Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) Pad Market Size and Share

Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) Pad Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) Pad Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Chemical Mechanical Polishing CMP Pad market size stands at USD 4.32 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 6.31 billion by 2030, advancing at a 7.9% CAGR over the period. Rapid logic-device scaling, high-bandwidth memory proliferation, and the steady increase in CMP steps per extreme-ultraviolet layer all reinforce a sustained rise in pad consumption.[1]Source: Semiconductor Equipment & Materials International, “World Fab Forecast 2025,” semi.org Investments in 300 mm fabs, especially across East Asia, are bringing forward larger wafer starts that translate directly into incremental pad surface-area demand. Environmental rules that restrict per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are reshaping material development priorities, and supply tightness for petro-based polyurethane is prompting producers to evaluate composite alternatives. Competitive dynamics remain rooted in performance differentiation at sub-3 nm nodes, yet cost sensitivity persists in mature processes, forcing suppliers to segment portfolios carefully.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By wafer size, 300 mm substrates held 62.6% of the Chemical Mechanical Polishing CMP Pad market share in 2024 while registering an 8.9% CAGR outlook to 2030.
  • By pad material, thermoset polyurethane accounted for 55.1% of the Chemical Mechanical Polishing CMP Pad market size in 2024, whereas porous polymer composites are projected to expand at an 8.6% CAGR through 2030.
  • By pad type, hard pads dominated with 69.9% revenue share in 2024; soft pads are poised for the fastest 9.5% CAGR to 2030.
  • By device application, logic captured 35.8% of the Chemical Mechanical Polishing CMP Pad market size in 2024, while memory pads are expected to grow at a 9.0% CAGR toward 2030.
  • By geography, Asia-Pacific commanded 40.1% of 2024 revenue and is predicted to post a 9.81% CAGR through 2030, the fastest among all regions.

Segment Analysis

By Wafer Size: 300 mm Hegemony Sustains Momentum

300 mm substrates occupied 62.6% of 2024 revenue and continue to anchor capacity additions. Foundry leaders allocate most green-field investments to this diameter, reinforcing scale advantages in throughput and line yield. The Chemical Mechanical Polishing CMP Pad market size attributable to 300 mm lines is projected to increase as lithographic road-maps delay any meaningful 450 mm migration until beyond 2030; the runway for 300 mm pad shipments remains intact.

Applications such as wafer-level chip-scale packaging now loop 300 mm wafers through post-fabrication CMP steps for redistribution layer leveling, adding incremental pad demand atop front-end needs. In contrast, 200 mm lines serve legacy analog and power devices where pad performance thresholds are lower and price sensitivity is higher, cushioning revenue even through economic cycles. Niche diameters under 150 mm persist for compound semiconductors, yet their aggregate volume barely dents the mainstream pad market.

Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) Pad Market: Market Share by Wafer Size
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Pad Material: Thermoset Dominance Meets Composite Surge

Thermoset polyurethane maintains core relevance thanks to proven mechanical rigidity and slurry compatibility.[2]Source: DuPont, “Ikonic CMP Pads Product Brief,” dupont.com Nevertheless, sub-3 nm topography specifications expose their limitations in scratch suppression, catalyzing an 8.6% CAGR upswing for porous polymer composites. These engineered matrices embed controlled porosity, channeling slurry to the interface while dampening shear stress, thus reducing micro-scratches. 

Thermoplastic pads, though smaller in value, address recyclability mandates and find traction where device margins or environmental credits offset their higher initial cost. Material selection is increasingly application-specific: copper interconnects demand robust stiffness, while low-k dielectric CMP favors compliant surfaces. Vendors differentiate by tailoring filler chemistry and pore structure, often co-optimizing with proprietary slurries to guarantee holistic performance.

By Pad Type: Hard Pads Reign but Soft Pads Accelerate

Hard pads supply the muscle for copper damascene, tungsten plug, and bulk backside grinding, yielding a commanding 69.9% slice of 2024 revenue. Slurry-free fixed-abrasive variants, an evolution of hard pads, integrate alumina or ceria particles directly into the matrix, lowering chemical volumes and curtailing slurry waste. Their uptake remains modest today but stands to widen as fabs pursue sustainability and tighter defect budgets.

Soft pads, indispensable for advanced packaging, rise on the coattails of hetero-integration schemes such as chiplets and wafer-to-wafer hybrid bonding. Their 9.5% CAGR through 2030 reflects new demand pathways instead of cannibalizing hard-pad volumes. Process engineers often deploy mixed pad stacks hard pad for global planarization, followed by a soft pad for final polish, to navigate diverse material layers without substrate damage, underscoring the complementary coexistence of these sub-segments.

Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) Pad Market: Market Share by Pad Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Device Application: Logic Leads, Memory Gains Velocity

Logic devices, notably CPUs and AI accelerators, consumed 35.8% of pad shipments in 2024, reflecting high CMP intensity at advanced interconnect levels. The Chemical Mechanical Polishing CMP Pad market size allocated to logic is anticipated to increase by 2030 as nanosheet transistors spread across foundries. Memory applications 3D-DRAM and high-layer NAND register the quickest 9.0% gauge, their vertical architectures posing unique staircase and channel CMP challenges that favor softer, high-porosity pads.[3]Source: Entegris Inc., “Epic CMP Pad Launch,” entegris.com

Analog and mixed-signal devices continue to rely on larger geometry nodes, yet still need CMP for back-end metallization, ensuring baseline volume stability. Specialized pads are also emerging for silicon photonics and power GaN, though these remain small profit pools until broader commercial traction materializes.

Geography Analysis

Asia-Pacific remains the epicenter of the Chemical Mechanical Polishing CMP Pad market, capturing 40.1% of 2024 turnover. Multiple 300 mm logic and memory expansions across Taiwan and South Korea underpin a regional 9.81% CAGR toward 2030. China’s domestic memory push adds further volume, although export-control headwinds temper equipment flow. Japan’s strategic subsidies for new EUV lines and its leadership in CMP slurry production provide additional tailwinds.

North America’s share benefits from U.S. CHIPS-Act incentives that bankroll advanced node facilities in Arizona, Ohio, and Texas. These fabs demand localized pad manufacturing and just-in-time logistics, creating openings for both incumbents and startups. Europe’s rising profile stems from logic and power-device investments in Germany and Italy; stringent PFAS regulations there accelerate the adoption of composite pads that meet eco-design standards.

The rest of the world contributes smaller but growing pockets. Southeast Asia leverages assembly know-how to move upstream into front-end fabrication, notably in Malaysia and Singapore, which favor integrated CMP service centers. The Middle East and Africa remain exploratory, with proposed fabs in the Gulf states still years from volume production.

Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) Pad Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

Market leadership rests with a handful of global suppliers that hold decades-deep patent portfolios and maintain in-line conditioning and slurry businesses, enabling them to deliver turnkey CMP ecosystems. DuPont’s Ikonic series exemplifies integrated architecture with performance gains across removal rate, defectivity, and pad life. Entegris emphasizes segment-specific lines for 3D-NAND and DRAM, while CMC Materials targets mid-node cost optimization.[4]Source: Entegris Inc., “2025 Investor Presentation,” entegris.com

Regional challengers in China, Taiwan, and Korea pursue rapid iteration cycles to close performance gaps, often leveraging price as an entry lever in mature nodes. Nonetheless, lengthy qualification windows and customer aversion to yield risk constrain immediate displacement of incumbents at leading-edge lines. Vertical integration trends intensify as pad vendors acquire conditioner and slurry assets to lock in synergistic revenue and simplify fab vendor lists.

Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) filters grow sharper, rewarding suppliers that can document PFAS-free chemistries and circular-economy models. Recycling pilots shift value perception from one-time consumable sale to a a lifecycle service contract, augmenting switching costs and deepening customer lock-in.

Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) Pad Industry Leaders

  1. 3M Company

  2. DuPont de Nemours Inc.

  3. Entegris Inc.

  4. Cabot Microelectronics (CMC Materials)

  5. Fujibo Holdings Inc.

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) Pad Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • March 2025: TSMC commenced construction of a second Kumamoto plant targeting 2027 output with integrated advanced packaging lines that will consume purpose-built through-silicon-via CMP pads.
  • February 2025: CXMT reached steady-state 200,000 DRAM wafers per month, intensifying regional demand for memory-optimized planarization consumables.
  • January 2025: Fujifilm completed a 30% capacity hike at its Kumamoto CMP-slurry facility, citing AI semiconductor demand across the Asia-Pacific.
  • December 2024: SEMI projected 18 new global fabs to break ground in 2025, including 15 at the 300 mm scale, reinforcing multiyear pad volume visibility.

Table of Contents for Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) Pad Industry Report

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 AI-enabled design rule shrink
    • 4.2.2 Growing wafer starts at 300 mm fabs
    • 4.2.3 Rapid logic foundry capacity additions
    • 4.2.4 Higher CMP steps per EUV layer
    • 4.2.5 Adoption of 3D-DRAM requiring ultra-low defect pads
    • 4.2.6 Recycling-as-a-service programs lowering CoO
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Semiconductor cap-ex cyclicality
    • 4.3.2 Escalating pad qualification timelines
    • 4.3.3 Supply tightness of petro-based polyurethane
    • 4.3.4 Environmental limits on slurry waste tightening pad specs
  • 4.4 Industry Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Technology Outlook
  • 4.6 Impact of Macroeconomic Factors on the Market
  • 4.7 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.8 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.8.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.8.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.8.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.8.4 Threat of Substitutes
    • 4.8.5 Competitive Rivalry

5. MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 5.1 By Wafer Size
    • 5.1.1 300 mm
    • 5.1.2 200 mm
    • 5.1.3 Other Wafer Sizes
  • 5.2 By Pad Material
    • 5.2.1 Thermoset Polyurethane
    • 5.2.2 Thermoplastic Polyurethane
    • 5.2.3 Porous Polymer Composites
  • 5.3 By Pad Type
    • 5.3.1 Hard Pads
    • 5.3.2 Soft Pads
    • 5.3.3 Fixed-abrasive Pads
  • 5.4 By Device Application
    • 5.4.1 Logic
    • 5.4.2 Memory
    • 5.4.2.1 DRAM
    • 5.4.2.2 NAND
    • 5.4.2.3 Other Memory
    • 5.4.3 Analog
    • 5.4.4 Other Device Applications
  • 5.5 By Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 South America
    • 5.5.2.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.2.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.2.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.5.3 Europe
    • 5.5.3.1 Germany
    • 5.5.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.3.3 France
    • 5.5.3.4 Italy
    • 5.5.3.5 Spain
    • 5.5.3.6 Russia
    • 5.5.3.7 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.4 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4.1 China
    • 5.5.4.2 Japan
    • 5.5.4.3 India
    • 5.5.4.4 South Korea
    • 5.5.4.5 South-East Asia
    • 5.5.4.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.5.5.1 Middle East
    • 5.5.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.5.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.5.5.1.3 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.5.5.2 Africa
    • 5.5.5.2.1 South Africa
    • 5.5.5.2.2 Egypt
    • 5.5.5.2.3 Rest of Africa

6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 3M Company
    • 6.4.2 DuPont de Nemours Inc.
    • 6.4.3 Entegris Inc.
    • 6.4.4 Cabot Microelectronics Corporation (CMC Materials)
    • 6.4.5 Fujibo Holdings Inc.
    • 6.4.6 Hubei Dinglong Co., Ltd.
    • 6.4.7 Pureon AG
    • 6.4.8 SK enpulse Co., Ltd.
    • 6.4.9 Thomas West Inc.
    • 6.4.10 Beijing Grish Hi-Tech Co., Ltd.
    • 6.4.11 Shin-Etsu Chemical Co., Ltd.
    • 6.4.12 Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics
    • 6.4.13 3S Korea Co., Ltd.
    • 6.4.14 Wafer-Tek Corp.
    • 6.4.15 JSR Corporation
    • 6.4.16 VersaPad LLC
    • 6.4.17 LG Chem CMP Materials Business
    • 6.4.18 Dow Inc. (CMP Pads Division)
    • 6.4.19 Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.
    • 6.4.20 Kumho-Polychem Co., Ltd.
    • 6.4.21 U-Pad Technology Corp.
    • 6.4.22 Advanced MP Technology
    • 6.4.23 NexPlanar Corporation
    • 6.4.24 ASAHI-Diamond Industrial Co., Ltd.

7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Global Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) Pad Market Report Scope

CMP pads are integral to the semiconductor industry's CMP (chemical mechanical polishing or planarization) process, which is crucial for flattening and polishing silicon wafers. These pads, typically crafted from hard, porous polyurethane foam, feature intricate, high-aspect-ratio grooves. The study tracks the revenue generated from the sale of chemical mechanical polishing pads (CMP) offered by different market players for a diverse range of applications. The market trends are evaluated by analyzing the investments made in product innovation, diversification, and expansion. The study further analyses the aftereffects of COVID-19 and other macroeconomic factors on the market. The report's scope encompasses market sizing and forecasts for the various market segments.

The chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) pads market is segmented by wafer size (300 mm and 200 mm) and geography (North America, Europe, China, South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Rest of the World). The market sizes and forecasts are provided in terms of value (USD) for all the above segments.

By Wafer Size
300 mm
200 mm
Other Wafer Sizes
By Pad Material
Thermoset Polyurethane
Thermoplastic Polyurethane
Porous Polymer Composites
By Pad Type
Hard Pads
Soft Pads
Fixed-abrasive Pads
By Device Application
Logic
Memory DRAM
NAND
Other Memory
Analog
Other Device Applications
By Geography
North America United States
Canada
Mexico
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Russia
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
South Korea
South-East Asia
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa Middle East Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
Rest of Middle East
Africa South Africa
Egypt
Rest of Africa
By Wafer Size 300 mm
200 mm
Other Wafer Sizes
By Pad Material Thermoset Polyurethane
Thermoplastic Polyurethane
Porous Polymer Composites
By Pad Type Hard Pads
Soft Pads
Fixed-abrasive Pads
By Device Application Logic
Memory DRAM
NAND
Other Memory
Analog
Other Device Applications
By Geography North America United States
Canada
Mexico
South America Brazil
Argentina
Rest of South America
Europe Germany
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Spain
Russia
Rest of Europe
Asia-Pacific China
Japan
India
South Korea
South-East Asia
Rest of Asia-Pacific
Middle East and Africa Middle East Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
Rest of Middle East
Africa South Africa
Egypt
Rest of Africa
Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the projected value of the Chemical Mechanical Polishing CMP Pad market in 2030?

The market is expected to reach USD 6.31 billion by 2030 on the back of a 7.9% CAGR.

Which wafer size category drives the highest pad demand?

300 mm wafers account for 62.6% of 2024 revenue and are forecast to remain the dominant diameter through 2030.

Which pad material segment is growing the fastest?

Porous polymer composites are poised for an 8.6% CAGR as sub-3 nm nodes require lower defectivity.

How do environmental regulations influence pad development?

PFAS and solvent restrictions accelerate the shift toward fluorine-free materials and pad-recycling business models.

Which region offers the highest growth opportunity for pad suppliers?

Asia-Pacific shows the fastest 9.81% CAGR through 2030, fueled by large-scale logic and memory expansions.

Page last updated on:

Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) Pad Report Snapshots