Pharmaceutical Membrane Filtration Market Size and Share
Pharmaceutical Membrane Filtration Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Pharmaceutical Membrane Filtration Market size is estimated at USD 12.41 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 19.57 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 9.55% during the forecast period (2025-2030).
Demand stems from the surge in biologics, gene therapies, and vaccine programs that require sterile, high-performance filters. The sector also benefits from regulatory pressure to prove viral clearance and from single-use systems that heighten production agility while curbing cross-contamination. Investments in nanofiltration, continuous processing, and real-time analytics further lift adoption, especially for virus removal, protein concentration, and water-for-injection operations. North America retains a leading position thanks to an entrenched bioprocessing base and clear guidance from the FDA, while Asia-Pacific gains momentum on the back of large-scale capacity additions and biotech incentives.
Key Report Takeaways
- By material, polyethersulfone led with 32.84% revenue share in 2024; polyvinylidene difluoride is projected to advance at a 10.01% CAGR to 2030.
- By technique, microfiltration accounted for 44.32% of the pharmaceutical membrane filtration market size in 2024 while nanofiltration is forecast to grow at 12.95% CAGR through 2030.
- By process stage, sterile filtration held 35.87% of pharmaceutical membrane filtration market share in 2024; bulk drug substance clarification is set to expand at 14.58% CAGR up to 2030.
- By scale, commercial production commanded 53.64% of the pharmaceutical membrane filtration market in 2024; laboratory scale exhibits a 10.39% CAGR through 2030.
- By geography, North America captured 36.55% of the pharmaceutical membrane filtration market share in 2024 while Asia-Pacific posts the fastest 11.67% CAGR to 2030.
Global Pharmaceutical Membrane Filtration Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
---|---|---|---|
Increasing adoption of single-use technologies | +1.8% | Global, strongest in North America and Europe | Medium term (2-4 years) |
Expansion of biologics and gene therapy pipelines | +2.1% | North America and Europe core, expanding to APAC | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
Stringent regulatory requirements | +1.2% | Global, with EU leading PUPSIT mandates | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
Advancements in nanofiltration technology | +1.5% | Global, R&D concentrated in developed markets | Medium term (2-4 years) |
Rising R&D investments | +1.0% | North America, Europe, and emerging APAC markets | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
Expanding pharmaceutical manufacturing in emerging markets | +1.4% | APAC core, Latin America and MEA | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
Source: Mordor Intelligence
Increasing Adoption of Single-Use Technologies
Single-use filtration assemblies shorten change-over times by up to 50% and remove cleaning validation, making them a central pillar of modern biologics facilities. Compatibility with hollow-fiber tangential-flow designs lets producers retrofit legacy lines quickly. Flexible bag-based systems permit parallel campaigns for personalized therapies, while built-in sensors transmit critical quality data that satisfy FDA expectations for continuous monitoring. Cost advantages rise as utilities and labor shrink, and waste volumes decline thanks to lighter construction materials. As gene therapy volumes scale, single-use cartridges rated to >99.999% endotoxin removal enable rapid batch turnaround without risking cross-product carryover.[1]Masahito Tahashi, “Planova FG1: Next-Generation Virus Filter,” asahi-kasei.com The model aligns with pandemic-preparedness strategies that require fast site deployment and surge capacity.
Expansion of Biologics & Gene Therapy Pipelines
The global biologics pipeline surpasses 10,000 active programs, each requiring robust virus filtration that meets >6 log10 reduction mandates. Plasmid DNA and viral vectors impose high-viscosity loads that spur demand for membranes with optimized pore geometry to avoid shear-induced degradation.[2]Food and Drug Administration, “Q5A(R2) Viral Safety Evaluation,” fda.govAsahi Kasei’s Planova FG1 delivers seven-fold higher flux, cutting process time without compromising retention. Updated Q5A(R2) guidance promotes risk-based validation, encouraging application-specific filter development that supports rapid commercialization. The trend extends to mRNA vaccines, where clarification and sterilization must proceed under low binding conditions to protect fragile lipid nanoparticles.
Stringent Regulatory Requirements
Revised EU Annex 1 enforces Pre-Use Post-Sterilization Integrity Testing that forces manufacturers to integrate real-time leak detection and automated reporting.[3]Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Association, “Annex 1 Sterile Manufacturing Revision,” pda.org Divergent US and EU positions create dual compliance paths, prompting global firms to adopt the stricter standard to avoid repeat qualification. Authorities now expect Failure Modes and Effects Analysis on every filter train, driving uptake of fully automated testers that log events and prevent operator errors. Continuous process verification places extra weight on in-line analytics, increasing capital outlays but accelerating deviation response. PDUFA VII signals ongoing FDA support for advanced manufacturing, reinforcing the business case for cutting-edge filtration.
Advancements in Nanofiltration Technology
Breakthroughs in graphene and MXene layers produce membranes with near-atomic thickness that deliver higher flux at the same selectivity, easing the historical permeability-selectivity trade-off. High-pressure systems now maintain precise 200–1,000 Da cut-offs, letting manufacturers fine-tune protein purification. Solvent-resistant variants enable direct processing of organic reaction streams, removing dry-down steps and saving energy. Optimization studies show nanofiltration throughput can climb from 100 L/m² to 900 L/m² when pH, conductivity, and pressure are balanced, trimming filtration cost per gram of biologic. Predictive modeling software embedded in skid controls accelerates tech transfer by simulating performance on varied feedstocks.
Restraints Impact Analysis
Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
---|---|---|---|
High capital investment | -1.3% | Global, higher in emerging markets | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
Membrane fouling and reduced lifecycle | -1.1% | Global, affecting continuous operations | Medium term (2-4 years) |
Complexity in integration | -0.8% | Developed markets with advanced manufacturing | Medium term (2-4 years) |
Limited awareness in developing regions | -0.6% | APAC emerging markets, Latin America, MEA | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
Source: Mordor Intelligence
High Capital Investment
Commercial-scale filtration suites cost upward of USD 10 million once skids, analytics, and validation are included, a hurdle for small firms and CDMOs. Integration of PAT sensors raises spending further because data historians and cybersecurity layers must be certified. Emerging-market manufacturers often rely on subsidies or partnerships to secure funding, and currency fluctuations can erode budgets. Thermo Fisher’s USD 4.1 billion Solventum purchase shows the size of bets required to stay competitive in purification technology. Multinational companies must duplicate test protocols across regions, swelling capital tied up in duplicate equipment.
Membrane Fouling Issues & Reduced Lifecycle
Protein aggregates, DNA, and lipids form cakes and adsorb on pore walls, cutting permeate flux by 35% if unmanaged. Virus filtration is prone to nanoparticle capture inside depth layers that shift under load, risking breakthrough. Cleaning cycles add downtime and chemical costs, while harsh agents shorten membrane life. Anti-fouling surface treatments and asymmetric pore designs mitigate the effect, but users must validate new materials, extending project timelines. Continuous manufacturing heightens risk because filters stay online longer, making predictive fouling analytics a growing requirement.
Segment Analysis
By Material: PES Dominance Faces PVDF Innovation
PES accounted for 32.84% of the pharmaceutical membrane filtration market in 2024, favored for high chemical resistance and low protein binding. Its hydrophilic nature supports 211 mL/min flow rates with protein adsorption below 1%, enabling consistent yields in mAb purification. Surface sulfonation and PEG grafting deepen hydrophilicity, stretch lifespan, and limit fouling.
PVDF is projected to grow at 10.01% CAGR despite PFAS scrutiny, owing to its low extractables and suitability for final fill lines. Regulatory uncertainty encourages suppliers to devise PFAS-free variants, but users value PVDF’s thermal stability for steam-in-place cycles. Mixed cellulose ester, nylon, and polypropylene membranes satisfy niche lab or cost-sensitive tasks where extreme robustness is not essential. Comparative studies find PES retains permeability under high solids loads while PVDF excels in low-binding sterile filtration. Manufacturers target ultraclean grades that meet ever tighter leachables limits, preserving product purity throughout storage.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Technique: Microfiltration Leads While Nanofiltration Accelerates
Microfiltration held 44.32% revenue share in 2024 due to entrenched use for cell harvesting and bioburden reduction. Resistance-in-series models allow accurate scale-up, ensuring pilot data translate to manufacturing. Continuous microfiltration combined with alternating tangential flow lifts harvest titers for intensified fed-batch cultures. Nanofiltration is set to rise at 12.95% CAGR on the back of vaccine and gene therapy pipelines demanding virus removal under high flux.
Two-dimensional material coatings raise water permeability without sacrificing 20 nm pore exclusion, facilitating >6 log10 virus clearance. Scale-down rigs help define optimal pH and conductivity windows, driving 900% throughput gains when parameters are tuned. Ultrafiltration remains vital for buffer exchange and protein concentration, whereas reverse osmosis handles water treatment for injection systems.
By Process Stage: Sterile Filtration Dominance Challenged by Clarification Growth
Final sterile filtration captured 35.87% of the pharmaceutical membrane filtration market size in 2024, reflecting its role as the last barrier before fill-finish. Authorities demand Brevundimonas diminuta challenge tests that prove absolute retention, prompting widespread use of 0.22 µm PES and PVDF cartridges. Single-use capsule formats enjoy popularity for small campaign drugs because integrity tests can be run in line without product loss.
Bulk drug substance clarification is forecast to climb at 14.58% CAGR as high-cell density cultures raise impurity loads needing depth filtration before chromatographic polishing. Next-generation depth media with dual-layer designs remove DNA and HCP while controlling turbidity. Water and utility filtration, air and gas filters, and cell-harvest steps continue to underpin upstream hygiene, but the shift toward continuous processing increases demand for robust clarification trains that sustain days of operation.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Scale: Commercial Production Leads Laboratory Innovation
Commercial plants made up 53.64% of the pharmaceutical membrane filtration market in 2024, underscoring mature blockbuster portfolios. Integrated suites merge clarification, concentration, and virus filtration on a single skid to minimize footprint. Pilot lines bridge R&D and plant, offering right-first-time tech transfer through matched shear and flux conditions.
Laboratory systems are projected to expand at 10.39% CAGR as gene editing and mRNA research accelerates, fueling demand for flexible bench rigs that evolve into GMP platforms. Scale-down cross-flow cells preserve feed ratios so developers can model fouling and optimize CIP prior to capex approval. Modular designs let users add steps progressively, aligning spend with program milestones and reducing financial exposure.
Geography Analysis
North America retained 36.55% share of the pharmaceutical membrane filtration market in 2024, powered by a dense network of biologics plants and an FDA that endorses advanced manufacturing with clear guidance. Federal incentives for pandemic preparedness sustain spending on high-capacity single-use systems and continuous lines. Europe follows closely, driven by Annex 1 revisions that compel producers to adopt PUPSIT and automated integrity checks. Firms invest in virus filters and data-rich skids to navigate stringent audit expectations.
Asia-Pacific is set to grow at 11.67% CAGR through 2030 as governments pour funds into biotech hubs. Cytiva’s USD 150 million Korean site and MilliporeSigma’s EUR 300 million plant in Daejeon signal the region’s ascent, offering local supply of sterile filters and single-use kits that shorten logistics chains. China and India increase GMP adherence, with close to 90% of Chinese and 100% of Indian biomanagers targeting global market entry. Latin America and the Middle East make incremental progress, led by Brazil and Saudi Arabia, which court CDMOs to diversify their economies. Harmonization of ICH guidelines eases technology transfer, enabling global firms to deploy identical filtration trains across multiple continents.

Competitive Landscape
The pharmaceutical membrane filtration market shows moderate consolidation. Danaher merged Cytiva and Pall, forming a USD 7.5 billion bioprocessing unit that delivers end-to-end filtration and purification. Thermo Fisher broadened its footprint by buying Solventum’s purification business for USD 4.1 billion, linking chromatography resins with single-use systems. Asahi Kasei advances virus filters with Planova FG1, achieving higher flux that shortens cycle times.
Suppliers discriminate through regulatory expertise, especially around PUPSIT and Annex 1, and through digital twins that predict fouling. Parker-Hannifin leverages industrial filtration know-how to address pharmaceutical gas and utility lines, expanding its sector reach. Competition intensifies in Asia-Pacific where local manufacturers seek regional suppliers to avoid import bottlenecks. Emerging players focus on graphene and MXene membranes with anti-fouling coatings, aiming to displace incumbents in high value virus removal niches.
Pharmaceutical Membrane Filtration Industry Leaders
-
3M
-
Danaher Corporation
-
GE Healthcare
-
Thermo Fisher Scientific
-
Merck KGaA
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order

Recent Industry Developments
- February 2025: Thermo Fisher Scientific announced acquisition of Solventum's Purification & Filtration business for USD 4.1 billion, creating significant value through enhanced bioproduction capabilities and synergy realization across cell culture media and single-use technologies. This transaction strengthens Thermo Fisher's position in biologics production filtration while expanding their integrated bioprocessing portfolio.
- January 2025: FDA released draft guidance on complying with 21 CFR 211.110, emphasizing scientific and risk-based approaches to controlling manufacturing processes, particularly relevant for continuous manufacturing and 3D printing applications. The guidance encourages manufacturers to incorporate process models into control strategies for enhanced drug quality and availability.
- October 2024: Asahi Kasei Medical launched Planova FG1 next-generation virus removal filter with seven-fold higher flux compared to predecessor models, enhancing filtration speed while reducing virus breakthrough risk. The filter supports efficient biopharmaceutical production with compatibility across existing cleaning and sterilization processes.
- June 2024: Asahi Kasei launched membrane system for water for injection production utilizing Microza hollow-fiber membranes, achieving greater than 99.99% endotoxin removal rate while reducing energy consumption and CO2 emissions compared to traditional distillation methods. The system enables pharmaceutical manufacturers to transition toward more sustainable WFI production.
Global Pharmaceutical Membrane Filtration Market Report Scope
Membrane filtration process is a physical separation method characterized by the ability to separate molecules of different sizes and characteristics. Its driving force is the difference in pressure between the two sides of a special membrane.
In the report, a detailed analysis of the pharmaceutical membrane filtration market is provided. The market is evaluated by collating revenues generated across segments, categorized by Material, Technique, Application and Geography.
By Material | Polyethersulfone (PES) | ||
Polyvinylidene Difluoride (PVDF) | |||
Mixed Cellulose Ester & Cellulose Acetate (MCE & CA) | |||
Nylon | |||
Polypropylene & Others | |||
By Technique | Microfiltration | ||
Ultrafiltration | |||
Nanofiltration | |||
Reverse-Osmosis & Others | |||
By Process Stage | Final Product Sterile-filtration | ||
Bulk Drug Substance Clarification | |||
Cell Separation & Harvesting | |||
Water & Utility Filtration | |||
Air/Gas Filtration | |||
By Scale | Laboratory | ||
Pilot | |||
Commercial Production | |||
By Geography | North America | United States | |
Canada | |||
Mexico | |||
Europe | Germany | ||
United Kingdom | |||
France | |||
Italy | |||
Spain | |||
Rest of Europe | |||
Asia-Pacific | China | ||
Japan | |||
India | |||
Australia | |||
South Korea | |||
Rest of Asia-Pacific | |||
Middle East & Africa | GCC | ||
South Africa | |||
Rest of Middle East & Africa | |||
South America | Brazil | ||
Argentina | |||
Rest of South America |
Polyethersulfone (PES) |
Polyvinylidene Difluoride (PVDF) |
Mixed Cellulose Ester & Cellulose Acetate (MCE & CA) |
Nylon |
Polypropylene & Others |
Microfiltration |
Ultrafiltration |
Nanofiltration |
Reverse-Osmosis & Others |
Final Product Sterile-filtration |
Bulk Drug Substance Clarification |
Cell Separation & Harvesting |
Water & Utility Filtration |
Air/Gas Filtration |
Laboratory |
Pilot |
Commercial Production |
North America | United States |
Canada | |
Mexico | |
Europe | Germany |
United Kingdom | |
France | |
Italy | |
Spain | |
Rest of Europe | |
Asia-Pacific | China |
Japan | |
India | |
Australia | |
South Korea | |
Rest of Asia-Pacific | |
Middle East & Africa | GCC |
South Africa | |
Rest of Middle East & Africa | |
South America | Brazil |
Argentina | |
Rest of South America |
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is driving growth in the pharmaceutical membrane filtration market?
Demand for biologics, stringent viral clearance regulations, and the shift to single-use systems are the dominant growth catalysts that sustain a 9.55% CAGR through 2030.
Which material currently leads the pharmaceutical membrane filtration market?
Polyethersulfone holds 32.84% share because of its chemical stability, thermal resistance, and low protein binding.
Why is nanofiltration growing faster than other techniques?
Nanofiltration offers precise virus removal and selective small-molecule separation, driving a 12.95% CAGR as gene and cell therapies expand.
How do regulatory changes affect sterile filtration operations?
EU Annex 1 now mandates Pre-Use Post-Sterilization Integrity Testing, compelling manufacturers to deploy automated testers and enhanced leak detection.
Which region is expected to post the fastest growth?
Asia-Pacific stands out with an 11.67% CAGR due to large-scale facility build-outs and strong government support for biotechnology.