Global Pain Management Devices Market Size and Share

Global Pain Management Devices Market Summary
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Global Pain Management Devices Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The pain management devices market is valued at USD 11.67 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 18.54 billion by 2030, advancing at a 9.70% CAGR. This trajectory is propelled by an ageing global population, broader reimbursement for neurostimulation, and rapid progress in closed-loop systems that fine-tune stimulation in real time. Neurostimulation devices currently dominate, helped by landmark FDA approvals for adaptive spinal cord stimulators, while ablation systems gain momentum through minimally invasive radiofrequency platforms that promise pain relief lasting up to two years. North America leads adoption amid favorable Medicare policies, whereas Asia-Pacific grows the fastest on the back of Japan’s structured chronic-pain programs and expanding hospital capacity. Intensifying consolidation—typified by Globus Medical’s buyout of Nevro—couples with venture funding for wearable stimulators, deepening both competitive stakes and product innovation. Persistent chip and battery shortages continue to test manufacturers, yet AI-enabled algorithms and sensor ecosystems point to a future of fully personalized pain therapy.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By product type, neurostimulation devices led with 58.72% of pain management devices market share in 2024; ablation devices are projected to expand at a 10.35% CAGR to 2030.
  • By application, neuropathic pain accounted for 32.42% share of the pain management devices market size in 2024, while cancer pain is advancing at a 10.85% CAGR through 2030.
  • By end-user, hospitals and clinics held 66.91% of the pain management devices market share in 2024; physiotherapy centers record the highest projected CAGR at 10.72% to 2030.
  • By geography, North America commanded 43.54% of the pain management devices market in 2024; Asia-Pacific is expected to register an 11.85% CAGR between 2025-2030.

Segment Analysis

By Product Type: Neurostimulation Dominance Drives Innovation

The pain management devices market size reached USD 11.67 billion in 2025, of which neurostimulation captured 58.72% pain management devices market share in 2024. Closed-loop spinal cord stimulators differentiate through adaptive dosing that halves overstimulation complaints while granting full-body MRI access, features now standard in leading systems. Peripheral nerve stimulators stretch indications to postoperative joints and migraines, aided by outpatient-friendly implants the size of a credit card that house inductive coils. Ablation platforms, advancing at a 10.35% CAGR, leverage cooled RF probes that create larger lesions without charring, producing two-year median relief for facet-mediated back pain. Infusion pumps remain essential for refractory cancer pain, dispensing intrathecal morphine that achieves 87.5% opioid discontinuation at one month, thereby underscoring the multi-modality nature of the pain management devices industry.

Innovation clusters around AI enhancement, with onboard processors parsing compound action potentials thousands of times per minute to tailor amplitude and pulse width. Lead materials shift toward segmented silicone overmoulds that conform to epidural anatomy and cut revision risk. Convergent ecosystems pair implants with wearable accelerometers, enabling automatic posture-based stimulation adjustments that sustain analgesia during daily activities.

Market Share
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Application: Neuropathic Pain Leadership Amid Cancer Pain Surge

Neuropathic disorders, notably painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, topped application demand by accounting for 32.42% of 2024 revenue. The pain management devices market size for neuropathic pain is forecast to grow at upper-single-digit rates through 2030 as Medicare coverage expands. Trials show 70% responder rates versus 6% for best-medical-therapy, a differential that emboldens guideline writers to recommend neuromodulation earlier in algorithms. Cancer pain emerges fastest at a 10.85% CAGR, propelled by increasing survivorship and the opioid-sparing benefit of intrathecal pumps. Musculoskeletal pain continues to rely on radiofrequency ablation of genicular, sacroiliac, and basivertebral nerves, reaching more active-age cohorts. Niche indications such as phantom-limb and complex regional pain syndrome attract novel bioresorbable stimulators that dissolve after six months, avoiding explant surgery and lowering infection exposure, a design that resonates with value-based care priorities within the pain management devices market.

By End-User: Hospital Dominance Challenged by Physiotherapy Growth

Hospitals and clinics held 66.91% pain management devices market share in 2024, anchored by operating rooms equipped for fluoroscopy and the presence of multidisciplinary teams. Large centers increasingly embed AI dashboards that integrate imaging, programming, and outcomes, shortening programming visits by 30% and improving staff productivity. Nevertheless, physiotherapy centers log a 10.72% CAGR by adopting non-invasive pulsed-radiofrequency and high-energy shockwave modalities that require no implantation and can be bundled into rehabilitation packages. Expansion of remote-programming platforms enables post-operative adjustments from patients’ homes, reducing hospital touchpoints and widening the end-user base to ambulatory surgery centers and even private practices, trends that diversify distribution within the pain management devices market.

Market Share
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

Geography Analysis

North America, representing 43.54% of global revenue in 2024, benefits from Medicare’s broadened coverage, robust private-payor alignment, and a mature clinician base accustomed to implantable technologies. The United States anchors R&D pipelines, with the FDA granting breakthrough-device designation to multiple AI-driven stimulators in 2024, accelerating time-to-market and reinforcing the region’s supply-side advantage. Canada follows with growing provincial reimbursements for peripheral stimulation, while Mexico’s cross-border medical travel supports neuromodulation procedure volumes.

Europe displays steady, policy-guided uptake governed by the Medical Device Regulation 2017/745, which enforces post-market surveillance and clinical-data verification for every implant class [3]European Commission, “Medical Device Regulation (EU) 2017/745,” eur-lex.europa.eu . Germany and the United Kingdom lead implant counts, yet southern states—Italy and Spain—embrace ablation as a cost-contained alternative. The UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence is reviewing outcome-based pricing for closed-loop stimulators, potentially modelling value contracts that could echo across EU payor systems. EUDAMED database roll-out augments transparency for physicians and importers, smoothing device traceability across borders.

Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing territory, with an 11.85% CAGR through 2030. Japan’s health ministry funds multidisciplinary pain centers, channelling public insurance toward device-guided therapy that offsets an estimated 2 trillion yen annual burden. China’s National Medical Products Administration has streamlined Class III device reviews, shortening domestic approval windows to under nine months, which encourages multinationals to localize assembly lines. India’s nascent reimbursement environment still leans on out-of-pocket spending, but pilot inclusion of spinal stimulators in public insurance schemes signals future gains. Australia and South Korea, already early adopters of high-density waveforms, extend regional best practices through professional-society training programs.

Middle East & Africa and South America together remain under 10% of 2024 turnover yet show double-digit expansion as private hospitals import turnkey pain-care suites, often staffed by visiting surgeons from Europe and North America. Government initiatives to cut opioid dependency enhance acceptance of device-based solutions, positioning both regions as long-range opportunities for the pain management devices market.

Pain Management Devices Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The pain management devices market is moderately concentrated, with Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and the newly merged Globus Medical-Nevro. Medtronic leverages versatile closed-loop algorithms across its Inceptiv spine platform and its Evolve workflow software, creating cross-selling synergy with intrathecal pumps. Boston Scientific emphasizes waveform versatility in WaveWriter stimulators that allow simultaneous tonic and burst patterns, a differentiator in patients with complex pain phenotypes. Abbott capitalizes on proprietary design for full-body MRI-compatibility and remote programming via Bluetooth-enabled smart devices.

The Globus Medical acquisition of Nevro in 2025 adds high-frequency 10 kHz waveforms to an orthopedic hardware suite, opening bundled value propositions for hospitals managing spine fusions and stimulators under one vendor. Saluda Medical advances evoked-potential sensing leads that auto-calibrate output in real time and targets European expansion under the CE-mark framework. Smaller players such as SPR Therapeutics and electroCore focus on less-invasive peripheral and vagus pathways, underwritten by venture funding that exceeded USD 100 million across top start-ups in 2024-2025.

Strategic themes coalesce around digital integration—cloud dashboards, predictive analytics, and wearable-implant harmony. Companies also hedge supply-chain risks by dual-sourcing semiconductors and designing battery-free architectures. Partnerships with university labs accelerate biomarker discovery, enabling real-time titration that may unlock value-based reimbursement models centered on objective functional gains rather than subjective pain scores.

Global Pain Management Devices Industry Leaders

  1. Abbott

  2. Baxter International Inc

  3. Nevro Corp

  4. DJO Global LLC

  5. Stim Wave Technologies

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Medtronic,  Boston Scientific Corporation, Stryker,  Stim Wave LLC,  ICU Medical Inc, Enovis, Baxter
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • September 2024: Zynex Inc obtained FDA clearance for the TensWave non-invasive pain therapy device.
  • September 2024: Nevro Corp began limited US release of HFX iQ with AdaptivAI, an adaptive spinal cord stimulation platform
  • April 2024: Medtronic plc received FDA approval for the Inceptiv closed-loop rechargeable spinal cord stimulator for chronic pain.

Table of Contents for Global Pain Management Devices Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Rising Chronic Pain & Ageing Population
    • 4.2.2 Technological Advances In Neuromodulation
    • 4.2.3 Favourable Reimbursement For Scs
    • 4.2.4 Ai-Driven Closed-Loop Stimulation Algorithms
    • 4.2.5 Wearable–Implantable Sensor Ecosystems
    • 4.2.6 VC surge in peripheral nerve stimulation startups
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Preference For Pharmaceuticals
    • 4.3.2 High Implantation Cost & Limited Implanters
    • 4.3.3 Insurer Scrutiny Over Explantations
    • 4.3.4 Chip & Battery Supply-Chain Constraints
  • 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porters Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value)

  • 5.1 By Product Type
    • 5.1.1 Neurostimulation Devices
    • 5.1.2 Infusion Pumps
    • 5.1.3 Ablation Devices
  • 5.2 By Application
    • 5.2.1 Musculoskeletal
    • 5.2.2 Cancer Pain
    • 5.2.3 Neuropathic Pain
    • 5.2.4 Facial Pain & Migraine
    • 5.2.5 Others
  • 5.3 By End-User
    • 5.3.1 Physiotherapy Centres
    • 5.3.2 Hospitals & Clinics
    • 5.3.3 Others
  • 5.4 By Geography
    • 5.4.1 North America
    • 5.4.1.1 United States
    • 5.4.1.2 Canada
    • 5.4.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.4.2 Europe
    • 5.4.2.1 Germany
    • 5.4.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.2.3 France
    • 5.4.2.4 Italy
    • 5.4.2.5 Spain
    • 5.4.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.4.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.3.1 China
    • 5.4.3.2 Japan
    • 5.4.3.3 India
    • 5.4.3.4 Australia
    • 5.4.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.4.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.4 Middle East & Africa
    • 5.4.4.1 GCC
    • 5.4.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.4.4.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • 5.4.5 South America
    • 5.4.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.4.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Medtronic
    • 6.3.2 Boston Scientific
    • 6.3.3 Abbott
    • 6.3.4 Stryker
    • 6.3.5 Baxter
    • 6.3.6 ICU Medical
    • 6.3.7 Enovis
    • 6.3.8 LivaNova
    • 6.3.9 DJO Global
    • 6.3.10 SPR Therapeutics
    • 6.3.11 Nevro Corp
    • 6.3.12 Stimwave/Curonix
    • 6.3.13 Avanos Medical
    • 6.3.14 Smith & Nephew
    • 6.3.15 Nalu Medical
    • 6.3.16 Saluda Medical
    • 6.3.17 Globus Medical

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study, according to Mordor Intelligence, defines the pain management devices market as global revenue generated from neurostimulation, electro-analgesia, infusion, and radio-frequency ablation systems that are cleared for clinical pain relief across hospitals, physiotherapy centers, and home settings.

Scope exclusion: We do not include veterinary equipment, beauty-oriented massagers, or disposable consumables such as catheters.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Product Type
    • Neurostimulation Devices
    • Infusion Pumps
    • Ablation Devices
  • By Application
    • Musculoskeletal
    • Cancer Pain
    • Neuropathic Pain
    • Facial Pain & Migraine
    • Others
  • By End-User
    • Physiotherapy Centres
    • Hospitals & Clinics
    • Others
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • Australia
      • South Korea
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East & Africa
      • GCC
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Our analysts interviewed pain clinicians, biomedical engineers, hospital procurement leads, and regional distributors across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. These exchanges validated average selling prices, refined penetration assumptions, and confirmed refresh rates for capital equipment.

Desk Research

We began with public datasets that map pain prevalence and device uptake, such as WHO Global Health Estimates, CDC National Center for Health Statistics, Eurostat discharge files, and UN Comtrade codes 901890 and 901819. Regulatory filings on the US FDA 510(k) and EU MDR portals helped trace launch timelines, while peer-reviewed articles in Pain and The NEJM clarified clinical adoption curves. Financial disclosures, SEC 10-Ks, investor decks, and reputable press added revenue splits and pipeline clues. Paid repositories, including D&B Hoovers and Dow Jones Factiva, supported company benchmarking and news verification. This list is indicative; many further data points were consulted for cross-checks and historical continuity.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down and bottom-up blend was applied. We first sized treated patient pools by indication and region, multiplied them by device utilization, and blended ASPs. Results were then corroborated with sampled supplier roll-ups and channel checks to temper totals. Key variables like chronic pain prevalence, neurostimulation penetration, reimbursement shifts, procedure volumes, device replacement cycles, and currency trends feed a multivariate regression forecast. Where granular bottom-up data were absent, weighted regional proxies agreed during expert calls and bridged the gaps.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

We run iterative variance reviews. Outputs are squared against customs tallies, hospital capex surveys, and select vendor revenues. Models pass two analyst reviews and refresh annually, with interim updates triggered by major regulatory or M&A events.

Why Mordor's Pain Management Devices Baseline Commands Industry Confidence

We recognize published market values often diverge; differing product baskets, geographic reach, price bases, and update cadences usually explain the gaps.

Key gap drivers include exclusion of infusion pumps, outpatient channels left untracked, spot-rate currency conversions, and shorter historical back-tests adopted by some publishers.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 11.67 bn (2025) Mordor Intelligence
USD 7.65 bn (2024) Global Consultancy A Omits infusion pumps; relies solely on hospital billing data
USD 5.10 bn (2024) Industry Portal B Counts only Class III devices, five-region scope
USD 3.77 bn (2024) Global Consultancy C Uses list prices without ASP adjustment; limited historical base

Our disciplined scope selection, transparent variable mapping, and scheduled updates give decision-makers a balanced, reproducible baseline that sits between optimistic shipment tallies and conservative hospital spend snapshots.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

How big is the Global Pain Management Devices Market?

The Global Pain Management Devices Market size is expected to reach USD 11.67 billion in 2025 and grow at a CAGR of 9.70% to reach USD 18.54 billion by 2030.

Which product segment generates the highest revenue?

Neurostimulation leads, holding 58.72% of 2024 revenue, backed by widespread adoption of closed-loop spinal cord stimulators.

Who are the key players in Global Pain Management Devices Market?

Abbott, Baxter International Inc, Nevro Corp, DJO Global LLC and Stim Wave Technologies are the major companies operating in the Global Pain Management Devices Market.

Which is the fastest growing region in Global Pain Management Devices Market?

Asia-Pacific shows the highest CAGR at 11.85% between 2025-2030, mainly due to expanding Japanese and Chinese demand.

Which region has the biggest share in Global Pain Management Devices Market?

In 2025, the North America accounts for the largest market share in Global Pain Management Devices Market.

Page last updated on:

Global Pain Management Devices Report Snapshots