Modular Laboratory Automation Market Size and Share

Modular Laboratory Automation Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Modular Laboratory Automation Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The modular laboratory automation market size is estimated at USD 3.2 billion in 2025 and is set to advance to USD 4.7 billion by 2030, translating to a 6.50% CAGR throughout the forecast window. Heightened regulatory scrutiny, a shrinking laboratory workforce, and the growing need for reproducible data position automated, network-ready work cells as critical infrastructure for life-science innovation. Suppliers now bundle artificial-intelligence software with robotics, allowing laboratories to standardize protocols, capture complete audit trails, and shorten testing cycles. Pharmaceutical manufacturers are accelerating adoption to satisfy the EU GMP Annex 1 contamination-control requirements, while hospital networks favour modular deployments that scale distributed testing without lengthy construction projects. In parallel, federal support such as the NIH MATChS program signals that laboratory automation is no longer discretionary but a strategic enabler for biomedical research.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By equipment & software, automated liquid handlers accounted for 26.41% of the modular laboratory automation market share in 2024; automated storage & retrieval systems are on track for a 7.21% CAGR through 2030.  
  • By field of application, clinical diagnostics held 28.50% revenue share in 2024, while cell & gene therapy workflows are projected to expand at a 9.66% CAGR to 2030.  
  • By end user, pharmaceutical & biotech companies captured 32.20% of the modular laboratory automation market size in 2024; contract research organizations are forecast to grow at an 8.61% CAGR through 2030.  
  • By automation type, modular work cells led with 29.21% revenue share in 2024, whereas mobile/cloud-connected robots are set to grow at a 9.24% CAGR by 2030.  
  • By geography, North America commanded 41.70% of global revenue in 2024; the Asia–Pacific region is the fastest-growing territory through 2030. 

Segment Analysis

By Equipment and Software: Liquid Handlers Drive Market Foundation

Automated liquid handlers generated 26.41% of the modular laboratory automation market size in 2024, cementing their role as the backbone of assay preparation. Laboratories favour these platforms because precision pipetting ensures downstream data quality while freeing staff for analytical tasks. Demand for integrated software that optimizes deck layouts and predicts tip consumption is growing, reducing consumable waste and unplanned downtime. Automated storage & retrieval systems, projected to grow at 7.21% CAGR, solve the chronic challenge of sample archiving by delivering samples to work cells just-in-time. Vendors now combine low-temperature warehouses with AI route planning, minimizing freeze–thaw events and safeguarding biomolecule integrity.  

Software innovation shapes competitive differentiation as vendors embed machine-learning algorithms that flag anomalies before assay failures propagate. Thermo Fisher’s Vulcan platform illustrates how combining robotic arms with self-tuning workflows elevates throughput. Analysers capable of inline mass spectrometry or fluorescence detection compress total turnaround time, letting labs condense multi-day protocols into single shifts. The net effect is a structural rise in demand for cohesive ecosystems rather than single-purpose boxes, reinforcing supplier emphasis on modular laboratory automation market ecosystems that orchestrate hardware and data in one pane of glass. [3]Thermo Fisher Scientific, “Thermo Fisher Scientific Reports First Quarter 2025 Results,” CACLP, en.caclp.com

Modular Laboratory Automation
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Field of Application: Clinical Diagnostics Lead Automation Adoption

Clinical diagnostics contributed 28.50% revenue in 2024, underpinned by high-volume chemistries and strict accreditation criteria that reward reproducible automation. Hospital laboratories integrate conveyor-linked work cells with middleware that posts verified results directly to electronic health records, shortening patient care cycles. Cell & gene therapy workflows, forecast for 9.66% CAGR, need closed-system robots that minimize contamination risk during lengthy culture periods. Robots equipped with environmental sensors and AI classifiers maintain sub-micron cleanliness, preventing batch failures that could cost millions of USD.  

Drug-discovery groups continue to deploy high-throughput screens on 1,536-well plates, while genomics consortia automate library prep for population cohorts. Proteomics is emerging as laboratories automate sample digestion and LC-MS loading. Cross-disciplinary platforms that support reagent-agnostic protocols are gaining traction, as they let sites pivot capacity between diagnostic, discovery, and manufacturing workloads. This versatility reinforces investment in the modular laboratory automation market because a single capital outlay serves many revenue streams. 

By End User: Pharmaceutical & Biotech Companies Anchor Market Demand

Pharmaceutical and biotech firms captured 32.20% of 2024 spending, driven by regulatory obligations for data integrity and the need to compress development timelines. High-throughput biology paired with electronic batch records accelerates IND submissions and reduces failure risk in late-stage trials. CROs, expanding at an 8.61% CAGR, deploy flexible automation that handles client-specific methods without long validation cycles. Their purchasing power incentivizes vendors to standardize plug-ins that swap liquid classes and deck configurations in minutes.  

Academic institutes adopt modular work cells to stretch limited grants yet still meet peer-review expectations for reproducibility. Clinical laboratories, pressured by test-volume growth and workforce gaps, use pre-analytical robots that decamp tubes and aliquot specimens automatically. Food and environmental laws require ruggedized systems that resist acidic or particulate-laden samples; this niche sustains a specialized subset within the modular laboratory automation market, often delivered as compact benchtop units. 

Modular Laboratory Automation Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Automation Type: Modular Work cells Balance Flexibility and Integration

Modular work cells accounted for 29.21% of revenue in 2024, validating the premise that stepwise deployment balances cost and capability. Laboratories often start with a liquid-handling core, add plate movers, then integrate analytics as volumes scale. Mobile or cloud-connected robots, expected to expand at a 9.24% CAGR, traverse multiple benches and share resources across departments, making capital use more efficient. Their onboard cameras support remote service diagnostics, a feature valued in geographically dispersed networks.  

Standalone instrument automation remains relevant where single-analysis precision outweighs throughput. Integrated work cells deliver linear sample paths ideal for reference laboratories with predictable demand curves. Total laboratory automation lines occupy the premium tier; although costly, they virtually eliminate human touch points, achieving the highest possible workflow velocity. Regardless of configuration, security-hardened firmware and role-based access control are now standard, reflecting cybersecurity expectations in the modular laboratory automation market. 

Geography Analysis

North America sustained a 41.70% revenue share in 2024, reflecting the concentration of biopharmaceutical headquarters, generous NIH funding, and a mature regulatory environment that favours technology investments. Recent federal grants, such as the USD 2.15 million MATChS award, confirm public-sector endorsement of intelligent automation. Tier-1 hospitals are integrating decentralized work cells, pushing specimen processing closer to patient intake to reduce logistics delays. Canada’s life-science clusters leverage provincial tax credits to upgrade research infrastructure, though staffing shortages remain acute; automation therefore offers a pragmatic path to maintain throughput despite limited headcount. Mexico, seeking export accreditation for sterile injectables, is piloting robotic isolators to meet Annex 1 requirements and secure contract manufacturing deals. [4]National Institutes of Health, “Miniaturization and Automation of Tissue Chip Systems (MATChS),” National Institutes of Health, grants.nih.gov

Asia–Pacific registers the highest growth trajectory as governments subsidize biotech infrastructure and encourage local manufacturing of advanced therapies. China invests in national sequencing hubs that adopt fully automated, closed-loop pipelines, reducing per-genome costs and accelerating precision-medicine pilot programs. Japan’s aging population elevates demand for diagnostic automation capable of handling chronic-disease panels. India’s contract-manufacturing sector implements modular isolators that comply with global sterility standards, positioning domestic plants for regulated-market exports. South Korea focuses on cell-therapy centers of excellence that combine dual-arm robots with AI analytics, bringing complex biologics to market more swiftly. Collectively, these initiatives underpin sustained demand across the modular laboratory automation market throughout the region. 

Europe remains a pivotal market because Annex 1 lifts technical barriers in favour of robotics, driving upgrades across legacy fill-finish lines. Germany’s engineering base integrates high-precision mechatronics with cloud-native MES platforms, while the United Kingdom channels research funding into university-hospital partnerships that validate AI-directed work cells. France modernizes public-sector laboratories through stimulus packages that offset upfront capex. Italy and Spain prioritize total laboratory automation in blood-bank operations to curb transfusion errors. The regulatory commonality across the European Economic Area encourages cross-border standardization, letting suppliers offer uniform validation packages and thereby expedite procurement across multiple sites within the modular laboratory automation market. 

Transportation Management System
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The modular laboratory automation market shows moderate consolidation; the top three suppliers hold substantial but not monopolistic positions. Thermo Fisher integrates robotics, consumables, and cloud software into turnkey offerings, as reflected in its USD 10.36 billion Q1 2025 revenue. Danaher advances AI-assisted workflows that predict assay failures and auto-correct pipetting parameters, shielding clients from costly reruns. Tecan leverages open-API policies to foster third-party ecosystem growth, a key attraction for institutes blending legacy instruments with new automation. 

Strategic acquisitions intensify competition. Siemens’ USD 5.1 billion purchase of Dotmatics injects AI LIMS capabilities that converge design, execution, and data analytics under one roof. Grifols teams with Inpeco to unveil FlexLab X, bringing transfusion medicine into the era of open automation. QuidelOrtho pursues rapid molecular diagnostics that dovetail with existing chemistry-analyser fleets, expanding footprint without fresh floor-space commitments. Start-ups differentiate through mobile robotics and service-based pricing, appealing to mid-tier labs that resist heavy capital outlays. 

Cybersecurity emerges as a new battleground. Vendors harden firmware, embed encrypted communications, and offer SOC-as-a-service to reassure regulated industries. Ecosystem partnerships also matter; consumables suppliers co-design reagent kits optimized for specific robot platforms, locking in recurring revenue. In this environment, vendor ability to deliver validated, end-to-end solutions will determine share capture within the modular laboratory automation market over the next five years. 

Modular Laboratory Automation Industry Leaders

  1. Thermo Fisher Scientific

  2. Danaher (Beckman Coulter)

  3. Tecan Group AG

  4. Agilent Technologies

  5. Hamilton Company

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Danaher Corporation, Becton Dickinson, Siemens Healthcare, Synchron Lab Automation, Honeywell International Inc., Perkinelmer Inc.
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • June 2025: QuidelOrtho Corporation announced its plan to acquire LEX Diagnostics after FDA clearance, expanding point-of-care molecular testing portfolios that integrate seamlessly with automated lab workflows.
  • May 2025: Thermo Fisher Scientific completed the USD 4.1 billion acquisition of Solventum’s Purification & Filtration business to broaden sample-preparation automation.
  • April 2025: Siemens AG acquired Dotmatics for USD 5.1 billion to enhance AI-driven software suites that unify laboratory data pipelines.
  • March 2025: Astellas Pharma and YASKAWA Electric formed a joint venture to develop dual-arm robot systems for precision cell-therapy manufacturing.

Table of Contents for Modular Laboratory Automation Industry Report

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Rising need for reproducibility and data integrity
    • 4.2.2 Chronic skilled-labor shortages in life-science labs
    • 4.2.3 High-throughput genomics and cell-therapy pipelines
    • 4.2.4 EU GMP Annex 1 contamination-control mandates accelerating robotics (under-reported)
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 High upfront capex and long ROI cycles
    • 4.3.2 Integration complexity with legacy instruments and LIMS
  • 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 5.1 By Equipment and Software
    • 5.1.1 Automated Liquid Handlers
    • 5.1.2 Automated Plate Handlers
    • 5.1.3 Robotic Arms
    • 5.1.4 Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (ASRS)
    • 5.1.5 Analyzers
    • 5.1.6 Software
  • 5.2 By Field of Application
    • 5.2.1 Drug Discovery
    • 5.2.2 Genomics
    • 5.2.3 Proteomics
    • 5.2.4 Clinical Diagnostics
    • 5.2.5 Other Applications
  • 5.3 By End User
    • 5.3.1 Pharmaceutical and Biotech Companies
    • 5.3.2 Academic and Research Institutes
    • 5.3.3 Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratories
    • 5.3.4 Contract Research Organisations
    • 5.3.5 Food and Environmental Testing Labs
  • 5.4 By Automation Type
    • 5.4.1 Standalone Instrument Automation
    • 5.4.2 Modular Workcells
    • 5.4.3 Integrated Workcells
    • 5.4.4 Total Laboratory Automation (TLA) Lines
    • 5.4.5 Mobile/Cloud-connected Robots
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.2 Germany
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Russia
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 Japan
    • 5.5.4.3 India
    • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.4.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.5 Middle East
    • 5.5.5.1 Israel
    • 5.5.5.2 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.3 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.5.5.4 Turkey
    • 5.5.5.5 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.5.6 Africa
    • 5.5.6.1 South Africa
    • 5.5.6.2 Egypt
    • 5.5.6.3 Rest of Africa

6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Thermo Fisher Scientific
    • 6.4.2 Danaher Corporation (Beckman Coulter)
    • 6.4.3 Tecan Group AG
    • 6.4.4 Agilent Technologies
    • 6.4.5 PerkinElmer Inc.
    • 6.4.6 Siemens Healthineers
    • 6.4.7 Becton Dickinson (BD)
    • 6.4.8 Hudson Robotics Inc.
    • 6.4.9 Honeywell International Inc.
    • 6.4.10 Hamilton Company
    • 6.4.11 HighRes Biosolutions
    • 6.4.12 Biosero Inc.
    • 6.4.13 QIAGEN N.V.
    • 6.4.14 Copan Diagnostics
    • 6.4.15 Retisoft Inc.
    • 6.4.16 Bruker (Chemspeed)
    • 6.4.17 Roche Diagnostics
    • 6.4.18 ABB Ltd.
    • 6.4.19 LabVantage Solutions
    • 6.4.20 Festo AG and Co. KG

7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the modular laboratory automation market as the sale of discrete, factory-built workcells, robotic arms, automated liquid or plate handlers, storage and retrieval modules, and orchestration software that slot into existing benches to automate selected workflow steps without requiring a full conveyor-based total-lab line.

(Scope Exclusion) Stand-alone benchtop readers, pure-play LIMS platforms, and end-to-end TLA tracks lie outside this assessment.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Equipment and Software
    • Automated Liquid Handlers
    • Automated Plate Handlers
    • Robotic Arms
    • Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (ASRS)
    • Analyzers
    • Software
  • By Field of Application
    • Drug Discovery
    • Genomics
    • Proteomics
    • Clinical Diagnostics
    • Other Applications
  • By End User
    • Pharmaceutical and Biotech Companies
    • Academic and Research Institutes
    • Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratories
    • Contract Research Organisations
    • Food and Environmental Testing Labs
  • By Automation Type
    • Standalone Instrument Automation
    • Modular Workcells
    • Integrated Workcells
    • Total Laboratory Automation (TLA) Lines
    • Mobile/Cloud-connected Robots
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • United Kingdom
      • Germany
      • France
      • Italy
      • Russia
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East
      • Israel
      • Saudi Arabia
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Turkey
      • Rest of Middle East
    • Africa
      • South Africa
      • Egypt
      • Rest of Africa

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Desk Research

We started with open statistics from UN Comtrade, FDA 510(k) device clearances, EMA guidance notes, and adoption surveys published by the International Society for Automation. We then layered in patent counts from Questel and production snapshots in peer-reviewed journals such as Nature Methods. Company 10-Ks, capital expenditure transcripts, and reputable press helped map investment cycles and typical module prices. Paid repositories, including D&B Hoovers for revenue splits and Dow Jones Factiva for shipment news, rounded out vendor intelligence. The sources named illustrate our approach; many other public and subscription inputs informed data collection and consistency checks.

Primary Research

Mordor analysts interviewed automation engineers at hospital labs, process development scientists in pharma, regional distributors in East Asia, and procurement heads at CROs. These conversations clarified real-world throughput limits, utilization patterns, and buying triggers, allowing us to reconcile divergent viewpoints through follow-up surveys.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down build of installed base replacement cycles, high-throughput sample volumes, and laboratory capital budgets produced the initial pool. Selective bottom-up shipment checks, sampled ASP multiplied by volume, validated and adjusted totals. Key variables include global pharma R&D spend, the count of CLIA-certified labs, median liquid handler ASP erosion, uptake of cell and gene therapy assays, and regional skilled labor shortages. Multivariate regression with scenario analysis generated 2026 to 2030 forecasts, while gaps in distributor data were bridged with weighted regional averages.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Before release, our team runs variance tests against vendor order backlogs, import codes, and currency shifts. Anomalies trigger re-contact of subject matter experts. Models refresh annually, with interim updates for material events, ensuring clients receive the latest view.

Why Mordor's Modular Laboratory Automation Baseline Commands Reliability

Published estimates often diverge because firms apply different module baskets, price assumptions, and calendar cut-offs. Our disciplined scope alignment and yearly bottom-up sense checks keep the baseline steady.

Key gap drivers include narrower geography coverage by some publishers, exclusion of coordinating software in others, and static ASP use that ignores rapid robotics price deflation.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 3.20 B (2025) Mordor Intelligence
USD 2.50 B (2025) Global Consultancy A Omits software modules and South America, lowering totals
USD 3.20 B (2024) Trade Journal B Uses 2024 exchange rates and excludes distributor mark-ups

The comparison shows that, once scope, geography, and pricing are normalized, Mordor's 2025 figure provides a balanced, transparent baseline that decision-makers can trace back to clear variables and repeatable steps.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the modular laboratory automation market?

The modular laboratory automation market stands at USD 3.2 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 4.7 billion by 2030.

Which segment holds the largest share of the modular laboratory automation market?

Automated liquid handlers lead with 26.41% revenue share, reflecting their central role in most laboratory workflows.

Why are pharmaceutical companies investing heavily in modular laboratory automation systems?

Pharmaceutical firms need reproducible data, regulatory compliance, and accelerated development timelines; modular automation delivers these benefits while supporting high-throughput screening and sterile manufacturing requirements.

How do EU GMP Annex 1 requirements influence automation purchasing decisions?

The revised guideline favours robotic isolators and continuous monitoring, prompting European and global manufacturers to invest in automation that ensures contamination control.

What financial barriers do smaller laboratories face when adopting automation?

Upfront capital costs can exceed USD 1 million, and ROI may extend beyond three years, making leasing or phased deployment attractive alternatives.

How are cybersecurity concerns addressed in networked laboratory robots?

Vendors embed encrypted communications, role-based access controls, and offer security-operations-center services to mitigate unauthorized access risks in connected automation systems.

Page last updated on:

Modular Laboratory Automation Report Snapshots