Multiple Myeloma Market Size and Share
Multiple Myeloma Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Multiple Myeloma Market size is estimated at USD 24.12 billion in 2025, and is expected to reach USD 35.52 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 8.05% during the forecast period (2025-2030).
Innovative immunotherapies, bispecific antibodies, and CAR-T cell products are displacing legacy small molecules, keeping overall growth strong despite the Revlimid patent cliff. North American payers continue to accept premium pricing when therapies show durable response and overall-survival gains, while Asia-Pacific’s rapid incidence growth and regulatory modernization position the region for outsized expansion. Manufacturers are moving toward outpatient-friendly formulations and precision approaches that match a therapy’s mechanism to a patient’s genetic risk profile. Competitive intensity stays high as leading companies defend their portfolios through lifecycle management and acquisitions of next-generation assets, even as emerging entrants focus on manufacturing efficiency and resistance mechanisms.
Key Report Takeaways
- By drug class, immunomodulators led with 39.32% revenue share in 2024, whereas cell therapy is projected to expand at a 10.37% CAGR through 2030.
- By mode of administration, oral delivery held 45.29% of the multiple myeloma market share in 2024, while subcutaneous delivery is expected to grow at 11.42% CAGR to 2030.
- By line of therapy, second-line regimens accounted for 39.65% of the multiple myeloma market size in 2024, yet third-line and later lines are forecast to advance at 12.07% CAGR between 2025-2030.
- By distribution channel, hospital pharmacies retained a 57.19% share in 2024; specialty and online pharmacies are set to rise at 13.23% CAGR through 2030.
- By geography, North America dominated with a 39.41% share in 2024, whereas Asia-Pacific is poised for the fastest 13.89% CAGR to 2030.
Global Multiple Myeloma Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growing Burden of Multiple Myeloma Worldwide | +1.8% | Global, with highest impact in North America & Europe | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Rising Geriatric Population & Plasma-Cell Cancer Risk | +1.5% | Global, concentrated in developed markets | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Accelerated Approvals & Orphan-Drug Incentives | +2.1% | North America & EU primary, expanding to Asia-Pacific | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Patent-cliff of Revlimid Driving Low Cost Generics | +0.9% | Global, with immediate impact in developed markets | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Clinical Success of Bispecifics & CAR-T Expanding Eligible Pool | +1.2% | North America & Europe leading, Asia-Pacific emerging | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| AI-designed CELMoDs Enabling Next-Gen Targeted Degradation | +0.7% | Global, with early adoption in advanced markets | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Growing Burden of Multiple Myeloma Worldwide
Annual diagnoses continue rising, with roughly 292,000 new cases expected between 2022 and 2040. Higher incidence drives sustained demand for novel modalities that promise deeper and more durable responses.[1]Bristol Myers Squibb, “Global Multiple Myeloma Epidemiology Data,” bms.com The disease exerts a disproportionate impact on African American communities, encouraging culturally tailored care models. As patient expectations shift toward functional cures, makers of cell and gene therapies see more substantial uptake, and health systems allocate larger oncology budgets to therapies that demonstrate prolonged minimal-residual disease negativity. Epidemiological pressure also accelerates investment in early-diagnosis technologies aimed at smoldering myeloma.
Rising Geriatric Population & Plasma-Cell Cancer Risk
Most diagnoses occur in patients aged 65 or older, coinciding with peak use of healthcare services. Age-related frailty elevates the value of subcutaneous and oral options that reduce clinic visits and infusion-related reactions. Formulators emphasize tolerability and simplified dosing schedules, enabling elderly patients to adhere to multiyear maintenance regimens. The trend stimulates innovation in remote monitoring tools that track hematologic toxicity and real-time response, further supporting home-based care models.
Accelerated Approvals & Orphan-Drug Incentives
Regulators increasingly endorse expedited pathways; the Food and Drug Administration granted fast-track status to trispecific antibody ISB 2001 in 2024.[2]Food and Drug Administration, “Oncology (Cancer) / Hematologic Malignancies Approval Notifications,” fda.gov Such designations shorten development cycles and extend exclusivity periods, improving return on R&D and driving a continuous pipeline of first-in-class assets. Companies with deep regulatory expertise leverage these programs to front-load commercialization, while health systems benefit from earlier access to breakthrough treatments that meet unmet needs.
Patent-Cliff of Revlimid Driving Low-Cost Generics
Generic entry accelerated after lenalidomide exclusivity lapsed. Although lower prices deliver near-term payer savings, the shift pushes innovators toward next-generation CELMoDs such as iberdomide that promise stronger degradation of Ikaros and Aiolos transcription factors. The resulting portfolio refresh offsets revenue erosion and raises the performance bar for future immunomodulators.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Escalating therapy costs & payer pushback | -1.2% | Global, most acute in price-sensitive markets | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Cell-therapy manufacturing bottlenecks | -0.8% | Global, regions lacking manufacturing capacity | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Genomic heterogeneity causing resistance | -0.6% | Global, especially relapsed/refractory cohorts | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Supply-chain risks for viral vectors | -0.4% | Global, acute in emerging markets | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Escalating Therapy Costs & Payer Pushback
Commercial CAR-T courses range from USD 373,000 to USD 475,000 per patient. Health plans now require real-world evidence on survival and post-treatment quality of life before granting broad coverage.[3]Cell & Gene Media, “CAR-T Manufacturing Challenges in Hematologic Cancers,” cellandgene.com Contracts increasingly link payment to biomarkers or milestone response criteria. Manufacturers that can demonstrate superior cost-effectiveness gain faster formulary inclusion, while those lacking robust data face restricted indication or step-therapy mandates.
Cell-Therapy Manufacturing Capacity Bottlenecks
The limited global supply of lentiviral vectors and specialized clean rooms caps treatment volume. Lead times stretch beyond six months in peak demand periods, delaying patient access and depressing revenue capture. Strategic vertical integration and modular manufacturing units promise relief, but scale-up remains complex because every batch is autologous and must meet stringent sterility standards.
Segment Analysis
By Drug Class: Cell Therapy Expands the Treatment Frontier
Immunomodulators captured 39.32% of the multiple myeloma market size in 2024, reflecting their entrenched role in first- and second-line regimens. Yet cell therapy’s 10.37% CAGR signifies the fastest gain, propelled by CAR-T agents that deliver complete-response rates exceeding 60%. The multiple myeloma market share held by immunomodulators is expected to thin gradually as bispecific antibodies and next-generation CELMoDs migrate into earlier lines. Combination strategies that pair proteasome inhibitors with antibody-drug conjugates preserve relevance for traditional classes, whereas histone deacetylase inhibitors remain niche options for defined genetic subtypes.
Continuous pipeline activity ensures a diverse therapeutic toolkit that clinicians tailor to cytogenetics, comorbidities, and prior exposure. Superior minimal-residual disease negativity achieved with cell therapies signals a shift toward fixed-duration treatment, creating a new pricing and reimbursement paradigm focused on one-time interventions. Manufacturers bridge the gap between expensive autologous products and off-the-shelf allogeneic constructs, aiming to balance scalability with durable efficacy. As resistance mechanisms evolve, AI-assisted degrader discovery feeds a future wave of targeted modalities that promise deeper responses with manageable toxicity.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Mode of Administration: Subcutaneous Delivery Gains Momentum
Oral regimens accounted for 45.29% of revenue in 2024 because physicians prefer outpatient convenience for maintenance therapy. Subcutaneous formulations, though smaller in absolute sales, will outpace all other modes with an 11.42% CAGR through 2030. The trend stems from patients desire for shorter chair time and lower infusion reactions, as proven by daratumumab faspro studies showing reduced grade 2 reactions.
Subcutaneous options lower nursing burden and enable community-based administration, expanding reach to rural populations. Intravenous infusions remain essential for newly approved assets needing close monitoring, but on-body pumps are blurring the line by allowing home-based continuous delivery. Manufacturers incorporate hyaluronidase technology to increase bioavailability, while payers consider site-of-care differentials in reimbursement. Investment in patient self-injection education and remote adverse-event reporting infrastructure makes the transition smoother for elderly cohorts with limited mobility.
By Line of Therapy: Later Lines See Robust Uptake of Novel Mechanisms
Second-line treatments held 39.65% of spend in 2024, yet third-line and beyond are forecast for a 12.07% CAGR as bispecific antibodies and CAR-T therapies move downstream. Physicians reserve high-cost modalities for refractory disease after proteasome inhibitor and anti-CD38 failure, reflecting guideline evolution. Early data from the PERSEUS trial suggest quadruplet regimens could shift the standard of care, potentially compressing the pool of relapsed patients but demanding even more potent options at each successive relapse.
Treatment sequencing becomes a strategic decision balancing maximal upfront depth against preserving later-line efficacy. Real-time sequencing algorithms that incorporate minimal-residual disease and genomic profiles support case-by-case customization. As later-line therapies prove curative for selected subgroups, survivorship care transitions from continuous therapy to periodic monitoring.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Distribution Channel: Specialty Pharmacies Provide Integrated Support
Hospital pharmacies maintained 57.19% of revenue in 2024 because high-complexity regimens require sterile compounding and inpatient observation. Specialty and online pharmacies, projected to grow at 13.23% CAGR, handle benefits navigation, adherence monitoring, and cold-chain logistics that conventional retail outlets lack. Integrated digital platforms allow real-time refill reminders and symptom tracking, reducing hospital readmissions and enhancing patient satisfaction.
Health systems increasingly outsource dispensing of oral oncolytics to specialty channels to alleviate inpatient pharmacy congestion. Mail-order options appeal to patients in remote areas, while click-and-collect models improve last-mile delivery reliability. Harmonized accreditation standards assure quality across geographies and support expanded payer acceptance.
Geography Analysis
North America commanded 39.41% of global revenue in 2024 owing to early adoption of innovative therapies, comprehensive insurance coverage, and dense networks of academic centers that lead pivotal trials. FDA priority-review programs shorten the approval window, allowing manufacturers to recognize revenue quickly after positive phase III readouts. Financial toxicity remains a policy discussion, but value-based agreements and outcomes-linked reimbursement keep uptake steady. Providers also integrate artificial-intelligence tools for genomic risk stratification and minimal-residual disease tracking, reinforcing the region’s leadership in precision care.
Asia-Pacific posts the fastest 13.89% CAGR through 2030, driven by demographic aging, rising disease awareness, and government initiatives that broaden oncology insurance coverage. China’s NRDL inclusions and Japan’s premium pricing for breakthrough designation shrink the gap between initial global launch and local availability. The region doubles as a manufacturing hub for viral vectors, lowering supply-chain risk and cost of goods. Cultural preferences for oral therapy and home-based care dovetail with subcutaneous and oral pipeline assets. Strategic partnerships between multinationals and domestic biotech firms accelerate technology transfer and bolster clinical-trial enrollment, amplifying real-world evidence generation.
Europe maintains a substantial share on the strength of centralized approval via the European Medicines Agency and robust public-purchasing power. Yet budget caps place mounting pressure on ultra-high-cost cell therapies, prompting risk-sharing models and staged payments. Country-specific health-technology assessments demand mature overall-survival data, occasionally delaying reimbursement relative to North America. Regional heterogeneity in infusion-center capacity influences uptake rates, with Northern Europe adopting CAR-T faster than Southern states.
Middle East & Africa and South America collectively represent early-stage opportunities characterized by unmet medical need and infrastructure constraints. Multilateral partnerships support the establishment of centers of excellence, and tiered-pricing frameworks aim to balance affordability with sustainable returns. Local clinical trial participation grows, enabling earlier access and generating evidence tailored to genetic diversity. Over time, stepped-care pathways and biosimilar entry will expand treatment penetration beyond wealthy urban populations.
Competitive Landscape
Bristol Myers Squibb and Johnson & Johnson anchor the field with broad portfolios spanning immunomodulators, antibodies, and cell therapies. Bristol Myers Squibb fortifies leadership by advancing CELMoDs iberdomide and mezigdomide while scaling Abecma manufacturing capacity to meet demand for earlier-line CAR-T applications. Johnson & Johnson leverages the Darzalex franchise, which generated USD 9.7 billion in 2023, and builds global supply for Carvykti to ensure consistent leukapheresis slots. Both players deploy real-world evidence registries to support favorable payer decisions and fend off biosimilar erosion.
Emerging biotechs seize white-space niches by targeting resistance drivers such as GPRC5D and Fc receptor polymorphisms. AbbVie’s USD 1.05 billion alliance with Simcere Zaiming for trispecific antibody SIM0500 exemplifies this strategy, marrying novel antigen coverage with China-based manufacturing economies. Mid-cap companies innovate in manufacturing efficiency, adopting closed-system bioreactors and modular viral-vector plants that shorten production cycles. Academic-industry collaborations accelerate bench-to-bedside translation of new immune-engagers, supported by venture financing eager for differentiated mechanisms.
Pricing pressure spurs competition beyond molecule differentiation toward service offerings such as value-based contracting, digital adherence tools, and patient navigation services. Companies with vertically integrated cell-therapy capabilities enjoy scale advantages, while those lacking in-house manufacturing forge strategic CDMO relationships to secure capacity. As intellectual-property cliffs loom for early monoclonal antibodies, lifecycle-management tactics include subcutaneous reformulations and fixed-duration regimens that refresh clinical utility.
Multiple Myeloma Industry Leaders
-
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
-
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
-
Amgen Inc.
-
Sanofi S.A.
-
Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc.
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- January 2025: AbbVie announced a strategic partnership with Simcere Zaiming to develop SIM0500, a novel trispecific antibody candidate targeting GPRC5D, BCMA, and CD3 for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, with potential milestone payments totaling USD 1.055 billion plus tiered royalties. This collaboration represents one of the largest deals in multiple myeloma drug development and validates the strategic importance of multi-target approaches for overcoming treatment resistance.
- November 2024: GSK announced FDA acceptance for review of Blenrep (belantamab mafodotin) combination therapies with bortezomib plus dexamethasone and pomalidomide plus dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, with a target decision date of July 23, 2025. The submission is supported by phase III DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 trials demonstrating significant improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival.
- October 2024: Merck completed the acquisition of CN201, an investigational B-cell depletion therapy from Curon Biopharmaceutical, expanding its oncology pipeline with a potentially differentiated mechanism for multiple myeloma treatment. The acquisition demonstrates continued industry consolidation around novel therapeutic approaches that address unmet medical needs in hematologic malignancies.
- September 2024: Sanofi received FDA approval for isatuximab (Sarclisa) in combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients ineligible for transplant, marking the first anti-CD38 therapy approved in this indication. The approval expands treatment options for a significant patient population and strengthens Sanofi's position in the competitive multiple myeloma market.
Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope
Market Definitions and Key Coverage
Mordor Intelligence defines the multiple myeloma market as the worldwide sales value of prescription therapeutics, immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, cell and gene-based products, bispecifics, and other approved drug classes used at any line of therapy for active or smoldering disease.
Scope exclusion: diagnostics, minimal residual disease test kits, and supportive drugs such as bisphosphonates are outside this study.
Segmentation Overview
- By Drug Class
- Immunomodulators
- Proteasome Inhibitors
- Monoclonal Antibodies
- Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors
- Cell Therapy
- Bispecific Antibodies
- Antibody-Drug Conjugates
- Other Drug Classes
- By Mode of Administration
- Oral
- Intravenous
- Subcutaneous
- By Line of Therapy
- First-line
- Second-line
- Third-line & Beyond
- By Distribution Channel
- Hospital Pharmacies
- Retail Pharmacies
- Specialty & Online Pharmacies
- By Geography
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Mexico
- Europe
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- France
- Italy
- Spain
- Rest of Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- China
- Japan
- India
- Australia
- South Korea
- Rest of Asia-Pacific
- Middle East & Africa
- GCC
- South Africa
- Rest of Middle East & Africa
- South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of South America
- North America
Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation
Primary Research
Subsequently, we interview hematologists, oncology pharmacists, payers, and CRO executives across North America, Europe, and key Asian markets. These discussions validate prevalence curves, average course durations, emerging price concessions, and pipeline launch timing, letting us fine-tune model assumptions that literature alone cannot settle.
Desk Research
Our analysts start with public datasets that anchor patient incidence, treatment uptake, and pricing: cancer registries (SEER, GLOBOCAN), pharmaceutical trade filings, national drug price compendia, clinical trial registries, and association white papers such as the International Myeloma Society annual abstracts. Company 10-Ks and investor decks reveal SKU-level sales patterns, while curated paid feeds, D&B Hoovers for company revenue splits and Dow Jones Factiva for regulatory news, supply continual updates.
Epidemiology meta-analyses, hospital discharge statistics, and customs export tallies on finished oncology injectables further frame regional volume flows. The sources listed illustrate our wider desk research net; many more outlets are consulted for cross-checks and clarification.
Market-Sizing & Forecasting
We anchor 2025 revenue using a top-down prevalence-to-treated-patient build, multiplied by mean annual therapy cost. Bottom-up spot checks, sample hospital pharmacy purchases and manufacturer disclosures, calibrate average selling prices and line-of-therapy splits. Key variables include diagnosed incidence, adoption lag of novel biologics, generic lenalidomide erosion, CAR-T capacity expansion, and payer reimbursement ceilings. Multivariate regression projects each driver, while scenario analysis tests high-price and rapid uptake cases before the composite CAGR is locked.
Data Validation & Update Cycle
Outputs run through automated variance flags, peer review, and a senior analyst sign-off. The dataset refreshes annually, with interim revisions triggered by label expansions, major guideline changes, or pricing shocks; a last-mile check occurs just before each publication.
Why Mordor's Multiple Myeloma Baseline Earns Trust
Published estimates often differ because firms vary treatment lists, geographic reach, currency year, and refresh cadence.
Key gap drivers include whether bispecific antibodies and CAR-T launches are fully counted, how quickly generic erosion is modeled, and if hospital discounting is applied. External publishers currently quote 2024 values between USD 27.75 billion and USD 28.42 billion, yet some exclude emerging cell therapies or apply flat pricing to 2030, explaining narrower growth.
Benchmark comparison
| Market Size | Anonymized source | Primary gap driver |
|---|---|---|
| USD 24.12 Bn (2025) | Mordor Intelligence | - |
| USD 27.75 Bn (2024) | Global Consultancy A | Omits third-line CAR-T uptake; uses static ASP |
| USD 28.42 Bn (2024) | Trade Journal B | Counts supportive drugs; limited country set |
These comparisons show that our stepwise scope selection, dual-path modeling, and yearly refresh yield a balanced, reproducible baseline clients can rely on.
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the current size of the multiple myeloma market?
The multiple myeloma market generated USD 24.12 billion in 2025, with projections pointing to USD 25.52 billion by 2030.
Which therapy class is growing fastest?
Cell therapy is the fastest-growing class, advancing at a 10.37% CAGR through 2030 due to strong efficacy and potential single-dose cures.
Why is Asia-Pacific experiencing the highest growth rate?
Aging demographics, broader insurance coverage, and accelerated regulatory approvals drive a 13.89% CAGR for Asia-Pacific between 2025-2030.
How are payers addressing high treatment costs?
Payers increasingly require value-based contracts and real-world evidence, linking payment to durable response and quality-of-life improvements.
What are the main manufacturing challenges for CAR-T therapies?
Limited viral-vector capacity and complex autologous production processes extend lead times and elevate costs, constraining near-term supply.
Which distribution channel is gaining share most rapidly?
Specialty and online pharmacies are expanding at a 13.23% CAGR as they provide integrated support services needed for complex regimens.
Page last updated on: