Viral Vector Manufacturing Market Size and Share

Viral Vector Manufacturing Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Viral Vector Manufacturing Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Viral Vector Manufacturing Market size is estimated at USD 2.95 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 7.66 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 21.01% during the forecast period (2025-2030).

This trajectory mirrors the transformation of gene therapy from an experimental niche into a regulated treatment class as the tally of FDA-cleared products climbed to 14 in 2024. Breakthrough authorizations such as Casgevy for sickle cell disease and new indications for Elevidys in Duchenne muscular dystrophy validated commercial demand and accelerated funding for production infrastructure. More than USD 8 billion in green- and brown-field projects were announced by major CDMOs during 2024-2025, led by Fujifilm Diosynth and Lonza, yet many suites still run below 50% utilization because they were designed for early-phase work rather than sustained commercial output. Consolidation is intensifying as acquirers chase end-to-end capabilities, advanced analytics and regulatory know-how that shorten time to market.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By vector type, adeno-associated viral platforms accounted for 72.45% of 2024 revenue while adenoviral vectors are projected to grow at a 23.56% CAGR to 2030.
  • By disease, genetic disorders represented 48.45% of the viral vector manufacturing market share in 2024; neurological disorders are set to expand at 24.67% CAGR through 2030.
  • By application, in-vivo therapies held 64.35% of the viral vector manufacturing market size in 2024 and ex-vivo cell therapies are advancing at a 23.55% CAGR to 2030.
  • By mode of manufacturing, in-house production captured 62.45% of the viral vector manufacturing market revenue in 2024, whereas contract manufacturing is forecast to post a 24.56% CAGR to 2030.
  • By geography, North America commanded 47.34% of 2024 revenue and Asia-Pacific is projected to grow at 22.56% CAGR between 2025 and 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Vector Type: AAV Dominance Drives Market Expansion

AAV vectors delivered 72.45% of the viral vector manufacturing market revenue in 2024 as favorable safety, tissue tropism and six FDA-approved therapies anchored demand. The viral vector manufacturing market size for AAV products is expected to increase sharply as hemophilia and muscular dystrophy treatments scale commercial volumes. More than 225 active trials rely on AAV backbones, cementing multiyear capacity needs. CDMOs are commissioning AAV-dedicated suites that leverage suspension bioreactors to lift productivity.

Adenoviral vectors hold the fastest growth outlook at 23.56% CAGR through 2030. Novel serotype engineering mitigates pre-existing immunity, opening repeat-dose vaccine and oncolytic applications. Lentiviral vectors remain essential for autologous CAR-T workflows; improved pH control and competitive inhibition now curb 62.1% functional-particle loss once common in manufacturing. Retroviral and oncolytic platforms serve niche oncology uses, often in combination with checkpoint inhibitors, and benefit from proprietary cell-line partnerships that enhance yield.

Viral Vector Manufacturing Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Disease: Genetic Disorders Lead Therapeutic Applications

Genetic disorders accounted for 48.45% of the viral vector manufacturing market revenue in 2024, among all indications as curative outcomes justified premium pricing structures. Long-term data in hemophilia A, hemophilia B and sickle cell disease incentivized payers to adopt outcome-based payment schemes. The viral vector manufacturing market size for these rare conditions remains sizable due to pent-up demand, newborn screening programs and expanded label use.

Neurological disorders are slated to record a 24.67% CAGR through 2030. Intrathecal and intraparenchymal delivery methods overcame earlier barriers posed by the blood-brain barrier. Positive safety and efficacy readouts in spinal muscular atrophy and inherited retinal diseases are driving new Parkinson’s and ALS candidates. Oncology retains a stable share via CAR-T therapies that depend on lentiviral backbones, while infectious disease projects pivot toward adenoviral vectors during outbreak scenarios.

By Application: In-Vivo Therapies Drive Market Growth

In-vivo therapies captured 64.35% of the viral vector manufacturing market revenue in 2024 because they require only vector manufacture instead of individualized cell manipulation. Recent capsid innovations raised transduction efficiency, allowing lower doses and shortening infusion times. Two intramuscular AAV candidates filed in 2025 highlight the widening substrate for direct administration.

Ex-vivo cell therapy programs hold the highest growth rate at 23.55% CAGR, propelled by edits for sickle cell disease and beta-thalassemia that validated manufacturing economics. Engineered producer lines such as NuPro-2S reduce DNA impurities by 89%, improving consistency. Preventive vaccinology leverages adenoviral vectors for pandemic preparedness but faces competitive pressure from rapidly adaptable mRNA platforms.

Viral Vector Manufacturing Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Mode of Manufacturing: Contract Manufacturing Accelerates

In-house suites still generated 62.45% of 2024 revenue as firms safeguarded process knowledge. However, capacity limits and escalating CapEx have led numerous sponsors to shift toward external partners. The viral vector manufacturing market is therefore tilting toward CDMOs that supply turn-key analytics, process validation and regulatory support.

Contract services are expected to grow at 24.56% CAGR to 2030. Lonza’s USD 1.2 billion Vacaville acquisition and Fujifilm Diosynth’s USD 1.2 billion North Carolina expansion each added more than 300,000 L of bioreactor volume. Hybrid strategies are gaining favor as developers keep small-scale R&D internal while outsourcing commercial lots, giving flexibility without foregoing core intellectual property control.

Geography Analysis

North America held 47.34% of 2024 revenue, driven by the FDA’s clear regulatory road map and dense biotechnology clusters in Boston, Research Triangle Park and the San Francisco Bay Area. Resilience’s USD 225 million capacity build in Ohio and GenScript ProBio’s 128,000 ft² New Jersey site underline investor faith in domestic infrastructure. The region also benefits from the deepest labor pool of vector-skilled specialists.

Europe ranked second and received a boost from Germany’s EUR 90 million Penzberg center and Novartis’ fully robotized USD 43 million facility in Slovenia. Harmonized EMA guidelines streamline filings, although Brexit still imposes dual-site quality reviews for products crossing the Channel. Environmental regulations in the EU encourage single-use systems that lower water usage and carbon footprints, influencing procurement policies across the viral vector manufacturing market.

Asia-Pacific is projected to register a 22.56% CAGR through 2030. China reserved USD 4.17 billion for biomanufacturing lines beginning in 2025, while Japan, India and South Korea upgrade regulatory frameworks to attract multinational trials. WuXi Biologics reported 2024 revenue growth that funds additional vector lines in Wuxi and Suzhou. Large treatment-naïve patient pools and competitive operating costs make the region a preferred launchpad for late-phase outsourcing.

Viral Vector Manufacturing Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The viral vector manufacturing market shows moderate concentration as leading CDMOs acquire specialty firms to integrate cell-line development, analytical assays and fill-finish under one roof. Charles River’s USD 292.5 million purchase of Vigene Biosciences, Merck KGaA’s USD 600 million acquisition of Mirus Bio and Lonza’s USD 1.2 billion buyout of Genentech’s Vacaville plant illustrate the premiums paid for proven scalability.

Technology differentiation is now essential. Form Bio’s AI engine predicts optimal AAV capsids, reducing trial-and-error loops and shaving months off development timelines. Engineered cell lines that cut residual DNA below regulatory thresholds and AI-driven digital twins that forecast batch yields provide measurable performance gains. Operators without such toolsets risk competing on price rather than value-added science.

White-space prospects lie in emerging markets and niche vectors. VIVEbiotech raised fresh capital to expand lentiviral services for neuro-oncology programs. ViroCell Biologics completed oversubscribed financing to accelerate clinical-stage production in the United Kingdom. New entrants can still gain traction by specializing in rare serotypes, regional fill-finish, or next-generation analytics.

Viral Vector Manufacturing Industry Leaders

  1. Lonza

  2. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.

  3. Charles River Laboratories

  4. Fujifilm Diosynth Biotechnologies

  5. Catalent

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Viral Vector Manufacturing Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • March 2025: WuXi Biologics reported solid 2024 results and forecast accelerated 2025 growth, citing fresh vector capacity in Asia-Pacific.
  • February 2025: Takara Bio launched 50 L–5,000 L single-use bioreactors for large-scale vector production.
  • February 2025: Novartis opened a EUR 40 million automated viral vector plant in Slovenia.
  • January 2025: Fujifilm Diosynth said 2025 will be its biggest expansion year, tripling Holly Springs bioreactor volume.
  • December 2024: VIVEbiotech secured growth investment from Ampersand Capital Partners.

Table of Contents for Viral Vector Manufacturing Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Growing Gene Therapy Pipeline and Clinical Successes
    • 4.2.2 Increasing CDMO Outsourcing and Capacity Expansions
    • 4.2.3 Strong Venture Capital And Government Funding In Cell & Gene Therapies
    • 4.2.4 Transition to Suspension Cell Culture Platforms
    • 4.2.5 Adoption of Single-Use Bioreactors For Viral Production
    • 4.2.6 Emerging AI-Guided Capsid Engineering Strategies
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 High Cost of Goods and Therapy Pricing Concerns
    • 4.3.2 Regulatory Complexity and Batch-Release Delays
    • 4.3.3 Supply Chain Constraints For GMP-Grade Plasmids
    • 4.3.4 Competition From Non-Viral Delivery Technologies
  • 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.5 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.5.1 Threat Of New Entrants
    • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power Of Buyers
    • 4.5.3 Bargaining Power Of Suppliers
    • 4.5.4 Threat Of Substitute Products
    • 4.5.5 Intensity Of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

  • 5.1 By Vector Type
    • 5.1.1 Adeno-Associated Viral (AAV) Vectors
    • 5.1.2 Lentiviral Vectors
    • 5.1.3 Adenoviral Vectors
    • 5.1.4 Retroviral & ?-Retroviral Vectors
    • 5.1.5 Oncolytic & Other Engineered Viruses
  • 5.2 By Disease
    • 5.2.1 Cancer
    • 5.2.2 Genetic Disorders
    • 5.2.3 Infectious Diseases
    • 5.2.4 Neurological Disorders
    • 5.2.5 Other Therapeutic Areas
  • 5.3 By Application
    • 5.3.1 In-Vivo Gene Therapy
    • 5.3.2 Ex-Vivo Cell-Therapy Manufacturing (CAR-T, TCR-T, Etc.)
    • 5.3.3 Preventive & Therapeutic Vaccinology
  • 5.4 By Mode Of Manufacturing
    • 5.4.1 In-House Manufacturing
    • 5.4.2 Contract Manufacturing (CDMOs)
  • 5.5 Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 Germany
    • 5.5.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.3 France
    • 5.5.2.4 Italy
    • 5.5.2.5 Spain
    • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 Japan
    • 5.5.3.3 India
    • 5.5.3.4 Australia
    • 5.5.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 Middle East & Africa
    • 5.5.4.1 GCC
    • 5.5.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • 5.5.5 South America
    • 5.5.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market-Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Business Segments, Financials, Headcount, Key Information, Market Rank, Market Share, Products and Services, and analysis of Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Lonza
    • 6.3.2 Thermo Fisher Scientific
    • 6.3.3 Charles River Laboratories
    • 6.3.4 Fujifilm Diosynth Biotechnologies
    • 6.3.5 Catalent
    • 6.3.6 Kaneka Eurogentec
    • 6.3.7 Merck KGaA (MilliporeSigma)
    • 6.3.8 Oxford Biomedica
    • 6.3.9 uniQure NV
    • 6.3.10 Spark Therapeutics (Roche)
    • 6.3.11 Cytiva (Danaher)
    • 6.3.12 Yposkesi (Servier)
    • 6.3.13 Viralgen Vector Core
    • 6.3.14 Aldevron
    • 6.3.15 Vibalogics
    • 6.3.16 Waisman Biomanufacturing
    • 6.3.17 Novasep
    • 6.3.18 Genezen
    • 6.3.19 bluebird Bio

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-Space & Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study treats the viral vector manufacturing market as the value generated from current-good-manufacturing-practice (cGMP) production of adeno-associated, lentiviral, adenoviral, retroviral, and other engineered vectors that are supplied for clinical or commercial gene and cell therapies. The figures exclude revenue from non-GMP research-grade batches, plasmid DNA backbones, and single-use equipment.

Scope exclusion: platforms that only supply plasmid DNA or non-viral nanoparticles are left outside this assessment.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Vector Type
    • Adeno-Associated Viral (AAV) Vectors
    • Lentiviral Vectors
    • Adenoviral Vectors
    • Retroviral & ?-Retroviral Vectors
    • Oncolytic & Other Engineered Viruses
  • By Disease
    • Cancer
    • Genetic Disorders
    • Infectious Diseases
    • Neurological Disorders
    • Other Therapeutic Areas
  • By Application
    • In-Vivo Gene Therapy
    • Ex-Vivo Cell-Therapy Manufacturing (CAR-T, TCR-T, Etc.)
    • Preventive & Therapeutic Vaccinology
  • By Mode Of Manufacturing
    • In-House Manufacturing
    • Contract Manufacturing (CDMOs)
  • Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • Australia
      • South Korea
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East & Africa
      • GCC
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Discussions with bioprocess engineers at CDMOs, therapy developers across North America, Europe, and East Asia, as well as regulators and equipment vendors, helped validate average yields, failure rates, and price corridors. These conversations also clarified future batch size preferences and commissioning timelines that cannot be inferred from desk work alone.

Desk Research

Mordor analysts began with governmental and scientific sources such as the US Food & Drug Administration's CBER cell-gene approval database, European Medicines Agency advanced-therapy reports, ClinicalTrials.gov pipeline listings, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry. Capacity indicators were gathered from trade bodies like the Alliance for Regenerative Medicine, export shipment clues from UN Comtrade HS 3002 codes, and patent velocity trends using Questel. Public company filings, investor decks, and reputable news feeds via Dow Jones Factiva complemented the landscape view. The sources mentioned illustrate, but do not exhaust, the wider collection mined for datapoints and cross-checks.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down build links treated-patient pools, clinical-trial attrition factors, and expected commercial launches, which are then converted into vector-liter demand via dose times patients norms. Selected bottom-up checks sampled CDMO revenues and average selling price times announced capacity anchor the totals.

Key variables inside the model include: 1. Phase II-III gene therapy count and success probability. 2. Typical vector dose per indication. 3. Average bioreactor titer and batch yield. 4. Installed GMP clean-room square footage that can run viral campaigns. 5. Venture and grant funding trends tied to novel capsid work.

Forecasts use multivariate regression blended with scenario analysis to test funding and titer shocks before finalizing the base case. Gaps in bottom-up coverage are adjusted through calibrated utilization assumptions reviewed with interviewees.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs pass two-layer peer review, anomaly sweeps against external capacity announcements, and currency consistency checks before sign-off. The model is refreshed every year, with interim updates triggered by major facility additions, pivotal approvals, or price resets.

Why Mordor's Viral Vector Manufacturing Baseline Earns Trust

Published numbers rarely converge because firms pick different inclusions, base years, and refresh cadences.

Variation typically stems from mixing plasmid DNA with vectors, counting research-grade batches, choosing distinct currency years, or applying single-scenario outlooks. Mordor's disciplined scope, annual refresh, and dual-path validation remove these distortions, giving decision-makers a dependable starting point.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 2.95 B (2025) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 5.50 B (2023) Global Consultancy A Combines plasmid DNA and vectors; older base year; limited cross-check with CDMO revenues
USD 5.33 B (2023) Industry Journal B Includes research-grade output and downstream consumables; single scenario forecast
USD 1.85 B (2024) Regional Consultancy C Excludes contract manufacturing outside North America; conservative uptake rates

In sum, differences narrow once comparable scope and timing are applied, and this is where Mordor Intelligence provides the most transparent, traceable baseline for strategic planning.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the viral vector manufacturing market?

The market is valued at USD 2.95 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 7.66 billion by 2030 at a 21.01% CAGR.

Which vector type dominates the viral vector manufacturing market?

Adeno-associated viral platforms lead with a 72.45% revenue share thanks to favorable safety profiles and multiple FDA-approved therapies.

Why are CDMOs gaining importance in the viral vector manufacturing industry?

Developers prefer specialized CDMOs for their validated processes, advanced analytics and ready capacity, avoiding the high CapEx of building proprietary plants.

Which region is growing fastest in the viral vector manufacturing market?

Asia-Pacific is forecast to grow at a 22.56% CAGR through 2030, supported by China’s multi-billion-dollar biomanufacturing initiatives and expanding regional capabilities.

What is the main cost barrier for wider adoption of gene therapies?

High production expenses keep therapy prices in the USD 2 million–USD 3.5 million range, but process optimization is slowly reducing cost per dose.

How concentrated is competition in the viral vector manufacturing market?

The top five suppliers control about 60% of global commercial capacity, indicating moderate concentration that still allows new entrants to gain share.

Page last updated on: