Space Batteries Market Size and Share

Space Batteries Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Space Batteries Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The space batteries market size stands at USD 3.40 billion in 2025 and is forecasted to reach USD 5.41 billion in 2030, reflecting a 9.73% CAGR. Space-grade lithium-ion (Li-ion) technology dominates the value mix, while deep-space programs and small-satellite constellations spur volume growth. Sustained public funding, illustrated by NASA’s FY 2025 Space Technology budget of USD 1.18 billion, anchors near-term demand, and rising qualification of radiation-hardened solid-state chemistries extends the long-term growth runway.[1]Source: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, “FY 2025 Budget Request,” NASA.GOV Platform builders increasingly favor batteries above 200 Wh/kg to trim launch mass, and suppliers respond with vertically integrated lines to stabilize lead times. Regional spending profiles diverge: North America prioritizes lunar infrastructure, Europe accelerates GEO telecom refresh cycles, and Asia-Pacific invests in cost-optimized LEO fleets. At the same time, supply-chain pressure on lithium and cobalt and stricter ECSS test matrices temper near-term margin expansion.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By battery type, Li-ion led with 73.65% revenue share in 2024; solid-state and lithium-metal are projected to post the fastest 15.60% CAGR through 2030.
  • By platform, satellites commanded a 67.80% share of the space batteries market size in 2024, while planetary landers and rovers are expected to advance at a 13.40% CAGR to 2030.
  • By orbit class, LEO captured 62.10% of the space batteries market share in 2024; deep-space and interplanetary applications record the highest 14.60% CAGR.
  • By energy-density band, 100-200 Wh/kg systems held 53.20% share in 2024; batteries above 200 Wh/kg are forecasted to expand at a 13.15% CAGR.
  • By function, secondary rechargeable units accounted for 78.62% of the space batteries market size in 2024 and will grow at a 10.54% CAGR.
  • By geography, North America retained a 37.90% share in 2024, whereas the Asia-Pacific is on course for the quickest 12.65% CAGR through 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Battery Type: Energy-Dense Lithium-ion Retains the Lead While Solid-State Gains Traction

Li-ion occupied 73.65% of the space batteries market share in 2024, reflecting decades of operating data and manufacturing yield improvements. Flight heritage approaching 620 million cell-hours underpins procurement confidence, and high-nickel NCA and NCM blends now deliver 214 Wh/kg at pack level.[2]Source: Saft, “Taking Space Power to the Next Generation,” SAFT.COM The segment also benefits from mature supply chains spanning electrode foil to custom pressure vessels. The space batteries market size tied to solid-state and lithium-metal chemistries will accelerate at a 15.60% CAGR, driven by mission profiles that prize 400 Wh/kg specific energy and intrinsic resistance to thermal runaway. Nickel-cadmium (NiCd) and nickel-hydrogen (NiH2) systems survive in niche environments—particularly where −60 °C storage or unlimited trickle-charge endurance outweigh mass savings. Meanwhile, silver-zinc retains relevance for launch vehicles that need burst power at ignition and stage separation.

Momentum toward solid-state hinges on scaling sintered ceramic electrolytes to satellite-grade formats without cracking and demonstrating cycle life beyond 1,000 cycles. Leading suppliers pair solid-state stacks with flex-rigid battery management boards to mitigate micro-vibration-induced delamination. Funding from public agencies offsets early yield losses, but the complete transition will span the forecast horizon. Over the period, hybrid packs combining Li-ion strings for baseline loads and emerging chemistries for peak draws will proliferate.

Space Batteries Market: Market Share by Battery Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Platform: Satellites Drive Volume While Planetary Landers Command Premium Growth

Satellites accounted for 67.80% of the space batteries market share in 2024, reflecting their position as the core volume driver of the sector. Standardized battery requirements and large-lot manufacturing allow constellation operators to achieve a favorable cost per watt-hour, particularly for fleets such as SpaceX, OneWeb, and Amazon’s Project Kuiper that plan thousands of launches together. Typical satellite buses integrate 50–200 Wh battery systems to handle rapid eclipse cycling and tight mass budgets, giving qualified Li-ion chemistries a decisive edge in procurement contests. Volume demand also enables suppliers to amortize the high non-recurring engineering costs of ECSS qualification, lowering unit prices for follow-on orders. Launch vehicles form a smaller but technically demanding sub-segment that needs burst-power packs for ignition and stage separation. In contrast, crewed spacecraft and space stations specify human-rated batteries with redundant safety circuits and pressure-relief features to meet stringent flight-worthiness rules.

Planetary landers and rovers represent the fastest-growing platform class, advancing at a 13.40% CAGR through 2030 as Artemis-linked lunar assets and Mars reconnaissance craft move from concept to hardware. These missions require multi-kWh arrays capable of remaining dormant for years, then activating flawlessly in environments spanning −150 °C nights to dust-filled noon highs above 100 °C. Qualification campaigns include extended thermal-vacuum soaks, vibration to simulate launch and landing shocks, and radiation testing beyond deep-space cruise levels to secure mission assurance where repair is impossible. Mitsubishi Electric’s award to supply Li-ion batteries for NASA’s Gateway lunar platform underscores how premium, radiation-hardened packs reshape supplier portfolios. As planetary exploration broadens, battery vendors that demonstrate heritage on landers and rovers can command higher margins even as the wider space batteries market size scales with satellite volumes.

By Orbit Class: LEO Remains Core, Deep-Space Spurs Innovation

The space batteries market recorded a 62.10% share in LEO deployments during 2024, spurred by broadband and Earth-observation networks that value cost per watt-hour above all. Those fleets tolerate state-of-charge windows down to 20% during eclipse to frequent ground passes. Though fewer in number, deep-space craft prompt radical design leaps: cells must shrug off galactic cosmic rays and handle wide temperature swings without convective cooling. The segment’s 14.60% CAGR reflects new Artemis cargo landers and sample-return vehicles.

MEO navigation platforms require enhanced radiation shielding and low self-discharge to preserve clock stability. GEO com-sat batteries face prolonged eclipses lasting up to 72 minutes; thus, Li-ion strings adopt thicker current collectors and high-temperature binders. As spacecraft shift from chemical to electric propulsion, battery peak power demands rise, encouraging adoption of higher voltage architectures.

Space Batteries Market: Market Share by Orbit Class
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Energy-Density Band: Mid-Range Dominates; More than 200 Wh/kg Segment Surges

Batteries between 100 Wh/kg and 200 Wh/kg provided 53.20% of 2024 shipments, balancing reliability and cost. Designs draw on mature 18650 and 21700 cells repackaged into welded aluminum enclosures with dual-redundant pressure-relief valves. The greater than 200 Wh/kg tier, projected to post a 13.15% CAGR, stakes its appeal on mass savings that translate into heavier payloads or extra propellant. Development emphasis falls on silicon-rich anodes and high-nickel cathodes stabilized by advanced separators free from PFAS compounds where feasible.

Sub-100 Wh/kg packs serve sounding rockets and re-entry capsules that confront extreme thermal shocks. Even so, the broader market expects to cross the 300 Wh/kg threshold in pilot flights by 2028 as sintered solid electrolytes and lithium–sulfur variants mature.

By Function: Secondary Batteries Dominate Long-Life Missions

Secondary rechargeable systems captured 78.62% of 2024 revenue because most spacecraft require thousands of eclipse cycles. Slow calendar aging and robust state-of-health algorithms underpin 10.54% CAGR through 2030. The Space Batteries industry concentrates its R&D budgets on silicon-based anodes that reduce swelling and extend calendar life beyond 15 years.

Primary batteries remain indispensable for launch vehicles and planetary probes for one-time bursts. Silver-zinc modules achieve gravimetric power densities above 400 W/kg but suffer limited cycle life, confining them to expendable stages. Mission architects weigh the trade-offs carefully: a rising number of landers now select hybrid setups pairing primary packs for descent burns with rechargeable arrays for surface operations.

Geography Analysis

North America led the space batteries market with a 37.90% share in 2024. Its dominance stems from NASA’s consistent procurement pipeline and tier-one primes that collectively award multi-year battery contracts. Saft’s Jacksonville plant expansion to 5 GWh annual capacity underscores the region’s commitment to domestic cell supply.[3]Source: Electronics Specifier, “Saft Gears Up for Li-ion Battery Production in the Americas,” ELECTRONICSSPECIFIER.COM The Inflation Reduction Act adds investment credits that partially offset the cost of US-sourced cobalt and nickel intermediates. Canada supplies specialty thermal insulation blankets and pressure vessels, while Mexico machines non-flight ground-support fixtures.

Europe contributes a robust demand pool anchored by ESA flagship programs and telecom satellite renewals. French, German, and Italian subsidiaries of global battery groups run R&D centers focusing on ceramic solid-state stacks and Europe-specific PFAS-free separators. Compliance with REACH regulations, alongside emerging PFAS bans, will steer chemistry roadmaps toward fluorine-free binders. U.K. small-satellite builders amplify volume, whereas Eastern European suppliers provide casings and non-critical structural hardware.

Asia-Pacific posts the strongest 12.65% CAGR. India aligns with its target of a USD 44 billion space economy by 2033, leveraging public-private partnerships to erect cell assembly lines co-located with launcher integration facilities. Japan’s satellite manufacturers prefer domestically produced batteries, as evidenced by the contract to supply Li-ion packs for the Gateway platform. China’s vertically integrated ecosystem essentially serves national programs, but technology-transfer rules limit Western participation. South Korea advances pouch-cell coating methods adopted from its EV sector, and Australia funds laboratory-scale Li-S research aimed at lunar surface rovers.

Space Batteries Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The market remains moderately consolidated. Saft, EaglePicher, GS Yuasa, and ABSL hold entrenched positions through long-standing flight heritage and vertically integrated lines. Saft reports more than 35,000 cells in orbit across 768 satellites, creating unrivaled reliability datasets. Competitive leverage centers on qualification speed, in-house radiation testing, and the ability to supply mixed chemistries under single contracts.

Investment patterns show incumbents broadening chemistries: Saft partners with French institutes on solid-state, and GS Yuasa adapts automotive silicon-anode technology to GEO packs. New entrants focus on narrow niches, such as solid-state for micro-sats or lithium–sulfur for deep-space, where smaller lot sizes mitigate qualification cost disadvantages. M&A remains selective; primes prefer long-term supply agreements over outright acquisitions to preserve multi-vendor resilience.

Pricing is 20–25% higher than terrestrial equivalents due to stringent screening and an acceptance campaign that can double component costs. Nevertheless, constellation buyers push for cost efficiencies via frame contracts covering thousands of packs, tipping negotiation power slightly toward large fleet operators. Future competition will hinge on mastering PFAS-free separators and demonstrating >300 Wh/kg in orbital service.

Space Batteries Industry Leaders

  1. Saft Groupe SA

  2. GS Yuasa Corporation

  3. EnerSys

  4. Airbus SE

  5. EaglePicher Technologies, LLC

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Space Batteries Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • September 2025: KULR Technology Group, Inc. launched six new commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) versions of its KULR ONE Space (K1S) CubeSat battery line, with capacities ranging from 100 to 500Wh. These batteries are designed to meet the growing demands of customers in the space sector and showcase the company's innovation in frontier technologies.
  • December 2024: KULR Technology Group, Inc. announced plans to launch its KULR ONE Space (K1S) battery via Exolaunch on a SpaceX rideshare mission in 2026. This milestone aligns with KULR’s focus on advanced battery systems for the growing space battery market.

Table of Contents for Space Batteries Industry Report

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Rapid proliferation of small-satellite constellations
    • 4.2.2 Migration from nickel-hydrogen to high-energy-density Li-ion chemistries
    • 4.2.3 Government-funded deep-space and lunar missions demanding ultra-long cycle life
    • 4.2.4 On-orbit servicing and manufacturing creating recharge-intensive duty cycles
    • 4.2.5 Qualification of solid-state batteries for radiation environments
    • 4.2.6 AI-enabled health-diagnostics extending battery lifetime
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Stringent radiation and thermal qualification inflating cost and lead-time
    • 4.3.2 Supply-chain dependence on space-qualified lithium cells and raw materials
    • 4.3.3 High R&D and certification costs limiting new entrants
    • 4.3.4 Looming PFAS bans squeezing advanced separator availability
  • 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.7.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.7.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.7.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.7.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.7.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 5.1 By Battery Type
    • 5.1.1 Lithium-ion (Li-ion)
    • 5.1.2 Nickel-Cadmium (NiCd)
    • 5.1.3 Nickel-hydrogen (NiH2)
    • 5.1.4 Silver-zinc
    • 5.1.5 Solid-state/Lithium-metal
    • 5.1.6 Other
  • 5.2 By Platform
    • 5.2.1 Satellites
    • 5.2.2 Launch Vehicles
    • 5.2.3 Crewed Spacecraft and Space Stations
    • 5.2.4 Planetary Landers and Rovers
  • 5.3 By Orbit Class
    • 5.3.1 Low Earth Orbit (LEO)
    • 5.3.2 Medium Earth Orbit (MEO)
    • 5.3.3 Geostationary Orbit (GEO)
    • 5.3.4 Deep-Space / Interplanetary
  • 5.4 By Energy-Density Band
    • 5.4.1 Less than 100 Wh/kg
    • 5.4.2 100–200 Wh/kg
    • 5.4.3 More than 200 Wh/kg
  • 5.5 By Function
    • 5.5.1 Primary (Non-Rechargeable)
    • 5.5.2 Secondary (Rechargeable)
  • 5.6 By Geography
    • 5.6.1 North America
    • 5.6.1.1 United States
    • 5.6.1.2 Canada
    • 5.6.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.6.2 Europe
    • 5.6.2.1 United Kingdom
    • 5.6.2.2 Germany
    • 5.6.2.3 France
    • 5.6.2.4 Italy
    • 5.6.2.5 Russia
    • 5.6.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.6.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.3.1 China
    • 5.6.3.2 India
    • 5.6.3.3 Japan
    • 5.6.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.6.3.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.4 South America
    • 5.6.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.6.4.2 Rest of South America
    • 5.6.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.6.5.1 Middle East
    • 5.6.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.6.5.1.2 Israel
    • 5.6.5.1.3 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.6.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.6.5.2 Africa
    • 5.6.5.2.1 South Africa
    • 5.6.5.2.2 Rest of Africa

6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Saft Groupe SA
    • 6.4.2 EaglePicher Technologies, LLC
    • 6.4.3 GS Yuasa Corporation
    • 6.4.4 EnerSys
    • 6.4.5 Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
    • 6.4.6 Arotech Corporation
    • 6.4.7 Airbus SE
    • 6.4.8 Kanadevia Corporation
    • 6.4.9 AAC Clyde Space AB
    • 6.4.10 Berlin Space Technologies GmbH
    • 6.4.11 Ibeos
    • 6.4.12 Space Vector Corporation
    • 6.4.13 Suzhou Everlight Space Technology Co.,Ltd.
    • 6.4.14 Azista BST Aerospace
    • 6.4.15 Blue Canyon Technologies LLC (RTX Corporation)
    • 6.4.16 KULR Technology Group, Inc.

7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Global Space Batteries Market Report Scope

By Battery Type
Lithium-ion (Li-ion)
Nickel-Cadmium (NiCd)
Nickel-hydrogen (NiH2)
Silver-zinc
Solid-state/Lithium-metal
Other
By Platform
Satellites
Launch Vehicles
Crewed Spacecraft and Space Stations
Planetary Landers and Rovers
By Orbit Class
Low Earth Orbit (LEO)
Medium Earth Orbit (MEO)
Geostationary Orbit (GEO)
Deep-Space / Interplanetary
By Energy-Density Band
Less than 100 Wh/kg
100–200 Wh/kg
More than 200 Wh/kg
By Function
Primary (Non-Rechargeable)
Secondary (Rechargeable)
By Geography
North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe United Kingdom
Germany
France
Italy
Russia
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
India
Japan
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
South America Brazil
Rest of South America
Middle East and Africa Middle East Saudi Arabia
Israel
United Arab Emirates
Rest of Middle East
Africa South Africa
Rest of Africa
By Battery Type Lithium-ion (Li-ion)
Nickel-Cadmium (NiCd)
Nickel-hydrogen (NiH2)
Silver-zinc
Solid-state/Lithium-metal
Other
By Platform Satellites
Launch Vehicles
Crewed Spacecraft and Space Stations
Planetary Landers and Rovers
By Orbit Class Low Earth Orbit (LEO)
Medium Earth Orbit (MEO)
Geostationary Orbit (GEO)
Deep-Space / Interplanetary
By Energy-Density Band Less than 100 Wh/kg
100–200 Wh/kg
More than 200 Wh/kg
By Function Primary (Non-Rechargeable)
Secondary (Rechargeable)
By Geography North America United States
Canada
Mexico
Europe United Kingdom
Germany
France
Italy
Russia
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
India
Japan
South Korea
Rest of Asia-Pacific
South America Brazil
Rest of South America
Middle East and Africa Middle East Saudi Arabia
Israel
United Arab Emirates
Rest of Middle East
Africa South Africa
Rest of Africa
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current value of the Space Batteries market?

The Space Batteries market size is USD 3.40 billion in 2025 and is set to reach USD 5.41 billion by 2030, , reflecting a 9.73% CAGR.

Which battery type leads in satellite adoption?

Lithium-ion (Li-ion) holds 73.65% share thanks to high energy density and extensive flight heritage.

Which orbit class shows the fastest growth?

Deep-space and interplanetary missions post the highest 14.60% CAGR through 2030 as lunar and Mars programs expand.

Which region grows the quickest?

Asia-Pacific registers a 12.65% CAGR fueled by India’s expanding launch sector and Japan’s satellite manufacturing.

What is the main restraint hindering new suppliers?

Stringent radiation and thermal qualification can extend design cycles up to 24 months and add millions to development cost.

How are suppliers addressing PFAS regulations?

Vendors are testing fluorine-free separators and ceramic solid-state layers to meet upcoming environmental standards.

Page last updated on: