Clinical Trial Imaging Market Size and Share

Clinical Trial Imaging Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Clinical Trial Imaging Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The clinical trial imaging market size stands at USD 1.32 billion in 2025 and is poised to reach USD 1.90 billion by 2030, advancing at a 7.56% CAGR. This expansion mirrors the surge in global pharmaceutical R&D budgets, the growing use of imaging biomarkers in complex studies, and the steady migration toward AI-enabled data analysis. Oncology and neurology trials dominate demand because they rely on visual endpoints to prove therapeutic value, while decentralized and hybrid trial models are widening access to patient pools and accelerating enrollment timelines. AI adoption is speeding image interpretation, cutting reader variability, and improving protocol compliance across multi-site programs. Consolidation among imaging core laboratories and modality vendors is intensifying as firms bundle hardware, software, and analytics to deliver end-to-end services. Regulatory shifts—most notably the European Union Clinical Trials Regulation (EU CTR)—are harmonizing processes across borders and encouraging standardized imaging workflows.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By product & service, imaging software held 32.33% of the clinical trial imaging market size in 2024, while imaging biomarker development services are projected to climb at a 9.45% CAGR to 2030.
  • By modality, computed tomography commanded 25.23% of the clinical trial imaging market size in 2024; positron emission tomography is advancing at a 9.57% CAGR between 2025-2030.
  • By end-user, pharmaceutical & biotechnology companies captured 48.67% of clinical trial imaging market share in 2024, whereas contract research organizations are anticipated to grow at an 11.10% CAGR to 2030.
  • By therapeutic area, oncology generated 32.56% of the clinical trial imaging market size in 2024, yet rare diseases are forecast to post a 10.34% CAGR through 2030.
  • By trial phase, phase III studies accounted for 41.48% of the clinical trial imaging market size in 2024, while phase I studies are on track for a 10.45% CAGR during 2025-2030.
  • By geography, North America led with 38.54% of clinical trial imaging market share in 2024, yet Asia-Pacific is forecast to expand at an 8.67% CAGR through 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Product & Service: Software Dominance Drives Innovation

Imaging software accounted for 32.33% of the clinical trial imaging market in 2024, cementing its status as the backbone of data flow across global sites. These platforms automate QC, anonymize datasets, and integrate seamlessly with electronic data capture systems, lowering error rates and ensuring consistency. In revenue terms, the segment formed the largest slice of the clinical trial imaging market size, and its influence will grow as AI modules move from pilot to production. The rise of SaaS deployment models is shifting budgets from capex to opex, appealing to small and mid-sized sponsors seeking scalability without heavy infrastructure outlay.

Imaging biomarker development services, meanwhile, are projected to expand at a 9.45% CAGR, reflecting escalating demand for validated, quantitative endpoints capable of persuading regulators and payers. Underpinning this surge are FDA initiatives that underscore the value of imaging biomarkers in accelerated approvals, and the movement toward personalized therapies that require sensitive measures of treatment response. Vendors that fuse software, biomarker science, and regulatory consulting are capturing higher-margin projects, intensifying competition in this growth pocket of the clinical trial imaging market.

Clinical Trial Imaging Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Modality: CT Leadership Faces PET Innovation Challenge

Computed tomography held 25.23% of the clinical trial imaging market in 2024 thanks to its ubiquity, rapid acquisition times, and validated role in solid tumor trials. Its dominance also stems from reimbursement support and wide reader familiarity, factors essential to large phase III studies. Even so, the modality’s share is slowly eroding as sponsors pivot to lower-dose photon-counting systems and hybrid imaging that better resolve soft-tissue changes.

Positron emission tomography is expected to post a 9.57% CAGR through 2030, the fastest among modalities. Growth hinges on a pipeline of novel radiotracers that move beyond glucose metabolism to target cell-surface receptors, hypoxia markers, and amyloid aggregates. PET’s sensitivity in detecting molecular changes ahead of anatomical shifts makes it invaluable for early dose-response studies and adaptive trial designs. The spread of total-body PET scanners, which cut dose and bolster throughput, further sharpens its appeal and enlarges its role within the clinical trial imaging market.

By End-User: Pharma Dominance Meets CRO Acceleration

Pharmaceutical and biotechnology sponsors generated 48.67% of clinical trial imaging market revenue in 2024 by directly funding core lab contracts, technology licenses, and equipment leases tied to their R&D portfolios. Their in-house imaging groups oversee protocol development and vendor management but increasingly partner with technology suppliers to integrate AI and cloud delivery. The expansion of GLP-1 and monoclonal antibody pipelines keeps imaging budgets robust, especially for metabolic, cardiovascular, and oncology programs.

Contract research organizations are the fastest-growing constituency, projected at an 11.10% CAGR through 2030. CROs absorb imaging responsibilities for small to mid-tier biotechs that lack internal expertise, and they offer global site networks, standardized SOPs, and consolidated data hubs. Strategic acquisitions—such as Clario’s purchase of NeuroRx—broaden therapeutic specialization and strengthen neurology capabilities, allowing CROs to capture emerging rare-disease opportunities poised to reshape the clinical trial imaging market.

By Therapeutic Area: Oncology Leads While Rare Diseases Surge

Oncology contributed 32.56% of clinical trial imaging market revenue in 2024, cementing its primacy due to the modality-intensive nature of solid tumor assessments. RECIST metrics, bone lesion detection, and theranostic radiopharmaceuticals make imaging indispensable throughout oncology drug lifecycles. Immuno-oncology combinations and tissue-agnostic indications continue to propel imaging demand, with total-body PET and AI-assisted CT enabling earlier response readouts that inform mid-study dose adjustments.

Rare diseases, however, will outpace all other segments at a 10.34% CAGR because regulatory incentives and smaller patient pools magnify the utility of sensitive imaging biomarkers. NIH funding schemes encourage biomarker validation for conditions such as Friedreich’s ataxia and Huntington’s disease, prompting institutions like Biospective to develop sub-millimeter MRI protocols tailored to these populations. Precision endpoints derived from high-resolution neuroimaging reduce trial sizes and attenuate placebo effects, positioning this niche for outsized influence on the clinical trial imaging market.

Clinical Trial Imaging Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Phase of Clinical Trial: Phase III Dominance Meets Phase I Innovation

Phase III programs consumed 41.48% of clinical trial imaging market outlays in 2024 because pivotal studies require global site harmonization, blinded independent central review, and rigorous archiving to satisfy regulators. These late-stage budgets accommodate multiple modalities, repeat scanning, and data locks synchronized to interim analyses, all of which inflate imaging spend. Sponsors also commission endpoint adjudication committees and duplicate reads to shore up data integrity ahead of marketing authorization submissions.

Phase I studies are forecast to register a 10.45% CAGR through 2030 as imaging biomarkers shift upstream to guide dose selection and patient stratification. Whole-organ perfusion MRI, dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, and molecular PET enable non-invasive quantification of early pharmacodynamic signals, reducing reliance on invasive biopsies. AI-driven image analysis accelerates read turnaround, allowing real-time dose-escalation decisions in adaptive study designs. Together, these developments will enlarge the proportion of early-phase resources devoted to imaging and bolster innovation across the clinical trial imaging market.

Geography Analysis

North America retained 38.54% of global revenue in 2024 on the strength of mature reimbursement systems, a dense network of academic-industrial partnerships, and clear FDA guidance governing imaging endpoints. The United States also hosts many of the top 20 pharma sponsors, amplifying domestic demand for high-throughput core labs that can scale across therapeutic franchises. Private-equity investments and acquisitions—RadNet spent USD 54 million on targets in 2024—are consolidating imaging capacity and integrating AI platforms, deepening the region’s competitive moat.

Asia-Pacific is projected to deliver the highest regional CAGR at 8.67% through 2030, propelled by streamlined ethics approvals and attractive cost structures. Regulatory agencies in Japan, South Korea, and Singapore routinely finalize clinical trial applications within six months, shortening study start-up compared with legacy markets. Local CROs such as Wuxi AppTec have scaled imaging units that serve domestic and Western sponsors alike, leveraging broad site networks and government incentives to host multinational programs. The growing popularity of decentralized trials, tele-radiology, and bring-your-own-device imaging apps augments APAC’s role in the clinical trial imaging market.

Europe sits between these poles as it transitions to the EU CTR, which mandates full use of the Clinical Trials Information System by January 2025. The unified portal promises consistent application reviews across 30 countries and should lower administrative overhead on cross-border imaging protocols. Yet divergent rules governing radiopharmaceutical handling and data privacy remain obstacles, particularly in Germany and France. Efforts by the EMA to publish an AI reflection paper and clarify validation expectations indicate that Europe aims to retain a leadership position in governance even as operational execution evolves.

Clinical Trial Imaging Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

The clinical trial imaging market features moderate fragmentation, with the top five suppliers controlling an estimated 45-50% of global revenue. Competitive intensity is rising as equipment manufacturers move upstream into software and analytics, while CROs push downstream into modality ownership to secure margin and lock in clients. Clario, ICON Medical Imaging, and IXICO are global benchmarks thanks to therapeutic breadth, proprietary platforms, and geographic reach. Their differentiation hinges on integrated AI algorithms that normalize data from disparate scanners and automate volumetric reads across oncology, neurology, and cardiology domains.

Strategic M&A is reshaping the field. GE HealthCare’s acquisition of MIM Software adds AI-powered 3D segmentation and dosimetry tools to its platform, enabling seamless workflows from scanner to analytics. RadNet’s USD 103 million iCAD deal deepens breast-imaging AI capability and illustrates a broader pattern of modality specialists acquiring algorithm developers to protect future revenue streams. Clario’s purchase of NeuroRx sharpens its focus on neurodegenerative research by absorbing advanced fMRI and PET infrastructure, while ONRAD’s takeover of Direct Radiology creates the largest independent teleradiology network in the United States, a boon for remote trial oversight.

White-space opportunities lie in blockchain-secured image repositories, which promise tamper-proof audit trails suited to regulatory audits, and in end-to-end decentralized imaging kits that pair portable scanners with cloud-native AI readers. Vendors able to wrap these capabilities into flexible, region-compliant service offerings stand to capture premium contracts as sponsors demand turnkey solutions throughout the clinical trial imaging market.

Clinical Trial Imaging Industry Leaders

  1. Clario

  2. Icon plc

  3. Parexel International Corp.

  4. Medpace Holdings, Inc.

  5. Siemens Healthineers AG

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Clinical Trial Imaging Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Recent Industry Developments

  • June 2025: HOPPR secured USD 31.5 million to expand its AI medical imaging development platform, signaling investor confidence in advanced analytics for clinical trials.
  • April 2025: Chipiron raised USD 17 million to commercialize a portable MRI scanner, potentially eliminating siting barriers for remote trial imaging.
  • April 2025: RadNet agreed to acquire iCAD for USD 103 million in an all-stock transaction, enhancing AI-based breast-imaging services.
  • March 2025: Clario purchased NeuroRx to strengthen neuro-imaging capabilities for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s studies.
  • January 2025: ONRAD acquired Direct Radiology from Philips, forming the largest U.S. teleradiology provider and expanding remote imaging oversight capacity.

Table of Contents for Clinical Trial Imaging Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Increasing Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology R&D Expenditure
    • 4.2.2 Growing Outsourcing of Imaging Services to Contract Research Organizations
    • 4.2.3 Technological Advancements in Medical Imaging Modalities
    • 4.2.4 Rising Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Trial Imaging
    • 4.2.5 Growth in Oncology and Neurology Clinical Trials
    • 4.2.6 Expansion of Decentralized and Hybrid Clinical Trial Models
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 High Capital Investment and Operational Costs of Imaging Equipment
    • 4.3.2 Shortage of Skilled Imaging Professionals
    • 4.3.3 Stringent Regulatory and Data Privacy Requirements
    • 4.3.4 Lack of Standardized Imaging Protocols Across Trial Sites
  • 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.5 Porter's Five Forces
    • 4.5.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
    • 4.5.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.5.4 Threat of Substitute Products
    • 4.5.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

  • 5.1 By Product & Service
    • 5.1.1 Trial Design Consulting Services
    • 5.1.2 Read Analysis Services
    • 5.1.3 Operational Imaging Services
    • 5.1.4 Imaging Software
    • 5.1.5 Imaging Data-management Services
    • 5.1.6 Imaging Biomarker Development Services
  • 5.2 By Modality
    • 5.2.1 Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    • 5.2.2 Computed Tomography
    • 5.2.3 Positron Emission Tomography
    • 5.2.4 Ultrasound
    • 5.2.5 Echocardiography
    • 5.2.6 Other Modalities
  • 5.3 By End-User
    • 5.3.1 Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies
    • 5.3.2 Contract Research Organizations
    • 5.3.3 Medical Device Manufacturers
    • 5.3.4 Academic & Government Research Institutes
  • 5.4 By Therapeutic Area
    • 5.4.1 Oncology
    • 5.4.2 Neurology
    • 5.4.3 Cardiology
    • 5.4.4 Endocrinology & Metabolic Disorders
    • 5.4.5 Rare Diseases
    • 5.4.6 Other Therapeutic Areas
  • 5.5 By Phase of Clinical Trial
    • 5.5.1 Phase I
    • 5.5.2 Phase II
    • 5.5.3 Phase III
    • 5.5.4 Phase IV
  • 5.6 Geography
    • 5.6.1 North America
    • 5.6.1.1 United States
    • 5.6.1.2 Canada
    • 5.6.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.6.2 Europe
    • 5.6.2.1 Germany
    • 5.6.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.6.2.3 France
    • 5.6.2.4 Italy
    • 5.6.2.5 Spain
    • 5.6.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.6.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.3.1 China
    • 5.6.3.2 Japan
    • 5.6.3.3 India
    • 5.6.3.4 Australia
    • 5.6.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.6.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.4 Middle East & Africa
    • 5.6.4.1 GCC
    • 5.6.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.6.4.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • 5.6.5 South America
    • 5.6.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.6.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.6.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Business Segments, Financials, Headcount, Key Information, Market Rank, Market Share, Products and Services, and analysis of Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Clario
    • 6.3.2 Icon plc
    • 6.3.3 IXICO plc
    • 6.3.4 Parexel International Corp.
    • 6.3.5 Medpace Holdings, Inc.
    • 6.3.6 Navitas Clinical Research
    • 6.3.7 WorldCare Clinical LLC
    • 6.3.8 Radiant Sage LLC
    • 6.3.9 Resonance Health
    • 6.3.10 WCG (WIRB-Copernicus Group)
    • 6.3.11 Siemens Healthineers AG
    • 6.3.12 GE HealthCare Technologies Inc.
    • 6.3.13 Calyx
    • 6.3.14 Signant Health
    • 6.3.15 Imaging Endpoints
    • 6.3.16 Perspectum Diagnostics
    • 6.3.17 BioClinica Inc.
    • 6.3.18 Collective Minds Research (CMRAD)

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the clinical trial imaging market as all paid services and software that plan, acquire, manage, and read medical images expressly for human interventional and observational drug or device trials. The count covers centralized imaging core labs, cloud-based workflow platforms, biomarker development services, and related analytics that translate images into trial endpoints.

Scope exclusion: Capital purchases of imaging scanners used mainly for routine diagnosis or pre-clinical animal studies are excluded.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Product & Service
    • Trial Design Consulting Services
    • Read Analysis Services
    • Operational Imaging Services
    • Imaging Software
    • Imaging Data-management Services
    • Imaging Biomarker Development Services
  • By Modality
    • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    • Computed Tomography
    • Positron Emission Tomography
    • Ultrasound
    • Echocardiography
    • Other Modalities
  • By End-User
    • Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies
    • Contract Research Organizations
    • Medical Device Manufacturers
    • Academic & Government Research Institutes
  • By Therapeutic Area
    • Oncology
    • Neurology
    • Cardiology
    • Endocrinology & Metabolic Disorders
    • Rare Diseases
    • Other Therapeutic Areas
  • By Phase of Clinical Trial
    • Phase I
    • Phase II
    • Phase III
    • Phase IV
  • Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • Australia
      • South Korea
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East & Africa
      • GCC
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Mordor analysts interviewed imaging scientists at global pharma sponsors, project managers within imaging core labs, CRO procurement leads, and radiology chiefs at major academic sites across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. The conversations clarified price dispersion, protocol complexity trends, and modality preferences, which we used to tighten model assumptions and cross-check desk findings.

Desk Research

We pulled foundation data from open statistics issued by the US National Library of Medicine's ClinicalTrials.gov, the European Clinical Trials Register, and Japan's PMDA trial database, which list trials that mandate imaging. Trade bodies such as the Medical Imaging & Technology Alliance and the Association of Clinical Research Organizations offered annual trend briefs on imaging outsourcing. Regulatory guidance notes from the US FDA and EMA, combined with peer-reviewed articles in Radiology and The Lancet Digital Health, helped our analysts map accepted imaging endpoints. Paid feeds from D&B Hoovers and Dow Jones Factiva supplied company revenue splits for leading imaging core labs. This list is illustrative; many further public and paid references informed desk validation.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

Our bottom-up build multiplies the number of actively recruiting trials by average images per patient and contracted price per image set, which are then rolled up by phase and therapy area. A parallel top-down pass benchmarks global sponsor spending on clinical services and estimates the imaging slice by modality share. Key variables include trial starts by phase, average imaging sessions per patient, modality mix shifts toward PET and MRI, outsourcing penetration into iCROs, and prevailing image read turnaround times. We forecast with a multivariate regression that factors oncology trial growth, R&D spending, and regulatory cycle times. Where bottom-up data were thin, we back-solved values from published core-lab revenues and adjusted with price insights from primary calls.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs run through variance checks against historical spend ratios and public filings before senior review. Reports refresh annually, with mid-cycle updates if material events such as large M&A or new FDA imaging guidance alter the baseline.

Why Our Clinical Trial Imaging Baseline Inspires Confidence

Published estimates often diverge because firms vary service scope, treat scanner sales as market revenue, or apply different currency years.

Key gap drivers include Mordor's trial-level build versus others' revenue extrapolations, our exclusion of diagnostic equipment sales, and our yearly refresh cadence that captures emerging decentralized imaging workflows.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 1.32 B (2025) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 1.23 B (2024) Global Consultancy A Omits software licensing and Asia Pacific trials, leading to understated base
USD 1.42 B (2024) Industry Association B Adds imaging hardware procurement and hybrid pre-clinical work, inflating total

The comparison shows that when scope aligns strictly with in-trial imaging services and software, our balanced bottom-up and top-down approach delivers a transparent, repeatable baseline that decision-makers can trust.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the clinical trial imaging market?

The clinical trial imaging market is valued at USD 1.32 billion in 2025 and is forecast to grow to USD 1.90 billion by 2030 at a 7.56% CAGR.

Which product segment leads the market?

Imaging software holds the largest share at 32.33% because it underpins standardized data capture, QC, and AI analytics across global sites.

Why is Asia-Pacific the fastest-growing region?

Streamlined ethics approvals, lower study costs, and strong government support are driving an 8.67% CAGR in Asia-Pacific through 2030.

How is AI influencing clinical trial imaging?

Asia Pacific is estimated to grow at the highest CAGR over the forecast period (2025-2030).

Which modality is expanding the fastest?

Positron emission tomography is set to grow at a 9.57% CAGR due to novel radiotracers and total-body scanner adoption that improve sensitivity and lower radiation dose.

What is the main restraint facing the market?

High capital and operational costs of advanced imaging equipment, especially PET-MRI and photon-counting CT systems, limit entry for smaller centers and raise overall trial expenses.

Page last updated on:

Clinical Trial Imaging Report Snapshots