Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Market Size and Share

Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The military unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) market size stood at USD 15.63 billion in 2025 and is forecasted to reach USD 27.42 billion by 2030, advancing at an 11.90% CAGR as armed forces embed uncrewed systems deep into force-structure plans. The military UAV market has entered a new phase as defense planners weave uncrewed aircraft into core force-structure blueprints. Current doctrine prizes airframes that survive dense air-defense zones, pass data across secure networks, and deploy in numbers large enough to stretch enemy interceptors. Such priorities have attracted fresh public funding, best illustrated by the US Department of Defense’s Replicator initiative, which fast-tracks low-cost, autonomous, and ultimately expendable drones into service. Fixed-wing models still anchor most fleets thanks to their range and loiter endurance, yet hybrid VTOL designs are gaining momentum because they can launch from confined areas where runways are absent. Growing acceptance that some vehicles must be sacrificed in high-threat battles is also fuelling demand for “attritable” systems that can absorb losses without derailing the mission. Meanwhile, miniaturised avionics now support swarming micro-drones that act cooperatively, even as larger platforms remain indispensable for long-haul, heavy-payload assignments. Uncrewed aerial logistics has emerged as another vital use case after war games exposed vulnerability in traditional resupply routes during high-intensity operations.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By platform type, fixed-wing systems led with 80.50% revenue share in 2024, while hybrid VTOL posted the fastest 13.25% CAGR through 2030.
  • By payload weight, large UAVs (more than 600 kg) accounted for 53.40% of the military UAV market share in 2024; nano/micro craft (less than 2 kg) are forecasted to expand at 14.20% CAGR to 2030.
  • By propulsion, internal combustion engines held 78.60% share of the military UAV market size in 2024, whereas fuel-cell solutions are projected to grow at 15.35% CAGR.
  • By application, ISR dominated with a 57.87% share in 2024; logistics and resupply are advancing at a 14.50% CAGR through 2030.
  • By geography, North America captured a 42.20% share in 2024, while the Middle East and Africa region is expected to post the strongest 12.65% CAGR to 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Platform Type: Fixed-Wing Dominance Faces Hybrid Disruption

Fixed-wing craft generated 80.50% of 2024 revenue, confirming their primacy for high-altitude, long-endurance sorties that underpin theater ISR and precision strike. Hybrid VTOL airframes, however, hold the strongest 13.25% expansion pace thanks to Northrop Grumman’s XRQ-73, which marries electric lift fans with a cruise propulsor for longer range. Defense ministries recognized that such configurations launch from confined decks yet deliver fixed-wing endurance, making them attractive for expeditionary forces. Israel Aerospace Industries’ APUS 25 achieved six-hour flights with a heavy-fuel engine that burns the same JP-8 stocked for manned aircraft, facilitating field logistics.

The platform mix also evolves under MUM-T doctrines that assign different risk profiles to each type. Fixed-wing CCAs pair with fighters for stand-in jamming or weapons carriage, while rotary and hybrid airframes support urban assault, vertical resupply, or ship-based launch. Surge demand from amphibious forces and special operations units to land supplies on remote littorals reinforces hybrid take-off advantages. These shifts will keep the military UAV market platform landscape fluid through 2030 as procurement agencies balance endurance, survivability, and basing flexibility.

Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles  Share by Platform Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Payload Weight Class: Nano/Micro Surge Challenges Heavy-Lift Hegemony

Large airframes exceeding 600 kg preserved 53.40% of 2024 spending, reflecting their capacity to carry SAR radars, SIGINT suites, and multi-effect weapons. Still, the sub-2 kg nano/micro cohort is projected to outpace all classes at 14.20% CAGR and could carve a double-digit share by 2030. The US Army added Teledyne FLIR’s 70-gram Black Hornet 4 to its Blue UAS roster, pushing military UAV market share for nano systems higher. Such pocket drones feed live video to squad leaders, increasing platoon lethality without adding logistical burden.

Swarm tactics drive numbers rather than individual platform margin. Research teams achieved autonomous flight on 78.4 mg avionics boards consuming only 15 mW, opening a path to insect-scale scouts.[3]Source: S. Tanveer, “TinySense Autonomous Avionics,” arxiv.org On the other hand, heavy craft like General Atomics’ MQ-9B keep aircraft-grade architectures for persistent coverage where air dominance exists. The coexistence of multi-ton ISR trucks and palm-size scouts exemplifies the bifurcation of the military UAV market into high-value and high-volume segments.

By Propulsion Type: Fuel Cells Disrupt Internal-Combustion Supremacy

Internal-combustion engines retained 78.60% share in 2024, given proven reliability and established depot tooling. Yet hybrid powertrains and hydrogen fuel cells headline new procurement. The military UAV market size tied to fuel-cell platforms is anticipated to grow at a 15.35% CAGR through 2030 2030 as endurance tests surpass 24 hours. Skyeton’s Raybird demonstrator logged 15-hour hydrogen flights with full payload, highlighted by Ukraine for border patrol missions. The Naval Research Laboratory earlier flew the Ion Tiger for 26 hours, proving clean propulsion at scale. 

Hybrid-electric projects such as the AFRL-funded GHOST integrate battery packs for high-thrust take-off, then cruise with an efficient internal-combustion core, delivering 20% lower fuel burn and reduced acoustic signature. As fuel logistics remain a critical vulnerability, hydrogen and hybrid solutions promise endurance gains without extra tanker sorties, reshaping propulsion choices across defense portfolios.

Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles  Market Share by Propulsion Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Application: Logistics Growth Challenges ISR Dominance

ISR missions accounted for 57.87% revenue in 2024 and will still command the largest slice through 2030. Logistics tasks register the top 14.50% CAGR as militaries accept the inevitability of disrupted rear-area supply lines. 3D-printed airframes manufactured in frontline micro-factories underline the notion that logistics is no longer only about delivery but also about on-site production.

Precision strike, electronic warfare, and decoy applications are converging on multirole payload bays. BriteStorm pods allow a single drone to collect SIGINT on ingress and jam during the attack window, as well as provide post-strike BDA on egress, changing cost calculus in contested skies. These hybridised mission sets incentivize open-systems avionics where software swaps roles faster than hardware refresh cycles, sustaining user flexibility and pushing the military UAV market toward a common bus architecture.

By MTOW: Lightweight Platforms Drive Tactical Innovation

Airframes above 1,200 kg delivered 60.3% of the 2024 turnover because strategic users still invest in high-altitude assets like Global Hawk. However, the less than 150 kg tier records a 12.5% CAGR as loitering munitions, man-portable ISR, and attritable EW craft proliferate. Germany’s 4,000-unit HX-2 order signaled how mid-sized European forces embrace light loiterers for saturation fires. Meanwhile, AeroVironment landed a USD 55.3 million Switchblade call-off that bundles ISR and kinetic strike in a 12 kg tube-launched weapon.

The lightweight wave overlaps with reduced electromagnetic signatures and lower acoustic footprints, critical for near-peer engagements where sensors saturate the spectrum. Collectively, they drive qualitative innovation, forcing suppliers to fit smarter autonomy inside ever-smaller volumes without compromising range, fueling consistent military UAV market growth.

Geography Analysis

North America generated 42.20% of 2024 revenue as Pentagon budgets underwrote programs from long-endurance ISR to manned-unmanned teaming platforms. Given Congressional support for the Replicator initiative and the Air Force’s CCA program, the military UAV market size in the region is forecast to climb steadily. Robust industrial bases in California, Texas, and Virginia supply sensors, data links, and complete airframes, fostering a resilient domestic supply chain.

Europe follows, propelled by defense spending hikes and collaborative frameworks such as the European Defence Fund, which finance offensive UAVs and counter-UAS research. Ongoing security pressures in Eastern Europe fast-track procurement of loitering munitions and ISR drones while also accelerating Indigenous designs. Projects like Airbus Wingman underscore policy moves toward sovereign capabilities with export potential across NATO partners.

The Middle East and Africa posted the strongest 12.65% CAGR outlook as governments diversify suppliers beyond traditional Western vendors. Turkey’s BAYKAR shipped Akıncı systems to the UAE, Pakistan, and Azerbaijan, signalling competitive pricing and rapid delivery cycles. African states collectively procured more than 1,500 drones, with Egypt leading at 267 units, reflecting border-security and counter-insurgency needs. The region’s embrace of unmanned logistics for austere terrain operations keeps demand buoyant despite budget constraints, ensuring continued military UAV market momentum.

Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

Traditional primes such as General Atomics, Northrop Grumman Corporation, and Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. dominate high-altitude endurance designs, yet market fragmentation persists as software-centric entrants contest margins. Anduril Industries and Shield AI deploy rapid DevOps cycles and modular sensor packages, enabling quarterly capability drops versus the multiyear spiral of legacy programs. International challengers, including BAYKAR and Israel Aerospace Industries, capitalise on export flexibility by offering turnkey packages free from ITAR entanglements, expanding their military UAV market footprint in emerging regions.

Strategic moves in 2025 highlight ecosystem consolidation. General Atomics secured a USD 99.2 million contract for the hybrid-electric GHOST, pairing proprietary propulsion with open-mission systems to hedge against future fuel-cell disruption. Leonardo inked an MoU with BAYKAR to co-develop autonomy stacks, aligning European sensor expertise with Turkish cost competitiveness. Textron Systems broadened its scope into maritime by winning a USD 100 million Navy unmanned surface vehicle services deal, signalling cross-domain ambitions.

Competitive positioning increasingly pivots on vertical control of AI algorithms, secure cloud back-ends, and proprietary datasets that train autonomy at scale. As export controls tighten, primes with global manufacturing footprints and diversified compliance capabilities should gain relative strength, whereas smaller hardware-only suppliers risk margin compression. Overall, the top five vendors captured roughly 55% of global revenue in 2024, leaving room for regional specialists and venture-funded disruptors to seize niche opportunities across the military UAV market.

Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Industry Leaders

  1. Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.

  2. General Atomics

  3. AeroVironment, Inc.

  4. Northrop Grumman Corporation

  5. Teledyne Technologies Incorporated

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • June 2025: The Indian Army signed a USD 16.4 million contract with ideaForge to procure hybrid mini-UAVs. This initiative aims to enhance drone capabilities with indigenous technology, address supply chain vulnerabilities, and reduce reliance on foreign systems while reinforcing secure, self-reliant defense strategies amid escalating geopolitical tensions.
  • March 2025: Leonardo recorded EUR 6.9 billion (USD 8.10 billion) in new orders and signed an MoU with BAYKAR for unmanned cooperation.
  • January 2025: AeroVironment announced a USD 55.3 million delivery order for Switchblade loitering munitions under a 5-year IDIQ valued at USD 990 million.

Table of Contents for Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Industry Report

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Expanding multi-domain ISR requirements
    • 4.2.2 DoD shift to manned-unmanned teaming (MUM-T) concepts
    • 4.2.3 Rapid miniaturization of on-board EW and strike payloads
    • 4.2.4 Demand for attritable UAVs for contested logistics
    • 4.2.5 Emergence of AI-enabled swarm autonomy
    • 4.2.6 Spectrum-sharing breakthroughs for BVLOS operations
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Complex, tightening export-control regimes (ITAR, MTCR)
    • 4.3.2 Cyber-attack surface expansion in network-centric ops
    • 4.3.3 Proliferation of low-cost counter-UAS systems
    • 4.3.4 Limited SATCOM bandwidth in peer-peer conflict zones
  • 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 5.1 By Platform Type
    • 5.1.1 Fixed-wing
    • 5.1.2 Rotary-wing
    • 5.1.3 Hybrid
  • 5.2 By Payload Weight Class
    • 5.2.1 Nano/Micro (Less than 2 kg)
    • 5.2.2 Mini (2 to 20 kg)
    • 5.2.3 Small (20 to 150 kg)
    • 5.2.4 Medium (150 to 600 kg)
    • 5.2.5 Large (More than 600 kg)
  • 5.3 By Propulsion Type
    • 5.3.1 Internal Combustion Engine (ICE)
    • 5.3.2 Batteries
    • 5.3.3 Fuel Cells
    • 5.3.4 Hybrid Cells
  • 5.4 By Application
    • 5.4.1 Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR)
    • 5.4.2 Precision Strike and Combat
    • 5.4.3 Electronic Warfare
    • 5.4.4 Logistics and Resupply
    • 5.4.5 Target Acquisition/Decoy
    • 5.4.6 Training and Simulation
  • 5.5 By MTOW
    • 5.5.1 Less than 150 kg
    • 5.5.2 150 to 1,200 kg
    • 5.5.3 Greater than 1,200 kg
  • 5.6 By Geography
    • 5.6.1 North America
    • 5.6.1.1 United States
    • 5.6.1.2 Canada
    • 5.6.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.6.2 Europe
    • 5.6.2.1 United Kingdom
    • 5.6.2.2 France
    • 5.6.2.3 Germany
    • 5.6.2.4 Russia
    • 5.6.2.5 Rest of Europe
    • 5.6.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.3.1 China
    • 5.6.3.2 Japan
    • 5.6.3.3 India
    • 5.6.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.6.3.5 Australia
    • 5.6.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.4 South America
    • 5.6.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.6.4.2 Rest of South America
    • 5.6.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.6.5.1 Middle East
    • 5.6.5.1.1 Israel
    • 5.6.5.1.2 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.6.5.1.3 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.6.5.1.4 Turkey
    • 5.6.5.1.5 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.6.5.2 Africa
    • 5.6.5.2.1 South Africa
    • 5.6.5.2.2 Rest of Africa

6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global-level Overview, Market-level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 General Atomics
    • 6.4.2 Northrop Grumman Corporation
    • 6.4.3 Lockheed Martin Corporation
    • 6.4.4 The Boeing Company
    • 6.4.5 AeroVironment, Inc.
    • 6.4.6 Textron Systems Corporation (Textron Inc.)
    • 6.4.7 Kratos Defense and Security Solutions, Inc.
    • 6.4.8 BAYKAR MAKİNA SANAYİ VE TİCARET A.Ş.
    • 6.4.9 Turkish Aerospace Industries, Inc.
    • 6.4.10 Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd.
    • 6.4.11 Elbit Systems Ltd.
    • 6.4.12 Safran SA
    • 6.4.13 Leonardo S.p.A
    • 6.4.14 Saab AB
    • 6.4.15 Thales Group
    • 6.4.16 Airbus SE
    • 6.4.17 Anduril Industries, Inc.
    • 6.4.18 EDGE Group PJSC
    • 6.4.19 QinetiQ Group
    • 6.4.20 Korea Aerospace Industries, Ltd.
    • 6.4.21 Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
    • 6.4.22 Aviation Industry Corporation of China, Ltd. (AVIC)

7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the military unmanned aerial vehicle market as all new, purpose-built airframes and associated ground systems designed for defense or security missions in which flight is controlled remotely, autonomously, or through manned-unmanned teaming. Included platforms range from nano reconnaissance craft under 2 kg to heavy, jet-powered HALE systems exceeding 1,200 kg; payload revenues (electro-optics, EW pods, weapons) are embedded because they are integral to air vehicle procurement.

Scope exclusions: civil, commercial, and counter-UAS assets are outside the baseline.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Platform Type
    • Fixed-wing
    • Rotary-wing
    • Hybrid
  • By Payload Weight Class
    • Nano/Micro (Less than 2 kg)
    • Mini (2 to 20 kg)
    • Small (20 to 150 kg)
    • Medium (150 to 600 kg)
    • Large (More than 600 kg)
  • By Propulsion Type
    • Internal Combustion Engine (ICE)
    • Batteries
    • Fuel Cells
    • Hybrid Cells
  • By Application
    • Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR)
    • Precision Strike and Combat
    • Electronic Warfare
    • Logistics and Resupply
    • Target Acquisition/Decoy
    • Training and Simulation
  • By MTOW
    • Less than 150 kg
    • 150 to 1,200 kg
    • Greater than 1,200 kg
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Germany
      • Russia
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Rest of South America
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Middle East
        • Israel
        • Saudi Arabia
        • United Arab Emirates
        • Turkey
        • Rest of Middle East
      • Africa
        • South Africa
        • Rest of Africa

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Two modest surveys of procurement officers and program managers across North America, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, followed by deep-dive interviews with retired squadron commanders and propulsion engineers, enabled Mordor researchers to stress test adoption timelines, unit costs, and attrition assumptions uncovered during desk work.

Desk Research

Our analysts began with open data from sources such as the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, NATO defense spending dashboards, and Jane's equipment inventories, which reveal force structures and planned drone inductions. Import-export ledgers from Volza, ITAR licensing releases, and UN Comtrade shipments clarified cross-border flows of airframes and subsystems. Budget documents filed to the U.S. Congress, European defense white papers, and parliamentary transcripts supplied contract values, while peer-reviewed journals in IEEE Xplore described propulsion and sensor cost curves that shape average selling prices. Proprietary pulls from D&B Hoovers and Dow Jones Factiva provided vendor backlogs and program milestones. The list above is illustrative; many additional secondary sources informed data collection and validation.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down demand pool construct starts with each nation's defense budget, then allocates historical UAV outlays, procurement cycles, and typical unit prices to derive baseline volumes, which are then corroborated through selective bottom-up supplier roll-ups and channel checks. Key variables like battlefield loss rates, engine power-to-weight trends, SATCOM bandwidth costs, export-control relaxation indices, and theater-specific sortie hours drive both size and mix forecasts. Multivariate regression modeled against these indicators underpins CAGR estimates; scenario analysis tests shocks such as rapid attrition spikes or embargoes. Data gaps in emerging regions are bridged by triangulating median spend per soldier ratios to peer forces with comparable threat levels.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs pass variance scans versus independent mission-ready fleet statistics and quarterly contract announcements. An analyst advisory circle reviews anomalies before sign-off. Reports refresh yearly, with interim updates when conflicts, sanctions, or major contracts materially shift the outlook.

Why Mordor's Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Baseline Commands Reliability

Published figures often diverge because firms select dissimilar platform mixes, embed payloads differently, or convert currencies at varied cadences.

Key gap drivers include: some studies fold commercial or counter-UAS hardware into totals; others apply aggressive price erosion curves or exclude heavy-lift hybrids still in prototype. Mordor reports the active acquisition base case, refreshes annually, and applies verified ASP progressions, so numbers remain grounded.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 15.63 B Mordor Intelligence -
USD 15.80 B Global Consultancy A counts partial 2024 deliveries twice, limited primary validation
USD 16.07 B (2024) Regional Consultancy B wider scope adds small police drones and C-UAS gear
USD 45.69 B (2025) Trade Journal C aggregates entire drone market, minimal platform filtering

In sum, while other publishers offer useful directional views, Mordor's disciplined scope setting, budget-anchored modeling, and continual update cadence provide decision-makers with the most dependable baseline for planning and benchmarking.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current value of the Military UAV market?

The military UAV market reached USD 15.63 billion in 2025 and is on track for USD 27.42 billion by 2030, advancing at an 11.90% CAGR.

Which platform type leads Military UAV sales today?

Fixed-wing platforms dominated with an 80.5% revenue share in 2024 due to superior range and payload capacity.

Why are logistics UAVs growing faster than ISR drones?

Peer-conflict war-games showed that conventional supply routes are vulnerable, pushing demand for uncrewed resupply aircraft that post a 14.5% CAGR.

Which region is expanding Military UAV procurement most rapidly?

The Middle East and Africa posted the strongest 12.65% CAGR outlook as governments diversify suppliers beyond traditional Western vendors.

Which region has the biggest share in Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Market?

North America generated 42.20% of 2024 revenue as Pentagon budgets underwrote programs from long-endurance ISR to manned-unmanned teaming platforms.

How are export controls affecting the Military UAV industry?

Stricter ITAR and MTCR rules lengthen licensing timelines and raise compliance costs, particularly hampering smaller exporters.

Page last updated on:

Military Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Report Snapshots