Data Center Construction Market Size and Share

Data Center Construction Market Summary
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Data Center Construction Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The data center construction market size stands at USD 300.38 billion in 2026 and is projected to reach USD 431.39 billion by 2031, advancing at a 7.51% CAGR. Surging demand for sovereign-grade compute infrastructure, the rapid rollout of 40 kW–100 kW AI racks, and capital-intensive grid-deposit rules are the decisive forces lifting industry outlays. Developers are prioritizing liquid-cooling expertise, on-site power generation, and powered-land inventory to shave months off delivery schedules. At the same time, mechanical systems are absorbing a rising share of budgets as operators race to meet tightening power-usage-effectiveness thresholds. Competitive intensity is increasing as construction-management majors, colocation landlords, and edge specialists battle for hyperscale contracts that now dominate the data center construction market.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By tier type, Tier 3 facilities led with 56.64% installations in 2025, while Tier 4 builds are expanding at an 8.12% CAGR through 2031.
  • By data-center size, hyperscale campuses captured 58.49% of floor space in 2025 and are advancing at an 8.67% CAGR to 2031.
  • By data-center type, colocation operators held 54.75% revenue in 2025, whereas hyperscalers are growing at a 9.12% CAGR through 2031.
  • By infrastructure category, electrical systems represented 39.95% of 2025 budgets, yet mechanical systems are rising at a 9.31% CAGR through 2031.
  • By geography, North America held 40.65% share in 2025; Asia-Pacific is projected to post the fastest 9.71% CAGR to 2031.

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Tier Type: Fault-Tolerant Tier 4 Builds Gain Traction

Tier 3 assets commanded 56.64% of installations in 2025. Tier 4 builds are scaling at an 8.12% CAGR as financial-services and healthcare buyers demand fault-tolerant uptime. A 2025 study pegged unplanned-outage costs at USD 9 000 per minute, justifying Tier 4 premiums. [3]Publication Staff, “Cost of Data Center Outages Study 2025,” Ponemon Institute, ponemon.org Dual utility feeds limit suitable sites to hubs such as Northern Virginia, Frankfurt, and Singapore. Retrofit projects often add USD 50 million USD 100 million to budgets originally scoped for electrical work alone. Smaller providers continue marketing Tier 3 infrastructure with contractual workarounds that mask the absence of true fault tolerance.

Heightened Tier 4 interest is shifting supply-chain dynamics. Switchgear and chiller vendors prioritize quick-ship inventories for fault-tolerant projects, accelerating lead times by up to three months. Designers increasingly specify modular electrical rooms to speed commissioning, while owners weigh whether to convert Tier 2 sites or exit them entirely.

Data Center Construction Market: Market Share by Tier Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Data Center Size: Hyperscale Dominance Reshapes Supply Chains

Hyperscale campuses held 58.49% of floor space in 2025 and are pushing forward at an 8.67% CAGR. Microsoft allocated USD 80 billion for capital expenditures, with the majority aimed at 50 MW–200 MW builds. Medium builds of 30 MW–50 MW are increasingly delivered as shells energized in 10 MW increments to align capital with lease uptake.

Edge sites under 5 MW prosper near city cores where latency under 10 milliseconds is mandatory for AR/VR and trading workloads. Hyperscale procurement drives global pricing for transformers and immersion tanks, frequently squeezing availability for regional projects. Enterprises, facing higher capex, often opt to migrate workloads to the cloud instead of upgrading on-premise footprints.

By Data Center Type: Hyperscalers Outpace Colocation Growth

Although colocation generated 54.75% of 2025 revenue, hyperscalers are advancing at a 9.12% CAGR through 2031. Equinix and Digital Realty now lease whole buildings to single tenants, pivoting toward wholesale deals. 

Vertical integration allows hyperscalers to self-perform mechanical and electrical trades, trimming per-kW build costs by 20%–30%. Edge data centers of 1 MW–5 MW fill a latency niche that exurban campuses cannot meet. Vapor IO deployed 50 U.S. nodes in 2025 using existing central offices, cutting capex but ceding some infrastructure control.

Data Center Construction Market: Market Share by Data Center Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Infrastructure: Mechanical Systems Outpace Electrical Spend

Electrical systems accounted for 39.95% of 2025 project budgets. Mechanical investments are climbing at a 9.31% CAGR as rack densities breach 10 kW. Direct-to-chip cooling adds USD 200–USD 400 per kW but lowers ongoing electricity bills by up to 40%. 

Rear-door exchangers and immersion tanks enable 100 kW cabinets inside existing footprints, extending site life cycles. Cabinet vendors introduced 60U frames with integrated dripless connectors in 2025. Service providers now sell commissioning packages that guarantee PUE below 1.2 to comply with California Title 24 requirements.

Geography Analysis

North America added 5 GW of capacity in 2025 across Virginia, Texas, and Ohio. Microsoft, Meta, and Google together committed USD 150 billion toward U.S. builds through 2027. Canada’s hydro-rich Quebec and British Columbia attract hyperscalers seeking low-carbon power. Mexico’s Monterrey and Querétaro clusters grow on cross-border fiber, though grid reliability remains a concern.. California’s Title 24 now caps PUE at 1.2, effectively banning air-cooled designs.

Europe’s pipeline centers on Frankfurt, Amsterdam, and London where land hits USD 6 000 per m². Germany’s Renewable Energy Sources Act pushes developers toward on-site solar and batteries. Brexit-driven data sovereignty boosts Tier 4 demand in London and Manchester. France and Spain entice hyperscale projects with tax incentives, though southern grids face capacity shortfalls. The Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, effective 2025, forces Scope 3 carbon disclosures.

Asia-Pacific posts the fastest growth. Chinese state-owned utilities back 2 GW campuses despite export-control limits on AI chips. India expands at double-digit rates as foreign hyperscalers localize to meet data-residency rules. Singapore’s land scarcity drives 30 kW-plus rack densities with liquid cooling standard. South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand attract edge nodes for gaming and streaming. Japan’s aging grid imposes multiyear interconnection delays, nudging demand offshore.

The Middle East and Africa emerge as new hubs. Saudi Arabia’s NEOM allocates 1 GW data-center capacity within a USD 500 billion smart-city plan. Dubai and Abu Dhabi offer tax-free zones and expedited permits aimed at intercontinental colocation. Submarine cables linking Europe and Asia elevate Turkey and Israel as low-latency transit nodes. South Africa, Nigeria, and Egypt see edge build-outs tied to 5G rollouts and cloud gaming.

Data Center Construction Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The market is moderately concentrated.Turner, DPR, and AECOM lock in design-build contracts 24 months before groundbreaking, compressing procurement by up to nine months. Equinix and Digital Realty self-perform mechanical and electrical trades, preserving 15%–20% margins.

Vapor IO places 1 MW–5 MW modules within 10 miles of urban cores, achieving sub-10 ms latency. Powered-land developers like PowerTransitions pre-energize acreage to cut tenant move-in to 90 days. Operators achieving PUE below 1.15 through direct-to-chip cooling save USD 2 million–USD 5 million annually per 10 MW site. Schneider Electric filed 12 modular UPS patents in 2025.

Digital Realty’s 150 MW Virginia campus will integrate NuScale reactors, bypassing a seven-year PJM queue. Keppel Data Centres and Sembcorp plan a 200 MW Singapore site powered by offshore wind, targeting PUE under 1.1. Skanska secured a USD 900 million Ohio contract leveraging low-cost transitional gas power. Strategic moves in 2025 indicate consolidation and regional depth building across the data center construction market.

Data Center Construction Industry Leaders

  1. AECOM

  2. Turner Construction Co.

  3. DPR Construction

  4. Jacobs Solutions Inc.

  5. Skanska AB

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Data Center Construction
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • January 2026: Equinix announced a USD 15 billion plan for 25 new International Business Exchange facilities across Europe and Asia-Pacific through 2028.
  • December 2025: Digital Realty broke ground on a 150 MW Northern Virginia campus featuring NuScale small modular reactors and direct-to-chip cooling for 100 kW racks.
  • November 2025: NTT Global Data Centers acquired three Mumbai and Bangalore sites for USD 800 million, lifting its India footprint to 200 MW.
  • October 2025: Turner Construction secured a USD 1.2 billion design-build contract for a 300 MW Texas hyperscale campus with 500 MW on-site solar.

Table of Contents for Data Center Construction Industry Report

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Growing Cloud Applications, AI and Big Data Workloads
    • 4.2.2 Accelerating Adoption of Hyperscale Facilities
    • 4.2.3 Rising Edge-Computing Build-Outs Near Population Hubs
    • 4.2.4 Renewable-Energy Mandates Shaping Facility Design
    • 4.2.5 Deployment of On-Site Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) to Bypass Grid Constraints
    • 4.2.6 Emergence of “Powered-Land” Speculative Campuses Shortening Pre-Lease Timelines
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Escalating Real-Estate, Installation and Maintenance Cost
    • 4.3.2 Stricter Energy-Consumption and Carbon-Compliance Limits
    • 4.3.3 Shortage of Skilled Labor for Advanced Liquid Cooling
    • 4.3.4 Utility “Take-or-Pay” Deposits Locking Up Capital and Deterring Mid-Tier Developers
  • 4.4 Industry Supply-Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Consumers
    • 4.7.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry
  • 4.8 Key Data Center Statistics
    • 4.8.1 Exhaustive Data Center Operators on Regional Level (in MW)
    • 4.8.2 List of Major Upcoming Data Center Projects Across Various Regions(2025-2030)
    • 4.8.3 CAPEX and OPEX For Data Center Construction
    • 4.8.4 Data Center Power Capacity Absorption In MW, Regions, 2023 and 2024
  • 4.9 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Inclusion in Data Center Construction Across Various Regions
  • 4.10 Regulatory and Compliance Framework
  • 4.11 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market

5. MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 5.1 By Tier Type
    • 5.1.1 Tier 1 and 2
    • 5.1.2 Tier 3
    • 5.1.3 Tier 4
  • 5.2 By Data Center Size
    • 5.2.1 Small
    • 5.2.2 Medium
    • 5.2.3 Large
    • 5.2.4 Hyperscale
  • 5.3 By Data Center Type
    • 5.3.1 Colocation Data Center
    • 5.3.2 Hyperscalers/Cloud Service Provider (CSPs)
    • 5.3.3 Enterprise and Edge Data Center
  • 5.4 By Infrastructure
    • 5.4.1 Electrical Infrastructure
    • 5.4.1.1 Power Distribution Solution
    • 5.4.1.2 Power Backup Solutions
    • 5.4.2 Mechanical Infrastructure
    • 5.4.2.1 Cooling Systems
    • 5.4.2.2 Racks and Cabinets
    • 5.4.2.3 Servers and Storage
    • 5.4.2.4 Other Mechanical Infrastructure
    • 5.4.3 General Construction
    • 5.4.4 Services - Design and Consulting, Integration, Support and Maintenance
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Spain
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 Japan
    • 5.5.4.3 India
    • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.4.5 Australia and New Zealand
    • 5.5.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
    • 5.5.5.1.1 Gulf Cooperation Countries
    • 5.5.5.1.2 Turkey
    • 5.5.5.1.3 Israel
    • 5.5.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.5.5.2 Africa
    • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
    • 5.5.5.2.2 Egypt
    • 5.5.5.2.3 Nigeria
    • 5.5.5.2.4 Rest of Africa

6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Data Center Infrastructure Investment Based on Megawatt (MW) Capacity, 2024 vs 2030
  • 6.5 Data Center Construction Landscape (Key Vendors Listings)
  • 6.6 Company Profiles (includes Global Level Overview, Market Level Overview, Core Segments, Financials as Available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for Key Companies, Products and Services, Recent Developments)
    • 6.6.1 AECOM
    • 6.6.2 Turner Construction Co.
    • 6.6.3 DPR Construction
    • 6.6.4 Jacobs Solutions Inc.
    • 6.6.5 Skanska AB
    • 6.6.6 Balfour Beatty plc
    • 6.6.7 Whiting-Turner Contracting Co.
    • 6.6.8 Hensel Phelps
    • 6.6.9 Fortis Construction Inc.
    • 6.6.10 Goodman Group
    • 6.6.11 PT Jaya Obayashi
    • 6.6.12 Hibiya Engineering Ltd.
    • 6.6.13 Fluor Corporation
    • 6.6.14 Keppel Data Centres Holding
    • 6.6.15 NTT Global Data Centers
    • 6.6.16 Equinix Inc.
    • 6.6.17 Digital Realty Trust Inc.
    • 6.6.18 QTS Realty Trust LLC
    • 6.6.19 China State Construction Engineering Corp.
    • 6.6.20 Larsen and Toubro Ltd.
    • 6.6.21 Bouygues Construction SA
    • 6.6.22 Vinci Energies
    • 6.6.23 Samsung C and T Corporation
    • 6.6.24 Collen Construction Ltd.
    • 6.6.25 Corgan
    • 6.6.26 Mortenson Construction
  • 6.7 List of Data Center Construction Companies

7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-Space and Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Mordor Intelligence defines the data center construction market as the total value of greenfield builds that combine civil works, electrical and mechanical fit-outs, and embedded services needed to deliver an operational facility that can house IT infrastructure. Activity tied only to IT equipment procurement or ongoing facility maintenance is outside this boundary.

Scope Exclusion: Retrofits and cosmetic upgrades of existing data centers are not counted.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Tier Type
    • Tier 1 and 2
    • Tier 3
    • Tier 4
  • By Data Center Size
    • Small
    • Medium
    • Large
    • Hyperscale
  • By Data Center Type
    • Colocation Data Center
    • Hyperscalers/Cloud Service Provider (CSPs)
    • Enterprise and Edge Data Center
  • By Infrastructure
    • Electrical Infrastructure
      • Power Distribution Solution
      • Power Backup Solutions
    • Mechanical Infrastructure
      • Cooling Systems
      • Racks and Cabinets
      • Servers and Storage
      • Other Mechanical Infrastructure
    • General Construction
    • Services - Design and Consulting, Integration, Support and Maintenance
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Australia and New Zealand
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Middle East
        • Gulf Cooperation Countries
        • Turkey
        • Israel
        • Rest of Middle East
      • Africa
        • South Africa
        • Egypt
        • Nigeria
        • Rest of Africa

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

We interviewed project managers at design-build firms, procurement heads at colocation operators in North America, Europe, and India, plus regional permitting consultants. These discussions clarified real build cost per megawatt, grid connection delays, and liquid cooling adoption, letting us fine-tune assumptions uncovered during desk work.

Desk Research

Our analysts first mapped global construction outlays using freely available sources such as the U.S. Census 'Value of Construction Put in Place,' Eurostat building permits, and the Japan MLIT construction statistics. Trade flows for gensets and UPS units were checked through UN Comtrade, while the Uptime Institute Global Data Center Survey and AFCOM State of the Data Center reports offered demand benchmarks. Company filings, contractor 10-Ks, and regional permitting portals then anchored project pipelines. Select paid datasets, including D&B Hoovers for contractor revenues and Dow Jones Factiva for deal news, filled remaining gaps. This list is illustrative, not exhaustive; many additional publications guided validation.

A second pass pulled price indices from the BLS Producer Price Index (electrical gear) and the IMF's metal cost trackers to calibrate cost escalation so our desk findings stayed grounded in current realities.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down model starts with non-residential construction spending and hyperscale capital expenditures, which are then filtered through data center specific penetration ratios. Results are cross-checked bottom up with sampled cost per MW multiplied by announced capacity additions to test reasonableness. Key variables include average build cost per MW, global hyperscale CAPEX, rack density trends, transformer lead times, and regional electricity pricing. Multivariate regression coupled with scenario analysis projects values to 2030, with gaps in bottom up samples bridged by regional cost curves derived from primary interviews.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs pass a three-layer review: automated variance flags, senior analyst peer checks, and a final reconciliation against new permits and CAPEX disclosures. Mordor refreshes every twelve months and re-contacts experts when material events, policy shifts, and major supply chain shocks arise.

Why Mordor's Data Center Construction Baseline Commands Reliability

Published figures can diverge because providers choose different cost baskets, treat mixed-use campuses inconsistently, or lock forecasts to static ASPs. Our disciplined scope selection and yearly refresh reduce those pitfalls.

Key gap drivers include: some studies omit general construction labor; others freeze cost inflation at historical averages; a few exclude edge or self-built hyperscale projects outside North America. Mordor captures all of these elements and validates currency conversions quarterly.

Benchmark comparison

Market SizeAnonymized sourcePrimary gap driver
USD 281.34 B (2025) Mordor Intelligence
USD 240.97 B (2024) Global Consultancy ANarrower infrastructure scope and static cost indices
USD 239.00 B (2025) Industry Journal BExcludes general construction labor, uses fixed ASP per MW
USD 182.51 B (2025) Regional Consultancy CLimited Asia Pacific coverage and outdated hyperscale CAPEX

Taken together, the comparison shows that Mordor's numbers rest on the broadest cost base, live cost escalators, and multi-region coverage, giving decision makers a transparent and repeatable baseline they can trust.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

How fast is spending on new facilities expected to grow through 2031?

Outlays are forecast to expand at a 7.51% CAGR, rising from USD 300.38 billion in 2026 to USD 431.39 billion in 2031.

Which size category adds the most square footage today?

Hyperscale campuses held 58.49% of global floor space in 2025 and are advancing at an 8.67% CAGR, the fastest among all size classes.

Why are Tier 4 builds receiving more attention?

Financial-services and healthcare clients demand fault-tolerant uptime, driving an 8.12% CAGR for Tier 4 facilities despite their 40%–60% capital premium.

What is the primary power challenge facing new projects?

Grid operators now require non-refundable deposits equal to 20% of project cost, locking up USD 50 million–USD 200 million for up to three years.

How are developers meeting stringent energy-efficiency targets?

Many new builds use direct-to-chip or immersion cooling and on-site renewables, enabling sub-1.2 PUE compliance with rules such as California Title 24.

Which regions are emerging beyond the core U.S. and European hubs?

India, Singapore, Saudi Arabia, and the Pacific Northwest show accelerating activity due to favorable power prices, permitting, and local digital-economy growth.

Page last updated on:

Data Center Construction Market Report Snapshots