| Study Period | 2017 - 2030 |
| Base Year For Estimation | 2024 |
| Forecast Data Period | 2025 - 2030 |
| Market Size (2025) | USD 29.93 Billion |
| Market Size (2030) | USD 38.08 Billion |
| CAGR (2025 - 2030) | 4.94 % |
| Market Concentration | Medium |
Major Players
*Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order |
United States Fertilizers Market Analysis
The United States Fertilizers Market size is estimated at 29.93 billion USD in 2025, and is expected to reach 38.08 billion USD by 2030, growing at a CAGR of 4.94% during the forecast period (2025-2030).
The U.S. fertilizer industry overview is undergoing significant transformation driven by sustainability initiatives and technological innovation. Conventional fertilizers continue to dominate the fertilizer market, accounting for a 77.6% share in 2022, primarily due to their cost-effectiveness and widespread availability. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's launch of a $250 million program in 2023 to support innovative and sustainable domestic fertilizer production demonstrates the government's commitment to reducing import dependency while promoting environmentally conscious practices. This shift towards sustainable production is reshaping manufacturing processes and encouraging the development of eco-friendly fertilizer alternatives.
The industry is witnessing a notable evolution in application methods and precision farming techniques. Soil-based fertilizer application remains the preferred method, commanding 78.9% of the market in 2022, while advanced application techniques like fertigation and foliar applications are gaining traction. The integration of digital technologies and smart farming solutions is enabling more precise nutrient management and application timing, leading to improved fertilizer efficiency and reduced environmental impact. Manufacturers are increasingly focusing on developing specialty products with enhanced nutrient uptake efficiency and controlled-release properties.
The market structure reflects the diverse needs of different agricultural sectors, with field crops dominating consumption patterns. Field crops account for 87.2% of the total fertilizer market size, while turf and ornamental applications represent 10.3%. This distribution aligns with the country's agricultural landscape, where corn and soybean cultivation collectively occupy over 51% of the total arable land. The industry is seeing increased demand for specialty fertilizers in high-value crops and precision farming applications, despite their premium pricing.
Regulatory changes and environmental considerations are driving innovation in fertilizer formulations and application technologies. Manufacturers are investing in research and development to create products that comply with stricter environmental regulations while maintaining agricultural productivity. The trend towards sustainable agriculture has spurred the development of bio-based fertilizers and enhanced efficiency fertilizers (EEFs). Industry players are also focusing on improving production processes to reduce carbon footprints and meet growing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) requirements, while maintaining competitive pricing structures to ensure market accessibility.
United States Fertilizers Market Trends
The limited farmland indicates the need to enhance agricultural productivity by employing agri-inputs
- In the United States, the population increased from 335.9 million in 2020 to 338.2 million in 2022. From 2000, the total farmland area decreased by almost 50 million acres, reaching a total of 893.4 million acres as of 2022. The limited farmland indicates the need to increase agricultural productivity with the use of agri inputs. Fertilizers have been used for a long time to increase the productivity of crops. The four major crops in the United States are corn, cotton, soybean, and wheat, which account for more than 65.7% of the principal crop acreage in 2022.
- Soybean and corn are the two largest crops grown in the United States. In 2022, soybeans had the highest area under cultivation, accounting for 25.8% of the total arable land in the United States, followed by corn at 25.7% and wheat at 11.1%. The majority of these crops are grown in a region known as the "Corn Belt," which covers western Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Missouri, eastern Nebraska, and eastern Kansas. The production of corn (maize) and soybeans dominates this area. Additionally, the United States is a major exporter of rice, with most of the cultivation happening in four regions, three of which are in the South and one in California, according to the USDA.
- Manufacturers of farm inputs are developing innovative products to assist farmers with the precise application of fertilizers. This helps farmers reduce the cost of cultivation while increasing efficiency. The country's field crops have immense market potential, and with increased government funding and support, they are expected to drive positive growth in crop cultivation in this area.
Understand The Key Trends Shaping This Market
Download PDF
Nitrogen deficiency is one of the most prevalent crop nutrient problems across cropping areas in the United States
- The average application rate of primary nutrients (nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorus) in the country's field crops industry stands at approximately 166.61 kg/hectare. Nitrogen constitutes 45.93%, potassium accounts for 28.11%, and phosphorus makes up 25.96% of the total primary nutrient application in field crops.
- In field crops, rapeseed/ canola was applied with an average primary nutrient application rate of 284.92 kg/hectare, which is the highest in field crops. In primary nutrients, nitrogen occupies first place with an average application rate of 229.60 kg/hectare. This is because nitrogen is required in large amounts for plant metabolism, and it is a major component of chlorophyll and amino acids.
- In the United States, corn/maize stands as the second-largest field crop, with an average primary nutrient application rate of 245.40 kg/hectare, followed by rapeseed/canola. Corn production constitutes approximately 31.44% of the country's total field crop output. Specifically, corn requires about 50.06% of nitrogen, 23.77% of phosphorus, and 26.17% of potash, making up the lion's share of the total nutrient application.
- Primary nutrients play a pivotal role in enhancing plant enzyme function, bolstering plant cell growth, and facilitating crucial biochemical processes. Any deficiency in these primary nutrients can significantly impact plant health, stunting growth and hampering crop yields. In response, the application of primary nutrients in field crops is expected to rise, driven by the need to meet escalating productivity demands.
OTHER KEY INDUSTRY TRENDS COVERED IN THE REPORT
- Unfavorable climate conditions, such as extreme heat and dry weather, reduced the production of several key crops
- Copper and boron applications have resulted in higher crop yield
- Secondary micronutrient deficiencies are predominant in intensive corn production systems across the United States
- Expanding irrigation areas under major crops like corn and soybeans may drive irrigation agriculture in the country
- Micronutrients are pivotal in equipping crops to combat both biotic and abiotic stresses
- In 2022, nitrogen accounted was the most consumed by vegetable crops, followed by potassium and phosphorus
- Magnesium and sulfur are the major secondary macronutrients consumed by vegetable crops
Segment Analysis: Type
Straight Fertilizers Segment in US Fertilizers Market
Straight fertilizers continue to dominate the US fertilizers market, accounting for approximately 78% market share in 2024. This significant market position is attributed to their widespread adoption among farmers due to their cost-effectiveness, consistent supply chain, and established application methods. The segment's strength is particularly evident in field crops, where nitrogen-based straight fertilizers like urea and anhydrous ammonia are extensively used. The preference for the straight fertilizer market is also driven by their flexibility in application timing and the ability to precisely address specific nutrient deficiencies in crops. Additionally, the segment benefits from the extensive distribution network and the farmers' familiarity with traditional application methods, making them the preferred choice for large-scale agricultural operations across the United States.
Complex Fertilizers Segment in US Fertilizers Market
The complex fertilizers market segment, while holding a smaller market share, is demonstrating robust growth potential with an expected growth rate of approximately 5% during 2024-2029. This growth is primarily driven by the increasing adoption of advanced farming practices and the rising demand for balanced crop nutrition. The complex fertilizers market is gaining traction due to their ability to provide multiple nutrients in a single application, reducing labor costs and improving nutrient use efficiency. The segment's growth is further supported by technological advancements in fertilizer manufacturing, leading to enhanced product formulations that cater to specific crop requirements. Additionally, the increasing focus on sustainable agriculture and environmental regulations is pushing farmers towards complex fertilizers that offer better nutrient management capabilities and reduced environmental impact.
Segment Analysis: Form
Conventional Fertilizers Segment in US Fertilizers Market
Conventional fertilizers dominate the United States fertilizer market, commanding approximately 78% market share in 2024. This significant market position is attributed to their wide availability, consistent supply chain networks, and cost-effectiveness compared to specialty variants. The segment's strength lies in its established distribution infrastructure and farmers' familiarity with application methods. Straight fertilizers, particularly nitrogen-based products, constitute the largest portion within conventional fertilizers, driven by their essential role in crop development and yield enhancement. The segment's dominance is particularly evident in field crops, where large-scale farming operations prefer conventional fertilizers for their proven efficacy and economic viability. The lower price point of conventional fertilizers, combined with their reliable performance in major agricultural regions, continues to make them the preferred choice for most American farmers.
Specialty Fertilizers Segment in US Fertilizers Market
The specialty fertilizers segment is experiencing robust growth, projected to expand at approximately 5% CAGR from 2024 to 2029. This accelerated growth is driven by the increasing adoption of precision agriculture techniques and growing environmental consciousness among farmers. The segment's expansion is particularly notable in controlled-release fertilizers and water-soluble products, which offer enhanced nutrient efficiency and reduced environmental impact. Technological advancements in coating materials and delivery systems are further propelling the segment's growth, enabling better nutrient absorption and reduced losses through leaching. The rising adoption of micro-irrigation systems in the United States is also contributing to increased demand for specialty fertilizers, particularly in high-value crops and controlled environment agriculture. Additionally, government initiatives promoting sustainable farming practices and the need to optimize fertilizer use efficiency are creating favorable conditions for specialty fertilizer adoption.
Segment Analysis: Application Mode
Soil Application Segment in US Fertilizer Market
Soil application continues to dominate the US fertilizer market, commanding approximately 78% market share in 2024. This method's prominence can be attributed to its cost-effectiveness and ability to improve overall soil nutrient content, unlike other application methods. Soil application of fertilizer is commonly executed through broadcasting, which involves spreading granular or pelletized fertilizers evenly over the soil surface. This straightforward approach requires minimal specialized equipment, making it a practical and economical choice for many farmers. The method is particularly preferred for applying primary macronutrients, as it allows for better soil nutrient enhancement compared to alternative application techniques. Additionally, the widespread adoption of conventional fertilizers, which are primarily applied through the soil fertilizer market, further reinforces this segment's market dominance.
Fertigation Segment in US Fertilizer Market
The fertigation fertilizer market segment is experiencing robust growth in the US fertilizer market, driven by its numerous advantages in modern agriculture. This method combines irrigation with fertilizer application, offering precise nutrient delivery while optimizing water usage. Fertigation provides multiple benefits to farmers, including uniform distribution of nutrients, significant reduction in water and fertilizer consumption, and decreased labor costs. The method is particularly valuable for large-scale farming operations where efficiency and resource optimization are crucial. The increasing adoption of micro-irrigation systems, with about 68.5% of irrigated land under sprinkler and micro-irrigation systems, is further propelling the growth of fertigation. This trend is particularly evident in regions with advanced irrigation infrastructure and in crops requiring precise nutrient management.
Remaining Segments in Application Mode
The foliar application segment represents another significant method in the US fertilizer market, offering unique advantages in specific agricultural scenarios. This method involves direct application of nutrients to plant leaves, making it particularly effective for addressing immediate nutrient deficiencies and providing supplemental feeding during critical growth stages. Foliar application is especially valuable when soil conditions limit nutrient uptake through roots or when rapid correction of nutrient deficiencies is required. The method has gained particular importance in high-value crops and situations where precise nutrient management is crucial for crop quality and yield optimization. The effectiveness of foliar application in delivering micronutrients and its role in integrated nutrient management strategies continues to drive its adoption among US farmers.
Segment Analysis: Crop Type
United States Fertilizers Industry Overview
Top Companies in United States Fertilizers Market
The US fertilizer market is characterized by intense competition among major players who are actively pursuing innovation and expansion strategies. Large fertilizer companies are investing heavily in developing sustainable and environmentally friendly fertilizer solutions, including controlled-release formulations and micronutrient-enriched products. Operational agility is demonstrated through investments in production capacity expansion, supply chain optimization, and digital technology adoption for improved distribution efficiency. Strategic partnerships and collaborations with agricultural technology firms are becoming increasingly common to enhance product offerings and market reach. US fertilizer companies are also focusing on geographical expansion through new facility construction and acquisition of regional distributors, while simultaneously strengthening their research and development capabilities to meet evolving farmer needs and regulatory requirements.
Consolidated Market Led By Established Players
The US fertilizer market exhibits a highly consolidated structure dominated by large-scale multinational corporations with integrated operations across the value chain. These established players leverage their extensive distribution networks, technological capabilities, and economies of scale to maintain market leadership. The market is characterized by a mix of global conglomerates and specialized fertilizer manufacturers, with the former holding significant market share due to their diverse product portfolios and strong financial resources. Local players maintain their presence through specialized product offerings and strong regional relationships.
Merger and acquisition activity in the sector remains robust, driven by companies seeking to expand their geographic footprint, acquire new technologies, and strengthen their market position. Vertical integration strategies are prevalent, with companies acquiring raw material suppliers and distribution networks to ensure supply chain control and cost efficiency. Strategic partnerships between manufacturers and agricultural service providers are becoming increasingly common, creating integrated solutions for farmers while building barriers to entry for new competitors.
Innovation and Sustainability Drive Future Growth
Success in the US fertilizer market increasingly depends on companies' ability to develop innovative, sustainable products while maintaining cost competitiveness. Incumbent players are focusing on expanding their specialty fertilizer portfolios, investing in precision agriculture technologies, and developing environmentally friendly solutions to maintain their market positions. Building strong relationships with agricultural retailers and providing comprehensive crop nutrition solutions, rather than just products, has become crucial for market success. Companies are also investing in digital platforms to enhance customer engagement and provide value-added services.
For contenders looking to gain market share, specialization in niche segments and focus on sustainable solutions present viable opportunities. Success factors include developing strong distribution partnerships, investing in research and development for innovative products, and building regional presence before expanding nationally. The market's future will be shaped by increasing environmental regulations, growing demand for organic farming solutions, and the need for more efficient nutrient delivery systems. Companies that can adapt to these changing dynamics while maintaining operational efficiency and product quality will be better positioned for long-term success. Fertilizer companies in the US that focus on these areas will likely see significant growth.
United States Fertilizers Market Leaders
-
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
-
Nutrien Ltd.
-
The Andersons Inc.
-
The Mosaic Company
-
Yara International ASA
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Need More Details on Market Players and Competiters?
Download PDF
United States Fertilizers Market News
- January 2023: ICL has entered into a strategic partnership agreement with General Mills, in which it will be the supplier of strategic specialty phosphate solutions to General Mills. The long-term agreement will also focus on international expansion.
- October 2022: The Andersons entered into an agreement to acquire the assets of Mote Farm Service, Inc. to expand thier retail farm center network.
- August 2022: Koch invested around USD 30 million in the Kansas nitrogen plant to increase UAN production by 35,000 tons per year to meet growing UAN demand across western Kansas and eastern Colorado.
Free With This Report
Along with the report, We also offer a comprehensive and exhaustive data pack with 25+ graphs on area under cultivation and average application rate per hectare. The data pack includes Globe, North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America, and Africa.
United States Fertilizers Market Report - Table of Contents
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & KEY FINDINGS
2. REPORT OFFERS
3. INTRODUCTION
- 3.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
- 3.2 Scope of the Study
- 3.3 Research Methodology
4. KEY INDUSTRY TRENDS
-
4.1 Acreage Of Major Crop Types
- 4.1.1 Field Crops
- 4.1.2 Horticultural Crops
-
4.2 Average Nutrient Application Rates
- 4.2.1 Micronutrients
- 4.2.1.1 Field Crops
- 4.2.1.2 Horticultural Crops
- 4.2.2 Primary Nutrients
- 4.2.2.1 Field Crops
- 4.2.2.2 Horticultural Crops
- 4.2.3 Secondary Macronutrients
- 4.2.3.1 Field Crops
- 4.2.3.2 Horticultural Crops
- 4.3 Agricultural Land Equipped For Irrigation
- 4.4 Regulatory Framework
- 4.5 Value Chain & Distribution Channel Analysis
5. MARKET SEGMENTATION (includes market size in Value in USD and Volume, Forecasts up to 2030 and analysis of growth prospects)
-
5.1 Type
- 5.1.1 Complex
- 5.1.2 Straight
- 5.1.2.1 Micronutrients
- 5.1.2.1.1 Boron
- 5.1.2.1.2 Copper
- 5.1.2.1.3 Iron
- 5.1.2.1.4 Manganese
- 5.1.2.1.5 Molybdenum
- 5.1.2.1.6 Zinc
- 5.1.2.1.7 Others
- 5.1.2.2 Nitrogenous
- 5.1.2.2.1 Ammonium Nitrate
- 5.1.2.2.2 Anhydrous Ammonia
- 5.1.2.2.3 Urea
- 5.1.2.2.4 Others
- 5.1.2.3 Phosphatic
- 5.1.2.3.1 DAP
- 5.1.2.3.2 MAP
- 5.1.2.3.3 SSP
- 5.1.2.3.4 TSP
- 5.1.2.4 Potassic
- 5.1.2.4.1 MoP
- 5.1.2.4.2 SoP
- 5.1.2.4.3 Others
- 5.1.2.5 Secondary Macronutrients
- 5.1.2.5.1 Calcium
- 5.1.2.5.2 Magnesium
- 5.1.2.5.3 Sulfur
-
5.2 Form
- 5.2.1 Conventional
- 5.2.2 Speciality
- 5.2.2.1 CRF
- 5.2.2.2 Liquid Fertilizer
- 5.2.2.3 SRF
- 5.2.2.4 Water Soluble
-
5.3 Application Mode
- 5.3.1 Fertigation
- 5.3.2 Foliar
- 5.3.3 Soil
-
5.4 Crop Type
- 5.4.1 Field Crops
- 5.4.2 Horticultural Crops
- 5.4.3 Turf & Ornamental
6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE
- 6.1 Key Strategic Moves
- 6.2 Market Share Analysis
- 6.3 Company Landscape
-
6.4 Company Profiles
- 6.4.1 CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
- 6.4.2 Haifa Group
- 6.4.3 ICL Group Ltd
- 6.4.4 Koch Industries Inc.
- 6.4.5 Nutrien Ltd.
- 6.4.6 Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
- 6.4.7 The Andersons Inc.
- 6.4.8 The Mosaic Company
- 6.4.9 Wilbur-Ellis Company LLC
- 6.4.10 Yara International ASA
- *List Not Exhaustive
7. KEY STRATEGIC QUESTIONS FOR FERTILIZER CEOS
8. APPENDIX
-
8.1 Global Overview
- 8.1.1 Overview
- 8.1.2 Porter’s Five Forces Framework
- 8.1.3 Global Value Chain Analysis
- 8.1.4 Market Dynamics (DROs)
- 8.2 Sources & References
- 8.3 List of Tables & Figures
- 8.4 Primary Insights
- 8.5 Data Pack
- 8.6 Glossary of Terms
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now
List of Tables & Figures
- Figure 1:
- CULTIVATION OF FIELD CROPS IN HECTARE, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2022
- Figure 2:
- CULTIVATION OF HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN HECTARE, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2022
- Figure 3:
- CONSUMPTION OF MICRONUTRIENTS BY FIELD CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, UNITED STATES, 2022
- Figure 4:
- CONSUMPTION OF MICRONUTRIENTS BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, UNITED STATES, 2022
- Figure 5:
- CONSUMPTION OF PRIMARY NUTRIENTS BY FIELD CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, UNITED STATES, 2022
- Figure 6:
- CONSUMPTION OF PRIMARY NUTRIENTS BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, UNITED STATES, 2022
- Figure 7:
- CONSUMPTION OF SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS BY FIELD CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, UNITED STATES, 2022
- Figure 8:
- CONSUMPTION OF SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN KG/HECTARE, UNITED STATES, 2022
- Figure 9:
- AGRICULTURAL LAND EQUIPPED FOR IRRIGATION IN HECTARE, UNITED STATES, 2022
- Figure 10:
- FERTILIZER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 11:
- FERTILIZER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 12:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY TYPE IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 13:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY TYPE IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 14:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 15:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 16:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 17:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 18:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 19:
- STRAIGHT FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY NUTRIENT IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 20:
- STRAIGHT FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY NUTRIENT IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 21:
- STRAIGHT FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY NUTRIENT IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 22:
- STRAIGHT FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY NUTRIENT IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 23:
- MICRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 24:
- MICRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 25:
- MICRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY PRODUCT IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 26:
- MICRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY PRODUCT IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 27:
- BORON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 28:
- BORON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 29:
- BORON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 30:
- COPPER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 31:
- COPPER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 32:
- COPPER FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 33:
- IRON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 34:
- IRON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 35:
- IRON FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 36:
- MANGANESE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 37:
- MANGANESE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 38:
- MANGANESE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 39:
- MOLYBDENUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 40:
- MOLYBDENUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 41:
- MOLYBDENUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 42:
- ZINC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 43:
- ZINC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 44:
- ZINC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 45:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 46:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 47:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 48:
- NITROGENOUS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 49:
- NITROGENOUS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 50:
- NITROGENOUS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY PRODUCT IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 51:
- NITROGENOUS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY PRODUCT IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 52:
- AMMONIUM NITRATE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 53:
- AMMONIUM NITRATE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 54:
- AMMONIUM NITRATE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 55:
- ANHYDROUS AMMONIA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 56:
- ANHYDROUS AMMONIA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 57:
- ANHYDROUS AMMONIA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 58:
- UREA UREA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 59:
- UREA UREA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 60:
- UREA FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 61:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 62:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 63:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 64:
- PHOSPHATIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 65:
- PHOSPHATIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 66:
- PHOSPHATIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY PRODUCT IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 67:
- PHOSPHATIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY PRODUCT IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 68:
- DAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 69:
- DAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 70:
- DAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 71:
- MAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 72:
- MAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 73:
- MAP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 74:
- SSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 75:
- SSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 76:
- SSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 77:
- TSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 78:
- TSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 79:
- TSP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 80:
- POTASSIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 81:
- POTASSIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 82:
- POTASSIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY PRODUCT IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 83:
- POTASSIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY PRODUCT IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 84:
- MOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 85:
- MOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 86:
- MOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 87:
- SOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 88:
- SOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 89:
- SOP FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 90:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 91:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 92:
- OTHERS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 93:
- SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 94:
- SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY PRODUCT IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 95:
- SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY PRODUCT IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 96:
- SECONDARY MACRONUTRIENTS FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY PRODUCT IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 97:
- CALCIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 98:
- CALCIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 99:
- CALCIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 100:
- MAGNESIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 101:
- MAGNESIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 102:
- MAGNESIUM FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 103:
- SULFUR FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 104:
- SULFUR FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 105:
- SULFUR FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 106:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY FORM IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 107:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY FORM IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 108:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY FORM IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 109:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 110:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 111:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 112:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 113:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY SPECIALITY TYPE IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 114:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY SPECIALITY TYPE IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 115:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY SPECIALITY TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 116:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY SPECIALITY TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 117:
- CRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 118:
- CRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 119:
- CRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 120:
- LIQUID FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 121:
- LIQUID FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 122:
- LIQUID FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 123:
- SRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 124:
- SRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 125:
- SRF FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 126:
- WATER SOLUBLE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 127:
- WATER SOLUBLE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 128:
- WATER SOLUBLE FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 129:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY APPLICATION MODE IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 130:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY APPLICATION MODE IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 131:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY APPLICATION MODE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 132:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY APPLICATION MODE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 133:
- FERTIGATION APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 134:
- FERTIGATION APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 135:
- FERTIGATION APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 136:
- FOLIAR APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 137:
- FOLIAR APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 138:
- FOLIAR APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 139:
- SOIL APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 140:
- SOIL APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 141:
- SOIL APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER IN VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 142:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY CROP TYPE IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 143:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY CROP TYPE IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 144:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 145:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 146:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY FIELD CROPS IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 147:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY FIELD CROPS IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 148:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 149:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 150:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 151:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 152:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY TURF & ORNAMENTAL IN METRIC TON, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 153:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY TURF & ORNAMENTAL IN USD, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 154:
- FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY TYPE IN %, UNITED STATES, 2023 VS 2030
- Figure 155:
- MOST ACTIVE COMPANIES BY NUMBER OF STRATEGIC MOVES, UNITED STATES, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 156:
- UNITED STATES FERTILIZERS MARKET, MOST ADOPTED STRATEGIES, 2018 - 2021
- Figure 157:
- MARKET SHARE OF MAJOR PLAYERS IN %, UNITED STATES
United States Fertilizers Industry Segmentation
Complex, Straight are covered as segments by Type. Conventional, Speciality are covered as segments by Form. Fertigation, Foliar, Soil are covered as segments by Application Mode. Field Crops, Horticultural Crops, Turf & Ornamental are covered as segments by Crop Type.| Type | Complex | |||
| Straight | Micronutrients | Boron | ||
| Copper | ||||
| Iron | ||||
| Manganese | ||||
| Molybdenum | ||||
| Zinc | ||||
| Others | ||||
| Nitrogenous | Ammonium Nitrate | |||
| Anhydrous Ammonia | ||||
| Urea | ||||
| Others | ||||
| Phosphatic | DAP | |||
| MAP | ||||
| SSP | ||||
| TSP | ||||
| Potassic | MoP | |||
| SoP | ||||
| Others | ||||
| Secondary Macronutrients | Calcium | |||
| Magnesium | ||||
| Sulfur | ||||
| Form | Conventional | |||
| Speciality | CRF | |||
| Liquid Fertilizer | ||||
| SRF | ||||
| Water Soluble | ||||
| Application Mode | Fertigation | |||
| Foliar | ||||
| Soil | ||||
| Crop Type | Field Crops | |||
| Horticultural Crops | ||||
| Turf & Ornamental | ||||
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now
Market Definition
- MARKET ESTIMATION LEVEL - Market Estimations for various types of fertilizers has been done at the product-level and not at the nutrient-level.
- NUTRIENT TYPES COVERED - Primary Nutrients: N, P and K, Secondary Macronutrients: Ca, Mg and S, Micronutients: Zn, Mn, Cu, Fe, Mo, B, and Others
- AVERAGE NUTRIENT APPLICATION RATE - This refers to the average volume of nutrient consumed per hectare of farmland in each country.
- CROP TYPES COVERED - Field Crops: Cereals, Pulses, Oilseeds, and Fiber Crops Horticulture: Fruits, Vegetables, Plantation Crops and Spices, Turf Grass and Ornamentals
| Keyword | Definition |
|---|---|
| Fertilizer | Chemical substance applied to crops to ensure nutritional requirements, available in various forms such as granules, powders, liquid, water soluble, etc. |
| Specialty Fertilizer | Used for enhanced efficiency and nutrient availability applied through soil, foliar, and fertigation. Includes CRF, SRF, liquid fertilizer, and water soluble fertilizers. |
| Controlled-Release Fertilizers (CRF) | Coated with materials such as polymer, polymer-sulfur, and other materials such as resins to ensure nutrient availability to the crop for its entire life cycle. |
| Slow-Release Fertilizers (SRF) | Coated with materials such as sulfur, neem, etc., to ensure nutrient availability to the crop for a longer period. |
| Foliar Fertilizers | Consist of both liquid and water soluble fertilizers applied through foliar application. |
| Water-Soluble Fertilizers | Available in various forms including liquid, powder, etc., used in foliar and fertigation mode of fertilizer application. |
| Fertigation | Fertilizers applied through different irrigation systems such as drip irrigation, micro irrigation, sprinkler irrigation, etc. |
| Anhydrous Ammonia | Used as fertilizer, directly injected into the soil, available in gaseous liquid form. |
| Single Super Phosphate (SSP) | Phosphorus fertilizer containing only phosphorus which has lesser than or equal to 35%. |
| Triple Super Phosphate (TSP) | Phosphorus fertilizer containing only phosphorus greater than 35%. |
| Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizers | Fertilizers coated or treated with additional layers of various ingredients to make it more efficient compared to other fertilizers. |
| Conventional Fertilizer | Fertilizers applied to crops through traditional methods including broadcasting, row placement, ploughing soil placement, etc. |
| Chelated Micronutrients | Micronutrient fertilizers coated with chelating agents such as EDTA, EDDHA, DTPA, HEDTA, etc. |
| Liquid Fertilizers | Available in liquid form, majorly used for application of fertilizers to crops through foliar and fertigation. |
Need More Details on Market Definition?
Ask a Question
Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence follows a four-step methodology in all our reports.
- Step-1: IDENTIFY KEY VARIABLES: In order to build a robust forecasting methodology, the variables and factors identified in Step-1 are tested against available historical market numbers. Through an iterative process, the variables required for market forecast are set and the model is built on the basis of these variables.
- Step-2: Build a Market Model: Market-size estimations for the forecast years are in nominal terms. Inflation is not a part of the pricing, and the average selling price (ASP) is kept constant throughout the forecast period for each country.
- Step-3: Validate and Finalize: In this important step, all market numbers, variables and analyst calls are validated through an extensive network of primary research experts from the market studied. The respondents are selected across levels and functions to generate a holistic picture of the market studied.
- Step-4: Research Outputs: Syndicated Reports, Custom Consulting Assignments, Databases & Subscription Platforms
Get More Details On Research Methodology
Download PDF
