Venous Stents Market Size and Share
Venous Stents Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The venous stents market stands at USD 1.28 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 1.89 billion by 2030, translating into an 8.05% CAGR over the period. Robust demand comes from growing recognition that dedicated venous stents deliver better long-term patency than balloon angioplasty, especially in chronic deep vein obstruction. Market momentum is reinforced by higher disease prevalence in aging populations, steady regulatory approvals for nitinol-based devices, and payers embracing outpatient venous procedures. Clinical data showing 84.0% three-year primary patency with modern stents continues to drive physician confidence. On the supply side, manufacturers are mitigating raw-material risks through diversified nitinol sourcing while accelerating innovation in drug-eluting and polymer-coated platforms to maintain competitive differentiation.
Key Report Takeaways
- By application, leg interventions led with 43.56% of venous stents market share in 2024, whereas pelvic procedures are forecast to grow at a 12.46% CAGR to 2030.
- By disease, chronic deep vein thrombosis accounted for 39.65% of the venous stents market size in 2024, while non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions will expand at an 11.34% CAGR through 2030.
- By stent type, self-expanding nitinol platforms held 59.45% of 2024 revenue; drug-eluting devices are expected to post the fastest 12.04% CAGR.
- By material, nitinol commanded 72.33% share of the venous stents market size in 2024; polymer-enhanced designs are set to rise at 11.78% CAGR.
- By end user, hospitals represented 62.21% revenue share in 2024, but ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) show the highest 12.66% projected CAGR.
- By geography, North America led with 38.72% share in 2024, while Asia-Pacific is projected to grow at 11.46% CAGR to 2030.
Global Venous Stents Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rising prevalence of chronic venous disease | +1.2% | North America, Europe, APAC | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Ageing population boosting interventions | +0.9% | High-income economies | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Dedicated nitinol venous stents approvals | +1.4% | North America, Europe | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Favourable outpatient reimbursement | +1.1% | United States, selected EU states | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| IVUS-guided sizing improving patency | +0.8% | Advanced healthcare systems | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Surge in ambulatory vascular centres | +1.0% | United States, expanding in APAC | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Rising Prevalence of Chronic Symptomatic Venous Diseases
Post-thrombotic syndrome affects up to 50% of patients after deep vein thrombosis, and earlier detection is funneling more candidates toward intervention[1]Raghu Kolluri, “Consensus Statement on the Management of Nonthrombotic Iliac Vein Lesions,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, ahajournals.org . The VERNACULAR study reported 84.0% primary patency at 36 months for modern stents, underscoring their value in difficult cases. Growing awareness of May-Thurner syndrome among younger adults is widening the treated population. These epidemiologic shifts are most evident in markets with robust vascular specialization and aging demographics. As a result, the venous stents market is poised to benefit from sustained procedure growth over the forecast horizon.
Ageing Population Boosting Venous Interventions
Populations aged 65+ experience higher chronic venous insufficiency, prompting guideline updates that advocate earlier stenting when conservative therapy fails.[2]Joakim Nordanstig, “ESVS 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines,” esvs.org Geriatric patients often present with multimorbidity, so devices designed for shorter procedure times and lower anticoagulation needs are gaining favor. Japan and Western Europe exemplify how super-aged societies accelerate adoption of minimally invasive venous treatments. These macro-demographics give the venous stents market a durable, long-term growth underpinning.
Dedicated Nitinol Venous Stents Gaining Regulatory Approvals
FDA clearance of purpose-built platforms such as the Abre stent, which achieved 81.6% three-year patency with no fracture events, validates superior design tailored to venous anatomy. Europe is now harmonizing approval criteria around quality-of-life endpoints, further smoothing pathways for new entrants. Clearer regulatory definitions distinguish venous from arterial devices, prompting companies to fund specialized R&D and physician training programs. These developments expand the venous stents market as a distinct therapeutic category.
Favourable Reimbursement for Outpatient Venous Procedures
Medicare and several private insurers now reimburse same-day venous stenting performed in ASCs, lowering total episode costs while preserving outcomes. Bundled payments that include imaging, stent placement and surveillance support integrated care pathways. Clinicians are incentivized to adopt standardized protocols, helping drive procedural migration from inpatient to outpatient settings. This economic tailwind is particularly strong in the United States and certain EU markets, amplifying overall market demand.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| High procedure cost & limited awareness | -0.7% | Emerging markets, cost-sensitive systems | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| In-stent restenosis or re-occlusion risk | -0.5% | Global | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Nitinol supply-chain disruptions | -0.9% | Worldwide, notably Asia-based processors | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Early product recalls dampening confidence | -0.4% | North America, Europe | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
High Procedure Cost & Limited Patient Awareness
Total treatment cost can exceed USD 15,000 in systems without strong coverage, limiting access in lower-income regions. Many patients remain unaware that minimally invasive venous therapies exist, and community clinics often lack the imaging needed for diagnosis. Education campaigns aimed at primary care and the public are critical to expanding the venous stents market. Without them, underdiagnosis will continue to suppress demand despite clinical efficacy.
In-Stent Restenosis / Re-Occlusion Risk
Re-stenosis, although less frequent with modern designs, still poses a concern for clinicians managing complex anatomy. Follow-up imaging requirements add cost and can deter patients in price-sensitive markets. Development of drug-eluting and polymer-coated stents seeks to mitigate this risk, but long-term data remain a prerequisite for widespread adoption.
Segment Analysis
By Application: Pelvic Interventions Drive Growth
Leg interventions generated the largest revenue in 2024, capturing 43.56% of the venous stents market size because post-thrombotic iliofemoral obstruction remains the most common indication. Pelvic procedures, fueled by heightened recognition of May-Thurner syndrome, will outpace all other segments at a 12.46% CAGR. TOPOS trial data showing 90% 12-month patency for oblique nitinol stents in common iliac compression underpin this momentum.[3]Tim Sebastian, “The TOPOS Study,” Vascular Medicine, journals.sagepub.comEmergence of dedicated protocols for chronic pelvic pain is channeling younger patients toward intervention, expanding total addressable volume.
Rising use of IVUS and venography in office-based labs elevates diagnostic accuracy for pelvic lesions, improving patient selection and outcomes. ASCs leverage shorter recovery times to attract these cases, supporting outpatient expansion within the venous stents market. Meanwhile, abdominal IVC and renal vein work remains niche, and chest interventions for superior vena cava syndrome are largely confined to tertiary centers. Collectively, these trends diversify procedural mix and reinforce long-term market vitality.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Disease: Non-Thrombotic Lesions Gain Momentum
Chronic deep vein thrombosis retained 39.65% venous stents market share in 2024, but non-thrombotic iliac vein lesions will log an 11.34% CAGR through 2030 as clinicians diagnose compression earlier. Abre stent data revealing 97.1% three-year patency in NIVL patients bolsters confidence. Post-thrombotic syndrome, with its collateral burden, still commands large volumes, yet improved algorithms segregate thrombotic from non-thrombotic cases more effectively.
Expanding indications now include venous claudication and chronic pelvic pain, broadening the candidate pool. Acute DVT cases increasingly see adjunctive stenting following thrombectomy to maintain flow. Future growth will depend on payer recognition of these new indications and continued performance of dedicated devices across lesion types.
By Stent Type: Drug-Eluting Platforms Emerge
Self-expanding nitinol devices delivered 59.45% revenue in 2024, reflecting proven reliability and ease of deployment. Drug-eluting designs, however, will post the leading 12.04% CAGR as trials confirm lower neointimal proliferation. Polymer advancements enable sustained paclitaxel delivery tailored to low-pressure venous flow, pushing adoption further. Covered stents occupy a specific niche in rupture-prone or highly calcified anatomy, while balloon-expandable products gradually decline in favor.
The venous stents market is entering a precision-therapy phase in which combination treatments pair pharmacology with mechanical scaffolds. Manufacturers capable of demonstrating long-term superiority through head-to-head studies will capture share as value-based procurement gains ground.
By Material: Polymer Innovation Accelerates
Nitinol continues to dominate with 72.33% venous stents market share given unmatched super-elasticity. Yet polymer-enhanced constructs will grow 11.78% annually, aiming to curb thrombogenicity and deliver drugs efficiently. Elgiloy and cobalt-chromium solutions serve smaller sub-segments demanding radiopacity or controlled expansion. Stainless steel’s proportion will keep shrinking as newer alloys prove safer and more adaptable.
Material science breakthroughs enable thinner struts that preserve radial strength, aiding deliverability through tortuous venous anatomy. Radiopaque markers integrated into polymer coatings improve intra-procedural visualization, reducing fluoroscopy time and contrast load. Together, these advances sustain a robust innovation pipeline and deepen competitive differentiation.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By End-User: ASC Growth Transforms Care Delivery
Hospitals managed 62.21% of global revenue in 2024, but the ASC channel is expanding at 12.66% CAGR as outpatient models gain payer endorsement. Conscious sedation protocols and smaller access profiles shorten recovery, making same-day discharge realistic for most uncomplicated cases. Specialty vein clinics, often physician-owned, bundle imaging, intervention and surveillance, offering a streamlined patient experience that appeals to cost-conscious insurers.
Regulatory frameworks in the United States provide facility fee parity that supports this shift. Other regions are watching closely, and as reimbursement aligns, the venous stents market will see a more balanced distribution between inpatient and outpatient venues. Device makers now tailor training and support specifically for ASC staff to accelerate adoption.
Geography Analysis
North America retained 38.72% of 2024 revenue thanks to mature reimbursement, extensive ASC networks and rapid uptake of newly approved stents. Dedicated registries and post-market studies reinforce safety, encouraging early use in complex disease. Multidisciplinary vascular teams integrate stenting into comprehensive care pathways, supporting procedure volumes across both hospital and outpatient settings.
Europe contributes substantial scientific output and follows standardized treatment algorithms laid out by the 2024 ESVS guidelines. Country-level reimbursement disparities, however, create uneven adoption. Germany and the United Kingdom spearhead clinical research, influencing neighboring markets. Brexit-related regulatory divergence introduces some approval uncertainty, yet demographic drivers and robust evidence maintain steady growth.
Asia-Pacific will post the fastest 11.46% CAGR as infrastructure improves and awareness rises. China’s insurance reforms and Japan’s aging demographic are key catalysts, though limited specialist density restrains some local uptake. International manufacturers are investing in physician education and localized production to navigate complex regulatory pathways. India and Southeast Asia represent longer-term opportunities once procedural capacity broadens.
Competitive Landscape
The venous stents market exhibits moderate concentration. Medtronic, Boston Scientific and Cook Medical leverage sizable R&D budgets and portfolio breadth to anchor share, buttressed by long-term trial data. Mid-cap specialists pursue differentiation through drug-eluting coatings and bioresorbable scaffolds, targeting physician segments focused on complex anatomy. Competitive focus is shifting from basic radial strength toward drug delivery performance, deployment precision and visibility enhancements.
Strategic collaborations between manufacturers and key opinion leaders generate real-world evidence that shapes reimbursement and guideline updates. Supply-chain resilience now features in competitive positioning following nitinol volatility. Boston Scientific’s double-digit 2025 venous revenue growth underscores the upside for firms with dedicated programs.
Looking ahead, market entrants emphasizing combination therapy and digital follow-up tools could disrupt incumbents, particularly in underserved pediatric or rare-anatomy niches. Nonetheless, incumbents’ regulatory expertise and global service networks remain significant barriers to rapid displacement.
Venous Stents Industry Leaders
-
Gore Medical
-
Cook Medical
-
Boston Scientific Corporation
-
Becton, Dickinson and Company
-
Medtronic Plc
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- January 2025: Stryker announced a definitive agreement to acquire Inari Medical for USD 4.9 billion, adding high-growth peripheral vascular solutions to its portfolio.
- June 2024: Philips completed the first implantation of its Duo Venous stent system, marking a commercial launch of dual-layer technology for complex obstructions
Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope
Market Definitions and Key Coverage
Our study defines the venous stent market as the global sales value of factory-finished, implantable metal or polymer tubes that are placed within lower-extremity or central veins to restore and maintain patency in chronic or acute obstructive disease. These devices are typically self-expanding nitinol systems delivered through a catheter and intended for permanent placement. According to Mordor Intelligence, the market is valued at about USD 1.28 billion in 2025.
Scope Exclusions: Coronary, peripheral arterial, non-vascular, and bioresorbable scaffold stents that are not indicated for venous use are excluded.
Segmentation Overview
- By Application
- Leg (Ilio-femoral)
- Pelvic
- Abdomen (IVC / Renal)
- Chest (SVC)
- Others
- By Disease
- Chronic Deep Vein Thrombosis
- Post-Thrombotic Syndrome
- Non-Thrombotic Iliac Vein Lesion / May-Thurner
- Acute DVT
- Others
- By Stent Type
- Self-expanding Nitinol Stents
- Balloon-expandable Stents
- Covered Stents
- Drug-eluting Stents
- Bioresorbable Scaffolds
- Others
- By Material
- Nitinol
- Elgiloy / Co-Cr Alloy
- Stainless Steel
- Polymer-based
- Others
- By End-user
- Hospitals
- Ambulatory Surgical Centres
- Specialty Vein Clinics
- Others
- By Geography
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Mexico
- Europe
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- France
- Italy
- Spain
- Rest of Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- China
- Japan
- India
- Australia
- South Korea
- Rest of Asia-Pacific
- Middle East and Africa
- GCC
- South Africa
- Rest of Middle East and Africa
- South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of South America
- North America
Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation
Primary Research
We interview interventional radiologists, vascular surgeons, cath-lab managers, and procurement leads across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Discussions validate average selling prices, split between dedicated venous and off-label arterial stents, procedure backlogs, and expected shifts after new device approvals. Follow-up surveys with hospital buyers clarify discount bands and inventory turns.
Desk Research
Mordor analysts begin with orderly desk work. We examine public databases such as the U.S. FDA 510(k) and MAUDE filings, the European EUDAMED portal, and the National Cardiovascular Data Registry for annual procedure volumes and complication alerts. Trade groups like the Society for Vascular Surgery, the American Venous Forum, and Europe's Union Internationale de Phlébologie publish prevalence surveys and consensus guidelines that clarify patient pools. Academic journals, for example, the Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, supply peer-reviewed evidence on adoption rates and long-term outcomes. Company 10-Ks, investor decks, and press releases provide shipment trends, while paid resources such as D&B Hoovers and Questel add revenue splits and patent momentum. This list is illustrative; many additional open and paid sources are screened for factual consistency before numbers enter our model.
Market-Sizing & Forecasting
A top-down prevalence-to-procedure framework anchors the model. We start with documented deep-vein thrombosis and post-thrombotic syndrome incidence, apply treatment eligibility ratios confirmed in clinician interviews, and multiply by average stents-per-case and weighted ASPs to reach 2025 revenue. Select bottom-up checks, supplier revenue roll-ups and sampled hospital usage audits, test the totals and trigger adjustments when gaps appear. Key variables include aging population share, imaging-guided diagnosis penetration, regulatory approvals per year, stent ASP erosion, and public payer reimbursement rates. Five-year forecasts rely on multivariate regression and scenario analysis that link the above drivers to historical growth patterns and expert consensus.
Data Validation & Update Cycle
Every iteration passes through anomaly checks, cross-team reviews, and variance tests against external procedure and trade datasets. Results refresh annually, with interim updates when approvals, safety alerts, or large acquisitions materially shift the outlook. Before release, an analyst reruns high-impact inputs to ensure buyers receive the most current view.
Why Mordor's Venous Stents Baseline Commands Reliability
Published market values differ widely because firms frame the space in distinct ways. Device mix, price assumptions, refresh timing, and currency choices each alter the headline.
Key gap drivers include whether iliac-only products or all peripheral venous stents are counted, if adjunct balloons or delivery kits are bundled, and how fast ASP compression is modeled for high-volume health systems. Some providers publish conservative one-time surveys, while Mordor revisits data annually and aligns every forecast with verified regulatory and claims feeds.
Benchmark comparison
| Market Size | Anonymized source | Primary gap driver |
|---|---|---|
| USD 1.28 B | Mordor Intelligence | - |
| USD 1.44 B | Regional Consultancy A | Includes hybrid graft-stent combinations and uses 2024 ASPs without erosion adjustment |
| USD 1.36 B | Global Consultancy B | Counts select peripheral arterial stents and assumes constant procedure growth across all regions |
The comparison shows that scope choices and price decay assumptions explain most variation. By triangulating clinical prevalence, real-world ASP movement, and manufacturer revenue checks, Mordor Intelligence delivers a balanced, transparent baseline that decision-makers can retrace and update with confidence.
Key Questions Answered in the Report
1. What is the current size of the venous stents market?
The market is valued at USD 1.28 billion in 2025 and is set to grow at an 8.05% CAGR to reach USD 1.89 billion by 2030.
2. Which application segment is expanding the fastest?
Pelvic venous interventions, driven by rising recognition of May-Thurner syndrome, are expected to grow at 12.46% CAGR through 2030.
Which is the fastest growing region in Global Venous Stents Market?
Asia-Pacific is estimated to grow at the highest CAGR over the forecast period (2025-2030).
3. How significant is North America in the venous stents market?
North America holds 38.72% revenue share, supported by favorable reimbursement and extensive ASC infrastructure.
4. Why are ambulatory surgical centers gaining market share?
ASCs offer same-day discharge, lower costs, and high patient satisfaction, leading to a projected 12.66% CAGR in this setting.
5. What is driving interest in drug-eluting venous stents?
Clinical evidence indicates reduced restenosis and improved long-term patency, fostering a 12.04% CAGR for these devices.
6. How are supply-chain risks being addressed?
Manufacturers are diversifying nitinol sourcing and investing in domestic processing to mitigate geopolitical uncertainties.
Page last updated on: