United States Telecom Towers Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The United States Telecom Towers Market size is estimated at USD 7.33 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 8.99 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 4.19% during the forecast period (2025-2030). In terms of installed base, the market is expected to grow from 164.78 thousand units in 2025 to 202.03 thousand units by 2030, at a CAGR of 4.16% during the forecast period (2025-2030).
Long-term growth hinges on densifying mid-band and C-band 5G rather than erecting large volumes of new structures, so operators are extracting more revenue from existing assets through advanced antenna systems and multi-tenant lease-up. Independent tower companies have scaled fastest, helped by carrier asset divestitures that recycle capital into spectrum. Energy modernization, particularly solar-hybrid power, is another structural tailwind as fuel cost volatility and environmental rules accelerate renewable deployments. Simultaneously, favorable federal tax incentives and defense-funded Open-RAN pilots keep capital flowing into modernization projects even as borrowing rates stay elevated.
Key Report Takeaways
- By ownership, independent tower companies held 75.48% the United States telecom towers market share in 2024 while expanding at a 4.72% CAGR through 2030.
- By installation, ground-based sites captured 74.71% of the United States telecom towers market size in 2024; rooftop deployments are forecast to advance at a 5.32% CAGR to 2030.
- By fuel type, renewable-powered sites are expected to grow at a 13.39% CAGR through 2030, despite grid/diesel hybrids retaining a 63.40% revenue share of the United States telecom towers market size in 2024.
- By tower type, monopoles led with 60.28% share of the United States telecom towers market size in 2024, while stealth designs exhibit the fastest 6.94% CAGR through 2030.
United States Telecom Towers Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5G mid-band and C-band densification wave | +1.8% | National, urban metros | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| IRS “safe-harbor” bonus depreciation on tower upgrades | +0.7% | National | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| DoD Open-RAN pilot funding across military bases | +0.4% | Military bases nationwide | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| T-Mobile and Crown Castle 12-yr master-lease renewal | +0.3% | National | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Fiber-to-Tower tax credits in CHIPS and Science Act | +0.5% | Rural emphasis | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| State-level net-metering for solar-hybrid power | +0.2% | CA, TX, WY | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
5G Mid-Band and C-Band Densification Wave
Carriers are channeling roughly USD 35 billion of 2025 capex into 3.5 GHz and C-band upgrades that bolt additional antennas, radios, and power systems onto existing structures rather than funding green-field builds. This shift allows tower companies with proven modification expertise to command higher amendment rents and quicker tenant additions. T-Mobile’s rapid deployment of ex-Sprint mid-band spectrum exemplifies how densification generates fresh revenue streams across thousands of co-located sites. The emphasis on site upgrades keeps the United States telecom towers market growing, even where new construction is zoning-constrained. Engineering complexity also raises switching barriers for carriers, reinforcing long leases and predictable cash flows for leading tower REITs.
IRS “Safe-Harbor” Bonus Depreciation
Accelerated depreciation lets tower owners expense a large share of upgrade costs in year one, boosting after-tax returns and freeing cash for additional projects. Independent operators pass part of this benefit to carrier tenants through competitive rent escalators, thereby strengthening their value proposition versus self-owned towers. Qualifying assets extend beyond steel and concrete to fiber backhaul, batteries, and environmental hardening, making the incentive relevant across multiple upgrade waves. The policy particularly supports rural sites where revenue per tenant is lower, yet modernization costs remain fixed, sustaining nationwide momentum for the United States telecom towers market.
DoD Open-RAN Pilot Funding
The Department of Defense is directing USD 179 million toward private 5G pilots that require hardened, security-cleared infrastructure on military bases. Verizon, for instance, will modernize 85% of Air Force bases using shared passive assets, creating specialized lease opportunities. Because federal contracting demands stringent compliance, established tower companies with existing government credentials enjoy an incumbent advantage. Open-RAN architectures promoted under these pilots could later permeate commercial networks, expanding addressable modification revenue for the United States telecom towers market.
Fiber-to-Tower tax credits in CHIPS and Science Act
The CHIPS and Science Act extends 25% investment tax credits to photonic components and optical cables essential for high-capacity backhaul. Infinera and Corning have secured USD 93 million and USD 32 million, respectively, to scale production of tower-grade optics, cutting the all-in cost of fiber extensions. Lower backhaul costs render suburban and rural sites economically viable for high-throughput services such as fixed wireless access and edge computing. As a result, the United States telecom towers market gains incremental nodes without waiting for traditional return thresholds.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Municipal height caps (<150 ft) | -0.9% | Suburban localities | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| High cost of capital (Fed Funds >4.75 %) | -1.2% | National | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Cable-MVNO CBRS small-cell off-load | -0.6% | Urban cable footprints | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Diesel-genset refueling moratoria (post-2028) | -0.3% | Environmental zones | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Municipal Height Caps (<150 ft)
Many suburban councils now cap structure height at 150 ft, lengthening permitting cycles and raising design complexity [1]Mike Dano, “It’s a New Era in the US Cell Tower Industry,” lightreading.com. Operators must adopt costlier stealth poles or add rooftop small cells, often doubling site counts for equivalent coverage. Approval timelines can exceed 24 months, deferring cash flows and tempering the growth trajectory of the United States telecom towers market.
High Cost of Capital
With benchmark interest rates above 4.75%, refinancing and new-build economics tighten, particularly for regional operators that lack investment-grade paper [2]American Tower Corp., “Fourth-Quarter and Full-Year 2024 Results,” stocktitan.net. SBA Communications trimmed leverage to 6.1× EBITDA in response, highlighting sector-wide deleveraging. Elevated yields compress acquisition multiples, slowing portfolio churn that historically boosted the United States telecom towers market. Well-capitalized REITs can purchase distressed assets, yet industry-wide project pipelines remain selectively filtered for return thresholds.
Segment Analysis
By Ownership: Independent Operators Drive Monetization
Independent tower companies dominated the United States telecom towers market with a 75.48% share in 2024 and are on track for a 4.72% CAGR through 2030. Carrier divestitures free up funds for spectrum auctions, so Verizon’s USD 3.3 billion sale of 6,339 sites to Vertical Bridge capped a multi-year shift to asset-light strategies. Multiple tenants per structure lift returns, and scale synergies in maintenance, energy, and permitting create structural cost advantages.
Operator-owned sites remain strategically important where mission-critical coverage demands direct control, yet their relative growth lags. Joint-venture vehicles emerge for rural or military builds where carriers retain influence while leveraging independent expertise.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Installation: Rooftop Growth Accelerates Urban Densification
Ground-based structures accounted for 74.71% of 2024 revenue within the United States telecom towers market; rooftops, however, carry a 5.32% CAGR outlook to 2030. Dense downtown corridors often prohibit new macro towers, so property-owner agreements enable quicker rooftop deployments that fill millimeter-wave coverage gaps.
Ground sites still drive the highest average tenancy, Crown Castle reports 2.4 tenants per tower, so they remain core revenue engines [3]American Tower, “Global Wireless Infrastructure Provider,” americantower.com . Yet zoning pushback and aesthetics tilt incremental demand toward concealed facades, canister poles, and parapet-mounted small cells. These urban installations carry shorter development cycles, supporting faster revenue realization even if per-site rent is lower.
By Fuel Type: Renewable Transition Gains Momentum
Grid/diesel hybrids made up 63.40% of power solutions in 2024, but renewable systems show a 13.39% CAGR to 2030, outpacing every other segment in the United States telecom towers market. Solar modularity and falling battery costs allow operators to trim diesel use by as much as 80%, reducing opex and carbon obligations simultaneously.
State net-metering in Wyoming, Texas, and California, plus 30% federal investment tax credits, make payback periods more attractive. Hybrid solar-diesel kits such as ZTE’s PowerMaster accommodate 30-100% renewable shares while preserving generator backup capacity. Over time, cumulative opex savings outweigh capex premiums, nudging even grid-connected towers toward hybrid retrofits.
By Tower Type: Stealth Designs Address Aesthetic Concerns
Monopoles captured 60.28% of 2024 revenue in the United States telecom towers market, prized for quick permitting and moderate build costs. Yet stealth variants are forecast to grow 6.94% annually through 2030 because municipalities increasingly stipulate camouflaged profiles.
Concealed poles command premium rents that offset smaller antenna counts, while lattice and guyed towers remain staples for rural macro coverage where land and visual impact pose fewer issues. The type mix ultimately depends on community tolerance, aviation rules, and soil conditions, so all formats persist, but incremental growth tips toward low-visual-impact designs.
Geography Analysis
Population-dense coastal metros host the nation’s highest tower concentration, buoyed by intense carrier competition and challenging propagation environments. New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, and Dallas alone account for a disproportionate share of the United States telecom towers market because each incremental tenant can monetize the same steel multiple times.
Regulatory friction varies widely; California’s stringent environmental reviews extend project calendars, yet higher lease rates compensate. Texas and Florida remain friendlier, attracting fresh builds as a booming population strains existing coverage. Mountainous western states need taller or more numerous structures to overcome line-of-sight barriers, lifting capex per tenant but also creating durable entry hurdles.
Federal broadband programs such as BEAD steer investment toward underserved counties in Appalachia, the Midwest, and tribal regions. Those initiatives combine grants with carrier co-funding, improving site economics where pure commercial returns fall short. Consequently, the United States telecom towers market continues a balanced build-out that spans both Tier-1 metros and hard-to-serve rural zones.
Competitive Landscape
Three publicly traded REITs, American Tower, Crown Castle, and SBA Communications, concentrate most tower revenue, enjoying scale efficiencies in maintenance, energy procurement, and tenant negotiation. American Tower generated USD 10.1 billion in revenue in 2024 on 149,000 global sites, underscoring its pricing leverage.
Crown Castle sold USD 8.5 billion of fiber assets in March 2025 to sharpen its tower focus and deleverage. SBA trimmed leverage while automating site audits and deploying AI-based maintenance, aiming to widen margins despite higher interest expense.
Independent private operators led by Vertical Bridge now manage over 500,000 domestic sites after acquiring Verizon’s portfolio, creating a sizable challenger able to bid on national carrier RFPs. Smaller regionals specialize in high-permit locales or government contracts. The United States telecom towers industry, therefore, mixes concentrated national scale with niche regional expertise.
United States Telecom Towers Industry Leaders
-
American Tower Corporation
-
Crown Castle Inc.
-
SBA Communications Corp.
-
Vertical Bridge, REIT, LLC
-
Phoenix Tower International (PTI)
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- March 2025: Crown Castle closed its USD 8.5 billion divestiture of the fiber unit to Zayo and EQT.
- September 2024: Verizon completed a USD 3.3 billion sale of 6,339 towers to Vertical Bridge with 10-year initial lease terms.
- March 2024: Shentel sold its tower division to Vertical Bridge for USD 310 million, covering the mid-Atlantic states.
United States Telecom Towers Market Report Scope
A Telecommunication Tower refers to various types of towers such as monopoles, tripoles, lattice towers, guyed towers, self-support towers, poles, masts, or similar structures. These towers are utilized to hold one or more telecommunication antennae for radio communications. They can be situated on the ground or on a building's roof, and may also have an equipment shelter with electronic devices. These towers do not have full-time staff and only need occasional maintenance.
The study tracks the telecom tower landscape in terms of tower count, ownership type, and type of energy source in the US. In addition to the key market metrics, we will also cover the trends related to the following: telecom tower climber demographics in the US; coverage of the role of turf vendors and the specific programs commissioned by the network providers; and key regulations and controls put in place to mitigate the environmental and safety regulatory landscape. The report also covers the impact of COVID-19 on the market.
The United States telecom towers market is segmented by fuel type (renewable, non-renewable), by installation (rooftop, ground-based), and by ownership (operator-owned, JV, private-owned, MNO captive). The market sizes and forecasts are provided in terms of installed base (unit) for all the above segments.
| Operator-owned |
| Independent TowerCo |
| Joint-Venture TowerCo |
| MNO Captive |
| Rooftop |
| Ground-based |
| Renewable-powered |
| Grid/Diesel Hybrid |
| Monopole |
| Lattice |
| Guyed |
| Stealth / Concealed |
| By Ownership | Operator-owned |
| Independent TowerCo | |
| Joint-Venture TowerCo | |
| MNO Captive | |
| By Installation | Rooftop |
| Ground-based | |
| By Fuel Type | Renewable-powered |
| Grid/Diesel Hybrid | |
| By Tower Type | Monopole |
| Lattice | |
| Guyed | |
| Stealth / Concealed |
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the 2025 value of the United States telecom towers market?
The sector is valued at USD 7.33 billion in 2025.
How fast is the United States telecom towers market expected to grow?
It is projected to log a 4.19% CAGR to reach USD 8.99 billion by 2030.
Which ownership model holds the largest share?
Independent tower companies control 75.48% of assets.
Why are rooftop sites gaining popularity?
Urban zoning rules favor concealed installations, giving rooftops a 5.32% CAGR.
How are rising interest rates affecting tower builders?
Higher borrowing costs slow acquisitions and new builds, especially for smaller operators.
What role do renewables play in tower power?
Solar-hybrid systems are growing 13.39% annually as operators seek lower opex and carbon footprints.
Page last updated on: