
United States Activated Carbon Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The United States Activated Carbon Market is expected to grow from 216.24 kilotons in 2025 to 224.07 kilotons in 2026 and is forecast to reach 267.66 kilotons by 2031 at 3.62% CAGR over 2026-2031. This steady climb links directly to federal water rules that now treat granular activated carbon as the benchmark for PFAS compliance, municipal budgets earmarked for long-life adsorption beds, and growing replacements across coal plant mercury-control and petrochemical VOC streams. Infrastructure grants under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and separate 3M and DuPont–Chemours–Corteva settlements are underwriting large-scale treatment projects, while automotive evaporative-emission standards and domestic API manufacturing add second-layer momentum. Against these structural tailwinds, high-energy virgin activation, feedstock inflation, and emerging substitutes such as ion-exchange resins and nanofiltration membranes act as counterweights yet have not stalled capacity expansions or long-term supply contracts.
Key Report Takeaways
- By product type, granular activated carbon led with 45.78% revenue share in 2025; extruded or pelletized is forecast to expand at a 4.18% CAGR to 2031.
- By raw material, water purification accounted for 58.10% share of the United States activated carbon market size in 2025; medicine applications are projected to grow at a 4.29% CAGR through 2031.
- By end-user industry, water treatment accounted for 47.30% of the United States' activated carbon market share in 2025, advancing at a 4.11% CAGR through 2031.
Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.
United States Activated Carbon Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| EPA regulations on PFAS in drinking water | +1.8% | National, early momentum in Northeast, Southeast | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Phase-out of mercury emissions from coal | +0.6% | Southeast, Midwest coal states | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Tightening VOC limits for industrial air | +0.5% | Gulf Coast, California | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Expansion of pharmaceutical API capacity | +0.4% | Georgia, North Carolina, Iowa | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Grid-scale supercapacitor research | +0.2% | National, pilot deployments | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
EPA Regulations on PFAS in Drinking Water
The April 2024 National Primary Drinking Water Regulation established a 4 ppt limit for PFOA and PFOS, prompting the rapid procurement of granular activated carbon as Best Available Technology[1]National Primary Drinking Water Regulation Fact Sheet, EPA, epa.gov. Monitoring starts in April 2027, and full compliance is due by April 2029, forcing 77% of systems still lacking PFAS treatment to install beds within three years. A typical municipal plant now loads between 9,000 kg and 45,000 kg of carbon with 9- to 12-month breakthrough cycles, creating repeat demand and lifting carbon reactivation volumes. Calgon Carbon’s nine-year supply pact with American Water covering more than 50 sites showcases the rush to lock in inventory, thermal reactivation slots, and logistics. Short-chain PFAS and high organic matter lessen GAC’s run length, prompting hybrid pairs with powdered carbon, ion exchange, or membranes, yet this shift enlarges rather than shrinks total treatment spending.
Phase-Out of Mercury Emissions from Coal-Fired Utilities
The 2024 Mercury and Air Toxics review tightened lignite plant mercury limits from 4.0 lb to 1.2 lb per TBtu, prompting the use of brominated powdered carbon injections at 2–5 lb per million acf across 55 coal units. Arq’s refined coal production underscores the tonnage scale already in place, while retrofit projects in Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, North Carolina, Texas, and West Virginia keep short-term volume buoyant. The driver contributes 0.6 percentage points to CAGR yet fades as coal retirements and carbon-capture retrofits displace aging units after 2028. The EPA’s March 2025 reconsideration introduces policy risk that could lead to a reversal of long-run PAC orders.
Tightening VOC Limits for Industrial Air Streams
New SOCMI and HON rules require fenceline monitoring for ethylene oxide, chloroprene, and benzene, positioning dual-bed carbon adsorbers as a key component of compliance equipment. Gulf Coast petrochemical hubs face the most immediate upgrades, where Calgon Carbon’s 2024 Gulf Coast reactivation acquisition shortens turnaround times and lowers freight costs. Many plants already operate adsorption beds, so the rule primarily drives bed replacements and the installation of breakthrough monitoring sensors. Competitive pressure from membranes and biochar composites caps the CAGR lift at 0.5 percentage points, yet these alternatives seldom match carbon’s operational familiarity in high-throughput streams.
Rapid Expansion of Pharmaceutical API Capacity
Reshoring initiatives led by ACG, Cambrex, and Sharp have added hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of stainless-steel reactors, solvent recovery loops, and continuous platforms in Georgia, Iowa, and North Carolina[2]“Continuous API Manufacturing Trends,” Pharmaceutical Technology, pharma-technology.com. Food-grade activated carbon filters color bodies and residual solvents to sub-ppm levels, meeting Food Chemicals Codex specs of ≤10 mg/kg lead and ≤3 mg/kg arsenic. Continuous manufacturing lowers per-batch carbon demand but raises quality thresholds, which boosts value over volume. Implementation timelines running past 2028 shift most tonnage gains to the long term, contributing 0.4 percentage points to CAGR.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| High energy cost of virgin steam activation | –0.7% | National, all production hubs | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Competition from silica gel, biochar, membranes | –0.5% | Higher adoption in California, Northeast | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Climate-driven feedstock risk for coconut shells | –0.3% | Import-dependent supply chain | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
High Energy Cost of Virgin Steam Activation
Virgin activation runs at 800–1,000°C and emits up to 9.5 kg CO2-eq per kg of coal-based carbon, triple that of thermal reactivation. Natural gas and electricity account for as much as 30% of a factory's cost, encouraging utilities to recycle spent beds through 17 U.S. reactivation furnaces, where 66% of non-hazardous carbon now finds a second life. Calgon Carbon’s five domestic reactivation kilns and JACOBI’s 2025 price pass-throughs illustrate the ripple effects of energy inflation. Microwave and vacuum activation trials promise 50–70% savings but remain capital-intensive pilots, keeping this drag at –0.7 percentage points through 2028.
Competition from Silica Gel, Biochar and Advanced Membranes
Nanofiltration and reverse osmosis strip both long- and short-chain PFAS with greater than 90% efficiency, addressing GAC’s short-chain weakness. The Klein plant in Colorado switched from GAC to ion exchange in 2024, reducing solid waste by a factor of 500. Veolia now pairs GAC with nanofiltration in 30 projects, signaling utilities’ technology-agnostic approach. Zeolite and biochar composites draw interest for sustainability and cost, yet GAC retains incumbency in taste, odor, and total organic carbon removal, limiting the restraint to –0.5 percentage points.
Segment Analysis
By Product Type: Granular Dominance Meets Extruded Momentum
Granular activated carbon accounted for 45.78% of 2025 shipments, a figure that underscores its entrenched use in municipal beds designed to meet the EPA’s 4 ppt PFAS ceiling. A single 30 MGD facility, such as Veolia’s Stanton plant, loads 1.68 million pounds across 42 vessels, showcasing the tonnage discipline utilities lock into when entering long-dated service contracts. Granular grades ranging from 0.6 mm to 2.4 mm balance pressure drop with efficient regeneration, and five domestic kilns keep trucking lanes short for reactivation loops. Although the United States activated carbon market faces hybrid contenders, most utilities retain granular beds for multi-contaminant removal beyond PFAS, from geosmin taste episodes to agricultural runoff organics.
Extruded or pelletized forms capture the fastest 4.18% CAGR as the California Air Resources Board boosts evaporative canister standards that require uniform macropores for lifetime hydrocarbon retention. Ingevity credits 70% of its specialty carbon sales to the auto sector, yet saw a 5% dip in 2024 revenue tied to OEM destocking and Asian imports. Pellet demand also grows in commercial air purification, where cylindrical 4 mm pellets reduce the energy required by blowers. Carbonxt placed its Kentucky extrusion line onstream in Q1 2025 at 10,000 tpa, cutting lead times to Midwest and Southeast clients. Powdered activated carbon maintains seasonal swings for taste and odor spikes and brominated PAC injections for coal mercury, giving the United States activated carbon market a balanced product mosaic without undermining granular’s core share.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Raw Material: Water Purification Supremacy, Medicine Surging
Water purification accounted for 58.10% of the 2025 offtake, cementing its stake as the primary tonnage sink. The United States' activated carbon market size allocated to municipal water continues to grow as 7,500 utilities confront the EPA’s PFAS rule and channel parts of the USD 10 billion infrastructure grant, plus settlement proceeds, into bed retrofits. Each bed cycle creates a two-tier revenue stream: fresh carbon plus reactivation fees, a loop that Kuraray and Veolia monetize through vertically integrated kilns and service fleets. Gas purification, including coal PAC and petrochemical VOC adsorbers, remains the second-largest draw and benefits from new fenceline compliance but faces eventual tapering as coal closures accelerate after 2030.
Medicine applications, while smaller, grow at a 4.29% clip, the fastest in this dimension, as continuous API reactors come online in Georgia, Iowa, and North Carolina. High-purity carbon filters residual solvents and color bodies to meet stringent FCC metal limits, fetching premium margins that offset lower mass throughput. Metal extraction and food and beverage uses maintain steady baseline volumes; USDA organic rules and alcohol filtration guidelines ensure that vegetative-source carbon retains its incumbency. The demand mix keeps the United States activated carbon market balanced across liquid and vapor channels, even as sectors cycle at different cadences.
By End-User Industry: Water Treatment’s Dual Leadership
Water treatment not only owns 47.30% of 2025 end-user demand but also delivers the swiftest 4.11% CAGR, an uncommon pairing that underscores how regulatory certainty fuels both scale and growth. Settlement payouts of USD 10.3 billion from 3M and USD 1.186 billion from DuPont–Chemours–Corteva accelerate bed rollouts across utilities from Maine to Florida, forward-funding procurement well into the 2030s. Veolia counts 170 active BeyondPFAS projects, while Evoqua’s mobile AquaCat fleets bridge supply gaps during construction, thereby widening service layers within the United States' activated carbon market.
Food and beverage plants rely on carbon for color and off-taste polishing at doses regulated by the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, sustaining a steady annual pull. Healthcare centers use carbon in hemoperfusion and gas-filter housings, adding niche but high-value orders. Automotive canister demand fluctuates with vehicle builds, yet rising stringency rules, such as LEV IV, offset OEM inventory cycles. Industrial processors in chemicals and metals continue to apply granular and powdered carbon to meet hazardous air pollutant caps under the updated HON and SOCMI rules. This diversified customer tapestry shields the United States activated carbon market from single-sector shock.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Geography Analysis
The Northeast anchors the highest per-capita usage in 2025 as legacy military sites and dense industrial corridors amplify PFAS exceedances in states from Maine to Pennsylvania. The Stanton plant in Delaware, along with American Water’s multi-state supply contract, confirms long-haul commitments that extend to 2033 and beyond. Dense food processing in New York and Pennsylvania adds secondary demand for color and odor polishing. As utilities implement breakthrough monitoring, carbon change-outs could occur more frequently than in the prior 12-month cycle, nudging regional tonnage higher even if alternative media share some of the flows.
The Southeast and Gulf Coast exhibit above-average CAGR, driven by coal PAC injections in Florida, Kentucky, and North Carolina, as well as petrochemical VOC controls in Texas and Louisiana. Calgon Carbon’s reactivation expansion and Carbonxt’s Georgia and Kentucky plants shorten logistic chains, a critical factor in tight truck markets. Military remediation at bases in North Carolina, Georgia, and South Carolina primes more granular bed orders, and rising residential growth boosts municipal throughput. Hurricane season risk encourages utilities to stockpile carbon safety in nearby depots, subtly increasing inventory carry in the United States' activated carbon market.
Midwest demand splits between automotive canisters in Michigan and Ohio, corn-wet milling and ethanol in Illinois and Iowa, and coal power mercury controls in Missouri. JACOBI’s bonded-carrier network supplies powdered grades tailored for taste and total organic carbon removal, while Carbonxt’s Minnesota pellet line backstops regional water contracts. The West, dominated by California’s strict VOC and potable water standards, buys high-performance carbons for semiconductor fabs and wildfire smoke mitigation. Limited coal capacity curbs mercury-control PAC volumes, yet rising desalination and potable reuse drives granular bed installations that help stabilize Western draw on the United States activated carbon market.
Competitive Landscape
The United States Activated Carbon Market is concentrated. Calgon Carbon reigns in municipal water through five domestic reactivation plants, which exceed 90 million kg of virgin output, and its nine-year American Water contract secures a recurring supply through 2033. JACOBI combines offshore coconut-shell capacity with US distribution, absorbing energy and freight shocks through a February 2025 price rise and CleanTech charging, which trims emissions for sustainability-minded buyers. White-space innovation is focusing on PFAS-optimized carbons, pecan-shell feedstock, and microwave activation that reduces energy consumption, while research into three-dimensional graphene electrodes explores high-capacitance paths for future supercapacitors
United States Activated Carbon Industry Leaders
Cabot Corporation
Ingevity
Kuraray Co., Ltd
JACOBI CARBONS GROUP
Carbon Activated Corporation
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order

Recent Industry Developments
- August 2025: Arq, Inc. inaugurated its inaugural Granular Activated Carbon production line at the Red River Plant in Colorado. The operations team at Arq, Inc. started refining production processes to meet the set nameplate capacity.
- May 2024: Kuraray Co., Ltd, one of the world's largest activated carbon manufacturers, chose Calgon Carbon Corporation to take over the industrial reactivated carbon business from Sprint Environmental Services, LLC.
United States Activated Carbon Market Report Scope
The United States activated carbon market report includes:
| Powdered Activated Carbon |
| Granular Activated Carbon |
| Extruded or Pelletized Activated Carbon |
| Gas Purification |
| Water Purification |
| Metal Extraction |
| Medicine |
| Other Applications |
| Water Treatment |
| Food and Beverage |
| Healthcare |
| Automotive |
| Industrial Processing |
| Other End-user Industries |
| By Product Type | Powdered Activated Carbon |
| Granular Activated Carbon | |
| Extruded or Pelletized Activated Carbon | |
| By Raw Material | Gas Purification |
| Water Purification | |
| Metal Extraction | |
| Medicine | |
| Other Applications | |
| By End-User Industry | Water Treatment |
| Food and Beverage | |
| Healthcare | |
| Automotive | |
| Industrial Processing | |
| Other End-user Industries |
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What volume does the United States activated carbon market reach by 2031?
The market volume is estimated at 224.07 kilotons for 2026 and is forecast to hit 267.66 kilotons by 2031 under a 3.62% CAGR trajectory.
Which end-user sector drives growth after 2026?
Water treatment leads both in current share and fastest growth, expanding at 4.11% through 2031 as PFAS rules take effect.
Why is granular carbon preferred for PFAS removal?
EPA designates granular activated carbon as Best Available Technology because packed beds consistently reach the 4 ppt contaminant ceiling when properly maintained.
How do high energy costs influence supply?
Virgin steam activation requires up to 1,000°C, so producers shift toward reactivation to cut energy by as much as 70% and lower emissions.
What substitutes challenge activated carbon?
Ion-exchange resins, nanofiltration membranes, biochar composites, and natural zeolites offer targeted removal in niches but have yet to displace carbon’s broad use.



