Cloud Security In Banking Industry Size and Share
Cloud Security In Banking Industry Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The cloud security in banking industry stood at USD 36.17 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 80.66 billion by 2030, reflecting a 17.4% CAGR. This expansion mirrors banks’ pivot toward cloud-native architectures that cut operating costs, improve agility, and satisfy regulators demanding proven operational resilience. Demand is also rising because ransomware incidents targeting financial workloads climbed to 78% in 2024, pushing chief information security officers to accelerate zero-trust adoption and deeper third-party risk oversight. Consolidation among security vendors is giving banks access to broad platforms that combine API protection, identity governance, and AI-powered fraud analytics. In parallel, public cloud providers are embedding pre-configured compliance tooling that simplifies audits under measures such as the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), which came into force in January 2025.[1]European Banking Authority, “Digital Operational Resilience Act,” europa.eu Although North America retained a 37.2% share in 2024, Asia-Pacific is advancing the fastest on the back of national data-localization rules and mobile-first consumer banking, contributing a 17.8% regional CAGR to 2030.
Key Report Takeaways
- By software type, Cloud Identity and Access Management led with 29.2% of the cloud security in banking industry share in 2024, while Cloud Encryption is projected to expand at an 18.2% CAGR through 2030.
- By deployment model, the public-cloud segment accounted for 62.4% of the cloud security in the banking industry size in 2024; hybrid cloud is set to grow the fastest at 20.1% CAGR to 2030.
- By security service, data-security offerings represented 31.7% of cloud security in the banking industry size in 2024, whereas security monitoring & orchestration is forecast to post a 20.3% CAGR to 2030.
- By banking type, retail banking controlled 38.7% of the cloud security in the banking industry share in 2024; digital-only banks are expected to record a 19.6% CAGR between 2025 and 2030.
- By geography, North America dominated with a 37.2% revenue share in 2024; the Asia-Pacific region is on track for the fastest regional CAGR at 17.8% through 2030.
Global Cloud Security In Banking Industry Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rising sophistication of cyber-attacks | +4.2% | Global | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Real-time compliance automation (Basel III, DORA) | +3.8% | EU primary, NA secondary | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Serverless and container-native cost avoidance | +2.1% | North America, EU | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Open-banking APIs accelerate zero-trust | +2.9% | EU primary, APAC secondary | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| AI-powered fraud detection in security suites | +3.5% | Global | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Growing Volume and Sophistication of Cyber-Attacks on Banking Workloads
Financial institutions faced 78% ransomware hit rates in 2024, double the prior year. Attackers are now exploiting API abuse, container misconfigurations, and third-party software flaws, in 1 incident, a cloud misconfiguration exposed nearly 500,000 JPMorgan Chase customers, underlining the new perimeter-free threat surface. Average breach costs reach USD 10 million per incident, prompting urgent migration to behavior analytics-driven zero-trust controls that verify every session and asset. Major banks are embedding continuous compliance scanning and threat hunting into DevSecOps pipelines to reduce exposure windows from days to hours. Global payments rail SWIFT is piloting federated learning models with Google Cloud that flag anomalous transactions without moving sensitive data, demonstrating how AI can detect fraud while protecting privacy. As organized crime monetizes access to stolen banking credentials on dark-net markets, proactive cloud segmentation and least-privilege IAM have become board-level priorities.
Real-Time Compliance Automation Requirements (Basel III, DORA, etc.)
The EU’s DORA obliges 22,000 financial entities to report severe cyber incidents within 24 hours and test exit plans for critical cloud suppliers, pushing banks to deploy automated evidence-collection engines that feed regulators in near real time. U.S. regulators are moving in the same direction: the Treasury’s 2025 cloud resilience report urges continuous control monitoring for systemic institutions.[2]U.S. Department of the Treasury, “Treasury Cloud Report,” home.treasury.gov Cloud vendors now bundle mapping templates for Basel III, PCI DSS, and GDPR into dashboards, cutting manual audit workloads by 40%. Banks with global footprints are standardizing on unified compliance fabrics so a single policy set satisfies overlapping jurisdictions—particularly valuable when customer data flows span the EU, the U.S., and Asia. Early adopters report faster product launches because embedded governance eliminates lengthy security-review cycles, turning compliance from a blocker into a revenue enabler.
Cost Avoidance Through Serverless and Container-Native Security Controls
Serverless models free banks from provisioning and patching hosts, trimming infrastructure bills by 35% while raising developer productivity by 25%. Container platforms deliver similar economies but stall if images lack baked-in controls; 67% of enterprises delayed shipments for security reasons, highlighting demand for integrated container scanning. One U.S. mid-tier bank shifted fraud-detection workloads to a serverless pipeline and saved USD 30 million annually, meeting GDPR encryption rules with minimal overhead. Isolation and immutable infrastructure shrink attack surfaces as functions spin up only when invoked, limiting lateral movement opportunities for attackers. With most banks targeting 80% cloud penetration by 2026, CFOs view serverless security as a hedge against margin pressure and ongoing capital-expenditure cuts.
Expansion of Open-Banking APIs Driving Zero-Trust Adoption
PSD2, PSD3, and similar regimes force banks to expose account data via APIs, inviting fintech partners, but also abuse. Europe now ranks third globally for API-layer attacks against financial services.[3]Akamai Technologies, “API Security in the Open Banking Ecosystem,” akamai.com Zero-trust architectures authenticate every call, apply micro-segmentation, and continuously inspect traffic using behavior baselines, offsetting the porous perimeter problem. At least 60% of large EU banks will have zero-trust frameworks in place by 2026 as they retrofit legacy authentication to FAPI and OAuth 2.0 profiles. The payoff is faster partner onboarding, reducing integration times from months to days, because granular policy engines mediate access without manual code review. Vendors that marry API gateways with adaptive MFA and real-time fraud scoring are gaining share, reflecting buyer demand for consolidated control planes.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data residency conflicts with multi-tenant clouds | -2.8% | EU primary, Asia Pacific secondary | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Shortage of cloud-security-skilled talent | -3.1% | Global | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Hidden dependencies in third-party fintech links | -1.9% | Global | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Data Residency Conflicts with Multi-Tenant Public Clouds
GDPR, China’s CSL, and India’s DPDP Act oblige banks to localize data, conflicting with global multi-tenant setups. Sovereign-cloud variants from hyperscalers promise metadata isolation and local key custody, yet still lack the granular placement controls some regulators demand. Smaller APAC markets often enforce data-center-in-country rules that erode economies of scale, nudging banks toward hybrid topologies where sensitive datasets stay on-prem or in local private regions. Resulting architectural complexity inflates cost and elevates configuration-error risk, adding drag to widespread cloud adoption plans. Policymakers are consulting with industry to refine residency stipulations so cyber resilience benefits outweigh jurisdictional concerns, but resolution is unlikely before the end of the decade.
Shortage of Cloud-Security-Skilled Talent in Banks’ SOC Teams
Seventy-six percent of financial institutions admit to a skills shortfall in cloud security, and only 14% feel fully staffed to address new threats. Traditional network-centric SOC playbooks do not translate neatly to container, serverless, and API ecosystems, leaving alert backlogs untriaged. Banks seek managed detection and response partners but must scrutinize external SOCs for regulatory alignment and data-handling safeguards. Automation is filling part of the gap: AI-driven event-correlation engines reduce alert volumes by 90%, freeing analysts for higher-value tasks. Large incumbents are also funding accelerated reskilling programs, covering certifications such as CCSP and Kubernetes security, yet the pipeline will lag demand into the medium term, according to workforce analysts.
Segment Analysis
By Software Type: IAM Dominance Amid Encryption Surge
Cloud Identity and Access Management accounted for 29.2% of the cloud security in banking industry share in 2024, reflecting banks’ shift from perimeter controls to identity-centric guardrails that authenticate users, services, and APIs at a millisecond scale. As distributed work models persist, IAM consolidates single sign-on, privileged access management, and device posture checks, forming the backbone of zero-trust programs. Vendors are now embedding continuous risk scoring and passwordless flows that trim login friction—a critical user-experience factor in consumer banking.
Cloud Encryption is the fastest segment, posting an 18.2% CAGR through 2030. Quantum threat awareness and stricter data protection statutes are prompting banks to implement hardware security modules and centralized key orchestration. The cloud security market size for encryption-focused products in the banking sector is forecast to rise alongside the implementation of quantum-safe algorithms across payment rails, positioning cryptography as both a compliance must-have and a competitive differentiator. Multi-party computation and format-preserving encryption are gaining traction, letting institutions analyze data without decrypting it, a breakthrough for cross-border fraud analytics and AI model training.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Deployment Model: Hybrid Acceleration Challenges Public Dominance
Public-cloud implementations captured 62.4% of the cloud security market share in the banking industry in 2024, underscoring confidence in hyperscaler defenses, dedicated financial services regions, and shared-responsibility blueprints. Providers such as AWS and Microsoft report double-digit growth in bank workloads, aided by artifacts like PCI DSS on-demand audit packs that slice assessment times. However, the sovereign-cloud and regional-cloud variants illustrate that one model will not fit every jurisdiction, and exit-strategy testing, as demanded by U.K. supervisors, underscores residual concentration risk.
Hybrid-cloud installations are expanding at a 20.1% CAGR because they let banks meet data residency mandates while still bursting to public fabric for analytics surges. Containers and service meshes deliver workload portability, enabling stress-exit drills that shift traffic off a compromised provider within hours. As regulators scrutinize single-vendor dependencies, multi-cloud toolchains are becoming a broad metric for operational resilience, accelerating the procurement of abstraction layers that secure and orchestrate across providers.
By Security Service: Data Protection Leads Orchestration Growth
Data-security services held 31.7% of revenue in 2024, a natural outcome of regulations equating data mishandling with systemic risk. Tokenization, field-level encryption, and bring-your-own-key schemes are now standard for account data, cardholder information, and high-value payment messages. This priority is unlikely to wane as ransomware gangs pivot to double-extortion tactics that publicize stolen data.
Security monitoring and orchestration offerings are demonstrating a 20.3% CAGR because the cloud attack surface generates telemetry at a scale that human analysts cannot parse. Modern SIEM/SOAR stacks ingest logs from SaaS, PaaS, and IaaS layers, correlate events with threat intel, and launch automated containment playbooks. Banks deploying these stacks report cutting mean-time-to-detect from eight hours to thirty minutes while halving alert backlogs. With AI copilots now automatically packaging forensic context, orchestration is poised to surpass legacy log management in spending.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Banking Type: Neobank Agility Drives Digital Transformation
Retail banking represented 38.7% of revenue in 2024 as mobile apps, instant payments, and card rails expose vast consumer attack surfaces. Phishing, credential stuffing, and account-takeover attacks grow in lockstep with digital volumes, keeping data-protection and anti-fraud at the top of spend lists. Established banks run parallel modernization tracks, replacing monolithic cores with microservices that assume pervasive encryption and identity federation.
Digital-only banks show a 19.6% CAGR, benefiting from greenfield technology stacks absent of mainframes. Their entire business rides on elastic compute and managed security services, making them early adopters of serverless WAFs, inline API discovery, and runtime container defense. Lessons learned cascade into the wider ecosystem as incumbents partner with or acquire fintech challengers to refresh legacy offerings, spreading cloud-native security patterns across the market.
Geography Analysis
North America dominated the cloud security market in banking industry, with a 37.2% share in 2024. A long-standing regulator-vendor dialogue, mature private-public threat-sharing, and USD 17 billion in annual tech spending at JPMorgan Chase underscore the depth of local demand. The U.S. Treasury’s 2025 cloud-resilience study formally encourages critical institutions to adopt a multi-cloud approach while implementing real-time monitoring pipelines, thereby accelerating orders for unified security stacks that can span multiple providers. Canadian regulators now explicitly reference zero-trust and secure-API norms in their open-banking guidance, signaling further momentum in investment.
The Asia-Pacific region is expected to deliver the fastest CAGR of 17.8% from 2020 to 2030, as regulators balance data localization with innovation. Japan’s consortium of regional banks adopted a shared hybrid platform running on IBM and Kyndryl infrastructure, illustrating collaborative approaches to cost-effective yet compliant security. Singapore’s national digital ID roll-out and Malaysia’s RMiT standard also drive the adoption of IAM and real-time monitoring, respectively. China’s multi-level protection scheme (MLPS 2.0) compels encryption, continuous monitoring, and onshore key custody, prompting providers to launch local-only regions with hardware attestation.
Europe is accelerating due to DORA and PSD2/PSD3. Italian bank Credem Banca migrated to a specialist security cloud that embeds encryption and real-time incident notification, achieving 20% faster regulatory reporting. The Thales 2024 study notes that 65% of European firms rank cloud security as their second-largest cybersecurity priority, indicating a board-level focus.[4]Thales Group, “2024 Cloud Security Study,” thalesgroup.com Multi-cloud resilience drills and sovereign-cloud pilots are now contractual requirements, spurring demand for orchestration layers that enforce policies across Amazon, Microsoft, and Google environments without manual rule duplication.
Competitive Landscape
The cloud security in banking industry is moderately consolidated. Mega-vendors combine organically built capabilities with acquisitions such as Google Cloud’s purchase of Wiz, adding real-time risk scoring and sector-specific compliance dashboards. Palo Alto Networks’ buyout of IBM’s QRadar SaaS tightens the link between XDR and SIEM, enabling breach-detection cycles to shrink from days to hours. Banks favor these suites over point products because licensing simplicity and shared data lakes cut the integration burden.
Hyperscalers are embedding advanced controls natively, confidential computing, workload identity federation, and post-quantum encryption toolkits, using their infrastructure scale to undercut niche vendors. Traditional security providers respond by layering policy-as-code, real-time attack-path mapping, and AI copilots onto their existing portfolios. Identity specialists like Ping Identity and Okta deepen their ties with FIDO Alliance members to push passwordless flows, which are critical for the retail-bank user experience.
Innovative start-ups still find white-space in API security, developer-first SBOM validation, and quantum-resistant key management. However, exit valuations now factor in banking-specific compliance libraries, third-party assessment portals, and proven reference wins with tier-1 institutions. Vendors lacking these artifacts face tougher RFP slates as banks consolidate suppliers to manage third-party exposure and trim vendor-management overhead.
Cloud Security In Banking Market Leaders
-
AWS (Amazon.com, Inc.)
-
Google Cloud Platform (Alphabet Inc.)
-
Microsoft Azure (Microsoft Corporation)
-
IBM Cloud Security (IBM Corporation)
-
Oracle Cloud (Oracle Corporation)
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- June 2025: OneSpan acquired Nok Nok Labs to expand passwordless authentication for banking clients, aligning with FIDO standards OneSpan.
- June 2025: Zscaler introduced AI-based data classification and generative AI safeguards to secure emerging workloads.
- May 2025: JPMorgan Chase disclosed that 65% of its applications now run on cloud platforms, underscoring accelerated migration JPMorgan Chase.
- April 2025: The Bank of England warned of systemic AI dependencies while endorsing cloud security as a resilience pillar Bank of England.
- March 2025: Google Cloud completed its Wiz acquisition, adding automated compliance and real-time risk assessment for regulated verticals Infosprint Technologies.
- February 2025: Shizuoka Bank deployed a zero-trust architecture across its group infrastructure, ZDNet Japan.
- January 2025: DORA took effect across the EU, mandating comprehensive ICT risk management European Banking Authority.
- January 2025: A consortium of Japanese regional banks adopted a financial hybrid-cloud platform with coordinated cybersecurity response capabilities, Juroku Bank.
Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope
Market Definitions and Key Coverage
Our study counts all paid and free-to-use software and managed services that shield banking workloads once they leave internal data centers and sit on public, private, or hybrid cloud stacks. This covers identity and access management, cloud e-mail protection, intrusion detection and prevention, encryption, network micro-segmentation, and cloud-native SIEM/SOAR used by retail, corporate, card, and digital-only banks.
Scope exclusion: stand-alone on-premise security appliances and broader financial-services segments such as insurance are not sized here.
Segmentation Overview
- By Software Type
- Cloud Identity and Access Management (IAM)
- Cloud Email Security
- Cloud Intrusion Detection and Prevention (IDPS)
- Cloud Encryption
- Cloud Network Security
- By Deployment Model
- Public Cloud
- Private Cloud
- Hybrid Cloud
- By Security Service
- Data Security
- Application Security
- Network Security
- Security Monitoring and Orchestration (SIEM/SOAR)
- Identity, Authentication and Fraud Analytics
- By Banking Type
- Retail/Consumer Banking
- Corporate and Investment Banking
- Card and Payment Service Providers
- Digital-Only/Neobanks
- By Geography
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Mexico
- South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Chile
- Rest of South America
- Europe
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- France
- Italy
- Spain
- Russia
- Rest of Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- China
- India
- Japan
- South Korea
- Malaysia
- Singapore
- Australia
- Rest of Asia-Pacific
- Middle East and Africa
- Middle East
- United Arab Emirates
- Saudi Arabia
- Turkey
- Rest of Middle East
- Africa
- South Africa
- Nigeria
- Egypt
- Rest of Africa
- Middle East
- North America
Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation
Primary Research
We interviewed CISOs at money-center and mid-tier banks across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, regional cloud architects, and managed security service providers. Discussions clarified real average selling prices, deployment hurdles, and upcoming budget shifts, letting us verify secondary assumptions and close information gaps before triangulating our final view.
Desk Research
Analysts first gathered usage, spending, and incident statistics from tier-1 public bodies such as the European Banking Authority, the US FFIEC, the Reserve Bank of India, and ENISA, supplemented by global customs records on security software flows and peer-reviewed studies tracking ransomware frequency. Company 10-Ks, investor decks, and reputable press articles enriched vendor price and adoption cues. Subscription databases, including D&B Hoovers for bank counts and Dow Jones Factiva for deal stories, filled remaining gaps. The sources listed illustrate our inputs and are not an exhaustive catalogue.
A second scan tapped regulatory texts (e.g., DORA), patent filings via Questel, and shipment-level cloud workload data from Volza to confirm regional mix and technology splits, thereby anchoring bottom-up checks.
Market-Sizing and Forecasting
A top-down reconstruction starts with each region's active bank count and average cloud workload penetration, multiplied by verified security spend per workload. Select bottom-up tests, supplier revenue roll-ups, and sampled ASP times volume validate and fine-tune totals. Key variables feeding the model include: 1. Number of licensed core-banking workloads running in cloud, 2. Share of workloads under zero-trust frameworks, 3. Average breach cost per 1,000 cloud transactions, 4. Regulatory compliance spend per bank, 5. Annual price erosion for security SaaS bundles.
Forecasts rely on multivariate regression that blends the above drivers with GDP and digital-payment growth scenarios endorsed by interviewees. Gaps in vendor roll-ups are bridged through weighted regional benchmarks adjusted for currency shifts.
Data Validation and Update Cycle
Outputs move through anomaly checks, peer review, and senior analyst sign-off. Models refresh yearly, with interim updates when material events, major breaches, regulatory changes, or M&A alter assumptions. A last-mile review occurs just before report release, so clients receive the freshest numbers.
Why Mordor's Banking Cloud Security Baseline Is Dependable
Published figures often diverge because providers pick different sector scopes, input metrics, and update cadences. Some count every industry using cloud security, while others exclude managed services, and refresh frequencies vary from yearly to once in three years.
Key gap drivers include competitors bundling non-bank verticals, omitting hybrid-cloud workloads, assuming flat ASPs, or applying aggressive breach-cost multipliers that inflate totals. Mordor's study sticks to a consistent bank-only scope, blends top-down and selective bottom-up tests, and is refreshed annually, limiting drift.
Benchmark comparison
| Market Size | Anonymized source | Primary gap driver |
|---|---|---|
| USD 36.17 B | Mordor Intelligence | - |
| USD 40.36 B | Global Consultancy A | Includes every vertical using cloud security, so value is broader |
| USD 14.21 B | Industry Association B | Counts only four security functions and excludes managed services, pulling estimate down |
These comparisons show that when scope and variables shift, totals swing widely; yet Mordor's disciplined, transparent approach gives decision-makers a repeatable baseline anchored to clearly traceable drivers and yearly validations.
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is driving rapid growth in the cloud security in banking industry?
Growth stems from stricter regulations such as DORA, rising ransomware attacks that hit 78% of banks in 2024, and cost savings of up to 35% achieved through serverless and container security controls.
Which software segment dominates cloud security spending by banks?
Cloud Identity & Access Management leads with 29.2% of 2024 revenue thanks to its role in zero-trust architectures and remote-work authentication.
Why are hybrid-cloud deployments accelerating in banking?
Hybrid layouts satisfy data-residency laws while letting banks burst to public clouds for analytics, driving a 20.1% CAGR through 2030.
How are talent shortages affecting bank security operations?
With only 14% of institutions fully staffed, banks adopt AI-driven orchestration and managed detection services to close expertise gaps.
Which region is expanding fastest for cloud security adoption in banking?
Asia-Pacific shows a 17.8% CAGR to 2030, spurred by mobile-first banking and new localization mandates across Japan, Singapore and China.
What role does AI play in future cloud security platforms for banks?
AI supports anomaly detection, fraud analytics and compliance automation, with vendors embedding generative-AI safeguards and machine learning that cut mean-time-to-detect to under 30 minutes.
Page last updated on: