India Agricultural Biologicals Market Size and Share
Market Overview
| Study Period | 2017 - 2030 |
|---|---|
| Base Year For Estimation | 2024 |
| Forecast Data Period | 2025 - 2030 |
| Market Size (2025) | USD 3.04 Billion |
| Market Size (2030) | USD 4.20 Billion |
| Growth Rate (2025 - 2030) | 6.60% CAGR |
| Market Concentration | Low |
Major Players
*Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0. |
|
India Agricultural Biologicals Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The India agricultural biologicals market size stands at USD 3.04 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 4.2 billion by 2030, advancing at a 6.6% CAGR during the period. Strong policy support, rising organic acreage, and export-driven demand for residue-free produce are steering farmers toward biological inputs. Faster product registrations, premium pricing for certified crops, and carbon-credit monetization further strengthen the value proposition. Meanwhile, price volatility in fermentation substrates and gaps in cold-chain infrastructure temper momentum but have not derailed growth, as private and public investments continue to scale manufacturing capacity. The expansion of distribution networks remains a significant challenge, as increasing rural penetration necessitates investments in cold-chain infrastructure. Many companies have not yet fully addressed this need, offering first-mover advantages to those willing to invest in last-mile logistics capabilities.
Key Report Takeaways
- By function, crop protection products captured 76.8% of India agricultural biologicals market share in 2024. Within the same segmentation, crop nutrition products are projected to expand at a 9.0% CAGR through 2030.
- By crop type, row crops commanded an 87.7% share of the India agricultural biologicals market size in 2024. Cash crops are projected to grow at a 6.6% CAGR during the forecast period.
India Agricultural Biologicals Market Trends and Insights
Driver Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organic acreage incentives | +1.2% | National, with concentration in Punjab, Haryana, Maharashtra | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Subsidy alignment under PM-PRANAM | +0.8% | National implementation, early adoption in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Rising export demand for residue-free produce | +0.7% | Export-oriented states: Maharashtra, Gujarat, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Surge in biological registration fast-track cells | +0.5% | National regulatory impact, manufacturing hubs benefit first | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| State-level bio-input purchase mandates | +0.4% | Sikkim, Himachal Pradesh, with expansion to other hill states | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Carbon-credit premium schemes for bio-fertilizer users | +0.3% | Pilot programs in Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Organic Acreage Incentives
Government programs such as Paramparagat Krishi Vikas Yojana and Mission Organic Value Chain Development provide per-hectare subsidies ranging from INR 31,000 (USD 373) to INR 50,000 (USD 602) over a three-year certification cycle.[1]Source: Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, “MOVCDNER Guidelines for Organic Value Chain Development,” agricoop.nic.in The National Mission for Natural Farming targets quadrupling the current organic coverage. Subsidies narrow the cost gap between biological and chemical inputs and obligate farmers to remain chemical-free during the transition, locking in multiseason demand. Maharashtra and Karnataka lead adoption because of established premium channels for certified produce, while Punjab pilots tie incentives to soil-health metrics, further anchoring biological usage.
Subsidy Alignment Under PM-PRANAM
The PM Programme for Restoration, Awareness, Nourishment and Amelioration of Mother Earth allows states to retain 50% of savings generated from reduced chemical-fertilizer use, encouraging agricultural departments to champion biological alternatives.[2]Source: Press Information Bureau, “PM-PRANAM Scheme Guidelines Released,” pib.gov.in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana cut chemical-fertilizer procurement by 10% in 2024 and redirected the savings into biological distribution hubs. The grant structure also funds farmer-training programs, amplifying outreach beyond traditional research stations.
Rising Export Demand for Residue-free Produce
Maximum residue limit thresholds below 0.01 ppm, enforced by the European Union Farm-to-Fork plan and tighter United States Environmental Protection Agency tolerances, reward Indian exporters with 15–25% price uplifts when they shift to biological regimens.[3]Source: European Commission, “Farm to Fork Strategy for a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-Friendly Food System,” food.ec.europa.eu Grape growers in Nashik and coffee plantations in Kodagu routinely pay 20% more for biocontrol agents that protect export contracts. Horticultural pack-houses use independent residue testing to verify compliance, and procurement contracts increasingly specify biological-only input lists.
Surge in Biological Registration Fast-Track Cells
Dedicated biological cells at the Central Insecticides Board and Registration Committee have trimmed approval lead times to 12–18 months for products with proven safety, stimulating a 67% jump in new registrations in 2024. Provisional registration lets companies commercialize while generating final-stage data, improving cash flow for start-ups, and attracting new foreign entrants with patented microbial technologies. These measures are anticipated to drive innovation and growth in the biological products market.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Limited farmer awareness and distribution reach | -1.8% | Rural areas across all states, particularly in Eastern and Central India | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Shorter shelf-life vs. chemicals | -0.9% | National impact, acute in high-temperature regions | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Fermentation-grade molasses price spikes | -0.6% | Manufacturing hubs: Maharashtra, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Counterfeit bio-inputs diluting farmer trust | -0.4% | Unregulated distribution channels, particularly in Northern states | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Limited Farmer Awareness and Distribution Reach
Roughly 68% of Indian farmland lacks access to refrigerated storage that keeps biological products viable at 2–8 °C. Chemical-input dealers outnumber biological dealers by a factor of five, so farmers travel longer distances for supplies and often face stockouts. Product spoilage erodes efficacy, reinforcing perceptions that biologicals “do not work.” Extension officers receive limited practical training on application protocols, further constraining adoption in rice-dominated states such as Bihar and Chhattisgarh.
Fermentation-Grade Molasses Price Spikes
Molasses accounts for up to 40% of bio-fertilizer production costs. Competing demand from ethanol distilleries, driven by the 20% fuel-blending target, pushed molasses prices 23% higher in 2024. Manufacturers cannot fully pass through these spikes to price-sensitive smallholders and therefore face margin compression and output delays. Attempts to switch to lignocellulosic feedstocks remain at the laboratory scale. These challenges highlight the need for cost-effective alternatives to ensure sustainable bio-fertilizer production.
Segment Analysis
By Function: Protection Dominates Despite Nutrition’s Growth Potential
Crop protection products held 76.8% of India agricultural biologicals market share in 2024. Visible pest-mortality results and the urgent need for chemical-free residue compliance ensure steady demand for biopesticides and biocontrol agents. Crop nutrition products, comprising bio-fertilizers, biostimulants, and organic fertilizers, are forecast to post the fastest gains at a 9.0% CAGR, supported by soil-health programs. Technology partnerships between Koppert Biological Systems and local distributors integrate microbial consortia with precision sprayer nozzles, cutting per-hectare cost by 12% in pilot plots. Supply-chain investments by Coromandel International double fermentation capacity in Kakinada, reducing lead times for southern markets and addressing shelf-life concerns.
Second-generation biostimulants that enhance abiotic stress tolerance command premium price points in protected-cultivation clusters. The Fertilizer Control Order amendment clarifies quality standards for bio-fertilizers, lowering compliance costs and streamlining label approvals. State procurement under PM-PRANAM allocates a minimum 25% share to crop nutrition biologicals, linking subsidy payments to verified chemical-use reductions. Precision-agriculture platforms integrate satellite-derived nutrient indices with variable-rate sprayers, minimizing wastage and improving yield responses. Collectively, these dynamics signal a gradual rebalancing in favor of the nutrition segment, although protection products will remain volume leaders over the forecast horizon.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Crop Type: Row Crops Lead Volume While Cash Crops Drive Value
Row-crop cultivation, including cereals and pulses, represented 87.7% of the India agricultural biologicals market size in 2024. Even a modest two-percentage-point jump in biological penetration translates to large volumes for manufacturers. Punjab and Haryana grain belts deploy bio-fertilizer seed coatings that reduce synthetic nitrogen use by 15%, aligning with water-table preservation mandates. Drone-based broadcast of microbial consortia accelerates coverage across contiguous paddy fields, trimming labor costs and enabling timely applications during narrow sowing windows.
Cash crops, notably cotton and sugarcane, are projected to grow at a rate of 6.6% annually as farmers prioritize quality premiums and integrated pest management compliance. Cotton growers are adopting biological sprays to mitigate the buildup of resistance in Bt cotton systems. Sugarcane cooperatives in Maharashtra support the purchase of bio-fertilizers through subsidies financed by carbon-credit revenue, creating a closed-loop funding system. Horticultural crops, although smaller in area, concentrate value, with export-ready grapes and mangoes recording biological adoption rates above 25%, driven by European buyer protocols. Micro-injection delivery systems reduce residue risk and ensure curative treatments against post-harvest pathogens. These distinct yield and price sensitivities across crop types foster diversified product portfolios and region-specific marketing strategies for manufacturers.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
Geography Analysis
Maharashtra ranks first in state-level demand, benefiting from a diversified crop base that allows cross-selling of biological nutrition and protection products. Cooperative marketing societies facilitate aggregated procurement, anchoring manufacturer sales pipelines. Gujarat follows, with cotton-centric adoption in Saurashtra and horticulture uptake in Kutch providing dual growth levers. Karnataka and Tamil Nadu gain from proximity to biotechnology research parks and port logistics that shorten delivery timelines for temperature-sensitive goods. Combined, these western and southern states account for just over half of the India agricultural biologicals market in value terms.
Northern India is on a steeper growth trajectory despite a lower baseline. Punjab’s carbon-trading pilots and Haryana’s precision-irrigation initiatives reinforce biological value propositions. Cold-chain expansion through public-private partnerships adds 200 new refrigerated warehouses in 2025, addressing product-viability hurdles. Uttar Pradesh sugar mills underwrite bio-fertilizer usage among contract farmers, tying input supply to cane-procurement agreements and guaranteeing offtake for manufacturers.
Eastern regions such as West Bengal and Odisha represent emerging frontiers. Rice-dominated systems experiment with blue-green algae bio-fertilizers to curb particulate pollution from stubble burning. State extension agencies bundle biological inputs with climate-smart advisories on mobile applications, raising awareness in linguistically diverse areas. Hill states continue to lead on a per-capita basis: Sikkim’s 100% organic policy sustains captive demand, while Himachal Pradesh targets full transition in horticultural valleys by 2028 under its Natural Farming policy. Overall, geography influences input selections, distribution economics, and subsidy allocation, producing a mosaic of micro-markets within the broader India agricultural biologicals market.
Competitive Landscape
The market is highly fragmented, with the top five companies holding a minor share. Coromandel International, Gujarat State Fertilizers and Chemicals, UPL, Rallis India, and IPL Biologicals expand capacity through brownfield fermentation investments while acquiring niche start-ups for strain diversity. Koppert Biological Systems and Valagro leverage global libraries of beneficial microbes and tie up with Indian distributors to reach underserved districts. Joint ventures, such as Gujarat State Fertilizers and Chemicals with BioBee, focus on crop-specific solutions, offering predatory mites for cotton and parasitoids for horticultural pests.
Strategic moves emphasize vertical integration. UPL’s stake in Samriddhi Crops India secures proprietary fermentation know-how and north-India distribution routes. Rallis India’s collaboration with the Indian Agricultural Research Institutes accelerates product development cycles and ensures agronomic validation across various agro-climatic zones. Patents filed for micro-encapsulation and spore-stabilization technologies tripled in 2024, reflecting a race to overcome shelf-life constraints. Cold-chain innovation is another frontier. Coromandel is piloting solar-powered storage modules that reduce rural electricity dependence and cut spoilage by 30%. Education programs created by Prabhat Fertilizer and Chemical Works cover 500 villages and embed product stewardship to combat counterfeit infiltration.
White-space opportunities center on distribution and digital advisory platforms. Companies partnering with ag-fintech start-ups offer pay-as-you-spray models, spreading upfront costs over harvest proceeds. Export-oriented clusters encourage tailored bio-packs aligned with buyer protocols, deepening manufacturer relationships. As regulatory clarity improves, the competitive field remains open, and consolidation is anticipated through technology-driven acquisitions rather than domination by a single incumbent.
India Agricultural Biologicals Industry Leaders
-
Coromandel International Ltd
-
Madras Fertilizers Ltd
-
Gujarat State Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd
-
Prabhat Fertilizer and Chemical Works
-
GrowTech Agri Science Private Limited
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- September 2025: IPL Biologicals and Mitsui India have signed an agreement to distribute microbial agri-inputs in the Philippines. This partnership aims to expand sustainable farming solutions from India to Southeast Asian markets.
- July 2025: Syngenta plans to expand its biologicals portfolio, which includes biofertilizers, biopesticides, and biostimulants, by utilizing India's manufacturing capabilities and skilled workforce.
- July 2025: IPL Biologicals has committed INR 400 crore (USD 45.11 million) to build a state-of-the-art biofertilizer and biopesticide production facility in Gujarat. This investment aims to boost India’s capacity for sustainable agri-inputs and support eco-friendly farming practices.
Free With This Report
Along with the report, We also offer a comprehensive and exhaustive data pack on Areas under organic cultivation, one of the key trends that affect the market size of agricultural biologicals. This data pack also includes areas under cultivation by crop types, such as Row Crops (Cereals, Pulses, and Oilseeds), Horticultural Crops (Fruits and Vegetables), and Cash Crops in North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, South America and Africa.
List of Tables & Figures
- Figure 1:
- AREA UNDER ORGANIC CULTIVATION IN HECTARES, INDIA, 2017 - 2022
- Figure 2:
- PER CAPITA SPENDING ON ORGANIC PRODUCTS IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2022
- Figure 3:
- INDIA AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET, VOLUME, METRIC TON, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 4:
- INDIA AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET, VALUE, USD, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 5:
- AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 6:
- AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 7:
- AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY FUNCTION IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 8:
- AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FUNCTION IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 9:
- CROP NUTRITION CONSUMPTION BY TYPE IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 10:
- CROP NUTRITION CONSUMPTION BY TYPE IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 11:
- CROP NUTRITION CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 12:
- CROP NUTRITION CONSUMPTION VALUE BY TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 13:
- BIOFERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 14:
- BIOFERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 15:
- BIOFERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY FORM IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 16:
- BIOFERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 17:
- AZOSPIRILLUM CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 18:
- AZOSPIRILLUM CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 19:
- AZOSPIRILLUM CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 20:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 21:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 22:
- AZOTOBACTER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 23:
- MYCORRHIZA CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 24:
- MYCORRHIZA CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 25:
- MYCORRHIZA CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 26:
- PHOSPHATE SOLUBILIZING BACTERIA CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 27:
- PHOSPHATE SOLUBILIZING BACTERIA CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 28:
- PHOSPHATE SOLUBILIZING BACTERIA CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 29:
- RHIZOBIUM CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 30:
- RHIZOBIUM CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 31:
- RHIZOBIUM CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 32:
- OTHER BIOFERTILIZERS CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2016 - 2029
- Figure 33:
- OTHER BIOFERTILIZERS CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2016 - 2029
- Figure 34:
- OTHER BIOFERTILIZERS CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 35:
- BIOSTIMULANTS CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 36:
- BIOSTIMULANTS CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 37:
- BIOSTIMULANTS CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY FORM IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 38:
- BIOSTIMULANTS CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 39:
- AMINO ACIDS CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 40:
- AMINO ACIDS CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 41:
- AMINO ACIDS CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 42:
- FULVIC ACID CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 43:
- FULVIC ACID CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 44:
- FULVIC ACID CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 45:
- HUMIC ACID CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 46:
- HUMIC ACID CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 47:
- HUMIC ACID CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 48:
- PROTEIN HYDROLYSATES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 49:
- PROTEIN HYDROLYSATES CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 50:
- PROTEIN HYDROLYSATES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 51:
- SEAWEED EXTRACTS CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 52:
- SEAWEED EXTRACTS CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 53:
- SEAWEED EXTRACTS CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 54:
- OTHER BIOSTIMULANTS CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 55:
- OTHER BIOSTIMULANTS CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 56:
- OTHER BIOSTIMULANTS CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 57:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 58:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 59:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY FORM IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 60:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 61:
- MANURE CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 62:
- MANURE CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 63:
- MANURE CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 64:
- MEAL BASED FERTILIZERS CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 65:
- MEAL BASED FERTILIZERS CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 66:
- MEAL BASED FERTILIZERS CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 67:
- OILCAKES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 68:
- OILCAKES CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 69:
- OILCAKES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 70:
- OTHER ORGANIC FERTILIZERS CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 71:
- OTHER ORGANIC FERTILIZERS CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2029
- Figure 72:
- OTHER ORGANIC FERTILIZERS CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 73:
- CROP PROTECTION CONSUMPTION BY TYPE IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 74:
- CROP PROTECTION CONSUMPTION BY TYPE IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 75:
- CROP PROTECTION CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 76:
- CROP PROTECTION CONSUMPTION VALUE BY TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 77:
- BIOCONTROL AGENTS CONSUMPTION IN GRAM, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 78:
- BIOCONTROL AGENTS CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 79:
- BIOCONTROL AGENTS CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY FORM IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 80:
- BIOCONTROL AGENTS CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 81:
- MACROBIALS CONSUMPTION IN GRAM, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 82:
- MACROBIALS CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 83:
- MACROBIALS CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 84:
- MICROBIALS CONSUMPTION IN GRAM, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 85:
- MICROBIALS CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 86:
- MICROBIALS CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 87:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 88:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 89:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY FORM IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 90:
- BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FORM IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 91:
- BIOFUNGICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 92:
- BIOFUNGICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 93:
- BIOFUNGICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 94:
- BIOHERBICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 95:
- BIOHERBICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 96:
- BIOHERBICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 97:
- BIOINSECTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 98:
- BIOINSECTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 99:
- BIOINSECTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 100:
- OTHER BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 101:
- OTHER BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 102:
- OTHER BIOPESTICIDES CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 103:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 104:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 105:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VOLUME BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 106:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY CROP TYPE IN %, INDIA, 2017 VS 2023 VS 2029
- Figure 107:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY CASH CROPS IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 108:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY CASH CROPS IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 109:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FUNCTION IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 110:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 111:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY HORTICULTURAL CROPS IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 112:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FUNCTION IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 113:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY ROW CROPS IN METRIC TON, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 114:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION BY ROW CROPS IN USD, INDIA, 2017 - 2030
- Figure 115:
- ORGANIC FERTILIZER CONSUMPTION VALUE BY FUNCTION IN %, INDIA, 2022 VS 2029
- Figure 116:
- INDIA AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET, MOST ACTIVE COMPANIES, BY NUMBER OF STRATEGIC MOVES, 2017-2022
- Figure 117:
- INDIA AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET, MOST ADOPTED STRATEGIES, 2017-2022
- Figure 118:
- INDIA AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICALS MARKET SHARE(%), BY MAJOR PLAYERS
India Agricultural Biologicals Market Report Scope
Crop Nutrition, Crop Protection are covered as segments by Function. Cash Crops, Horticultural Crops, Row Crops are covered as segments by Crop Type.| Crop Nutrition | Biofertilizer | Azospirillum |
| Azotobacter | ||
| Mycorrhiza | ||
| Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria | ||
| Rhizobium | ||
| Other Biofertilizers | ||
| Biostimulants | Amino Acids | |
| Fulvic Acid | ||
| Humic Acid | ||
| Protein Hydrolysates | ||
| Seaweed Extracts | ||
| Other Biostimulants | ||
| Organic Fertilizer | Manure | |
| Meal Based Fertilizers | ||
| Oilcakes | ||
| Other Organic Fertilizers | ||
| Crop Protection | Biocontrol Agents | Macrobials |
| Microbials | ||
| Biopesticides | Biofungicides | |
| Bioherbicides | ||
| Bioinsecticides | ||
| Other Biopesticides | ||
| Cash Crops |
| Horticultural Crops |
| Row Crops |
| Function | Crop Nutrition | Biofertilizer | Azospirillum |
| Azotobacter | |||
| Mycorrhiza | |||
| Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria | |||
| Rhizobium | |||
| Other Biofertilizers | |||
| Biostimulants | Amino Acids | ||
| Fulvic Acid | |||
| Humic Acid | |||
| Protein Hydrolysates | |||
| Seaweed Extracts | |||
| Other Biostimulants | |||
| Organic Fertilizer | Manure | ||
| Meal Based Fertilizers | |||
| Oilcakes | |||
| Other Organic Fertilizers | |||
| Crop Protection | Biocontrol Agents | Macrobials | |
| Microbials | |||
| Biopesticides | Biofungicides | ||
| Bioherbicides | |||
| Bioinsecticides | |||
| Other Biopesticides | |||
| Crop Type | Cash Crops | ||
| Horticultural Crops | |||
| Row Crops | |||
Market Definition
- AVERAGE DOSAGE RATE - The average application rate is the average volume of agricultural biologicals applied per hectare of farmland in the respective region/country.
- CROP TYPE - Crop type includes Row crops (Cereals, Pulses, Oilseeds), Horticultural Crops (Fruits and vegetables) and Cash Crops (Plantation Crops, Fibre Crops and Other Industrial Crops)
- FUNCTION - Agricultural biological products provide crops with essential nutrients, prevent or control abiotic & biotic stresses, and enhance soil quality.
- TYPE - The Crop Nutrition function of agricultural biologicals includes organic fertilizer and Biofertilizer, whereas the Crop Protection function includes Biostimulants, Biopesticides and Biocontrol Agents.
| Keyword | Definition |
|---|---|
| Cash Crops | Cash crops are non-consumable crops sold as a whole or part of the crop to manufacture end-products to make a profit. |
| Integrated Pest Management (IPM) | IPM is an environment-friendly and sustainable approach to control pests in various crops. It involves a combination of methods, including biological controls, cultural practices, and selective use of pesticides. |
| Bacterial biocontrol agents | Bacteria used to control pests and diseases in crops. They work by producing toxins harmful to the target pests or competing with them for nutrients and space in the growing environment. Some examples of commonly used bacterial biocontrol agents include Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Streptomyces spp. |
| Plant Protection Product (PPP) | A plant protection product is a formulation applied to crops to protect from pests, such as weeds, diseases, or insects. They contain one or more active substances with other co-formulants such as solvents, carriers, inert material, wetting agents or adjuvants formulated to give optimum product efficacy. |
| Pathogen | A pathogen is an organism causing disease to its host, with the severity of the disease symptoms. |
| Parasitoids | Parasitoids are insects that lay their eggs on or within the host insect, with their larvae feeding on the host insect. In agriculture, parasitoids can be used as a form of biological pest control, as they help to control pest damage to crops and decrease the need for chemical pesticides. |
| Entomopathogenic Nematodes (EPN) | Entomopathogenic nematodes are parasitic roundworms that infect and kill pests by releasing bacteria from their gut. Entomopathogenic nematodes are a form of biocontrol agents used in agriculture. |
| Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza (VAM) | VAM fungi are mycorrhizal species of fungus. They live in the roots of different higher-order plants. They develop a symbiotic relationship with the plants in the roots of these plants. |
| Fungal biocontrol agents | Fungal biocontrol agents are the beneficial fungi that control plant pests and diseases. They are an alternative to chemical pesticides. They infect and kill the pests or compete with pathogenic fungi for nutrients and space. |
| Biofertilizers | Biofertilizers contain beneficial microorganisms that enhance soil fertility and promote plant growth. |
| Biopesticides | Biopesticides are natural/bio-based compounds used to manage agricultural pests using specific biological effects. |
| Predators | Predators in agriculture are the organisms that feed on pests and help control pest damage to the crops. Some common predator species used in agriculture include ladybugs, lacewings, and predatory mites. |
| Biocontrol agents | Biocontrol agents are living organisms used to control pests and diseases in agriculture. They are alternatives to chemical pesticides and are known for their lesser impact on the environment and human health. |
| Organic Fertilizers | Organic fertilizer is composed of animal or vegetable matter used alone or in combination with one or more non-synthetically derived elements or compounds used for soil fertility and plant growth. |
| Protein hydrolysates (PHs) | Protein hydrolysate-based biostimulants contain free amino acids, oligopeptides, and polypeptides produced by enzymatic or chemical hydrolysis of proteins, primarily from vegetal or animal sources. |
| Biostimulants/Plant Growth Regulators (PGR) | Biostimulants/Plant Growth Regulators (PGR) are substances derived from natural resources to enhance plant growth and health by stimulating plant processes (metabolism). |
| Soil Amendments | Soil Amendments are substances applied to soil that improve soil health, such as soil fertility and soil structure. |
| Seaweed Extract | Seaweed extracts are rich in micro and macronutrients, proteins, polysaccharides, polyphenols, phytohormones, and osmolytes. These substances boost seed germination and crop establishment, total plant growth and productivity. |
| Compounds related to biocontrol and/or promoting growth (CRBPG) | Compounds related to biocontrol or promoting growth (CRBPG) are the ability of a bacteria to produce compounds for phytopathogen biocontrol and plant growth promotion. |
| Symbiotic Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria | Symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria such as Rhizobium obtain food and shelter from the host, and in return, they help by providing fixed nitrogen to the plants. |
| Nitrogen Fixation | Nitrogen fixation is a chemical process in soil which converts molecular nitrogen into ammonia or related nitrogenous compounds. |
| ARS (Agricultural Research Service) | ARS is the U.S. Department of Agriculture's chief scientific in-house research agency. It aims to find solutions to agricultural problems faced by the farmers in the country. |
| Phytosanitary Regulations | Phytosanitary regulations imposed by the respective government bodies check or prohibit the importation and marketing of certain insects, plant species, or products of these plants to prevent the introduction or spread of new plant pests or pathogens. |
| Ectomycorrhizae (ECM) | Ectomycorrhiza (ECM) is a symbiotic interaction of fungi with the feeder roots of higher plants in which both the plant and the fungi benefit through the association for survival. |
Research Methodology
Mordor Intelligence follows a four-step methodology in all our reports.
- Step-1: Identify Key Variables: In order to build a robust forecasting methodology, the variables and factors identified in Step-1 are tested against available historical market numbers. Through an iterative process, the variables required for market forecast are set and the model is built on the basis of these variables.
- Step-2: Build a Market Model: Market-size estimations for the forecast years are in nominal terms. Inflation is not a part of the pricing, and the average selling price (ASP) is kept constant throughout the forecast period.
- Step-3: Validate and Finalize: In this important step, all market numbers, variables and analyst calls are validated through an extensive network of primary research experts from the market studied. The respondents are selected across levels and functions to generate a holistic picture of the market studied.
- Step-4: Research Outputs: Syndicated Reports, Custom Consulting Assignments, Databases & Subscription Platforms.
