Firefighting Foam Market Size and Share

Firefighting Foam Market (2026 - 2031)
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Firefighting Foam Market Analysis by Mordor Intelligence

The Firefighting Foam Market size is estimated at USD 0.92 billion in 2026, and is expected to reach USD 1.18 billion by 2031, at a CAGR of 5.11% during the forecast period (2026-2031). Ongoing regulatory pressure against per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) is accelerating a pivot away from aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) toward fluorine-free concentrates that help asset owners sidestep liability exposure under new U.S. and European rules. At the same time, stricter industrial‐safety mandates in oil, gas, mining, and warehouse environments are lifting baseline demand for fixed-foam systems, while rapid build-out of LNG bunkering, hydrogen hubs, and mega-logistics facilities is opening new high-growth application pockets across Asia-Pacific and the Middle East. Competitive intensity is rising as specialty suppliers introduce second-generation fluorine-free formulations that close historical performance gaps and secure third-party certifications from Underwriters Laboratories (UL) and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). Together, these forces are reshaping procurement strategies, driving capital-expenditure cycles for retrofits, and compressing the product-development window for incumbents that still rely on PFAS-based chemistries.

Key Report Takeaways

  • By foam type, AFFF led with 41.55% revenue share in 2025; other foam types are forecast to expand at a 6.31% CAGR to 2031. 
  • By fluorine content, PFAS-containing products accounted for 54.79% of the Firefighting Foam market share in 2025, while fluorine-free foams are advancing at a 6.61% CAGR through 2031.  
  • By end-user industry, oil and gas commanded a 47.05% share of the Firefighting Foam market size in 2025; mining is projected to grow at a 6.45% CAGR between 2026-2031.  
  • By geography, North America held 38.71% revenue share in 2025; Asia-Pacific is on track for the fastest regional expansion at a 6.04% CAGR through 2031. 

Note: Market size and forecast figures in this report are generated using Mordor Intelligence’s proprietary estimation framework, updated with the latest available data and insights as of January 2026.

Segment Analysis

By Foam Type: Commercial Pressure Shrinks AFFF Supremacy

AFFF maintained 41.55% of the Firefighting Foam market share in 2025, yet its grip weakened under growing regulatory bans and liability costs. Replacement cycles tightened as European airports eliminated AFFF procurement from January 2026, and Australia barred PFAS foams from new airfield projects. Meanwhile, other foam types posted a 6.31% CAGR, the fastest among foam types, as second-generation products such as SOLBERG RE-HEALING RF6 matched ICAO Level B benchmarks.  

End-users now segment procurement. Military, aviation, and petrochemical operators still draw on AFFF inventories for mission-critical functions that require vapor-sealing films, but warehousing, data centers, and mining move decisively toward fluorine-free alternatives that leave minimal residue. Protein foams retain niche demand for tank-farm protection where fuel-shedding properties outweigh environmental concerns. Manufacturers are balancing their strategies: they maintain AFFF production lines for aftermarket refills, yet channel their research and development budget towards developing fluorine-free portfolios.

Firefighting Foam Market: Market Share by Foam Type
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

By Fluorine Content: Momentum Shifts to Zero-PFAS Chemistries

PFAS-containing formulations still represented 54.79% of 2025 global sales, but the fluorine-free segment is projected to outgrow the broader Firefighting Foam market at a 6.61% CAGR through 2031. Europe's decision to phase out PFAS foams by 2028 has reduced historic demand. Meanwhile, a 2025 policy shift by the Federal Aviation Administration prompted U.S. airports to exclusively seek contracts for fluorine-free concentrates. Certifications are now being awarded at a quicker pace: Angus Fire's TRIDOL F3 achieved ICAO Level C in September 2025, bridging a vital performance gap for fire scenarios involving wide-body aircraft.

When considering disposal, cleanup, and litigation costs, the economic advantage leans towards zero-PFAS alternatives. However, hurdles remain. The higher viscosity of these alternatives demands upgrades to piping systems, and their sensitivity to water hardness necessitates investments in filtration. Supply constraints are significant; lead times have surged, delaying retrofits at U.S. naval air stations and in European petrochemical hubs.

By End-User Industry: Energy Complex Drives Volume, Mining Fuels Outperformance

Oil and gas installations contributed 47.05% of 2025 revenues, reflecting stringent NFPA 11 and API 2510 requirements at refineries, offshore platforms, and LNG terminals. Mining demand is expanding fastest at a 6.45% CAGR as lithium and rare-earth extraction projects in Australia, Chile, and the Democratic Republic of Congo adopt foam-water spray systems for battery-storage areas.  

Thanks to aviation retrofits and the establishment of LNG bunkering infrastructure, the transportation sector maintained a steady volume. Meanwhile, chemical and petrochemical facilities shifted their focus towards alcohol-resistant foams. Warehousing and logistics centers, categorized under "other industries," experienced growth, driven by code updates mandating foam systems in high-rack automated facilities. A pilot conversion at ExxonMobil's Beaumont refinery in Texas underscores the rigorous validation standards that deter oil majors from widespread deployment until they confirm compatibility and obtain underwriter approval.

Firefighting Foam Market: Market Share by End-user Industry
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Note: Segment shares of all individual segments available upon report purchase

Geography Analysis

North America retained 38.71% of 2025 revenue, anchored by a dense petrochemical corridor and the largest installed AFFF base worldwide. The U.S. military alone holds thousands of legacy systems slated for replacement, but supply shortages and compatibility tests push completion into 2027. Canada is catching up following Transport Canada’s interim guidance that permits fluorine-free foams at airports subject to risk assessment, whereas Mexico remains constrained by budget and continues to rely on existing AFFF stockpiles.

Asia-Pacific is forecast to expand at a 6.04% CAGR and overtake Europe in absolute growth by 2030. China commands nearly half the regional Firefighting Foam market size, supported by rapid LNG import-terminal construction and coal-chemical investments that require fixed-foam protection. India's new safety code targets LNG facilities exceeding 50,000 m³ and accelerates procurement across planned terminals. Meanwhile, Japan and South Korea, driven by hydrogen-economy legislation, are transitioning to fluorine-free products, mandating foam suppression at production and dispensing sites.

Europe is at the forefront of policy innovation. Starting January 2026, Germany and the Netherlands will prohibit PFAS foams at civilian airports, while Nordic countries mandated zero-PFAS agents in all public facilities by 2025. This early adoption gives regional suppliers an edge to boost exports as other regions align with European standards. Upgrades drive South America and the Middle-East and Africa at Brazilian ethanol terminals and hydrogen initiatives from Saudi Aramco.

Firefighting Foam Market CAGR (%), Growth Rate by Region
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Competitive Landscape

The firefighting foam market is moderately consolidated. Perimeter Solutions invested USD 65 million to certify its RE-HEALING RF6 line, landing contracts at Frankfurt and Heathrow airports once European regulators approved fluorine-free alternatives. Johnson Controls has leveraged global distribution and bundling capacity, offering integrated foam, proportioning equipment, and maintenance packages attractive to mega-warehouse developers. Patent filings hit a record in 2025, focused on bio-based surfactants and low-temperature stabilization, revealing how research and development budgets continue to migrate away from PFAS chemistries. Niche specialists capitalize on application expertise, winning contracts in data centers and lithium mines that require residue-free properties absent in legacy AFFF.

Firefighting Foam Industry Leaders

  1. Johnson Controls

  2. Perimeter Solutions 

  3. Angus Fire

  4. Dafo Fomtec AB

  5. Sthamer

  6. *Disclaimer: Major Players sorted in no particular order
Firefighting Foam Market - Market Concentration
Image © Mordor Intelligence. Reuse requires attribution under CC BY 4.0.

Recent Industry Developments

  • April 2025: Perimeter Solutions unveiled its latest product, SOLBERG SPARTAN, at FDIC 2025. This innovative foam concentrate, boasting a 1% fluorine-free formulation, is engineered to empower firefighters in achieving complete fire suppression. The foam is effective against various fire scenarios, including structure, wildland, vehicle, gasoline, and dumpster blazes.
  • February 2025: Perimeter Solutions reported a 93.42% increase in fire safety sales, reaching USD 436.27 million in 2024. This growth highlights the rising demand for firefighting products, driving innovation and expanding their adoption across various applications.

Table of Contents for Firefighting Foam Industry Report

1. Introduction

  • 1.1 Study Assumptions and Market Definition
  • 1.2 Scope of the Study

2. Research Methodology

3. Executive Summary

4. Market Landscape

  • 4.1 Market Overview
  • 4.2 Market Drivers
    • 4.2.1 Transition toward fluorine-free foams accelerated by PFAS regulations
    • 4.2.2 Strict government mandates to maintain industrial safety
    • 4.2.3 Rising fire risk at expanding LNG bunkering and hydrogen hubs
    • 4.2.4 Mandatory fixed-foam systems in mega-warehouses and automated logistics centers
    • 4.2.5 Increased military and aviation fire-protection retrofits
  • 4.3 Market Restraints
    • 4.3.1 Environmental and health liabilities of PFAS-bearing foams
    • 4.3.2 High disposal, cleanup and retrofit costs for legacy systems
    • 4.3.3 Performance gap and compatibility limits in some fluorine-free alternatives
  • 4.4 Value Chain Analysis
  • 4.5 Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
    • 4.5.1 Threat of New Entrants
    • 4.5.2 Bargaining Power of Buyers
    • 4.5.3 Bargaining Power of Suppliers
    • 4.5.4 Threat of Substitute Products
    • 4.5.5 Degree of Competition

5. Market Size and Growth Forecasts (Value)

  • 5.1 By Foam Type
    • 5.1.1 Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF)
    • 5.1.2 Alcohol-Resistant (AR-AFFF)
    • 5.1.3 Synthetic/ Detergent Foam Concentrate
    • 5.1.4 Protein Foam Concentrate
    • 5.1.5 Other Foam Types (Fluorine-Free Synthetic (F3), etc.)
  • 5.2 By Fluorine Content
    • 5.2.1 PFAS-Containing
    • 5.2.2 Fluorine-Free
  • 5.3 By End-user Industry
    • 5.3.1 Oil and Gas
    • 5.3.2 Chemical and Petrochemical
    • 5.3.3 Mining
    • 5.3.4 Transportation
    • 5.3.5 Other End-User Industries (Military and Defense, Warehousing and Logistics, etc.)
  • 5.4 By Geography
    • 5.4.1 Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.1.1 China
    • 5.4.1.2 India
    • 5.4.1.3 Japan
    • 5.4.1.4 South Korea
    • 5.4.1.5 ASEAN Countries
    • 5.4.1.6 Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • 5.4.2 North America
    • 5.4.2.1 United States
    • 5.4.2.2 Canada
    • 5.4.2.3 Mexico
    • 5.4.3 Europe
    • 5.4.3.1 Germany
    • 5.4.3.2 United Kingdom
    • 5.4.3.3 France
    • 5.4.3.4 Italy
    • 5.4.3.5 Spain
    • 5.4.3.6 NORDIC Countries
    • 5.4.3.7 Rest of Europe
    • 5.4.4 South America
    • 5.4.4.1 Brazil
    • 5.4.4.2 Argentina
    • 5.4.4.3 Rest of South America
    • 5.4.5 Middle-East and Africa
    • 5.4.5.1 Saudi Arabia
    • 5.4.5.2 South Africa
    • 5.4.5.3 Rest of Middle-East and Africa

6. Competitive Landscape

  • 6.1 Market Concentration
  • 6.2 Strategic Moves
  • 6.3 Market Share(%)/Ranking Analysis
  • 6.4 Company Profiles (includes Global level Overview, Market level overview, Core Segments, Financials as available, Strategic Information, Products and Services, and Recent Developments)
    • 6.4.1 Albilad Fighting Systems Ltd.
    • 6.4.2 Angus Fire
    • 6.4.3 BIO EX
    • 6.4.4 Chemguard
    • 6.4.5 Dafo Fomtec AB
    • 6.4.6 Fire Safety Devices Pvt. Ltd. (FireChem)
    • 6.4.7 Foamtech
    • 6.4.8 Johnson Controls
    • 6.4.9 Kerr Fire
    • 6.4.10 Oil Technics Limited
    • 6.4.11 Perimeter Solutions
    • 6.4.12 SFFECO Global
    • 6.4.13 Shanghai Waysmos
    • 6.4.14 Sthamer
    • 6.4.15 Viking Group, Inc.

7. Market Opportunities and Future Outlook

  • 7.1 White-space and Unmet-Need Assessment

Research Methodology Framework and Report Scope

Market Definitions and Key Coverage

Our study defines the global firefighting foam market as the revenue from fresh concentrate formulations (AFFF, AR-AFFF, protein, fluoroprotein, synthetic, and new fluorine-free blends) that producers supply for suppression and training across industrial, municipal, aviation, marine, and specialty settings. Values are captured at ex-factory pricing and converted to constant 2024 US dollars to remove inflation effects.

Scope Exclusion: Fire monitors, proportioning hardware, fixed-system engineering services, and on-site disposal costs sit outside the revenue pool.

Segmentation Overview

  • By Foam Type
    • Aqueous Film-Forming Foam (AFFF)
    • Alcohol-Resistant (AR-AFFF)
    • Synthetic/ Detergent Foam Concentrate
    • Protein Foam Concentrate
    • Other Foam Types (Fluorine-Free Synthetic (F3), etc.)
  • By Fluorine Content
    • PFAS-Containing
    • Fluorine-Free
  • By End-user Industry
    • Oil and Gas
    • Chemical and Petrochemical
    • Mining
    • Transportation
    • Other End-User Industries (Military and Defense, Warehousing and Logistics, etc.)
  • By Geography
    • Asia-Pacific
      • China
      • India
      • Japan
      • South Korea
      • ASEAN Countries
      • Rest of Asia-Pacific
    • North America
      • United States
      • Canada
      • Mexico
    • Europe
      • Germany
      • United Kingdom
      • France
      • Italy
      • Spain
      • NORDIC Countries
      • Rest of Europe
    • South America
      • Brazil
      • Argentina
      • Rest of South America
    • Middle-East and Africa
      • Saudi Arabia
      • South Africa
      • Rest of Middle-East and Africa

Detailed Research Methodology and Data Validation

Primary Research

Mordor analysts interviewed seasoned fire chiefs, foam chemists, oil-and-gas HSE officers, and airport procurement leads across North America, Europe, the GCC, and Asia-Pacific. These discussions validated unit consumption per risk site, concentrate shelf life, and the practical pace of PFAS phase-outs, helping us refine model assumptions.

Desk Research

We begin with authoritative open data. Government fire-safety codes and recall records (NFPA, U.S. EPA Toxic Release Inventory), European Chemicals Agency PFAS restriction drafts, United Nations POPs review files, and International Energy Agency refinery counts establish demand footprints. Trade bodies such as the Fire Equipment Manufacturers' Association and Energy Institute provide shipment logs and incident statistics, while press and patent scans in Dow Jones Factiva and Questel highlight technology shifts.

Company filings pulled through D&B Hoovers, investor decks, customs summaries, and voluntary product-withdrawal notices sharpen regional mix and average selling price trends. The sources named are illustrative only; many additional publications informed data collection, validation, and contextual reads.

Market-Sizing & Forecasting

The top-down model scales concentrate demand from installed risk inventory such as the number of hydrocarbon storage tanks, active drilling rigs, certified airports, chemical plants, and naval vessels, multiplied by verified annual foam usage and replacement rates. Select bottom-up roll-ups of leading supplier revenues and sampled ASP × volume confirm totals. Key forecast drivers, including oil price outlook, mid-stream capital spending, airport construction pipelines, and legislated PFAS compliance deadlines, feed a multivariate regression that projects volumes, then values, through 2030.

Data Validation & Update Cycle

Outputs pass a two-stage analyst review where anomalies versus incident statistics, shipment data, and prior editions are flagged and, when needed, re-checked with respondents. Reports refresh every twelve months, with interim revisions triggered by material regulatory or pricing shocks.

Why Mordor's Firefighting Foam Baseline Is Dependable

Published estimates often diverge because firms choose different foam families, geographic mixes, currency years, and replacement assumptions. Mordor's disciplined scope alignment, annual refresh, and variable-driven modelling temper such swings.

Key gap drivers include bundling of firefighting hardware, exclusion of fluorine-free products, optimistic substitution curves, and inconsistent currency conversions.

Benchmark comparison

Market SizeAnonymized sourcePrimary gap driver
USD 0.87 B (2025) Mordor Intelligence-
USD 1.05 B (2025) Global Consultancy ABundles hardware and wetting agents with concentrates
USD 0.76 B (2021) Industry Publisher BUses older base year and static uptake rates
USD 0.99 B (2024) Trade Journal COmits fluorine-free formulations and applies regional ASP averages globally

The comparison shows that Mordor delivers a balanced, transparent baseline grounded in traceable variables and repeatable steps, giving decision-makers a figure they can trust for planning and investment.

Key Questions Answered in the Report

How large is the Firefighting Foam market in monetary terms?

The Firefighting Foam market size is valued at USD 0.92 billion in 2026 and is forecast to reach USD 1.18 billion by 2031, registering a CAGR of 5.11% in this period.

What is driving the shift toward fluorine-free formulations?

Regulatory bans on PFAS, escalating liability costs, and improving performance parity are pushing asset owners toward certified fluorine-free foams.

Which end-user sector accounts for the highest demand?

Oil and gas operations lead, contributing 47.05% of 2025 revenue thanks to stringent fire-safety codes at refineries, LNG terminals, and tank farms.

Which region is expected to grow fastest by 2031?

Asia-Pacific is projected to post the strongest CAGR at 6.04%, propelled by LNG bunkering, hydrogen hubs, and mega-warehouse construction.

How are suppliers responding to changing regulations?

Market leaders are investing heavily in research and development and capacity for fluorine-free foams, pursuing UL and ICAO certifications, and forming regional production partnerships to shorten lead times.

What are the main cost barriers to AFFF replacement?

High disposal fees for legacy PFAS foams, system retrofits to handle higher-viscosity alternatives, and supply shortages of certified fluorine-free concentrates drive total transition costs upward.

Page last updated on:

Firefighting Foam Market Report Snapshots