Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Market Size and Share

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The transcatheter aortic valve replacement market was valued at USD 6.62 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 10.55 billion by 2030, equating to a 9.78% CAGR during the period. Strong growth comes from broader clinical indications, device miniaturization, and expanding global access pathways that position TAVR as the default therapy for severe aortic stenosis rather than only a high-risk alternative to open surgery. The FDA’s 2025 approval of SAPIEN 3 for asymptomatic disease effectively doubled the treatable population and triggered rapid adoption momentum in North America. Valve-in-valve procedures are emerging as a second growth vector by offering less invasive solutions for failed surgical bioprostheses. On the supply side, polymer-based leaflets and AI-guided delivery systems improve durability and precision, allowing physicians to consider TAVR for younger, lower-risk cohorts. Regional expansion, particularly in Asia-Pacific, intensifies competition as local manufacturers secure domestic approvals and lower price points.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By type of device, balloon-expandable valves led with 58.35% of transcatheter aortic valve replacement market share in 2024, while mechanically and hybrid expandable valves are projected to grow at 15.25% CAGR through 2030. 
  • By procedure, transfemoral access accounted for 89.53% of the transcatheter aortic valve replacement market size in 2024; transaortic access is poised to expand at 12.85% CAGR to 2030. 
  • By material, nitinol frames captured 52.62% share of the transcatheter aortic valve replacement market size in 2024, whereas polymer composites are advancing at a 13.52% CAGR. 
  • By end user, hospitals retained 69.72% revenue share in 2024, but ambulatory surgical centers are set to register a 12.22% CAGR through 2030 within the transcatheter aortic valve replacement market.
  • By geography, North America commanded 43.82% share in 2024; the Asia-Pacific region is forecast to grow at 12.31% CAGR, making it the fastest-expanding cluster in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement market.

Segment Analysis

By Type of Device: Balloon-Expandable Dominance Faces Innovation Challenge

Balloon-expandable valves generated the largest revenue share at 58.35% in 2024, reinforcing their status as the benchmark platform within the transcatheter aortic valve replacement market. This position stems from predictable deployment and long-term data that comfort physicians managing complex comorbidities. The transcatheter aortic valve replacement market size for mechanically and hybrid expandable valves is projected to post a 15.25% CAGR through 2030, aided by repositioning capabilities that better address non-circular annuli and previously implanted surgical valves.

Mechanical-hybrid innovations borrow from both balloon and self-expanding designs, giving operators retrieval flexibility absent in earlier irreversible deployments. Major manufacturers are investing in polymer leaflets, low-profile sheaths, and AI-navigation to reduce complication rates and extend durability—critical factors as indications broaden to patients under 70 years. This competitive evolution is anticipated to redistribute revenue share but not immediately dethrone balloon-expandable devices, which still accumulate broad procedural familiarity and outcome data.

Market Share
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Procedure: Transfemoral Access Consolidates While Alternative Routes Evolve

Transfemoral access reached 89.53% utilization in 2024, reflecting advances in delivery profiles, vascular closure, and operator proficiency that removed many anatomic exclusions. The transcatheter aortic valve replacement market now sees alternative transaortic routes growing at 12.85% CAGR, especially for heavily calcified or small femoral arteries. 

Cardiac teams employ 3-D CT reconstruction to map optimal insertion angles, minimizing trauma and boosting one-year survival metrics. Transapical access continues to decline as less invasive alternatives mature, yet remains an option in select redo thoracotomy patients. Training emphasis has shifted to procedural versatility, ensuring a comprehensive access toolkit supportive of ever-more diverse patient anatomies.

By Material: Nitinol Leadership Challenged by Polymer Innovation

Nitinol’s 52.62% share derived from its shape-memory properties suits self-expanding valves, anchoring its dominance in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement market. However, polymer composites are gaining interest; the segment is expected to expand at 13.52% CAGR through 2030. Developers highlight better calcification resistance, thromboresistance, and extended hemodynamic stability versus animal pericardium. 

Supply concerns surface as nitinol sourcing concentrates in limited geographies. Consequently, manufacturers diversify raw-material procurement and invest in polymer R&D to lower exposure. Stainless-steel and cobalt-chromium frames maintain niche relevance in balloon-expandable systems demanding rigid radial force.

Market Share
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By End User: Hospital Dominance Shifts Toward Outpatient Models

Hospitals represented 69.72% of global revenue in 2024, but ambulatory surgical centers show the fastest 12.22% CAGR, evidencing payers’ preference for lower-cost settings. US ASC procedure volumes rose 2.8% year-on-year in 2024, with cardiology leading gains. 

ASC expansion pushes device makers to generate real-world evidence supporting same-day discharge safety, while operators refine fast-track recovery pathways. Hybrid cardiac centers located near tertiary hospitals ensure emergency backup, providing confidence for complex cases transitioning out of inpatient suites.

Geography Analysis

North America contributed 43.82% of global revenue in 2024, reflecting mature reimbursement, early technology adoption, and the largest installed base of certified TAVR programs. Growth here moderates as penetration nears structural ceilings, but procedure volume still climbs due to the asymptomatic indication expansion and robust valve-in-valve demand. CMS reimbursement updates continue to shape utilization but rarely curtail momentum in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement market.

Asia-Pacific is forecast to register a 12.31% CAGR, the quickest worldwide. China exemplifies this arc: domestic manufacturers such as MicroPort gained NMPA clearance for third-generation systems in 2025, lowering costs and increasing access among a rapidly ageing population[3]MicroPort, “VitaFlow Liberty Flex Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation System Receives Market Approval from NMPA,” microport.com. Japan, with national coverage, posts one of the world’s highest per-capita procedure rates, whereas India advances more slowly given out-of-pocket pay models.

Europe maintains steady volumes with reimbursement stability in Germany, France, and the Nordics. Ongoing guideline endorsements and registry-based quality tracking encourage physicians to steer eligible patients toward minimally invasive solutions. Latin America and the Middle East show gradual growth tied to economic cycles and private insurance uptake. Market entry strategies hinge on distributor alliances and tailored training programs to overcome workforce constraints.

Growth Rate
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The transcatheter aortic valve replacement market remains concentrated, with Edwards Lifesciences and Medtronic anchoring share through broad portfolios and extensive clinical evidence. Boston Scientific’s 2025 withdrawal, after consecutive FDA setbacks, underscores high regulatory hurdles and reinforces incumbents’ positions. 

Manufacturers increasingly compete on durability claims, frame flexibility, and leaflet technology rather than price. AI-integrated delivery catheters and real-time hemodynamic monitoring differentiate offerings while amplifying procedural safety. Geographic expansion strategies involve partnering with regional value analysis committees and fostering local manufacturing, as seen with MicroPort’s supply chain localization in China. Intellectual-property disputes, such as Meril vs Edwards in Europe, indicate sustained patent significance.

Second-tier challengers focus on niche anatomies, including purely transcatheter solutions for pure aortic regurgitation and ultra-low profile devices suitable for small annuli prevalent in Asian populations. Suppliers of adjunctive technologies—imaging, embolic protection, and closure devices—forge ecosystem alliances, boosting cross-selling and procedure standardization throughout the transcatheter aortic valve replacement industry.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Industry Leaders

  1. Bracco SpA

  2. Medtronic plc

  3. Abbott Laboratories

  4. Boston Scientific Corp.

  5. Edwards Lifesciences Corp.

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • January 2025: MicroPort CardioFlow received NMPA approval in China for the VitaFlow Liberty Flex TAVI system, intensifying domestic competition.
  • December 2024: Abbott completed first-in-human use of its AI-guided balloon-expandable TAVI platform, introducing software-driven precision deployment.

Table of Contents for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Rising Prevalence Of Aortic Stenosis In Ageing Populations
    • 4.2.2 Demand Shift Toward Minimally-Invasive Cardiac Therapies
    • 4.2.3 Expanding Indications Into Low-To-Moderate Surgical-Risk Cohorts
    • 4.2.4 Next-Gen Leaflet Durability & Embolic-Protection Innovations
    • 4.2.5 Valve-In-Valve Usage For Failed Surgical Bioprostheses
    • 4.2.6 Bundled-Payment Models Boosting Hospital Adoption In OECD
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 High Device & Procedure Cost Burden On Payers
    • 4.3.2 Stroke, Conduction Disturbances & PV-Leak Complications
    • 4.3.3 Inconsistent Reimbursement In Ems & Some APAC Countries
    • 4.3.4 Nitinol Supply-Chain Bottlenecks Limiting Production Scale
  • 4.4 Porter's Five Forces
    • 4.4.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.4.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.4.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.4.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.4.5 Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

  • 5.1 By Type of Device
    • 5.1.1 Self-expanding Valves
    • 5.1.2 Balloon-expandable Valves
    • 5.1.3 Mechanically & Hybrid Expandable Valves
  • 5.2 By Procedure
    • 5.2.1 Transfemoral
    • 5.2.2 Transapical
    • 5.2.3 Transaortic
  • 5.3 By Material
    • 5.3.1 Nitinol
    • 5.3.2 Cobalt-Chromium
    • 5.3.3 Stainless Steel
    • 5.3.4 Polymer Composites
  • 5.4 By End User
    • 5.4.1 Hospitals
    • 5.4.2 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    • 5.4.3 Cardiovascular Centers
    • 5.4.4 Cath Labs & Research Institutes
  • 5.5 Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 Germany
    • 5.5.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.3 France
    • 5.5.2.4 Italy
    • 5.5.2.5 Spain
    • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 Japan
    • 5.5.3.3 India
    • 5.5.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.5 Australia
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.4.1 GCC
    • 5.5.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5 South America
    • 5.5.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Edwards Lifesciences Corp.
    • 6.3.2 Medtronic plc
    • 6.3.3 Boston Scientific Corp.
    • 6.3.4 Abbott Laboratories
    • 6.3.5 Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd
    • 6.3.6 JenaValve Technology Inc.
    • 6.3.7 Artivion Inc. (ex-CryoLife)
    • 6.3.8 Lepu Medical Technology Co.
    • 6.3.9 Venus Medtech (Hangzhou) Inc.
    • 6.3.10 MicroPort Scientific Corp.
    • 6.3.11 Transcatheter Technologies GmbH
    • 6.3.12 Bracco SpA
    • 6.3.13 Peijia Medical Ltd.
    • 6.3.14 Balanced Medical Solutions LLC
    • 6.3.15 Xeltis BV
    • 6.3.16 NaviGate Cardiac Structures Inc.
    • 6.3.17 HighLife SAS
    • 6.3.18 Colibri Heart Valve LLC
    • 6.3.19 FoldaValve Ltd.

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) market as all commercially marketed catheter-delivered prosthetic aortic valves, their dedicated delivery systems, and associated implantation accessories that enable minimally invasive replacement of native stenotic valves in adults who are judged high, intermediate, or low surgical risk. Devices intended exclusively for pre-clinical research or non-aortic transcatheter valve therapies fall outside this scope.

Scope exclusion: surgical aortic valve replacement devices and repair accessories are not counted.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Type of Device
    • Self-expanding Valves
    • Balloon-expandable Valves
    • Mechanically & Hybrid Expandable Valves
  • By Procedure
    • Transfemoral
    • Transapical
    • Transaortic
  • By Material
    • Nitinol
    • Cobalt-Chromium
    • Stainless Steel
    • Polymer Composites
  • By End User
    • Hospitals
    • Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    • Cardiovascular Centers
    • Cath Labs & Research Institutes
  • Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East and Africa
      • GCC
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East and Africa
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Mordor analysts interviewed interventional cardiologists, structural-heart program directors, cath-lab managers, and reimbursement specialists across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. These conversations clarified real-world patient selection thresholds, procedural mix shifts, negotiated ASP corridors, and likely timing of next-generation valve launches, enabling us to confirm assumptions and reconcile desk findings.

Desk Research

We began with procedure-volume and disease-burden datasets available from open repositories such as the WHO Global Health Estimates, OECD Health Statistics, the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Part B claims files, and Eurostat hospital-discharge tables. Regulatory approval notices on FDA and EMA portals, patent families extracted through Questel, and peer-reviewed outcome studies in journals like JACC supplied technology uptake signals. Company 10-Ks, investor decks, and press releases were screened on Dow Jones Factiva for shipment trends and average selling price (ASP) commentary, which anchor the revenue side of our model. These sources illustrate, rather than exhaust, the secondary material we mined to establish the evidence base.

A second desk pass used trade-association briefs (Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions) plus customs dashboards such as Volza to refine the regional flow of finished valves and delivery kits, flagging anomalies for analyst review. The sources listed here are representative, and many additional public and proprietary references contributed to data collection and validation.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

Our top-down model starts with treated-patient pools reconstructed from national procedure registries and payer claims; volumes are multiplied by regional ASP medians, then reconciled with sampled manufacturer revenue lines to catch under-coding or inventory timing effects. Bottom-up cross-checks, such as supplier roll-ups and cath-lab channel checks, help fine-tune totals. Key variables include the prevalence of severe aortic stenosis in 70+ cohorts, TAVR penetration rate among eligible patients, share of transfemoral access, mean device ASP trends, and reimbursement-policy shifts. A multivariate regression, incorporating aging-population curves, risk-stratification adoption, and valve-technology upgrade cycles, projects demand through 2030. Gaps in bottom-up evidence are bridged using conservative elasticity factors agreed upon during primary interviews.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs pass variance screens against independent procedure tallies; currency conversions are standardized quarterly, and any anomaly triggers a senior analyst review before final sign-off. Reports refresh yearly; interim updates are issued when regulatory, reimbursement, or competitive events materially alter volume or price baselines.

Why Mordor's Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Baseline Commands Reliability

Published TAVR estimates often diverge because firms choose different device mixes, patient-risk pools, and refresh cadences.

Key gap drivers include: some studies fold surgical valve revenue into totals; others apply flat ASP deflators that ignore premium-cohort pricing; several models extrapolate limited U.S. registry data globally without adjusting for delayed approvals and payer hurdles elsewhere. Mordor's scope, variable selection, and yearly refresh cycle minimize such distortions.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 6.62 bn (2025) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 6.83 bn (2024) Global Consultancy A Includes surgical valve kits; uses single-region ASP applied worldwide
USD 5.64 bn (2024) Industry Journal B Excludes low-risk patient cohort; relies on historical growth extrapolation
USD 7.22 bn (2025) Regional Consultancy C Uses list-price ASP without volume-weighted discounts

These comparisons show that Mordor's disciplined triangulation and timely updates deliver a balanced, decision-ready baseline that clients can trace to transparent variables and reproducible steps.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current global value of the transcatheter aortic valve replacement market?

The market is valued at USD 6.62 billion in 2025 and is projected to hit USD 10.55 billion by 2030.

Which region shows the fastest growth in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement market?

Asia-Pacific leads with a 12.31% forecast CAGR through 2030, driven by ageing demographics and local manufacturing approvals.

Why are ambulatory surgical centers gaining share in TAVR procedures?

Same-day discharge protocols and bundled payments cut total costs up to 50%, making ASCs attractive for payers and patients.

Which device segment is expected to grow the quickest?

Mechanically and hybrid expandable valves are projected at a 15.25% CAGR due to repositioning features for complex anatomies.

How are polymer composite valves influencing future adoption?

Polymers promise improved durability and lower calcification, encouraging use in younger, low-risk patients who need long-lasting implants.

What key restraint could slow growth in emerging markets?

High device prices relative to healthcare budgets and uneven reimbursement policies limit procedure adoption outside developed economies.

Page last updated on:

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Report Snapshots