Chemical Logistics Market Size and Share

Chemical Logistics Market Summary
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Chemical Logistics Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Global Chemical Logistics Market size is estimated at USD 509.80 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 649.60 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 4.97% during the forecast period (2025-2030). Persistent demand for bulk and specialty chemicals, tougher global safety rules, and investment in temperature-controlled assets keep the chemical logistics market on a solid growth path. Petrochemical expansion in Asia-Pacific, rapid adoption of cold-chain solutions for battery electrolytes, and tighter EU rules on classification, labeling, and packaging are shaping capital allocation decisions throughout the sector. Digital tools that track tank-container conditions in real time, together with sustainability programs tied to Scope 3 goals, enable providers to win premium contracts even when freight capacity stays under tension. Service providers that combine multimodal options with advanced compliance know-how are steadily widening their margins while raising switching costs for shippers.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By service, transportation captured 67% revenue share of the chemical logistics market in 2024, whereas Other Services are projected to post the fastest 6.4% CAGR through 2030.
  • By end-user industry, Oil & Gas held 31% of the chemical logistics market share in 2024; Specialty Chemicals are set to expand at a leading 6.7% CAGR during the same horizon.
  • By hazard class, hazardous cargo retained 73% share of the chemical logistics market size in 2024, yet non-hazardous volumes are advancing at a quicker 5.5% CAGR.
  • By temperature control, non-temperature-controlled cargo commanded 61% of the chemical logistics market size in 2024, while temperature-controlled shipments are growing at a brisk 7.2% CAGR.
  • By region, Asia-Pacific accounted for 38% of 2024 revenue and is projected to log the fastest 6.2% CAGR to 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Service: Transportation Dominance Amid Service Diversification

Transportation retained 67% of 2024 revenue, confirming its status as the backbone of the chemical logistics market. The segment benefits from rising inter-regional chemical trade and continues to scale fleets of ISO tanks, flexi-bags, and dedicated chemical trailers. Other Services—covering blending, repackaging, and regulatory support—are on track for a 6.4% CAGR, reflecting a pivot toward margin-rich value-adds.

Digital control towers allow providers to overlay visibility and compliance modules on top of core freight, producing sticky recurring income. Warehousing and inventory management grow steadily as manufacturers relocate buffers close to end markets to curb stock-outs. Integrated offerings that bundle GDP-certified storage with temperature-controlled transport appeal to pharmaceutical and specialty chemical firms looking to simplify vendor lists. Adoption of such bundles strengthens cross-sell potential and underpins wider acceptance of premium rates, reinforcing top-line momentum across the chemical logistics market.

Chemical Logistics
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By End-user Industry: Oil & Gas Leadership Challenged by Specialty Growth

Oil & Gas generated 31% of 2024 revenue, upheld by high-volume shipments of solvents, drilling fluids, and process chemicals that benefit from scale efficiencies. Nevertheless, the specialty segment is set for a 6.7% CAGR, driven by electronic materials, pharmaceutical intermediates, and battery electrolytes that carry higher service complexity and price points.

The switch to electric mobility accelerates demand for electrolyte salts and additives, prompting logistics providers to install temperature-stable tank farms near gigafactory clusters. Pharmaceutical ingredients maintain steady volume with strict GDP rules that reduce commoditization risk. Cosmetics shippers demand eco-certified handling of botanical extracts, favoring operators with green fleets. This changing mix keeps the chemical logistics market agile, encouraging diversification beyond legacy petrochemical volumes.

By Hazard Class: Safety Regulations Drive Service Premiums

Hazardous cargo took 73% of 2024 revenue, underscoring the importance of certified assets, specialist training, and robust insurance. Civil penalties above USD 100,000 per day for serious hazmat violations keep risk high and justify service premiums. Non-hazardous chemicals, while commanding lower freight rates, are advancing at 5.5% CAGR as green chemistry gains traction.

Rising registration fees and stiffer packaging rules make compliance expertise a source of competitive edge. Operators with modern stainless-steel tanks and in-house safety trainers lift fleet utilization while minimizing incident downtime. As more formulations shift toward safer classes, providers diversify their portfolio, lowering overall risk exposure yet enlarging the addressable base of the chemical logistics market.

Chemical Logistics
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Temperature Control: Cold Chain Expansion Drives Premium Growth

Non-temperature-controlled cargo still covers 61% of revenue, largely anchored in commodity streams stable at ambient conditions. Temperature-controlled shipments, however, are predicted to grow 7.2% per year to 2030 on the back of pharmaceutical chemicals and battery components.

Cold chain infrastructure such as dual-compartment ISO tanks and reefers fitted with IoT sensors draws capital investment, but payback remains swift thanks to premium tariffs and reduced spoilage. Providers able to guarantee continuous monitoring win long-term contracts with biopharma innovators, strengthening their position in the chemical logistics market.

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific commands 38% of revenue and is on course for a 6.2% CAGR, helped by fresh petrochemical capacity, robust domestic consumption, and policy support that clusters production near efficient ports. China’s surplus output shifts cargo flows toward India and Southeast Asia, encouraging providers to create new corridor offerings that reroute volumes away from congested gateways. India’s government-backed PCPIR zones concentrate plants and trim drayage time, lifting intra-regional tonnage and reinforcing the chemical logistics market in Asia-Pacific.

North America and Europe remain mature but lucrative thanks to stringent regulations that favor expertise and integrated digital systems. EU CLP and ADR amendments push shippers to partners that can deliver compliant documentation on demand. North America benefits from a dense rail network that handles bulk acids and polymers under established standards. Sustainability pledges drive uptake of intermodal solutions that reduce emissions without sacrificing lead times.

South America and Africa trail on infrastructure yet present upside to operators willing to invest. Chronic port congestion in Lagos, Durban, and Mombasa prompts carriers to deploy feeder loops and inland depots that bypass bottlenecks. The African Continental Free Trade Area promises broader intra-African trade in chemicals, provided customs harmonization and corridor upgrades continue. Investment in rail revamps and inland dry ports could unlock latent demand, enlarging the future chemical logistics market footprint across these regions.

Chemical Logistics Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segments share of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The chemical logistics market shows moderate fragmentation. The top-tier DHL, Kuehne + Nagel, Maersk, and the enlarged DSV post-DB Schenker deal use global reach, dangerous-goods expertise, and digital visibility to shield margins. Mid-tier specialists such as Bertschi, Den Hartogh, and HOYER leverage deep tank-container fleets and multimodal hubs to offer bespoke flows that larger integrators sometimes overlook.

The 2025 DSV-DB Schenker combination creates a provider with nearly 160,000 staff in over 90 nations, expected to realize DKK 9 billion (USD 1.2 billion) annual synergies by 2028. DHL’s EUR 2 billion (USD 2.2 billion) allocation for life-science logistics through 2030 funds GDP-certified hubs across the Americas and Asia-Pacific, anchoring its position in temperature-controlled chemicals. Maersk integrates ocean, rail, and road with IoT-equipped flexi-bags and has announced extra green-fuel vessels to capture customers under Scope 3 mandates.

Digital tools move from optional extras to core differentiators. Real-time CO₂ dashboards, blockchain chain-of-custody, and predictive ETA engines boost retention by lowering audit time for shippers. Scale players pursue selective M&A to access regional tank farms or last-mile ADR fleets, while regional operators form alliances to secure reciprocal capacity. The competitive stakes rise further as customers tighten sustainability scorecards, making transparent emission data and certified equipment prerequisites for bid lists in the chemical logistics market.

Chemical Logistics Industry Leaders

  1. DHL Supply Chain

  2. Kuehne + Nagel International AG

  3. Maersk Logistics & Services

  4. HOYER Group

  5. C.H. Robinson Worldwide

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Chemical Logistics Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • April 2025: DSV completed the EUR 14.3 billion (USD 16.28 billion) acquisition of DB Schenker, forming one of the world’s largest integrated logistics groups with combined revenue of EUR 41.6 billion (USD 47.38 billion).
  • March 2025: Mitsui O.S.K. Lines acquired LBC Tank Terminals for USD 1.71 billion, adding 3 million m³ of chemical storage in Europe and the United States.
  • March 2025: DHL bought CRYOPDP, adding 600,000 annual temperature-controlled shipments and strengthening its clinical-trial logistics network.
  • February 2025: NYK Stolt Tankers ordered six battery- and methanol-ready chemical tankers at a Chinese yard, reflecting a push for lower-emission fleets.

Table of Contents for Chemical Logistics Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Accelerated Asian Petrochemical Output Boosting Intra-regional Volumes
    • 4.2.2 EU CLP & ADR 2024 Revisions Raising Demand for Compliance-Centric 3PLs
    • 4.2.3 Modal Shift to Rail-Road & Multimodal for Decarbonisation
    • 4.2.4 Rising Specialty Chemicals (e.g., Battery Electrolytes, Biopharma Solvents) Require Temperature-Controlled Logistics
    • 4.2.5 IoT-enabled Tank Containers Delivering Real-time Visibility & Chain-of-Custody
    • 4.2.6 Green-Fleet & Scope-3 Emission Targets Creating Premium Service Niches
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Global Shortage of DG-Certified Drivers & Tank Assets
    • 4.3.2 Volatile Bunker/Freight Rates Compressing 3PL Margins
    • 4.3.3 Port Congestion & Infrastructure Gaps in South America & Africa
    • 4.3.4 Escalating Hazardous-Cargo Liability Insurance Premiums
  • 4.4 Value / Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Technological Innovations in the Industry
  • 4.6 Government Regulations and Policies
  • 4.7 Porter's Five Forces
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitute Services (In-house Logistics)
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
  • 4.8 Impact of Geopolitical Events on the Market

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value)

  • 5.1 By Service
    • 5.1.1 Transportation
    • 5.1.1.1 Road
    • 5.1.1.2 Rail
    • 5.1.1.3 Sea/Ocean
    • 5.1.1.4 Air
    • 5.1.2 Warehousing, Distribution & Inventory Management
    • 5.1.3 Other Services
  • 5.2 By End-user Industry
    • 5.2.1 Pharmaceutical
    • 5.2.2 Cosmetics & Personal Care
    • 5.2.3 Oil & Gas
    • 5.2.4 Specialty Chemicals
    • 5.2.5 Other End-users
  • 5.3 By Hazard Class
    • 5.3.1 Hazardous Chemicals
    • 5.3.2 Non-hazardous Chemicals
  • 5.4 By Temperature Control
    • 5.4.1 Temperature-Controlled (Refrigerated/Heated)
    • 5.4.2 Non-Temperature-Controlled
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Peru
    • 5.5.2.3 Chile
    • 5.5.2.4 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.5 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 India
    • 5.5.3.2 China
    • 5.5.3.3 Japan
    • 5.5.3.4 Australia
    • 5.5.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.6 South East Asia (Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam, Philippines)
    • 5.5.3.7 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 Europe
    • 5.5.4.1 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.4.2 Germany
    • 5.5.4.3 France
    • 5.5.4.4 Spain
    • 5.5.4.5 Italy
    • 5.5.4.6 BENELUX (Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg)
    • 5.5.4.7 NORDICS (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden)
    • 5.5.4.8 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.5.5.2 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.3 South Africa
    • 5.5.5.4 Nigeria
    • 5.5.5.5 Rest of Middle East and Africa

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 DHL Supply Chain
    • 6.4.2 Kuehne + Nagel International AG
    • 6.4.3 Maersk Logistics & Services
    • 6.4.4 HOYER Group
    • 6.4.5 C.H. Robinson Worldwide
    • 6.4.6 BDP International
    • 6.4.7 Rhenus SE & Co. KG
    • 6.4.8 A&R Logistics
    • 6.4.9 CEVA Logistics
    • 6.4.10 Al-Futtaim Logistics
    • 6.4.11 Petochem Middle East
    • 6.4.12 Sinotrans Chemical Logistics
    • 6.4.13 Bertschi AG
    • 6.4.14 Suttons Group
    • 6.4.15 Montreal Chemical Logistics
    • 6.4.16 Den Hartogh Logistics
    • 6.4.17 Brenntag Logistics Services
    • 6.4.18 MOL Chemical Tankers
    • 6.4.19 Stolt-Nielsen Ltd.
    • 6.4.20 Katoen Natie N.V.
    • 6.4.21 Toll Group
    • 6.4.22 Yusen Logistics Co., Ltd. (Nippon Yusen Group)
    • 6.4.23 Hellmann Worldwide Logistics SE & Co. KG*

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the chemical logistics market as the aggregate revenue earned from transportation, warehousing, distribution, inventory management, and other value-added services that handle bulk and packaged chemicals across all hazard classes by road, rail, sea, air, and pipelines.

Scope exclusion: Direct-to-consumer parcel delivery of household chemical products is outside this assessment.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Service
    • Transportation
      • Road
      • Rail
      • Sea/Ocean
      • Air
    • Warehousing, Distribution & Inventory Management
    • Other Services
  • By End-user Industry
    • Pharmaceutical
    • Cosmetics & Personal Care
    • Oil & Gas
    • Specialty Chemicals
    • Other End-users
  • By Hazard Class
    • Hazardous Chemicals
    • Non-hazardous Chemicals
  • By Temperature Control
    • Temperature-Controlled (Refrigerated/Heated)
    • Non-Temperature-Controlled
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Peru
      • Chile
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Asia-Pacific
      • India
      • China
      • Japan
      • Australia
      • South Korea
      • South East Asia (Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam, Philippines)
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
      • United Kingdom
      • Germany
      • France
      • Spain
      • Italy
      • BENELUX (Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg)
      • NORDICS (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden)
      • Rest of Europe
    • Middle East and Africa
      • United Arab Emirates
      • Saudi Arabia
      • South Africa
      • Nigeria
      • Rest of Middle East and Africa

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Mordor analysts interviewed global 3PL managers, tanker-operator planners, chemical-plant logistics heads in Asia, Europe, and North America, and regional regulators overseeing dangerous-goods transit. Their insights clarified real-world cost ratios, capacity utilization swings, and emerging safety practices that secondary material alone could not quantify.

Desk Research

We began with public datasets such as UN Comtrade trade codes, OECD-ITF freight performance panels, the International Council of Chemical Associations' production indices, and national hazmat flow statistics from agencies like the US Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Company filings, investor presentations, and reputable trade journals added service mix and pricing context. Subscription tools including D&B Hoovers for 3PL financials and Dow Jones Factiva for deal tracking rounded out the desk review. These sources illustrate, rather than exhaust, the reference pool our analysts consulted.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down build starts with global chemical output (tons and value) and applies mode-wise logistics spend shares that are narrowed by hazard class and temperature control. This is followed by regional trade reconstructions. Select bottom-up checks, sampled carrier revenues, port throughput, and average selling price × volume calculations validate and fine-tune totals. Key model drivers include chemical production tonnage, Freightos Baltic rate indices, new tank-container fleet additions, industrial GDP shifts, and announced chemical CAPEX pipelines. Multivariate regression, supplemented by scenario analysis for regulation or fuel-price shocks, projects the 2025-2030 trajectory.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs pass variance screens against independent freight metrics before two-level analyst reviews. Reports refresh every twelve months, with interim revisions when material events, such as regulation, strike, or supply shock, trigger re-contact of core respondents. A final sense-check is completed immediately before client release.

Why Our Chemical Logistics Baseline Earns Boardroom Trust

Published figures often differ because each firm chooses unique service baskets, pricing assumptions, and refresh rhythms. When we select inputs, we align them with observable trade flows and verified carrier billings, so decision-makers know exactly what the number embodies.

Key gap drivers include varying treatment of warehousing, exclusion of non-hazardous cargo by some publishers, divergent exchange-rate bases, and inconsistent uplift factors for fuel surcharges, which together widen estimate spreads.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 509.8 B Mordor Intelligence
USD 303.1 B Global Consultancy A Covers transportation only; pipelines reported separately
USD 291.9 B Research Publisher B Uses fixed 2021 currency rates; omits non-hazardous flows
USD 275.1 B Industry Journal C Relies on averaged carrier revenues; overlooks recent freight-rate surge

The comparison shows that when scope breadth, current pricing, and multi-source validation come together, Mordor delivers a balanced, transparent baseline that practitioners can retrace and replicate with confidence.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the chemical logistics market?

The chemical logistics market is valued at USD 509.8 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 649.6 billion by 2030 at a 4.97% CAGR.

Why are temperature-controlled services growing so quickly?

Rising shipments of battery electrolytes and biopharma solvents require strict temperature management, pushing temperature-controlled logistics to a 7.2% CAGR through 2030.

How is regulation affecting chemical logistics in Europe?

The revised EU CLP Regulation and upcoming ADR 2025 rules tighten labeling and dangerous-goods transport standards, increasing demand for compliance-focused 3PL services.

What is the biggest operational challenge facing providers?

A global shortage of DG-certified drivers and tank-container assets is constraining capacity, potentially shaving 1.1 percentage points off the market’s forecast CAGR.

How are sustainability goals influencing service offerings?

Shippers seek multimodal and low-carbon options that cut CO₂ emissions, enabling providers with green fleets and real-time carbon tracking to secure premium contracts.

Which region leads the chemical logistics market?

Asia Pacific holds the largest 38% revenue share in 2024 and is also the fastest-growing region with a 6.2% CAGR through 2030.

Page last updated on:

Chemical Logistics Report Snapshots