United States Mammography Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The United States mammography market size is USD 1.15 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 1.80 billion by 2030, advancing at a 9.39% CAGR. Sustained growth reflects the interaction of federal policy, rapid technology upgrades, and demographic pressures that increase screening demand well beyond basic equipment‐replacement cycles. Artificial intelligence (AI) adoption shortens reading times, lifts detection sensitivity, and creates a compelling return on investment that encourages faster system turnover. Meanwhile, the lower screening age of 40 years expands the eligible female population by nearly 20 million, requiring additional imaging capacity and mobile outreach services. Heightened reimbursement for 3-D tomosynthesis narrows cost gaps and accelerates the migration from 2-D systems, while density notification laws in 38 states prompt providers to adopt premium modalities capable of imaging fibroglandular tissue. Consolidation among imaging centers and vertical acquisition of AI developers further scales deployment of advanced platforms and unifies data for algorithm training.
Key Report Takeaways
- By product type, digital systems accounted for 61.24% of the United States' mammography market share in 2024.
- 3-D breast tomosynthesis systems are forecast to expand at a 10.11% CAGR through 2030.
- By technology, 2-D full-field digital mammography accounted for 50.93% of the market size in 2024, while photon-counting digital mammography is projected to grow at a 10.34% CAGR through 2030.
- By application, screening captured 72.85% of 2024 revenue, whereas interventional stereo-biopsy is advancing at a 10.41% CAGR through 2030.
- By end user, hospitals accounted for 44.76% of the revenue in 2024; however, diagnostic imaging centers are projected to grow at a 9.84% CAGR to 2030.
United States Mammography Market Trends and Insights
Drivers Impact Analysis
| Driver | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growing Burden Of Breast Cancer | +1.5% | National, with higher impact in densely populated states | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Federal Reimbursement For 3-D Tomosynthesis | +1.8% | National, accelerated in Medicare-heavy regions | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Rapid Technology Upgrades | +1.2% | National, concentrated in urban imaging centers | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Expansion Of Breast Density-Notification Laws | +0.9% | State-specific, with 38 states currently mandating | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| AI-Enabled Triage & Workflow Automation | +1.4% | National, prioritized by large imaging chains | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Rise Of Mobile Outreach Vans In Rural U.S. | +0.8% | Rural and underserved urban areas | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Growing Burden of Breast Cancer
The incidence among women aged 40-49 years rose 2% annually from 2015 to 2019, prompting the USPSTF to lower the screening age to 40 years [1]US Preventive Services Task Force, “Screening for Breast Cancer,” JAMA, jamanetwork.com. The decision instantly widened the United States mammography market by roughly 20 million newly eligible women and increased demand on facilities already contending with radiologist shortages. Mortality among Black women remains 40% higher than that of White women, spurring inner-city programs to adopt contrast-enhanced mammography that delivers 88.9% sensitivity versus 27.8% for standard 2-D imaging. Workforce gaps estimated at 1,400 unfilled fellowship positions intensify reliance on AI decision support to maintain throughput. Dense breast tissue in up to half of women over 40 strengthens the case for tomosynthesis and photon-counting systems that reveal occult lesions. Together, these epidemiological pressures elevate capital expenditure and reinforce the long-run momentum of the United States mammography market.
Federal Reimbursement for 3-D Tomosynthesis
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) instituted national coverage for digital breast tomosynthesis, eliminating the historical USD 50–80 out-of-pocket differential that had suppressed uptake [2]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Update to Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines,” cdc.gov . Commercial insurers quickly mirrored CMS, and today, 95% of privately insured members can access 3-D exams without prior authorization. Parity coincides with compelling clinical proof: DBT lowers callback rates by 41% and improves cancer detection by 29%. Revenue visibility accelerates the replacement of legacy 2-D units, shortening equipment lifecycles from 9 years to nearer 6 years. Providers serving Medicare-dominant catchments in Florida, Arizona, and Pennsylvania are upgrading first, creating a ripple effect that extends to second-tier markets, which are seeking competitive parity.
Rapid Technology Upgrades
FDA clearance of Clairity Breast in June 2025 introduced risk-prediction software that stratifies five-year cancer probability from a single mammogram. Photon-counting detectors promise 100-fold resolution improvement and 30–40% lower dose compared with current digital systems. The SCEMAM trial confirmed that contrast-enhanced mammography detects 10 additional cancers per 1,000 women versus 2-D imaging. Equipment makers bundle these innovations with AI-guided positioning and automated quality checks, shrinking exam time and freeing capacity. Siemens’ MAMMOMAT B.brilliant achieves 5-second 3-D capture, erasing motion artifacts. Collective gains motivate faster fleet turnover, and incremental spending is a key pillar of the United States mammography market expansion.
Expansion of Breast Density-Notification Laws
Mandated density disclosure in 38 states increases administrative workload and legal exposure for facilities that fail to advise women of supplemental options. Final FDA rules, effective September 2024, standardize language nationwide, permitting multi-state health systems to craft uniform protocols. Dense tissue prevalence of 40–50% among screened women channels demand toward tomosynthesis, automated breast ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced mammography. Hospitals upgrade to avoid malpractice liability that has averaged USD 1 million per missed dense-tissue cancer. Vendors highlight dose-reduced 3-D acquisitions, reassuring clinicians who balance image quality with safety.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraint | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Radiation-Dose Safety Concerns | -1.1% | National, heightened in pediatric-adjacent facilities | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| High Capital & Service Costs Of DBT Units | -0.7% | Rural and independent imaging centers | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Shortage Of Fellowship-Trained Breast Radiologists | -1.3% | National, acute in rural and secondary markets | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Consolidation Of Imaging Centers Delaying Purchases | -0.9% | Metropolitan areas with high PE activity | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Radiation-Dose Safety Concerns
DBT exposes patients to 15–25% higher dose than 2-D exams, with a mean glandular dose at 2.04–2.33 mGy versus 1.40–1.89 mGy for FFDM. Patient advocates amplify concerns about cumulative exposure, especially for the newly included 40-year-old cohort, who face decades of annual screening. FDA MQSA inspectors flag dose violations more frequently as facilities increase exam volumes. Manufacturers counter with AI-enhanced reconstruction and photon-counting detectors that deliver sub-2 mGy performance, yet lingering perceptions hinder rapid adoption in children’s hospitals and family clinics. Dose anxiety marginally tempers the United States mammography market, although technology improvements are steadily narrowing the gap.
High Capital & Service Costs of DBT Units
Tomosynthesis platforms range from USD 200,000 to USD 275,000, nearly double the cost of an entry-level digital system. Annual service contracts reach USD 41,500, straining cash flows for rural hospitals that process fewer than 1,200 screens per year. Financing obstacles lead some independents to defer purchases until consolidation resolves, fueling reliance on vendor leasing schemes or mobile vans. Non-profit outreach fleets now bridge the rural gap, but the economic hurdle still slows full penetration of 3-D systems, moderating near-term acceleration of the United States mammography market.
Segment Analysis
By Product Type: Digital Systems Lead Market Evolution
Digital equipment captured 61.24% of the market in 2024, mirroring the near-complete exit of film units. Yet replacement momentum is shifting toward 3-D tomosynthesis, projected to advance at 10.11% CAGR through 2030 as payers equalize reimbursement and clinical evidence grows. Analog systems primarily remain in isolated clinics; retrofit kits prolong function but steadily lose relevance as regulatory pressure intensifies. Premium contrast-enhanced platforms, validated by SCEMAM, open a differentiated lane for tertiary centers seeking diagnostic superiority. Overall, rising preference for volumetric and contrast imaging is driving growth in the United States mammography market.
The value proposition of digital upgrades combines image clarity, workflow automation, and AI analytics, which reduce reading time by 30–40%. Providers view premium packages as not simple replacements, but rather as competitive assets that attract referrals and justify higher technical fees. As mobile fleets modernize their onboard suites, digital manufacturers enlarge after-market revenues for software licenses and detector swaps, further deepening the United States mammography market.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Technology: AI Integration Transforms 2-D Digital Dominance
Full-field digital retains 50.93% share, but photon-counting detectors headline innovation because they pair ultra-high resolution with reduced exposure. Early adopters report sharper microcalcification visualization, translating to fewer false negatives and lower recall rates. AI-guided CAD and triage algorithms, such as ProFound Detection 4.0, reduce reading time and enhance specificity, collectively increasing the adoption of AI in the United States' mammography market for technology upgrades.
3-D tomosynthesis gains reimbursement traction, while Clairity Breast's predictive capability signals a future shift from detection to risk-stratified screening. Vendors embed smart-worklist features that auto-route complex cases to fellowship specialists, easing the radiologist shortage. Integration of cloud deployment secures scalability for multisite chains, underscoring how software differentiation now defines competitive positioning in the United States mammography market.
By Application: Screening Dominance Faces Interventional Growth
Screening accounted for 72.85% of the volume in 2024, as demographic expansion and guideline revisions funnelled millions more women into annual exams. Yet, interventional stereobiopsy, driven by increased detection rates and precision guidance, is growing at a 10.41% CAGR. Hospitals integrate same-day biopsy with screening to limit patient drop-off, expanding per-visit revenue and raising the overall United States mammography market size, attributed to value-added procedures.
AI-driven lesion characterization reduces unnecessary biopsies, creating goodwill among patients and insurers while improving capacity utilization. Mobile vans are increasingly delivering both screening and ultrasound triage on board, thereby augmenting access in rural counties. This service model anchors incremental demand and diversifies revenue streams, illustrating how the evolving care pathway reinforces resilience in the United States mammography market.
By End User: Hospital Dominance Challenged by Imaging Center Consolidation
Hospitals generated 44.76% of their revenue in 2024 due to the implementation of integrated oncology pathways and budget latitude. Nonetheless, private-equity-backed diagnostic imaging centers expand at a 9.84% CAGR, leveraging centralized AI hubs to pool sub-specialist reads and capture spillover from overloaded hospital systems. Their cost-effective footprint resonates with patients who prefer shorter wait times, thereby strengthening their role within the industry.
Ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) are further disrupted by bundling screening, biopsy, and outpatient lumpectomy under one roof, shortening care cycles. Rural regions rely on mobile suites operated by academic health systems, such as UC Davis, to improve equity while increasing throughput in the broader United States mammography market. Collectively, shifting site-of-service trends reshape vendor sales channels and service revenue distribution.
Geography Analysis
Regional dynamics illustrate how demographic density, policy adoption, and provider consolidation guide equipment allocation. Coastal states, including California, New York, and Texas, exhibit the deepest capital pools, installing photon-counting and contrast-enhanced systems ahead of reimbursement codes. Higher average reimbursements in these states drive market growth.
The density-notification rollout produces uneven supplemental-screening demand; states with early mandates, such as Connecticut and New York, exhibit higher 3-D adoption, whereas late-adopter states continue to transition. Private equity concentration clusters in metropolitan corridors, accelerates technology refresh, and drives the market share of chain operators. Future growth hinges on harmonizing policy with capacity expansion, enabling underserved zones to rise toward parity.
Competitive Landscape
Key equipment makers, such as Hologic, GE HealthCare, and Siemens Healthineers, anchor the hardware supply; yet, differentiation increasingly flows from AI software ecosystems. Hologic’s Genius AI Detection integrates seamlessly into its 3D workflow, offering a 40% reduction in reading time that solidifies upgrade intent. GE HealthCare collaborates with RadNet to co-develop SmartTechnology algorithms embedded across 400 centers [3]DeepHealth, “GE HealthCare and RadNet Collaboration,” deephealth.com. Siemens advances detector innovation with its 5-second 3D Mammomat B.brilliant, emphasizing dose efficiency.
Vertical integration intensifies as service chains acquire software vendors; RadNet’s USD 103 million purchase of iCAD merges 17% of the United States radiology practices under a shared AI umbrella, consolidating data and negotiating leverage. AI pure-plays, such as Volpara and ScreenPoint, align with imaging groups to integrate risk models into daily operations. This software-hardware fusion drives recurring license revenue and raises switching costs, embedding AI dynamics firmly in the United States mammography market.
United States Mammography Industry Leaders
-
Siemens AG
-
GE Healthcare
-
Koninklijke Philips N.V.
-
Fujifilm Holdings Corporation
-
Hologic, Inc.
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- June 2025: The United States FDA granted De Novo authorization to Clairity Breast, the first AI tool to predict five-year risk from a screening mammogram.
- May 2025: RadNet completed its acquisition of iCAD, integrating AI algorithms into 600,000 annual mammograms.
- April 2025: Hologic unveiled the results of the Genius AI Detection 2.0 study, demonstrating the detection of cancers that radiologists had missed.
- January 2025: GRACE Breast Imaging installed Siemens’ Mammomat B.brilliant, becoming the first site in the United States to deploy the redesigned 3-D platform.
United States Mammography Market Report Scope
According to the report's scope, mammography refers to a standard diagnostic and screening technique used to examine breast tissue for the presence of a malignant tumor. The process utilizes low-energy X-rays for the early detection of breast cancer. The United States Mammography Market is segmented by Product Type (Digital Systems, Analog Systems, Breast Tomosynthesis, and Other Product Types), End Users (Hospitals, Specialty Clinics, and Diagnostic Centers). The report offers the value (in USD million) for the above segments.
| Digital Systems |
| 3-D Breast Tomosynthesis Systems |
| Analog Systems |
| Computed-Radiography Retrofit Kits |
| Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Systems |
| 2-D Full-field Digital |
| 3-D / Tomosynthesis |
| Photon-Counting Digital |
| AI-enabled CAD & Image-triage |
| Screening |
| Diagnostic |
| Hospitals |
| Diagnostic Imaging Centers |
| Ambulatory Surgical Centers |
| Others |
| By Product Type | Digital Systems |
| 3-D Breast Tomosynthesis Systems | |
| Analog Systems | |
| Computed-Radiography Retrofit Kits | |
| Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Systems | |
| By Technology | 2-D Full-field Digital |
| 3-D / Tomosynthesis | |
| Photon-Counting Digital | |
| AI-enabled CAD & Image-triage | |
| By Application | Screening |
| Diagnostic | |
| By End User | Hospitals |
| Diagnostic Imaging Centers | |
| Ambulatory Surgical Centers | |
| Others |
Key Questions Answered in the Report
How big is the United States Mammography Market?
The United States Mammography Market size is expected to reach USD 1.15 billion in 2025 and grow at a CAGR of 9.39% to reach USD 1.80 billion by 2030.
Which imaging modality is expanding fastest in the United States?
3-D breast tomosynthesis systems lead growth with a projected 10.11% CAGR through 2030, helped by full Medicare reimbursement and stronger clinical outcomes.
Who are the key players in United States Mammography Market?
Siemens AG, GE Healthcare, Koninklijke Philips N.V., Fujifilm Holdings Corporation and Hologic, Inc. are the major companies operating in the United States Mammography Market.
How did the new USPSTF guidance affect screening demand?
Lowering the start age to 40 years added almost 20 million eligible women, boosting annual screening volume and accelerating equipment upgrades.
Page last updated on: