Weapon Mounts Market Size and Share

Weapon Mounts Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Weapon Mounts Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The weapon mounts market size stands at USD 1.85 billion in 2025 and is forecasted to reach USD 2.50 billion by 2030, expanding at a 6.26% CAGR. Growth is anchored in a shift toward crew-protection doctrines that favor remote and stabilized systems, alongside rising demand for mounts optimized for unmanned platforms and multi-caliber flexibility. Rapid integration of artificial intelligence, high-definition sensors, and active stabilization turns the mount from a mechanical fixture into a networked fire-control sub-system, raising its average selling price. Regional modernization programs, especially in Asia-Pacific, are accelerating replacement cycles for legacy land, naval, and airborne fleets, while open-architecture mandates are broadening the supplier base and fueling modular design competition. North America retains market leadership through large procurement budgets and technology leadership, whereas Asia-Pacific delivers the fastest growth on the back of naval expansion and border-security imperatives.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By mount type, non-static mounts held 62.19% of the weapon mounts market share in 2024, while remote weapon stations are projected to expand at an 8.47% CAGR through 2030.
  • By mode of operation, manual systems led with 54.39% revenue share in 2024; remotely operated systems record the highest CAGR at 8.17% for 2025-2030.
  • By platform, land applications accounted for a 65.62% share of the weapon mounts market in 2024; sea-based platforms are set to grow fastest at a 7.69% CAGR to 2030.
  • By weapon caliber, heavy machine guns captured a 43.85% share in 2024, while automatic cannons advanced at an 8.64% CAGR through 2030.
  • By end-user, defense forces dominated with 86.73% share in 2024; law enforcement applications rose 8.67% CAGR to 2030.
  • By geography, North America commanded 30.59% of the weapon mounts market share in 2024, whereas Asia-Pacific posts the strongest regional CAGR of 6.64% over the forecast period.

Segment Analysis

By Mount Type: Remote Systems Redefine Battlefield Engagement

In 2024, non-static designs held 62.19% of the weapon mounts market share, underscoring the battlefield's need for flexibility. Remote weapon stations now post an 8.47% CAGR, propelled by systems such as the EOS R500, which fuse 30 mm firepower with AI-assisted optics. This sub-segment benefits from modular housings that accommodate cannons, grenade launchers, or anti-tank missiles without hull re-engineering.

Tripod and pedestal variants regain relevance for special-forces and naval counters-UAS roles, where low profile and rapid deployment trump armored protection. Static mounts remain essential for perimeter defense but face severe erosion as doctrine favors mobile fires. Composite barrels, additive-manufactured brackets, and smart-actuator kits continue to cut weight, a requisite for unmanned vehicles and light tanks. These innovations support a broader weapon mounts market size extending across conventional and robotic platforms.

Weapon Mounts Market_By Mount Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Mode of Operation: Automation Reshapes Operational Paradigms

Manual systems still commanded 54.39% of 2024 revenue thanks to simplicity and field repairability, yet remotely operated solutions will outpace them at an 8.17% CAGR through 2030. Integrated gyros and servo drives allow on-the-move accuracy, as illustrated by Elbit’s RCWS family, which maintains target lock during vehicle traverse.[1]Elbit Systems, “High-Precision RCWS: Remote Controlled Weapon Station,” elbitsystems.comRemote control also reduces training hours and widens use-cases for law enforcement forces that lack heavy-armor fleets. Future capabilities include predictive maintenance via embedded sensors and AI-driven shot-effect estimation. As automation spreads, the weapon mounts industry confronts cyber-hardening requirements to shield control networks from jamming and spoofing threats.

By Platform: Land Dominance Meets Naval Innovation

Land vehicles contributed 65.62% of the weapon mounts market size in 2024 due to continuous armored-fleet upgrades. The US Army alone budgeted USD 3.7 billion for tracked combat vehicles in FY 2025. However, naval programs now show the sharpest upturn, with patrol craft and offshore patrol vessels integrating stabilized 30 mm mounts that counter fast-attack boats and drones in congested littorals.

The quest for ultra-lightweight frames on airborne platforms spurs titanium-alloy cradles and recoil-attenuating buffers. Helicopter door-gun mounts increasingly feature quick-detach rails, allowing aircrews to switch between 7.62 mm and 12.7 mm within minutes. The combined land-sea-air demand profile reinforces the cross-platform synergies offered by open-architecture mounts.

Weapon Mounts Market_By Platform
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Weapon Caliber: Automatic Cannons Lead Technological Evolution

Heavy machine guns held 43.85% of total revenue in 2024 due to their versatility against lightly armored vehicles and drones. Yet, automatic cannons in the 20-40 mm class will grow fastest at an 8.64% CAGR as airburst munitions and programmable fuzes defeat defilade positions and Group 1-3 UAVs.[2]Rheinmetall, “Medium Calibre Weapons – Automatic Cannons 20-35 mm,” rheinmetall.comThe weapon mounts market size for automatic cannons reflects a trend toward dual-feed systems that let crews toggle between armor-piercing and high-explosive rounds. Small-arms mounts stay relevant for light vehicles and coastal craft, while large-caliber cradles remain niche for main battle tanks and naval guns, but set high engineering bars for recoil mitigation.

By End-User: Defense Dominance Meets Law Enforcement Growth

Defense customers represented 86.73% of 2024 demand, driven by modular vehicle upgrades and new-build frigates. Ground forces remain the largest adopters, yet naval and marine units allocate rising budgets to stabilized mounts that safeguard deck crews during interception missions.

Law enforcement agencies, though smaller, post an 8.67% CAGR through 2030 as border surveillance towers and counter-drone trucks procure lightweight, radar-cuing mounts. The weapon mounts market share for civil-agency buyers is further enlarged by funding lines tied to critical infrastructure protection and urban-event security. Suppliers now tailor simplified user interfaces and less-than-lethal payload compatibility to win these contracts, diversifying revenue beyond traditional defense cycles.

Geography Analysis

North America commanded 30.59% of the weapon mounts market in 2024, sustained by the US's USD 167.5 billion FY 2025 procurement docket that funds remote stations, turret upgrades, and autonomous combat vehicles.[3]US Department of Defense, “FY2025 Weapons,” comptroller.defense.gov Programs such as the Marine Corps’ Advanced Reconnaissance Vehicle and Canada’s Arctic patrol initiatives demand mounts rated for extreme cold and salt-spray conditions, keeping regional suppliers at the forefront of material science and AI-sensor fusion.

Europe ranks second as NATO members accelerate rearmament. Germany, Poland, and the Nordic states commit multi-year budgets for infantry-fighting-vehicle retrofits, each specifying open-interface mounts compatible with 12.7 mm to 40 mm ordnance. The European Defence Fund encourages joint R&D on gyro-stabilized cradles, and field trials show accuracy gains when firing on the move. Consequently, European producers emphasize plug-and-play electronics and cyber-secure architectures that align with alliance tactical-network standards.

The Asia-Pacific weapon mounts market registers the fastest expansion at a 6.64% CAGR, propelled by maritime disputes and autonomous-system adoption. China’s fleet will reach nearly 395 ships by 2025, creating sustained demand for deck-mounted 30 mm cannons. India pursues self-reliance through the indigenous 12.7 mm remote station on its ‘Zorawar’ light tank, demonstrating home-grown production capacity. Japan and South Korea invest in AI-enabled naval mounts with compact AESA radars to counter swarming drones. These parallel initiatives broaden regional supplier ecosystems and heighten technology-transfer negotiations.

Weapon Mounts Market_Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

The weapon mounts industry shows moderate concentration, led by Kongsberg Gruppen ASA, BAE Systems plc, Rheinmetall AG, and Elbit Systems Ltd.—firms that leverage scale for R&D spending and global service footprints. American Rheinmetall Systems (Rheinmetall AG) illustrates the shift toward intelligent mounts incorporating machine-learning algorithms and multispectral sensors that shrink the sensor-to-shooter loop.

Strategic alliances, licensing agreements, and offset production deals proliferate as vendors pursue growth in Asia-Pacific and the Middle East, where local content rules apply. Examples include joint ventures for turret integration on Indigenous armored vehicles and technology transfers enabling regional assembly of servo-actuator modules. Smaller specialists exploit open-architecture standards to supply drop-in sub-assemblies—optical pods, recoil-attenuation packs, or composite cradles—creating a tiered supplier landscape.

Innovation pipelines prioritize weight reduction via magnesium alloys, advanced stabilization for accuracy on high-speed craft, and embedded prognostic-health software that alerts crews to impending motor or gyro faults. Companies also position mounts as key nodes in short-range air-defense kill chains, integrating cueing from radar and electro-optical sensors to launch interceptors or high-powered microwave payloads. This convergence blurs traditional product categories and intensifies competition between gun-system integrators and directed-energy developers

Weapon Mounts Industry Leaders

  1. Kongsberg Gruppen ASA

  2. BAE Systems plc

  3. Rheinmetall AG

  4. Elbit Systems Ltd.

  5. RTX Corporation

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Weapon Mounts Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Recent Industry Developments

  • May 2025: Curtiss-Wright Defense Solutions was awarded a USD 5 million order to supply stabilization controllers and gyros for Romania’s ANUBIS 3.0 remote station, with deliveries through 2028.
  • April 2025: Electro Optic Systems (EOS) unveiled the R500 remote weapon station, which features the M230LF dual-feed 30×113mm gun, 7.62mm machine gun, and two missile tubes compatible with Javelin, Spike, or TOW systems.
  • June 2024: Thales Belgium (Thales), WB Electronics, and AREX signed an MoU to co-develop a lightweight remote weapon turret adaptable from 5.56 mm to 40 mm calibers.

Table of Contents for Weapon Mounts Industry Report

1. INTRODUCTION

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

4. MARKET LANDSCAPE

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Crew survivability via remote and stabilized mounts
    • 4.2.2 Retrofit of aging land, naval and airborne fleets
    • 4.2.3 Proliferation of UGVs, USVs and armed UAVs
    • 4.2.4 AI, HD sensors, and active stabilization raise subsystem value
    • 4.2.5 Rapid weapon interchange for joint-force operations
    • 4.2.6 Open-interface, plug-and-play multi-caliber designs
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Stringent export and compliance regimes
    • 4.3.2 Procurement-cycle volatility
    • 4.3.3 High R&D cost for high-caliber recoil mitigation
    • 4.3.4 Payload/power limits for advanced electronics
  • 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Regulatory and Technological Outlook
  • 4.6 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.6.1 Bargaining Power of Buyers/Consumers
    • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.6.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitute Products
    • 4.6.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. MARKET SIZE AND GROWTH FORECASTS (VALUE)

  • 5.1 By Mount Type
    • 5.1.1 Static
    • 5.1.2 Non-Static
    • 5.1.2.1 Tripod
    • 5.1.2.2 Vehicle / Turret
    • 5.1.2.3 Coaxial / Pedestal
    • 5.1.2.4 Remote Weapon Station Mounts
  • 5.2 By Mode of Operation
    • 5.2.1 Manual
    • 5.2.2 Remotely Operated
  • 5.3 By Platform
    • 5.3.1 Land
    • 5.3.1.1 Armored Fighting Vehicles
    • 5.3.1.2 Light Tactical Vehicles
    • 5.3.1.3 Fixed Ground Installations
    • 5.3.2 Air
    • 5.3.2.1 Rotary-Wing
    • 5.3.2.2 Fixed-Wing
    • 5.3.2.3 Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    • 5.3.3 Sea
    • 5.3.3.1 Surface Combatants
    • 5.3.3.2 Patrol Craft and Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs)
    • 5.3.3.3 Sub-surface Platforms
  • 5.4 By Weapon Caliber
    • 5.4.1 Small Arms
    • 5.4.2 Heavy Machine Guns
    • 5.4.3 Automatic Cannons
    • 5.4.4 Large Caliber
  • 5.5 By End-User
    • 5.5.1 Defense Forces
    • 5.5.2 Law Enforcement
  • 5.6 By Geography
    • 5.6.1 North America
    • 5.6.1.1 United States
    • 5.6.1.2 Canada
    • 5.6.2 Europe
    • 5.6.2.1 Germany
    • 5.6.2.2 France
    • 5.6.2.3 United Kingdom
    • 5.6.2.4 Italy
    • 5.6.2.5 Russia
    • 5.6.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.6.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.3.1 China
    • 5.6.3.2 India
    • 5.6.3.3 Japan
    • 5.6.3.4 South Korea
    • 5.6.3.5 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.6.4 South America
    • 5.6.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.6.4.2 Rest of South America
    • 5.6.5 Middle East and Africa
    • 5.6.5.1 Middle East
    • 5.6.5.1.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.6.5.1.2 United Arab Emirates
    • 5.6.5.1.3 Israel
    • 5.6.5.1.4 Rest of Middle East
    • 5.6.5.2 Africa
    • 5.6.5.2.1 South Africa
    • 5.6.5.2.2 Rest of Africa

6. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Kongsberg Gruppen ASA
    • 6.4.2 BAE Systems plc
    • 6.4.3 Rheinmetall AG
    • 6.4.4 RTX Corporation
    • 6.4.5 Saab AB
    • 6.4.6 Elbit Systems Ltd.
    • 6.4.7 FN Herstal, S.A.
    • 6.4.8 Dillon Aero, LLC
    • 6.4.9 Leonardo S.p.A.
    • 6.4.10 Military Systems Group Inc.
    • 6.4.11 Thales Group
    • 6.4.12 General Dynamics Corporation
    • 6.4.13 Singapore Technologies Engineering Ltd.
    • 6.4.14 KNDS
    • 6.4.15 ASELSAN A.S.
    • 6.4.16 Moog Inc.
    • 6.4.17 Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd.
    • 6.4.18 FNSS Savunma Sistemleri A.S.

7. MARKET OPPORTUNITIES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the weapon mounts market as the value generated from new, factory-built static and non-static assemblies, turrets, pedestals, pintles, remote stations, tripods, and similar fixtures that secure firearms or cannons to land, naval, airborne, and unmanned platforms. The estimate covers original-equipment supply and certified retrofit kits delivered through prime contractors and specialized mount makers during 2024.

Scope exclusion: aftermarket fire-control electronics and stand-alone recoil dampers are not counted.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Mount Type
    • Static
    • Non-Static
      • Tripod
      • Vehicle / Turret
      • Coaxial / Pedestal
      • Remote Weapon Station Mounts
  • By Mode of Operation
    • Manual
    • Remotely Operated
  • By Platform
    • Land
      • Armored Fighting Vehicles
      • Light Tactical Vehicles
      • Fixed Ground Installations
    • Air
      • Rotary-Wing
      • Fixed-Wing
      • Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
    • Sea
      • Surface Combatants
      • Patrol Craft and Offshore Patrol Vessels (OPVs)
      • Sub-surface Platforms
  • By Weapon Caliber
    • Small Arms
    • Heavy Machine Guns
    • Automatic Cannons
    • Large Caliber
  • By End-User
    • Defense Forces
    • Law Enforcement
  • By Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • France
      • United Kingdom
      • Italy
      • Russia
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • India
      • Japan
      • South Korea
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Rest of South America
    • Middle East and Africa
      • Middle East
        • Saudi Arabia
        • United Arab Emirates
        • Israel
        • Rest of Middle East
      • Africa
        • South Africa
        • Rest of Africa

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Mordor analysts interviewed procurement officers, vehicle OEM integration engineers, and turret program managers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific. Insights on retrofit rates, remote station adoption, and average selling prices (ASP) by caliber allowed us to calibrate shipment volumes that are not disclosed in public releases.

Desk Research

We first assembled open data on defense procurement, fleet inventories, and trade flows from sources such as SIPRI arms transfer logs, UN Comtrade shipment codes, NATO and U.S. DoD budget justifications, and major regional defense white papers. Company 10-K filings, offset agreements published by ministries, and patent abstracts on stabilized cradles helped us benchmark unit costs. Where gaps persisted, we tapped paid libraries in D&B Hoovers for mount supplier revenues and Dow Jones Factiva for program news. The sources cited illustrate, not exhaust, the desk research pool we explored for cross-checks and signal validation.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

A top-down build started with platform production and active fleet data, reconstructed into a demand pool through estimated mount saturation rates by vehicle class. Results were then corroborated with bottom-up roll-ups from sampled supplier revenues and ASP x volume checks, ensuring totals align with real cash flows. Key variables include active armored vehicle stock, new-build naval hull deliveries, remote weapon station penetration, average life-cycle replacement interval, and export license approvals. Forecasts to 2029 rely on multivariate regression that pairs defense spending trajectories with those operational variables, with scenario bands vetted by primary sources.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs pass three layers of analyst review, variance tests against external signals, and automated anomaly flags. The model refreshes annually; interim updates are triggered when sizeable contracts, sanctions, or exchange-rate swings materially alter baseline assumptions.

Why Mordor's Weapon Mounts Baseline Commands Confidence

Published market values often diverge because firms choose dissimilar scopes, pricing bases, and refresh cadences.

By defining a clean boundary around mount hardware, updating every year, and blending fleet math with selective supplier roll-ups, Mordor delivers a balanced, reproducible baseline.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 1.64 B (2024) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 1.92 B (2024) Regional Consultancy A Excludes retrofit kits on legacy fleets, inflating OEM share
USD 6.42 B (2024) Global Consultancy B Counts remote stations, sensors, and stabilization electronics together, widening scope
USD 1.30 B (2020) Trade Journal C Uses older base year and shipment-only approach without ASP adjustment

The comparison shows that wider or narrower scopes, and even currency year choice, drive gaps.

By anchoring calculations to explicit platform counts, vetted ASPs, and a clear scope, Mordor Intelligence offers decision-makers the most transparent and dependable market view.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current value of the weapon mounts market?

The market is valued at USD 1.85 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 2.50 billion by 2030, reflecting a 6.26% CAGR.

Which segment is growing fastest within the weapon mounts market?

Remote weapon stations lead growth with an 8.17% CAGR, driven by demand for crew protection and enhanced targeting capabilities.

How significant is Asia-Pacific to future market expansion?

Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region at a 6.64% CAGR, fueled by naval modernization and autonomous-system procurement.

What technological trends are redefining mount capabilities?

AI-enabled target tracking, high-definition sensors, active stabilization and open-architecture electronics are elevating mounts into smart fire-control subsystems.

How do export controls affect weapon mounts suppliers?

Stringent regimes such as ITAR prolong contract cycles and restrict some advanced technologies, compelling suppliers to develop compliant variants or pursue local partnerships.

Are homeland-security agencies adopting military-grade mounts?

Yes. Homeland-security demand is rising at an 8.67% CAGR as agencies integrate lightweight remote mounts for border surveillance and counter-drone missions.

Page last updated on:

Weapon Mounts Report Snapshots