US Wound Care Management Devices Market Size and Share

US Wound Care Management Devices Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
View Global Report

US Wound Care Management Devices Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The US wound care management devices market grew to USD 7.59 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 9.93 billion by 2030, registering a 5.52% CAGR. Demand momentum reflects the convergence of an aging population, higher diabetes prevalence, and post-pandemic recovery in surgical volumes. Home-based treatment adoption, reimbursement incentives for telehealth visits, and payer scrutiny of avoidable readmissions are reshaping procurement decisions. Leading manufacturers are accelerating digital integration—remote monitoring, predictive analytics, and smart dressings—to align with value-based care targets. In parallel, consolidation among suppliers is unlocking scale advantages in sourcing, clinical education, and bundled product offerings.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By product type, wound care products held 67.23% of United States wound care management devices market share in 2024, while wound closure devices are expanding at a 5.98% CAGR through 2030.
  • By wound type, chronic wounds accounted for 59.33% share of the United States wound care management devices market size in 2024; acute wounds are rising at a 6.12% CAGR.
  • By end user, hospitals and specialty clinics retained a 48.41% share in 2024, whereas home healthcare settings are advancing at a 6.44% CAGR.
  • By mode of purchase, institutional procurement contributed 67.29% revenue in 2024; retail and over-the-counter channels show the fastest 6.56% CAGR.

Segment Analysis

By Product: Device Innovation Drives Market Differentiation

The United States wound care management devices market share favored wound care products at 67.23% in 2024. Foam and hydrocolloid dressings have displaced traditional gauze due to better moisture control, extended wear, and decreased nursing workload. Antimicrobial agents embedded in dressings target biofilm formation without frequent changes, while flexible printed sensors capture pH, temperature, and exudate volume for real-time feedback.

Wound closure devices, though smaller in base revenue, are advancing at 5.98% CAGR. Tissue adhesives, absorbable strips, and sprayable sealants are gaining traction among surgeons who value faster application and improved cosmesis. Smart staplers equipped with compression sensors provide intraoperative guidance that lowers leak rates. Increasing bariatric and orthopedic volumes support demand for bio-active patches that combine hemostasis with infection suppression.

US Wound Care management Devices Market: Market Share by Product
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Wound Type: Managing Complexity in Chronic and Acute Lesions

Chronic wounds retained 59.33% of the United States wound care management devices market share in 2024. Diabetic foot ulcers and pressure ulcers [1]Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, "Application of Bioengineered Skin Substitutes to Lower Extremity Chronic Non-Healing Wounds," cms.gov consume the largest share of Medicare spending, driving adoption of off-loading devices, NPWT, and skin substitutes that expedite closure. AI-driven imaging tools achieve expert-level accuracy in predicting healing trajectories, enabling earlier therapy escalation [2]California Institute of Technology, "Smart Bandage Clears New Hurdle: Monitors Chronic Wounds in Human Patients," caltech.edu.

Acute wounds are expanding at a 6.12% CAGR as elective surgeries rebound and trauma care protocols intensify infection control. The United States wound care management devices market size for acute applications is poised to benefit from bio-resorbable sealants and negative-pressure dressings that shorten hospital stays. Burns constitute a niche segment where advanced dermal matrices like AVITA’s Cohealyx support scar minimization and rapid re-epithelialization.

By End User: Home Healthcare Transformation Accelerates Growth

Hospitals and dedicated wound clinics held 48.41% revenue share in 2024. Specialized centers report healing rates of 66.8%, attributable to multidisciplinary care teams and ready access to adjunctive modalities. Facilities that adopt integrated data dashboards reduce time-to-closure by tracking wound surface area, tissue type, and exudate trends.

Home settings represent the fastest 6.44% CAGR channel through 2030. Remote monitoring platforms transmit photos and sensor data to nurses who titrate dressings without in-person visits, decreasing skilled nursing utilization by double-digit percentages. The United States wound care management devices market size for home use will be reinforced by CMS billing codes G0541-G0543, which reimburse caregiver tele-training.

US Wound Care management Devices Market: Market Share by End User
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Mode of Purchase: Institutional Contracts Face Retail Disruption

Institutional purchasing produced 67.29% of 2024 revenue. Hospitals rely on group purchasing organizations to negotiate tiered pricing and value-based clauses requiring suppliers to present readmission reduction data. Bundled payment pilots reward device bundles that compress the average length of stay for pressure ulcer cases.

Retail and OTC channels will grow quickest at 6.56% CAGR as patients self-manage lower-grade ulcers between clinic visits. Pharmacy chains expand wound care aisles to include foam dressings, alginate pads, and silver sprays previously limited to hospital supply. Direct-to-consumer e-commerce models ship personalized dressing kits accompanied by smartphone apps that remind users to change products and submit images for clinician review.

Geography Analysis

Regional demand aligns closely with demographic patterns and healthcare infrastructure density. The Northeast and West Coast account for the earliest adoption of sensor-enabled dressings and AI imaging because of higher physician specialist density and proximity to device R&D hubs. Academic medical centers in Boston, New York, and Los Angeles serve as reference sites for clinical trials, accelerating commercial uptake.

The Southeast and Southwest deliver the largest chronic wound volumes, catalyzed by elevated diabetes incidence. Texas and Florida combine large Medicare populations with robust outpatient clinic networks that generate steady sales of NPWT consumables. California, while boasting advanced care capabilities, also faces a burden from diverse socioeconomic groups, stimulating interest in low-cost smart dressings backed by tele-coaching.

Rural counties nationwide struggle with specialist shortages, prompting telehealth adoption rates that surpass urban averages. Portable imaging kits and AI-assisted decision support enable primary care physicians to triage and manage ulcers effectively. State Medicaid expansion status introduces reimbursement variability, but the CY 2025 Medicare final rule extends telehealth coverage for caregiver education, which is expected to narrow access gaps.

Competitive Landscape

The United States wound care management devices market is fragmented. Companies offer portfolios spanning advanced dressings, NPWT, closure devices, and digital platforms, enabling hospitals to streamline sourcing under bundled contracts. Smith+Nephew recently secured a USD 75 million Department of Defense award for advanced therapy systems, underscoring traction in complex wound indications.

Strategic M&A continues: Medline purchased Ecolab's surgical offerings for nearly USD 1 billion to deepen vertical integration. Coloplast acquired fish-skin graft innovator Kerecis to enter biologic matrices. Emerging entrants leverage precision sensors, electrical stimulation, and plasma therapy to carve niches. Swift Medical's platform has logged more than 50 million assessments, providing anonymized datasets that inform algorithmic product refinement.

Digital capabilities differentiate competitors as payers reward documented healing acceleration. [3]North Carolina State University. "Electric bandage holds promise for treating chronic wounds." ScienceDaily, sciencedaily.com Solventum's V.A.C. Peel and Place reduces application time to two minutes, addressing nursing labor shortages. Electric bandage prototypes at Science Daily demonstrate 30% faster closure, and cold atmospheric plasma devices target resistant biofilms. Genomic and microbiome-based personalization pipelines are emerging frontiers that may disrupt standard dressing paradigms over the next decade. 

US Wound Care Management Devices Industry Leaders

  1. ConvaTec Group PLC

  2. Smith & Nephew

  3. Medtronic

  4. Solventum

  5. Coloplast

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
US Wound Care Management Devices Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • May 2025: Smith+Nephew awarded a USD 75 million Department of Defense contract to supply advanced wound therapy systems HIT Consultant.
  • April 2025: California Institute of Technology researchers published iCares smart bandage results in Science Translational Medicine, validating real-time biomarker monitoring.
  • April 2025: AVITA Medical launched Cohealyx, a collagen dermal matrix co-developed with Regenity Biosciences.
  • July 2024: AOTI’s NEXA NPWT system received expanded 510(k) clearance for acute, extended and home care settings.

Table of Contents for US Wound Care Management Devices Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Increasing incidence of chronic & diabetic wounds
    • 4.2.2 Growing volume of surgical procedures
    • 4.2.3 Rising geriatric population base
    • 4.2.4 Rapid adoption of advanced therapies such as NPWT and skin substitutes
    • 4.2.5 Reimbursement-linked telehealth & smart dressing deployment
    • 4.2.6 Rising hospital-acquired wound cases and infection control mandates
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Stringent FDA regulations & CMS coding hurdles
    • 4.3.2 High total cost of care and device pricing
    • 4.3.3 Heightened payer scrutiny of skin substitutes
    • 4.3.4 Shortage of certified wound-care specialists
  • 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.5 Technological Outlook
  • 4.6 Porters Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.6.1 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.6.2 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.6.3 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.6.4 Threat of Substitute Products
    • 4.6.5 Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

  • 5.1 By Product
    • 5.1.1 Wound Care
    • 5.1.1.1 Dressings
    • 5.1.1.1.1 Traditional Gauze & Tape Dressings
    • 5.1.1.1.2 Advanced Dressings
    • 5.1.1.2 Wound-Care Devices
    • 5.1.1.2.1 Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT)
    • 5.1.1.2.2 Oxygen & Hyperbaric Systems
    • 5.1.1.2.3 Electrical Stimulation Devices
    • 5.1.1.2.4 Other Wound Care Devices
    • 5.1.1.3 Other Wound Care Products
    • 5.1.2 Wound Closure
    • 5.1.2.1 Sutures
    • 5.1.2.2 Surgical Staplers
    • 5.1.2.3 Tissue Adhesives, Strips, Sealants & Glues
  • 5.2 By Wound Type
    • 5.2.1 Chronic Wounds
    • 5.2.1.1 Diabetic Foot Ulcer
    • 5.2.1.2 Pressure Ulcer
    • 5.2.1.3 Venous Leg Ulcer
    • 5.2.1.4 Other Chronic Wounds
    • 5.2.2 Acute Wounds
    • 5.2.2.1 Surgical/Traumatic Wounds
    • 5.2.2.2 Burns
    • 5.2.2.3 Other Acute Wounds
  • 5.3 By End User
    • 5.3.1 Hospitals & Specialty Wound Clinics
    • 5.3.2 Long-term Care Facilities
    • 5.3.3 Home-Healthcare Settings
  • 5.4 By Mode of Purchase
    • 5.4.1 Institutional Procurement
    • 5.4.2 Retail / OTC Channel

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration Analysis
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Market Rank/Share for key companies, Products & Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Solventum
    • 6.3.2 Smith & Nephew
    • 6.3.3 Johnson & Johnson
    • 6.3.4 ConvaTec Group
    • 6.3.5 Medtronic
    • 6.3.6 B. Braun SE
    • 6.3.7 Cardinal Health
    • 6.3.8 Coloplast
    • 6.3.9 Molnlycke Health Care
    • 6.3.10 Integra LifeSciences
    • 6.3.11 Organogenesis
    • 6.3.12 Teleflex
    • 6.3.13 Urgo Medical
    • 6.3.14 Hollister Incorporated
    • 6.3.15 Medline Industries
    • 6.3.16 Zimmer Biomet
    • 6.3.17 MiMedx Group
    • 6.3.18 Essity Medical
    • 6.3.19 AVITA Medical, Inc.
    • 6.3.20 Hartmann Group

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space & Unmet-need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the United States wound-care management devices market as all physician-directed devices and advanced dressings, negative-pressure systems, oxygen or electrical stimulation units, tissue adhesives, surgical staplers, and bio-engineered dressings sold for treating acute or chronic wounds across clinical and home-health settings.

Scope exclusion: OTC first-aid strips and commodity gauze not used under clinical supervision are outside this analysis.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Product
    • Wound Care
      • Dressings
        • Traditional Gauze & Tape Dressings
        • Advanced Dressings
      • Wound-Care Devices
        • Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT)
        • Oxygen & Hyperbaric Systems
        • Electrical Stimulation Devices
        • Other Wound Care Devices
      • Other Wound Care Products
    • Wound Closure
      • Sutures
      • Surgical Staplers
      • Tissue Adhesives, Strips, Sealants & Glues
  • By Wound Type
    • Chronic Wounds
      • Diabetic Foot Ulcer
      • Pressure Ulcer
      • Venous Leg Ulcer
      • Other Chronic Wounds
    • Acute Wounds
      • Surgical/Traumatic Wounds
      • Burns
      • Other Acute Wounds
  • By End User
    • Hospitals & Specialty Wound Clinics
    • Long-term Care Facilities
    • Home-Healthcare Settings
  • By Mode of Purchase
    • Institutional Procurement
    • Retail / OTC Channel

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Mordor analysts interviewed US wound-care nurses, purchasing managers at multi-state hospital chains, and product managers at device OEMs from the Midwest, Northeast, and Sunbelt regions. Insights on typical daily-use rates, average selling prices, and adoption barriers calibrated incidence-based models and verified secondary assumptions.

Desk Research

We extracted shipment values, unit imports, and tariff codes from sources such as the US International Trade Commission, CMS Durable Medical Equipment fee schedules, and FDA 510(k)/PMA databases. We then reviewed prevalence data from CDC's National Diabetes Statistics Report and AHRQ's HCUP surgical discharge files. Industry trends were followed through peer-reviewed journals (​_Advances in Wound Care_​) and major associations such as the American College of Wound Healing. Subscription tools, including D&B Hoovers for company revenues and Dow Jones Factiva for deal news, helped benchmark leading suppliers. This list is illustrative; many additional open and paid sources informed desk validation.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

The core model begins with a top-down reconstruction of national spending. Medicare and private-payer outlays for wound therapy devices were aligned with CDC ulcer incidence and AHRQ surgical volumes, which are then multiplied by therapy utilization ratios and blended ASPs. Bottom-up checks, sampled supplier revenues and retail channel audits, tempered totals before sign-off. Key levers include diabetes prevalence, ambulatory surgery volumes, smart-dressings penetration, unit replacement cycles, reimbursement fee revisions, and average therapy duration. Forecasts to 2030 rely on multivariate regression of these drivers plus scenario analysis for reimbursement shifts, producing our 5.5% CAGR outlook. Data gaps (e.g., private clinic sales) were bridged by applying validated hospital-to-clinic spend ratios derived from interviews.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs face variance checks versus historical CMS spend, customs values, and disclosed OEM revenues; anomalies trigger re-interview or source re-runs. Two analyst reviews precede publication. Reports refresh annually, with interim updates when regulatory or recall events materially alter demand.

Why Our US Wound Care Management Baseline Commands Reliability

Published estimates often diverge because firms pick different product baskets, patient cohorts, or update cadences.

Key gap drivers here include: some studies blend commodity bandages with devices, others apply global ASPs to U.S. volumes, and several project aggressive uptake of bio-engineered tissues that experts we spoke to still view as niche. Mordor's scope mirrors FDA device codes, our base year is fully refreshed (CY 2024 claims), and currency effects are neutralized by constant-USD treatment.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 7.59 B (2025) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 8.97 B (2024) Global Consultancy A includes OTC dressings and traditional consumables
USD 5.21 B (2023) Trade Journal B excludes negative-pressure therapy and electrical stimulation devices

These comparisons show that when scope and input fidelity vary, values swing widely. Mordor's disciplined device-only lens, recent claims base, and dual-path validation provide a balanced, transparent baseline decision-makers can rely on.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current United States wound care management devices market size?

The market reached USD 7.59 billion in 2025.

How fast will the United States wound care management devices market grow?

It is projected to expand at a 5.52% CAGR, hitting USD 9.93 billion by 2030.

Which product segment is growing quickest?

Wound closure devices are increasing at a 5.98% CAGR through 2030, driven by tissue adhesives and bio-active patches.

Why is home healthcare adoption accelerating?

New Medicare billing codes reimburse telehealth caregiver training, and patients prefer recovery at home, supporting a 6.44% CAGR for the segment.

How are digital technologies influencing market competition?

AI-enabled imaging, smart sensors and remote monitoring platforms differentiate suppliers by proving faster healing and fewer readmissions.

What regulatory shifts should device manufacturers monitor?

The FDA’s proposed reclassification of antimicrobial dressings and the 2026 Quality System Regulation alignment with ISO 13485 will raise compliance requirements.

Page last updated on:

US Wound Care Management Devices Market Report Snapshots