Sulfur Fertilizer Market Size and Share
Sulfur Fertilizer Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The sulfur fertilizers market reached USD 5.1 billion in 2025 and is projected to climb to USD 6.5 billion by 2030, advancing at a 4.9% CAGR during the forecast period. Gains stem from the sharp decline in atmospheric sulfur deposition, which has fallen more than 70% since the 1990s, leaving soils depleted and crops increasingly responsive to applied sulfur. The Asia-Pacific region leads consumption on the back of China’s 48.9 million metric tons annual fertilizer use and India’s expanding precision fertilization programs. Africa represents the fastest-growing regional opportunity as infrastructure upgrades and food-security initiatives accelerate balanced nutrient adoption. Industry momentum is further supported by refinery desulfurization streams that now provide more than 60% of all elemental sulfur used in fertilizer manufacturing, although supply can tighten whenever refining margins compress.
Key Report Takeaways
- By type, sulfate fertilizers led with 51% of the sulfur fertilizers market share in 2024, while elemental sulfur is projected to grow at a 6.7% CAGR through 2030.
- By form, solid products accounted for 70% of the sulfur fertilizers market share in 2024, whereas liquid formulations are advancing at a 7.2% CAGR to 2030.
- By mode of application, soil application captured 60% of the sulfur fertilizers market size in 2024, while controlled release and coated granules represent the fastest track at an 8.0% CAGR through 2030.
- By crop, oilseeds and pulses held 40% of the sulfur fertilizers market share in 2024, while fruits and vegetables are forecast to expand at a 6.7% CAGR to 2030.
- By distribution channel, retail dealers secured 45% of global revenue in 2024, and online platforms are set to grow at a 9.1% CAGR through 2030.
- By geography, Asia-Pacific dominated with a 37% share in 2024, and Africa is anticipated to record the fastest growth at a 6.4% CAGR to 2030.
- The top five suppliers controlled 51% of global revenue in 2024, with Nutrien leading at 14% followed by Yara International at 12% and Mosaic at 10%.
Global Sulfur Fertilizer Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sulfur deficiency in soil | +1.2% | Asia-Pacific and North America | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Rising oilseed acreage and yields | +0.9% | North America, South America, Asia-Pacific | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Government incentives for sustainable agriculture | +0.7% | Europe and Asia-Pacific, with spill-over to Africa and South America | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Adoption of controlled-release sulfur-coated urea | +0.6% | North America and Europe, expanding into Asia-Pacific | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Availability of recovered sulfur from desulfurization units | +0.4% | Middle East and North America | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| AI-based precision nutrient platforms | +0.3% | North America and Europe, early uptake in Asia-Pacific | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Sulfur Deficiency in Soil
Soil tests indicate sulfur levels have fallen 30-50% during the past three decades as air-quality rules removed sulfate aerosols, making sulfur the fourth most yield-limiting nutrient after nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Crops that receive 30-45 kilograms of sulfur per hectare show wheat yield gains of 15-25% together with higher grain protein. Intensively cropped regions with low organic matter are the most vulnerable, and site-specific test kits now allow farmers to map deficiencies before the season begins. This capability is a primary engine for the sulfur fertilizers market because it converts latent nutrient shortages into measurable demand. Yield monitors on commercial corn farms now record site yield drops of up to 18% when leaf sulfur falls below 0.2%, underscoring the economic stakes for large operations. As climate patterns shift rainfall distribution, leaching losses further lower residual sulfur, making annual supplementation a practical necessity.
Rising Oilseed Acreage and Yields
Oilseed crops such as canola and soybean require two to three times more sulfur per unit of nitrogen than cereals, which intensifies fertilizer demand as the global planted area expands. University field trials in Missouri report 8.1 bushel-per-acre soybean gains from 100 pounds of ammonium sulfate, yielding a USD 80 per-acre profit lift after input costs. The economics encourage continued adoption even in mature markets, reinforcing a stable pull-through on sulfur volumes. Global canola acreage is projected to expand by 1.8 million hectares by 2030, amplifying demand for high-sulfur blends in Canada and Australia. Biotech cultivars with higher protein ceilings also pull more sulfur, linking seed genetics directly to fertilizer strategy.
Government Incentives for Sustainable Agriculture
Public programs increasingly tie funding to balanced nutrient plans that include sulfur. For example, the USDA committed USD 517 million to expand domestic fertilizer capacity in 2025, explicitly citing the need for sulfur-enhanced blends.[1]Source: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, “Sulfate Groundwater Concerns,” epa.gov Europe’s Fertilizer Products Regulation requires full nutrient disclosure, pushing producers toward formulations that show superior use efficiency. Asia-Pacific governments, especially China, are steering subsidies to precision placement tools that optimize sulfur timing, deepening demand in the region. Indonesia granted value-added tax exemptions on sulfur-enhanced fertilizers starting in 2025, lowering farm-gate prices and accelerating adoption. Such policies reinforce a feedback loop where regulatory focus on nutrient efficiency translates into higher market penetration for sulfur-based solutions.
Adoption of Controlled-Release Sulfur-Coated Urea
Sulfur-coated urea improves nitrogen efficiency by 26% compared with uncoated urea while supplying a slow-release stream of plant-available sulfur[2]Source: Technical Bulletin, “Controlled-Release Coatings Improve Urea Efficiency,” acs.org . Farmers gain from fewer passes, lower volatilization, and steadier nutrient curves, aligning with precision-agriculture objectives. Manufacturing advances have lowered coating costs and enhanced durability, helping controlled-release products gain shelf space in both premium and broad-acre channels. University trials in Texas cotton fields show a 9% lint yield lift when sulfur-coated urea is replaced with straight urea during side-dress. Retailers report that year-over-year sales of coated grades rose 14% in 2024, signaling broad acceptance beyond niche users.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Competition from multi-nutrient specialty fertilizers | −0.8% | North America and Europe | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Volatility in elemental sulfur prices | −0.6% | Import-dependent markets worldwide | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Environmental risk of sulfate leaching into groundwater | −0.4% | Europe and North America, growing in Asia-Pacific | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Distribution bottlenecks for prilled elemental sulfur in emerging markets | −0.3% | Africa and parts of Asia-Pacific | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Competition from Multi-Nutrient Specialty Fertilizers
Farmers increasingly favor single-pass blends that address multiple deficiencies, which can dilute standalone demand for sulfur. Suppliers are responding by embedding sulfur into broader nutrient packages, but pricing competition and formulation complexity raise barriers for smaller producers. Large distributors bundle mix and match micronutrient packs that include sulfur at lower incremental cost, eroding standalone sales. To stay relevant, sulfur fertilizer suppliers are exploring co-marketing alliances that offer turnkey crop nutrition programs. Such shifts could compress standalone sulfur margins and push consolidation among smaller players.
Volatility in Elemental Sulfur Prices
Contract sulfur traded between USD 69 and USD 116 per metric ton during 2024, and new 25% tariffs on Canadian shipments to the United States effective February 2025 add further unpredictability. Price swings erode budgeting confidence for growers and manufacturers alike, tempering near-term procurement. Forward contracts help insulate manufacturers, but farmers often purchase closer to application season and feel the brunt of price spikes. Volatility also complicates capital planning for new sulfur-beneficiation plants, delaying investments that could stabilize the supply chain. Ultimately, unpredictable input costs ripple down to retail prices, affecting growers' budget allocations for the sulfur fertilizers market.
Segment Analysis
By Type: Sulfate Dominance Faces Elemental Challenge
In 2024, sulfate fertilizers such as ammonium sulfate, potassium sulfate, and single superphosphate delivered 51% of global revenue, reflecting their immediate plant availability and ease of blending. Elemental sulfur, though smaller, is growing faster at a 6.7% CAGR as its higher analysis lowers freight costs and its controlled oxidation fits precision programs. Micronized and pastilled innovations shorten oxidation lag, extending applicability to short-season crops. Split-application strategies combine sulfate for early growth and elemental sulfur for sustained release, underscoring complementary rather than zero-sum demand within the sulfur fertilizers market.
The elemental trend plays into the wider adoption of variable-rate applicators and remote-sensing maps, which rely on higher nutrient density to limit field passes. As sulfur-coated urea and sulfur-bentonite enter mainstream blends, producers that can guarantee uniform particle size and predictable oxidation stand to gain share.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Form: Solid Foundation with Liquid Innovation
Solid products retained a 70% share in 2024, backed by efficient storage and compatibility with conventional spreaders across broad acres. Granulated and prilled formats dominate cooperative blending plants where throughput and shelf life matter. Yet liquid sulfur is advancing at a 7.2% CAGR on the strength of fertigation and foliar programs in high-value horticulture.
Ammonium thiosulfate (12-0-0-26S) typifies liquid momentum, allowing tank mixing with nitrogen solutions and pesticides for single-pass efficiency. Growers appreciate the uniformity in micro-irrigation as well as quicker plant uptake during critical reproductive stages. Vendors are building regional terminals to shorten hauls, which should reduce delivered cost gaps versus solids and widen addressable acreage across the sulfur fertilizers market.
By Mode of Application: Soil Application Leads Precision Revolution
Soil incorporation generated 60% of 2024 demand because it treats underlying deficits and synchronizes with common tillage passes. Broadcasting remains king in cereal systems, although strip-till and banding rise where equipment fleets support precise placement. Fertigation captures a quarter of use, reflecting drip-line expansion in arid zones.
Controlled-release granules are the fastest-growing application approach, climbing at 8.0% CAGR as polymer coatings modulate nutrient loss and extend feeding windows. GPS-guided spreaders layer sulfur at variable rates tied to remote-sensed biomass indices, cutting overlaps, and runoff. Integrated decision-support tools further reinforce the efficiency case, deepening penetration within the sulfur fertilizers market.
By Distribution Channel: Retail Networks Navigate Digital Disruption
Traditional retail dealers held a 45% share in 2024 through agronomic advice and local inventory. Direct-to-farm bulk contracts serve the largest growers and secure a 30% share. Cooperatives maintained 20% on the strength of member rebates and regional storage.
E-commerce, although just 5% today, is the fastest-growing route at 9.1% CAGR, as online platforms bring transparent pricing and integrated logistics. Digital storefronts increasingly tie into soil-test databases and weather feeds to recommend tailored sulfur blends, a feature likely to accelerate product turnover and expand the sulfur fertilizers market size for specialized formulations.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Crop Type: Oilseeds Drive Protein Agriculture
Oilseeds and pulses absorbed 40% of the worldwide sulfur tonnage in 2024 because sulfur underpins oil quality and protein synthesis. Canola responds visibly to sulfur top-dress, with yield lifts averaging 8-15% where deficiencies emerge. Wheat, rice, and maize still represent considerable volume, but cereals’ growth pace lags as acreage stabilizes in many bread-basket regions.
Fruits and vegetables, the fastest-expanding crop segment at 6.7% CAGR, profit from sulfur’s role in flavor compounds, shelf life, and antioxidant profiles. Specialty growers are quick adopters of foliar sulfur and drip-injection routines, aided by premium returns that justify higher per-acre inputs. Turf and ornamentals remain steady niche outlets within the sulfur fertilizers industry, where sulfur assists in color, density, and pH correction.
Geography Analysis
Asia-Pacific led the sulfur fertilizers market with a 37% share in 2024. China’s fertilizer intensity remains above global norms, and efforts to curb excess nitrogen spur the adoption of balanced NPK-S regimens that sustain yields while reducing losses. India’s shift toward precision spreaders and state subsidies for soil health cards pushes sulfur deeper into standard practice. Southeast Asian nations are raising demand through palm oil estates and double-cropped rice, whereas developed economies such as Japan seek ultra-low chloride options for high-value produce. Regional growth of 5.6% CAGR through 2030 is anchored by policy alignment with climate-smart agriculture goals.
Africa is the fastest-growing region at 6.4% CAGR. Soil surveys indicate sulfur scarcity in many sub-Saharan zones, and governments now couple fertilizer subsidies with extension services that promote balanced nutrition. Ethiopia’s domestic complex under construction post-GERD will cut import reliance, while South Africa’s commercial farms already leverage elemental sulfur blends to manage alkaline soils. Distribution challenges persist, yet donor-backed corridor projects and private blending hubs aim to improve last-mile reach, brightening prospects for the sulfur fertilizers market.
North America posts a steady 4.1% CAGR as the United States channels 8.2 million metric tons of recovered sulfur each year from refineries into phosphate and ammonium sulfate production. Recent tariffs on Canadian sulfur inject short-term tightness, but abundant domestic gas and refinery networks anchor supply. Precision agronomy, cover-crop adoption, and sustainability certifications fuel incremental demand. Europe, at 3.2% CAGR, balances stringent water-quality directives with the need to uphold crop protein levels, making controlled-release sulfur variants attractive.
Competitive Landscape
The sulfur fertilizers market is moderately concentrated, with the top five suppliers capturing 51% of 2024 revenue. Nutrien leads at 14%, leveraging integrated potash, nitrogen, and sulfur assets together with the world’s largest agricultural retail chain. Yara International follows at 12% through its sulfuric-acid backbone and specialty fertilizer branding. Mosaic commands 10%, supported by captive sulfur in its phosphate complexes.
Corporate strategy pivots on sustainability and digital agronomy. Low-carbon ammonia pilots and Yara’s Green Fertilizer roadmap address buyers seeking reduced scope-three emissions. Controlled-release launches are common, with Tiger-Sul expanding sulfur-bentonite capacity and Tessenderlo Kerley scaling liquid thiosulfates.
Supply resilience efforts are equally prominent. CF Industries inked a low-carbon ammonia joint venture slated for 2029 start-up, securing feedstock optionality. K plus S raised USD 540 million in five-year notes during 2024 to fund South America expansion. CHS invested in river-terminal throughput to de-bottleneck Mississippi flows, reminding us that logistics, as much as chemistry, shapes a competitive edge in the sulfur fertilizers market.
Sulfur Fertilizer Industry Leaders
-
Nutrien Ltd.
-
Yara International ASA
-
The Mosaic Company
-
CF Industries Holdings Inc.
-
K+S AG
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- May 2025: CF Industries entered a joint venture to construct a 1.4 million metric tons low-carbon ammonia and sulfur fertilizer complex in Louisiana, with commercial operations targeted for 2029.
- March 2025: Ecovyst Inc. signed an agreement to acquire Cornerstone Chemical Company’s sulfuric-acid plant in Waggaman, Louisiana, expanding its virgin sulfuric-acid production capacity in North America.
- January 2025: CHS Inc. secured an exclusive services deal with Ingram Barge Company for the Municipal River Terminal in St. Louis, adding regional throughput for granular and liquid sulfur fertilizers during peak shipping windows.
- September 2024: Haifa Group and Deepak Fertilizers signed a long-term collaboration to scale advanced sulfur-containing plant-nutrition solutions across India and build localized blending capability.
Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope
Market Definitions and Key Coverage
Our study defines the sulfur fertilizer market as the value of all straight and specialty fertilizers in which sulfur is the primary nutrient supplied to field, horticultural, turf, and plantation crops. Covered products span sulfate salts, elemental sulfur prills or pastilles, thiosulfates, and polymer-sulfur coated grades sold in dry or liquid form for soil, foliar, or fertigation use.
Scope exclusion: Inputs where sulfur is consumed only as a process reagent (e.g., sulfuric acid in phosphate plants) or delivered incidentally within compound NPK blends are outside this market.
Segmentation Overview
- By Type
- Sulfate Fertilizers
- Ammonium Sulfate
- Potassium Sulfate
- Calcium Sulfate (Gypsum)
- Single Superphosphate
- Elemental Sulfur
- Micronized Sulfur
- Prilled/Pastilled Sulfur
- Sulfate of Micronutrients
- Zinc Sulfate
- Magnesium Sulfate
- Others
- Others (Sulfur-coated Urea, Sulfur Bentonite)
- Sulfate Fertilizers
- By Form
- Solid
- Liquid
- By Mode of Application
- Soil Application
- Fertigation
- Foliar Spray
- Controlled-Release/Coated Granules
- By Crop Type
- Cereals and Grains
- Oilseeds and Pulses
- Fruits and Vegetables
- Turf and Ornamentals
- Others
- By Distribution Channel
- Direct-to-Farm
- Retail Dealers
- Cooperatives
- Online Platforms
- By Geography
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Mexico
- Rest of North America
- Europe
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- France
- Russia
- Spain
- Rest of Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- China
- Japan
- India
- South Korea
- Rest of Asia-Pacific
- South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of South America
- Middle East
- Saudi Arabia
- United Arab Emirates
- Rest of Middle East
- Africa
- South Africa
- Egypt
- Rest of Africa
- North America
Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation
Primary Research
Structured calls with agronomists, regional distributors, and procurement heads across Asia-Pacific, the Americas, and Europe validated typical farm-gate pricing spreads, sulfur deficiency hotspots, and likely shifts toward controlled-release coatings. Feedback on future subsidy regimes and crop rotation plans refined scenario inputs that would be invisible in the public domain.
Desk Research
Analysts first collated supply-demand baselines from tier-1 public resources such as FAOSTAT crop acreage files, UN Comtrade shipment records for key HS codes 2503 and 3102, International Fertilizer Association application rate surveys, and World Bank sulfur price indices. National soil nutrient balance reports published by USDA ERS and Eurostat, along with patent abstracts sourced through Questel, helped us map technological adoption patterns. Company 10-Ks and investor decks provided selling price and capacity hints that anchored revenue estimates. The sources cited above illustrate, not exhaust, the library consulted.
Market-Sizing & Forecasting
A top-down reconstruction begins with apparent consumption derived from production plus net trade of sulfur-based fertilizers, which is then valued using weighted average selling prices gathered from channel checks. Selective bottom-up roll-ups of manufacturer sales and sampled ASP × volume for elemental sulfur prills provide a cross-check and adjustment layer. Key model drivers include regional sulfur application rates (kg/ha), acreage under oilseeds and pulses, benchmark elemental sulfur prices, refinery sulfur recovery output, and government micronutrient subsidy budgets. Forecasts employ multivariate regression where demand growth is linked to crop acreage expansion, price elasticity, and soil deficiency trends, while price paths are smoothed through ARIMA to temper short-run volatility. Any data gap at the sub-regional level is bridged using price-normalized import volumes and historical variation bands reviewed with respondents.
Data Validation & Update Cycle
Outputs pass a three-stage review: peer analyst check, senior domain lead assessment, and automated variance scans against external trade and acreage data. Models are refreshed each year, with interim revisions if refinery outages, major subsidy shifts, or price shocks exceed predefined thresholds.
Why Our Sulfur Fertilizers Baseline Commands Reliability
Published estimates often diverge because firms pick different nutrient scopes, price assumptions, and refresh cadences.
Key gap drivers include: some publishers remove liquid thiosulfate streams, others convert at producer-level ex-plant prices rather than farm-gate, while a few extrapolate demand using fixed crop acreage multipliers that ignore rising sulfur application rates in high-yield cereals. Mordor's definition, price triangulation, and annual update rhythm minimize such drifts.
Benchmark comparison
| Market Size | Anonymized source | Primary gap driver |
|---|---|---|
| USD 5.10 bn (2025) | Mordor Intelligence | - |
| USD 4.79 bn (2024) | Global Consultancy A | Excludes elemental sulfur liquids; uses 2022 price deck |
| USD 4.87 bn (2025) | Trade Journal B | Relies on static 3 kg/ha global rate; limited primary validation |
| USD 4.70 bn (2024) | Industry Data Vendor C | Counts only sulfate salts; updates every three years |
The comparison shows that once liquid products, updated price curves, and evolving application norms are captured, Mordor's balanced baseline aligns more closely with on-ground realities, offering decision-makers a dependable reference.
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the current value of the sulfur fertilizers market?
The sulfur fertilizers market reached USD 5.1 billion in 2025.
Which region leads to global demand?
Asia-Pacific holds the largest share at 37% of sales thanks to intensive agriculture in China and India.
Why are elemental sulfur products growing faster than sulfates?
Elemental sulfur offers high nutrient concentration, lower freight cost per unit, and controlled-release properties that fit precision farming.
How do refinery operations influence sulfur fertilizer supply?
Refineries recover more than 60% of elemental sulfur. Shifts in crude throughput or margins directly affect fertilizer feedstock availability.
What technology trends are reshaping sulfur fertilizer use?
Controlled-release coatings and AI-guided precision platforms improve nutrient efficiency and lower environmental losses.
How consolidated is the supplier base?
The top five companies account for 51% of global volume, reflecting moderate concentration with room for regional and niche competitors.
Page last updated on: