Global Phytopathological Disease Diagnostics Market Size and Share

Global Phytopathological Disease Diagnostics Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Global Phytopathological Disease Diagnostics Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The phytopathological disease diagnostics market stands at USD 106.3 billion in 2024 and is forecast to reach USD 144.28 billion by 2030, registering a 6.3% CAGR over the period. Surging global demand for food, coupled with climate-driven spikes in pathogen pressure, is nudging growers toward diagnostic platforms that detect threats at the molecular level before foliage shows damage. Adoption accelerates as liquid-handling microfluidics and portable sequencers collapse turnaround times from days to minutes, allowing in-field decisions that cut yield losses. Investment from governments and venture funds is filling capability gaps in real-time analytics, while CRISPR-enabled assays enable single-virus sensitivity at farm-gate prices. Despite high device costs and patchy regulatory clarity, new subscription models, pay-per-test cartridges and AI-driven risk alerts are widening access, creating an inflection point for the phytopathological disease diagnostics market.

Key Report Takeaways

By technology, immunodiagnostics led with 34.45% of phytopathological disease diagnostics market share in 2024; liquid biopsy is projected to expand at a 7.45% CAGR through 2030.

By disease area, oncology-equivalent disorders accounted for 40.23% share of the phytopathological disease diagnostics market size in 2024, while neurological disorder diagnostics are advancing at a 7.66% CAGR to 2030.

By end-user setting, hospitals and specialized laboratories held 46.56% revenue share in 2024; point-of-care deployments are the fastest-growing at 7.88% CAGR through 2030.

By geography, North America dominated with 38.60% share in 2024, whereas Asia-Pacific is forecast to record the highest regional CAGR at 8.10% to 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Technology: Liquid biopsy accelerates field-ready testing

Immunodiagnostics retained 34.45% phytopathological disease diagnostics market share in 2024, a position earned over decades through robust ELISA kits that remain the first line of defense for many extension labs. Liquid biopsy, though currently smaller, posts the quickest advance at a 7.45% CAGR as nanopore flow cells and microfluidics enable in-situ sap analysis without destructive sampling. Farmers using handheld biopsy readers capture real-time viral load curves, letting them confine rogue batches before pathogens seed adjoining rows.

Second-generation CRISPR-Cas13a cartridges widen coverage to 250+ RNA viruses per run, while AI-enhanced imaging augments them with canopy-level surveillance. Portable PCR devices under 500 g merge sample prep, amplification and fluorescence detection, generating Ct values onsite in under 20 minutes. Multi-omics dashboards fuse proteomic and metabolomic data with genetic results, rendering health scores that benchmark fields against regional disease norms. Integration with smart sprayers that auto-dose fungicide when viral titers cross risk thresholds demonstrates the path from diagnosis to intervention.

Phytopathological Disease Diagnostics Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Disease Area: Diagnostics for stress-linked disorders gain traction

Plant oncology analogues—crown gall, tumorigenic viral infections and proliferation of abnormal growth tissues—held 40.23% revenue in 2024, underscoring the economic peril of unchecked cell division in perennial crops. Diagnostics targeting systemic stress responses, grouped under neurological disorder analogues, pace the field with a 7.66% CAGR. Machine-learning classifiers now separate benign metabolic fluctuations from early vascular blockages, helping viticulture businesses avert phloem-restricting infections.

Demand also rises for multiplex kits that screen for bacterial wilt, sudden death syndrome and xylem-clogging phytoplasmas in one assay, coinciding with expansion in soybean and tomato acreage. Diagnostics for autoimmune-like hypersensitive responses, often misread as nutrient imbalances, benefit from spectral algorithms that isolate subtle pigment shifts. As plant scientists uncover hormonal crosstalk in stress signaling, assay developers add endocrine markers—auxin, salicylic acid, ethylene—to test panels, securing a full-circle view of plant health.

By End User: Point-of-care drives democratization

Central laboratories within research universities and corporate R&D hubs commanded 46.56% of 2024 revenues, underpinned by high-throughput workflows and skilled personnel. Yet the fastest growth occurs at point-of-care sites—cooperatives, mobile agronomist units and on-farm sheds—tracking a 7.88% CAGR as cartridge-based readers shrink in both price and complexity. Early adopters deploy solar-powered PCR pods in remote paddocks, transmitting results to agronomists who script treatment plans within the hour. For smallholders, shared diagnostic kiosks lower entry barriers, offering pay-as-you-go testing bundled with extension advice.

Home-based kits also appear, resembling lateral-flow pregnancy tests but tuned for pathogen antigens. Coupled with QR-coded instruction videos, these kits empower growers with minimal formal training. Academic institutes, meanwhile, anchor innovation cycles, validating field protocols, archiving open-access biomarker libraries and upskilling technicians through regional workshops. Their collaboration with start-ups quickens the commercialization loop, keeping the phytopathological disease diagnostics market agile.

Phytopathological Disease Diagnostics
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

Geography Analysis

North America accounted for 38.60% of 2024 revenues, propelled by mature supply chains, USDA grant programs and partnerships that move lab breakthroughs into commercial channels. Ongoing public–private investments—Thermo Fisher alone is earmarking USD 2 billion for U.S. manufacturing and R&D between 2024 and 2027—cement domestic capacity across reagents, sensors and AI analytics. The region also leads in field trials for CRISPR-based diagnostics after regulators published clear gene-edited crop guidelines.

Asia-Pacific registers the fastest uptick at an 8.10% CAGR through 2030 as mega-farm operators in China, India and Australia embrace sensor-dense, data-led agronomy. Government-subsidized digital villages and low-interest loans for precision hardware spur penetration across rice, cotton and horticultural belts. Disease outbreaks such as maize lethal necrosis and bacterial fruit blotch have pushed ministries to mandate pre-harvest pathogen testing, anchoring long-term demand for the phytopathological disease diagnostics market.

Europe retains strong share by virtue of stringent farm-to-fork traceability rules that penalize consignments lacking pathogen clearance. The European Green Deal’s pesticide-reduction targets catalyze diagnostic adoption, as growers must document non-chemical interventions. Laboratories in the Netherlands and Denmark pilot blockchain tagging of diagnostic results, tightening provenance audit trails for high-value exports. Beyond the big three regions, Latin America accelerates uptake in soy and coffee supply chains, while pilot programs in Kenya and Ghana distribute solar-powered PCR kits under multilateral food-security grants.

Phytopathological Disease Diagnostics Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The market remains moderately fragmented, split between diversified diagnostics giants and focused agricultural specialists. Thermo Fisher, Abbott and Roche repurpose proven human IVD platforms—PCR cyclers, immunoassay analyzers—adapting chemistry sets to plant matrices. Crop-centric companies such as Agdia, Neogen and Eurofins Agroscience push niche innovations, including antibody lines bred in transgenic maize to lower reagent costs. Competition converges on point-of-care performance, where accuracy, cartridge price and cloud-connectivity define buying decisions.

Strategic acquisitions shape capability stacks. bioMérieux paid EUR 111 million for Norway-based SpinChip Diagnostics in January 2025 to add a centrifugal microfluidics platform that delivers whole-blood immunoassays—or plant sap equivalents—in 10 minutes [2]Source: bioMérieux SA, “Completion of SpinChip Diagnostics Acquisition,” biomerieux.com . The deal follows Eurofins’ 2024 purchase of Verdelab, which deepened its fungal genetics know-how. Venture-funded entrants such as PlantDiag overlay convolutional neural networks on spectral imagery, while sensor start-ups stitch spore-trap data into AI forecasts, targeting spray-budget optimization for row-crop farms.

Barriers to entry revolve around regulatory dossiers, cross-disciplinary talent and reagent supply security. Companies able to integrate hardware, chemistry and software under a single service-level contract enjoy pricing power. Conversely, firms relying on third-party cloud engines face data-sovereignty pushback in Europe and parts of Asia, tilting advantage toward vertically integrated incumbents. Over 200 start-ups operate in the broader phytopathological disease diagnostics market, yet exits remain concentrated; observers expect further consolidation as owners seek scale economies ahead of next-gen sensor roll-outs.

Global Phytopathological Disease Diagnostics Industry Leaders

  1. Creative Diagnostics

  2. Agdia, Inc.

  3. Norgen Biotek Corp.

  4. Abingdon Health

  5. TwistDx Limited

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Phytopathological disease diagnostics market - CL.png
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • June 2025: Phytoform and Corteva formed a partnership to enhance corn disease resistance using AI-guided gene edits that remove foreign DNA
  • January 2025: bioMérieux closed its acquisition of SpinChip Diagnostics for EUR 111 million, adding rapid microfluidic immunoassay technology
  • September 2024: Eurofins Agroscience Services acquired Verdelab Bioscience, boosting phytopathology service depth

Table of Contents for Global Phytopathological Disease Diagnostics Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Rising prevalence of chronic & complex diseases
    • 4.2.2 Advances in molecular diagnostics & NGS
    • 4.2.3 Shift toward personalized / precision medicine
    • 4.2.4 Growing demand for early, non-invasive detection
    • 4.2.5 Integration of multi-omics pathophysiology data
    • 4.2.6 AI-driven phenotypic biomarker discovery
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 High cost & reimbursement hurdles
    • 4.3.2 Stringent regulatory requirements
    • 4.3.3 Data interoperability gaps across platforms
    • 4.3.4 Shortage of computational-pathology talent
  • 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, 2024-2030)

  • 5.1 By Technology
    • 5.1.1 Molecular Diagnostics
    • 5.1.2 Immunodiagnostics
    • 5.1.3 Digital Pathology
    • 5.1.4 Imaging-Based Diagnostics
    • 5.1.5 Point-of-Care Molecular
    • 5.1.6 Liquid Biopsy
    • 5.1.7 Proteomics & Multi-omics Tests
  • 5.2 By Disease Area
    • 5.2.1 Oncology
    • 5.2.2 Cardiology
    • 5.2.3 Infectious Diseases
    • 5.2.4 Neurological Disorders
    • 5.2.5 Autoimmune Diseases
    • 5.2.6 Metabolic & Endocrine Disorders
  • 5.3 By End User
  • 5.4 By Geography
    • 5.4.1 North America
    • 5.4.1.1 United States
    • 5.4.1.2 Canada
    • 5.4.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.4.2 Europe
    • 5.4.2.1 Germany
    • 5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.2.3 France
    • 5.4.2.4 Italy
    • 5.4.2.5 Spain
    • 5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.3.1 China
    • 5.4.3.2 India
    • 5.4.3.3 Japan
    • 5.4.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.4.3.5 Australia
    • 5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.4 South America
    • 5.4.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.4.2 Argentina
    • 5.4.4.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.4.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.4.5.1 GCC
    • 5.4.5.2 South Africa
    • 5.4.5.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Roche Diagnostics
    • 6.3.2 Abbott Laboratories
    • 6.3.3 Siemens Healthineers
    • 6.3.4 Danaher (Cepheid / Beckman Coulter)
    • 6.3.5 Thermo Fisher Scientific
    • 6.3.6 Qiagen
    • 6.3.7 Illumina
    • 6.3.8 bioMérieux
    • 6.3.9 Hologic
    • 6.3.10 Becton Dickinson
    • 6.3.11 Sysmex Corporation
    • 6.3.12 GE Healthcare
    • 6.3.13 Philips Healthcare
    • 6.3.14 Agilent Technologies
    • 6.3.15 PerkinElmer
    • 6.3.16 Quest Diagnostics
    • 6.3.17 Laboratory Corporation of America
    • 6.3.18 Guardant Health
    • 6.3.19 PathAI
    • 6.3.20 Canon Medical Systems
    • 6.3.21 Bio-Rad Laboratories
    • 6.3.22 Beckman Coulter Life Sciences
    • 6.3.23 Danaher – Radiometer

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the phytopathological disease diagnostics market as the worldwide revenue earned from laboratory-based and in-field kits, reagents, instruments, and digital readers used to detect fungal, bacterial, viral, or nematode infections across crops, ornamentals, and forestry species. We track molecular assays (PCR, isothermal), immunodiagnostics, imaging systems, and point-of-care solutions deployed by research institutes, service laboratories, and farm-level users.

We deliberately omit chemical crop-protection inputs, standalone farm-management software, and animal health diagnostics.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Technology
    • Molecular Diagnostics
    • Immunodiagnostics
    • Digital Pathology
    • Imaging-Based Diagnostics
    • Point-of-Care Molecular
    • Liquid Biopsy
    • Proteomics & Multi-omics Tests
  • By Disease Area
    • Oncology
    • Cardiology
    • Infectious Diseases
    • Neurological Disorders
    • Autoimmune Diseases
    • Metabolic & Endocrine Disorders
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • India
      • Japan
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Middle East and Africa
      • GCC
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East and Africa

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

To close data gaps, we spoke with laboratory directors, extension officers, farm cooperatives, and diagnostic technology vendors in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America. Their insights on test volumes, seasonality, and adoption barriers let us refine penetration rates and validate early model outputs.

Desk Research

We began by mapping the addressable acreage that undergoes disease testing through freely available datasets from FAO, USDA-NASS, Eurostat crop tables, the EPPO reporting network, and peer-reviewed pathogen surveillance papers. Trade flows from UN Comtrade and phytosanitary import alerts helped us gauge cross-border testing demand, and D&B Hoovers filings plus supplier 10-Ks anchored kit pricing and corporate revenue splits. The sources noted here are illustrative, and many additional journals, patent records, and conference proceedings informed our desk analysis.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

We reconstructed demand top-down by linking hectares under intensive cultivation with disease-incidence ratios and average tests per hectare, then priced the total with region-specific ASP curves. Select bottom-up roll-ups of leading kit producers and custom-lab workloads corroborated the totals. Key variables include planted-area shifts, outbreak frequency, regulatory screening mandates, kit ASP erosion, and laboratory throughput. A multivariate regression, supported by climate indices and R&D funding trends, generates the 2025-2030 trajectory, while scenario analysis captures extreme-weather shocks.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Model outputs pass a three-layer review: statistical outlier checks, comparison with independent shipment data, and senior-analyst sign-off. We refresh the dataset annually and issue interim updates when major pathogen outbreaks or rule changes trigger material variance.

Why Mordor's Phytopathological Disease Diagnostics Baseline Deserves Trust

Published estimates often differ because research firms define the product basket and start year in their own ways, and some fold ancillary analytics into diagnostic revenues while others exclude them. Key gap drivers are scope breadth, currency-normalization year, and whether imaging tools are bundled, which is why our baseline captures only direct diagnostic revenues, applies 2024 USD exchange averages, and benefits from annual primary-source refreshes.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 106.3 M (2024) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 123 M (2023) Regional Consultancy A Focuses on government labs, omits point-of-care kits
USD 1.73 B (2024) Global Consultancy B Bundles remote-sensing services, rolls forward a 2022 base

The comparison shows that Mordor Intelligence delivers a balanced, transparent baseline grounded in traceable variables and repeatable steps, giving decision-makers a dependable anchor for strategic planning.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current value of the phytopathological disease diagnostics market?

– The market is valued at USD 106.3 billion in 2024 and is projected to rise to USD 144.28 billion by 2030.

Which technology segment is expanding the fastest?

– Liquid biopsy platforms are growing at a 7.45% CAGR owing to real-time, non-destructive sap analysis.

Why is Asia-Pacific the fastest-growing regional market?

– Large-scale digitization of farms, supportive government financing and frequent pathogen outbreaks drive an 8.10% regional CAGR.

How do CRISPR-based assays improve diagnostics?

– CRISPR-Cas13a systems boost sensitivity and speed, enabling detection of low-viral-load infections directly in the field.

What limits widespread adoption of advanced diagnostics?

– High capital costs, fragmented regulation and a shortage of data-science talent remain primary barriers.

Page last updated on:

Global Phytopathological Disease Diagnostics Report Snapshots