United States Energy Storage Market Size and Share

United States Energy Storage Market (2026 - 2031)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
View Global Report

United States Energy Storage Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The United States Energy Storage Market size in terms of installed base is expected to grow from 67.53 gigawatt in 2026 to 194.88 gigawatt by 2031, at a CAGR of 23.61% during the forecast period (2026-2031).

Declining battery costs, federal tax credits, and ISO/RTO market reforms are aligning to shorten payback periods and accelerate project pipelines. Section 45X production incentives are cutting the landed cost of domestic lithium-ion packs by 15%, while FERC rules that let aggregated batteries earn capacity, energy-arbitrage, and ancillary-service revenues have created entirely new income streams. Utilities are turning to storage to replace retiring coal units and to support solar and wind additions, and commercial customers view batteries as insurance against outages and peak charges. Supply-chain localization, long-duration technology breakthroughs, and virtual power plant enrollment programs together are expected to keep the growth trajectory intact even as wholesale prices soften.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By technology, batteries led with 81.7% of installed capacity in 2025, while hydrogen storage is on track for a 30.5% CAGR through 2031.
  • By capacity rating, the 10–100 MWh band captured 38.6% of installed capacity in 2025; systems above 100 MWh are projected to grow at a 36.1% CAGR through 2031.
  • By installation, front-of-the-meter assets held 73 of % Energy storage systems in the United States market share in 2025, whereas behind-the-meter assets are forecast to rise at a 27.3% CAGR to 2031.
  • By application, renewable-integration projects commanded 48.9% of demand in 2025, yet backup-power solutions are advancing at a 31% CAGR through 2031.
  • By end user, utilities accounted for 72.1% of deployments in 2025; residential uptake is the fastest growing at 28.6% CAGR through 2031.

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Technology: Batteries Dominate, Hydrogen Storage Emerges as Long-Duration Solution

The Energy storage systems in the United States market saw batteries secure 81.7% of installed capacity in 2025, leveraging lithium-ion packs that cost USD 271 per kWh for utility-scale projects in 2024. Lithium-iron-phosphate and high-nickel NMC chemistries together account for about 95% of shipments, supported by domestic gigafactories that enjoy 45X credits. Lead-acid retains a 3% niche, while vanadium-flow and zinc-bromine pilots address applications needing 6- to 10-hour discharge. The Energy storage systems in the United States market share for pumped hydro remains minimal for new builds because siting options are limited, though existing facilities continue to provide inertia.

Hydrogen storage is poised for a 30.5% CAGR through 2031, spurred by utility solicitations for 100-hour discharge capability. Mitsubishi Power is converting a Utah coal plant into a 300 MW hydrogen-fueled generator that will store electrolytic hydrogen in salt caverns. Compressed-air projects, such as Hydrostor’s 500 MW California development, offer 8-hour durations at lower capital cost than hydrogen. Flywheel and thermal systems continue to serve frequency and industrial heat niches, respectively, each well under 1% of capacity.

United States Energy Storage Market: Market Share by Technology
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Capacity Rating: Modular 10–100 MWh Systems Lead, Gigawatt-Scale Projects Accelerate

The 10–100 MWh class held 38.6% of 2025 capacity, reflecting utility preference for modular 20–50 MW blocks that match solar projects and avoid complex transmission upgrades. Fluence Gridstack and Powin Centipede dominate this tier with factory-assembled containers that compress construction schedules. Energy storage systems in the United States market size for this band is set to rise steadily as distribution utilities deploy feederscale assets to defer substation upgrades.

Projects above 100 MWh are expanding at a 36.1% CAGR. Vistra’s Moss Landing site in California reached 750 MW / 3,000 MWh in 2024, demonstrating the economic case for gigawatt-hour-scale batteries. AES and LS Power have multiple 300 MWh-plus projects underway in Texas and Nevada to exploit scarcity pricing and capacity payments. Sub-1 MWh systems serve the residential sector, where attachment rates in California exceeded 85% for new rooftop solar in 2025.

By Installation: Front-of-the-Meter Dominates, Behind-the-Meter Surges on NEM Reforms

Front-of-the-meter deployments claimed 73% capacity in 2025. ERCOT’s energy-only design lets storage earn USD 180 per kW-year in 2024 by capturing price spikes. CAISO values effective load-carrying capability, rewarding 4- to 6-hour batteries that narrow the net-load peak. PJM’s revised capacity rules cleared 2.1 GW of storage in its 2025 auction, expanding Energy storage systems in the United States market for utility-owned assets.

Behind-the-meter installations are climbing 27.3% annually. California’s NEM 3.0 tariff, effective 2024, cut midday export credits by roughly 75%, pushing homeowners toward self-consumption via batteries. Enphase, Tesla, and LG dominate residential offers in the 10–15 kWh range, while commercial clients deploy 1–5 MW systems to shave peaks and secure backup power. Walmart pledged in 2025 to roll out batteries at 500 stores by 2027, signaling mainstream corporate adoption.

United States Energy Storage Market: Market Share by Installation
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Application: Renewable Integration Leads, Backup Power Surges on Resilience Needs

Renewable integration represented 48.9% of 2025 demand. ERCOT solar curtailment sets daytime prices near zero, so co-located storage shifts energy into evening peaks above USD 100 per MWh. CAISO’s resource-adequacy test now requires solar projects to demonstrate evening deliverability, effectively mandating 4-hour batteries.

Backup power and resilience are growing 31% per year. California utilities executed 4,200 Public Safety Power Shutoffs in the 2024 wildfire season, prompting a surge of residential and commercial microgrids. The Energy storage systems in the United States market size for backup applications is projected to triple by 2031 as hurricanes and heatwaves strain grids nationwide. Demand-charge management rounds out 22% of use cases, and frequency regulation now holds 18% as fast-response batteries capture ancillary revenue.

By End User: Utilities Dominate Procurement, Residential Segment Accelerates on VPP Programs

Utilities bought 72.1% of capacity in 2025, led by multi-gigawatt solicitations from Xcel Energy, Duke Energy, and Southern Company. Xcel contracted Form Energy for a 500 MW iron-air system due online in 2028. The Los Angeles Department of Water and Power issued a 3 GW storage RFP in 2025 to meet its 100% renewables goal.

Residential adoption, expanding at 28.6% CAGR, is driven by tax credits, time-of-use pricing, and virtual power plant revenue. Sunrun enrolled 15,000 customer batteries into VPPs during 2025, earning each household up to USD 700. Commercial and industrial users make up 18% of demand, focusing on peak shaving and resilience; Duke Energy’s 2025 contract with Eos Energy for zinc batteries in North Carolina underscores C&I interest in chemistries that simplify permitting.

United States Energy Storage Market: Market Share by End User
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

Geography Analysis

California and Texas together provided 58% of new capacity in 2025, yet follow distinct fundamentals. California’s 6.2 GW installed base stems from its 60% clean-electricity target by 2030, resource-adequacy rules, and NEM 3.0’s export-rate cuts. The Self-Generation Incentive Program disbursed USD 180 million in 2024 rebates but now has a 400 MW waitlist. Texas counts on ERCOT scarcity pricing, with average storage revenue of USD 180 per kW-year in 2024, and its streamlined interconnection keeps lead times under two years.

In the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic, New York reached 1.8 GW installed by 2025, concentrated where transmission bottlenecks inflate capacity prices. Massachusetts added 680 MW between 2024 and 2025 under its Clean Peak Standard, encouraging solar-plus-storage to serve evening demand. PJM cleared 2.1 GW in its 2025 auction, but interconnection delays persist.

Southeastern states lag because incentives are sparse and vertically integrated utilities favor gas peakers. Storage penetration in Florida, Georgia, and the Carolinas remains 60% below the national average. Arizona and Nevada, by contrast, have IRPs that collectively call for 5 GW of batteries by 2030 to backfill coal retirements.

The Pacific Northwest relies on hydropower, yet long-duration projects are emerging. Hydrostor’s 500 MW compressed-air plant and Mitsubishi Power’s hydrogen conversion illustrate a focus on seasonal firming. The Midwest suffers the nation’s worst queue congestion; MISO’s 2024 withdrawal rate of 38% underscores the challenge. Federal GRIP grants aim to ease constraints but remain oversubscribed.

Competitive Landscape

Market concentration is moderate. The top five suppliers, Tesla, Fluence, LG Energy Solution, NextEra Energy Resources, and AES, held about a 55% share in 2025. Tesla’s vertically integrated chain drives turnkey prices under USD 250 per kWh while sustaining 15%–18% gross margins. Fluence’s software-centric Gridstack platform secured 4.2 GW of orders in 2024–2025, including a 700 MW contract with Southern California Edison. LG’s Arizona gigafactory guarantees domestic content for Powin and other integrators.

Chinese producers CATL, BYD, and Sungrow underbid U.S. rivals by up to 15% due to lower cell costs, though tariff risk and domestic-content rules temper their growth. Form Energy and Eos Energy are disrupting incumbents with iron-air and zinc chemistries that promise 100-hour or fire-safe performance at competitive costs. Strategic moves include gigafactory build-outs (LG, Panasonic), partnerships on grid-forming inverters (Fluence and CATL), and long-term utility offtake agreements targeting IRA incentives.

United States Energy Storage Industry Leaders

  1. Tesla Inc.

  2. Fluence Energy LLC

  3. LG Energy Solution Ltd.

  4. NextEra Energy Resources

  5. Enphase Energy Inc.

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
United States Energy Storage Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • September 2025: In North America, Electrovaya unveiled its advanced stationary energy storage systems, harnessing its proprietary Infinity battery technology. These modular containerized units, each boasting a capacity of approximately 2 MWh, are designed for diverse applications.
  • July 2025: Peak Energy, a startup specializing in sodium-ion battery energy storage systems (BESS), has successfully launched and dispatched its inaugural sodium-ion BESS. This system is set to be tested in a collaborative pilot program involving nine utilities and independent power producers (IPPs).
  • March 2025: ENGIE and CBRE partnered to develop a 2.4 GW battery portfolio focused on real-estate-adjacent sites.
  • March 2025: Diversified Energy, FuelCell Energy, and TESIAC formed an acquisition vehicle targeting 360 MW of net-zero power, including storage, for data centers in Appalachia.

Table of Contents for United States Energy Storage Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Federal Investment Tax Credit Extension Boosting Residential Storage Demand
    • 4.2.2 FERC Order 841/2222 Accelerating Wholesale?Market Participation of Storage
    • 4.2.3 California Rule 21 & NEM 3.0 Driving Behind-the-Meter Deployments
    • 4.2.4 Solar-plus-Storage Pipeline Growth Across ERCOT and WECC
    • 4.2.5 IRA-Linked Domestic Battery-Manufacturing Tax Credits Lowering BESS Cost
    • 4.2.6 Aggressive Utility IRPs Retiring Coal and Adding Long-Duration Storage
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Interconnection Queue Congestion Delaying Large-Scale Projects
    • 4.3.2 PFAS Li-ion Electrolyte Safety Concerns Triggering Stricter Fire Codes
    • 4.3.3 Uneven State-Level Incentives Undermining National Roll-out
    • 4.3.4 Supply-Chain Critical-Minerals Exposure (Li, Ni, Co) to Geopolitical Risk
  • 4.4 Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Outlook
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter's Five Forces
    • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry
  • 4.8 Installed Capacity Analysis
  • 4.9 PESTLE Analysis

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts

  • 5.1 By Technology
    • 5.1.1 Batteries (Lithium-ion, Lead-acid, Flow Batteries, Sodium-sulfur and Others)
    • 5.1.2 Pumped Hydro Storage
    • 5.1.3 Compressed Air Energy Storage
    • 5.1.4 Flywheel Storage
    • 5.1.5 Thermal Energy Storage
    • 5.1.6 Hydrogen Energy Storage
  • 5.2 By Capacity Rating
    • 5.2.1 Below 1 MWh
    • 5.2.2 1 to 10 MWh
    • 5.2.3 10 to 100 MWh
    • 5.2.4 Above 100 MWh
  • 5.3 By Installation
    • 5.3.1 Front-of-the-Meter
    • 5.3.2 Behind-the-Meter
  • 5.4 By Application
    • 5.4.1 Renewable Integration
    • 5.4.2 Peak Shaving and Demand Charge Management
    • 5.4.3 Frequency Regulation
    • 5.4.4 Backup Power/Resilience
  • 5.5 By End User
    • 5.5.1 Residential
    • 5.5.2 Commercial and Industrial
    • 5.5.3 Utility

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves (M&A, Partnerships, PPAs)
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis (Market Rank/Share for key companies)
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Tesla Inc.
    • 6.4.2 Fluence Energy LLC
    • 6.4.3 LG Energy Solution Ltd.
    • 6.4.4 Sungrow Power Supply Co. Ltd.
    • 6.4.5 BYD Co. Ltd.
    • 6.4.6 Enphase Energy Inc.
    • 6.4.7 NextEra Energy Resources LLC
    • 6.4.8 AES Corporation
    • 6.4.9 Powin Energy Corp.
    • 6.4.10 Samsung SDI Co. Ltd.
    • 6.4.11 Panasonic Holdings Corp.
    • 6.4.12 Eos Energy Enterprises Inc.
    • 6.4.13 EnerSys
    • 6.4.14 KORE Power Inc.
    • 6.4.15 Form Energy Inc.
    • 6.4.16 CATL
    • 6.4.17 Honeywell International Inc.
    • 6.4.18 Hydrostor Inc.
    • 6.4.19 Voith GmbH & Co. KGaA
    • 6.4.20 Andritz AG
    • 6.4.21 Siemens Energy AG

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-Space & Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the United States energy storage market as the installed base and yearly additions of grid-connected and behind-the-meter systems that absorb electricity and discharge it on demand, including battery chemistries (Li-ion, lead-acid, flow, Na-S), pumped-hydro, compressed-air, flywheels, thermal storage, and power-to-hydrogen assets. Capacity is expressed in gigawatts of rated power; value calculations apply technology-specific average system costs.

Scope Exclusions: Mobile traction batteries, fuel-cell stacks used solely for mobility, and pure software dispatch services are kept outside the market boundary.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Technology
    • Batteries (Lithium-ion, Lead-acid, Flow Batteries, Sodium-sulfur and Others)
    • Pumped Hydro Storage
    • Compressed Air Energy Storage
    • Flywheel Storage
    • Thermal Energy Storage
    • Hydrogen Energy Storage
  • By Capacity Rating
    • Below 1 MWh
    • 1 to 10 MWh
    • 10 to 100 MWh
    • Above 100 MWh
  • By Installation
    • Front-of-the-Meter
    • Behind-the-Meter
  • By Application
    • Renewable Integration
    • Peak Shaving and Demand Charge Management
    • Frequency Regulation
    • Backup Power/Resilience
  • By End User
    • Residential
    • Commercial and Industrial
    • Utility

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Mordor analysts interviewed utility planners in California, Texas, and New York, EPC contractors building front-of-the-meter projects, residential solar-plus-storage installers, and component vendors across the Midwest. These conversations validated queue-conversion assumptions, real-world balance-of-system costs, and policy uptake rates, filling gaps that desk research alone could not bridge.

Desk Research

We began with publicly available, high-reliability datasets such as EIA Form 860/861, FERC Electric Quarterly Reports, DOE's Storage Futures Study, NREL price trackers, and American Clean Power's Storage Monitor. Trade association briefs, state PUC filings, patent trends from Questel, and federal incentive updates rounded out policy and cost inputs. Company 10-Ks, investor decks, and project press releases were scraped, while D&B Hoovers supplied revenue breakouts for key integrators and cell makers.

News aggregation from Dow Jones Factiva and peer-reviewed work in journals like Joule provided price-learning rates, safety recall statistics, and cycle-life benchmarks. The sources cited above illustrate the breadth of secondary material; many additional references were consulted for data corroboration and clarification.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down model starts with historical installed capacity from EIA, applies forecast additions drawn from interconnection queues, and layers average $/kW costs to derive value. Results are cross-checked through selective bottom-up roll-ups of vendor shipments and sampled ASP × volume estimates. Key variables include average four-hour system cost declines, ITC step-down timelines, state storage mandates, residential solar attachment rates, and capacity-weighted utilization factors. Multivariate regression, supported by expert consensus, projects each driver to 2030; scenario analysis captures policy or materials-price shocks. Gap handling uses normalized cost curves where bottom-up data are thin.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs pass variance checks against ACP quarterly tallies and DOE price indices, followed by peer review and senior analyst sign-off. Our models refresh every 12 months, with interim revisions triggered by policy rulings or >10% cost swings.

Why Mordor's United States Energy Storage Baseline Commands Confidence

Published estimates differ because firms mix revenue and capacity units, select unequal technology baskets, and apply divergent system-price learning curves. By anchoring figures to verified EIA capacity data and current ITC rules, Mordor captures the market reality decision-makers budget against.

The largest gaps arise when others fold EV batteries into the total, assume blanket eight-hour durations, freeze price trajectories, or extend forecasts without refreshing project pipelines. Our annual refresh and dual-unit reporting avoid these pitfalls.

Benchmark comparison

Market SizeAnonymized sourcePrimary gap driver
49.52 GW installed base (2025) Mordor Intelligence-
USD 106.7 bn (2024) Global Consultancy ACombines revenue and capacity, includes EV traction packs, no price-learning adjustment
USD 138.6 bn (2025) Industry Data Firm BAssumes universal eight-hour duration and utility-only scope
USD 3.62 bn (2025) Research Group CTracks standalone BESS revenue only, excludes pumped-hydro and hydrogen storage

In sum, Mordor's disciplined scope selection, dual top-down/bottom-up cross-checks, and timed refresh cadence yield a balanced, transparent baseline that clients can retrace and replicate with confidence.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

How large is the Energy storage systems in United States market in 2026?

Installed capacity reached 67.53 GW in 2026, and it is projected to climb to 194.88 GW by 2031.

What is the expected CAGR for U.S. energy storage through 2031?

The market is forecast to grow at 23.61% between 2026 and 2031.

Which technology currently dominates deployments?

Lithium-ion batteries held 81.7% of installed capacity in 2025, far ahead of other chemistries.

Why are behind-the-meter installations accelerating?

California’s NEM 3.0 export-rate cuts and nationwide virtual power plant programs improve economics for residential and commercial batteries.

How are federal policies influencing battery costs?

Section 45X production tax credits reduce domestic cell costs by about 18%, lowering turnkey system prices below USD 250 per kWh.

Page last updated on:

United States Energy Storage Market Report Snapshots