Flight Simulator Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The flight simulator market size stood at USD 7.22 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 9.31 billion by 2030, advancing at a 5.22% CAGR over the forecast period. Mandatory training regulations, a widening pilot shortage, and the shift toward advanced air-mobility platforms keep demand on a steady, structural growth path even as post-pandemic catch-up spending fades. Airlines and militaries are modernizing curricula around competency-based frameworks, prompting sustained investment in immersive technologies that compress training cycles while protecting safety margins. Service-oriented business models increasingly dominate procurement, insulating operators from upfront capital burdens and allowing suppliers to monetize lifetime support. Regionally, North America maintains scale leadership, yet Asia-Pacific shows the fastest capacity build-out as India and China race to staff their record aircraft backlogs. Consolidation among top vendors is accelerating as companies seek vertical integration that bundles hardware, software, and training analytics into a single outcome-based offering.
Key Report Takeaways
- By simulator type, full flight simulators (FFS) captured 49.29% of the flight simulator market share in 2024, while mixed-/virtual-reality procedural trainers are expanding at a 10.45% CAGR through 2030.
- By aircraft platform, fixed-wing devices held a 60.45% share of the flight simulator market in 2024, yet the advanced air-mobility/eVTOL category is forecasted to rise at a 9.55% CAGR between 2025 and 2030.
- By training method, synthetic environments accounted for a 72.32% share in 2024, and virtual solutions are advancing at a 7.89% CAGR to 2030.
- By solution, hardware represented 56.71% of the 2024 flight simulator market size, whereas services are growing the quickest at 6.54% CAGR through 2030.
- By geography, North America led with 39.92% revenue share in 2024; Asia-Pacific is projected to post the highest regional CAGR at 7.23% over 2025–2030
Global Flight Simulator Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | ( ~ ) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Post-COVID pilot-shortage accelerating simulator demand | +1.20% | North America, Asia-Pacific | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Mandatory upset-recovery and MPL curriculum adoption | +0.80% | Global | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Fleet renewal toward composite and e-propulsion aircraft | +0.60% | North America, EU | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Defense shift to Live-Virtual-Constructive (LVC) training | +0.90% | North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| eVTOL type-rating regulations (Part 419) | +0.40% | North America initially, global later | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| AI-enabled adaptive training analytics | +0.30% | Developed markets worldwide | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Post-COVID Pilot-Shortage Accelerating Simulator Demand
Global pilot pipelines remain stressed even after temporary hiring pauses, keeping full-motion device utilization at record levels. Regional carriers in the United States report fewer resignations, yet cannot meet long-run cockpit staffing needs as fleet growth outpaces training capacity. Australia lost 25,000 aviation workers during the pandemic, forcing Boeing Australia to double technician apprenticeship slots to maintain maintenance schedules. India’s plan for more than 50 new academies underscores how emerging markets institutionalize simulators to close a projected 30,000-pilot gap within 15–20 years. These structural shortages boost recurring demand for both initial and recurrent training devices, anchoring revenue visibility across the flight simulator market.
Mandatory Upset-Recovery and MPL Curriculum Adoption
Regulators have codified upset-prevention and recovery training, transforming what was once best practice into a legal obligation. The International Civil Aviation Organization’s competency-based template now guides FAA and EASA rulemaking, embedding high-fidelity simulation into core syllabi.[1]Airbus, “Is CBTA the Future of Pilot Training?” aircraft.airbus.com Multi-Crew Pilot License (MPL) pathways further compress live-flight hour requirements, redirecting training budgets toward full-motion and mixed-reality devices replicating complex scenarios. Airlines adopting CBTA frameworks report measurable gains in flight-path management and crew resource skills, reinforcing simulator demand across recurrent cycles.
Fleet Renewal Toward Composite and E-Propulsion Aircraft
Operators are phasing in composite and electric-propulsion fleets that behave very differently from legacy metal airframes. Pilots must master new energy-management techniques, automation layers, and envelope protections long before line operations begin, so OEMs now embed high-fidelity simulators in every certification program. The FAA’s powered-lift regulations formalize this need by requiring dedicated type-rating courses for eVTOL crews, locking in a predictable block of simulator hours per pilot. Airlines are therefore accelerating the replacement of devices that cannot replicate glass cockpits, fly-by-wire logics or electric power-loss scenarios. Training centers report that demand for retrofits and new mixed-reality rigs already exceeds pre-pandemic peaks, creating multi-year backlogs for visual and motion subsystems. As composite and e-propulsion programs scale, the flight simulator market gains a durable stream of refresh orders that decouple revenue from the airline traffic cycle.
Defense Shift to Live-Virtual-Constructive Training
Modern threat environments require aircrews to rehearse integrated air, land, sea, space, and cyber missions without the expense of full live-force deployments. The US Navy’s roadmap targets seamless detection and engagement of synthetic adversaries by 2035, effectively mandating networked simulators for every carrier air wing. Boeing, Cubic, and Patria have already demonstrated interoperable LVC suites that link real jets with virtual assets and constructive targets, slashing fuel burn while expanding scenario variety. NATO partners are now writing LVC credit into readiness metrics, which lifts procurement above discretionary status. Secure data links, latency controls, and cyber-hardened gateways become critical differentiators, steering contracts toward suppliers with proven multi-domain architectures. These dynamics embed sustained growth for networked simulators as defense ministries substitute expensive flight hours with agile synthetic sorties.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | ( ~ ) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supply-chain constraints on visual-display collimators | -0.70% | North America, EU | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Rising cyber-hardening certification costs (DO-326A) | -0.50% | Global | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Mid-tier flight schools’ capital-access squeeze | -0.40% | North America, EU | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Increasing availability of low-cost PC-based sims | -0.30% | Global | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Supply-Chain Constraints on Visual-Display Collimators
High-fidelity Level D devices rely on precision optics built by several suppliers. Delivery of collimated display assemblies is slipping as aerospace primes pull critical components into their programs, delaying acceptance tests and inflating backlogs.[2]FlightSafety International, “FlightSafety Simulation,” flightsafety.com An industry survey found 60% of tier-2 avionics vendors citing the B737 MAX production ramp as the single largest bottleneck dragging down deliveries across the training device ecosystem. The shortage inflates unit prices and forces OEMs to prioritize airline contracts over flight-school orders, slowing adoption of mixed-reality trainers that rely on the same projection glass. Some operators resort to interim retrofits that fall short of FAA Level-D fidelity, delaying regulatory approvals and revenue service. Unless new suppliers enter the optics niche, these constraints will cap near-term growth despite strong demand signals.
Rising Cyber-Hardening Certification Costs (DO-326A)
Simulators increasingly connect to cloud analytics, airline IP networks, and defense training ranges, making them subject to aviation-grade cybersecurity rules. The FAA’s proposed Equipment, Systems, and Network Information Security Protection rule, aligned with EASA ED-202A guidance, obliges manufacturers to document threat assessments and life-cycle mitigations for every connected component. Compliance adds specialized engineering, penetration testing, and recurrent audit costs that smaller builders cannot spread across large fleets. Airlines fear downtime from evolving security patches, so they gravitate to providers offering turnkey cyber-maintenance services. These factors accelerate consolidation and favor vertically integrated vendors with in-house security labs. As AI analytics and remote-update functions proliferate, cyber-hardening will remain a rising cost curve that suppliers must either absorb or pass through to customers, constraining margins in price-sensitive segments.
Segment Analysis
By Simulator Type: Mixed Reality Drives Training Evolution
Full-flight simulators (FFS) retained nearly half of 2024 revenue. Yet mixed/virtual-reality procedural trainers are pacing the flight simulator market with a 10.45% CAGR, signaling operator confidence in immersive technologies for non-maneuver tasks.[3]Military + Aerospace Electronics, “CAE Develops AR for Flight Training,” militaryaerospace.com The cost of a compact VR trainer can be a fraction of a full-motion device, enabling airlines to deploy multiple units at crew bases and cut travel overhead. Alaska Airlines’ investment in Loft Dynamics VR B737 platforms exemplifies the shift, with installations planned at several hubs pending FAA sign-off.
Immersive headsets paired with motion-cueing now deliver sufficient fidelity for cockpit familiarization and emergency drills, freeing scarce Level D capacity for final proficiency checks. The FAA’s joint program with Vertex Solutions and Varjo to craft XR standards should speed certification pathways, accelerating adoption across regional carriers and flight schools. As device prices fall and software ecosystems mature, mixed-reality trainers will capture larger slices of the flight simulator market share by the early 2030s.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Aircraft Platform: eVTOL Creates New Training Paradigms
Fixed-wing devices commanded 60.45% of the 2024 flight simulator market size on the back of commercial airline demand, but the eVTOL segment is slated for the fastest expansion at 9.55% CAGR. FAA Part 419 establishes a new type-rating regime for powered-lift, locking in simulator hours as a prerequisite for airline-style urban air-mobility operations.[4]FAA, “Integration of Powered-Lift Pilot Certification,” federalregister.gov CAE’s 700MXR leverages mixed-reality visuals, compact six-axis motion, and AI traffic generators to create urban environment scenarios that legacy helicopter simulators cannot replicate.
Rotary-wing and unmanned platforms continue to see steady replacement demand, particularly in utility missions and offshore support. Militaries also pool fighter and drone simulators into common LVC networks, boosting cross-domain proficiency and squeezing incremental efficiencies from tight defense budgets. Still, eVTOL remains the headline growth story, and suppliers able to validate training devices ahead of Type Certification are positioned to win early adopter contracts.
By Method: Virtual Training Gains Acceptance
Synthetic environments dominated 2024 revenues, accounting for 72.32% of spend, yet pure virtual methods—delivered via distributed PC or cloud—are growing fastest at a 7.89% CAGR. Airlines used pandemic downtime to trial remote recurrent programs and discovered measurable reductions in dead-head travel and roster disruptions. Scientific literature shows strong pilot acceptance of medium-fidelity desktop devices for routine and abnormal procedure rehearsal, particularly when augmented reality overlays are added to reinforce spatial cues.
Regulators remain cautious, limiting credit for purely virtual hours; however, the line between virtual and synthetic is blurring as head-tracking and haptic feedback improve. Airlines now sequence training so that procedural skill-building happens remotely, with Level D sessions focused on maneuver validation and upset-recovery. This model optimizes scarce flight simulator market capacity while trimming total program cost.
By Solution: Services Drive Value Migration
Hardware still generated 56.71% of 2024 revenue, but services—covering instruction, maintenance, and data analytics—are expanding at 6.54% CAGR, reflecting a pivot to performance-based contracts. Airlines increasingly prefer multi-year agreements guaranteeing hours, outcomes, and availability rather than outright equipment purchases. CAE’s Real-time Insights platform mines simulator telemetry to personalize syllabi and documents regulatory compliance automatically, cementing long-term customer ties.
Smaller OEMs lacking global field-service networks find it difficult to compete on uptime guarantees, accelerating consolidation. Software revenues hold the middle ground, underpinning adaptive learning engines and cloud scheduling tools that feed the wider service stack. As more carriers embrace data-driven safety management, demand for continuous analytics subscriptions will keep rising, further shifting revenue mix away from one-off hardware sales within the flight simulator market.
Geography Analysis
North America retained 39.92% of 2024 spending thanks to entrenched airline hubs, military budgets, and FAA regulatory sway. Yet Asia-Pacific is slated to post 7.23% CAGR as Indian and Chinese carriers induct thousands of narrowbodies and retirees drive attrition across regional fleets. Domestic training capacity is racing to catch up, prompting joint ventures with global providers and government incentives for greenfield academies.
Europe remains a steady contributor, propelled by Airbus’s new Toulouse campus, which will train 10,000 personnel annually and house 12 FFS. The Middle East continues to invest in hub-based training centers aligned with its global airline strategy. At the same time, Africa and South America progress more slowly as economic volatility affects capital flows. Nevertheless, local regulators are harmonizing with ICAO standards, opening the door for new training partnerships that will enlarge the addressable flight simulator market over the next decade.
Competitive Landscape
The market shows moderate consolidation as the top five vendors account for an estimated 55–60% of global revenue, leading to an overall concentration score of 6. CAE’s USD 1.05 billion takeover of L3Harris’s Military Training unit broadened its reach across land, sea, space, and cyber domains, adding scale economies that drive price competition.[5]CAE, “CAE to Acquire L3Harris Military Training,” cae.com L3Harris’s divestiture of its Commercial Aviation Solutions arm—now Acron Aviation—introduces a focused mid-cap challenger in avionics and civil simulators.[6]FlightGlobal, “Acron Aviation Emerges,” flightglobal.com
Technology plays are redefining rivalry. Vertex Solutions, Varjo, and Aechelon cooperate with the FAA on XR standards, giving them early access to regulatory insights that can translate into competitive advantage once guidelines are finalized. Loft Dynamics targets narrow niches with compact full-motion VR rigs, securing equity from Alaska Airlines to accelerate B737 productization.
Strategic moves emphasize service synergies. CAE increased its stake in SIMCOM and inked a long-term exclusive training pact with Flexjet, deepening roots in business aviation. HAVELSAN secured repeat orders from Turkish Airlines for 737 MAX devices, signaling growing domestic capability in Türkiye. Collectively, these moves suggest incumbents will keep marrying hardware, content, and analytics to protect margins and deter new entrants.
Flight Simulator Industry Leaders
-
CAE Inc.
-
The Boeing Company
-
FlightSafety International Inc.
-
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
-
Thales Group
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- June 2025: HAVELSAN, a flight simulator manufacturer based in Ankara, Türkiye, received a new order from Turkish Airlines for a B737 MAX full flight simulator, with delivery scheduled for January 2026.
- February 2025: Rheinmetall will supply C-390 flight simulators to the Royal Netherlands Air Force under a contract with Embraer. The contract includes a full flight and mission simulator and a Cargo Handling Station Trainer. The production of these simulators will commence immediately, with delivery expected by the end of 2026. The contract value exceeds EUR 10 million (USD 11.59 million) and was recorded in Q1 2025.
- May 2024: The International Flight Training Center (IFTC) awarded HAVELSAN a contract to deliver an Airbus A320neo/ceo FFS with three engine options.
- March 2024: Exail was awarded a contract by Fosen High School in Norway to deliver a new B737 Flight and Maintenance Training Device to provide a realistic and immersive experience for its students undergoing B737 maintenance and flight training programs.
Global Flight Simulator Market Report Scope
Civil aviation flight training and simulation is designed to train aircraft pilots and crew members by simulating flight conditions. Simulation-based training encompasses using essential equipment or computers to model a real-world scenario. During training, the pilot understands and learns how to perform specific tasks or activities in various circumstances. Simulation is also helpful for reviewing and training pilots with new modifications to existing craft. Simulation software in the market delivers a robust virtual environment for analyzing, testing, and optimizing processes, systems, and operations.
The flight simulator market is segmented by simulator type, aircraft type, and geography. By simulator type, the market is segmented into full flight simulators (FFS), flight training devices (FTDs), and other training types. By aircraft type, the market is segmented into fixed-wing and rotary-wing. The report also covers the market sizes and forecasts for the aircraft flight recorder market in major countries across different regions. For each segment, the market size is provided in terms of value (USD).
| Full Flight Simulator (FFS) |
| Flight Training Device (FTD) |
| Fixed-Base and Desktop Trainer |
| Mixed-/Virtual-Reality Procedural Trainer |
| Fixed-Wing |
| Rotary-Wing |
| Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) |
| Advanced Air Mobility/eVTOL |
| Synthetic |
| Virtual |
| Hardware |
| Software |
| Services |
| North America | United States | |
| Canada | ||
| Mexico | ||
| Europe | United Kingdom | |
| France | ||
| Germany | ||
| Italy | ||
| Russia | ||
| Rest of Europe | ||
| Asia-Pacific | China | |
| India | ||
| Japan | ||
| South Korea | ||
| Australia | ||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | ||
| South America | Brazil | |
| Rest of South America | ||
| Middle East and Africa | Middle East | United Arab Emirates |
| Saudi Arabia | ||
| Rest of Middle East | ||
| Africa | South Africa | |
| Rest of Africa | ||
| By Simulator Type | Full Flight Simulator (FFS) | ||
| Flight Training Device (FTD) | |||
| Fixed-Base and Desktop Trainer | |||
| Mixed-/Virtual-Reality Procedural Trainer | |||
| By Aircraft Platform | Fixed-Wing | ||
| Rotary-Wing | |||
| Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) | |||
| Advanced Air Mobility/eVTOL | |||
| By Method | Synthetic | ||
| Virtual | |||
| By Solution | Hardware | ||
| Software | |||
| Services | |||
| By Geography | North America | United States | |
| Canada | |||
| Mexico | |||
| Europe | United Kingdom | ||
| France | |||
| Germany | |||
| Italy | |||
| Russia | |||
| Rest of Europe | |||
| Asia-Pacific | China | ||
| India | |||
| Japan | |||
| South Korea | |||
| Australia | |||
| Rest of Asia-Pacific | |||
| South America | Brazil | ||
| Rest of South America | |||
| Middle East and Africa | Middle East | United Arab Emirates | |
| Saudi Arabia | |||
| Rest of Middle East | |||
| Africa | South Africa | ||
| Rest of Africa | |||
Key Questions Answered in the Report
How large is the flight simulator market in 2025?
The flight simulator market size reached USD 7.22 billion in 2025 and is projected to grow steadily through 2030.
Which simulator segment is expanding the fastest?
Mixed-/Virtual-Reality Procedural Trainers lead growth at a 10.45% CAGR as operators adopt immersive technologies for procedural training.
Why is Asia-Pacific a priority region for vendors?
Rapid fleet expansion and a forecasted need for 30,000 new pilots over the next 15 years are driving 7.23% CAGR growth in Asia-Pacific demand.
What is the main restraint facing manufacturers?
Supply-chain delays for high-fidelity visual collimators are extending delivery schedules and elevating costs for Level D devices.
How are service models changing procurement?
Airlines prefer long-term, outcome-based contracts that bundle equipment, maintenance and analytics, shifting revenue from hardware to services.
Will eVTOL operations boost simulator demand?
Yes; FAA type-rating rules for powered-lift aircraft lock in simulator hours and fuel a 9.55% CAGR for eVTOL training devices.
Page last updated on: