Australia Water Treatment Chemicals Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Australia Water Treatment Chemicals Market size is estimated at USD 502.71 million in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 643.74 million by 2030, at a CAGR of 5.07% during the forecast period (2025-2030). The pace reflects nationwide investments in drought-proof infrastructure, stricter discharge permits, and the rapid scaling of lithium-battery metals refining. Utilities are allocating multi-billion-dollar budgets to nutrient removal and PFAS compliance, while mining operators retrofit circuits for closed-loop recycling. Power generators are moving coal-ash facilities to zero-liquid-discharge, creating a steady demand for corrosion inhibitors, antiscalants, and advanced oxidants. Chemical formulators are, however, contending with caustic-soda and hydrochloric-acid price swings that squeeze operating margins.
Key Report Takeaways
- By product type, corrosion and scale inhibitors led with 26.75% of the Australia water treatment chemicals market share in 2024, while biocides are growing at a CAGR of 5.29%.
- By end-user industry, the municipal segment held 39.52% revenue in 2024 and is projected to expand at a 5.57% CAGR to 2030.
Australia Water Treatment Chemicals Market Trends and Insights
Driver Impact Analysis
| Drivers | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tightening nutrient-discharge caps on WWTPs | +0.8% | National; early roll-out in NSW and Victoria | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Coal-station ash dams shifting to ZLD | +0.6% | NSW, Queensland, Victoria coal regions | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Desalination plant refurbishments and expansion | +0.9% | Coastal states, notably SA, WA, Victoria | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Growth of lithium-battery metals refining | +0.7% | Western Australia expanding into SA and Queensland | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Ageing urban distribution networks | +0.5% | Major metropolitan areas nationwide | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Tightening Nutrient-Discharge Caps on Municipal WWTP Licences
The National Health and Medical Research Council cut allowable PFOS in potable water to 8 ng/L in 2025, forcing utilities to re-engineer polishing steps and adopt higher-grade coagulants and flocculants[1]National Health and Medical Research Council, “NHMRC Review of PFAS in Australian Drinking Water,” nhmrc.gov.au. Sydney Water responded by deploying mobile PFAS systems at the Cascade plant, demonstrating the immediate operational adjustments utilities must now make. Lower nutrient thresholds also target algal-bloom hotspots, requiring optimized dosing regimes that balance residual disinfectant demand against formation of by-products. This regulatory squeeze elevates demand for low-aluminum coagulants and organophosphate-free corrosion inhibitors compatible with tightened caps. Formulators supplying polyacrylamide and specialty polymers are scaling local capacity to shorten lead times and ensure specification consistency. Utilities that can simultaneously hit lower limits and curb chemical usage are set to win future performance-based contracts.
Accelerating Shift of Coal-Fired Power-Station Ash Dams to Zero-Liquid-Discharge
EPA NSW tightened oversight of legacy coal-ash repositories at Lake Macquarie, prompting power generators to eliminate discharge pathways and recycle all process water[2]New South Wales Environment Protection Authority, “Coal ash and coal ash repositories,” epa.nsw.gov.au. CS Energy highlighted in its 2024 report that ash-dam chemistry now carries board-level risk, linking asset uptime to reliable water treatment. Operators install multi-stage filtration, thickening, and advanced oxidation to concentrate brines for crystallizer feed, a flowsheet that relies on robust antiscalants and high-temperature corrosion inhibitors. The transition raises demand for iron-complexing agents and heavy-metal precipitants to prevent leachate excursions. As older units shut down, chemical procurement shifts from base-load consumption to project-based spikes tied to dam remediation works, altering distributor inventory strategies.
Rising Desalination Plant Refurbishments and Expansions
The Wonthaggi plant in Victoria restarted in 2025, bringing 500 MLD of standby capacity online and triggering fresh antiscalant offtake orders. South Australia’s Northern Water proposal, Australia’s largest single desalination investment at USD 5 billion, envisions 260 MLD for mining and communities, with a 600-kilometer pipeline that multiplies corrosion-inhibitor demand along its length. Reverse-osmosis trains need low-fouling biocides and membrane cleaners to sustain 45% recoveries in warm estuarine feeds. Brine streams face tougher marine-discharge rules, pushing operators toward proprietary precipitation aids that minimize density plumes. Suppliers able to integrate real-time dosing analytics with chemical delivery platforms gain service-contract advantages as state water corporations prioritize resilience and energy optimization.
Growth of Lithium-Ion Battery Metals Refining Hubs
Albemarle’s Kemerton facility exemplifies Australia’s move from ore export to hydroxide production, increasing process-water recirculation intensity and chemical variability. The firm’s pledge to cut freshwater use 25% by 2030 accelerates uptake of high-efficiency flocculants, chelating agents, and pH-adjusters that stabilize brine-evaporation stages. Lithium circuits generate concentrated sulfate streams that must meet strict discharge specifications before blending with seawater, requiring selective precipitation chemistries. Regional refineries also adopt boron removal media to hit export-grade product specs, adding a niche yet fast-growing chemical segment. Equipment suppliers who pair metallurgy expertise with water-chemistry advisory services are capturing bundled contracts for new spodumene-conversion projects.
Restraint Impact Analysis
| Restraints | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electro-oxidation and UV-AOP alternatives | -0.4% | Advanced facilities in major cities | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Bulk caustic and HCl pricing volatility | -0.3% | National; all treatment facilities | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| PFAS-based defoamer and surfactant bans | -0.2% | National rollout from July 2025 | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Emerging Electro-Oxidation and UV-AOP as Chemical-Free Alternatives
Bias-enhanced TiO₂ electro-photocatalysis achieved 640% higher PFAS destruction in saline matrices compared with traditional methods, signalling a viable path to reduce chemical footprints. The Water and Carbon Group invested USD 14.5 million to commercialize the LEEF System, evidencing rising private capital interest in high-energy but low-reagent technologies. Municipal pilots target hotspot contaminants where disposables such as powdered activated carbon prove cost-prohibitive. While power costs and electrode life currently limit scale-up, successful integration with onsite renewables could shift future procurement away from oxidizing biocides and defoamers. Chemical suppliers are hedging by adding equipment portfolios or forming service alliances to participate in hybrid treatment trains.
Restrictions on PFAS-Based Defoamers and Surfactants
The July 2025 national ban eliminates perfluoro-surfactants from polymerization and foam-control formulations, compelling rapid reformulation. Desalination and reverse-osmosis sites depend on low-foaming cleaners; vendors now pivot to silicon-based and alkyl-ether alternatives that must match prior performance at elevated temperature and salinity. Early adopters testing replacements report higher dosing to achieve equivalent collapse rates, potentially offsetting cost per kilogram parity. Adoption pressures intensify across power-station flue-gas scrubbers where PFAS wetting agents were preferred for their high-temperature stability. Intellectual-property barriers favor multinational incumbents with dedicated research and development pipelines, marginalizing smaller blenders that relied on imported PFAS components.
Segment Analysis
By Product Type: Corrosion Control Drives Market Leadership
Corrosion and scale inhibitors generated 26.75% of the Australian water treatment chemicals market size in 2024 on the back of aggressive groundwater chemistry and widespread steel infrastructure. Phosphate-based blends remain dominant in potable networks, while phosphonate-polymer hybrids protect high-pressure boiler lines in mining and power assets. Growth persists as desalination projects specify low-zinc antiscalants to meet marine-discharge permits. Biocides and disinfectants posted the quickest trajectory at 5.29% CAGR through 2030, benefiting from amplified pathogen control in recycled-water schemes and stricter residual targets in long pipelines. Innovations include stabilized bromine donors and isothiazolinone blends that function across brackish salinities.
Municipalities diversify chemical risk via multi-supplier contracts, yet rely on a narrow group of ISO-certified vendors for NSF/ANSI 60 compliance. Coagulants and flocculants retain a a steady share in sludge-dewatering and tailings filtration. The Australian water treatment chemicals market sees specialty polyacrylamide demand rise as lithium refineries optimize solid-liquid separation in spodumene conversion.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By End-User Industry: Municipal Dominance Reflects Infrastructure Investment
Municipal utilities commanded 39.52% of Australia water treatment chemicals market share in 2024. The segment advances at 5.57% CAGR thanks to a policy that couples drought planning with water-reuse expansion. Projects integrate PFAS removal, nutrient stripping, and disinfection-by-product control, each layer adding chemical complexity. Utilities also pilot digital dosing platforms, rewarding suppliers that package products with sensor-enabled service.
Power generation ranks second, propelled by zero-liquid-discharge conversions that intensify antiscalant and evaporator chemistry demand. Mining and mineral processing sustain double-digit chemical consumption per cubic meter due to variable tailings chemistries and metal-selective precipitation stages. Oil and gas drills deploy sulfate-removal units and produced-water polishers, relying on high-efficiency scale inhibitors to maintain uptime. Food and beverage processors adopt membrane bioreactors, achieving 96% contaminant removal, boosting biocide and membrane-cleaning volumes. Although pulp and paper retain a small footprint, their effluent toxicity thresholds necessitate bespoke retention aids, sustaining niche demand for cationic polymers.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Geography Analysis
New South Wales water treatment chemicals market is anchored by Sydney’s population density and progressive PFAS and coal-ash directives. Tightening licences spur high-purity coagulant uptake and premium antiscalant usage across Prospect, Warragamba, and Shoalhaven supply networks. Complementary industrial consumption arises from diversified manufacturing, including biopharmaceutical and food hubs that require ultra-pure process water.
The Queensland market is growing owing to extensive coal mining, LNG processing, and agricultural irrigation schemes that depend on large-volume chemical dosing. The state’s coal seam gas water is high in bicarbonate and heavy metals, compelling complex precipitation and pH-conditioning programs. Regional councils along the Fitzroy and Burdekin basins invest in nutrient-reduction projects, broadening municipal chemical requisitions.
Scarce freshwater encourages desalination reliance at Binningup and Kwinana, each demanding sophisticated membrane-protection blends. Victoria and South Australia jointly contribute 15%; Victoria’s Wonthaggi restart and South Australia’s Northern Water megaproject elevate antiscalant and pipeline corrosion-inhibitor demand.
Competitive Landscape
The market is moderately fragmented. Suppliers with broad portfolios reduce lead-time risk during commodity shortages. Ecolab expanded footprints by acquiring Barclay Water Management for USD 50 million, augmenting digital analytics that deliver predictive corrosion monitoring for hospitals and data centers. Competitive rivalry intensifies as utilities embed ESG metrics in procurement, favoring suppliers that quantify greenhouse-gas intensity per kilogram of chemical delivered. Domestic players counter through agile onsite support and familiarity with Australian Standards. Vendor selection increasingly weighs total cost of ownership, pushing price-led competitors to couple chemical sales with value-added process optimization.
Australia Water Treatment Chemicals Industry Leaders
-
Ecolab
-
Solenis
-
SNF
-
Ixom
-
Kemira
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- January 2025: ACCIONA secured a USD 322 million contract to build Sydney Water’s Prospect Pre-Treatment Plant, incorporating 500 MLD capacity and advanced chemical-storage systems
- May 2024: SNF completed a USD 18 million renovation of its Lara polyacrylamide plant, boosting supply for mining and municipal clients.
Australia Water Treatment Chemicals Market Report Scope
Water treatment is a process that extracts or reduces the level of pollutants and undesirable components from water to make it suitable for use. The chemicals used in this method are referred to as water treatment chemicals. Algicide, chlorine, and chlorine dioxide are some examples of water treatment chemicals.
The water treatment chemicals market is segmented by product type and end-user industry. By product type, the market is segmented into biocides and disinfectants, coagulants and flocculants, corrosion and scale inhibitors, defoamers and defoaming agents, pH conditioners/adjusters, and other product types. By end-user industry, the market is segmented into power generation, oil and gas, chemical manufacturing, mining and mineral processing, municipal, food and beverage, pulp and paper, and other end-user industries. For each segment, the market sizing and forecasts have been done on the basis of value (USD).
| Biocides and Disinfectants |
| Coagulants and Flocculants |
| Corrosion and Scale Inhibitors |
| Defoamers and Defoaming Agents |
| pH Conditioners/Adjusters |
| Other Product Types |
| Power Generation |
| Oil and Gas |
| Chemical Manufacturing |
| Mining and Mineral Processing |
| Municipal |
| Food and Beverage |
| Pulp and Paper |
| Other End-user Industries |
| By Product Type | Biocides and Disinfectants |
| Coagulants and Flocculants | |
| Corrosion and Scale Inhibitors | |
| Defoamers and Defoaming Agents | |
| pH Conditioners/Adjusters | |
| Other Product Types | |
| By End-user Industry | Power Generation |
| Oil and Gas | |
| Chemical Manufacturing | |
| Mining and Mineral Processing | |
| Municipal | |
| Food and Beverage | |
| Pulp and Paper | |
| Other End-user Industries |
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the current value of the Australia water treatment chemicals market?
The market is valued at USD 502.71 million in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 643.74 million by 2030.
Which segment leads demand for treatment chemicals?
Municipal utilities led with 39.52% share in 2024, driven by large-scale infrastructure upgrades and tighter discharge licences.
Which product category is growing the fastest?
Biocides and disinfectants are advancing at a 5.29% CAGR through 2030 owing to stronger pathogen-control requirements.
How are lithium refineries influencing chemical demand?
New lithium-hydroxide plants in Western Australia are expanding needs for brine treatment, metal precipitation and closed-loop water-recycling chemistries.
What impact will the 2025 PFAS ban have?
The ban removes PFAS-based defoamers and surfactants, pushing suppliers to silicon- and alkyl-ether alternatives and prompting utilities to reassess cleaner formulations.
Page last updated on: