feedback on future subsidy regimes and crop rotation plans refined scenario inputs that would be invisible in the public domain.

Desk Research

Analysts first collated supply-demand baselines from tier-1 public resources such as FAOSTAT crop acreage files, UN Comtrade shipment records for key HS codes 2503 and 3102, International Fertilizer Association application rate surveys, and World Bank sulfur price indices. National soil nutrient balance reports published by USDA ERS and Eurostat, along with patent abstracts sourced through Questel, helped us map technological adoption patterns. Company 10-Ks and investor decks provided selling price and capacity hints that anchored revenue estimates. The sources cited above illustrate, not exhaust, the library consulted.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down reconstruction begins with apparent consumption derived from production plus net trade of sulfur-based fertilizers, which is then valued using weighted average selling prices gathered from channel checks. Selective bottom-up roll-ups of manufacturer sales and sampled ASP × volume for elemental sulfur prills provide a cross-check and adjustment layer. Key model drivers include regional sulfur application rates (kg/ha), acreage under oilseeds and pulses, benchmark elemental sulfur prices, refinery sulfur recovery output, and government micronutrient subsidy budgets. Forecasts employ multivariate regression where demand growth is linked to crop acreage expansion, price elasticity, and soil deficiency trends, while price paths are smoothed through ARIMA to temper short-run volatility. Any data gap at the sub-regional level is bridged using price-normalized import volumes and historical variation bands reviewed with respondents.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs pass a three-stage review: peer analyst check, senior domain lead assessment, and automated variance scans against external trade and acreage data. Models are refreshed each year, with interim revisions if refinery outages, major subsidy shifts, or price shocks exceed predefined thresholds.

Why Our Sulfur Fertilizers Baseline Commands Reliability

Published estimates often diverge because firms pick different nutrient scopes, price assumptions, and refresh cadences.

Key gap drivers include: some publishers remove liquid thiosulfate streams, others convert at producer-level ex-plant prices rather than farm-gate, while a few extrapolate demand using fixed crop acreage multipliers that ignore rising sulfur application rates in high-yield cereals. Mordor's definition, price triangulation, and annual update rhythm minimize such drifts.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 5.10 bn (2025) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 4.79 bn (2024) Global Consultancy A Excludes elemental sulfur liquids; uses 2022 price deck
USD 4.87 bn (2025) Trade Journal B Relies on static 3 kg/ha global rate; limited primary validation
USD 4.70 bn (2024) Industry Data Vendor C Counts only sulfate salts; updates every three years

The comparison shows that once liquid products, updated price curves, and evolving application norms are captured, Mordor's balanced baseline aligns more closely with on-ground realities, offering decision-makers a dependable reference.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current value of the sulfur fertilizers market?

The sulfur fertilizers market reached USD 5.1 billion in 2025.

Which region leads to global demand?

Asia-Pacific holds the largest share at 37% of sales thanks to intensive agriculture in China and India.

Why are elemental sulfur products growing faster than sulfates?

Elemental sulfur offers high nutrient concentration, lower freight cost per unit, and controlled-release properties that fit precision farming.

How do refinery operations influence sulfur fertilizer supply?

Refineries recover more than 60% of elemental sulfur. Shifts in crude throughput or margins directly affect fertilizer feedstock availability.

What technology trends are reshaping sulfur fertilizer use?

Controlled-release coatings and AI-guided precision platforms improve nutrient efficiency and lower environmental losses.

How consolidated is the supplier base?

The top five companies account for 51% of global volume, reflecting moderate concentration with room for regional and niche competitors.

Page last updated on:

Sulfur Fertilizer Report Snapshots