Nasal Polyps Treatment Market Size and Share
Nasal Polyps Treatment Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence
The nasal polyps treatment market size is valued at USD 3.99 billion in 2025 and is forecast to reach USD 5.44 billion by 2030, advancing at a 6.41% CAGR. Demand is rising as physicians shift from broad corticosteroid use toward precision biologics that interrupt interleukin-4, -5 and -13 signaling pathways. Growth is reinforced by the high coexistence of asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), the expansion of fast-track biologic approvals, and steady uptake of minimally invasive delivery systems that improve intranasal drug deposition. Competition intensifies as large pharmaceutical groups protect market positions through life-cycle management and co-promotion agreements, while smaller biotechnology companies target under-served patient segments through differentiated mechanisms of action. Digital pharmacy channels, broader ENT specialist networks, and favorable reimbursement pilots in developed markets further expand patient access, although cost containment policies in price-sensitive regions remain a headwind.
Key Report Takeaways
- By drug class, corticosteroids led with 42.34% of the nasal polyps treatment market share in 2024, while the biologics-dominated “Other Drug Class” segment is projected to expand at an 8.54% CAGR through 2030.
- By route of administration, nasal sprays commanded 48.43% revenue share in 2024; exhalation delivery systems are forecast to grow at an 8.66% CAGR over the same period.
- By distribution channel, hospital pharmacies held 46.56% share of the nasal polyps treatment market size in 2024, whereas online pharmacies are set to rise at a 9.34% CAGR to 2030.
- By end user, hospitals accounted for 51.23% share in 2024, with ENT clinics advancing at a 9.56% CAGR on the back of specialized diagnostics.
- By geography, North America contributed 42.45% market share in 2024, while Asia-Pacific is the fastest-growing region at a 7.45% CAGR through 2030.
Global Nasal Polyps Treatment Market Trends and Insights
Driver Impact Analysis
| Driver | % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growing prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps | +1.8% | Global (highest in North America & Europe) | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Increasing adoption of biologic therapies in treatment protocols | +2.1% | North America & EU leading, APAC emerging | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Rising healthcare expenditure and access to ENT surgical care | +1.2% | Asia-Pacific core, spill-over to Middle East & Africa | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Favorable regulatory approvals and fast-track designations for novel drugs | +1.4% | Global, with regulatory precedence in US & EU | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Expansion of Tele-ENT consultations and remote prescription fulfillment | +0.9% | North America & Asia-Pacific | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Integration of AI-based diagnostic tools enhancing early detection rates | +1.0% | North America & Europe | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
Growing Prevalence of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Global CRSwNP prevalence is climbing as environmental pollutants, urban allergens, and ageing populations converge, raising disease incidence to roughly 4% of adults worldwide[1]American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, “Rhinosinusitis Prevalence and Asthma Comorbidity,” aaaai.org. Diagnosis rates improve in developed markets thanks to widespread endoscopic screening, but limited ENT capacity in emerging regions delays detection. About 60% of CRSwNP patients also have asthma, compounding morbidity and increasing the need for combination therapies that deliver longer-lasting symptom remission. North American and European payers already recognize the economic burden of recurrent surgeries and systemic steroid use, prompting policy discussions around earlier biologic intervention. In Asia-Pacific, rapid industrial expansion intensifies air-quality issues, which, together with the build-out of tertiary hospitals, is generating a pronounced uptick in patient volumes.
Increasing Adoption of Biologic Therapies in Treatment Protocols
Targeted biologics such as dupilumab, tezepelumab, and stapokibart ease nasal obstruction, reduce polyp grade, and lower surgery rates, prompting guideline updates that prioritize their use in refractory CRSwNP. Dupilumab’s 2024 adolescent approval broadened the eligible U.S. cohort by about 9,000 patients, while tezepelumab’s Phase III WAYPOINT trial reported a 98% cut in surgical interventions, positioning it as a competitive benchmark. Physicians increasingly combine biologics with topical corticosteroids to consolidate control, and payers reward documented improvements in work productivity and reduced emergency visits. China’s stapokibart authorization in 2024 signaled a strategic move toward local innovation, setting the stage for wider Asia-Pacific penetration of premium biologics. Ongoing head-to-head trials will likely refine positioning by endotype, driving incremental share shifts within the biologics segment.
Rising Healthcare Expenditure and Access to ENT Surgical Care
Asia-Pacific medical technology spend is forecast to reach USD 140 billion in 2025, equipping hospitals with advanced endoscopes, navigation systems, and postoperative care platforms. However, India still fields only one ENT surgeon per 28,000 residents, underlining resource gaps that favor non-surgical biologic routes. Tele-ENT services mitigate distance barriers and feed digital prescription channels that ship maintenance sprays direct to homes. Meanwhile, global otorhinolaryngology device sales, at USD 13.99 billion in 2026, illustrate healthy capital expenditure on minimally invasive instruments that shorten operating times and accelerate recovery. This dual investment in surgery and medical management broadens the therapeutic toolkit and sustains overall market expansion.
Favorable Regulatory Approvals and Fast-Track Designations for Novel Drugs
Regulators have accelerated review pathways to close the treatment gap in CRSwNP, granting fast-track and breakthrough tags to multiple monoclonal antibodies. GSK’s depemokimab received FDA submission acceptance in March 2025, underscoring momentum around IL-5 blockade. The March 2024 approval of XHANCE for chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps created a precedent for label expansion in adjacent rhinosinusitis phenotypes. Harmonization between FDA, EMA and China’s NMPA lowers duplicative trial requirements, speeding global launches. Pediatric indications command high public-health priority and further justify priority review vouchers, effectively shortening time-to-market and maintaining the innovation cycle.
Restraints Impact Analysis
| Restraints Impact Analysis | (~) % Impact on CAGR Forecast | Geographic Relevance | Impact Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|
| High treatment costs and limited reimbursement for biologics | -1.6% | Global (strongest in emerging markets) | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Stringent regulatory and safety requirements for nasal implants | -0.8% | United States & European Union | Long term (≥ 4 years) |
| Low awareness and diagnosis rates in emerging markets | -1.1% | Africa, South Asia & Latin America | Medium term (2-4 years) |
| Competition from alternative therapies and over-the-counter remedies | -0.7% | North America & Europe | Short term (≤ 2 years) |
| Source: Mordor Intelligence | |||
High Treatment Costs and Limited Reimbursement for Biologics
Annual dupilumab therapy exceeds USD 30,000 in the United States, placing pressure on commercial payers to deploy prior-authorization hurdles that elongate treatment timelines[2]Tufts Medical Center Institute for Clinical and Economic Review, “Coverage Policies for Biologics in CRSwNP,” tuftsmedicalcenter.org. Cost-effectiveness studies show biologics outperform systemic steroids in quality-adjusted life-years, yet budget impact for health plans remains substantial, particularly when layered on top of expanding specialty drug pipelines. In lower-middle-income economies, biologic usage is often limited to self-pay urban elites, widening equity gaps. Biosimilar entry after 2028 may ease price tension, but payers will still negotiate steep rebates to curb specialty spending growth. Ancillary costs, including injection training and pharmacovigilance, further complicate universal coverage in stewardship-driven reimbursement systems.
Stringent Regulatory and Safety Requirements for Nasal Implants
Implantable corticosteroid or absorbable scaffold devices must prove biocompatibility, non-migration, and long-term mucosal safety in heterogeneous anatomies, extending development timelines. FDA post-market surveillance rules add incremental cost layers for smaller device innovators, often diverting resources toward orthopedic or cardiovascular programs with clearer reimbursement uplifts. Divergent EU MDR clauses around reusable device reprocessing and traceability complicate pan-European rollouts. Manufacturing controls demand high-purity polymer inputs and particle-free cleanrooms, resulting in steep fixed costs that dissuade new entrants. Consequently, pipeline activity tilts toward drug-device combination sprays that face a more predictable regulatory path, delaying adoption of high-potential implants in many regions.
Segment Analysis
By Drug Class: Biologics Drive Premium Segment Growth
Corticosteroids retained 42.34% share of the nasal polyps treatment market in 2024 on the back of favorable pricing and wide prescriber familiarity. Yet biologic therapies within the “Other Drug Class” bracket are expanding at an 8.54% CAGR, propelled by robust real-world effectiveness and multi-cohort label extensions. Antibiotic usage is falling as mechanistic focus shifts from infectious to type 2 inflammatory drivers. Leukotriene modifiers remain niche, serving patients with comorbid asthma yet limited standalone benefit in polyp regression.
The competitive tide is evident in hospital formularies, where biologic utilization in high-surgery-risk cohorts is rising quarter-on-quarter. Dupilumab’s adolescent indication, tezepelumab’s near-approval status, and China’s stapokibart launch intensify attention on disease-modifying results that reduce revision surgeries and cumulative systemic steroid exposure. Payer scrutiny is tightening but long-term cost offsets from fewer operating-room episodes and productivity gains strengthen the biologic value narrative. Post-2028 biosimilar waves should gradually unlock fuller access while sustaining innovation incentives for next-generation cytokine targets.
Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase
By Route of Administration: Targeted Delivery Systems Gain Traction
Nasal sprays delivered 48.43% revenue share in 2024, benefiting from patient-friendly formats and over-the-counter steroid options that manage mild-to-moderate symptoms. Exhalation delivery systems, led by XHANCE’s closed-palate mechanism, are on track for an 8.66% CAGR by 2030 as studies confirm deeper sinus penetration and better polyp shrinkage scores. Oral and injectable routes remain relevant for systemic treatments, especially during acute exacerbations or for biologic dosing every 2–8 weeks. Implantable devices, exemplified by SINUVA and LATERA, occupy an early-adopter niche awaiting further long-term safety data.
Emerging solutions combine handheld battery-assisted atomizers with sensors that log dosing compliance to cloud portals, supporting remote physician oversight. Stryker’s LATERA absorbable implant reportedly saves USD 2,200 per patient compared with functional endoscopic sinus surgery in suitable lateral wall collapse cases. Uptake of such implants remains country-specific, hinging on specialist skill sets and reimbursement scheduling. As device makers refine ergonomics and integrate digital guidance, payers may favor these technologies for their potential to lower intensive surgical episodes.
By Distribution Channel: Digital Transformation Accelerates Online Growth
Hospital pharmacies represented 46.56% of the nasal polyps treatment market size in 2024, reflecting centralized biologic inventories, cold-chain controls, and immediate post-infusion monitoring services. Online pharmacies are growing at a 9.34% CAGR, underpinned by e-prescription laws and patient expectations for doorstep specialty medication delivery with adherence apps. Retail chains hold steady volumes via intranasal sprays, while specialty clinics increasingly manage biologic dispensing under coordinated care agreements.
Health systems integrate tele-ENT consultation portals, enabling remote diagnosis, e-consult coding, and synchronized pharmacy shipments, especially across rural catchments in Asia-Pacific. National regulators now allow electronic prior authorizations and temperature-controlled courier models, sustaining biological integrity to the patient’s refrigerator. Pharmacy benefit managers expand nurse-navigator programs for biologic titration, supporting home-administration paradigms that lower infusion-center overheads and broaden regional reach.
By End User: ENT Clinics Emerge as Specialized Care Centers
Hospitals accounted for 51.23% revenue share in 2024, backed by superior imaging suites, integrated surgical theaters, and multidisciplinary allergy-pulmonology collaboration. ENT clinics are the fastest, at a 9.56% CAGR, as high-definition endoscopes, cone-beam CT scanners, and biologic inventory financing give single-specialty centers comparable capabilities at lower fixed-cost bases. Ambulatory surgery centers add volume for less complex procedures, such as polypectomy with balloon sinuplasty, while home care garners interest for biologic maintenance in stable patients.
The Global Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Initiative’s equipment minimums empower emerging-market clinics to perform reliable diagnostics, thereby capturing patient loyalty[3]PubMed, “Global Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Initiative: Core Equipment,” pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. AI-driven decision-support platforms filter endoscopic images to grade polyp severity and recommend evidence-based treatment plans, raising clinic throughput. Pay-for-performance models tie reimbursement to patient-reported outcomes, rewarding centers that minimize repeat surgeries and systemic steroid bursts, thus favoring specialized ENT environments.
Geography Analysis
North America led the nasal polyps treatment market in 2024 with 42.45% share, underpinned by strong prescribing of FDA-cleared biologics, widespread insurance coverage for specialty drugs, and active patient advocacy groups that facilitate early diagnosis. The United States accounts for the bulk of regional revenue, leveraging real-time benefits checks and manufacturer copay programs that offset high list prices. Canada’s provincial drug plans steadily add biologics to formularies following health-technology assessments, while Mexico’s growing private insurance pool is accelerating corticosteroid spray and balloon sinuplasty uptake. Ongoing payer negotiations create heterogeneous access, yet steady commercial uptake has cemented the region’s leadership.
Europe shows balanced growth, supported by centralized EMA reviews that streamline multinational launches. Germany and the United Kingdom anchor clinical research networks and employ stringent cost-effectiveness thresholds, accelerating tender competition and risk-sharing contracts for biologic reimbursement. France and Italy benefit from specialist training programs and universal coverage, keeping surgery queues short and biologic adoption steady. Spain, with upgraded tertiary ENT hubs and improving macroeconomics, is emerging as a significant volume contributor. EU aging demographics and stringent workplace wellness mandates sustain long-term demand.
Asia-Pacific is projected to achieve the fastest 7.45% CAGR through 2030 as healthcare spending expands, infrastructure modernizes, and patient awareness rises. China’s stapokibart approval marked a milestone in domestic innovation and opened the door for locally produced monoclonals at regionally competitive price points. Japan’s robust innovation funding and single-payer insurance framework support high biologic penetration, while Australia and South Korea mirror Western adoption curves. India’s ENT workforce shortfall remains a constraint, though tele-medicine and policy emphasis on noncommunicable diseases could unlock latent demand later this decade. Urban–rural disparities will persist, but incremental expansion of public hospital capacity and private insurance penetration is set to widen treatment access.
Competitive Landscape
The nasal polyps treatment market is moderately concentrated, with the top five biopharma players collectively responsible for more than 60% of segment revenue. Sanofi-Regeneron’s dupilumab maintains first-mover advantages through broad age-range indications, real-world evidence, and physician familiarity. AstraZeneca-Amgen’s tezepelumab has demonstrated exceptional surgery-avoidance efficacy, potentially shifting prescribing for severe CRSwNP cases once approved. GSK’s depemokimab aims to exploit IL-5 biology, while Keymed Biosciences represents regional challenger momentum following stapokibart’s Chinese launch.
Litigation over cytokine patent breadth and profit-sharing arrangements, as seen in Regeneron-Sanofi transparency disputes, underscores the strategic stakes. Device makers, including Stryker, Medtronic, and Acclarent (now part of Integra LifeSciences), compete on absorbable implants and navigation platforms that complement pharmacotherapy. Integra’s USD billion-sized ENT portfolio acquisition cements its presence in sinus surgery consumables. Partnership models—such as co-promotions between biologic firms and diagnostics startups that supply rapid-assay biomarker kits—illustrate convergence across therapeutics, devices, and digital health. Real-world studies comparing surgery-first versus biologic-first sequencing will likely dictate competitive share allocations in the next five years.
Nasal Polyps Treatment Industry Leaders
-
Sanofi S.A
-
OptiNose Inc.
-
Merck & Co., Inc.
-
Intersect ENT Inc.
-
GlaxoSmithKline Plc
- *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Recent Industry Developments
- March 2025: GSK received FDA acceptance of depemokimab applications for asthma with type 2 inflammation and CRSwNP, reinforcing the IL-5 pathway race.
- March 2025: AstraZeneca and Amgen announced that TEZSPIRE met all primary endpoints in the Phase III WAYPOINT trial, cutting surgery need by 98% and strengthening tezepelumab’s clinical positioning.
- January 2025: Lyra Therapeutics reported positive safety and efficacy results for LYR-210 in a Phase 3 extension study for chronic rhinosinusitis, demonstrating sustained benefits beyond 32 weeks.
- December 2024: Keymed Biosciences gained Chinese NMPA approval for stapokibart, extending IL-4Rα blockade options in Asia.
- September 2024: Sanofi secured FDA approval to extend dupilumab to adolescents aged 12–17 with CRSwNP, enlarging the U.S. treatable population.
Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope
Market Definitions and Key Coverage
Our study defines the nasal polyps treatment market as all prescription and over-the-counter pharmacologic therapies, corticosteroid sprays, oral steroids, antibiotics, leukotriene modifiers, antihistamines, and approved biologics, plus single-use implantable steroid devices that are specifically indicated for the reduction or recurrence control of benign polyps in the paranasal sinuses.
Scope exclusion: We do not count surgical facility fees or equipment sales for functional endoscopic sinus surgery because those revenues sit within the broader ENT devices domain.
Segmentation Overview
- By Drug Class
- Corticosteroids
- Antibiotics
- Leukotriene Inhibitors
- Other Drug Class
- By Route Of Administration
- Nasal Sprays
- Oral Tablets & Suspensions
- Injectable / IV
- Exhalation Delivery Systems
- Implantable Devices
- By Distribution Channel
- Hospital Pharmacies
- Retail Pharmacies
- Online Pharmacies
- Specialty Clinics
- By End User
- Hospitals
- ENT Clinics
- Ambulatory Surgery Centers
- Home-Care Settings
- Geography
- North America
- United States
- Canada
- Mexico
- Europe
- Germany
- United Kingdom
- France
- Italy
- Spain
- Rest of Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- China
- Japan
- India
- Australia
- South Korea
- Rest of Asia-Pacific
- Middle East & Africa
- GCC
- South Africa
- Rest of Middle East & Africa
- South America
- Brazil
- Argentina
- Rest of South America
- North America
Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation
Primary Research
Mordor analysts interviewed ENT surgeons, allergy specialists, and market access managers across North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America. These conversations validated prevalence filters, price erosion assumptions for mature steroids, and early adoption rates for biologics, closing gaps that literature alone could not bridge.
Desk Research
We began with publicly available epidemiology series from sources such as the Global Burden of Disease Study, the CDC's National Health Interview Survey, and Eurostat hospital discharge files, which anchor prevalence, treated-patient pools, and procedure rates. Clinical guidelines from the American Academy of Otolaryngology and the European Rhinologic Society shaped therapy pathways, while FDA and EMA approval archives clarified launch timelines and label expansions. Company 10-Ks, investor decks, and trial registries supplied average selling prices and uptake curves. Paid databases, including D&B Hoovers for manufacturer financials and Questel for recent delivery-device patents, offered added granularity. This list is illustrative, not exhaustive.
Market-Sizing & Forecasting
We apply a top-down prevalence-to-treated cohort build, multiplying diagnosed CRSwNP cases by treatment penetration and weighted annual therapy cost; supplier roll-ups and sampled ASP times volume checks serve as a selective bottom-up counterpoint. Key variables include diagnosed prevalence per 100,000 population, biologic share of advanced cases, implantable device placements, average corticosteroid unit price, and repeat-procedure probability, all forecast through multivariate regression with scenario tests against guideline shifts. Data voids in channel volumes are back-filled using regional reimbursement caps and physician survey medians before final calibration.
Data Validation & Update Cycle
Our model flows through peer review, variance scans against external prescription audits, and anomaly callbacks with original respondents. The dataset refreshes annually, with interim updates triggered by major drug approvals or safety withdrawals, and a live check is performed before each client delivery.
Why Mordor's Nasal Polyps Treatment Baseline Commands Reliability
Published estimates often diverge because firms select different therapy baskets, currency bases, and refresh cadences. We clarify those levers so decision-makers see exactly why numbers move.
Key gap drivers include variance in whether biologic injections or implantable devices are counted, differing assumptions on steroid price deflation, and the frequency with which prevalence data are re-benchmarked.
Benchmark comparison
| Market Size | Anonymized source | Primary gap driver |
|---|---|---|
| USD 3.99 B (2025) | Mordor Intelligence | - |
| USD 3.65 B (2025) | Global Research Firm A | Excludes implantable devices and relies on 2023 prevalence ratios without mid-period refresh |
| USD 5.68 B (2025) | Industry Journal B | Adds surgical procedure revenues and applies a single global ASP that inflates biologic spend |
These comparisons show that our disciplined scope definition, variable-level triangulation, and yearly update cadence deliver a balanced, transparent baseline clients can trace and reproduce with confidence.
Key Questions Answered in the Report
What is the current value of the nasal polyps treatment market?
The nasal polyps treatment market stands at USD 3.99 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach USD 5.44 billion by 2030.
Which region generates the largest revenue in nasal polyps care?
North America leads with 42.45% revenue share, benefiting from broad biologic coverage and early adoption of advanced delivery systems.
What is the fastest-growing drug class for nasal polyps?
Biologics represent the fastest-expanding class, recording an 8.54% CAGR through 2030 thanks to superior efficacy and disease-modifying potential.
How are online pharmacies influencing the market?
Online pharmacies are growing at a 9.34% CAGR as tele-medicine and e-prescribing enable home delivery of maintenance sprays and specialty biologics.
Which delivery technology shows the highest growth?
Exhalation delivery systems, exemplified by XHANCE, are forecast to grow at an 8.66% CAGR due to improved sinus drug deposition and patient compliance.
What limits wider biologic adoption?
High annual therapy costs exceeding USD 30,000 and varying reimbursement criteria remain the primary barriers, especially in emerging markets.
Page last updated on: