PFAS-Free Food Packaging Market Size and Share

PFAS-Free Food Packaging Market Summary
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

PFAS-Free Food Packaging Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The PFAS-free food packaging market size is valued at USD 42.62 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 59.18 billion by 2030, advancing at a 6.79% CAGR. Heightened regulatory scrutiny, corporate sustainability mandates, and rapidly evolving barrier-coating technologies are driving rapid shifts away from fluorinated chemistries toward safer materials across the global food value chain. Accelerated state and regional bans, as well as quick-service restaurant (QSR) procurement timelines, and breakthrough aqueous and bio-based coatings underpin demand momentum, even as cost premiums and performance gaps in extreme use cases temper short-term uptake. Competitive intensity is rising as incumbent fiber converters, chemical companies, and biopolymer innovators jockey for scale, intellectual property advantage, and preferred supplier status under multi-year packaging contracts in North America, Europe, and increasingly the Asia-Pacific, where molded-fiber capacity is scaling.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By packaging type, the wraps and liners segment captured 34.47% of the PFAS-Free Food Packaging Market revenue share in 2024.
  • By material type, the PFAS-Free Food Packaging Market size for bioplastics is projected to grow at an 8.59% CAGR between 2025–2030.
  • By end-user industry, the quick-service restaurants segment captured 41.47% of the PFAS-Free Food Packaging Market share in 2024.
  • By geography, the PFAS-Free Food Packaging Market size for Asia-Pacific is projected to grow at an 8.27% CAGR between 2025–2030.

Segment Analysis

By Packaging Type: functional wraps dominate volume while rigid containers fuel future growth

Wraps and liners accounted for 34.47% of the 2024 demand in the PFAS-free food packaging market, reflecting high-turnover items such as sandwich wraps, bakery sheets, and tray liners that achieve necessary functionality with cost-effective fiber substrates. The clamshells and hinged-container cohort is expanding at an 8.27% CAGR as aggregators, ghost kitchens, and platform-based delivery rely on grease-resistant molded fiber or coated paperboard to protect hot entrees during multi-stop journeys. 

Plates, bowls, and trays maintain steady institutional demand, while cups and lids prompt material scientists to develop multilayer bio-polymer films that can withstand steam and direct contact with 80 °C beverages. Bags and pouches remain a niche market in overall volume but are critical for fresh-produce aisles and frozen entrees that require low-temperature flex-crack performance.

PFAS-Free Food Packaging Market: Market Share by Packaging Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Material Type: paper and paperboard remain anchor materials while bioplastics accelerate

Paper-based substrates retained a 45.56% share during 2024. Pulp pricing stability and existing press equipment make fiber the default for operators pursuing rapid PFAS elimination. Meanwhile, bioplastics such as polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) and polylactic acid (PLA) composites are on an 8.59% CAGR trajectory, targeting cases where high barrier and clarity trump cost. 

Molded fiber is scaling through Asia-Pacific mega-plants that leverage lower labor inputs, ensuring cost competitiveness for food-service trays and bowls. Cellulose films cater to deli windows that require transparency, while wax-coated papers persist where bake-in performance offsets recyclability trade-offs, particularly in the pastry and confectionery segments.

By End-user Industry: QSR leadership extends retail momentum

The PFAS-free food packaging market saw QSRs account for 41.47% share in 2024, as global chains roll out corporate policies that specify sub-100 ppm total organic fluorine thresholds. Retail and supermarkets, while smaller, are outpacing growth at 8.67% CAGR as grocery merchandisers transition bakery boxes, meat trays, and salad bar containers to ensure compliance with impending local bans. 

Cafes and bakeries prefer visually appealing molded fiber or print-ready barrier papers to signal eco-commitment. Institutional catering, spanning corporate cafeterias to schools, balances cost pressures against tender requirements that increasingly reference PFAS-free criteria. Frozen-meal producers test high-temperature bio-coatings able to survive 700-W microwaving without delamination.

PFAS-Free Food Packaging Market: Market Share by End-user Industry
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

Geography Analysis

North America accounted for 36.73% of global revenue in 2024, driven by bans in California, New York, and Washington, as well as voluntary FDA phase-out guidance that prompted brand owners to align their supply across states. The PFAS-free food packaging market size in the region is forecast to expand steadily as smaller chains follow trend-setters and private-label grocery lines convert deli and bakery formats. Cross-border harmonization with Canadian toxic-substances legislation simplifies supplier logistics, while Mexican converters co-produce PFAS-free wraps for both domestic diners and U.S. franchises operating in the country.

The Asia-Pacific region is expected to show the fastest growth, with an 8.27% CAGR through 2030. Massive molded-fiber line installations in China, Malaysia, and Vietnam underpin export volume, narrowing delivered-cost gaps for U.S. and European buyers. Domestic opportunities are equally compelling; Southeast Asian food-delivery volumes surged, and governments are now drafting PFAS limits to curb landfill and wastewater contamination. Japan and South Korea adopt stricter chemical-safety laws, which naturally align with PFAS-free solutions, whereas India’s vibrant street-food scene and emerging QSR chains present a price-sensitive yet high-growth frontier.

Europe leverages a unified PPWR framework that standardizes PFAS caps, thereby creating predictable demand signals.[2]European Food Safety Authority, “Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS),” efsa.europa.eu Germany’s discounter giants and France’s fast-casual bakeries switched to water-based grease barriers early, driving volume for in-region mills. The United Kingdom follows similar rules post-Brexit, with its Environment Act powers accelerating PFAS phase-outs. Southern European nations like Italy and Spain, with robust fresh-produce export industries, increasingly require PFAS-free liners to retain EU market access, reinforcing conversion downstream in agricultural packaging operations.

PFAS-Free Food Packaging Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

Competition is moderate with a blend of multi-regional incumbents and agile specialists. Huhtamaki, Stora Enso, and Graphic Packaging are repositioning their paperboard mills toward water-based or protein-coated output lines to defend volumes. Specialty innovators such as Footprint and Billerud focus exclusively on PFAS-free architectures, commanding margins with IP-protected fiber forming and barrier chemistries. Chemical suppliers, notably Archroma, AkzoNobel, and Kemira, monetize licensing and resin sales by embedding their solutions into converter processes.

Strategic alliances form the backbone of technology deployment. Huhtamaki’s alliance with Xampla aims to rapidly industrialize plant-protein coating capabilities.[3]Huhtamaki, “Huhtamaki and Xampla Partner to Develop Innovative PFAS-Free Food Packaging,” huhtamaki.com Stora Enso plowed EUR 50 million (USD 55 million) into its Oulu mill upgrade to scale aqueous coating lines. Eastman Chemical aligned with Sealed Air to deliver bio-film variants through 2030, tapping Eastman’s molecular-recycling feedstock for lower-carbon inputs. Acquisition moves, such as Mondi’s 25% stake in traceless materials for EUR 12 million (USD 13.2 million), highlight a race for patented biopolymer capacity. Early-stage funding for Xampla and B’Zeos indicates a venture appetite for game-changing coatings and seaweed-based substrates.

Incumbents pursue global contracts with QSR groups to lock multi-year supply volumes and recover capital investments quickly. Certification to TÜV Rheinland total-organic-fluorine testing becomes a prerequisite for preferred-supplier lists, further professionalizing market entry. Margins stay pressured in commodity wraps yet ascend in high-barrier clamshells where performance parity meets brand risk mitigation.

PFAS-Free Food Packaging Industry Leaders

  1. Footprint LLC

  2. Stora Enso Oyj

  3. Smurfit WestRock plc

  4. Novolex Holdings

  5. UPM Specialty Papers

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
PFAS-Free Food Packaging Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • October 2024: Huhtamaki announced a strategic partnership with Xampla to develop protein-based barrier coatings for food packaging applications, targeting commercial deployment by 2026 across multiple packaging formats.
  • September 2024: Stora Enso completed a EUR 50 million (USD 55 million) investment in barrier-coating technology at its Oulu mill in Finland, expanding capacity by 40%.
  • August 2024: Eastman Chemical and Sealed Air Corporation formed a joint venture to develop bio-based barrier films for food packaging, aiming for USD 100 million in revenue by 2028.
  • July 2024: AkzoNobel launched its Interpon Terra coating system for food-contact metal packaging and rigid containers, after receiving FDA approval.

Table of Contents for PFAS-Free Food Packaging Industry Report

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Stricter global and state-level PFAS bans
    • 4.2.2 Major QSR chain PFAS-free procurement mandates
    • 4.2.3 Breakthrough aqueous/bio-based barrier coatings
    • 4.2.4 Scale-up of APAC molded-fiber capacity
    • 4.2.5 Total-Organic-Fluorine third-party certification uptake
    • 4.2.6 Corporate Scope-3 decarbonization targets
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 15-30% cost premium of PFAS-free options
    • 4.3.2 Performance gaps in high-humidity/hot-grease use
    • 4.3.3 Bio-barrier raw-material supply volatility
    • 4.3.4 Recycling-stream contamination risk
  • 4.4 Industry Supply Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.6 Technological Outlook
  • 4.7 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors
  • 4.8 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.8.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.8.3 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.8.5 Industry Rivalry

5. MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 5.1 By Packaging Type
    • 5.1.1 Wraps and Liners
    • 5.1.2 Clamshells and Hinged Containers
    • 5.1.3 Plates, Bowls and Trays
    • 5.1.4 Cups and Lids
    • 5.1.5 Bags and Pouches
    • 5.1.6 Other Packaging Types
  • 5.2 By Material Type
    • 5.2.1 Paper and Paperboard
    • 5.2.2 Molded Fiber/Pulp
    • 5.2.3 Bioplastics
    • 5.2.4 Cellulose Films
    • 5.2.5 Clay/Wax-Coated Paper
    • 5.2.6 Other Material Types
  • 5.3 By End-user Industry
    • 5.3.1 Quick-Service Restaurants
    • 5.3.2 Retail and Supermarkets
    • 5.3.3 Cafes and Bakeries
    • 5.3.4 Institutional Catering
    • 5.3.5 Frozen and Ready-Meal Producers
    • 5.3.6 Other End-User Industries
  • 5.4 By Geography
    • 5.4.1 North America
    • 5.4.1.1 United States
    • 5.4.1.2 Canada
    • 5.4.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.4.2 South America
    • 5.4.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.4.2.3 Chile
    • 5.4.2.4 Rest of South America
    • 5.4.3 Europe
    • 5.4.3.1 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.3.2 Germany
    • 5.4.3.3 France
    • 5.4.3.4 Italy
    • 5.4.3.5 Spain
    • 5.4.3.6 Russia
    • 5.4.3.7 Rest of Europe
    • 5.4.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.4.1 China
    • 5.4.4.2 India
    • 5.4.4.3 Japan
    • 5.4.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.4.4.5 Australia
    • 5.4.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.4.5.1 Middle East
    • 5.4.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.4.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.4.5.1.3 Turkey
    • 5.4.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.4.5.2 Africa
    • 5.4.5.2.1 South Africa
    • 5.4.5.2.2 Nigeria
    • 5.4.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Huhtamaki Oyj
    • 6.4.2 Footprint LLC
    • 6.4.3 Stora Enso Oyj
    • 6.4.4 Smurfit WestRock plc
    • 6.4.5 Ahlstrom Oyj
    • 6.4.6 Vegware Ltd
    • 6.4.7 Sabert Corporation
    • 6.4.8 Georgia-Pacific LLC
    • 6.4.9 UPM Specialty Papers
    • 6.4.10 Delfort Group
    • 6.4.11 Novolex Holdings
    • 6.4.12 Biopak Pty Ltd
    • 6.4.13 Genpak LLC
    • 6.4.14 Duni Group AB
    • 6.4.15 Metsä Board Oyj
    • 6.4.16 Detpak Pty Ltd
    • 6.4.17 Lecta Group
    • 6.4.18 Archroma Management LLC
    • 6.4.19 Guyenne Papier SAS
    • 6.4.20 Ahlstrom-Munksjö Performa
    • 6.4.21 Fibertech Packaging Inc.

7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Global PFAS-Free Food Packaging Market Report Scope

By Packaging Type
Wraps and Liners
Clamshells and Hinged Containers
Plates, Bowls and Trays
Cups and Lids
Bags and Pouches
Other Packaging Types
By Material Type
Paper and Paperboard
Molded Fiber/Pulp
Bioplastics
Cellulose Films
Clay/Wax-Coated Paper
Other Material Types
By End-user Industry
Quick-Service Restaurants
Retail and Supermarkets
Cafes and Bakeries
Institutional Catering
Frozen and Ready-Meal Producers
Other End-User Industries
By Geography
North America United States
Canada
Mexico
South America Brazil
Argentina
Chile
Rest of South America
Europe United Kingdom
Germany
France
Italy
Spain
Russia
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
India
Japan
South Korea
Australia
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa Middle East Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
Turkey
Rest of Middle East
Africa South Africa
Nigeria
Rest of Africa
By Packaging Type Wraps and Liners
Clamshells and Hinged Containers
Plates, Bowls and Trays
Cups and Lids
Bags and Pouches
Other Packaging Types
By Material Type Paper and Paperboard
Molded Fiber/Pulp
Bioplastics
Cellulose Films
Clay/Wax-Coated Paper
Other Material Types
By End-user Industry Quick-Service Restaurants
Retail and Supermarkets
Cafes and Bakeries
Institutional Catering
Frozen and Ready-Meal Producers
Other End-User Industries
By Geography North America United States
Canada
Mexico
South America Brazil
Argentina
Chile
Rest of South America
Europe United Kingdom
Germany
France
Italy
Spain
Russia
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
India
Japan
South Korea
Australia
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa Middle East Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
Turkey
Rest of Middle East
Africa South Africa
Nigeria
Rest of Africa
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What size is the PFAS-free food packaging market in 2025?

It is valued at USD 42.62 billion and is forecast to reach USD 59.18 billion by 2030.

Which region leads demand for PFAS-free food packaging?

North America holds 36.73% of 2024 global revenue, driven by early bans and QSR mandates.

Which end-user category is growing fastest?

Retail and supermarkets are expanding at an 8.67% CAGR through 2030 as grocery chains phase out PFAS.

Why are PFAS-free options still more expensive?

Specialty resins, modified machinery, and lower volumes create a 15-30% cost premium until scale economies improve.

Which material segment shows the highest future growth?

Bioplastics are projected to grow at an 8.59% CAGR due to improved barrier performance and compostability.

What performance gaps remain for PFAS-free solutions?

Current coatings underperform in hot-grease, high-humidity uses, reaching only about 70-85% of legacy PFAS resistance.

Page last updated on: