Multiple Myeloma Market Size and Share

Multiple Myeloma Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Multiple Myeloma Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Multiple Myeloma Market size is estimated at USD 24.12 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 35.52 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 8.05% during the forecast period (2025-2030).

Innovative immunotherapies, bispecific antibodies, and CAR-T cell products are displacing legacy small molecules, keeping overall growth strong despite the Revlimid patent cliff. North American payers continue to accept premium pricing when therapies show durable response and overall-survival gains, while Asia-Pacific’s rapid incidence growth and regulatory modernization position the region for outsized expansion. Manufacturers are moving toward outpatient-friendly formulations and precision approaches that match a therapy’s mechanism to a patient’s genetic risk profile. Competitive intensity stays high as leading companies defend their portfolios through lifecycle management and acquisitions of next-generation assets, even as emerging entrants focus on manufacturing efficiency and resistance mechanisms.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By drug class, immunomodulators led with 39.32% revenue share in 2024, whereas cell therapy is projected to expand at a 10.37% CAGR through 2030. 
  • By mode of administration, oral delivery held 45.29% of the multiple myeloma market share in 2024, while subcutaneous delivery is expected to grow at 11.42% CAGR to 2030. 
  • By line of therapy, second-line regimens accounted for 39.65% of the multiple myeloma market size in 2024, yet third-line and later lines are forecast to advance at 12.07% CAGR between 2025-2030. 
  • By distribution channel, hospital pharmacies retained a 57.19% share in 2024; specialty and online pharmacies are set to rise at 13.23% CAGR through 2030. 
  • By geography, North America dominated with a 39.41% share in 2024, whereas Asia-Pacific is poised for the fastest 13.89% CAGR to 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Drug Class: Cell Therapy Expands the Treatment Frontier

Immunomodulators captured 39.32% of the multiple myeloma market size in 2024, reflecting their entrenched role in first- and second-line regimens. Yet cell therapy’s 10.37% CAGR signifies the fastest gain, propelled by CAR-T agents that deliver complete-response rates exceeding 60%. The multiple myeloma market share held by immunomodulators is expected to thin gradually as bispecific antibodies and next-generation CELMoDs migrate into earlier lines. Combination strategies that pair proteasome inhibitors with antibody-drug conjugates preserve relevance for traditional classes, whereas histone deacetylase inhibitors remain niche options for defined genetic subtypes. 

Continuous pipeline activity ensures a diverse therapeutic toolkit that clinicians tailor to cytogenetics, comorbidities, and prior exposure. Superior minimal-residual disease negativity achieved with cell therapies signals a shift toward fixed-duration treatment, creating a new pricing and reimbursement paradigm focused on one-time interventions. Manufacturers bridge the gap between expensive autologous products and off-the-shelf allogeneic constructs, aiming to balance scalability with durable efficacy. As resistance mechanisms evolve, AI-assisted degrader discovery feeds a future wave of targeted modalities that promise deeper responses with manageable toxicity.

Market Share by Drug Class
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Mode of Administration: Subcutaneous Delivery Gains Momentum

Oral regimens accounted for 45.29% of revenue in 2024 because physicians prefer outpatient convenience for maintenance therapy. Subcutaneous formulations, though smaller in absolute sales, will outpace all other modes with an 11.42% CAGR through 2030. The trend stems from patients desire for shorter chair time and lower infusion reactions, as proven by daratumumab faspro studies showing reduced grade 2 reactions. 

Subcutaneous options lower nursing burden and enable community-based administration, expanding reach to rural populations. Intravenous infusions remain essential for newly approved assets needing close monitoring, but on-body pumps are blurring the line by allowing home-based continuous delivery. Manufacturers incorporate hyaluronidase technology to increase bioavailability, while payers consider site-of-care differentials in reimbursement. Investment in patient self-injection education and remote adverse-event reporting infrastructure makes the transition smoother for elderly cohorts with limited mobility.

By Line of Therapy: Later Lines See Robust Uptake of Novel Mechanisms

Second-line treatments held 39.65% of spend in 2024, yet third-line and beyond are forecast for a 12.07% CAGR as bispecific antibodies and CAR-T therapies move downstream. Physicians reserve high-cost modalities for refractory disease after proteasome inhibitor and anti-CD38 failure, reflecting guideline evolution. Early data from the PERSEUS trial suggest quadruplet regimens could shift the standard of care, potentially compressing the pool of relapsed patients but demanding even more potent options at each successive relapse. 

Treatment sequencing becomes a strategic decision balancing maximal upfront depth against preserving later-line efficacy. Real-time sequencing algorithms that incorporate minimal-residual disease and genomic profiles support case-by-case customization. As later-line therapies prove curative for selected subgroups, survivorship care transitions from continuous therapy to periodic monitoring.

Market Share by Line of Therapy
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Distribution Channel: Specialty Pharmacies Provide Integrated Support

Hospital pharmacies maintained 57.19% of revenue in 2024 because high-complexity regimens require sterile compounding and inpatient observation. Specialty and online pharmacies, projected to grow at 13.23% CAGR, handle benefits navigation, adherence monitoring, and cold-chain logistics that conventional retail outlets lack. Integrated digital platforms allow real-time refill reminders and symptom tracking, reducing hospital readmissions and enhancing patient satisfaction. 

Health systems increasingly outsource dispensing of oral oncolytics to specialty channels to alleviate inpatient pharmacy congestion. Mail-order options appeal to patients in remote areas, while click-and-collect models improve last-mile delivery reliability. Harmonized accreditation standards assure quality across geographies and support expanded payer acceptance.

Geography Analysis

North America commanded 39.41% of global revenue in 2024 owing to early adoption of innovative therapies, comprehensive insurance coverage, and dense networks of academic centers that lead pivotal trials. FDA priority-review programs shorten the approval window, allowing manufacturers to recognize revenue quickly after positive phase III readouts. Financial toxicity remains a policy discussion, but value-based agreements and outcomes-linked reimbursement keep uptake steady. Providers also integrate artificial-intelligence tools for genomic risk stratification and minimal-residual disease tracking, reinforcing the region’s leadership in precision care.

Asia-Pacific posts the fastest 13.89% CAGR through 2030, driven by demographic aging, rising disease awareness, and government initiatives that broaden oncology insurance coverage. China’s NRDL inclusions and Japan’s premium pricing for breakthrough designation shrink the gap between initial global launch and local availability. The region doubles as a manufacturing hub for viral vectors, lowering supply-chain risk and cost of goods. Cultural preferences for oral therapy and home-based care dovetail with subcutaneous and oral pipeline assets. Strategic partnerships between multinationals and domestic biotech firms accelerate technology transfer and bolster clinical-trial enrollment, amplifying real-world evidence generation.

Europe maintains a substantial share on the strength of centralized approval via the European Medicines Agency and robust public-purchasing power. Yet budget caps place mounting pressure on ultra-high-cost cell therapies, prompting risk-sharing models and staged payments. Country-specific health-technology assessments demand mature overall-survival data, occasionally delaying reimbursement relative to North America. Regional heterogeneity in infusion-center capacity influences uptake rates, with Northern Europe adopting CAR-T faster than Southern states.

Middle East & Africa and South America collectively represent early-stage opportunities characterized by unmet medical need and infrastructure constraints. Multilateral partnerships support the establishment of centers of excellence, and tiered-pricing frameworks aim to balance affordability with sustainable returns. Local clinical trial participation grows, enabling earlier access and generating evidence tailored to genetic diversity. Over time, stepped-care pathways and biosimilar entry will expand treatment penetration beyond wealthy urban populations.

Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

Bristol Myers Squibb and Johnson & Johnson anchor the field with broad portfolios spanning immunomodulators, antibodies, and cell therapies. Bristol Myers Squibb fortifies leadership by advancing CELMoDs iberdomide and mezigdomide while scaling Abecma manufacturing capacity to meet demand for earlier-line CAR-T applications. Johnson & Johnson leverages the Darzalex franchise, which generated USD 9.7 billion in 2023, and builds global supply for Carvykti to ensure consistent leukapheresis slots. Both players deploy real-world evidence registries to support favorable payer decisions and fend off biosimilar erosion.

Emerging biotechs seize white-space niches by targeting resistance drivers such as GPRC5D and Fc receptor polymorphisms. AbbVie’s USD 1.05 billion alliance with Simcere Zaiming for trispecific antibody SIM0500 exemplifies this strategy, marrying novel antigen coverage with China-based manufacturing economies. Mid-cap companies innovate in manufacturing efficiency, adopting closed-system bioreactors and modular viral-vector plants that shorten production cycles. Academic-industry collaborations accelerate bench-to-bedside translation of new immune-engagers, supported by venture financing eager for differentiated mechanisms.

Pricing pressure spurs competition beyond molecule differentiation toward service offerings such as value-based contracting, digital adherence tools, and patient navigation services. Companies with vertically integrated cell-therapy capabilities enjoy scale advantages, while those lacking in-house manufacturing forge strategic CDMO relationships to secure capacity. As intellectual-property cliffs loom for early monoclonal antibodies, lifecycle-management tactics include subcutaneous reformulations and fixed-duration regimens that refresh clinical utility.

Multiple Myeloma Industry Leaders

  1. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company

  2. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited

  3. Amgen Inc.

  4. Sanofi S.A.

  5. Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Multiple Myeloma Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • January 2025: AbbVie announced a strategic partnership with Simcere Zaiming to develop SIM0500, a novel trispecific antibody candidate targeting GPRC5D, BCMA, and CD3 for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, with potential milestone payments totaling USD 1.055 billion plus tiered royalties. This collaboration represents one of the largest deals in multiple myeloma drug development and validates the strategic importance of multi-target approaches for overcoming treatment resistance.
  • November 2024: GSK announced FDA acceptance for review of Blenrep (belantamab mafodotin) combination therapies with bortezomib plus dexamethasone and pomalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, with a target decision date of July 23, 2025. The submission is supported by phase III DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 trials demonstrating significant improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival.
  • October 2024: Merck completed the acquisition of CN201, an investigational B-cell depletion therapy from Curon Biopharmaceutical, expanding its oncology pipeline with a potentially differentiated mechanism for multiple myeloma treatment. The acquisition demonstrates continued industry consolidation around novel therapeutic approaches that address unmet medical needs in hematologic malignancies.
  • September 2024: Sanofi received FDA approval for isatuximab (Sarclisa) in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients ineligible for transplant, marking the first anti-CD38 therapy approved in this indication. The approval expands treatment options for a significant patient population and strengthens Sanofi's position in the competitive multiple myeloma market.

Table of Contents for Multiple Myeloma Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Growing Burden of Multiple Myeloma Worldwide
    • 4.2.2 Rising Geriatric Population & Plasma-Cell Cancer Risk
    • 4.2.3 Accelerated Approvals & Orphan-Drug Incentives
    • 4.2.4 Patent-cliff of Revlimid Driving Low Cost Generics
    • 4.2.5 Clinical Success of Bispecifics & CAR-T Expanding Eligible Pool
    • 4.2.6 AI-designed CELMoDs Enabling Next-Gen Targeted Degradation
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Escalating Therapy Costs & Payer Pushback
    • 4.3.2 Cell-therapy Manufacturing Capacity Bottlenecks
    • 4.3.3 Genomic Heterogeneity Causing Rapid Resistance
    • 4.3.4 Supply Chain Risks for Viral Vectors & Plasmids
  • 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.5 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.5.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.5.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.5.4 Threat of Substitute Products
    • 4.5.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value in USD)

  • 5.1 By Drug Class
    • 5.1.1 Immunomodulators
    • 5.1.2 Proteasome Inhibitors
    • 5.1.3 Monoclonal Antibodies
    • 5.1.4 Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
    • 5.1.5 Cell Therapy
    • 5.1.6 Bispecific Antibodies
    • 5.1.7 Antibody-Drug Conjugates
    • 5.1.8 Other Drug Classes
  • 5.2 By Mode of Administration
    • 5.2.1 Oral
    • 5.2.2 Intravenous
    • 5.2.3 Subcutaneous
  • 5.3 By Line of Therapy
    • 5.3.1 First-line
    • 5.3.2 Second-line
    • 5.3.3 Third-line & Beyond
  • 5.4 By Distribution Channel
    • 5.4.1 Hospital Pharmacies
    • 5.4.2 Retail Pharmacies
    • 5.4.3 Specialty & Online Pharmacies
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 Germany
    • 5.5.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.3 France
    • 5.5.2.4 Italy
    • 5.5.2.5 Spain
    • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 Japan
    • 5.5.3.3 India
    • 5.5.3.4 Australia
    • 5.5.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 Middle East & Africa
    • 5.5.4.1 GCC
    • 5.5.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • 5.5.5 South America
    • 5.5.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Bristol-Myers Squibb
    • 6.3.2 Johnson & Johnson
    • 6.3.3 Takeda Pharmaceutical
    • 6.3.4 Amgen
    • 6.3.5 Sanofi
    • 6.3.6 Karyopharm Therapeutics
    • 6.3.7 Ono Pharmaceutical
    • 6.3.8 AbbVie
    • 6.3.9 GlaxoSmithKline
    • 6.3.10 Novartis
    • 6.3.11 Teva Pharmaceutical
    • 6.3.12 Legend Biotech
    • 6.3.13 Bluebird bio
    • 6.3.14 Genmab
    • 6.3.15 Seagen
    • 6.3.16 Regeneron
    • 6.3.17 Pfizer
    • 6.3.18 BeiGene
    • 6.3.19 Oncopeptides AB
    • 6.3.20 Exelixis

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Mordor Intelligence defines the multiple myeloma market as the worldwide sales value of prescription therapeutics, immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, cell and gene-based products, bispecifics, and other approved drug classes used at any line of therapy for active or smoldering disease.

Scope exclusion: diagnostics, minimal residual disease test kits, and supportive drugs such as bisphosphonates are outside this study.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Drug Class
    • Immunomodulators
    • Proteasome Inhibitors
    • Monoclonal Antibodies
    • Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
    • Cell Therapy
    • Bispecific Antibodies
    • Antibody-Drug Conjugates
    • Other Drug Classes
  • By Mode of Administration
    • Oral
    • Intravenous
    • Subcutaneous
  • By Line of Therapy
    • First-line
    • Second-line
    • Third-line & Beyond
  • By Distribution Channel
    • Hospital Pharmacies
    • Retail Pharmacies
    • Specialty & Online Pharmacies
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • Australia
      • South Korea
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East & Africa
      • GCC
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Subsequently, we interview hematologists, oncology pharmacists, payers, and CRO executives across North America, Europe, and key Asian markets. These discussions validate prevalence curves, average course durations, emerging price concessions, and pipeline launch timing, letting us fine-tune model assumptions that literature alone cannot settle.

Desk Research

Our analysts start with public datasets that anchor patient incidence, treatment uptake, and pricing: cancer registries (SEER, GLOBOCAN), pharmaceutical trade filings, national drug price compendia, clinical trial registries, and association white papers such as the International Myeloma Society annual abstracts. Company 10-Ks and investor decks reveal SKU-level sales patterns, while curated paid feeds, D&B Hoovers for company revenue splits and Dow Jones Factiva for regulatory news, supply continual updates.

Epidemiology meta-analyses, hospital discharge statistics, and customs export tallies on finished oncology injectables further frame regional volume flows. The sources listed illustrate our wider desk research net; many more outlets are consulted for cross-checks and clarification.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

We anchor 2025 revenue using a top-down prevalence-to-treated-patient build, multiplied by mean annual therapy cost. Bottom-up spot checks, sample hospital pharmacy purchases and manufacturer disclosures, calibrate average selling prices and line-of-therapy splits. Key variables include diagnosed incidence, adoption lag of novel biologics, generic lenalidomide erosion, CAR-T capacity expansion, and payer reimbursement ceilings. Multivariate regression projects each driver, while scenario analysis tests high-price and rapid uptake cases before the composite CAGR is locked.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs run through automated variance flags, peer review, and a senior analyst sign-off. The dataset refreshes annually, with interim revisions triggered by label expansions, major guideline changes, or pricing shocks; a last-mile check occurs just before each publication.

Why Mordor's Multiple Myeloma Baseline Earns Trust

Published estimates often differ because firms vary treatment lists, geographic reach, currency year, and refresh cadence.

Key gap drivers include whether bispecific antibodies and CAR-T launches are fully counted, how quickly generic erosion is modeled, and if hospital discounting is applied. External publishers currently quote 2024 values between USD 27.75 billion and USD 28.42 billion, yet some exclude emerging cell therapies or apply flat pricing to 2030, explaining narrower growth.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 24.12 Bn (2025) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 27.75 Bn (2024) Global Consultancy A Omits third-line CAR-T uptake; uses static ASP
USD 28.42 Bn (2024) Trade Journal B Counts supportive drugs; limited country set

These comparisons show that our stepwise scope selection, dual-path modeling, and yearly refresh yield a balanced, reproducible baseline clients can rely on.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current size of the multiple myeloma market?

The multiple myeloma market generated USD 24.12 billion in 2025, with projections pointing to USD 25.52 billion by 2030.

Which therapy class is growing fastest?

Cell therapy is the fastest-growing class, advancing at a 10.37% CAGR through 2030 due to strong efficacy and potential single-dose cures.

Why is Asia-Pacific experiencing the highest growth rate?

Aging demographics, broader insurance coverage, and accelerated regulatory approvals drive a 13.89% CAGR for Asia-Pacific between 2025-2030.

How are payers addressing high treatment costs?

Payers increasingly require value-based contracts and real-world evidence, linking payment to durable response and quality-of-life improvements.

What are the main manufacturing challenges for CAR-T therapies?

Limited viral-vector capacity and complex autologous production processes extend lead times and elevate costs, constraining near-term supply.

Which distribution channel is gaining share most rapidly?

Specialty and online pharmacies are expanding at a 13.23% CAGR as they provide integrated support services needed for complex regimens.

Page last updated on:

Multiple Myeloma Market Report Snapshots