Military Unmanned Ground Vehicle Market Size and Share

Military Unmanned Ground Vehicle Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Military Unmanned Ground Vehicle Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The military UGV market size stands at USD 1.96 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 2.87 billion by 2030, reflecting a 7.92% CAGR over the forecast period. Strong demand for autonomous platforms that protect soldiers from improvised explosive devices, munitions fragments, and small-arms fire anchors presents revenue opportunities. Rapid advances in artificial intelligence, sensor fusion, and edge computing expand mission profiles from reconnaissance to combat logistics. Heightened geopolitical risk in Eastern Europe and the Indo-Pacific drives urgent procurement cycles, while the growing feasibility of manned–unmanned teaming reshapes tactical doctrine. Competitive intensity remains moderate as prime contractors rely on classified integration skills, yet specialized robotics firms inject innovation through partnerships focused on electronic-warfare (EW)-resilient autonomy.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By application, explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) held 44.5% of the military UGV market share in 2024; intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) is poised to grow at a 10.22% CAGR through 2030.
  • By mobility platform, tracked systems led with 59.65% share in 2024, while wheeled platforms are forecasted to expand at an 8.35% CAGR to 2030.
  • By mode of operation, tele-operated vehicles accounted for 68.98% share in 2024, whereas semi-autonomous platforms will advance at an 8.39% CAGR during the outlook period.
  • By weight class, small systems dominated with a 44.5% share in 2024, and medium systems are projected to register a 9.43% CAGR up to 2030.
  • By geography, North America captured 38.63% revenue in 2024; Europe is anticipated to record an 8.42% CAGR through 20300

Segment Analysis

By Application: EOD Leads While ISR Accelerates

Explosive ordnance disposal (EOD) platforms generated 44.50% revenue in 2024 as militaries prioritized remote neutralization of improvised explosives during asymmetric engagements. This dominance persists because small tracked robots consistently navigate rubble and deliver precise disruptor charges that save technicians’ lives in trench networks and urban ruins. Meanwhile, the intelligence segment expands fastest at a 10.22% CAGR as commanders request persistent video and electronic surveillance that a single soldier cannot sustain. ISR robots equipped with mast-mounted optics and low-probability-of-intercept radios provide continuous feeds that fuse into broader command networks, reducing surprise contacts.

Demand for combat robots accompanying infantry grows as manned formations test tactics such as robotic point men that trigger ambushes before troops enter chokepoints. Logistics and resupply variants also gain traction because autonomous trailers and pallet movers eliminate vulnerable driver positions during long convoys. Engineering and route-clearance models benefit from ruggedized blades and roller kits that protect sappers from suspected minefields. Training and decoy applications, though smaller, enable realistic threat emulation that hones soldier readiness and validates EW countermeasures.

Military Unmanned Ground Vehicle Market: Market Share by Application
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Mode of Operation: Human Control Prevails Yet Autonomy Grows

Tele-operated vehicles held 68.98% market presence in 2024 because policymakers insist that lethal decisions remain under direct human judgment. Real-time video, haptic feedback, and low-latency satellite relays maintain commander confidence during bomb disposal or sentry roles. Semi-autonomous suites, however, record an 8.39% CAGR as algorithms handle waypoint navigation and obstacle avoidance, freeing operators to focus on mission objectives.

When communication is denied, the military UGV market welcomes the gradual integration of fully autonomous behaviors such as convoy following and casualty evacuation. Developers embed ethical guardrails consistent with Department of Defense (DoD) AI principles to mitigate policy resistance. Each incremental software upgrade lifts crew workload and lowers exposure to sniper fire, nurturing enduring adoption momentum.

By Mobility Platform: Tracked Strength Balances Wheeled Momentum

Tracked chassis captured 59.65% of shipments in 2024 because they traverse mud, rubble, and soft sand with a dependable grip. Heavy payload ratings let forces mount counter-IED arms, light cannons, and bridge-laying kits without compromising stability, which preserves the appeal of tracked options despite higher maintenance. The military UGV market size for tracked platforms is forecasted to widen steadily through 2030 as high-threat theaters demand survivability.

Wheeled robots, advancing at 8.35% CAGR, capitalize on fuel efficiency and rapid road speeds when moving supplies between forward operating bases. Hybrid drivetrains that switch between wheel and track modules surface, but complexity tempers adoption for now. Legged concepts progress within research units for cave mapping and stair climbing, though limited payload capacity confines near-term roles. Platform selection increasingly aligns with mission tempo rather than blanket fleet standardization.

Military Unmanned Ground Vehicle Market: Market Share by Mobility Platform
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Weight Class: Small Platforms Dominate but Medium Platforms Surge

Robots between 25 kg and 200 kg accounted for 44.50% shipments in 2024 because unit leaders can hand-carry them from armored personnel carriers directly into alleys or culverts. Micro robots under 25 kg excel in discreet reconnaissance of subterranean passages where tunnels constrain heavier systems.

Medium robots in the 200 to 1,000 kg band grow fastest at 9.43% CAGR as armies demand longer endurance, heavier manipulator arms, and modular sensor bays. The military UGV market size for medium platforms is set to rise, propelled by programs that pair them with crewed vehicles in combined arms formations. Heavy robots exceeding 1,000 kg find specialized niches in breaching fortifications and transporting pallets, but face airlift restrictions that slow fleetwide proliferation.

Geography Analysis

North America generated 38.63% of 2024 revenue because the Pentagon underwrites multi-service robotics portfolios and primes such as General Dynamics and Textron maintain mature production lines. Operational use in Afghanistan, Iraq, and rotational deployments in Europe yields battlefield data that feeds iterative upgrades, consolidating regional leadership.

Europe is the fastest-expanding theater with an 8.42% CAGR through 2030 as governments react to near-peer deterrence requirements. The European Defence Fund has committed EUR 8 billion (USD 9.32 billion) to autonomous projects, stimulating consortia that integrate German automotive robotics and French sensor payloads into interoperable fleets. The UK’s Future Soldier program dedicates GBP 6.6 billion (USD 8.85 billion) to next-generation combat systems, including robotic wingmen, anchoring long-term demand.

Asia-Pacific nations accelerate procurement under regional security tensions. China leverages military-civil fusion to convert commercial robotics breakthroughs into armored reconnaissance drones that patrol border outposts. India’s Make in India policy funds indigenous crawler designs aimed at mountainous terrain, while Australia applies AUKUS partnerships to fast-track sovereign production of unmanned logistics carriers. Collectively, these dynamics elevate regional share in the military UGV market and diversify supply chains away from single-region concentration.

Military Unmanned Ground Vehicle Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The market remains moderately consolidated because high reliability, cyber-hardening, and export-control compliance reward incumbents with security clearances. General Dynamics Land Systems, Rheinmetall, and BAE Systems field integrated vehicle families that align with established armored fleets, reducing crew retraining burdens. Contract wins such as the USD 1.2 billion Robotic Combat Vehicle-Light deal exemplify the scale advantages that incumbents wield.

Yet technological velocity creates openings for more miniature robotics and AI specialists. Firms like Milrem Robotics supply open-architecture chassis that prime customization with national subsystems, while cloud-native developers contribute perception stacks that mature faster than traditional waterfall models. Partnerships proliferate, blending defense-grade encryption and safety certification with agile software release cycles.

Competitive strategies emphasize electronic-warfare resilience, modular mission payloads, and dual-use humanitarian applications that justify peacetime budgets. Companies positioning early in mesh networking and swarm orchestration accumulate differentiators that complicate commoditization. Overall rivalry strengthens product quality without triggering price wars, sustaining profitable margins across the military UGV industry.

Military Unmanned Ground Vehicle Industry Leaders

  1. Rheinmetall AG

  2. L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

  3. Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.

  4. Teledyne FLIR LLC (Teledyne Technologies Incorporated)

  5. QinetiQ Group plc

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Picture1.png
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • March 2025: Through its Telerob unit, AeroVironment secured a contract to deliver 41 advanced EOD UGVs to the German Armed Forces.
  • March 2025: AeroVironment secured a landmark contract with the German Armed Forces, marking a significant milestone in the EOD UGV landscape. The deal involves the provision of 41 Telemax HT300 advanced UGVs, designed explicitly for EOD and counter-IED operations.
  • September 2024: Kodiak introduced the RIPSAW M3 tracked vehicle for reconnaissance and tactical roles, validating dual-use technology in Robotic Combat Vehicle trials.

Table of Contents for Military Unmanned Ground Vehicle Industry Report

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Expanding defence budgets among the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and Indo-Pacific nations
    • 4.2.2 Soldier-safety focus driving autonomous combat/logistics platforms
    • 4.2.3 AI-enabled sensor-fusion and autonomous navigation breakthroughs
    • 4.2.4 Manned–unmanned teaming doctrine in multi-domain operations
    • 4.2.5 Electronic warfare (EW)-resilient ground relay nodes demand
    • 4.2.6 Climate-disaster engineering missions creating dual-use demand
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Cyber-/jamming vulnerability of Command and Control (C2) links
    • 4.3.2 High acquisition and life-cycle cost vs manned vehicles
    • 4.3.3 Arms-control ambiguity over lethal autonomy
    • 4.3.4 Lack of cross-allied interoperability standards
  • 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter’s Five Forces
    • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 5.1 By Application
    • 5.1.1 Combat
    • 5.1.2 Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR)
    • 5.1.3 Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD)
    • 5.1.4 Logistics and Resupply
    • 5.1.5 Engineering and Route Clearance
    • 5.1.6 Training and Decoy
  • 5.2 By Mobility Platform
    • 5.2.1 Wheeled
    • 5.2.2 Tracked
    • 5.2.3 Legged
    • 5.2.4 Hybrid
  • 5.3 By Mode of Operation
    • 5.3.1 Tele-operated
    • 5.3.2 Autonomous
    • 5.3.2.1 Semi-Autonomous
    • 5.3.2.2 Fully Autonomous
  • 5.4 By Weight Class
    • 5.4.1 Micro (Less than 25 kg)
    • 5.4.2 Small (25 to 200 kg)
    • 5.4.3 Medium (200 to 1000 kg)
    • 5.4.4 Heavy (More than 1000 kg)
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.2 France
    • 5.5.2.3 Germany
    • 5.5.2.4 Italy
    • 5.5.2.5 Russia
    • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 India
    • 5.5.3.3 Japan
    • 5.5.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.5 Australia
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 South America
    • 5.5.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.4.2 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
    • 5.5.5.1.1 Israel
    • 5.5.5.1.2 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.1.3 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.5.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.5.5.2 Africa
    • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
    • 5.5.5.2.2 Rest of Africa

6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 General Dynamics Land Systems
    • 6.4.2 Rheinmetall AG
    • 6.4.3 KNDS N.V.
    • 6.4.4 Oshkosh Corporation
    • 6.4.5 L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
    • 6.4.6 ASELSAN A.Ş.
    • 6.4.7 QinetiQ Group plc
    • 6.4.8 Milrem Robotics (Milrem AS)
    • 6.4.9 Roboteam Holdings Ltd.
    • 6.4.10 Teledyne FLIR LLC (Teledyne Technologies Incorporated)
    • 6.4.11 Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
    • 6.4.12 BAE Systems plc
    • 6.4.13 Textron Inc.
    • 6.4.14 HDT Global
    • 6.4.15 Elbit Systems Ltd.
    • 6.4.16 Peraton Corp.
    • 6.4.17 Hanwha Aerospace (Hanwha Corporation)
    • 6.4.18 Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd
    • 6.4.19 FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.Ş.
    • 6.4.20 Hyundai Rotem Company
    • 6.4.21 Iveco Defence Vehicles (Iveco Group N.V.)

7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study classifies the military unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) market as all new, tracked, wheeled, legged, or hybrid robotic platforms that are procured, trialed, or funded by defense ministries for combat, reconnaissance, logistics, route-clearance, or training missions, together with their embedded autonomy kits and mission payloads. Platforms intended solely for civilian security, mining, or agriculture are outside this scope.

Scope exclusion: commercial and law-enforcement UGVs, automated guided vehicles, and legacy remotely controlled bomb-disposal robots are not modeled.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Application
    • Combat
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR)
    • Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD)
    • Logistics and Resupply
    • Engineering and Route Clearance
    • Training and Decoy
  • By Mobility Platform
    • Wheeled
    • Tracked
    • Legged
    • Hybrid
  • By Mode of Operation
    • Tele-operated
    • Autonomous
      • Semi-Autonomous
      • Fully Autonomous
  • By Weight Class
    • Micro (Less than 25 kg)
    • Small (25 to 200 kg)
    • Medium (200 to 1000 kg)
    • Heavy (More than 1000 kg)
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
    • Europe
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Germany
      • Italy
      • Russia
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • India
      • Japan
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Rest of South America
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Middle East
        • Israel
        • Saudi Arabia
        • United Arab Emirates
        • Rest of Middle East
      • Africa
        • South Africa
        • Rest of Africa

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Mordor analysts interviewed procurement officers, retired armor corps commanders, robotics program managers, and integrators across North America, Europe, Israel, South Korea, and Australia. These conversations tested adoption timelines, learning curve cost reductions, and likely sustainment ratios, letting us adjust secondary data before final triangulation.

Desk Research

We relied on open defense data sets such as SIPRI military expenditure tables, NATO and U.S. DoD budget justifications, UNROCA equipment transfer logs, and patent filings that flag emerging autonomy algorithms. Trade association white papers from entities such as the Association of the United States Army, plus parliamentary committee transcripts that disclose unit procurement costs, further anchored baseline unit counts. To refine company revenue splits, we accessed paid databases including D&B Hoovers for financials, Dow Jones Factiva for program announcements, and Global Security for platform specifications. Additional inputs came from annual reports, SEC 10-Ks, and open-source battlefield imagery that confirms platform fielding. This list is illustrative; many other secondary sources were reviewed to validate numbers and close information gaps.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

We begin with a top-down reconstruction of defense capital expenditure lines earmarked for UGVs, adjust for contract cancellations, and then validate totals with selective bottom-up roll-ups of announced unit orders multiplied by average selling price snapshots shared during interviews. Key model variables include unit acquisition cost curves, defense R&D intensity, platform weight class mix shifts, autonomy software uptake, and average fleet replacement cycles. A multivariate regression links these drivers to historical spending and projects demand through 2030; scenario analysis captures surges tied to emergent conflict zones. Where supplier roll-ups lack data, allocation keys derived from program milestone outlays plug the gaps.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs flow through anomaly checks against import-export logs and public contract disclosures, followed by peer review from a second analyst. Reports refresh every twelve months, with interim updates triggered by material contract awards; a final validation step occurs just before client delivery.

Why Mordor's Military Unmanned Ground Vehicle Baseline Commands Reliability

Published estimates often diverge because firms vary in scope, count prototypes differently, or roll service revenues into hardware sales.

Key gap drivers include the inclusion of civil robots, the choice of 2024 versus 2025 as a base year, unchecked currency conversions, and whether canceled prototypes are still tallied. By restricting scope to funded military programs, aligning currencies to constant 2025 dollars, and refreshing data annually, Mordor delivers a cleaner, decision-ready baseline.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 2.20 B (2025) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 3.58 B (2025) Global Consultancy A Blends military and commercial fleets; adds multi-year MRO revenues
USD 3.10 B (2024) Trade Journal B Uses earlier year baseline and counts demonstrator prototypes

These comparisons show that once differing scopes and add-ons are stripped away, Mordor's disciplined variable selection and yearly refresh cadence provide the most transparent and reproducible view for planners.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

How large is the military unmanned ground vehicle market in 2025?

The military UGV market is valued at USD 1.96 billion in 2025 and is forecasted to reach USD 2.87 billion by 2030.

Which application currently generates the highest revenue?

EOD platforms lead with 44.5% of 2024 revenue.

What is the fastest-growing mobility platform category?

Wheeled systems are projected to grow at an 8.35% CAGR through 2030.

Why are semi-autonomous modes gaining popularity?

Advances in AI reduce operator workload and allow vehicles to navigate and avoid obstacles without constant remote control, supporting an 8.39% CAGR for semi-autonomous systems.

Which region shows the fastest future growth?

Europe is expected to register an 8.42% CAGR to 2030 as defense budgets rise and European Defence Fund projects mature.

What is the primary restraint on market expansion?

Vulnerability to cyber and jamming attacks limits operational confidence and slows the transition from tele-operated to fully autonomous missions.

Page last updated on:

Military Unmanned Ground Vehicle Report Snapshots