Mining Laboratory Automation Market Size, Growth, Forecast 2030

Name: Mining Laboratory Automation Market Size, Growth, Forecast 2030
Creator: Mordor Intelligence
License: https://www.mordorintelligence.com/privacy-policy

Mining Laboratory Automation Market Size and Share

Market Overview

Study Period	2019 - 2030
Market Size (2025)	USD 7.22 Billion
Market Size (2030)	USD 11.78 Billion
Growth Rate (2025 - 2030)	10.29% CAGR
Fastest Growing Market	Middle East and Africa
Largest Market	Asia Pacific
Market Concentration	Medium
Major Players *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Mining Laboratory Automation Market Summary — Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Mining Laboratory Automation Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Mining Laboratory Automation market stands at USD 7.22 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 11.78 billion by 2030, advancing at a 10.29% CAGR through the forecast period mining-technology.com. Robust demand stems from mine-site digitalization programs that seek faster turn-around of assays, tighter grade control, and lower human-exposure to hazardous environments. Autonomous sampling systems now link directly with cloud-hosted LIMS platforms, enabling pit-to-port traceability that boosts ore recovery, trims re-handling costs, and strengthens ESG compliance. Mid- and large-scale miners are digitizing laboratories to counter scarce skilled labor, while containerized labs shorten development timelines for green-field projects. Convergence of robotics, AI, and modular instrumentation is creating scalable ecosystems that lower total cost of ownership and give early adopters 18–24-month payback horizons. Investment momentum is reinforced by regional policy pushes, particularly in Australia, Chile, Saudi Arabia, and Ghana, where regulators and sovereign funds are steering capital toward automated mining value chains.

Key Report Takeaways

By product category, robotics led with 34.1% revenue share in 2024; LIMS is forecast to expand at a 12.4% CAGR through 2030.
By automation level, modular systems held 51% of the Mining Laboratory Automation market share in 2024, while total lab automation is projected to grow at 14.8% CAGR to 2030.
By mining phase, production and beneficiation accounted for 31% share of the Mining Laboratory Automation market size in 2024; exploration and grade control is advancing at a 13.22% CAGR through 2030.
By geography, Asia-Pacific commanded 31.8% share in 2024, whereas Middle East & Africa posts the fastest 15.22% CAGR to 2030.
By end-user, large enterprises captured 58% of the Mining Laboratory Automation market size in 2024; mid-tier and junior miners represent the fastest-growing user group at 14.21% CAGR.
FLSmidth, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and Bruker collectively held 26% Mining Laboratory Automation market share in 2024, reflecting a moderately fragmented landscape.

Global Mining Laboratory Automation Market Trends and Insights

Drivers Impact Analysis

DRIVER	(~) % IMPACT ON CAGR FORECAST	GEOGRAPHIC RELEVANCE	IMPACT TIMELINE
Digital-first "Pit-to-Port" Sampling Initiatives in Australia	1.8%	Australia, with spillover to Canada and Brazil	Medium term (2-4 years)
Mandatory On-site Assay Turn-around in Chilean Copper Mines	1.5%	Chile, Peru, with adoption in APAC copper operations	Short term (≤ 2 years)
Rapid Grade-Control Needs in West African Gold Super-Pits	1.2%	West Africa, expanding to East Africa and South America	Medium term (2-4 years)
Stricter Tailings-Dam Monitoring Rules in Brazil	0.9%	Brazil, with regulatory spillover to global operations	Long term (≥ 4 years)
Rise of Containerized "Hub-and-Spoke" Labs Across the Nordics	0.7%	Nordic countries, expanding to remote mining regions globally	Long term (≥ 4 years)
AI-Enabled Predictive Maintenance for Robotic Sample Prep	1.4%	Global, with early adoption in Australia and North America	Medium term (2-4 years)

Source: Mordor Intelligence

Digital-first “Pit-to-Port” Sampling Initiatives in Australia

Mining majors now integrate autonomous drills, automated crushers, and robotic fire-assay lines into unified data backbones that push geochemical results into planning software within minutes. Rio Tinto reports annual savings of USD 200 million after deploying predictive maintenance on robotic lab assets, while BHP’s Spence mine in Chile logged three months of full autonomy with zero safety incidents in 2024. Continuous data flow removes manual choke points, cuts contamination risk by 40%, and lifts ore recovery 3–5% in large iron-ore operations.^{[1]BHP Editorial Team, “Artificial Intelligence is unearthing a smarter future,” bhp.com}

Mandatory On-site Assay Turn-around in Chilean Copper Mines

Four-hour regulatory limits for grade-control assays have forced Chilean sites to adopt automated sample preparation and portable XRF units capable of 90-minute results. Codelco’s USD 2.5 billion agreement with ABB bundles electrification and laboratory automation, giving early movers 2–3-point boosts in copper recovery and shaping similar mandates in Peru.^{[2]Mining Digital Staff, “ABB and Codelco Partner on Chilean Mine Decarbonisation,” miningdigital.com}

Rapid Grade-Control Needs in West African Gold Super-Pits

Gold mega-pits have introduced high-throughput robotic labs that process 500+ samples per day. AngloGold Ashanti gained a 650% ROI at Iduapriem by pairing blast-movement monitoring with automated assay workflows, which raised gold recovery 4–6%. Success is spurring similar investments across Ghana, Mali, and Suriname.

AI-Enabled Predictive Maintenance for Robotic Sample Prep

Machine-learning models review vibration and thermal signals to forecast failures 72–96 hours in advance. Gecko Robotics documented 35% less unplanned downtime and 8–12% higher equipment availability at pilot mine sites. Lower maintenance costs accelerate project paybacks and encourage bundled hardware-and-software contracts.

Restraints Impact Analysis

RESTRAINTS	(~) % IMPACT ON CAGR FORECAST	GEOGRAPHIC RELEVANCE	IMPACT TIMELINE
CAPEX Pay-back > 3 Years for Mid-Tier Mines	-1.6%	Global, particularly affecting junior and mid-tier operations	Short term (≤ 2 years)
Limited Inter-operability Between Legacy Assay Hardware	-1.2%	North America and Europe with aging infrastructure	Medium term (2-4 years)
Scarcity of Robotics Technicians in Africa & Caribbeans	-0.8%	Sub-Saharan Africa and Caribbean mining regions	Long term (≥ 4 years)
Data-sovereignty Barriers to Cloud-Hosted LIMS in EU	-0.7%	European Union, with potential spillover to other regions	Medium term (2-4 years)

Source: Mordor Intelligence

CAPEX Pay-back > 3 Years for Mid-Tier Mines

Mid-tier mining operations face significant financial constraints when evaluating laboratory automation investments, as extended payback periods often exceed acceptable risk thresholds for companies with limited capital resources. SRK Consulting's analysis of mining operational costs reveals that automation projects requiring initial investments above USD 5 million typically face scrutiny from boards when payback periods extend beyond 36 months. The challenge is compounded by volatile commodity prices that make long-term ROI calculations unreliable, particularly for gold and base metal operations where price fluctuations can exceed 20% annually. Teck Resources' Quebrada Blanca II project exemplifies this challenge, with development costs escalating to USD 8.5-9 billion significantly above initial estimates, highlighting the risk of cost overruns in major automation initiatives. Equipment financing options and leasing arrangements are emerging as potential solutions, but adoption remains limited due to concerns about technology obsolescence and maintenance responsibilities.

Limited Inter-operability Between Legacy Assay Hardware

The mining industry's substantial installed base of legacy analytical equipment creates significant integration challenges when implementing modern automation systems, as many instruments lack standardized communication protocols required for seamless data exchange. Laboratory information management systems must accommodate dozens of different instrument interfaces, with some facilities operating equipment from 15+ different manufacturers spanning 20+ years of technology evolution. The complexity increases exponentially when attempting to integrate fire assay furnaces, X-ray fluorescence spectrometers, and atomic absorption systems from different eras into unified automated workflows. Retrofit solutions can cost 40-60% of new equipment purchases while delivering only partial functionality, creating difficult capital allocation decisions for mining companies. The emergence of universal communication standards and middleware solutions offers potential relief, but implementation requires significant technical expertise that many mining operations lack internally.

Segment Analysis

By Product: Robotics Accelerate Hazard Reduction

Robotics generated the largest 34.1% slice of the Mining Laboratory Automation market in 2024, underpinned by the need to shield personnel from high-temperature furnaces and carcinogenic dust. Scott Automation’s turnkey cells now deliver crushing, milling, weighing, and fire-assay pouring in sealed environments, lifting throughput and repeatability. LIMS, while smaller, is the fastest climber at 12.4% CAGR, as executives value data integrity and regulatory traceability more than incremental hardware speed. Container labs meet exploration campaigns that require rapid mobilization; one 40-foot module can be on-line within three weeks. Automated analyzers adopt AI-assisted calibration, trimming reagent use and boosting precision.^{[3]Scott Automation Product Group, “Automated Sample Preparation,” scottautomation.com}

Mining Laboratory Automation Market: Market Share by Product Type — Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

By Automation Level: Modular Dominates but TLA Gains Traction

Firms prefer modular islands that replace discrete tasks—crushing, splitting, or fusion—without destabilizing whole workflows. Such systems accounted for 51% of the Mining Laboratory Automation market share in 2024. As payback proof accumulates, total lab automation grows 14.8% per year, particularly in iron-ore and copper hubs where sample volumes are extreme. ABB’s alliance with Agilent to provide integrated robotic-chemistry islands signals a shift toward vendor ecosystems that deliver cradle-to-gate solutions.

By Mining Phase: Production Dominates, Exploration Races Ahead

Production and beneficiation stages consumed 31% of 2024 revenue as operators demand real-time process control to meet contract specs. Exploration and grade control, however, post the 13.22% CAGR headline because complex ore bodies require rapid drill-core analytics. Giant Mining’s deployment of AI-powered geomet modeling before its 2025 drill campaign shows how early geochemical intelligence de-risks later capex.

Mining Laboratory Automation Market: Market Share by Mining Phase — Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

By End-User: Large Enterprises Still Rule

Major diversified miners held 58% of the Mining Laboratory Automation market size in 2024 because they can fund multi-site roll-outs and sustain in-house R&D. Cost declines and leasing models let mid-tier players grow their outlay at 14.21% CAGR. Orexplore’s pay-per-sample gold detection service proves attractive for juniors seeking capital-light exploration.

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific anchored 31.8% of global revenue in 2024, with Australia’s autonomous iron-ore chain and China’s vast base-metal capacity driving demand. Australian robotics spending in mining stood at USD 63 billion in 2022 and is projected to jump to USD 218 billion by 2030, a trend mirrored in laboratory settings. Japan and South Korea supply precision sensors and AI chips that sharpen assay accuracy.

Middle East & Africa records the quickest 15.22% CAGR, catalyzed by sovereign funds. Saudi miner Ma’aden’s tie-up with Hexagon to open the region’s first digital mine—budgeted at USD 2 billion—sets a template for lab automation across phosphate, gold, and copper assets. African deployments lean heavily on container labs and remote monitoring to sidestep weak infrastructure and scarce technicians.

North America shows steady replacement demand as legacy uranium, potash, and precious-metal labs age. Vendors must navigate inter-operability retrofits and unionized labor environments. Europe’s picture is mixed: Nordic iron-ore producers pioneer hub-and-spoke automated labs that support numerous satellite mines, but the wider EU struggles with data-sovereignty hurdles that complicate cloud-based LIMS models. South America benefits from Chile’s assay-turn-around law and Peru’s lithium boom.

Mining Laboratory Automation Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region — Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

The Mining Laboratory Automation market balances between scale incumbents and nimble disrupters. FLSmidth, Bruker, and Thermo Fisher wield global service fleets, integrated analytics suites, and robust after-sales contracts—together capturing 26% share. They solidify positions through retrofit packages that bolt robotics onto legacy instruments. Challenger firms like Chrysos (PhotonAssay) and GeologicAI deliver game-changing non-destructive analysis and AI-core scanning that compress assay lead-times from hours to minutes. Partnership webs multiply: ABB joins Agilent for robotic wet-chemistry cells; ABB also links with Mettler-Toledo’s LabX to overlay weight data onto LIMS, responding to laboratories starved of skilled technicians.

Automation-as-a-service emerges as a battleground. Scott Technology and Intertek pilot outcome-based contracts where miners pay per analyzed sample rather than own equipment outright. Meanwhile, equipment OEMs embed AI-driven predictive maintenance to slash unplanned downtime—a differentiator highlighted by Gecko Robotics’ field results. Sustainability imperatives push vendors to design low-energy fusion furnaces and smart ventilation, addressing stricter tailings analytics and decarbonization metrics.

Mining Laboratory Automation Industry Leaders

FLSmidth A/S
Thermo Fisher Scientific
SGS SA
Intertek Group PLC
Rocklabs (Scott Technology)
*Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order

Mining Laboratory Automation Market Concentration — Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?

Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

May 2025: Sandvik introduced a new autonomous surface drilling solution that shapes the future of drilling operations by improving efficiency and safety in mining environments, representing a significant advancement in surface automation technology.
May 2025: Chrysos Corporation signed its first PhotonAssay unit contract with Newmont, marking a significant milestone in the deployment of advanced analytical technology that promises to revolutionize gold analysis in mining laboratories.
February 2025: ABB and Codelco partnered to implement digital technologies, automation systems, and electrification solutions across Codelco's mining operations in Chile, representing a multi-billion dollar investment in mine decarbonization and laboratory automation.
January 2025: ABB Robotics and Agilent Technologies entered a collaboration to develop automated laboratory solutions that enhance efficiency and flexibility in laboratory operations across various sectors, including mining and mineral processing.

Table of Contents for Mining Laboratory Automation Industry Report

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

4.1 Market Overview
4.2 Market Drivers
- 4.2.1 Digital-first "Pit-to-Port" Sampling Initiatives in Australia
- 4.2.2 Mandatory On-site Assay Turn-around in Chilean Copper Mines
- 4.2.3 Rapid Grade-Control Needs in West African Gold Super-Pits
- 4.2.4 Stricter Tailings-Dam Monitoring Rules in Brazil
- 4.2.5 Rise of Containerized "Hub-and-Spoke" Labs Across the Nordics
- 4.2.6 AI-Enabled Predictive Maintenance for Robotic Sample Prep
4.3 Market Restraints
- 4.3.1 CAPEX Pay-back to 3 Years for Mid-Tier Mines
- 4.3.2 Limited Inter-operability Between Legacy Assay Hardware
- 4.3.3 Scarcity of Robotics Technicians in Africa and Caribbeans
- 4.3.4 Data-sovereignty Barriers to Cloud-Hosted LIMS in EU
4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
4.5 Regulatory Outlook
4.6 Technological Outlook
4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
- 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
- 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
- 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
- 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
- 4.7.5 Competitive Rivalry
4.8 Key Applications
- 4.8.1 Laboratories
- 4.8.2 Mine-site In-Pit Labs
4.9 Major Use-Cases
- 4.9.1 Automated Shift-Based Blast-Hole QA/QC
- 4.9.2 Environmental Baseline and ESG Reporting

5. MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

5.1 By Product
- 5.1.1 Robotics
- 5.1.2 Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS)
- 5.1.3 Container Laboratory
- 5.1.4 Automated Analyzers and Sample Preparation Equipment
5.2 By Automation Level
- 5.2.1 Total Lab Automation (TLA)
- 5.2.2 Modular / Island Automation
5.3 By Mining Phase
- 5.3.1 Exploration and Grade Control
- 5.3.2 Mine Development and Planning
- 5.3.3 Production and Beneficiation
- 5.3.4 Closure and Environmental Monitoring
5.4 By Commodity Processed
- 5.4.1 Iron Ore
- 5.4.2 Copper
- 5.4.3 Gold
- 5.4.4 Coal and Battery Minerals (Ni, Li, Co)
5.5 By Geography
- 5.5.1 North America
- 5.5.1.1 United States
- 5.5.1.2 Canada
- 5.5.1.3 Mexico
- 5.5.2 Europe
- 5.5.2.1 United Kingdom
- 5.5.2.2 Germany
- 5.5.2.3 France
- 5.5.2.4 Italy
- 5.5.2.5 Rest of Europe
- 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
- 5.5.3.1 China
- 5.5.3.2 Japan
- 5.5.3.3 India
- 5.5.3.4 South Korea
- 5.5.3.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
- 5.5.4 Middle East
- 5.5.4.1 Israel
- 5.5.4.2 Saudi Arabia
- 5.5.4.3 United Arab Emirates
- 5.5.4.4 Turkey
- 5.5.4.5 Rest of Middle East
- 5.5.5 Africa
- 5.5.5.1 South Africa
- 5.5.5.2 Egypt
- 5.5.5.3 Rest of Africa
- 5.5.6 South America
- 5.5.6.1 Brazil
- 5.5.6.2 Argentina
- 5.5.6.3 Rest of South America

6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

6.1 Strategic Moves
6.2 Market Share Analysis
6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
- 6.3.1 FLSmidth A/S
- 6.3.2 Bruker Corporation
- 6.3.3 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
- 6.3.4 Intertek Group PLC
- 6.3.5 SGS SA
- 6.3.6 ALS Limited
- 6.3.7 Bureau Veritas SA
- 6.3.8 Rocklabs (SCOTT Technology)
- 6.3.9 HERZOG Automation Corp.
- 6.3.10 Malvern Panalytical Ltd.
- 6.3.11 Nucomat
- 6.3.12 PerkinElmer Inc.
- 6.3.13 Agilent Technologies Inc.
- 6.3.14 Metso Outotec Oyj
- 6.3.15 CEM Corporation
- 6.3.16 Element Materials Technology
- 6.3.17 Online LIMS Canada Ltd.
- 6.3.18 QMetrix Group
- 6.3.19 Sentry Equipment Corp.
- 6.3.20 CITIC Heavy Industries Robotic Lab Systems

7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment

You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections

Get Price Break-up Now

Global Mining Laboratory Automation Market Report Scope

Laboratory automation automates the routine laboratory procedures and the use of dedicated workstations and software, and program instruments, which allows the associate scientists and technicians to deploy their resources and innovations towards experimentation and designing of useful follow-up projects, instead of spending their days performing tasks of tedious repetition. The scope of the study is limited to the deployment of laboratory automation solutions in the mining industry.

By Product	Robotics
	Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS)
	Container Laboratory
	Automated Analyzers and Sample Preparation Equipment
By Automation Level	Total Lab Automation (TLA)
	Modular / Island Automation
By Mining Phase	Exploration and Grade Control
	Mine Development and Planning
	Production and Beneficiation
	Closure and Environmental Monitoring
By Commodity Processed	Iron Ore
	Copper
	Gold
	Coal and Battery Minerals (Ni, Li, Co)

By Geography	North America	United States
		Canada
		Mexico

	Europe	United Kingdom
		Germany
		France
		Italy
		Rest of Europe

	Asia-Pacific	China
		Japan
		India
		South Korea
		Rest of Asia-Pacific

	Middle East	Israel
		Saudi Arabia
		United Arab Emirates
		Turkey
		Rest of Middle East

	Africa	South Africa
		Egypt
		Rest of Africa

	South America	Brazil
		Argentina
		Rest of South America

By Product

Robotics

Laboratory Information Management Systems (LIMS)

Container Laboratory

Automated Analyzers and Sample Preparation Equipment

By Automation Level

Total Lab Automation (TLA)

Modular / Island Automation

By Mining Phase

Exploration and Grade Control

Mine Development and Planning

Production and Beneficiation

Closure and Environmental Monitoring

By Commodity Processed

Iron Ore

Copper

Gold

Coal and Battery Minerals (Ni, Li, Co)

By Geography

North America	United States
	Canada
	Mexico
Europe	United Kingdom
	Germany
	France
	Italy
	Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific	China
	Japan
	India
	South Korea
	Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East	Israel
	Saudi Arabia
	United Arab Emirates
	Turkey
	Rest of Middle East
Africa	South Africa
	Egypt
	Rest of Africa
South America	Brazil
	Argentina
	Rest of South America

Need A Different Region or Segment?

Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the Mining Laboratory Automation market?

The market is valued at USD 7.22 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 11.78 billion by 2030.

Which product segment leads spending today?

Robotics holds the largest 34.1% share, driven by the need to automate hazardous sample-preparation tasks.

Why are containerized laboratories gaining interest?

They offer fully equipped analytical capabilities that can be deployed on-site within weeks, ideal for remote exploration and fast-tracked green-field projects.

Which region is growing fastest?

Middle East & Africa posts the highest 15.22% CAGR, propelled by sovereign wealth fund investments and new digital mines.

How long is the typical payback period for automation projects?

Large operations report 18–24-month paybacks, while mid-tier mines often face periods longer than 3 years unless leasing or service-based models are used.

What role does AI play in laboratory automation?

AI underpins predictive maintenance, real-time data analytics, and advanced image-based ore characterization, reducing downtime and enhancing decision accuracy.

Page last updated on: July 5, 2025