Nasal Polyps Treatment Market Size and Share

Nasal Polyps Treatment Market (2025 - 2030)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Nasal Polyps Treatment Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The nasal polyps treatment market size is valued at USD 3.99 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 5.44 billion by 2030, advancing at a 6.41% CAGR. Demand is rising as physicians shift from broad corticosteroid use toward precision biologics that interrupt interleukin-4, -5 and -13 signaling pathways. Growth is reinforced by the high coexistence of asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), the expansion of fast-track biologic approvals, and steady uptake of minimally invasive delivery systems that improve intranasal drug deposition. Competition intensifies as large pharmaceutical groups protect market positions through life-cycle management and co-promotion agreements, while smaller biotechnology companies target under-served patient segments through differentiated mechanisms of action. Digital pharmacy channels, broader ENT specialist networks, and favorable reimbursement pilots in developed markets further expand patient access, although cost containment policies in price-sensitive regions remain a headwind.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By drug class, corticosteroids led with 42.34% of the nasal polyps treatment market share in 2024, while the biologics-dominated “Other Drug Class” segment is projected to expand at an 8.54% CAGR through 2030.
  • By route of administration, nasal sprays commanded 48.43% revenue share in 2024; exhalation delivery systems are forecast to grow at an 8.66% CAGR over the same period.
  • By distribution channel, hospital pharmacies held 46.56% share of the nasal polyps treatment market size in 2024, whereas online pharmacies are set to rise at a 9.34% CAGR to 2030.
  • By end user, hospitals accounted for 51.23% share in 2024, with ENT clinics advancing at a 9.56% CAGR on the back of specialized diagnostics.
  • By geography, North America contributed 42.45% market share in 2024, while Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region at a 7.45% CAGR through 2030.

Segment Analysis

By Drug Class: Biologics Drive Premium Segment Growth

Corticosteroids retained 42.34% share of the nasal polyps treatment market in 2024 on the back of favorable pricing and wide prescriber familiarity. Yet biologic therapies within the “Other Drug Class” bracket are expanding at an 8.54% CAGR, propelled by robust real-world effectiveness and multi-cohort label extensions. Antibiotic usage is falling as mechanistic focus shifts from infectious to type 2 inflammatory drivers. Leukotriene modifiers remain niche, serving patients with comorbid asthma yet limited standalone benefit in polyp regression.

The competitive tide is evident in hospital formularies, where biologic utilization in high-surgery-risk cohorts is rising quarter-on-quarter. Dupilumab’s adolescent indication, tezepelumab’s near-approval status, and China’s stapokibart launch intensify attention on disease-modifying results that reduce revision surgeries and cumulative systemic steroid exposure. Payer scrutiny is tightening but long-term cost offsets from fewer operating-room episodes and productivity gains strengthen the biologic value narrative. Post-2028 biosimilar waves should gradually unlock fuller access while sustaining innovation incentives for next-generation cytokine targets.

Nasal Polyps Treatment Market: Market Share by Drug Class
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By Route of Administration: Targeted Delivery Systems Gain Traction

Nasal sprays delivered 48.43% revenue share in 2024, benefiting from patient-friendly formats and over-the-counter steroid options that manage mild-to-moderate symptoms. Exhalation delivery systems, led by XHANCE’s closed-palate mechanism, are on track for an 8.66% CAGR by 2030 as studies confirm deeper sinus penetration and better polyp shrinkage scores. Oral and injectable routes remain relevant for systemic treatments, especially during acute exacerbations or for biologic dosing every 2–8 weeks. Implantable devices, exemplified by SINUVA and LATERA, occupy an early-adopter niche awaiting further long-term safety data.

Emerging solutions combine handheld battery-assisted atomizers with sensors that log dosing compliance to cloud portals, supporting remote physician oversight. Stryker’s LATERA absorbable implant reportedly saves USD 2,200 per patient compared with functional endoscopic sinus surgery in suitable lateral wall collapse cases. Uptake of such implants remains country-specific, hinging on specialist skill sets and reimbursement scheduling. As device makers refine ergonomics and integrate digital guidance, payers may favor these technologies for their potential to lower intensive surgical episodes.

By Distribution Channel: Digital Transformation Accelerates Online Growth

Hospital pharmacies represented 46.56% of the nasal polyps treatment market size in 2024, reflecting centralized biologic inventories, cold-chain controls, and immediate post-infusion monitoring services. Online pharmacies are growing at a 9.34% CAGR, underpinned by e-prescription laws and patient expectations for doorstep specialty medication delivery with adherence apps. Retail chains hold steady volumes via intranasal sprays, while specialty clinics increasingly manage biologic dispensing under coordinated care agreements.

Health systems integrate tele-ENT consultation portals, enabling remote diagnosis, e-consult coding, and synchronized pharmacy shipments, especially across rural catchments in Asia-Pacific. National regulators now allow electronic prior authorizations and temperature-controlled courier models, sustaining biological integrity to the patient’s refrigerator. Pharmacy benefit managers expand nurse-navigator programs for biologic titration, supporting home-administration paradigms that lower infusion-center overheads and broaden regional reach.

Nasal Polyps Treatment Market: Market Share by Distribution Channel
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Detailed Market Forecasts at the Most Granular Levels
Download PDF

By End User: ENT Clinics Emerge as Specialized Care Centers

Hospitals accounted for 51.23% revenue share in 2024, backed by superior imaging suites, integrated surgical theaters, and multidisciplinary allergy-pulmonology collaboration. ENT clinics are the fastest, at a 9.56% CAGR, as high-definition endoscopes, cone-beam CT scanners, and biologic inventory financing give single-specialty centers comparable capabilities at lower fixed-cost bases. Ambulatory surgery centers add volume for less complex procedures, such as polypectomy with balloon sinuplasty, while home care garners interest for biologic maintenance in stable patients.

The Global Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Initiative’s equipment minimums empower emerging-market clinics to perform reliable diagnostics, thereby capturing patient loyalty[3]PubMed, “Global Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Initiative: Core Equipment,” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. AI-driven decision-support platforms filter endoscopic images to grade polyp severity and recommend evidence-based treatment plans, raising clinic throughput. Pay-for-performance models tie reimbursement to patient-reported outcomes, rewarding centers that minimize repeat surgeries and systemic steroid bursts, thus favoring specialized ENT environments.

Geography Analysis

North America led the nasal polyps treatment market in 2024 with 42.45% share, underpinned by strong prescribing of FDA-cleared biologics, widespread insurance coverage for specialty drugs, and active patient advocacy groups that facilitate early diagnosis. The United States accounts for the bulk of regional revenue, leveraging real-time benefits checks and manufacturer copay programs that offset high list prices. Canada’s provincial drug plans steadily add biologics to formularies following health-technology assessments, while Mexico’s growing private insurance pool is accelerating corticosteroid spray and balloon sinuplasty uptake. Ongoing payer negotiations create heterogeneous access, yet steady commercial uptake has cemented the region’s leadership.

Europe shows balanced growth, supported by centralized EMA reviews that streamline multinational launches. Germany and the United Kingdom anchor clinical research networks and employ stringent cost-effectiveness thresholds, accelerating tender competition and risk-sharing contracts for biologic reimbursement. France and Italy benefit from specialist training programs and universal coverage, keeping surgery queues short and biologic adoption steady. Spain, with upgraded tertiary ENT hubs and improving macroeconomics, is emerging as a significant volume contributor. EU aging demographics and stringent workplace wellness mandates sustain long-term demand.

Asia-Pacific is projected to achieve the fastest 7.45% CAGR through 2030 as healthcare spending expands, infrastructure modernizes, and patient awareness rises. China’s stapokibart approval marked a milestone in domestic innovation and opened the door for locally produced monoclonals at regionally competitive price points. Japan’s robust innovation funding and single-payer insurance framework support high biologic penetration, while Australia and South Korea mirror Western adoption curves. India’s ENT workforce shortfall remains a constraint, though tele-medicine and policy emphasis on noncommunicable diseases could unlock latent demand later this decade. Urban–rural disparities will persist, but incremental expansion of public hospital capacity and private insurance penetration is set to widen treatment access.

Nasal Polyps Treatment Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Get Analysis on Important Geographic Markets
Download PDF

Competitive Landscape

The nasal polyps treatment market is moderately concentrated, with the top five biopharma players collectively responsible for more than 60% of segment revenue. Sanofi-Regeneron’s dupilumab maintains first-mover advantages through broad age-range indications, real-world evidence, and physician familiarity. AstraZeneca-Amgen’s tezepelumab has demonstrated exceptional surgery-avoidance efficacy, potentially shifting prescribing for severe CRSwNP cases once approved. GSK’s depemokimab aims to exploit IL-5 biology, while Keymed Biosciences represents regional challenger momentum following stapokibart’s Chinese launch.

Litigation over cytokine patent breadth and profit-sharing arrangements, as seen in Regeneron-Sanofi transparency disputes, underscores the strategic stakes. Device makers, including Stryker, Medtronic, and Acclarent (now part of Integra LifeSciences), compete on absorbable implants and navigation platforms that complement pharmacotherapy. Integra’s USD billion-sized ENT portfolio acquisition cements its presence in sinus surgery consumables. Partnership models—such as co-promotions between biologic firms and diagnostics startups that supply rapid-assay biomarker kits—illustrate convergence across therapeutics, devices, and digital health. Real-world studies comparing surgery-first versus biologic-first sequencing will likely dictate competitive share allocations in the next five years.

Nasal Polyps Treatment Industry Leaders

  1. Sanofi S.A

  2. OptiNose Inc.

  3. Merck & Co., Inc.

  4. Intersect ENT Inc.

  5. GlaxoSmithKline Plc

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Nasal Polyps Treatment Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.
Need More Details on Market Players and Competitors?
Download PDF

Recent Industry Developments

  • March 2025: GSK received FDA acceptance of depemokimab applications for asthma with type 2 inflammation and CRSwNP, reinforcing the IL-5 pathway race.
  • March 2025: AstraZeneca and Amgen announced that TEZSPIRE met all primary endpoints in the Phase III WAYPOINT trial, cutting surgery need by 98% and strengthening tezepelumab’s clinical positioning.
  • January 2025: Lyra Therapeutics reported positive safety and efficacy results for LYR-210 in a Phase 3 extension study for chronic rhinosinusitis, demonstrating sustained benefits beyond 32 weeks.
  • December 2024: Keymed Biosciences gained Chinese NMPA approval for stapokibart, extending IL-4Rα blockade options in Asia.
  • September 2024: Sanofi secured FDA approval to extend dupilumab to adolescents aged 12–17 with CRSwNP, enlarging the U.S. treatable population.

Table of Contents for Nasal Polyps Treatment Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions & Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope Of The Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Growing Prevalence of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
    • 4.2.2 Increasing Adoption of Biologic Therapies In Treatment Protocols
    • 4.2.3 Rising Healthcare Expenditure and Access to ENT Surgical Care
    • 4.2.4 Favorable Regulatory Approvals and Fast-Track Designations For Novel Drugs
    • 4.2.5 Expansion of Tele-ENT Consultations and Remote Prescription Fulfillment
    • 4.2.6 Integration of AI-Based Diagnostic Tools Enhancing Early Detection Rates
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 High Treatment Costs and Limited Reimbursement for Biologics
    • 4.3.2 Stringent Regulatory and Safety Requirements For Nasal Implants
    • 4.3.3 Low Awareness and Diagnosis Rates in Emerging Markets
    • 4.3.4 Competition From Alternative Therapies and Over-The-Counter Remedies
  • 4.4 Regulatory Landscape
  • 4.5 Porter's Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.5.1 Threat Of New Entrants
    • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power Of Buyers
    • 4.5.3 Bargaining Power Of Suppliers
    • 4.5.4 Threat Of Substitutes
    • 4.5.5 Competitive Rivalry

5. Market Size & Growth Forecasts (Value, USD)

  • 5.1 By Drug Class
    • 5.1.1 Corticosteroids
    • 5.1.2 Antibiotics
    • 5.1.3 Leukotriene Inhibitors
    • 5.1.4 Other Drug Class
  • 5.2 By Route Of Administration
    • 5.2.1 Nasal Sprays
    • 5.2.2 Oral Tablets & Suspensions
    • 5.2.3 Injectable / IV
    • 5.2.4 Exhalation Delivery Systems
    • 5.2.5 Implantable Devices
  • 5.3 By Distribution Channel
    • 5.3.1 Hospital Pharmacies
    • 5.3.2 Retail Pharmacies
    • 5.3.3 Online Pharmacies
    • 5.3.4 Specialty Clinics
  • 5.4 By End User
    • 5.4.1 Hospitals
    • 5.4.2 ENT Clinics
    • 5.4.3 Ambulatory Surgery Centers
    • 5.4.4 Home-Care Settings
  • 5.5 Geography
    • 5.5.1 North America
    • 5.5.1.1 United States
    • 5.5.1.2 Canada
    • 5.5.1.3 Mexico
    • 5.5.2 Europe
    • 5.5.2.1 Germany
    • 5.5.2.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.5.2.3 France
    • 5.5.2.4 Italy
    • 5.5.2.5 Spain
    • 5.5.2.6 Rest of Europe
    • 5.5.3 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.3.1 China
    • 5.5.3.2 Japan
    • 5.5.3.3 India
    • 5.5.3.4 Australia
    • 5.5.3.5 South Korea
    • 5.5.3.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.5.4 Middle East & Africa
    • 5.5.4.1 GCC
    • 5.5.4.2 South Africa
    • 5.5.4.3 Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • 5.5.5 South America
    • 5.5.5.1 Brazil
    • 5.5.5.2 Argentina
    • 5.5.5.3 Rest of South America

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Market Share Analysis
  • 6.3 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Business Segments, Financials, Headcount, Key Information, Market Rank, Market Share, Products and Services, and analysis of Recent Developments)
    • 6.3.1 Sanofi S.A.
    • 6.3.2 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
    • 6.3.3 GlaxoSmithKline Plc
    • 6.3.4 OptiNose Inc.
    • 6.3.5 Intersect ENT Inc.
    • 6.3.6 Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
    • 6.3.7 Merck & Co., Inc.
    • 6.3.8 F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
    • 6.3.9 Novartis AG
    • 6.3.10 Pfizer Inc.
    • 6.3.11 AstraZeneca Plc
    • 6.3.12 Allakos Inc.
    • 6.3.13 Lyra Therapeutics Inc.
    • 6.3.14 Medtronic Plc
    • 6.3.15 Stryker Corporation
    • 6.3.16 Amgen Inc.
    • 6.3.17 Bristol Myers Squibb
    • 6.3.18 Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.

7. Market Opportunities & Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-Space & Unmet-Need Assessment
You Can Purchase Parts Of This Report. Check Out Prices For Specific Sections
Get Price Break-up Now

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the nasal polyps treatment market as all prescription and over-the-counter pharmacologic therapies, corticosteroid sprays, oral steroids, antibiotics, leukotriene modifiers, antihistamines, and approved biologics, plus single-use implantable steroid devices that are specifically indicated for the reduction or recurrence control of benign polyps in the paranasal sinuses.

Scope exclusion: We do not count surgical facility fees or equipment sales for functional endoscopic sinus surgery because those revenues sit within the broader ENT devices domain.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Drug Class
    • Corticosteroids
    • Antibiotics
    • Leukotriene Inhibitors
    • Other Drug Class
  • By Route Of Administration
    • Nasal Sprays
    • Oral Tablets & Suspensions
    • Injectable / IV
    • Exhalation Delivery Systems
    • Implantable Devices
  • By Distribution Channel
    • Hospital Pharmacies
    • Retail Pharmacies
    • Online Pharmacies
    • Specialty Clinics
  • By End User
    • Hospitals
    • ENT Clinics
    • Ambulatory Surgery Centers
    • Home-Care Settings
  • Geography
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • Rest of Europe
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • Japan
      • India
      • Australia
      • South Korea
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • Middle East & Africa
      • GCC
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle East & Africa
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Mordor analysts interviewed ENT surgeons, allergy specialists, and market access managers across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America. These conversations validated prevalence filters, price erosion assumptions for mature steroids, and early adoption rates for biologics, closing gaps that literature alone could not bridge.

Desk Research

We began with publicly available epidemiology series from sources such as the Global Burden of Disease Study, the CDC's National Health Interview Survey, and Eurostat hospital discharge files, which anchor prevalence, treated-patient pools, and procedure rates. Clinical guidelines from the American Academy of Otolaryngology and the European Rhinologic Society shaped therapy pathways, while FDA and EMA approval archives clarified launch timelines and label expansions. Company 10-Ks, investor decks, and trial registries supplied average selling prices and uptake curves. Paid databases, including D&B Hoovers for manufacturer financials and Questel for recent delivery-device patents, offered added granularity. This list is illustrative, not exhaustive.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

We apply a top-down prevalence-to-treated cohort build, multiplying diagnosed CRSwNP cases by treatment penetration and weighted annual therapy cost; supplier roll-ups and sampled ASP times volume checks serve as a selective bottom-up counterpoint. Key variables include diagnosed prevalence per 100,000 population, biologic share of advanced cases, implantable device placements, average corticosteroid unit price, and repeat-procedure probability, all forecast through multivariate regression with scenario tests against guideline shifts. Data voids in channel volumes are back-filled using regional reimbursement caps and physician survey medians before final calibration.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Our model flows through peer review, variance scans against external prescription audits, and anomaly callbacks with original respondents. The dataset refreshes annually, with interim updates triggered by major drug approvals or safety withdrawals, and a live check is performed before each client delivery.

Why Mordor's Nasal Polyps Treatment Baseline Commands Reliability

Published estimates often diverge because firms select different therapy baskets, currency bases, and refresh cadences. We clarify those levers so decision-makers see exactly why numbers move.

Key gap drivers include variance in whether biologic injections or implantable devices are counted, differing assumptions on steroid price deflation, and the frequency with which prevalence data are re-benchmarked.

Benchmark comparison

Market Size Anonymized source Primary gap driver
USD 3.99 B (2025) Mordor Intelligence -
USD 3.65 B (2025) Global Research Firm A Excludes implantable devices and relies on 2023 prevalence ratios without mid-period refresh
USD 5.68 B (2025) Industry Journal B Adds surgical procedure revenues and applies a single global ASP that inflates biologic spend

These comparisons show that our disciplined scope definition, variable-level triangulation, and yearly update cadence deliver a balanced, transparent baseline clients can trace and reproduce with confidence.

Need A Different Region or Segment?
Customize Now

Key Questions Answered in the Report

What is the current value of the nasal polyps treatment market?

The nasal polyps treatment market stands at USD 3.99 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 5.44 billion by 2030.

Which region generates the largest revenue in nasal polyps care?

North America leads with 42.45% revenue share, benefiting from broad biologic coverage and early adoption of advanced delivery systems.

What is the fastest-growing drug class for nasal polyps?

Biologics represent the fastest-expanding class, recording an 8.54% CAGR through 2030 thanks to superior efficacy and disease-modifying potential.

How are online pharmacies influencing the market?

Online pharmacies are growing at a 9.34% CAGR as tele-medicine and e-prescribing enable home delivery of maintenance sprays and specialty biologics.

Which delivery technology shows the highest growth?

Exhalation delivery systems, exemplified by XHANCE, are forecast to grow at an 8.66% CAGR due to improved sinus drug deposition and patient compliance.

What limits wider biologic adoption?

High annual therapy costs exceeding USD 30,000 and varying reimbursement criteria remain the primary barriers, especially in emerging markets.

Page last updated on:

Nasal Polyps Treatment Report Snapshots