Market Overview
| Study Period | 2017 - 2030 |
|---|---|
| Base Year For Estimation | 2024 |
| Forecast Data Period | 2025 - 2030 |
| Market Size (2025) | USD 55.30 Billion |
| Market Size (2030) | USD 72.30 Billion |
| Growth Rate (2025 - 2030) | 5.51% CAGR |
| Market Concentration | Low |
Major Players
*Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0. |
|
Europe Fertilizers Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Europe fertilizers market size is valued at USD 55.3 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 72.3 billion by 2030, expanding at a 5.51% CAGR. Robust demand stems from the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy eco-schemes, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, and investments in announced green-ammonia projects that will reconfigure nitrogen supply. Accelerated adoption of controlled-release and water-soluble products, growing investments in renewable energy–powered production, and the rebound in cereal acreage after the 2024 price rally further support growth. Producers face cost-side headwinds from natural-gas price volatility but are responding through vertical integration and renewable feedstock strategies. The Europe fertilizers market displays a fragmented concentration, with the top five firms controlling a minor share of the market size.
Key Report Takeaways
- Straight fertilizers held 77.6% of the Europe fertilizers market share in 2024, and are on track to expand at a 5.63% CAGR to 2030.
- Conventional formulations accounted for 86.9% of the Europe fertilizers market size in 2024 and specialty formulations are forecast to grow at the fastest 5.89% CAGR through 2030.
- Soil application represented 87.9% of the Europe fertilizers market size in 2024, whereas fertigation is projected to advance at a 5.72% CAGR between 2025 and 2030.
- Field crops commanded 84.1% of the Europe fertilizers market share in 2024, but horticultural crops are positioned for a 5.59% CAGR to 2030.
- By geography, Russia led with 21.2% of the Europe fertilizers market share in 2024 and it is forecast to post the highest 6.74% CAGR through 2030.
Europe Fertilizers Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| EU (European Union) CAP (Common Agricultural Policy) eco-schemes boosting balanced fertilization | +0.8% | EU-27, strongest in France, Germany, Netherlands | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Surge in specialty fertilizer adoption for precision farming | +0.9% | Western Europe, Nordic countries | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Rebound in cereal acreage after 2024 price rally | +0.7% | Eastern Europe, France, Germany | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Green-ammonia investments cutting supply-chain emissions | +0.6% | Netherlands, Germany, Norway | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| (Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism) CBAM-driven reshoring of nutrient production | +0.5% | EU-27; particularly Germany, Netherlands | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Rise of controlled-environment farms in Northern Europe | +0.4% | Nordic countries, Netherlands | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Understand The Key Trends Shaping This Market
Download PDF
EU CAP eco-schemes boosting balanced fertilization
The European Union allocates EUR 31 billion (USD 33.5 billion) each year through Common Agricultural Policy eco-schemes that reward nutrient plans minimizing nitrogen and phosphorus losses [1]European Commission, “CAP Funds,” agriculture.ec.europa.eu. These incentives encourage stabilized nitrogen, controlled-release coatings, and precision-application tools that align with environmental objectives. Large cereal growers in France and Germany are modernizing equipment to meet scheme criteria, driving sales of nitrification and urease inhibitors. Fertilizer firms bundle agronomy services with their products to capture value from compliance support. The program’s performance-based payments reduce payback time on precision machinery, accelerating upgrades. Data-driven application planning also enhances yield consistency, reinforcing adoption momentum.
Surge in specialty fertilizer adoption for precision farming
High-resolution imagery from the Copernicus satellite program and on-farm sensors enable variable-rate applications that maximize nutrient efficiency [2]European Space Agency, “Copernicus Services – Land,” copernicus.eu. Controlled-release, liquid, and water-soluble formulations outperform conventional products under these data-driven regimes. Dutch greenhouse operators use fertigation dashboards that adjust nutrient mixes hourly, while Nordic cereal growers deploy coated urea to synchronize nitrogen release with crop uptake. Regional blending facilities tailor micronutrient profiles to local deficiencies, boosting efficacy. Producers offer subscription-based decision-support platforms, turning fertilizers into bundled agronomic solutions. Premium pricing is accepted because reduced losses offset higher product costs, creating a virtuous cycle for specialty growth.
Rebound in cereal acreage after 2024 price rally
Global supply disruptions lifted wheat to USD 302 per metric ton in late 2024, reversing acreage decline across Eastern and Western Europe. Farmers increased winter wheat and corn plantings by 3.2% in France and 2.8% in Germany, immediately lifting nutrient demand. Eastern European growers reopened marginal land, spurring nitrogen and phosphorus sales. Higher profit margins support greater application intensity and upgrades to precision spreaders. Fertilizer distributors report double-digit volume gains during spring 2025 pre-buy campaigns. Elevated cereal prices are anticipated to sustain planting expansion through 2026, underpinning near-term market growth.
CBAM-driven reshoring of nutrient production
The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism phases in levy payments on carbon-intensive fertilizer imports, narrowing delivered-cost differentials and incentivizing regional production. German and Dutch producers are evaluating brownfield retrofits with electrolytic hydrogen to qualify for lower levy rates. Imported urea from North Africa faces cost escalations, prompting buyers to secure European supply. Governments offer tax credits for low-carbon capital expenditures, lowering hurdle rates and accelerating project sanctioning. Rising domestic capacity mitigates supply-chain risk exposed during 2022 geopolitical disruptions, enhancing market resilience. Producers anticipate export opportunities to non-EU neighbors once scale lowers green-premium levels.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tightened nitrate and ammonia emission caps | -0.6% | EU-27; particularly Netherlands, Denmark | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Natural-gas price volatility inflating production costs | -0.8% | Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Rapid uptake of biostimulant substitutes | -0.4% | Western Europe, Mediterranean region | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| East-Europe logistics and sanction disruptions | -0.5% | Eastern Europe, Baltic states | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Tightened nitrate and ammonia emission caps
The Netherlands caps nitrogen applications at 140 kg per hectare for grassland and 170 kg per hectare for arable crops, a cut of nearly 30% from historical norms. Denmark imposes soil-type quotas with stiff fines reaching USD 10,800 per hectare for exceedance. Farmers respond by reducing bulk urea purchases and increasing stabilized granular blends. The transition period dampens near-term demand because growers delay buying while recalibrating nutrient plans. Conventional broadcast practices face replacement by banded placement, lowering total volumes. Fertilizer companies must pivot to enhanced-efficiency lines and provide compliance advisory services, incurring additional costs yet opening premium sales.
Natural-gas price volatility inflating production costs
European natural-gas prices averaged USD 37.8 per MWh in 2024, more than double 2019 levels [3]International Energy Agency, “Gas Market Report Q4 2024,” iea.org. Spot spikes forced CF Industries to idle the Billingham plant and triggered production throttling at several German ammonia units. High and unpredictable feedstock prices erode margins and impair long-term contract negotiations. Producers counter by importing ammonia from regions with cheaper gas, but freight expenses and CBAM levies erode arbitrage gains. Investment in renewable hydrogen offers a hedge yet requires substantial capital and ramp-up time. Persistent volatility deters capacity expansion based on fossil gas, constraining overall supply growth.
Segment Analysis
By Type: Straight Fertilizers Dominate Despite Specialty Growth
Straight fertilizers captured 77.6% of the Europe fertilizers market share in 2024, which is also the fastest-growing segment with a CAGR of 5.63% during the forecast period. Within this category, nitrogenous products are the primary nutrient input for wheat, corn, and rapeseed. The Europe fertilizers market size for complex fertilizers is growing because labor savings and single-pass convenience resonate with large German and French farms. Specialty micronutrient blends command premiums as soil tests reveal widespread zinc and boron deficiencies. Market participants invest in regional blending hubs to tailor nutrient ratios and improve delivery speed, supporting a modest but steady expansion of complex formulations.
With enhanced emission rules pushing for nutrient-use efficiency, ammonium nitrate is gaining share in emission-sensitive zones due to its lower volatilization potential. Urea remains dominant in Eastern Europe, where price sensitivity prevails. Secondary macronutrients such as sulfur experience heightened interest because sulfur deficits limit nitrogen uptake. Suppliers bundle secondary nutrients into NPK compounds to protect their share against specialty entrants. Overall, the segment’s growth trajectory aligns with the broader adoption of balanced nutrition strategies and precision application technologies.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF
By Form: Specialty Formulations Lead Innovation
Conventional formulations accounted for 86.9% of the Europe fertilizers market size in 2024, and specialty formulations are forecast to grow at the fastest 5.89% CAGR through 2030. The Europe fertilizers market size for controlled-release coatings is expanding as polymer-coated urea demonstrates 10% yield gains in greenhouse tomatoes across Spain. Water-soluble grades serve high-density Dutch greenhouses that feed nutrients via drip systems. Liquid formulations support variable-rate aerial and tractor applications, allowing on-the-go adjustments based on sensor data. Slow-release products thrive in turf management where public green standards favor fewer applications.
Conventional granules still dominate bulk field crops because of price advantage and embedded equipment fleets. Tightening nutrient thresholds pushes growers toward specialty formulations that reduce losses and meet compliance targets. Innovators focus on biodegradable coatings and dual-nutrient release mechanisms to broaden appeal. ESG-conscious food brands prefer produce cultivated with enhanced-efficiency nutrients, influencing input choices across supply chains. Sustained R&D investment underlines the segment’s role as the innovation engine of the Europe fertilizers market.
By Application Mode: Soil Applications Remain Dominant
Soil broadcasting and banding retained a 87.9% share in 2024 because mechanized equipment covers large acreages efficiently. Banded placement rises where phosphorus efficiency matters, particularly in precision-tilled German cornfields. The Europe fertilizers market size for fertigation is accelerating with a CAGR of 5.72% as greenhouse acreage grows across the Netherlands and Nordic countries. Integrated systems combine water and nutrients at root-zone intervals, enhancing uptake and reducing leaching. Foliar sprays, while niche, gain traction in stress mitigation during heat waves and drought episodes common in Mediterranean orchards.
Advancements in spreader telemetry enable real-time rate adjustments during soil applications, narrowing performance gaps with fertigation. Nonetheless, water-scarce regions favor fertigation because it pairs irrigation conservation with precise nutrient delivery. Suppliers develop formulations compatible with micro-irrigation hardware, including low-clogging liquid products. The rise of drone-based foliar nutrition offers new delivery avenues, although regulatory frameworks remain under development.
Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF
By Crop Type: Field Crops Drive Volume Demand
Field crops absorbed 84.1% of Europe fertilizers market volume in 2024, with wheat alone using around 35% of total nutrients. Intensifying corn production in Poland and Hungary boosts phosphorus and potassium consumption. The Europe fertilizers market size for horticultural crops is smaller but expanding at a 5.59% CAGR, owing to high-value returns that justify premium specialty inputs. Protected cultivation systems in Spain and the Netherlands demonstrate nutrient application rates triple those of field crops, supporting water-soluble and liquid fertilizer uptake.
Urbanization drives turf and ornamental demand for slow-release products that minimize maintenance. Berry and orchard growers invest in micronutrient and biostimulant packages to enhance fruit quality, aligning with supermarket specifications. As consumer preferences shift toward fresh produce, horticultural expansion will gradually lift specialty fertilizer penetration and diversify product mixes.
Geography Analysis
Europe Fertilizers Market in Russia
Russia led the Europe fertilizers market with a 21.2% share in 2024, despite sanctions that redirected trade flows, and is on a 6.74% CAGR path as government programs subsidize fertilizer use to maintain the export competitiveness of grain. Germany and France jointly account for impressive percentage of regional revenue, driven by intensive production systems that value precision inputs and environmental compliance. German growers accelerate the adoption of stabilized nitrogen, while French farmers expand complex NPK usage across diversified crop portfolios.
The Netherlands, despite its relatively small agricultural area, represents a disproportionately large fertilizer market due to its intensive greenhouse industry and high-value crop production systems. Dutch greenhouse operations consume an average of 400 kg of nutrients per hectare annually, significantly higher than field crop applications, driving demand for water-soluble and liquid fertilizers that can be precisely delivered through fertigation systems.
Spain and Italy together account for a modest share of European fertilizer consumption, with Mediterranean climate conditions and diverse crop portfolios creating demand for specialized products that address soil alkalinity and water stress challenges. Eastern European countries, including Poland, Ukraine, and the Czech Republic, demonstrate the highest growth rates as agricultural modernization and EU accession drive intensification of production practices and adoption of advanced fertilizer technologies.
Competitive Landscape
Top Companies in Europe Fertilizers Market
The Europe fertilizers market displays a fragmented concentration with the top five firms controlling a minor share of the market size. Yara International is among the top players in the market owing to vertically integrated production and a dense distribution lattice. OCI Global is expanding via the acquisition of Fertiglobe’s European assets. EuroChem, CF Industries, and ICL Group round out the top bracket, highlighting fragmentation.
Competitive advantage is shifting toward sustainability credentials and digital agronomy services. Companies invest in renewable-energy ammonia plants to secure low-carbon product portfolios and meet retailer supply-chain targets. Patent activity in polymer coatings and nutrient stabilizers doubled in 2024, evidencing innovation pressure.
Digital platforms offering field-specific recommendations help suppliers lock in input sales and collect data for product development. Regulatory compliance costs favor well-capitalized incumbents, yet regional specialists thrive by tailoring blends to local agronomic nuances.
Europe Fertilizers Industry Leaders
-
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
-
EuroChem Group
-
Yara International ASA
-
OCI Global N.V.
-
ICL Group
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF
Recent Industry Developments
- June 2024: Yara International inaugurated a 24 MW green hydrogen plant at Herøya Industrial Park in Porsgrunn, Norway, developed and built by Linde Engineering. The plant produces around 10,000 kg of renewable hydrogen per day to replace natural gas in ammonia production, reducing approximately 41,000 tons of CO₂ emissions annually. This milestone supports Yara’s transition toward low-carbon fertilizers under its Yara Climate Choice portfolio.
- February 2023: OCI Global and NuStar Energy L.P. have agreed to deliver Ammonia into the Midwest. Through this agreement, OCI Global (“OCI”) to transport ammonia on a new segment of NuStar Pipeline Operating Partnership L.P.’s (“NuStar”) Ammonia Pipeline System. OCI has committed a capital expenditure of USD 30 million to facilitate this project on new ammonia cooling and storage facilities.
Free With This Report
Along with the report, We also offer a comprehensive and exhaustive data pack with 25+ graphs on area under cultivation and average application rate per hectare. The data pack includes Globe, North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and Africa.
List of Tables & Figures
- Figure 1:
- CULTIVATION OF FIELD CROPS IN HECTARE, EUROPE, 2017 - 2022
- Figure 2:
- CULTIVATION OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN HECTARE, EUROPE, 2017 - 2022
- Figure 3:
- CONSUMPTION OF MICRONUTRIENTS BY FIELD CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, EUROPE, 2022
- Figure 4:
- CONSUMPTION OF MICRONUTRIENTS BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, EUROPE, 2022
- Figure 5:
- CONSUMPTION OF PRIMARY NUTRIENTS BY FIELD CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, EUROPE, 2022
- Figure 6:
- CONSUMPTION OF PRIMARY NUTRIENTS BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, EUROPE, 2022
- Figure 7:
- CONSUMPTION OF SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS BY FIELD CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, EUROPE, 2022
- Figure 8:
- CONSUMPTION OF SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, EUROPE, 2022
- Figure 9:
- AGRICULTURAL LAND EQUIPPED FOR IRRIGATION IN HECTARE, EUROPE, 2022
- Figure 10:
- FERTILIZER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 11:
- FERTILIZER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 12:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY TYPE IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 13:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY TYPE IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 14:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 15:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 16:
- COMPLEX FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 17:
- COMPLEX FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 18:
- COMPLEX FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 19:
- STRAIGHT FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY NUTRIENT IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 20:
- STRAIGHT FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY NUTRIENT IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 21:
- STRAIGHT FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY NUTRIENT IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 22:
- STRAIGHT FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY NUTRIENT IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 23:
- MICRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 24:
- MICRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 25:
- MICRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY PRODUCT IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 26:
- MICRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY PRODUCT IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 27:
- BORON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 28:
- BORON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 29:
- BORON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 30:
- COPPER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 31:
- COPPER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 32:
- COPPER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 33:
- IRON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 34:
- IRON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 35:
- IRON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 36:
- MANGANESE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 37:
- MANGANESE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 38:
- MANGANESE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 39:
- MOLYBDENUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 40:
- MOLYBDENUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 41:
- MOLYBDENUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 42:
- ZINC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 43:
- ZINC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 44:
- ZINC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 45:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 46:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 47:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 48:
- NITROGENOUS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 49:
- NITROGENOUS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 50:
- NITROGENOUS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY PRODUCT IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 51:
- NITROGENOUS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY PRODUCT IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 52:
- AMMONIUM NITRATE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 53:
- AMMONIUM NITRATE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 54:
- AMMONIUM NITRATE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 55:
- ANHYDROUS AMMONIA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 56:
- ANHYDROUS AMMONIA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 57:
- ANHYDROUS AMMONIA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 58:
- UREA UREA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 59:
- UREA UREA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 60:
- UREA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 61:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 62:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 63:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 64:
- PHOSPHATIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 65:
- PHOSPHATIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 66:
- PHOSPHATIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY PRODUCT IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 67:
- PHOSPHATIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY PRODUCT IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 68:
- DAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 69:
- DAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 70:
- DAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 71:
- MAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 72:
- MAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 73:
- MAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 74:
- SSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 75:
- SSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 76:
- SSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 77:
- TSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 78:
- TSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 79:
- TSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 80:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 81:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 82:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 83:
- POTASSIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 84:
- POTASSIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 85:
- POTASSIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY PRODUCT IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 86:
- POTASSIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY PRODUCT IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 87:
- MOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 88:
- MOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 89:
- MOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 90:
- SOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 91:
- SOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 92:
- SOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 93:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 94:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 95:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 96:
- SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 97:
- SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 98:
- SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY PRODUCT IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 99:
- SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY PRODUCT IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 100:
- CALCIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 101:
- CALCIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 102:
- CALCIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 103:
- MAGNESIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 104:
- MAGNESIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 105:
- MAGNESIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 106:
- SULFUR FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 107:
- SULFUR FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 108:
- SULFUR FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 109:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY FORM IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 110:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY FORM IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 111:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY FORM IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 112:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 113:
- CONVENTIONAL FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 114:
- CONVENTIONAL FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 115:
- CONVENTIONAL FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 116:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY SPECIALITY TYPE IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 117:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY SPECIALITY TYPE IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 118:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY SPECIALITY TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 119:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY SPECIALITY TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 120:
- CRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 121:
- CRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 122:
- CRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 123:
- LIQUID FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 124:
- LIQUID FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 125:
- LIQUID FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 126:
- SRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 127:
- SRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 128:
- SRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 129:
- WATER SOLUBLE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 130:
- WATER SOLUBLE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 131:
- WATER SOLUBLE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 132:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY APPLICATION MODE IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 133:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY APPLICATION MODE IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 134:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY APPLICATION MODE IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 135:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY APPLICATION MODE IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 136:
- FERTIGATION APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 137:
- FERTIGATION APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 138:
- FERTIGATION APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 139:
- FOLIAR APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 140:
- FOLIAR APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 141:
- FOLIAR APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 142:
- SOIL APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 143:
- SOIL APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 144:
- SOIL APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 145:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY CROP TYPE IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 146:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY CROP TYPE IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 147:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 148:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 149:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY FIELD CROPS IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 150:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY FIELD CROPS IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 151:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 152:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 153:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 154:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 155:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY TURF & ORNAMENTAL IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 156:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY TURF & ORNAMENTAL IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 157:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY TYPE IN %, EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 158:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY COUNTRY IN METRIC TON, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 159:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY COUNTRY IN USD, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 160:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY COUNTRY IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 161:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY COUNTRY IN %, EUROPE, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 162:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, FRANCE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 163:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, FRANCE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 164:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, FRANCE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 165:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, GERMANY, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 166:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, GERMANY, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 167:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, GERMANY, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 168:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, ITALY, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 169:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, ITALY, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 170:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, ITALY, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 171:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, NETHERLANDS, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 172:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, NETHERLANDS, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 173:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, NETHERLANDS, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 174:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, RUSSIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 175:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, RUSSIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 176:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, RUSSIA, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 177:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, SPAIN, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 178:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, SPAIN, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 179:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, SPAIN, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 180:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UKRAINE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 181:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UKRAINE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 182:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UKRAINE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 183:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED KINGDOM, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 184:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED KINGDOM, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 185:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED KINGDOM, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 186:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, REST OF EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 187:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, REST OF EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 188:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, REST OF EUROPE, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 189:
- MOST ACTIVE COMPANIES BY NUMBER OF STRATEGIC MOVES, EUROPE, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 190:
- EUROPE FERTILIZERS MARKET, MOST ADOPTED STRATEGIES, 2018 - 2021
- Figure 191:
- MARKET SHARE OF MAJOR PLAYERS IN %, EUROPE
Europe Fertilizers Market Report Scope
Complex, Straight are covered as segments by Type. Conventional, Speciality are covered as segments by Form. Fertigation, Foliar, Soil are covered as segments by Application Mode. Field Crops, Horticultural Crops, Turf & Ornamental are covered as segments by Crop Type. France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Russia, Spain, Ukraine, United Kingdom are covered as segments by Country.
Type
| Complex | ||
| Straight | Micronutrients | Boron |
| Copper | ||
| Iron | ||
| Manganese | ||
| Molybdenum | ||
| Zinc | ||
| Others | ||
| Nitrogenous | Ammonium Nitrate | |
| Anhydrous Ammonia | ||
| Urea | ||
| Others | ||
| Phosphatic | DAP | |
| MAP | ||
| SSP | ||
| TSP | ||
| Others | ||
| Potassic | MoP | |
| SoP | ||
| Others | ||
| Secondary Macronutrients | Calcium | |
| Magnesium | ||
| Sulfur | ||
Form
| Conventional | |
| Specialty | Controlled-Release Fertilizer (CRF) |
| Liquid Fertilizer | |
| Slow-Release Fertilizer (SRF) | |
| Water-Soluble |
Application Mode
| Fertigation |
| Foliar |
| Soil |
Crop Type
| Field Crops |
| Horticultural Crops |
| Turf and Ornamental |
Geography
| France |
| Germany |
| Italy |
| Netherlands |
| Russia |
| Spain |
| Ukraine |
| United Kingdom |
| Rest of Europe |
| Type | Complex | ||
| Straight | Micronutrients | Boron | |
| Copper | |||
| Iron | |||
| Manganese | |||
| Molybdenum | |||
| Zinc | |||
| Others | |||
| Nitrogenous | Ammonium Nitrate | ||
| Anhydrous Ammonia | |||
| Urea | |||
| Others | |||
| Phosphatic | DAP | ||
| MAP | |||
| SSP | |||
| TSP | |||
| Others | |||
| Potassic | MoP | ||
| SoP | |||
| Others | |||
| Secondary Macronutrients | Calcium | ||
| Magnesium | |||
| Sulfur | |||
| Form | Conventional | ||
| Specialty | Controlled-Release Fertilizer (CRF) | ||
| Liquid Fertilizer | |||
| Slow-Release Fertilizer (SRF) | |||
| Water-Soluble | |||
| Application Mode | Fertigation | ||
| Foliar | |||
| Soil | |||
| Crop Type | Field Crops | ||
| Horticultural Crops | |||
| Turf and Ornamental | |||
| Geography | France | ||
| Germany | |||
| Italy | |||
| Netherlands | |||
| Russia | |||
| Spain | |||
| Ukraine | |||
| United Kingdom | |||
| Rest of Europe | |||
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now
Market Definition
- MARKET ESTIMATION LEVEL - Market Estimations for various types of fertilizers has been done at the product-level and not at the nutrient-level.
- NUTRIENT TYPES COVERED - Primary Nutrients: N, P and K, Secondary Macronutrients: Ca, Mg and S, Micronutients: Zn, Mn, Cu, Fe, Mo, B, and Others
- AVERAGE NUTRIENT APPLICATION RATE - This refers to the average volume of nutrient consumed per hectare of farmland in each country.
- CROP TYPES COVERED - Field Crops: Cereals, Pulses, Oilseeds, and Fiber Crops Horticulture: Fruits, Vegetables, Plantation Crops and Spices, Turf Grass and Ornamentals
| Keyword | Definition |
|---|---|
| Fertilizer | Chemical substance applied to crops to ensure nutritional requirements, available in various forms such as granules, powders, liquid, water soluble, etc. |
| Specialty Fertilizer | Used for enhanced efficiency and nutrient availability applied through soil, foliar, and fertigation. Includes CRF, SRF, liquid fertilizer, and water soluble fertilizers. |
| Controlled-Release Fertilizers (CRF) | Coated with materials such as polymer, polymer-sulfur, and other materials such as resins to ensure nutrient availability to the crop for its entire life cycle. |
| Slow-Release Fertilizers (SRF) | Coated with materials such as sulfur, neem, etc., to ensure nutrient availability to the crop for a longer period. |
| Foliar Fertilizers | Consist of both liquid and water soluble fertilizers applied through foliar application. |
| Water-Soluble Fertilizers | Available in various forms including liquid, powder, etc., used in foliar and fertigation mode of fertilizer application. |
| Fertigation | Fertilizers applied through different irrigation systems such as drip irrigation, micro irrigation, sprinkler irrigation, etc. |
| Anhydrous Ammonia | Used as fertilizer, directly injected into the soil, available in gaseous liquid form. |
| Single Super Phosphate (SSP) | Phosphorus fertilizer containing only phosphorus which has lesser than or equal to 35%. |
| Triple Super Phosphate (TSP) | Phosphorus fertilizer containing only phosphorus greater than 35%. |
| Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers | Fertilizers coated or treated with additional layers of various ingredients to make it more efficient compared to other fertilizers. |
| Conventional Fertilizer | Fertilizers applied to crops through traditional methods including broadcasting, row placement, ploughing soil placement, etc. |
| Chelated Micronutrients | Micronutrient fertilizers coated with chelating agents such as EDTA, EDDHA, DTPA, HEDTA, etc. |
| Liquid Fertilizers | Available in liquid form, majorly used for application of fertilizers to crops through foliar and fertigation. |
Need More Details on Market Definition?
Ask a Question
Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence follows a four-step methodology in all our reports.
- Step-1: IDENTIFY KEY VARIABLES: In order to build a robust forecasting methodology, the variables and factors identified in Step-1 are tested against available historical market numbers. Through an iterative process, the variables required for market forecast are set and the model is built on the basis of these variables.
- Step-2: Build a Market Model: Market-size estimations for the forecast years are in nominal terms. Inflation is not a part of the pricing, and the average selling price (ASP) is kept constant throughout the forecast period for each country.
- Step-3: Validate and Finalize: In this important step, all market numbers, variables and analyst calls are validated through an extensive network of primary research experts from the market studied. The respondents are selected across levels and functions to generate a holistic picture of the market studied.
- Step-4: Research Outputs: Syndicated Reports, Custom Consulting Assignments, Databases & Subscription Platforms
Get More Details On Research Methodology
Download PDF
