North America Fertilizers Market Size
| Icons | Lable | Value |
|---|---|---|
|
Study Period | 2017 - 2030 |
|
Market Size (2024) | USD 61.08 Billion |
|
|
Market Size (2030) | USD 81.87 Billion |
|
Largest Share by Crop Type | Field Crops |
|
|
CAGR (2024 - 2030) | 5.00 % |
|
Largest Share by Country | United States |
Major Players |
||
|
||
|
*Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in alphabetical order. |
North America Fertilizers Market Analysis
The North America Fertilizers Market size is estimated at 61.08 billion USD in 2024, and is expected to reach 81.87 billion USD by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 5.00% during the forecast period (2024-2030).
61.08 Billion
Market Size in 2024 (USD)
81.87 Billion
Market Size in 2030 (USD)
6.38 %
CAGR (2017-2023)
5.00 %
CAGR (2024-2030)
Largest segment by Product
26.71 %
value share, Urea, 2023
Urea is the most predominantly used fertilizer in North America which is attributed to its high nitrogen content of 46.0%, the highest among all the nitrogenous fertilizers.
Largest Segment by Crop Type
87.66 %
value share, Field Crops, 2023
The demand for cereals such as corn, wheat, oilseeds, and rice is projected to be high in the future, thus fueling the demand for fertilizers in the North America region.
Fastest Growing Speciality Type
7.91 %
Projected CAGR, CRF, 2024-2030
The rising demand for fertigation techniques to ensure the efficient use of fertilizers across major countries such as the United States and Canada is driving the market
Largest segment by Country
46.99 %
value share, United States, 2023
United States of America accounts for about 69% of the total agricultural crop area in the region and one of the major producers of fertilizers in the North American region.
Leading Market Player
11.19 %
market share, CF Industries Holdings, Inc., Inc.
The company boasts a robust regional presence, with manufacturing facilities in the US and Canada, known for their cost-effectiveness, efficiency, and flexibility.
The rising need of fertilizers to increase production and improve yield is anticipated to fuel the growth of the market
- Field crops dominate in fertilizer usage in North America, with a market value of USD 53.0 billion in the year 2022. This is due to the region's large-scale cultivation of field crops, which occupy over 95.0% of the total agricultural land. The United States accounts for 69.0% of the available arable land in the region, with 84.0% of it being used for field crop cultivation.
- Turf and ornamental crops are the second-largest market for fertilizers, valued at USD 4.6 million in the year 2022. Ornamental plants are becoming increasingly popular among homeowners as disposable income and living standards rise, which is expected to fuel the growth of the market as fertilization is essential to maintain the health and appearance of these plants.
- Horticultural crops, accounting for just 7.3% of the total agricultural land, represented roughly 4.5% of the total fertilizer market value in 2022. Despite a 2.5% decrease in horticulture cultivation area between 2018 and 2021, the demand for fruits and vegetables in the region is expected to drive the market at a CAGR of 7.5% during 2023-2030. The decreased acreage directly influences the use of more fertilizers to increase production and meet demand.
- Furthermore, factors such as the increase in fertilizer usage for the improving yield and quality of the crops coupled with reducing arable land and the need to increase production to meet the growing demand are driving the growth of the market. Therefore, the North American fertilizers market value is expected to record a 6.0% CAGR during 2023-2030.
Understand The Key Trends Shaping This Market
Download PDF
Higher cultivation areas under cereal crops in the United States propel the market growth
- In North America, the United States and Mexico constitute more than 80.0% of the fertilizers market value and volume. Even though North America has phosphate and potash resources, the region is a net importer of more than half nitrogenous and over 85.0% potash from international sources.
- The United States and Mexico are the largest consumers of fertilizers in the region, which is majorly due to the higher cultivation areas holding 66.8% and 18.7% of the total crop acreage of North America. Additional scientific and technical advancements in fertilizers in recent years have helped farmers maximize fertilizer benefits.
- The United States is the largest market in the region, accounting for about 49.3% of the total fertilizers market value in 2022. The dominance of the United States is mainly due to the higher cultivation areas under cereal crops and various nutrient deficiencies that are addressed by fertilization.
- Generally, in North America, agriculture has been mechanized with the latest technology, particularly in the United States and Canada. These technological improvements demand more efficient and sustainable fertilizers in the region.
- The supply chain disruptions in 2019-2020 declined the fertilizer value and volume in the region. However, between 2020 and 2021, the demand recovery for fertilizers and increased input costs resulted in a spike in the fertilizer value.
- In the North American region, the United States and Mexico are the biggest and most advanced economies. Most of the multinational companies are situated in the region, giving growers and farmers an advantage in terms of fertilizer product availability.
North America Fertilizers Market Trends
The financial support by the government, such as subsidies, has contributed to the expansion of field crops
- A wide array of crops are grown on North American farms, mainly covering field crops. Corn, cotton, rice, soybean, and wheat are some of the dominating field crops across the region. The United States, Canada, and Mexico are major contributors to the region's agricultural output. In 2022, field crops covered around 97.6% of the overall cultivation in North America, with cereals and oilseeds dominating the market.
- The United States dominates the market, with 135.7 million hectares of the overall area under crop cultivation during the study period. Field crops and horticulture cover the majority of the area, and they accounted for shares of 97.2% and 2.8%, respectively, in 2022. However, during 2018-2019, the country witnessed a significant dip in crop acreages, mainy due to unfavorable environmental conditions that resulted in heavy floods in areas like Texas and Houston.
- The most cultivated crop is corn, the majority of which is grown in a region known as the 'Corn Belt' traditional area in the midwestern United States, roughly covering western Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, eastern Nebraska, and eastern Kansas, in which corn (maize) and soybeans are the dominant crops. It is the major rice exporter, and rice cultivation in the region is mainly concentrated in 4 regions, with three in the South and one in California. Therefore, the increased market potential for the region's field crop, coupled with the increased government funding and protection, is anticipated to positively drive the area under field crop cultivation in the region.
Understand The Key Trends Shaping This Market
Download PDF
Among all the primary nutrients, nitrogen is applied in a higher quantity to field crops, which is equivalent to 229.8 kg/hectare
- Field crops, including rice, corn/maize, wheat, and rapeseed/canola, rank high in nutrient consumption in the region. In 2022, rice led the pack, consuming around 140.85 kg/hectare of primary nutrients, closely followed by rapeseed/canola at 118.40 kg/hectare. Cereals, being extensively cultivated, exhibit a higher appetite for nitrogen-based fertilizers. This intensive cultivation depletes soil nutrients, necessitating increased fertilizer application for optimal growth.
- Nitrogen dominates the primary nutrient usage, accounting for approximately 74.0% in 2022, translating to 229.8 kg/hectare for field crops. Despite this, nitrogen deficiency remains a significant concern in the region. Consequently, nitrogen supplements are predominantly provided through soil application. Once in the soil, nitrogen converts into mineral nitrate, facilitating easy absorption by plants. Notably, rapeseed, a key nitrogen consumer, enjoys widespread cultivation in the United States.
- Rapeseed finds industrial applications, notably in the production of oils for lubricants, hydraulic fluids, and plastics. While fertilizer usage hinges on soil quality and rainfall patterns, rapeseed's nitrogen requirements typically range from 100 to 150 lbs./acre. Phosphorus and potassium fertility rates exhibit soil-dependent variations, yet the recommended rates, as per AgMRC, span from 0 to 80 lbs./acre and 0 to 140 lbs./acre, respectively.
- Given the pivotal role of primary nutrients in crop nutrition, their application rates are poised for a significant uptick in the coming years, driven by concerns like soil depletion and leaching.
Understand The Key Trends Shaping This Market
Download PDF
OTHER KEY INDUSTRY TRENDS COVERED IN THE REPORT
- Agriculture extension services provided by the government to farmers are expected to drive the cultivation area under horticulture crops.
- Micronutrient consumption is higher in the cabbage crop
- Cabbage, tomato, and cauliflower are among the major nitrogen-consuming crops in North American countries
- Magnesium and sulfur were the major secondary macronutrients consumed by vegetable crops
- Raising micronutrient deficiencies and crop losses increase micronutrient application rates
- Among all the primary nutrients, nitrogen is applied in a higher quantity to field crops, which is equivalent to 229.8 kg/hectare
- Calcium is the most important nutrient required by crops as it helps strengthen the cell walls and reduce bruising and diseases in field crops
- Government policies and financial support are leasing to the increase in the irrigation area in the region
North America Fertilizers Industry Overview
The North America Fertilizers Market is moderately consolidated, with the top five companies occupying 46.49%. The major players in this market are CF Industries Holdings, Inc., Nutrien Ltd., The Andersons Inc., The Mosaic Company and Yara International ASA (sorted alphabetically).
North America Fertilizers Market Leaders
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
Nutrien Ltd.
The Andersons Inc.
The Mosaic Company
Yara International ASA
Other important companies include Haifa Group, ICL Group Ltd, Koch Industries Inc., Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA, Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC.
*Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in alphabetical order.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF
North America Fertilizers Market News
- January 2023: ICL has entered into a strategic partnership agreement with General Mills, in which it will be the supplier of strategic specialty phosphate solutions to General Mills. The long-term agreement will also focus on international expansion.
- October 2022: The Andersons entered into an agreement to acquire the assets of Mote Farm Service, Inc. to expand thier retail farm center network.
- August 2022: Koch invested around USD 30 million in the Kansas nitrogen plant to increase UAN production by 35,000 tons per year to meet growing UAN demand across western Kansas and eastern Colorado.
Free with this Report
Along with the report, We also offer a comprehensive and exhaustive data pack with 25+ graphs on area under cultivation and average application rate per hectare. The data pack includes Globe, North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and Africa.
North America Fertilizers Market Report - Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & KEY FINDINGS
REPORT OFFERS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Study Assumptions & Market Definition
1.2. Scope of the Study
1.3. Research Methodology
2. KEY INDUSTRY TRENDS
2.1. Acreage Of Major Crop Types
2.1.1. Field Crops
2.1.2. Horticultural Crops
2.2. Average Nutrient Application Rates
2.2.1. Micronutrients
2.2.1.1. Field Crops
2.2.1.2. Horticultural Crops
2.2.2. Primary Nutrients
2.2.2.1. Field Crops
2.2.2.2. Horticultural Crops
2.2.3. Secondary Macronutrients
2.2.3.1. Field Crops
2.2.3.2. Horticultural Crops
2.3. Agricultural Land Equipped For Irrigation
2.4. Regulatory Framework
2.5. Value Chain & Distribution Channel Analysis
3. MARKET SEGMENTATION (includes market size in Value in USD and Volume, Forecasts up to 2030 and analysis of growth prospects)
3.1. Type
3.1.1. Complex
3.1.2. Straight
3.1.2.1. Micronutrients
3.1.2.1.1. Boron
3.1.2.1.2. Copper
3.1.2.1.3. Iron
3.1.2.1.4. Manganese
3.1.2.1.5. Molybdenum
3.1.2.1.6. Zinc
3.1.2.1.7. Others
3.1.2.2. Nitrogenous
3.1.2.2.1. Ammonium Nitrate
3.1.2.2.2. Anhydrous Ammonia
3.1.2.2.3. Urea
3.1.2.2.4. Others
3.1.2.3. Phosphatic
3.1.2.3.1. DAP
3.1.2.3.2. MAP
3.1.2.3.3. SSP
3.1.2.3.4. TSP
3.1.2.3.5. Others
3.1.2.4. Potassic
3.1.2.4.1. MoP
3.1.2.4.2. SoP
3.1.2.4.3. Others
3.1.2.5. Secondary Macronutrients
3.1.2.5.1. Calcium
3.1.2.5.2. Magnesium
3.1.2.5.3. Sulfur
3.2. Form
3.2.1. Conventional
3.2.2. Speciality
3.2.2.1. CRF
3.2.2.2. Liquid Fertilizer
3.2.2.3. SRF
3.2.2.4. Water Soluble
3.3. Application Mode
3.3.1. Fertigation
3.3.2. Foliar
3.3.3. Soil
3.4. Crop Type
3.4.1. Field Crops
3.4.2. Horticultural Crops
3.4.3. Turf & Ornamental
3.5. Country
3.5.1. Canada
3.5.2. Mexico
3.5.3. United States
3.5.4. Rest of North America
4. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
4.1. Key Strategic Moves
4.2. Market Share Analysis
4.3. Company Landscape
4.4. Company Profiles
4.4.1. CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
4.4.2. Haifa Group
4.4.3. ICL Group Ltd
4.4.4. Koch Industries Inc.
4.4.5. Nutrien Ltd.
4.4.6. Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
4.4.7. The Andersons Inc.
4.4.8. The Mosaic Company
4.4.9. Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC
4.4.10. Yara International ASA
5. KEY STRATEGIC QUESTIONS FOR FERTILIZER CEOS
6. APPENDIX
6.1. Global Overview
6.1.1. Overview
6.1.2. Porter’s Five Forces Framework
6.1.3. Global Value Chain Analysis
6.1.4. Market Dynamics (DROs)
6.2. Sources & References
6.3. List of Tables & Figures
6.4. Primary Insights
6.5. Data Pack
6.6. Glossary of Terms
List of Tables & Figures
- Figure 1:
- CULTIVATION OF FIELD CROPS IN HECTARE, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2022
- Figure 2:
- CULTIVATION OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN HECTARE, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2022
- Figure 3:
- CONSUMPTION OF MICRONUTRIENTS BY FIELD CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, NORTH AMERICA, 2022
- Figure 4:
- CONSUMPTION OF MICRONUTRIENTS BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, NORTH AMERICA, 2022
- Figure 5:
- CONSUMPTION OF PRIMARY NUTRIENTS BY FIELD CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, NORTH AMERICA, 2022
- Figure 6:
- CONSUMPTION OF PRIMARY NUTRIENTS BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, NORTH AMERICA, 2022
- Figure 7:
- CONSUMPTION OF SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS BY FIELD CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, NORTH AMERICA, 2022
- Figure 8:
- CONSUMPTION OF SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, NORTH AMERICA, 2022
- Figure 9:
- AGRICULTURAL LAND EQUIPPED FOR IRRIGATION IN HECTARE, NORTH AMERICA, 2022
- Figure 10:
- FERTILIZER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 11:
- FERTILIZER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 12:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY TYPE IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 13:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY TYPE IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 14:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 15:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 16:
- COMPLEX FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 17:
- COMPLEX FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 18:
- COMPLEX FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 19:
- STRAIGHT FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY NUTRIENT IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 20:
- STRAIGHT FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY NUTRIENT IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 21:
- STRAIGHT FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY NUTRIENT VOLUME IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 22:
- STRAIGHT FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY NUTRIENT VALUE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 23:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY MICRONUTRIENTS IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 24:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY MICRONUTRIENTS IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 25:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY MICRONUTRIENTS IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 26:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY MICRONUTRIENTS IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 27:
- BORON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 28:
- BORON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 29:
- BORON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 30:
- COPPER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 31:
- COPPER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 32:
- COPPER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 33:
- IRON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 34:
- IRON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 35:
- IRON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 36:
- MANGANESE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 37:
- MANGANESE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 38:
- MANGANESE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 39:
- MOLYBDENUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 40:
- MOLYBDENUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 41:
- MOLYBDENUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 42:
- ZINC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 43:
- ZINC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 44:
- ZINC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 45:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 46:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 47:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 48:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY NITROGENOUS IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 49:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY NITROGENOUS IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 50:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY NITROGENOUS IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 51:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY NITROGENOUS IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 52:
- AMMONIUM NITRATE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 53:
- AMMONIUM NITRATE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 54:
- AMMONIUM NITRATE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 55:
- ANHYDROUS AMMONIA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 56:
- ANHYDROUS AMMONIA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 57:
- ANHYDROUS AMMONIA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 58:
- UREA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 59:
- UREA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 60:
- UREA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 61:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 62:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 63:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 64:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PHOSPHATIC IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 65:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PHOSPHATIC IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 66:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY PHOSPHATIC IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 67:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY PHOSPHATIC IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 68:
- DAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 69:
- DAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 70:
- DAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 71:
- MAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 72:
- MAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 73:
- MAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 74:
- SSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 75:
- SSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 76:
- SSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 77:
- TSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 78:
- TSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 79:
- TSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 80:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 81:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 82:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 83:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY POTASSIC IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 84:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY POTASSIC IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 85:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY POTASSIC IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 86:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY POTASSIC IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 87:
- MOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 88:
- MOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 89:
- MOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 90:
- SOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 91:
- SOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 92:
- SOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 93:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 94:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 95:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 96:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 97:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 98:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 99:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 100:
- CALCIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 101:
- CALCIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 102:
- CALCIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 103:
- MAGNESIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 104:
- MAGNESIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 105:
- MAGNESIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 106:
- SULFUR FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 107:
- SULFUR FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 108:
- SULFUR FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 109:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY FORM IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 110:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY FORM IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 111:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY FORM IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 112:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 113:
- CONVENTIONAL FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 114:
- CONVENTIONAL FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 115:
- CONVENTIONAL FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2022 VS 2030
- Figure 116:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY SPECIALITY TYPE IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 117:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY SPECIALITY TYPE IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 118:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY SPECIALITY TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 119:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY SPECIALITY TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 120:
- CRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 121:
- CRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 122:
- CRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY CROP TYPE IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 123:
- LIQUID FERTILIZER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 124:
- LIQUID FERTILIZER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 125:
- LIQUID FERTILIZER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY CROP TYPE IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 126:
- SRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 127:
- SRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 128:
- SRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY CROP TYPE IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 129:
- WATER SOLUBLE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 130:
- WATER SOLUBLE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 131:
- WATER SOLUBLE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY CROP TYPE IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 132:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY APPLICATION MODE IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 133:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY APPLICATION MODE IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 134:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY APPLICATION MODE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 135:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY APPLICATION MODE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 136:
- FERTIGATION APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 137:
- FERTIGATION APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 138:
- FERTIGATION APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 139:
- FOLIAR APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 140:
- FOLIAR APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 141:
- FOLIAR APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 142:
- SOIL APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 143:
- SOIL APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 144:
- SOIL APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 145:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY CROP TYPE IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 146:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY CROP TYPE IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 147:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 148:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 149:
- FIELD CROPS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY FIELD CROPS IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 150:
- FIELD CROPS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY FIELD CROPS IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 151:
- FIELD CROPS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 152:
- HORTICULTURAL CROPS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 153:
- HORTICULTURAL CROPS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 154:
- HORTICULTURAL CROPS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 155:
- TURF & ORNAMENTAL FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY TURF & ORNAMENTAL IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 156:
- TURF & ORNAMENTAL FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY TURF & ORNAMENTAL IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 157:
- TURF & ORNAMENTAL FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY TYPE IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 158:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY COUNTRY IN METRIC TON, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 159:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY COUNTRY IN USD, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 160:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY COUNTRY IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 161:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY COUNTRY IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 162:
- CANADA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, CANADA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 163:
- CANADA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, CANADA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 164:
- CANADA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, CANADA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 165:
- MEXICO FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, MEXICO, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 166:
- MEXICO FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, MEXICO, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 167:
- MEXICO FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, MEXICO, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 168:
- UNITED STATES FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 169:
- UNITED STATES FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 170:
- UNITED STATES FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 171:
- REST OF NORTH AMERICA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, REST OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 172:
- REST OF NORTH AMERICA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, REST OF NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 173:
- REST OF NORTH AMERICA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, REST OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 174:
- MOST ACTIVE COMPANIES BY NUMBER OF STRATEGIC MOVES, NORTH AMERICA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 175:
- NORTH AMERICA FERTILIZERS MARKET, MOST ADOPTED STRATEGIES, 2018 - 2021
- Figure 176:
- MARKET SHARE OF MAJOR PLAYERS IN %, NORTH AMERICA, 2022
North America Fertilizers Industry Segmentation
Complex, Straight are covered as segments by Type. Conventional, Speciality are covered as segments by Form. Fertigation, Foliar, Soil are covered as segments by Application Mode. Field Crops, Horticultural Crops, Turf & Ornamental are covered as segments by Crop Type. Canada, Mexico, United States are covered as segments by Country.
- Field crops dominate in fertilizer usage in North America, with a market value of USD 53.0 billion in the year 2022. This is due to the region's large-scale cultivation of field crops, which occupy over 95.0% of the total agricultural land. The United States accounts for 69.0% of the available arable land in the region, with 84.0% of it being used for field crop cultivation.
- Turf and ornamental crops are the second-largest market for fertilizers, valued at USD 4.6 million in the year 2022. Ornamental plants are becoming increasingly popular among homeowners as disposable income and living standards rise, which is expected to fuel the growth of the market as fertilization is essential to maintain the health and appearance of these plants.
- Horticultural crops, accounting for just 7.3% of the total agricultural land, represented roughly 4.5% of the total fertilizer market value in 2022. Despite a 2.5% decrease in horticulture cultivation area between 2018 and 2021, the demand for fruits and vegetables in the region is expected to drive the market at a CAGR of 7.5% during 2023-2030. The decreased acreage directly influences the use of more fertilizers to increase production and meet demand.
- Furthermore, factors such as the increase in fertilizer usage for the improving yield and quality of the crops coupled with reducing arable land and the need to increase production to meet the growing demand are driving the growth of the market. Therefore, the North American fertilizers market value is expected to record a 6.0% CAGR during 2023-2030.
| Type | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Complex | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| Form | ||||||
| Conventional | ||||||
|
| Application Mode | |
| Fertigation | |
| Foliar | |
| Soil |
| Crop Type | |
| Field Crops | |
| Horticultural Crops | |
| Turf & Ornamental |
| Country | |
| Canada | |
| Mexico | |
| United States | |
| Rest of North America |
Need A Different Region Or Segment?
Customize Now
Market Definition
- MARKET ESTIMATION LEVEL - Market Estimations for various types of fertilizers has been done at the product-level and not at the nutrient-level.
- NUTRIENT TYPES COVERED - Primary Nutrients: N, P and K, Secondary Macronutrients: Ca, Mg and S, Micronutients: Zn, Mn, Cu, Fe, Mo, B, and Others
- AVERAGE NUTRIENT APPLICATION RATE - This refers to the average volume of nutrient consumed per hectare of farmland in each country.
- CROP TYPES COVERED - Field Crops: Cereals, Pulses, Oilseeds, and Fiber Crops Horticulture: Fruits, Vegetables, Plantation Crops and Spices, Turf Grass and Ornamentals
| Keyword | Definition |
|---|---|
| Fertilizer | Chemical substance applied to crops to ensure nutritional requirements, available in various forms such as granules, powders, liquid, water soluble, etc. |
| Specialty Fertilizer | Used for enhanced efficiency and nutrient availability applied through soil, foliar, and fertigation. Includes CRF, SRF, liquid fertilizer, and water soluble fertilizers. |
| Controlled-Release Fertilizers (CRF) | Coated with materials such as polymer, polymer-sulfur, and other materials such as resins to ensure nutrient availability to the crop for its entire life cycle. |
| Slow-Release Fertilizers (SRF) | Coated with materials such as sulfur, neem, etc., to ensure nutrient availability to the crop for a longer period. |
| Foliar Fertilizers | Consist of both liquid and water soluble fertilizers applied through foliar application. |
| Water-Soluble Fertilizers | Available in various forms including liquid, powder, etc., used in foliar and fertigation mode of fertilizer application. |
| Fertigation | Fertilizers applied through different irrigation systems such as drip irrigation, micro irrigation, sprinkler irrigation, etc. |
| Anhydrous Ammonia | Used as fertilizer, directly injected into the soil, available in gaseous liquid form. |
| Single Super Phosphate (SSP) | Phosphorus fertilizer containing only phosphorus which has lesser than or equal to 35%. |
| Triple Super Phosphate (TSP) | Phosphorus fertilizer containing only phosphorus greater than 35%. |
| Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers | Fertilizers coated or treated with additional layers of various ingredients to make it more efficient compared to other fertilizers. |
| Conventional Fertilizer | Fertilizers applied to crops through traditional methods including broadcasting, row placement, ploughing soil placement, etc. |
| Chelated Micronutrients | Micronutrient fertilizers coated with chelating agents such as EDTA, EDDHA, DTPA, HEDTA, etc. |
| Liquid Fertilizers | Available in liquid form, majorly used for application of fertilizers to crops through foliar and fertigation. |
Need More Details on Market Definition?
Ask a Question
Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence follows a four-step methodology in all our reports.
- Step-1: IDENTIFY KEY VARIABLES: In order to build a robust forecasting methodology, the variables and factors identified in Step-1 are tested against available historical market numbers. Through an iterative process, the variables required for market forecast are set and the model is built on the basis of these variables.
- Step-2: Build a Market Model: Market-size estimations for the forecast years are in nominal terms. Inflation is not a part of the pricing, and the average selling price (ASP) is kept constant throughout the forecast period for each country.
- Step-3: Validate and Finalize: In this important step, all market numbers, variables and analyst calls are validated through an extensive network of primary research experts from the market studied. The respondents are selected across levels and functions to generate a holistic picture of the market studied.
- Step-4: Research Outputs: Syndicated Reports, Custom Consulting Assignments, Databases & Subscription Platforms
Get More Details On Research Methodology
Download PDF
80% of our clients seek made-to-order reports. How do you want us to tailor yours?
