Viral Inactivation Market Size & Share Analysis - Growth Trends & Forecasts (2025 - 2030)

The Viral Inactivation Market Report is Segmented by Method (Solvent-Detergent, Low-PH Adjustment, and More), Product (Viral Inactivation Systems and Accessories, and More), Application (Vaccines & Therapeutics, and More), End-User (Biopharma & Biotechnology Companies, and More), Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, The Middle East and Africa, and South America). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

Global Viral Inactivation Market Size and Share

Global Viral Inactivation Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Compare market size and growth of Global Viral Inactivation Market with other markets in Healthcare Industry

Global Viral Inactivation Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The viral inactivation market stood at USD 7.43 billion in 2025 and is projected to advance at a 6.12% CAGR, reaching USD 10.01 billion by 2030. Heightened biologics output, rising cell and gene therapy (CGT) volumes, and stricter global safety expectations give the market its present momentum. Demand accelerates as regulators phase out legacy detergents such as Triton X-100, steering manufacturers toward environmentally compatible chemistries and heat-based approaches. Outsourcing of viral clearance work to specialist laboratories is rising in parallel with rapid CDMO expansion, especially in Asia-Pacific, where large-scale viral vector capacity is being built to attract Western biopharma projects. Competitive intensity continues to climb as leading filtration, reagent, and service suppliers broaden portfolios through targeted acquisitions aimed at the fast-growing CGT opportunity. The combined effect of these factors cements the viral inactivation market as an essential enabler of biopharmaceutical productivity and patient safety.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By method, solvent–detergent technology led with 46.43% revenue share in 2024; pasteurization and heat treatment is set to expand at an 8.65% CAGR to 2030.
  • By product, kits and reagents commanded 41.45% of the viral inactivation market share in 2024, while validation and testing services are forecast to grow 8.93% annually to 2030.
  • By application, vaccines and therapeutics accounted for 49.54% of the viral inactivation market size in 2024; cellular and gene therapy products are advancing at 8.88% CAGR through 2030.
  • By end-user, biopharma and biotechnology firms held 53.45% demand in 2024; CDMOs record the highest projected CAGR at 9.76% through 2030.
  • Regionally, North America retained 42.12% share in 2024, whereas Asia-Pacific is on track for a 7.45% CAGR to 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Method: Heat Treatment Gains Momentum Despite Solvent–Detergent Dominance

Solvent–detergent procedures secured 46.43% of revenue in 2024, affirming their role as the default approach for lipid-enveloped viral clearance in plasma-derived and recombinant protein products[2]Canadian Blood Services, “Solvent–Detergent Inactivation in Plasma Processing,” blood.ca. Their validated performance profile sustains adoption, particularly where legacy processes face minimal changes. However, pasteurization and related heat modalities are advancing at an 8.65% CAGR as sustainability imperatives reshape process selection. This growth elevates the viral inactivation market size for heat-based equipment suppliers, supported by improved formulations that protect labile proteins during 60 °C holds. Parallel interest in low-pH and caprylate methods persists for monoclonal antibodies where gentle conditions guard Fc functionality.

The European prohibition of Triton X-100 accelerates uptake of alternatives such as Virodex™ detergents and Deviron® reagents, yet heat remains the most regulation-agnostic route. Manufacturers adopt hybrid strategies combining a detergent step with terminal pasteurization to secure orthogonal log reduction credits. Research efforts exploring high hydrostatic pressure for viral vaccines suggest longer-term method diversification opportunities that could widen the viral inactivation market, provided scalability hurdles are addressed[3]Nature Research, “High Hydrostatic Pressure as a Viral Inactivation Tool,” nature.com.

Global Viral Inactivation Market: Market Share by Method
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Product: Services Segment Accelerates as Validation Complexity Increases

Kits and reagents delivered 41.45% revenue in 2024, reflecting baseline consumable demand across every licensed bioprocess. Concentrated formulations and single-use conditioning bags sustain volume despite detergent reformulation mandates. Validation and testing services, on the other hand, are forecast to grow 8.93% annually, lifting the viral inactivation market size for external laboratories that offer end-to-end clearance packages. Their appeal rises as regulatory guidance intensifies data expectations and as in-house BSL-2 capacity remains scarce.


Leading providers supply modular study designs, predictive viral reduction modeling, and GMP-compliant reporting templates, eliminating months from project timelines. Demand for virus inactivation systems—closed-loop heaters, nanofilters, and skid-mounted low-pH reactors—also expands in synchrony with the single-use movement, but services capture disproportionate growth because they embed technical expertise that is difficult to replicate in silico or on-premise.

By Application: Cell and Gene Therapy Drives Next-Generation Demand

Vaccines and therapeutics comprised 49.54% of 2024 consumption by value, benefitting from high-volume influenza and COVID-19 campaigns that deploy integrated solvent–detergent or low-pH holds in standard manufacturing scripts. These mature products continue to underpin the viral inactivation market, yet their CAGR trails CGT because they sit on optimized lines with little room for margin expansion. Cellular and gene therapy modalities are projected to scale at 8.88% CAGR, making them the single fastest-growing demand driver within the viral inactivation industry.


Vector-rich harvests challenge operators to maintain replication competency below detection limits while safeguarding therapeutic potency. Solutions often combine depth filtration, DNAse treatment, and targeted low-pH incubation alongside size-exclusion nanofiltration. Service companies offering fit-for-purpose CGT clearance protocols are therefore capturing premium contracts, while equipment makers develop high-throughput systems capable of processing small, multi-product CGT batches efficiently.

Global Viral Inactivation Market: Market Share by Application
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By End-User: CDMOs Capitalize on Outsourcing Trends

Biopharma and biotech firms remained the predominant clientele in 2024, absorbing 53.45% of total spend as they retain ultimate regulatory accountability for product safety. Their internal capacity focus rests on flagship assets, leaving room for third-party collaborators to manage overflow and specialized assays. CDMOs display a forecast 9.76% CAGR, the highest among end-users, fuelled by Western sponsors shifting operations to Indian and Singaporean plants to mitigate geopolitical risk tied to China-centric supply chains.

Napier-sized CGT CDMOs court venture funding to erect purpose-built suites that host integrated vector production, inactivation, and clearance testing inside one campus. Their expansion raises barriers for small, standalone testing laboratories while consolidating market power within multi-service contract players. CROs maintain a stable niche supporting pre-clinical proof-of-concept batches, although they increasingly partner with CDMOs to present unified offerings to clients.

Geography Analysis

North America preserved 42.12% revenue share in 2024 and continues to anchor the viral inactivation market through advanced CGT clusters in Massachusetts, North Carolina, and California. FDA enforcement, exemplified by Q5A(R2), drives rapid adoption of orthogonal inactivation and inline nanofiltration, sustaining premium demand for high-specification consumables. Strategic capital projects such as Novo Nordisk’s USD 4.1 billion fill-finish expansion in Clayton, North Carolina, embed large-scale viral safety suites that lock in multiyear consumable spend. Thermo Fisher Scientific’s USD 4.1 billion purchase of Solventum’s Purification & Filtration portfolio in February 2025 further concentrates capability in the region and augments integrated clearance solutions.

Asia-Pacific registers the steepest trajectory with a 7.45% CAGR to 2030, buoyed by local policy incentives that accelerate biologics self-sufficiency. India’s CDMO market, valued at USD 15.63 billion in 2023 and headed for USD 26.73 billion by 2028, fuels a rapid rise in BSL-2 laboratory construction and integrated viral clearance services. Meanwhile, China’s Anti-Espionage Law, effective July 2023, complicates foreign GMP inspections, pushing Western buyers to diversify supply chains, yet domestic demand for viral clearance technologies remains robust amid the country’s Five-Year Biotech Plan. Japanese regulators’ early endorsement of Triton-X alternatives accelerates heat-based process validation in local plasma plants, highlighting varied regional technology preferences.

Europe delivers modest but steady expansion as the REACH directive spurs detergent reformulation projects that translate directly into viral inactivation market demand for validation studies. Companies such as Croda and Asahi Kasei lead the response by launching compliant surfactants and ultrafast Planova FG1 filters designed for high-volume monoclonal antibody facilities. State-sponsored innovation grants in Germany and France encourage local SMEs to pilot continuous viral inactivation reactors, although capital intensity constrains scale-up pace relative to North American initiatives.

Global Viral Inactivation Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

The viral inactivation market is moderately concentrated, with the top five suppliers estimated to hold 55–60% combined revenue. Danaher’s 2024 integration of Cytiva and Pall created a USD 7.5 billion bioprocessing division offering filtration, chromatography, and single-use assemblies that collectively address every viral clearance checkpoint. Thermo Fisher’s recent filtration acquisition enlarges its catalog of heat-stable bags, depth filters, and detergent blends, positioning it as a one-stop viral safety partner for emerging CGT manufacturers. Sartorius complements upstream bioreactors with downstream nanofiltration modules and statistical clearance software, underscoring the trend toward platform ecosystems.

Service providers target higher-margin niches. Charles River Laboratories strengthened its viral vector footprint through the USD 292.5 million purchase of Vigene Biosciences in 2024, enabling integrated GMP production, inactivation, and potency testing under one quality system. Merck KGaA’s USD 600 million acquisition of Mirus Bio the same year supplied patented transfection reagents that boost vector titres, indirectly raising subsequent inactivation workloads. Lonza continues organic build-outs, citing more than 70 viral vector development projects executed since 2023, and invests in rapid-cycle low-pH skids to differentiate on clearance throughput.

Technological competition coalesces around sustainability and process economics. Croda’s Virodex detergents and Asahi Kasei’s Planova FG1 filter underscore the pivot toward greener, faster alternatives that reduce buffer use and cycle times. Emerging players pursue high-hydrostatic-pressure, photochemical, and enzymatic solutions aimed at fragile CGT cargoes, yet widespread adoption awaits cost proofs at commercial scale. Organizations able to bundle equipment, reagents, software, and services in a single contract increasingly secure preferred-vendor status during facility design reviews, tightening barriers for niche newcomers.

Global Viral Inactivation Industry Leaders

  1. Merck KGaA

  2. Sartorius AG

  3. Texcell SA

  4. Cytiva (Danaher Corporation)

  5. Parker Hannifin Corp

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Viral Inactivation Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • February 2025: Thermo Fisher Scientific acquired Solventum’s Purification & Filtration business for roughly USD 4.1 billion, expanding its bioproduction and viral clearance capabilities.
  • January 2025: Croda launched the Virodex™ range, offering Triton X-100-free surfactants that meet EU REACH compliance for viral inactivation workflows.
  • August 2024: ViroCell Biologics closed an oversubscribed convertible note to scale GMP viral vector production after UK MHRA licensure.
  • July 2024: Avantor released J.T.Baker® Cell Lysis Solution and Endonuclease to enhance AAV harvest efficiency with lower environmental impact.
  • May 2024: Merck KGaA completed its USD 600 million acquisition of Mirus Bio, strengthening viral vector manufacturing technologies.

Table of Contents for Global Viral Inactivation Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Expansion of Biologics and Gene Therapy Pipelines
    • 4.2.2 Rising Incidence of Viral Contamination Recalls
    • 4.2.3 Stringent Global Regulatory Mandates For Viral Safety
    • 4.2.4 Shift Toward Single-Use Bioprocessing Platforms
    • 4.2.5 Phase-Out of Triton X-100 Driving Alternative Inactivation Solutions
    • 4.2.6 Venture Capital Funding For Viral Vector CDMOs and Start-Ups
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 High Capital Expenditure For Advanced Inactivation Infrastructure
    • 4.3.2 Complex and Lengthy Validation And Regulatory Approval Cycles
    • 4.3.3 Supply Chain Volatility of GMP-Grade Detergents And Filters
    • 4.3.4 Technical Challenges in Continuous Inline Viral Inactivation Integration
  • 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.5 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.5.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.5.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.5.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.5.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

  • 5.1 By Method
    • 5.1.1 Solvent-Detergent
    • 5.1.2 Low-pH Adjustment
    • 5.1.3 Pasteurization / Heat
    • 5.1.4 Other Methods
  • 5.2 By Product
    • 5.2.1 Viral Inactivation Systems and Accessories
    • 5.2.2 Kits & Reagents
    • 5.2.3 Validation & Testing Services
    • 5.2.4 Other Products
  • 5.3 By Application
    • 5.3.1 Vaccines & Therapeutics
    • 5.3.2 Blood & Plasma Products
    • 5.3.3 Cellular & Gene-Therapy Products
    • 5.3.4 Other Applications
  • 5.4 By End-User
    • 5.4.1 Biopharma & Biotechnology Companies
    • 5.4.2 Contract Development & Manufacturing Organisations (CDMOs)
    • 5.4.3 Contract Research Organisations (CROs)
    • 5.4.4 Other End-Users
  • 5.5 Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 Germany
    • 5.5.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.3 France
    • 5.5.2.4 Italy
    • 5.5.2.5 Spain
    • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 Japan
    • 5.5.3.3 India
    • 5.5.3.4 Australia
    • 5.5.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 Middle East & Africa
    • 5.5.4.1 GCC
    • 5.5.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • 5.5.5 South America
    • 5.5.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Charles River Laboratories
    • 6.3.2 Clean Cells
    • 6.3.3 Cytiva (Danaher)
    • 6.3.4 Merck KGaA
    • 6.3.5 Sartorius AG
    • 6.3.6 Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.
    • 6.3.7 WuXi Biologics
    • 6.3.8 Lonza Group
    • 6.3.9 Catalent Inc.
    • 6.3.10 Cygnus Technologies
    • 6.3.11 Texcell SA
    • 6.3.12 Vironova AB
    • 6.3.13 Rad Source Technologies
    • 6.3.14 Parker Hannifin
    • 6.3.15 Pall Corporation
    • 6.3.16 Meissner Filtration
    • 6.3.17 Repligen Corporation
    • 6.3.18 Getinge AB
    • 6.3.19 Asahi Kasei Medical
    • 6.3.20 Sartorius BIA Separations

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Global Viral Inactivation Market Report Scope

As per the scope of the report, viral inactivation is a method of viral processing, where the final product may contain the viruses in an inactive form. The Virus inactivation process is a critical step in process development for biologicals such as tissue and tissue products, stem cell products, and vaccines, and therapeutics. The viral inactivation market is segmented by method (solvent detergent method, ph adjustment method, pasteurization, and others), product (viral inactivation systems and accessories, kits and reagents, and others), application (vaccines and therapeutics, blood & blood products, cellular & gene therapy products, and others), end-user (pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, contract research organisations, and others), and geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Middle-East and Africa, and South America). The market report also covers the estimated market sizes and trends for 17 different countries across the major regions globally. The report offers the values (USD million) for the above segments.

By Method Solvent-Detergent
Low-pH Adjustment
Pasteurization / Heat
Other Methods
By Product Viral Inactivation Systems and Accessories
Kits & Reagents
Validation & Testing Services
Other Products
By Application Vaccines & Therapeutics
Blood & Plasma Products
Cellular & Gene-Therapy Products
Other Applications
By End-User Biopharma & Biotechnology Companies
Contract Development & Manufacturing Organisations (CDMOs)
Contract Research Organisations (CROs)
Other End-Users
Geography North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
Australia
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East & Africa GCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East & Africa
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
By Method
Solvent-Detergent
Low-pH Adjustment
Pasteurization / Heat
Other Methods
By Product
Viral Inactivation Systems and Accessories
Kits & Reagents
Validation & Testing Services
Other Products
By Application
Vaccines & Therapeutics
Blood & Plasma Products
Cellular & Gene-Therapy Products
Other Applications
By End-User
Biopharma & Biotechnology Companies
Contract Development & Manufacturing Organisations (CDMOs)
Contract Research Organisations (CROs)
Other End-Users
Geography
North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
Australia
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East & Africa GCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East & Africa
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the projected value of the viral inactivation market by 2030?

The market is forecast to reach USD 10 billion by 2030, expanding at a 6.12% CAGR.

Which viral inactivation method is growing the fastest?

Pasteurization and other heat-based approaches show the highest growth, with an expected 8.65% CAGR through 2030.

Why is Asia-Pacific the fastest-growing region?

Expanding CDMO infrastructure, supportive government policies, and supply-chain diversification from China toward India drive a 7.45% regional CAGR.

How does Triton X-100’s phase-out affect manufacturers?

Companies must re-validate processes using new detergents such as Virodex™ or shift to heat methods, increasing demand for validation services.

Which end-user segment will grow quickest?

CDMOs lead with a 9.76% CAGR as biopharma sponsors outsource complex viral clearance work to specialised providers.

What score describes market concentration, and why?

A score of 6 reflects moderate concentration; the top five firms hold near-60% revenue while numerous specialist and regional companies remain competitive.

Page last updated on: June 27, 2025

Global Viral Inactivation Market Report Snapshots