Mucosal Atomization Devices Market Size and Share

Mucosal Atomization Devices Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Mucosal Atomization Devices Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The mucosal atomization devices market stood at USD 0.73 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 1.04 billion by 2030, translating into a 7.34% CAGR over the period. This trajectory underscores the sector’s shift toward needle-free delivery, growing hospital and clinic adoption rates, and favorable regulatory actions such as the FDA’s 2024 approval of neffy epinephrine nasal spray [1]ARS Pharmaceuticals Operations, Inc. ,"ARS Pharmaceuticals Announces Filings for Approval of neffy in China, Japan and Australia," ir.ars-pharma.com. Steady launches of propellant-free and smart, dose-counting platforms are widening the addressable base in emergency medicine, chronic allergy care, and preventive immunization, while sustainability mandates are steering product development away from hydrofluorocarbon propellants. M&A momentum, illustrated by Aptar Pharma’s purchase of SipNose’s assets and Paratek Pharmaceuticals’ acquisition of Optinose, is concentrating intellectual property and accelerating integrated device–drug offerings. Growth prospects are further strengthened by rising intranasal vaccine research funding, battlefield analgesia protocols that prefer nasal delivery when venous access is limited, and environmental incentives rewarding low-carbon atomizer formats.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By product type, gas-propelled devices led with 67.73% revenue share in 2024; electrical atomizers are projected to expand at an 8.65% CAGR to 2030. 
  • By end user, hospitals held 49.91% of the mucosal atomization devices market share in 2024, while clinics are forecast to grow at an 8.77% CAGR through 2030. 
  • By geography, North America commanded 42.04% mucosal atomization devices market share in 2024 and Asia-Pacific is advancing at an 8.89% CAGR through 2030. 

Segment Analysis

By Product Type: Gas-Propelled Dominance Faces Environmental Pressures

Gas-propelled platforms represented the largest slice of the mucosal atomization devices market size, accounting for USD 0.49 billion and 67.73% of 2024 revenue. Their entrenched status stems from clinician familiarity, proven dose consistency, and straightforward filling operations. Nevertheless, environmental policy shifts are compelling reformulation. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and the Environmental Protection Agency proposed phase-down schedules for HFC-134a and HFC-152a, prompting manufacturers to pilot low-global-warming blends that deliver at least 90% carbon reduction without compromising plume mass median aerodynamic diameter. Clinical bridging studies indicate pharmacokinetic equivalence, paving regulatory pathways for commercial rollout beginning 2027. Electrical atomizers, by comparison, posted only 32.27% of 2024 sales but generate headline growth of 8.65% CAGR as hospitals gravitate toward propellant-free options with programmable spray volumes and IoT telemetry. Absence of canned gases streamlines global shipping compliance, trimming logistics expenses by 12% on average and mitigating supply chain exposure to propellant shortages. Higher unit cost remains the principal barrier, though total-cost-of-ownership models that factor in environmental levies increasingly favor electric solutions across developed economies.

These dynamics reinforce the expected tilt: gas-propelled units maintain core emergency-medicine dominance through 2026, after which new ESG-motivated procurement policies tip the sales mix toward electrical formats. Manufacturers with hybrid pipelines—able to supply both propellant and propellant-free versions—are positioned to defend share and capture sustainability premiums, preserving competitive balance within the mucosal atomization devices market.

Mucosal Atomization Devices Market: Market Share by Product Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

By End User: Hospital Leadership Shifts Toward Clinic Expansion

Hospitals generated the highest revenue in 2024, capturing 49.91% of the mucosal atomization devices market size through emergency department protocols and perioperative pain management pathways. Monthly stock-rotation programs ensure continuous ordering as atomizers serve multiple purposes, from naloxone reversal to sedation and topical hemostasis. Group purchasing organizations increasingly negotiate portfolio contracts that bundle multi-drug compatibility and pediatric nozzles, encouraging standardization around widely validated platforms. Conversely, clinics, urgent care centers, and physician offices embody the fastest¬-growing channel, advancing at 8.77% CAGR. Drivers include consumer preference for needle-free allergy and migraine therapy administered during scheduled visits, as well as improved reimbursement for office-based drug administration codes. The FDA’s approval of neffy for pediatric anaphylaxis opened a large new cohort for outpatient dispensing, triggering incremental unit sales, especially during high-pollen seasons.

Home-health and long-term-care environments contribute a smaller but rising slice as device ergonomics improve. Battery-operated actuators with audible dose cues allow elderly or vision-impaired patients to self-administer therapies, minimizing caregiver burden. Broadening use cases across settings suggests hospitals will gradually concede share to ambulatory and at-home channels, yet they will remain critical gatekeepers for high-acuity and formulary decisions until the close of the forecast period.

Mucosal Atomization Devices Market: Market Share by End User
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Geography Analysis

North America, anchored by the United States, delivered 42.04% of global sales in 2024, buoyed by an FDA framework that streamlines chemistry-manufacturing-controls submissions and enables 510(k) plus NDA-combination filings. National naloxone distribution initiatives and state-level standing orders bolster everyday demand, while advanced payer systems incentivize smart dose-tracking atomizers. Canada’s Health Canada fast-track for nasal epinephrine products signals regional alignment, shortening launch timelines for cross-border entrants.

Asia-Pacific records the steepest trajectory with an 8.89% CAGR. Japan’s Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency accepted Aculys Pharma’s diazepam nasal spray application in 2024, the first antiepileptic of its kind, establishing a visible regulatory precedent. China’s National Medical Products Administration and Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration evaluated neffy under parallel review pathways, highlighting converging standards that favor multinational submissions. Expanding middle-class healthcare spend and high prevalence of allergic rhinitis in urbanizing economies underpin durable device volume growth.

Europe offers mature but steady expansion as the EU’s Medical Device Regulation imposes stringent post-market surveillance, creating competitive openings for suppliers with robust clinical data and environmental credentials. Adoption of Green Deal targets exerts pressure on propellant-based products, accelerating the pivot to electric atomizers and low-GWP propellants. Emerging territories in Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa represent nascent opportunities: modernization of emergency medical systems and donor-funded vaccination drives stimulate demand, yet structural hurdles—from limited cold-chain networks to clinician training deficits—moderate penetration rates for the mucosal atomization devices market.

Mucosal Atomization Devices Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

The landscape is moderately fragmented yet trending toward consolidation. Aptar Pharma’s USD 12.5 million purchase of SipNose fortified its early-stage biologics atomization capabilities, while Paratek Pharmaceuticals’ USD 330 million acquisition of Optinose diversified its revenue stream beyond antibiotics. Patent litigation at the U.S. International Trade Commission underscores the strategic value of nozzle geometry and dose-metering algorithms; successful enforcement can secure multi-year royalties. Tier-one firms wield vertically integrated manufacturing across elastomer molding and drug-device assembly, delivering scale economies coveted by smaller peers.

Competitive vectors increasingly center on sustainability and digitalization. Companies pioneering HFO-1234ze propellant blends or battery-free piezoelectric drivers attract hospital procurement committees seeking ESG compliance. Simultaneously, IoT-equipped actuators generate real-world evidence that supports health-economics dossiers and payer negotiations. White-space segments—pediatric-specific tips, CNS-targeted nano-carriers, and AI-driven adherence platforms—remain largely uncontested, offering entry points for nimble newcomers willing to navigate regulatory complexity.

Mucosal Atomization Devices Industry Leaders

  1. Teleflex Incorporated

  2. DeVilbiss Healthcare LLC

  3. Becton, Dickinson and Company

  4. Cook Medical

  5. Integra LifeSciences

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
muco.png
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Recent Industry Developments

  • March 2025: Paratek Pharmaceuticals completed the acquisition of Optinose and its chronic rhinosinusitis nasal spray Xhance for up to USD 330 million, broadening its respiratory portfolio.
  • January 2025: BD showcased the BD Accuspray Nasal Spray System for intranasal vaccines alongside prefillable syringes at Pharmapack 2025.
  • January 2025: ARS Pharmaceuticals submitted regulatory files for neffy epinephrine nasal spray in Canada and the United Kingdom via partner ALK-Abelló.
  • December 2024: ARS Pharmaceuticals’ partners in China, Japan, and Australia filed neffy 2 mg packages after trials reported 100% pediatric response and 16-minute median symptom resolution.

Table of Contents for Mucosal Atomization Devices Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Increasing prevalence of allergic rhinitis & sinusitis
    • 4.2.2 Technological advancements in atomizer design
    • 4.2.3 Rising intranasal vaccine / drug-delivery R&D funding
    • 4.2.4 Adoption in pre-hospital & battlefield analgesia
    • 4.2.5 Regulatory push for needle-free vaccination in LMICs
    • 4.2.6 Integration with smart dose-counter IoT modules
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Side effects due to overdose / mist leakage
    • 4.3.2 Availability of alternative delivery routes
    • 4.3.3 Supply-chain fragility of specialty nozzle materials
    • 4.3.4 Environmental concerns over canned-gas propellants
  • 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porters Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitute Products
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

  • 5.1 By Product Type
    • 5.1.1 Gas-propelled
    • 5.1.2 Electrical
  • 5.2 By End User
    • 5.2.1 Hospitals
    • 5.2.2 Clinics
    • 5.2.3 Other End Users
  • 5.3 By Geography
    • 5.3.1 North America
    • 5.3.1.1 United States
    • 5.3.1.2 Canada
    • 5.3.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.3.2 Europe
    • 5.3.2.1 Germany
    • 5.3.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.3.2.3 France
    • 5.3.2.4 Italy
    • 5.3.2.5 Spain
    • 5.3.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.3.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.3.3.1 China
    • 5.3.3.2 Japan
    • 5.3.3.3 India
    • 5.3.3.4 Australia
    • 5.3.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.3.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.3.4 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.3.4.1 GCC
    • 5.3.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.3.4.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa
    • 5.3.5 South America
    • 5.3.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.3.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.3.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Teleflex Incorporated
    • 6.3.2 DeVilbiss Healthcare LLC
    • 6.3.3 Becton, Dickinson and Company
    • 6.3.4 Cook Group (Cook Medical)
    • 6.3.5 Medica Holdings
    • 6.3.6 Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corp.
    • 6.3.7 BVM Meditech Private Limited
    • 6.3.8 Life-Assist Inc.
    • 6.3.9 BTME Group Limited (Medtree)
    • 6.3.10 Wolfe Tory Medical Inc.
    • 6.3.11 Medtronic plc
    • 6.3.12 World Precision Instruments
    • 6.3.13 Westmed Inc.
    • 6.3.14 Smiths Medical (ICU Medical)
    • 6.3.15 Aerogen Ltd.
    • 6.3.16 Solventum
    • 6.3.17 Optinose US Inc.
    • 6.3.18 Kurve Technology Inc.
    • 6.3.19 Impel Pharmaceuticals Inc.
    • 6.3.20 AptarGroup Inc.

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment

Global Mucosal Atomization Devices Market Report Scope

As per the scope of the report, mucosal atomization devices are specific types of devices used to administer drugs through the tracheal mucosal, oral, and nasal surfaces. They are systematic and enable needle-free drug delivery. They are largely used during emergency and pre-hospital treatments. 

The Mucosal Atomization Devices Market is Segmented by Product Type (Gas-propelled and Electrical), End User (Hospital, Clinics, and Other End Users), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the Rest of the World). The report offers the value (in USD million) for the above segments.

By Product Type
Gas-propelled
Electrical
By End User
Hospitals
Clinics
Other End Users
By Geography
North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
Australia
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa GCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East and Africa
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
By Product Type Gas-propelled
Electrical
By End User Hospitals
Clinics
Other End Users
By Geography North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
Australia
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa GCC
South Africa
Rest of Middle East and Africa
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current mucosal atomization devices market size and how fast is it growing?

The mucosal atomization devices market size is USD 0.73 billion in 2025 and is projected to expand at a 7.34% CAGR to reach USD 1.04 billion by 2030.

Which geographic region is expected to record the highest growth rate through 2030?

Asia-Pacific is forecast to grow at an 8.89% CAGR, the fastest among all regions, supported by favorable approvals in China, Japan, and Australia.

Which device category is showing the strongest growth momentum?

Electrical atomizers are advancing at an 8.65% CAGR as healthcare buyers pivot toward propellant-free, IoT-enabled platforms.

Why do hospitals currently account for the largest share of demand?

Hospitals hold 49.91% of the mucosal atomization devices market share because emergency departments rely on nasal delivery for rapid administration of naloxone, ketamine, and other critical drugs.

What recent regulatory milestone has accelerated market adoption?

The FDA’s 2024 approval of neffy epinephrine nasal spray validated intranasal delivery for life-threatening allergic reactions, spurring broader adoption across pediatric and adult populations.

How are sustainability regulations influencing product development?

Proposed U.S. restrictions on high-GWP HFC-134a and HFC-152a propellants are driving manufacturers to develop low-carbon propellant blends and switch to electrical atomizers that meet upcoming environmental standards.

Page last updated on:

Mucosal Atomization Devices Report Snapshots