Marine Port Services Market Size and Share

Marine Port Services Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Marine Port Services Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Marine Port Services Market size is estimated at USD 94.45 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 118.29 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 4.60% during the forecast period (2025-2030).

The steady trajectory is underpinned by an 8.7% rebound in global container volumes in 2024 following Red Sea rerouting, confirmed by 815 million TEU handled worldwide. Government infrastructure programs inject more than USD 200 billion into port modernization, and the United States alone directs sizable federal funding through comprehensive legislation. Asia-Pacific extends its leadership as both a demand hub and a supply base, while technology adoption improves throughput and creates resilience against geopolitical chokepoints. Environmental regulation accelerates capital spending on shore-power systems, driving new procurement cycles despite near-term cost pressure. Consolidation unfolds by way of alliances rather than outright mergers, enabling operators to scale digital platforms without diluting regional autonomy.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By geography, Asia-Pacific held 41.0% of marine port services market share in 2024 while posting the fastest CAGR at 4.8% through 2030.
  • By service, container handling commanded 69.0% share of the marine port services market size in 2024, whereas supply-chain and logistics solutions are projected to expand at a 4.1% CAGR to 2030.
  • By ownership, state-owned facilities retained 53.0% share of the marine port services market size in 2024, but PPP/concession ports exhibit the highest forecast CAGR at 3.8% to 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Service: Container Handling Dominates Revenue Streams

Container handling accounted for 69.0% of the marine port services market share in 2024, validating the structural shift toward containerized trade. The segment benefits from high switching costs and scale advantages, keeping throughput fees firm even in volatile demand cycles. Supply-chain and logistics solutions represent the fastest-growing opportunity, rising at a 4.1% CAGR as ports transform into integrated distribution hubs. Technology-enabled visibility platforms further monetize cargo data streams, supplementing traditional handling revenues.

Real-time analytics have lowered dwell times and reduced the need for buffer stock, allowing shippers to adopt just-in-time models without sacrificing reliability. Automated cranes and stackers require 40% fewer personnel, boosting margins while creating room for performance-based contracting. As multimodal offerings expand, supply-chain services could narrow the revenue gap with core handling functions, reinforcing diversification across the marine port services market.

Marine Port Services Market: Market Share by Service Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Ownership and Governance: Private Capital Accelerates Efficiency

State-controlled entities still command 53.0% of the marine port services market size, but PPP and concession formats are scaling faster with a 3.8% CAGR. Governments leverage private sector know-how to accelerate automation and unlock efficiencies, illustrated by Brazil’s USD 1.2 billion terminal awards in 2024. Private greenfield ports, though currently the smallest slice, achieve crane moves per hour 20-25% above state averages and roll out new technology several years earlier.

ISO 28000 certification has become table stakes for winning long-term concessions because carriers emphasize secure, traceable supply chains. Private sponsors often embed performance clauses tied to yard throughput, encouraging continuous improvement. This alignment positions concessionaires to outpace legacy facilities, heightening competitive intensity in the marine port services market.

Marine Port Services Market: Market Share by Ownership and  Governance
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific retained 41.0% of overall revenue in 2024 and is forecast to grow at 4.8% CAGR through 2030, bolstered by China’s automation roadmap and India’s Sagarmala corridors. Belt and Road investments totaling USD 62 billion across 34 foreign projects extend Chinese terminal influence, diverting cargo toward preferred routes. Southeast Asian facilities gained 12% volume in 2024, aided by electronics and apparel manufacturing shifts to Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia. Port planners emphasize dual-fuel equipment and renewable energy, keeping environmental compliance on track while optimizing operating expenditure.

Europe focuses on decarbonization and digital twins. Rotterdam’s EUR 850 million (USD 938.09 million) green-bond program targets shore-power across 25 berths, aiming for carbon-neutral operations by 2030. Hamburg reduced equipment downtime by 22% after adopting predictive models, freeing berth capacity for higher-margin services. Integrated rail and river networks extend port hinterlands deep into Central Europe, mitigating congestion risk and stabilizing the marine port services market.

North America leverages near-shoring to Mexico and infrastructure funding to modernize East and Gulf Coast terminals. Federal support complements private investment, raising crane density and on-dock rail capacity at Houston, New Orleans, and Mobile. Canadian Arctic gateways prepare for seasonal cargo via the Northern Sea Route, positioning for niche grains and minerals trades as ice-free periods lengthen. Competition now hinges on reliability and integrated customs processing rather than solely on vessel size accommodation, reshaping regional dynamics of the marine port services market.

Marine Port Services Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

Global operators remain fragmented yet cooperative. DP World, APM Terminals, and PSA build digital corridors that integrate customs, trucking, and warehousing under single platforms. Strategic partnerships allow sharing of predictive analytics without full asset consolidation, preserving regional control while scaling technology. AI-based maintenance cuts troubleshooting hours and reduces spare-parts inventory, trimming operational overhead and widening margins.

Niche entrants capture opportunities in offshore wind logistics and Arctic support, areas overlooked by mainstream players. Specialized fleets and heavy-lift cranes differentiate service capability and attract project cargo. ISO-certified environmental management systems are now prerequisites for long-term carrier contracts, raising the qualification bar for new entrants. The moderate concentration leaves room for further clustering, yet capital barriers deter rapid newcomer entry, maintaining balance within the marine port services market.

Mergers have been limited; instead, operators acquire minority stakes or sign long-term management contracts. Hutchison Ports’ USD 580 million entry into Barcelona enhances Mediterranean reach without full-scale consolidation risk. DP World’s extra capacity at Jebel Ali raises its throughput to secure rerouted Asia-Europe flows, further anchoring its role as a transshipment hub between the two regions. Competitive positioning increasingly revolves around carbon-management credentials and data transparency, not only berth length or draft depth.

Marine Port Services Industry Leaders

  1. APM Terminals

  2. MAN-TESS group

  3. Schulte & Bruns GmbH & Co. KG

  4. American President Lines (APL) (Subsdiary of CMA CGM)

  5. Ports America

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
DP World Limited, AP Moller Maersk,  Hamburger Hafen Und Logistik AG, Shanghai International Port, Shipping Solutions and Services Ltd.
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • January 2025: DP World closed a USD 1.8 billion expansion at Jebel Ali, adding 4.5 million TEU of capacity to capture traffic diverted from the Red Sea.
  • December 2024: COSCO Shipping Ports invested USD 2.1 billion in eight mainland China terminals to deploy autonomous cranes and vehicles, aiming for 30% productivity improvement by 2026.
  • October 2024: APM Terminals signed a USD 650 million concession with Santos Port Authority to automate Terminal 4 and integrate rail links to Sao Paulo.
  • September 2024: Hutchison Ports finalized a USD 580 million purchase of Barcelona Container Terminal, expanding its Mediterranean footprint.

Table of Contents for Marine Port Services Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Surge in global containerized trade volumes
    • 4.2.2 Government-backed port infrastructure investments
    • 4.2.3 Rapid digitalization and automation of port operations
    • 4.2.4 Near-shoring-driven secondary-port demand
    • 4.2.5 Offshore-wind logistics support services
    • 4.2.6 Arctic shipping lane emergence
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 High capital intensity and long payback cycles
    • 4.3.2 Stringent environmental and decarbonization mandates
    • 4.3.3 Geopolitical chokepoint disruptions
    • 4.3.4 Competition from inland dry-ports and land corridors
  • 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter's Five Forces
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitute Products
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
  • 4.8 Impact of COVID-19 and Geo-Political Events

5. Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value)

  • 5.1 By Service
    • 5.1.1 Container Handling Services
    • 5.1.2 Ship Repair and Maintenance Services
    • 5.1.3 Supply-Chain and Logistics Solutions
    • 5.1.4 Other Services
  • 5.2 By Ownership and Governance
    • 5.2.1 State-Owned Ports
    • 5.2.2 PPP / Concession Ports
    • 5.2.3 Private Greenfield Ports
  • 5.3 By Geography (Value, USD billion)
    • 5.3.1 North America
    • 5.3.1.1 United States
    • 5.3.1.2 Canada
    • 5.3.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.3.2 South America
    • 5.3.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.3.2.2 Peru
    • 5.3.2.3 Chile
    • 5.3.2.4 Argentina
    • 5.3.2.5 Rest of South America
    • 5.3.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.3.3.1 India
    • 5.3.3.2 China
    • 5.3.3.3 Japan
    • 5.3.3.4 Australia
    • 5.3.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.3.3.6 South East Asia (Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam, and Philippines)
    • 5.3.3.7 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.3.4 Europe
    • 5.3.4.1 United Kingdom
    • 5.3.4.2 Germany
    • 5.3.4.3 France
    • 5.3.4.4 Spain
    • 5.3.4.5 Italy
    • 5.3.4.6 BENELUX (Belgium, Netherlands, and Luxembourg)
    • 5.3.4.7 NORDICS (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden)
    • 5.3.4.8 Rest of Europe
    • 5.3.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.3.5.1 United Arab of Emirates
    • 5.3.5.2 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.3.5.3 South Africa
    • 5.3.5.4 Nigeria
    • 5.3.5.5 Rest of Middle East And Africa

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles {(includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)}
    • 6.4.1 APM Terminals
    • 6.4.2 Ports America
    • 6.4.3 American President Lines (APL) (Subsdiary of CMA CGM)
    • 6.4.4 MAN-TESS group
    • 6.4.5 Schulte and Bruns GmbH and Co. KG
    • 6.4.6 Irish Continental Group
    • 6.4.7 Velogic
    • 6.4.8 Supermaritime Group
    • 6.4.9 Pacific Cargo Services (Division of NKW Group)
    • 6.4.10 Klaipeda stevedoring company BEGA
    • 6.4.11 Port Stevedoring (PS)
    • 6.4.12 Inchcape Shipping Services
    • 6.4.13 Finnsteve Oy Ab
    • 6.4.14 Buss Port Services
    • 6.4.15 Streamline Shipping Group
    • 6.4.16 Taurus Global Marine
    • 6.4.17 Rogers Shipping Ltd.
    • 6.4.18 Celtic Shipping Agencies LTD
    • 6.4.19 Broekman Logistics
    • 6.4.20 Jenkins Shipping

7. Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment
**Subject to Availability
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Global Marine Port Services Market Report Scope

Global Port Services are ideally placed to provide clients with an unparalleled solution in marine logistics and port agency services, handling in excess of 800 port call movements. In the UK and overseas, global port services means the company that has an infrastructure that supports the main operational ports as well as having a very strong supply chain team that allows pre-planned or short notice calls to be managed efficiently and effectively utilising a skilled, multi-disciplined workforce. The Global Marine port Services Market is segmented By Service Analysis (container handling services, ship repair and maintenance services, supply chain, Mechanical and electrical engineering services, navigation services and Logistics Solutions) and By Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific and Latin America , Middle East and Africa). The report offers market size and forecasts for Global Marine Port Services Market in value ( USD Billion ) for all above segments.

By Service
Container Handling Services
Ship Repair and Maintenance Services
Supply-Chain and Logistics Solutions
Other Services
By Ownership and Governance
State-Owned Ports
PPP / Concession Ports
Private Greenfield Ports
By Geography (Value, USD billion)
North America United States
Canada
Mexico
South America Brazil
Peru
Chile
Argentina
Rest of South America
Asia-Pacific India
China
Japan
Australia
South Korea
South East Asia (Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam, and Philippines)
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Europe United Kingdom
Germany
France
Spain
Italy
BENELUX (Belgium, Netherlands, and Luxembourg)
NORDICS (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden)
Rest of Europe
Middle East and Africa United Arab of Emirates
Saudi Arabia
South Africa
Nigeria
Rest of Middle East And Africa
By Service Container Handling Services
Ship Repair and Maintenance Services
Supply-Chain and Logistics Solutions
Other Services
By Ownership and Governance State-Owned Ports
PPP / Concession Ports
Private Greenfield Ports
By Geography (Value, USD billion) North America United States
Canada
Mexico
South America Brazil
Peru
Chile
Argentina
Rest of South America
Asia-Pacific India
China
Japan
Australia
South Korea
South East Asia (Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam, and Philippines)
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Europe United Kingdom
Germany
France
Spain
Italy
BENELUX (Belgium, Netherlands, and Luxembourg)
NORDICS (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden)
Rest of Europe
Middle East and Africa United Arab of Emirates
Saudi Arabia
South Africa
Nigeria
Rest of Middle East And Africa
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

How fast is container handling revenue expected to grow through 2030?

It is projected to advance at a 4.60% CAGR, keeping pace with overall market expansion documented in this report.

Which region adds the greatest absolute value between 2025 and 2030?

Asia-Pacific contributes the largest incremental revenue due to high trade volumes and sustained 4.8% CAGR, supported by automation and infrastructure funding.

What drives interest in secondary U.S. Gulf Coast ports?

Supply-chain near-shoring from Mexico, combined with federal modernization grants, has lifted Gulf Coast throughput to record levels in 2024.

How do FuelEU Maritime rules influence capital spending?

Each qualifying berth must install shore-power at a cost of USD 15-25 million, prompting ports to raise green-bond financing or seek concessionaire funding.

Why are PPP models gaining momentum in emerging markets?

Private capital accelerates technology deployment and reduces public debt burdens, leading to productivity rates 20-25% above comparable state-owned facilities.

Page last updated on:

Marine Port Services Market Report Snapshots