Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Market Size and Share

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Market size is estimated at USD 4.97 billion in 2026, and is expected to reach USD 6.57 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 5.73% during the forecast period (2026-2031).
This growth is driven by increasing antimicrobial resistance (AMR), stricter reimbursement policies requiring laboratory confirmation before prescribing, and regulatory approvals accelerating phenotypic result delivery. Automated platforms are increasingly replacing manual methods as hospitals prioritize same-day results; however, budget constraints in low-resource settings continue to sustain the use of disk diffusion methods. The Asia–Pacific region is emerging as a key growth area, supported by government investments in microbiology labs and heightened sepsis awareness, which are driving demand for instruments. Market players are focusing on faster result turnaround, enhanced data interoperability, and compliance with CLSI AUTO15/AUTO16 autoverification standards to meet the growing demand for machine-read outcomes that integrate directly into electronic health records. Additionally, pharmaceutical companies are embedding susceptibility profiling into Phase 1–3 clinical trials, expanding the market beyond routine diagnostics.
Key Report Takeaways
- By product category, manual methods accounted for 51.25% of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing market share in 2025, while automated instruments are expected to expand at a 7.54% CAGR through 2031.
- By testing type, antibacterial panels led with 42.43% revenue share in 2025; antiparasitic assays are the fastest riser, advancing at a 7.66% CAGR to 2031.
- By application, clinical diagnostics accounted for 55.43% of revenue in 2025, whereas pharmaceutical and biotechnology adoption is expected to accelerate at an 8.54% CAGR through 2031.
- By end user, hospital laboratories generated 41.63% of 2025 revenue, yet pharmaceutical–biotech users exhibit the highest growth at an 8.32% CAGR over the forecast window.
- By geography, North America retained 42.95% of 2025 revenue, while the Asia-Pacific is projected to post the quickest regional expansion at a 6.43% CAGR up to 2031.
Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.
Global Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Escalating Global Antimicrobial Resistance Burden | +1.8% | Global, acute in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Pipeline Integration of AST | +1.2% | North America and Western Europe R&D hubs | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Precision Medicine Movement Toward Targeted Antimicrobial Therapy | +0.9% | North America, Western Europe, urban Asia-Pacific | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Adoption of Rapid Phenotypic AST Platforms for Point-of-Care Decision Making | +1.4% | Early-adopter tertiary hospitals worldwide | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Government-Funded Stewardship Mandates Linking Reimbursement to Diagnostic Confirmation | +0.8% | United States, European Union, select Asia-Pacific markets | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Cloud-Enabled AST Data Networks Powering Real-Time Resistance Surveillance | +0.6% | High-income regions with mature health-IT infrastructure | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Escalating Global Antimicrobial Resistance Burden
The 2024 Global Burden of Disease study attributed 1.14 million direct deaths to AMR in 2021 and warned that cumulative mortality could hit 39 million by 2050 if current trends persist[1]The Lancet AMR Collaborators, “Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance,” THELANCET.COM. WHO’s 2025 GLASS report logged susceptibility data from 104 countries, up from 87 in 2023, and set a 2030 goal for 80% of members to achieve national diagnostic capacity. In India, intensive-care units reported New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase prevalence above 30%, driving calls for rapid carbapenem-sparing guidance. Europe’s EARS-Net processed 474,364 invasive isolates in 2024 and piloted cefiderocol panels to track resistance to last-resort agents. Yet fewer than 40% of labs in low-income countries can run standardized antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), leaving a gap for affordable, low-complexity platforms.
Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Pipeline Integration of AST
Spero Therapeutics secured FDA approval in September 2024 for tebipenem HBr after Phase 3 trials that used real-time susceptibility data to refine dosing, trimming review timelines. GlaxoSmithKline’s gepotidacin program employed high-throughput AST to map resistance emergence and support 2024 breakpoint proposals to CLSI. FDA guidance issued that same year encourages co-submission of antimicrobials and companion AST assays, enabling synchronized market entry. Contract research organizations reported a 40% increase in AST service requests from biotech clients between 2023 and 2025, as investors demanded pharmacodynamic evidence ahead of Phase 2 funding rounds.
Precision Medicine Movement Toward Targeted Antimicrobial Therapy
The U.S. CDC launched its Electronic Test Orders and Results program in 2024 to directly integrate AST outputs into electronic health records, enabling earlier de-escalation of broad-spectrum therapy[2]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Electronic Test Orders and Results Initiative,” CDC.GOV. Thermo Fisher’s Sensititre platform is helping hospitals comply with Joint Commission stewardship criteria that require susceptibility-based audits. A 2025 systematic review found rapid AST cuts hospital stay by 1.2–2.5 days and saves USD 3,000–8,000 per sepsis patient in high-income settings. The European Medicines Agency began enforcing susceptibility testing before veterinary use of critically important antimicrobials in 2024. Despite clinical value, private U.S. insurers reimbursed fewer than half of rapid phenotypic AST claims outside bloodstream infections as of mid-2025.
Adoption of Rapid Phenotypic AST Platforms for Point-of-Care Decision Making
bioMérieux’s VITEK REVEAL, FDA-cleared in June 2024, delivers phenotypic results 5.5–6 hours after a positive blood culture, enabling same-day sepsis therapy optimization. Accelerate Diagnostics’ Pheno system produces identification and susceptibility results in approximately 7 hours, bypassing overnight incubation. BARDA funded Selux Diagnostics in 2024 to craft a sub-4-hour point-of-care AST device for emergency departments, citing a 7% mortality increase per hour of delayed appropriate therapy. T2 Biosystems received FDA clearance in 2024 for the T2Resistance Panel, which identifies 13 resistance genes in 3–5 hours directly from positive blood culture, eliminating subculture delays. The FDA demands evidence that rapid AST alters prescribing and improves outcomes, while raising development costs and lengthening the time-to-market.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Upfront Instrumentation Costs and Limited Reimbursement Pathways | -1.1% | Global, acute in low-resource and community hospitals | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Fragmented Global Regulatory and Breakpoint Harmonization Challenges | -0.7% | Divergence between CLSI and EUCAST regions | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Genotype–Phenotype Discordance Limiting Confidence in Rapid Molecular Assays | -0.5% | Global, especially for complex resistance mechanisms | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Laboratory Workforce Shortages in Low-Resource Settings | -0.6% | Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, parts of Latin America | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
High Upfront Instrumentation Costs and Limited Reimbursement Pathways
Automated AST systems often cost more than USD 100,000, while consumables run USD 15–30 per test; yet, U.S. Medicare reimburses rapid phenotypic AST at only USD 18–22, forcing hospitals to absorb these losses[3]Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule CY 2024,” CMS.GOV. As of mid-2025, private insurers covered fewer than 50% of claims, limiting uptake outside academic centers. India’s Atmanirbhar Bharat program funded USD 36.5 million for 12 reference labs—barely 0.1% of its estimated 100,000 labs—so most facilities still rely on 18- to 24-hour disk diffusion. A 2024 survey across Sub-Saharan Africa showed 60% of labs lack staff trained in automated AST, even when instruments are donated. Leasing and reagent-rental contracts ease capital expenditures (CAPEX) but shift costs to operational budgets, creating vendor lock-in.
Fragmented Global Regulatory and Breakpoint Harmonization Challenges
CLSI and EUCAST issued joint disk-potency procedures in 2025, yet interpretive criteria for agents such as cefiderocol still diverge, complicating multinational trials. EUCAST version 15.0, released in January 2025, updated eight drug–organism pairs, while CLSI’s M100-34 introduced alternate susceptible-dose-dependent categories in February, causing a one-month misalignment. FDA guidance advocates synchronous drug-diagnostic submissions, but regulatory calendars remain asynchronous. Genotype-phenotype discordance persists; a 2024 Nature study demonstrated that the detection of blaCTX-M did not always translate to phenotypic resistance, necessitating confirmation and incurring additional costs. Labs maintaining dual CLSI/EUCAST workflows double quality-control expenses and training requirements.
Segment Analysis
By Product: Automation Gains Traction but Manual Methods Linger
The segment generated the largest share in 2025, when manual procedures still accounted for 51.25% of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing market revenue, due to their low capital requirements. However, automated systems are forecast to advance at a 7.54% CAGR as laboratories chase faster turnaround times and data integration. bioMérieux’s VITEK COMPACT PRO, cleared in 2024, now ships with CLSI AUTO15-compliant autoverification, trimming errors tied to manual transcription. Consumables create sticky revenue; labs spend USD 15–30 per run on panels, media, and controls. Becton Dickinson’s EpiCenter software aggregates outputs across multiple hospitals, delivering stewardship dashboards that extend value beyond the hardware.
Capital constraints and regulatory inertia prolong manual usage, especially in low-income settings where national guidelines do not compel automation. Workforce shortages are shifting opinions: a 2024 cross-Africa survey found that 60% of lab directors viewed automation as a labor multiplier rather than a luxury. Vendors are also bundling identification and susceptibility; Bruker is adapting MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to flag carbapenemase production, allowing laboratories to justify combined purchases. The dual benefit of speed and reduced hands-on time is expected to accelerate adoption, but success hinges on financing models that ease upfront cost burdens.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Testing Type: Antibacterial Dominance Faces Emerging Pathogen Pressure
Antibacterial panels accounted for 42.43% of 2025 revenue, underscoring their centrality to clinical practice. Nonetheless, antiparasitic assays are the fastest-growing sub-segment, with a 7.66% CAGR, driven by WHO reports of partial artemisinin resistance in six African nations, which demand phenotypic confirmation of kelch13 mutations. Antifungal testing is gaining urgency after Candida auris outbreaks; the CDC counted 3,270 clinical U.S. cases in 2024, fueling hospital adoption of Thermo Fisher’s Sensititre YeastOne system. Automated antifungal panels remain under-penetrated, presenting a white space for vendors. Antiviral AST remains niche, primarily limited to HIV and influenza surveillance.
Mycobacterial testing operates in a separate regulatory lane through the WHO’s Global Laboratory Initiative, relying on MGIT liquid culture and requiring biosafety infrastructure that is often absent in many local labs. The market also lacks integrated molecular-plus-phenotypic platforms for malaria and other parasites, opening development opportunities funded by BARDA and the Wellcome Trust. Collectively, these trends diversify revenue streams away from mature antibacterial offerings.
By Application: Diagnostics Lead, Drug Discovery Accelerates
Clinical diagnostics retained 55.43% of 2025 revenue, as hospitals rely on AST to guide prescribing; however, drug discovery is projected to grow at an annual rate of 8.54% through 2031. Spero Therapeutics’ tebipenem approval demonstrated that real-time AST could shorten the regulatory review process, while GSK utilizes high-throughput susceptibility screens during lead optimization. CROs consequently report a 40% rise in AST outsourcing demand between 2023 and 2025. Public health surveillance relies on GLASS, which processed 23 million isolates in 2025, but still struggles with inconsistent species identification and breakpoint use, according to the.
Veterinary adoption is growing following the European Medicines Agency's mandate for susceptibility testing before dispensing critical antimicrobials to livestock, creating an incentive for VetCAST-aligned panels. Environmental monitoring is emerging: a 2025 Nature study detected 82 AMR genes in Indian sewage, spotlighting the need for tools that track resistance outside clinical settings. These diversified applications reduce reliance on hospital budgets and create multi-segment resilience.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By End User: Hospital Labs Dominate but Pharma Uptake Climbs
Hospitals supplied 41.63% of 2025 revenue, because stewardship mandates tie reimbursement to timely AST. Yet, pharmaceutical–biotech buyers are the fastest-growing cohort, with an 8.32% CAGR, as developers integrate susceptibility data into trials. Reference laboratories exploit economies of scale to handle antifungal and antiparasitic panels that small hospitals cannot maintain cost-effectively. Academic centers contribute to method development but represent modest commercial volume.
Hospitals wrestle with reimbursement gaps; Medicare’s USD 18–22 per rapid test often fails to cover consumables and depreciation costs, slowing uptake in community settings. Reference labs, such as Quest and LabCorp, invest in automation to boost throughput, but falling fee-for-service rates pressure their margins. Pharma users, by contrast, accept premium pricing because faster AST can shave months off drug-approval timelines, enabling vendors to charge for customized, high-throughput panels.
Geography Analysis
North America accounted for 42.95% of 2025 revenue, driven by CDC efforts to digitize test orders and results, as well as CPT codes that recognize rapid phenotypic AST. Still, reimbursement averaging USD 20 per test lags full cost recovery, limiting adoption to tertiary centers. Canada is piloting centralized provincial labs to serve remote regions, but differing reimbursement rules are slowing the national rollout. BARDA’s 2024 grant to Selux Diagnostics underlines the U.S. federal commitment to sub-4-hour sepsis testing.
Europe benefits from EUCAST’s annually refreshed breakpoints—version 15.0 added eight organism–drug pairs in 2025—and from EARS-Net surveillance, which covers 474,364 isolates. EMA rules now compel veterinary AST before prescribing the highest-priority antimicrobials, widening the customer base. Nonetheless, reimbursement disparities persist; Germany reimburses rapid AST under DRG, while southern Europe lacks dedicated codes. DARWIN EU real-world evidence supports post-market surveillance but has yet to harmonize payment models.
The Asia–Pacific region is the fastest-growing, forecasted to grow at a 6.43% CAGR through 2031. India’s government allocated USD 36.5 million for 12 advanced microbiology centers, and China has integrated AST into provincial AMR surveillance. Japan’s universal coverage eases adoption, though hospital consolidation is shifting volumes to central labs. South Korea introduced tiered reimbursement in 2024 that pays more for rapid AST, aligning financial incentives with stewardship goals. However, rural labs still face staff shortages, echoing challenges seen in Sub-Saharan Africa. National AMR action plans in South Africa and Brazil create smaller but notable growth pockets.

Competitive Landscape
Market concentration is moderate, with bioMérieux, Becton Dickinson, and Thermo Fisher maintaining strong positions through established installed bases and recurring consumable streams. bioMérieux has enhanced its competitive positioning with the VITEK REVEAL, offering a 5.5-hour phenotypic output tailored for sepsis workflows. Becton Dickinson is focusing on analytics by leveraging its EpiCenter platform to provide stewardship dashboards for multi-hospital networks. Thermo Fisher’s Sensititre, integrating EUCAST/CLSI breakpoints, supports accreditation audits, further strengthening its market presence.
Challengers are driving innovation with faster diagnostic modalities. T2 Biosystems’ T2Resistance Panel delivers results for 13 genes directly from blood culture in under 5 hours, appealing to emergency departments that prioritize rapid diagnostics. Accelerate Diagnostics offers 7-hour phenotypic results but faces the challenge of stabilizing its financial position following its 2024 restructuring. Resistell’s nanomotion AST claims a turnaround time of under 4 hours, though regulatory pathways for purely physical readouts remain underdeveloped. Vendors must also navigate CLSI AUTO15/AUTO16 integration requirements, a challenge that favors companies with advanced software capabilities.
Patent activity highlights a convergence of identification and susceptibility technologies. Bruker is adapting its MALDI-TOF platform for carbapenemase detection, creating opportunities to cross-sell to its existing identification customer base. Meanwhile, low-resource markets remain underserved, with two-thirds of laboratories in Sub-Saharan Africa lacking AST capacity. This gap presents a significant opportunity for rugged, energy-efficient diagnostic platforms.
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Industry Leaders
bioMérieux SA
Becton Dickinson, and Company
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.
Danaher Corporation
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order

Recent Industry Developments
- January 2026: ShanX Medtech raised EUR 24 million (USD 28.03 million) in funding to advance its innovative 1-hour antimicrobial susceptibility testing technology. This development aims to significantly accelerate the diagnosis of infections and enhance patient treatment. The funding will support the company's efforts to bring rapid testing solutions to market.
- September 2024: CLSI and bioMérieux launched the Global Symposium Series focused on advancing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). The initiative aims to strengthen efforts to combat the global rise of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This collaboration emphasizes the improvement of diagnostic tools and strategies to combat AMR worldwide.
- June 2024: Sysmex Corporation announced that its Swedish subsidiary, Sysmex Astrego AB, received the UK's prestigious Longitude Prize on AMR for its rapid PA-100 AST System. The award recognizes innovative efforts to improve antimicrobial susceptibility testing and combat antimicrobial resistance. Sysmex Astrego AB is the only team worldwide to win this prize since its launch in 2014.
Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope
Market Definitions and Key Coverage
Mordor Intelligence defines the antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) market as the worldwide revenues generated from manual kits, automated instruments, reagents, software, and related services used to determine bacterial, fungal, viral, or parasitic susceptibility profiles in clinical, veterinary, environmental, and research settings.
Scope exclusion: over-the-counter rapid self-testing products intended for home use are not included.
Segmentation Overview
- By Product
- Manual AST
- MIC Strips
- Susceptibility Plates
- Disk Diffusion Kits
- Others
- Automated AST Instruments
- Semi-Automated Systems
- Fully Automated Systems
- Consumables and Reagents
- Software and Services
- Manual AST
- By Testing Type
- Antibacterial
- Antifungal
- Antiparasitic
- Antiviral AST
- Others
- By Application
- Clinical Diagnostics
- Drug Discovery and Development
- Epidemiology and Surveillance
- Veterinary Applications
- Environmental Monitoring
- By End User
- Hospital Laboratories
- Reference Laboratories
- Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies
- Academic and Research Institutes
- Contract Research Organizations (CROs)
- Geography
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Mexico
- Europe
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- France
- Italy
- Spain
- Rest Of Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- China
- Japan
- India
- Australia
- South Korea
- Rest Of Asia-Pacific
- Middle East And Africa
- GCC
- South Africa
- Rest Of Middle East And Africa
- South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest Of South America
- North America
Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation
Primary Research
Interviews and structured questionnaires with hospital laboratory directors, infection-control physicians, national reference labs, and procurement managers across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America helped validate usage trends, brand mix, reagent consumption ratios, and average turnaround time improvements. Insights from key opinion leaders on AMR policy and reimbursement shaped scenario assumptions.
Desk Research
Our analysts collected foundational numbers from public, high-quality repositories such as the World Health Organization's GLASS dashboards, the US CDC Antibiotic Resistance Atlas, the European CDC surveillance network, clinical microbiology papers indexed in PubMed, and 510(k) clearance files published by the US FDA. Trade and hospital procurement statistics were cross-checked through UN Comtrade and D&B Hoovers, while annual reports and investor decks from leading diagnostic suppliers gave price and mix clues. These desk sources established baseline volumes, price corridors, and regional testing penetration. The sources listed are illustrative; many additional references informed data collection and clarification.
Market-Sizing & Forecasting
A blended top-down and bottom-up framework underpins the model. At the top-down level, inpatient admission counts and outpatient culture volumes by country were multiplied by lab-reported AST penetration rates, then filtered through reagent spend per test to reconstruct revenue pools. Results were corroborated with selective bottom-up roll-ups of automated instrument shipments and sampled average selling prices. Key variables influencing both history and outlook include antimicrobial resistance prevalence, blood culture growth, installed base of automated analyzers, average panel price, and hospital digitization rates. Multivariate regression coupled with expert-endorsed scenario analysis projects the market to 2030, allowing elasticity around adoption speed and pricing. Gaps in instrument shipment data were bridged with import codes and customs declarations before being aligned to reported manufacturer sales.
Data Validation & Update Cycle
Every output undergoes cross-tab checks against external benchmarks; variance flags trigger analyst review, and anomalies are re-verified with sources. Reports refresh annually, with interim updates when material regulatory or reimbursement events occur. A final pre-publication sweep ensures clients receive the most current picture.
Why Mordor's Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Market Baseline Commands Reliability
Published estimates frequently diverge because firms choose different product mixes, target organisms, geographic spreads, and currency bases.
Key gap drivers include narrower scope that omits software revenues, differing inflation conversion, use of constant historical prices, less frequent refresh cadence, and unvalidated penetration assumptions. Mordor's disciplined inclusion of software, services, and newer rapid AST methods, alongside yearly model renewal, produces a balanced baseline stakeholders can trust.
Benchmark comparison
| Market Size | Anonymized source | Primary gap driver |
|---|---|---|
| USD 4.70 B (2025) | Mordor Intelligence | - |
| USD 4.45 B (2024) | Global Consultancy A | Excludes software and veterinary testing; five-year refresh cycle |
| USD 3.83 B (2025) | Regional Consultancy B | Covers only manual kits; limited Asia-Pacific primary checks |
| USD 3.58 B (2023) | Trade Journal C | Uses constant 2023 prices and omits consumables inflation |
In summary, variations stem mainly from scope breadth and update cadence. By aligning revenues to clear product categories, validating inputs each year, and disclosing all key assumptions, Mordor Intelligence delivers a transparent, repeatable baseline that decision-makers can confidently embed in strategic plans.
Key Questions Answered in the Report
How big is the antimicrobial susceptibility testing market in 2026?
The antimicrobial susceptibility testing market size is USD 4.97 billion in 2026.
What is the projected CAGR for antimicrobial susceptibility testing through 2031?
The market is forecast to expand at a 5.73% CAGR from 2026 to 2031.
Which region is expected to grow fastest?
AsiaÐPacific is projected to post the quickest growth, advancing at a 6.43% CAGR through 2031.
Which product segment shows the highest growth?
Automated instruments are expected to expand at a 7.54% CAGR as laboratories seek faster turnaround and data integration.
Why are hospitals investing in rapid AST?
Rapid phenotypic AST shortens time-to-appropriate therapy in sepsis, which reduces mortality and hospital length of stay, generating cost savings.
What is the main restraint on market adoption?
High upfront instrument costs paired with reimbursement rates below USD 25 per test limit uptake, especially in community and low-resource settings.




