Medical Equipment Maintenance Market Size and Share

Medical Equipment Maintenance Market (2026 - 2031)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Medical Equipment Maintenance Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Medical Equipment Maintenance Market size is projected to expand from USD 59.29 billion in 2025 and USD 65.54 billion in 2026 to USD 108.17 billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 10.54% between 2026 to 2031.

The market’s expansion is underpinned by hospitals moving from reactive repairs to predictive, IoT-enabled service models that tie uptime to reimbursement outcomes. Regulations such as the EU MDR and China’s NMPA now require documented availability thresholds, making maintenance a compliance obligation rather than a discretionary budget line. Demand is further reinforced by pay-per-use equipment contracts that bundle service costs into per-procedure fees, especially for high-capital imaging and robotic surgical systems. Independent service organizations (ISOs) are also gaining momentum because right-to-repair regulations are eroding OEM parts monopolies. At the same time, shortages of biomedical engineers and semiconductor supply-chain disruptions are challenging service delivery, rewarding providers that invest in workforce training, secure IoT gateways, and regional parts depots.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By service type, preventive maintenance led with 40.56% revenue share in 2025; predictive maintenance is set to advance at a 12.25% CAGR through 2031.
  • By contract model, full-service agreements captured 47.53% share in 2025, while multi-vendor contracts are projected to climb at an 11.85% CAGR to 2031.
  • By equipment type, imaging systems accounted for 31.63% of the medical equipment maintenance market share in 2025; surgical equipment is forecast to grow at a 14.87% CAGR through 2031.
  • By service provider, OEMs held 52.13% share in 2025; ISOs are expected to expand at a 13.7% CAGR through 2031.
  • By end user, hospitals represented 48.13% of spending in 2025, whereas ambulatory surgical centers are projected to rise at a 12.51% CAGR to 2031.
  • By geography, North America commanded 35.13% of 2025 revenue; Asia-Pacific is anticipated to progress at an 11.81% CAGR through 2031.

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Service Type: Predictive Analytics Reshaping Intervention Timing

In 2025 preventive maintenance captured a 40.56% slice of the medical equipment maintenance market share. Predictive maintenance is projected to outpace all other services at a 12.25% CAGR to 2031. Hospitals favor algorithm-driven interventions that dispatch technicians only when sensor data signals a failure risk. This change reduces unnecessary visits and improves asset availability. Corrective repairs remain relevant, yet their proportion is shrinking as value-based contracts penalize downtime. Operational maintenance, including user training and daily calibrations, is expanding alongside adoption of complex platforms such as robotic surgery.

The shift toward predictive routines is most pronounced in North America and Western Europe, where IT infrastructure supports telemetry integration. Emerging markets still rely on calendar-based schedules because of limited network bandwidth. As a result, predictive offerings represent a premium service tier that OEMs and leading ISOs market to facilities seeking higher uptime guarantees. Over the forecast horizon, predictive models will become the default approach as cloud connectivity and cybersecurity frameworks mature globally, narrowing the performance gap between advanced and developing health systems.

Medical Equipment Maintenance Market: Market Share by Service Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Medical Equipment Maintenance Market: Market Share by Service Type

By Contract Model: Multi-Vendor Agreements Gaining Traction

Full-service agreements held 47.53% of contract value in 2025, underpinning the medical equipment maintenance market size because hospitals prefer the certainty of fixed annual fees that cover parts and labor. Multi-vendor contracts are expanding at an 11.85% CAGR through 2031, driven by integrated delivery networks aiming to streamline administration and leverage fleet-wide data analytics. These arrangements allow providers to negotiate larger discounts and achieve standardized response times across diverse equipment brands. Time-and-material contracts remain common in small clinics willing to accept variable costs, while shared-service models, where expenses are split between hospital and OEM, are emerging as a cost-controlled middle option.

The rise of multi-vendor coverage compels OEMs to unbundle traditional packages into modular offerings. ISOs position themselves as neutral partners able to service mixed fleets, using third-party diagnostic tools legalized under right-to-repair statutes. Over time, contract structures will become more granular, with uptime clauses and performance metrics tailored by device criticality, amplifying competition on service price and quality.

By Equipment Type: Surgical Platforms Driving Service Intensity

Imaging devices accounted for 31.63% of 2025 spending, emphasizing the segment’s importance within the medical equipment maintenance market. MRI systems, which require cryogen management and periodic gradient-coil calibration, dominate service budgets in this category. CT scanners need frequent tube replacements, creating ongoing parts revenue. Surgical equipment is projected to grow fastest at 14.87% CAGR through 2031, propelled by robotic platforms that demand quarterly preventive checks and continuous software upgrades. Electrosurgical instruments contribute recurring income via electrode and handpiece refurbishments.

Life-support equipment saw heightened maintenance demand during the COVID-19 pandemic and remains a focus for preparedness planning. Patient-monitoring systems, dialysis units, and endoscopes add incremental but steady service revenue as chronic diseases rise and outpatient care expands. Each equipment group carries distinct regulatory obligations, such as IEC 60601 electrical safety testing for patient-connected devices, influencing contract scope and pricing.

By Service Provider: ISOs Eroding OEM Market Share

OEMs maintained 52.13% of 2025 revenue, reflecting established installed bases and proprietary diagnostics that secure premium pricing. ISOs are forecast to post a 13.7% CAGR, gaining ground as regulators mandate parts access and hospitals seek cost efficiencies. Legislative momentum behind right-to-repair laws compels OEMs to supply diagnostic software to third parties, leveling the playing field. ISOs invest in factory-grade training and offer response-time guarantees comparable to OEMs yet 20-30% cheaper.

In-house biomedical teams also grow in influence, particularly at large academic centers that view maintenance as a strategic capability. OEM dominance persists in high-complexity modalities such as MRI and robotic surgery, where specialized components and software remain tightly controlled, but ISOs have achieved parity in patient monitoring and dialysis devices where parts are standardized.

Medical Equipment Maintenance Market: Market Share by Service Provider
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Medical Equipment Maintenance Market: Market Share by Service Provider

By End User: ASCs Driving Service Innovation

Hospitals commanded 48.13% of 2025 spending, reflecting diverse equipment portfolios and enterprise-wide service contracts. Academic centers often embed remote monitoring and dedicated on-site technicians within these agreements. Ambulatory surgical centers, however, are projected to expand fastest at a 12.51% CAGR through 2031, as elective procedures continue to migrate to outpatient settings. ASCs operate lean staff models, requiring rapid service turnarounds—often within four hours—to avoid costly cancellations. Diagnostic imaging chains adopt predictive maintenance early to minimize patient rescheduling. Dialysis centers prioritize 99% uptime, shifting to comprehensive service deals that include consumables and water-quality management.

Laboratories, dental clinics, and specialty practices contribute modest but growing volumes as point-of-care diagnostics spread. Home-care equipment maintenance is an emerging niche, where remote monitoring of portable devices combines periodic home visits to ensure patient safety and device performance.

Geography Analysis

North America claimed 35.13% of revenue in 2025, driven by widespread adoption of predictive analytics and dense networks of ASCs and imaging centers. More than 40% of new imaging equipment sales in the United States now bundle service subscriptions. Canada directs provincial grants toward equipment purchases that require multi-year maintenance agreements, and Mexico’s private hospitals secure OEM contracts to meet international accreditation standards. FDA cybersecurity rules set the benchmark for remote-service compliance across the region, influencing global OEM practices.

Asia-Pacific is forecast to register the highest CAGR at 11.81% through 2031. China’s infrastructure plan mandates standardized maintenance within county-level hospitals, expanding the medical equipment maintenance market size for OEMs and ISOs alike. India’s wellness centers add thousands of basic diagnostics requiring regional service hubs[3]Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (India), “Ayushman Bharat Expansion,” mohfw.gov.in. Japan and South Korea replace aging scanners with AI-ready platforms that use subscription software updates. Australia’s consolidated private-hospital groups negotiate enterprise-wide contracts, while Indonesia and Vietnam add first-time capacity via public-private projects supported by regional service centers in Singapore and Bangkok. Workforce shortages remain a challenge, slowing adoption of predictive maintenance in less urban areas.

Europe maintained a substantial share in 2025, spearheaded by Germany, the United Kingdom, and France. The EU MDR harmonizes uptime documentation, encouraging digital asset-management platforms and boosting service spending. Germany favors all-inclusive agreements with comprehensive reporting. The U.K.’s National Health Service pilots shared-risk models to curb costs, while Southern European nations rely increasingly on ISOs to relieve budget pressure. The Middle East and Africa witness expansion in GCC states investing in medical tourism, whereas Latin America’s growth centers on Brazil and Argentina’s private hospitals upgrading to international standards despite public-sector funding gaps.

Medical Equipment Maintenance Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Regulatory Landscape

Medical equipment maintenance is increasingly shaped by quality-system, post-market, and documentation requirements that link servicing to ongoing compliance. In the United States, the FDA Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) became effective on February 2, 2026, aligning 21 CFR Part 820 with ISO 13485:2016 and raising the focus on controlled processes and traceable servicing records across the device lifecycle. FDA guidance on remanufacturing and servicing also reinforces the boundary between routine servicing and remanufacturing, pushing service providers to keep strong change control, complaint handling, and documentation of maintenance rationales rather than relying on fixed interval assumptions.

In Europe, the EU Medical Device Regulation (MDR 2017/745) and related guidance strengthen post-market surveillance expectations, including structured PMS systems and periodic safety update reporting for higher-risk classes. MDR provisions for reusable devices, including notified body involvement for Class I reusable aspects and requirements around validated reprocessing and functional testing documentation, raise the compliance burden for hospitals, OEMs, and ISOs supporting sterilizable and reusable equipment. China is also formalizing operational and maintenance management practices through service standards, including T/CAPE 10109-2025 (released December 3, 2025; in force March 3, 2026), which supports more standardized service delivery and reporting in medical equipment operation and maintenance management services.

Competitive Landscape

The medical equipment maintenance market is moderately concentrated. OEMs - GE HealthCare, Siemens Healthineers, Philips, and Canon Medical - collectively command a significant percentage of worldwide service revenue through proprietary diagnostics and installed-base advantage. ISOs unbundle these offerings and deliver 20-30% savings, leveraging recent right-to-repair policies. Competition now revolves around data analytics rather than parts alone. OEMs deploy cloud platforms such as GE’s Edison, Philips’ HealthSuite, and Siemens’ Teamplay that convert maintenance into recurring software subscriptions tied to uptime guarantees. ISOs counter with enterprise asset-management partnerships and factory-trained technicians.

Home-care device maintenance and multi-vendor contracts offer white-space opportunities. Smaller regional ISOs and hospital in-house teams gain share in commodity categories where standardized parts weaken OEM leverage. Nevertheless, OEMs retain dominance in high-complexity fields like MRI and robotic surgery that require specialized software and training. Cybersecurity compliance raises barriers to entry, as the FDA’s 2023 guidance mandates robust processes for vulnerability management. Providers investing in secure IoT gateways and workforce development are best positioned to capture share amid tightening uptime guarantees.

Medical Equipment Maintenance Industry Leaders

  1. Koninklijke Philips NV

  2. GE Healthcare.

  3. Canon Medical Systems

  4. Siemens Healthineers

  5. Stryker

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Medical Equipment Maintenance Market
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

Compliance-driven maintenance documentation and traceability create openings for providers that can operationalize ISO-aligned workflows, cybersecurity hygiene, and audit-ready records across mixed fleets. With the FDA QMSR effective February 2, 2026 and its incorporation of ISO 13485:2016 concepts, hospitals and ISOs have a clearer trigger to modernize service quality systems, technician qualification tracking, and servicing record control, particularly in multi-vendor contracts where data sits across OEM portals and third-party tools. Standards bodies and associations are also shaping program design, such as ANSI/AAMI EQ56:2024 for medical equipment management programs and ISO/TS 5137:2026 for maintenance management programs for reusable medical devices, supporting demand for digital asset-management platforms that can demonstrate risk-based maintenance intervals, closed-loop corrective actions, and standardized reporting.

A second opportunity cluster is emerging around software-defined devices and remote maintenance governance, where upkeep includes secure updates, configuration control, and automated event logging. The EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) introduces obligations that begin applying in 2026 for high-risk AI systems, including requirements around logging and quality management for deployers, which expands maintenance scope beyond hardware to AI model updates and lifecycle monitoring where applicable in medical-device contexts. In parallel, imaging and high-complexity modalities with large installed bases (for example, MRI and CT) benefit from predictive, telemetry-based maintenance approaches, and evidence of structured preventive programs reducing failures (such as ASHE reporting a 22% reduction in 2024) supports continued investment in disciplined maintenance systems and workforce upskilling to meet uptime and documentation expectations.

Recent Industry Developments

  • July 2026: Quality Biomedical acquired M&M Medical Equipment Repair, expanding its biomedical service footprint and increasing its network of service centers. The deal strengthens regional coverage for hospital and respiratory equipment maintenance, supporting faster response times and broader service capacity for multi-site providers.
  • May 2025: The International Biomed Cross initiative launched in New Delhi to support maintenance of medical devices during disasters and health emergencies. The program highlights the operational importance of service readiness, spares availability, and technician deployment models for continuity of care.
  • February 2025: Sodexo India opened a Healthcare Technology Management facility in Kolkata with capacity to support 500,000 devices. The facility adds scale for preventive and corrective maintenance execution and signals continued investment in organized, outsourced HTM infrastructure.

Table of Contents for Medical Equipment Maintenance Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Focus on preventive maintenance programs
    • 4.2.2 Rising healthcare infrastructure investments
    • 4.2.3 Expanding installed base of imaging equipment
    • 4.2.4 IoT-enabled remote diagnostics adoption
    • 4.2.5 Regulatory uptime mandates (EU MDR, NMPA)
    • 4.2.6 Shift to value-based pay-per-use contracts
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 High cost of service contracts
    • 4.3.2 Shortage of skilled biomedical engineers
    • 4.3.3 Cyber-security liabilities in remote maintenance
    • 4.3.4 Replacement-parts supply-chain disruptions
  • 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.5 Technological Outlook
  • 4.6 Porter's Five Forces
    • 4.6.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.6.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.6.5 Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

  • 5.1 By Service Type
    • 5.1.1 Preventive Maintenance
    • 5.1.2 Corrective Maintenance
    • 5.1.3 Operational Maintenance
    • 5.1.4 Predictive Maintenance
    • 5.1.5 Software & Firmware Updates
  • 5.2 By Contract Model
    • 5.2.1 Full-Service Agreements
    • 5.2.2 Shared-Service Agreements
    • 5.2.3 Time & Material Contracts
    • 5.2.4 Multi-Vendor Contracts
  • 5.3 By Equipment Type
    • 5.3.1 Imaging Equipment
    • 5.3.1.1 MRI Systems
    • 5.3.1.2 CT Scanners
    • 5.3.1.3 X-ray & Fluoroscopy
    • 5.3.1.4 Ultrasound
    • 5.3.1.5 Nuclear Medicine & PET
    • 5.3.2 Endoscopic Devices
    • 5.3.3 Surgical Equipment
    • 5.3.3.1 Electrosurgical Devices
    • 5.3.3.2 Robotic Surgical Systems
    • 5.3.3.3 Minimally-Invasive Devices
    • 5.3.4 Life-Support Devices
    • 5.3.4.1 Ventilators
    • 5.3.4.2 Anesthesia Machines
    • 5.3.5 Patient Monitoring Equipment
    • 5.3.6 Dialysis Equipment
    • 5.3.7 Other Devices
  • 5.4 By Service Provider
    • 5.4.1 Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs)
    • 5.4.2 Independent Service Organizations (ISOs)
    • 5.4.3 In-house Biomedical Teams
  • 5.5 By End User
    • 5.5.1 Hospitals
    • 5.5.2 Diagnostic Imaging Centers
    • 5.5.3 Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    • 5.5.4 Dialysis Centers
    • 5.5.5 Laboratories
    • 5.5.6 Dental & Specialty Clinics
    • 5.5.7 Home-Care Settings
  • 5.6 By Geography
    • 5.6.1 North America
    • 5.6.1.1 United States
    • 5.6.1.2 Canada
    • 5.6.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.6.2 Europe
    • 5.6.2.1 Germany
    • 5.6.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.6.2.3 France
    • 5.6.2.4 Italy
    • 5.6.2.5 Spain
    • 5.6.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.6.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.3.1 China
    • 5.6.3.2 Japan
    • 5.6.3.3 India
    • 5.6.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.6.3.5 Australia
    • 5.6.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.4 Middle East & Africa
    • 5.6.4.1 GCC
    • 5.6.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.6.4.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • 5.6.5 South America
    • 5.6.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.6.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.6.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Agfa-Gevaert
    • 6.3.2 Aramark Healthcare+
    • 6.3.3 Baxter International
    • 6.3.4 Canon Medical Systems
    • 6.3.5 Dragerwerk AG
    • 6.3.6 Fisher & Paykel Healthcare
    • 6.3.7 Fujifilm Healthcare
    • 6.3.8 GE HealthCare
    • 6.3.9 Getinge AB
    • 6.3.10 Karl Storz SE
    • 6.3.11 Koninklijke Philips N.V.
    • 6.3.12 Medtronic plc
    • 6.3.13 Mindray Bio-Medical
    • 6.3.14 Nihon Kohden
    • 6.3.15 Olympus Corp.
    • 6.3.16 ResMed Inc.
    • 6.3.17 Siemens Healthineers
    • 6.3.18 Sodexo Clinical Technology Mgmt
    • 6.3.19 Steris plc
    • 6.3.20 ZOLL Medical (Asahi Kasei)
    • 6.3.21 Stryker

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-Need Assessment

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definition and Coverage

This market covers paid services that keep medical devices safe, compliant, and available for use, including preventive maintenance, corrective repair, calibration-related service activities, and planned service contracts delivered by OEMs, third parties, or in-house teams.

Scope exclusions: We exclude new equipment sales, standalone spare parts sold without service labor, and general hospital facility maintenance that is not tied to a medical device.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Service Type
    • Preventive Maintenance
    • Corrective Maintenance
    • Operational Maintenance
    • Predictive Maintenance
    • Software & Firmware Updates
  • By Contract Model
    • Full-Service Agreements
    • Shared-Service Agreements
    • Time & Material Contracts
    • Multi-Vendor Contracts
  • By Equipment Type
    • Imaging Equipment
      • MRI Systems
      • CT Scanners
      • X-ray & Fluoroscopy
      • Ultrasound
      • Nuclear Medicine & PET
    • Endoscopic Devices
    • Surgical Equipment
      • Electrosurgical Devices
      • Robotic Surgical Systems
      • Minimally-Invasive Devices
    • Life-Support Devices
      • Ventilators
      • Anesthesia Machines
    • Patient Monitoring Equipment
    • Dialysis Equipment
    • Other Devices
  • By Service Provider
    • Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs)
    • Independent Service Organizations (ISOs)
    • In-house Biomedical Teams
  • By End User
    • Hospitals
    • Diagnostic Imaging Centers
    • Ambulatory Surgical Centers
    • Dialysis Centers
    • Laboratories
    • Dental & Specialty Clinics
    • Home-Care Settings
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • South Korea
      • Australia
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East & Africa
      • GCC
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America

Data Sources, Market Sizing, and Validation

Desk Research

Desk research was used to set the market boundaries and to collect repeatable demand signals that maintenance revenue tends to follow. Public sources such as the US FDA device databases, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, OECD health statistics, World Bank health expenditure indicators, and selected peer-reviewed biomedical engineering journals helped us map the installed base directionally and connect it with service intensity.

We also reviewed annual reports, investor presentations, and service brochures from healthcare device and service providers to understand common contract structures, uptime guarantees, and how service revenue is reported. Where helpful, paid subscriptions for company financials and intelligence, patent databases, and an import-export shipment-level database were used to cross-check the pace of equipment placements and replacement cycles. The desk research sources listed here are illustrative only, and many other public documents and datasets were also referred to for data collection, validation, and clarification.

Primary Interviews and Surveys

Primary work focused on validating how maintenance is priced and contracted across imaging, patient monitoring, surgical, and lab equipment, and on confirming what share of servicing is outsourced versus handled internally. We spoke with hospital engineering teams, independent service providers, and OEM service functions across major regions to test assumptions on contract attachment rates, response-time premiums, and how preventive schedules change with utilization and regulations.

Distribution of primary research fieldwork respondents

Company typeRespondent positionRegion
Top tier: 28% CXOs: 17%APAC: 52%
Mid tier: 51% Functional/Unit leaders: 23%EMEA: 30%
Smaller Players: 21% Managers: 60%Americas: 18%

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

Market sizing is primarily built using a top-down approach where the demand pool is reconstructed from the medical device installed base by major equipment groups, and then translated into annual service spend using contract attachment and service-frequency assumptions. To keep the totals realistic, we corroborate the outcome with selective bottom-up approximations, such as sampled average annual service contract values by device class, along with channel checks on typical repair ticket sizes.

Key inputs used in the model include the estimated installed base growth for high-value systems (such as MRI, CT, and ultrasound), average uptime and utilization patterns that drive preventive visit frequency, the share of equipment covered under full-service versus time-and-material contracts, labor rate progression for biomedical technicians, and the pace of software and firmware update cycles for connected devices. When a country-level installed base signal was incomplete, gaps were handled by using proxy indicators such as procedure volumes, imaging exam counts, and hospital bed capacity, which were then adjusted using primary feedback.

For forecasting, we used scenario analysis supported by a simple multivariate regression layer, where service revenue is linked to health spending trends, equipment replacement cycles, and outsourcing penetration. Assumptions were reviewed with interviewees so the forecast reflects what service leaders expect for contract renewals, pricing resets, and response-time requirements over the next few years.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs are checked against independent signals, including device placement trends, staffing indicators for biomedical maintenance, and reported service revenue direction from major participants. If a country or equipment class shows an unusual jump, we trace it back to the underlying variables, re-check currency conversions and timing, and then re-contact relevant experts when the driver is not clear.

Before sign-off, the model and assumptions go through a multi-step analyst review so the same logic holds across regions and equipment classes. Reports are refreshed annually, and interim updates are made when material events affect service demand, such as large regulatory changes or sharp shifts in hospital capital spending. Right before delivery, a final review pass is done so clients receive the latest updated view.

Mordor Intelligence's Medical Equipment Maintenance Market Size Compared With Other Published Estimates

Published market sizes for medical equipment maintenance can vary widely, even when the topic label looks identical. The differences usually come from what is counted as maintenance revenue, which year is treated as the base, and how contract versus break-fix work is translated into comparable annual spend.

The biggest gaps we see in this market are tied to whether software and firmware update services are included, how in-house hospital servicing is treated versus outsourced work, and whether calibration and compliance-linked checks are counted within maintenance or kept separate. Other spreads come from using list-price service rates without normalizing discounts, and from using faster or slower assumptions for outsourcing penetration and labor-rate inflation in the forecast years.

Benchmark comparison

SourceMarket SizeGaps in Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence USD 65.54 B (2026)
Global Consultancy A USD 64.90 B (2026)Uses a slower build-up for outsourced service penetration in hospitals and applies a narrower allowance for software and firmware-related service work, which can compress totals in early forecast years.
Advisory Firm B USD 53.78 B (2025)Shows internal inconsistencies on the stated base-year value and relies heavily on broad segment shares, which can mix repair, preventive, and operational maintenance differently across equipment classes.

The table shows that most of the spread is explained by scope choices and how contract revenue is annualized across installed equipment, rather than by arithmetic alone. When software and firmware update servicing is explicitly counted alongside preventive and corrective work, and then cross-checked with installed base and contract attachment assumptions, the totals land closer to observable service demand patterns, a choice applied by Mordor Intelligence.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

How large is the medical equipment maintenance market in 2026?

The market stands at USD 65.54 billion in 2026 and is projected to grow to USD 108.17 billion by 2031, reflecting a 10.54% CAGR.

Which service type is expanding fastest?

Predictive maintenance is advancing at a 12.25% CAGR because IoT sensors and analytics enable condition-based interventions.

Why are multi-vendor contracts gaining popularity?

Integrated delivery networks prefer a single contract for mixed fleets to cut administrative costs and win volume discounts, driving an 11.85% CAGR.

Which region will record the highest growth through 2031?

Asia-Pacific is forecast to grow at 11.81% annually due to extensive hospital construction in China and India and rising equipment installations in secondary cities.

How are right-to-repair laws affecting the market?

These laws compel OEMs to sell parts and diagnostic software to ISOs, enabling third-party service providers to match OEM quality at lower prices and eroding OEM market share.

Page last updated on: